we1.l10 - use of nasa data in the joint center for satellite data assimilation
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
IGARSS Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 2010
USE OF NASA DATA IN THE JOINT CENTER FOR SATELLITE DATA
ASSIMILATION (JCSDA)
Lars Peter Riishojgaard, Director, JCSDAand
Sid Ahmed Boukabara, Deputy Director, JCSDA (Presenter)
With contributions from:
M. Rienecker, P. Phoebus, S. Lord, J. Zapotocny, E. Liu, R. Gelaro, V. Kumar, C.D. Peters-Lidard, R. Vogel, F. Weng and many others
Paper #4161 (WE1.L10.3)
2
Overview of Satellite Data Used at JCSDA partners2
Land Data Assimilation Highlights5
JCSDA Structure, Objectives & Science Priorities1
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlights4
Impact Study Experiments6
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlights3
Contents
Conclusions/Summary7
NASA/Earth Science Division
US Navy/Oceanographer andNavigator of the Navy and NRL
NOAA/NESDIS NOAA/NWS
NOAA/OAR
US Air Force/Director of Weather
Mission:
…to accelerate and improve the quantitative use of research and operational satellite data in weather, ocean, climate and environmental analysis and prediction models.
Vision:
An interagency partnership working to become a world leader in applying satellite data and research to operational goals in environmental analysis and prediction
JCSDA Structure and Objectives
IGARSS Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 2010
JCSDA Science Priorities
• Radiative Transfer Modeling (CRTM)• Preparation for assimilation of data from new instruments• Clouds and precipitation• Assimilation of land surface observations• Assimilation of ocean surface observations• Atmospheric composition; chemistry and aerosol
Driving the activities of the Joint Center since 2001, approved by the Science Steering Committee
Overarching goal: Help the operational services improve the quality of their prediction products via improved and accelerated use of satellite data and related research
IGARSS Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 2010
IGARSS Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 2010
5
JCSDA accomplishments
• Common assimilation infrastructure (between NOAA, NASA, AFWA) • Community radiative transfer model (NOAA, Navy, NASA, AFWA)• Common NOAA/NASA/AFWA land data assimilation system (NOAA,
NASA, AFWA)• Numerous new satellite data assimilated operationally, e.g. MODIS (winds
and AOD), AIRS and IASI hyperspectral IR radiances, GPSRO sensors (COSMIC, GRAS, GRACE), SSMI/S, Windsat, Jason-2,…
• Advanced sensors tested for operational readiness, e.g. ASCAT, MLS, SEVIRI (radiances),…
• Ongoing methodology improvement for sensors already assimilated, e.g. AIRS, GPSRO, SSMI/S,…
• Improved physically based SST analysis • Adjoint sensitivity diagnostics• Emerging OSSE capability in support of COSMIC-2, JPSS, GOES-R,
Decadal Survey and other missions
6
Overview of Satellite Data Used at JCSDA partners2
Land Data Assimilation Highlights5
JCSDA Structure, Objectives & Science Priorities1
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlights4
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlights3
Contents
Impact Study Experiments6
Conclusions/Summary7
Navy/FNMOC(NOGAPS with NAVDAS-AR
4DVAR)
NOAA/NCEP (GFS with GSI 3DVAR)
NASA/GMAO
(GEOS-5 w/ 3DVAR)
SSM/I Wind/radiances (2) OPS Not used (Instrument problem) OPS
SSM/I TPW/radiances (2) OPS Not used (Instrument problem) OPS
SSMIS Wind/radiances (2-3) OPS Preparing for testing
SSMIS TPW/radiances (2-3) OPS Preparing for testing
QuikScat Marine Surface Winds (0) OPS/sensor failed OPS/sensor failed OPS/sensor failed
ASCAT Marine Surface Winds (1) OPS Testing
WindSat Marine Surface Winds (1) OPS OPS OPS
WindSat TPW (1) OPS
MODIS IR Atmospheric Motion Vector (AMV) Winds (2)
OPS OPS OPS
MODIS WV AMV Winds (2) OPS OPS OPS
AVHRR IR AMV Winds (2) OPS Testing
ERS-2 (1) OPS Not used (Instrument problem)
AMSR-E (1) (parameter??) Testing to begin soon Preparing for testing passive
TRMM TMI Precip No OPS OPS
SSM/I Precip Not used (Instrument problem)
SSMIS Precip Preparing for testing
Totals
Satellite Data Used at JCSDA Partners (NCEP, Navy, GMAO): Polar Orbiters: Microwave Imagers / Scatterometers / IR/WV Imagers
NASA Sensors
Navy/FNMOC(NOGAPS with NAVDAS-AR 4DVAR)
NOAA/NCEP (GFS with GSI 3DVAR)
NASA/GMAO (GEOS-5 w/ 3DVAR)
AMSU-A (6) OPS OPS as quality permits OPS
AMSU-B/MHS (4) testing OPS as quality permits OPS
HIRS No OPS as quality permits OPS
AIRS (1) OPS OPS OPS
IASI (1) OPS OPS OPS
SSMIS Lower Atmosphere Sounding (LAS) Tb (2-3)
OPS
GPS Precipitable Water (PW) No OPS regional
Monitored global
COSMIC GPS Radio Occultation (RO)
testing OPS (refractivity)
Bending angle monitored
OPS
GRAS RO testing testing
CHAMP/GRACE RO testing GRACE Testing; CHAMP data not received
Totals
Satellite Data Used at JCSDA Partners (NCEP, Navy, GMAO): Polar Orbiters: Microwave Sounders/ IR Sounders/ GPS Profilers
NASA Sensors
Navy/FNMOC (NOGAPS with NAVDAS-AR 4DVAR)
NOAA/NCEP (GFS with GSI 3DVAR)
NASA/GMAO (GEOS-5 w/ 3DVAR)
NOAA AVHRR SST (GAC/LAC) OPS OPS
METOP AVHRR SST (GAC/LAC) OPS Testing
GOES SST (2) OPS OPS
MSG SST (2) (Meteosat)
OPS
MTSAT SST
AMSR-E SST (Aqua)
OPS (at NAVO….not at FNMOC yet)
Testing
AATSR SST (Envisat) OPS
MODIS SST (2) (Terra/Aqua)
No
SSM/I Sea Ice Concentration ( 4) (F-11, F-13, F-14, F-15)
OPS OPS (F-15 only)
SSMIS Sea Ice Concentration (4) (F-16, F-17, F-18)
OPS Testing
SMOS Sea-Surface Salinity (SSS)
MODIS Surface chlorophyll (2) (Terra/Aqua)
Testing R&D system
Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) Surface chlorophyll
Testing R&D system
SeaWiFS Surface chlorophyll Testing R&D system
Satellite Data Used at JCSDA Partners (NCEP, Navy, GMAO): Ocean Sensors: Sea Surface data for NWP, Climate, and/or Ocean Prediction
NASA Sensors
Navy/FNMOC(GNCOM, NCOM w/ NCODA)
NOAA/NCEP
NASA/GMAO (ODAS-2 and ODAS-3 with MOM4)
(2) Jason Altimeter Significant Wave Height (SWH)
OPS --2 OPS -J1
Testing - J2
Envisat –Altimeter SWH OPS Testing
(2) Jason Altimeter Sea Surface Height (SSH)
OPS --2 OPS -J1
Testing - J2
OPS (data from AVISO)
Envisat –Altimeter SSH OPS OPS OPS
TOTAL
Satellite Data Used at JCSDA Partners (NCEP, Navy, GMAO): Ocean Sensors: Altimeters
NASA Sensors
Navy/FNMOC(NAAPS, COAMPS w/ NAVDAS-AOD)
NOAA/NCEP
NASA/GMAO (GEOS-5 w/ 3DVAR)
AF/AFWA
MODIS Aerosol Optical Depth (2) (Terra/Aqua)
OPS Preparation for Testing
SBUV O3 testing OPS as quality permits
OPS
EnviSat O3 No
MLS O3 Available in real time
R&D System
OMI O3 OPS R&D System
GOME Testing
TOTAL
Satellite Data Used at JCSDA Partners (NCEP, Navy, GMAO):Aerosol/Trace Gas Assimilation Sensors
NASA-related Sensors
Navy/FNMOC(No LS DA for our LSM at this time*)
NOAA/NCEP GSI, no LIS at
this time
NASA/GMAO (EnKF with Catchment
LSM)
Soil Moisture (AMSR-E) No Testing R&D system
Soil Moisture (SMOS) No To be Tested
Soil Moisture (SMAP) No Not used
Snow Cover (IMS, multiple sensors) No OPS R&D system
Snow Depth (AFWA, multiple sensors) No OPS R&D system
Land Surface/Skin Temperature No No R&D system
AVHRR Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF, 5-year monthly climatologies
No Testing
AVHRR GVF (weekly, near real time) No Testing
MODIS –IGBP land use (vegetation) class (static field)
No Testing
MODIS maximum deep-snow albedo (static field
No To be tested
MODIS snow-free albedo (sub-monthly static fields)
No To be tested
TOTAL
Satellite Data Used at JCSDA Partners (NCEP, Navy, GMAO):Land Surface Assimilation Sensors
NASA Sensorsimbedded
Summary of NASA-related Sensors Used Operationally (at one or several JCSDA partners)
Implemented Operationally MODIS (IR sensor: multiple products) QuickSCAT (MW scatterometer: sensor failed) TRMM/TMI (MW Imager) AIRS AMSR-E* Jason (NASA/CNES sensor) OMI*
Under Testing/To be tested: SeaWIFS SMAP MLS
*Non-NASA sensors onboard NASA platforms
14
Contents
Overview of Satellite Data Used at JCSDA partners2
Land Data Assimilation Highlights5
JCSDA Structure, Objectives & Science Priorities1
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlights4
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlights3
Impact Study Experiments6
Conclusions/Summary7
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlight:GEOS-5/GSI estimate of cloud top height from AIRS compared with CloudSat
and CALIPSO
• Due to large differences in footprint size between AIRS and CPR/CALIOP, the CTH validation is done only in regions A and C where the clouds are more uniform.
• In general, GSI retrieved CTHs from AIRS are underestimated for optically thick clouds.
• Difficulties in retrieving CTH in multi-layer cloud region.• Next: Include MODIS cloud products for further validation.
CloudSat/CALIPSO track
GSI retrieved cloud top height (CTH) from AIRS
A
B
CA
B
C
AB
C
Slide courtesy of Emily Liu15
Ozone Assimilation in GEOS/GSI System (Steven Steven Pawson)Pawson)
Activities in GEOS-5/GSI include:
• Assimilation of SBUV, OMI and MLS ozone observations
• Improvements to system: observation operator for OMI
(+TOMS/GOME/etc.) kernels Background error covariance models
(beginning)
• Investigations of ozone structure in the UTLS and the troposphere
• Impacts of assimilating MLS profiles on AIRS radiances
• OSSEs for NPP-OMPS: MLS+OMI system is baselineGeneration, retrieval and assimilation
of limb profiler observations16
Present system omits the decrease in sensitivity to low tropospheric ozone in OMI – this is being built into H operator, with expected reduction in impact of OMI ozone in middle troposphere. Results for Jan 2006.
Impact (% change) of O3 from OMI data
Expected impact (% change) with kernels
17
Contents
Overview of Satellite Data Used at JCSDA partners2
Land Data Assimilation Highlights5
JCSDA Structure, Objectives & Science Priorities1
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlights4
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlights3
Impact Study Experiments6
Conclusions/Summary7
18
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlight:Differences between RTOFS SSH analysis and Ssalto/Duacs (independent) SSH analysis
Left panel: with JASON-1/JASON-2/ENVISAT, Right panel : without JASON-2
The right panel shows presence of larger differences in the Gulf Stream region which may lead to formation of spurious mesoscale features.
Increasedvariability
W/OJASON-2
WithJASON-2
Slide courtsey of S. LordRTOFS: Real-Time Ocean Forecast System
19
Contents
Overview of Satellite Data Used at JCSDA partners2
Land Data Assimilation Highlights5
JCSDA Structure, Objectives & Science Priorities1
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlights4
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlights3
Impact Study Experiments6
Conclusions/Summary7
Land Data Assimilation Highlight:Assimilation of multi-sensor snow observations into a land
surface model
•A blended, multi-sensor snow dataset (ANSA) was generated by utilizing the MODIS and AMSR-E retrieved snow datasets.
•These multi-sensor snow observations are employed in the NASA/NOAA/AFWA common Land Information System (LIS).
•The evaluation of assimilation runs against in-situ observations of snow depth and SWE demonstrate improvements as a result of data assimilation
AN
SA
sn
ow m
ap 1
5 J
anu
ary
2007
Courtesy of S. Kumar et al.
Another Land Data Application Highlight:New land surface emissivity for infrared assimilation:
CRTM land bias improvement & positive forecast impact
• Univ. Wisconsin (Seemann & Borbas) spectral infrared emissivity is derived from MODIS-channel emissivity retrievals (monthly composite, 416 wavenumbers)
• Comparison of CRTM simulation to observation shows reduced Tb bias for desert regions when using this emissivity dataset.
Tb difference (K) CRTM sim minus MODIS obs (3.96 µm)
CRTM run with current emis CRTM run with U.Wisc. emis
Less bias with U.Wisc emis
Slide courtesy of R. Vogel, Y. Chen, Q. Liu, Y. Han, F. WengJCSDA & NESDIS/STAR
SaharaDesert
MODIS Used to validate the JCSDA Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) over land surfaces
Forecast impact with GSI shows improved forecast in Southern HemisphereCRTM current IR emis = black line U.Wisc. new IR emis = red line
22
Contents
Overview of Satellite Data Used at JCSDA partners2
Land Data Assimilation Highlights5
JCSDA Structure, Objectives & Science Priorities1
Ocean Data Assimilation Highlights4
Atmospheric Data Assimilation Highlights3
Impact Study Experiments6
Conclusions/Summary7
Fcst Error Reduction (J/kg)
NASA GEOS-5 Navy NOGAPS
Global domain: 00+06 UTC assimilations Jan 2007
Comparison of Data Impacts in Navy and NASA Forecast Systems using Adjoint Tools:
Daily average 24-h observation impacts
AMSU-A, Raob, Satwind and Aircraft have largest impact in all systems
All obs types, except SSMI speeds in GEOS-5, are beneficial
Fcst Error Reduction (J/kg)
23
NASA Sensorsimbedded
Impacts of Various Observing Systems in GEOS-5.5.124-hr Forecasts from 00z Analyses on 28 Jan – 02 March 2010
Adjoint-Based Global Forecast Error Measure
Total Impact Impact Per Observation
Observation Count
Fraction of Beneficial
Observations
Forecast Error Reduction (J/kg) Forecast Error Reduction (1e-6 J/kg)
Improves Forecast Degrades Forecast
Ron Gelaro, GMAO
AMSU-A, Raob, Satwind and Aircraft have largest impact in all systems
NASA Sensors
Data Impact Studies Using NOGAPS/NAVDAS-AR at FNMOC
Per OB Impacts
NASA Sensors
Summary
IGARSS Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 2010
NASA Satellite Data are used in many ways in the JCSDA: Operational Implementation in NWP assimilation models Testing-mode implementation in Operational models Used to validate/improve of some components of operational NWP
models (such as CRTM)
NASA Satellite Data used for multitude of data assimilation activities: Atmospheric data assimilation (sounding, cloud, ozone, air quality, etc) Ocean data assimilation Land data assimilation
NASA Sensors Used include: TMI, MODIS, AIRS, AMSR-E, Jason, OMI
Effort is on-going to assimilate more NASA sensors and others (both existing and future sensors): NPP (CrIS, ATMS, VIIRS), SEVIRI, GPM, SMAP, ADM