Slide 1

Water Wave Impact on Ship Structures Christine M. Ikeda, Ph.D. School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Carolyn Judge UNO Engineering Forum September 19, 2014 Sponsored by: Slide 2 Outline A Hydrodynamics Point of View on the Slamming Impacts experienced by High-Speed Craft: Dynamic Pressures Classical Wedge Drop Study Revisited Tow-Tank Experiments on Planing Craft in Regular Waves Structural Response of Slamming Loads on High-Speed Craft: Full- Field Strain and Deflection Measurements Classical Wedge Drop Study Revisited Tow-Tank Experiments on Semi-Planing Craft in Regular and Irregular waves. Christine Ikeda 2 Acknowledgements: Results shown from the United States Naval Academy were funded by ONR, and the project principal investigator was Carolyn Judge. Special thanks to the Hydromechanics Laboratory Staff at the United States Naval Academy: Dan Rhodes, Mark Pavkov, Bill Beaver, and John Zselecsky Acknowledgements: Results shown from the United States Naval Academy were funded by ONR, and the project principal investigator was Carolyn Judge. Special thanks to the Hydromechanics Laboratory Staff at the United States Naval Academy: Dan Rhodes, Mark Pavkov, Bill Beaver, and John Zselecsky Ship Structure Hydrodynamic loading Structural Response Slide 3 Research Questions: Is there a better way to design marine vehicles if we understand the physics of slamming events? What happens if the bottom of the hull deflects? How does the use of composites or aluminum in ship-building affect the physics and strength of the hull? Laboratory-scaled experimental studies seeking to provide insight into the physics of the slamming events Slamming motions and forces are a function of wave topography, impact angle, forward speed, and body orientation during impact Classic wedge drop experiment with new contributions: Spray Root and high-density pressure measurements Tow-tank experiments on model-scaled planing hull in different wave conditions Slamming Impacts on High-Speed Marine Vessels 3 Image courtesy of Combatant Craft Division (CCD) Little Creek Slide 4 Experimental Details Acrylic wedge, constructed with 1.3-cm thick plates Deadrise angle, = 20 Dimensions in cm Length in and out of screen: 60 cm Measurements: Vertical Acceleration: Accelerometer Vertical position: String Potentiometer High-Speed Video: Phantom Miro M320S Pressure on bottom surface PCB Tekscan Map Drop heights ranging from 8 to 64~cm High- speed camera Point Measurements: PCB Piezotronics Mapping System: Tekscan Slide 5 Pressure Measurements Bottom layout of pressure measurement locations 6 point pressure transducers Pressure mapping system (consists of an array of measurement points) Field of View for High- speed Camera Point-pressure sensors Pressure mapping system Single sensel or measurement point Slide 6 High-Speed Video Video recorded at a speed of 4,000 frames per second and played back at 3 frames per second (1333 times slower than real life) New Contribution Slide 7 What was measured? C. Ikeda, and C. Judge. Impact Pressures and Spray Root Propagation of a Free-Falling wedge. Submitted to Experiments in Fluids, May 2014. P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 P4P4 P5P5 P6P6 Keel Impact Chine impact measured from videos Slide 8 Similarity Solution 7.9 cm31.8 cm63.5 cm Slide 9 Similarity Solution Slide 10 Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 10 Slide 11 Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 11 Slide 12 Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 12 Slide 13 Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 13 Slide 14 Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 14 Slide 15 Pressure Contours Christine Ikeda 15 Slide 16 Spray Root and Pressure Correlations Christine Ikeda 16 Increasing Drop Height The lines show the computed spray root position versus time. The symbols show the position of the peak pressure versus time Slide 17 High-Speed Craft Experiments performed at the United States Naval Academy Slide 18 Experimental Facilities Dual flap, servo hydraulic control wavemaker Regular, irregular and transient waves; frequency range 0.3 to 1.4 Hz Slide 19 Tow-speed: 6.4 m/s Bretschneider Spectrum to develop irregular wave model of a Sea State 3 Condition 9.4 cm significant wave height 1.7 s modal period Regular Wave field based on the most probable waves from Bretschneider Spectrum Wave Height: 6.1 cm Wave Period: 1.1 s Wave Characteristics Slide 20 Planing Hull Characteristics Full-ScaleModel-Scale IModel-Scale II Overall Length ( m [ ft ])13.0 [42.8]1.2 [4]2.4 [8] Maximum Beam ( m [ ft ])4.0 [13.1]0.37 [1.2]0.73 [2.4] Displacement ( metric tons [ lb ])15.9 [35000]0.013 [27.9]0.12 [223] LCG ( m [ ft ])4.6 [15.1]0.42 [1.4]0.85 [2.82] KG ( m [ ft ])1.5 [4.8]0.14 [0.45]0.27[0.9] Fixed degrees of Freedom: Sway, roll, yaw, surge (fixed to carriage) Free in Heave, Pitch Slide 21 Measurements Accelerations A 1 triaxial accelerometer (Heave, Sway and Surge) A 2 & A 3 Heave (vertical accelerations only) Heave and Pitch measured at the LCG Incoming water surface (encounter wave) at 52 cm in front of the bow Wave Height elevation at 30.5 m from the wavemaker (fixed in tow tank) Slide 22 Pressure Measurements Point Pressure Transducers: PCB Piezotronics Model 113B28 Range: 344.7 kPa Temperature effects mitigated with dielectric grease No hydrostatic pressure reading Pressure Mapping System Tekscan High-Speed Pressure Mapping System Range: 690 kPa Reads hydrostatic pressure Sensor Name#1#2#3PCB Tekscan Model Number505195505570N/A Measurement Area (cm 2 )31108175N/A Sensel Area (mm 2 )0.6450.422.924 Number of Sensels193642264N/A Sample Rate (kHz)0.7320.44.420 Slide 23 Tow-Speed: 6.4 m/s (12.4 knots), Regular Waves Movie Taken at 400 fps and played back at 10 fps Run 44 Slide 24 Identification of Single Impact Use of acceleration-time histories to identify a single slam event Free-fall or zero vertical acceleration followed by short duration high, upward acceleration from slam Heave, Pitch and Wave history behavior consistent with the slam event characteristics Run 44 Slide 25 Single Impact Event (Run 44) Tow-Speed: 6.4 m/s (12.4 knots), Regular Waves Movie Taken at 400 fps and played back at 2 fps Slide 26 Pressure Time History Run 44 Point sensor measurement area: 24 mm 2 Sample Rate: 20kHz Sensel measurement area: 0.64 mm 2 Sample Rate: 730 Hz Must assume that the planing motion is symmetric about the keel Slide 27 Spatial Pressure Correlation Run 44 P21 P22 P23 P21 P22 P23 P21 P22 P23 P21 P22 P23 Slide 28 Spatial Pressure Correlation Run 44 P21 P22 P23 P21 P22 P23 P21 P22 P21 P22 P23 Slide 29 Tow Speed: 9 m/s (17.5 knots), Regular waves 2.4-m long model Movie taken at 1400 fps and played back at 150 fps Christine Ikeda 29 Slide 30 Conclusions and Future Work Wedge Drop Experiment Novel method of quantifying the spray root propagation Pressure measurements correlate well with measured spray root propagation Calculated maximum velocity at impact and verification of similarity solution Understanding of the basic physics of these impact events can allow for the development of design tools and can aid in computer model validation High-Speed Planing Craft 146 total runs with about 15-20 impacts per run still a work in progress Analysis of pressure measurements show a discrepancy in pressure magnitudes between the two methods, but qualitatively look reasonable Isolating of individual slamming events using vertical acceleration data show there are different types of behavior based on how the ship hits the water surface, curvature of water surface Slide 31 Structural Response Experiments to be performed at the University of New Orleans Slide 32 Deflection of Ship Hull Bottoms Why is this a concern? Wide-spread use of composite materials in ship-building that are more likely to deflect High-Speed craft slamming into large waves can severely injury passengers; consider an autonomous craft and focus shifts to not damaging the equipment on-board Research Questions: How does the pressure-field in the fluid deform the structure? How does the structure deformation affect the pressure field? 32 Image courtesy of Combatant Craft Division (CCD) Little Creek Ghavami, K. and Khedmati, M.R., Finite Element Analysis - Applications in Mechanical Engineering, 2012 Slide 33 Deflection of Ship Hull Bottoms How can a ship be designed to take into account composite materials or deflections in the hull bottom? Conduct experimental study to determine the strength of the a composite deformable hull Wedge drop study Semi-planing study Use of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) as an non-intrusive way to measure the full field strain on the structure Use of Stereo DIC will allow for out-of-plane deflection Continue to explore fluid dynamics of this problem in addition to the structural motions and deformation (What does the spray root behavior look like on high- speed craft?) 33 Slide 34 Classical Wedge Drop Study Revisited Prismatic Wedges with thin-bottom plates: Aluminum Alloys and Composites Traditional measurements such as pressure, acceleration, heave Full-field strain measurements taken with Stereo- Digital Image Correlation to compute out-of-plane deflections Christine Ikeda 34 High- speed cameras Spatial Correlation Camera 1Camera 2 t1t1 t1t1 t2t2 t2t2 Slide 35 Semi-Planing Craft in Waves Scale-model hulls with thin-bottoms: Aluminum Alloys and Composites Traditional measurements such as pressure, acceleration, heave, pitch, roll Full-field strain measurements taken with Stereo- Digital Image Correlation to compute out-of-plane deflections Christine Ikeda 35 Slide 36 Final Remarks Fluid-Structure Interaction problems are present in many every-day applications. The physics of this interaction is interesting and can provide many new innovations/designs. 36 Off-Shore Wind Turbine Farm, Press-Release Photo from Siemens Image courtesy of Combatant Craft Division (CCD) Little Creek Off-Shore Wind Turbine Farm, Press-Release Photo from Siemens Slide 37 References 37 Ikeda, C., FluidStructure Interactions: Implosions of Shell Structures and Wave Impact on a Flat Plate. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, August 2012.