water-stable nonwovens composed of electrospun fibers from aqueous dispersions by...
TRANSCRIPT
Full Paper
Water-Stable Nonwovens Composed ofElectrospun Fibers from Aqueous Dispersionsby Photo-Cross-Linking
Elisabeth Giebel, Andreas Greiner*
Copolymers of MMA, BA, and MABP are prepared by radical emulsion polymerization in water.As a result aqueous dispersions of these copolymers are obtained with particle sizes around60–120 nm. After addition of some PVA the dispersions are electrospun. The resulting fibersdisplay different morphologies depending on the copolymercomposition. Inter- and intra-particle cross-linking is achievedby photo-cross-linking induced by the MABP moieties yieldingfibers with good thermomechanical properties depending onthe content of MABP. With this approach, thermomechanicallystable electrospun fibers with smooth surface structure can beobtained by electrospinning from water.
1. Introduction
Electrospinning is a versatile method for the preparation of
highly functional nonwovens. The extremely fast develop-
ment of this field is mostly driven by a large variety of
potential applications and simplicity of electrospinning
itself, although the process is of complex nature.[1–6]
Nevertheless, practical application of electrospinning is
hindered for several reasons, depending on the require-
ments of the particular application. One of the major
concerns in technical application of electrospinning is the
need of organic solvents, which are mostly harmful, for
the preparation of water-stable electrospun nonwovens.
Furthermore, the usage of water as solvent in the
electrospinning process opens the way to applications
where toxic or harmful solvents cannot be used, e.g.,
medical applications[7–9] or plant protection.[10] In contrast,
electrospinning of aqueous solutions of water-soluble
polymer result in water-soluble nonwovens unless they
are stabilized by cross-linking or other chemical modifica-
E. Giebel, Prof. A. GreinerDepartment of Chemistry and Scientific Center of MaterialsScience, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Hans-Meerwein Str.,D-35032 Marburg, GermanyE-mail: [email protected]
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlin
Early View Publication; these are NOT
tions of the polymer.[11–14] However, the cross-linking of
water-soluble polymers requires considerable energy and
can result in swelling of the electrospun fibers or brittleness
depending on the degree of cross-linking. An elegant
alternative to water-based electrospinning is electrospin-
ning of aqueous polymer dispersions.[15–20] Electrospinning
of aqueous polymer dispersions offers several advantages
including harmless solvent conditions and higher overall
polymer concentrations due to the inherently lower
viscosities as compared to analogous polymer solutions.
It has been shown that the merging of dispersion particles
upon fiber formation is crucial for electrospun fibers with
decent mechanical properties, which depends on the
adjustment of the polymer glass transition temperature
close to room temperature.[17] However, at temperatures
above room temperature the polymer will flow, leading to a
loss of fiber structure. Thus, the thermomechanical stability
of such fibers is insufficient for many applications. Recently,
dispersion born electrospun fibers with improved thermo-
mechanical properties were obtained by cross-linking of
dispersion particles or by cross-linking between dispersion
particles after electrospinning.[20] The intraparticle
cross-linking was performed during the preparation of
the polymer dispersions by emulsion polymerization
with cross-linking agents. The interparticle cross-linking
occurred during the electrospinning process itself between
elibrary.com Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DOI: 10.1002/mame.201100401 1
the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R
2
REa
www.mme-journal.de
E. Giebel, A. Greiner
functional groups bound to the particles and a cross-link
agent added to the spinning solution.
We wondered whether aqueous polymer dispersions
for electrospinning of electrospun fibers with good
thermomechanical stability could be tailored in that
way that intraparticle and interparticle cross-linking
takes place without the need of addition of extra cross-
linking agents. Building on the previous concepts we
have investigated dispersions with particles which
can be undergo both, interparticle and intraparticle
cross-linking by photo cross-linking as shown in
Figure 1C in comparison to previously published concepts
(Figure 1A, B).
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Materials
Methylmethacrylate (MMA) and butylacrylate (BA, Aldrich) were
purified by distillation over calcium-hydride at reduced pressure.
Sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), potassium peroxodisulfate, 4-hydro-
xybenzophenone, and methacryloyl chloride (Aldrich) were used
as received. Deionized water was degassed by refluxing under
argon for 6 h. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA, Mw¼ 195 000, hydrolysis
grade 98.0–98.8%, Mowiol 56–98) was used as received (Kuraray
Europe).
Figure 1. Different concepts for the preparation of electrospun fiberspublished previously[20] and concept C is reported here in detail.
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DOI
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb
rly View Publication; these are NOT the final pag
2.2. Methods
Characterization of latex fibers was done with a JSM-7500F (JEOL)
scanning electron microscope operating at accelerating voltages of
4 kV.
The solid content of dispersions was determined by TGA using a
Mettler ToledoTGA/STD A 851 at a heating rate of 10 K �min�1
under air. Evaluation was done with 2 STARe software.
Glass transition temperatures were measured by a Mettler
Toledo DSC 821c at heating/cooling rates of 10 K �min�1 under a
nitrogen atmosphere. Evaluation was done with 2 STARe software.
IR-Spectra were taken by a Digilab (Excalibur series) instrument
with ATR crystal ZnSe and WinIRPro software version 3.3.
Stress/strain experiments were performed by a Zwick/Roell BT1-
Fr0.5TN-D14. The test speed was 50 mm �min�1. Evaluation was
done using testXpert II V3.0 software.1H NMR spectroscopy was carried out using a Bruker ARX300-
spectrometer in CDCl3 solution.
2.3. Preparation of 4-Methacryloyloxybenzophenone
100 g (505 mmol) of 4-hydroxy-benzophenone was dissolved in
1 L of dichloromethane, the mixture was cooled in an ice bath
and a solution of 51 mL (525 mmol) of methacryloyl chloride
and 77.5 mL (560 mmol) of triethylamine in 200 mL of dichloro-
methane was added dropwise.[21] The reaction was stirred
at room temperature for 4 h. The solvent was evaporated and
from aqueous dispersions by cross-linking. Concept A and B were
: 10.1002/mame.201100401
H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.MaterialsViews.com
e numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Table 2. Properties of the electrospinning formulations.
Amount
MABP
[mol%]
Conductivity
[mS cm�1]
Surface
tension
[mN m�1]
Viscosity at
a shear rate
of 3000 s�1
0 2.76 52 2.64
1 2.78 56 2.31
2 2.96 57 3.15
Water-Stable Nonwovens Composed of Electrospun Fibers from Aqueous Dispersions . . .
www.mme-journal.de
the residue was dissolved in diethyl ether. The non-soluble
triethylammonium salt was removed by filtration. The organic
phase was washed with water three times and afterwards dried
over Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product
was chromatographed over (7/3 dichloromethane/hexane). The
product was recrystallized from a mixture of dichloromethane
and hexane (2:8).1H NMR (CDCl3, d): 2.08 (3H, s), 5.81 (1H, s), 6.39 (1H, s), 7.18–7.27
(2H, m), 7.46–7.51 (2H, m) 7.57–7.62 (1H, m), 7.77–7.81(2H, m), 7.85–
7.88 (2H, m).
5 3.06 52 2.2610 2.94 54 2.32
2.4. Preparation of Dispersions by Emulsion
Polymerization
A mixture of MMA, BA, and MABP were mixed in ratios as given in
Table 1. 50 mL of water and 114.5 mg of SDS were added to this
mixture and stirred at 1500 rpm in a 250 mL glass reactor under
argon atmosphere at 75 8C. After 15 min of stirring, 68 mg
potassium peroxodisulfate dispersed in 1 mL of water was
added and the stirring speed was reduced to 250 rpm. The mixture
was stirred for additional 60 min and was then allowed to cool
to 20 8C. The resulting dispersion was used without any further
purification.
For DSC and 1H NMR measurement a small amount of dispersion
was precipitated in saturated CaCl2 solution and washed three
times with water and one time with methanol. Afterward it was
dried in vacuum at 20 of 8C.
The experimental ratios of MABP and MMA/BA were analyzed
by 1H NMR spectroscopy by comparing the integrals of the aromatic
protons of the MABP (d¼7.2–7.9), the �OCH2 protons of BA at
d¼ 4.0 and the �OCH3 protons of the MMA at d¼3.6.1H NMR (CDCl3, d): 0.85–2.4 (m), 3.6 (s), 4.0 (s), 7.18–7.27 (m), 7.46–
7.51 (m), 7.57–7.62 (m), 7.77–7.81 (m), 7.85–7.88 (m).
2.5. Electrospinning of Dispersions
A solution of 25 wt% PVA in deionized water was mixed with the
dispersion in a ratio matrix polymer/dispersion (solid content)
1:4. This formulation was electrospun on alumina foil with a
voltage of 40 kV at a distance of 20 cm and a feed rate of
0.05 mL �min�1 through a needle with a diameter of 0.9 mm. The
properties of the electrospinning formulation are shown in
Table 2.
Table 1. Overview of the amount of monomers used in the reaction
Amount of
MABP [%]
BA
[mL] [mmol] [m
0 8.6 61 9
1 8.5 60 9
2 8.4 59 9
5 8.2 57 9
10 7.7 54 8
www.MaterialsViews.com
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DO
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb
Early View Publication; these are NOT
2.6. UV Irradiation
UV irradiation was performed with a medium pressure mercury
lamp TQ 150 (power input 150 Watt) by Heraeus and a quartz
cooling tube. The distance between radiation source and
sample was 20 cm. Irradiation times were varied between 5 and
30 min. For UV irradiation during electrospinning the UV source
was placed in a distance of 60 cm from the electrospinning
setup.
2.7. Sample Preparation for Mechanical Tests
The samples were prepared by collecting the fibers on a rotating
wheel turning at 1000 rpm with a voltage of 20 kV at a distance of
10 cm and a feed rate of 0.05 mL �min�1 through a needle with a
diameter of 0.9 mm. The resulting ribbon with a width of 1 cm was
cut in samples of 2 cm length. A part of the samples was irradiated
with UV light for 30 min on each side. For each MABP content ten
samples were taken before and after UV irradiation.
3. Results and Discussion
MABP was selected as a well-established polymerizable
photo-cross-linker.[21–27] MABP was synthesized in high
yields in a one-step process from 4-hydroxybenzophenone
and methacryloyl chloride according to literature.[21]
Dispersions with different amounts of MABP were obtained
by emulsion copolymerization with MMA and BA according
to Scheme 1.
.
MMA MABP
L] [mmol] [g] [mmol]
.7 91 –
.6 90 0.381 1.5
.5 89 0.762 3
.2 86 1.905 7.5
.7 82 3.81 15
I: 10.1002/mame.201100401
H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim3
the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R
Scheme 1. Preparation of dispersion particles by emulsion copolymerization of MABP,MMA, and BA.
4
REa
www.mme-journal.de
E. Giebel, A. Greiner
In all polymers the molar ratio of MMA to BA was always
kept at 3:2. SDS was used as surfactant and potassium
persulfate as radical initiator. The experimental amount of
MABP was determined via 1H NMR spectroscopy. Disper-
sions with solid contents around 25 wt% were obtained. The
glass transition temperature of the dispersion particles was
adjusted just below 40 8C. Particle sizes were between 60
and 120 nm and the z potential of the dispersions was
between �55 and þ72 mV (Table 3).
The viscosity of the dispersion were adjusted for
electrospinning by addition of PVA in a weight ratio of
1:4 to the dispersion polymer. Electrospinning was
performed in a standard one-needle electrospinning set-
up with parameters as given in the experimental part.
Electrospun fibers were characterized using scanning
electron microscopy (SEM). No structural details of disper-
sion particles were observed for fiber samples, which were
composed of 0–5% of MABP (Figure 2A–D). Obviously,
the particles merged and formed smooth fibers despite
showing a glass transition temperature of 40 8C. The
formation of smooth fibers during green electrospinning
of polymers with melting points more than 30 8C above
processing temperature was reported before.[18] A possible
Table 3. Synthesis and properties of dispersions.
Amount MABP
[mol%]
Glass transition
temperature latex
polymer [-C]
Solid
content
[wt%]Calc. Exp.
0 0 39 23
1 1 35 23
2 2 36 24
5 5 41 26
10 a) 54 27
a)The polymer was not completely soluble.
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DOI: 10.1002/mame.20110
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinhe
rly View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, u
explanation is that water and surfactants
plasticize the polymer. In contrast, fibers
with uneven structure were obtained
with dispersions of higher glass transi-
tion temperature containing 10 wt%
MABP (Figure 2E).
After electrospinning the fibers were
cross-linked by UV irradiation. The cross-
linking process was monitored by
infrared spectroscopy. Excerpts of the IR
spectra after different times of UV-
irradiation time focusing on the signal
of the keto group of MABP at 1665 cm�1
showed a steady decrease of the keto
group indicating the cross-linking
reaction (Figure 3). No signal of the keto
group of MABP could be observed after 15 min UV
irradiation.
The influence of the cross-linking on the mechanical
properties was investigated by stress/strain experiments.
For the investigations fibers were collected on a rotating
wheel to obtain an aligned fiber mats. Before and after
UV irradiation for 30 min of each side of the sample the
E-modulus was measured. To prevent a structure loss of
the non-cross-linked fibers due to removal of the matrix
polymer the fibers were still containing the PVA. The
E-modulus was calculated using the effective area (Aeff) of
the cross-section. This area was calculated from the density
(r) after measuring the weight (m) and length (l) of the
samples by using
Aeff ¼m
lp(1)
�3
A hypothetical density of 1 g � cm was used for thecalculation. The results are shown in Table 4.
The fibers without MABP showed no change of E modulus
due to the UV irradiation. The E modulus of samples with 1–
5% MABP showed a significant increase after UV irradiation.
Particle
size
[nm]
Zeta
potential
[mV]
65 �55
76 �64
74 �57
78 �55
112 �72
0401
im www.MaterialsViews.com
se DOI for citation !!
Figure 2. SEM images of the untreated electrospun fiber mats (A) 0, (B) 1, (C) 2, (D) 5, and (E) 10% MABP.
Water-Stable Nonwovens Composed of Electrospun Fibers from Aqueous Dispersions . . .
www.mme-journal.de
The fibers consisting of the particles containing 10% MABP
showed only a slight increase of the E modulus which could
be explained by the incomplete merger of the dispersion
particles upon fiber formation resulting in a reduced degree
of interparticle cross-linking.
The thermomechanical stability of the fibers was probed
by immersion of the photo-cross-linked fibers in water at
60 8C for 1 h. Water was removed three times in order to
assure complete removal of the non-cross-linked PVA. SEM
images of the samples with different amount of the cross-
linker MABP showed that hot water treatment proved
Figure 3. Excerpt of the IR spectra of electrospun fibers containing5% MABP before and after UV irradiation at different timeintervals.
www.MaterialsViews.com
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DO
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb
Early View Publication; these are NOT
shape persistence for fibers with MABP but a significant loss
of fiber shape without MABP and thereby without cross-
linking (Figure 4). Fibers with 10% MABP became smoother
in shape but still showed an uneven surface in comparison
to fibers with less MABP.
After the test with hot water the same fibers were
annealed at 100 8C in an oven for 24 h. SEM images of the
annealed fibers showed a good persistence of the fiber
shape when MABP was present in the original fibers and
confirmed the results by hot water treatment (Figure 5).
Upon water treatment the fibers containing no MABP
showed a increase in fiber diameter, due to the flowing of
the polymer. The fibers containing MABP showed a
decrease in diameter, which can be attributed to the loss
of the PVA. Heat treatment resulted in a further increase of
the fiber diameter of the sample containing no MABP. The
Table 4. Change of the mechanical properties of electrospun fibermats due to photo cross-linking.
Amount
MABP [%]
E Modulus [MPa]
Before UV
treatment
After UV
treatment
0 140� 31 148� 20
1 175� 42 243� 51
2 176� 41 230� 26
5 162� 44 250� 50
10 166� 42 194� 32
I: 10.1002/mame.201100401
H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim5
the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R
Figure 4. SEM images of the electrospun fiber mats after photo-cross-linking and removal of the matrix polymer (A) 0, (B) 1, (C) 2, (D) 5, and(E) 10% MABP.
Figure 5. SEM-images of the photo-cross-linked electrospun fiber mats after heat treatment (A) 0, (B) 1, (C) 2, (D) 5, (E) 10% MABP.
6
REa
www.mme-journal.de
E. Giebel, A. Greiner
fibers containing MABP showed no significant change of
the fiber diameter (Table 5).
A nonwoven with an area weight of 11 mg � cm�2 was
prepared by using the dispersion containing 5% MABP. One
side of this sample was irradiated for 15 min. Figure 6 shows
excepts of the IR spectrum of the untreated fiber mat (a),
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DOI
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb
rly View Publication; these are NOT the final pag
compared to the IR spectrum of the irradiated side (b), and
the non-irradiated back side (c). The non-irradiated side
showed no change in the intensity of the signal of the keto
group of MABP compared to the untreated sample,
indicating that the UV light did not penetrate the sample.
Figure 6d shows the IR spectra of the backside of a
: 10.1002/mame.201100401
H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.MaterialsViews.com
e numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Table 5. Change of the fiber diameter due to water and heattreatment.
Amount
MABP [%]
Diameter [nm]
Before
treatment
After water
treatment
After heat
treatment
0 410� 120 654� 233 790� 265
1 646� 153 558� 169 597� 175
2 629� 157 536� 136 590� 209
5 571� 131 547� 109 493� 115
10 558� 277 447� 143 378� 94
Figure 6. Excerpt of the IR-spectra of a nonwoven with an areaweight of 11 g � cm�2 containing 5% MABP (a) without UV treat-ment, (b) irradiated side of a nonwoven, (c) non-irradiated back-side of a nonwoven, (d) backside of a nonwoven irradiated duringelectrospinning.
Water-Stable Nonwovens Composed of Electrospun Fibers from Aqueous Dispersions . . .
www.mme-journal.de
nonwoven spun in the presence of a UV source. The reduced
signal of the keto group proves, that combining electro-
spinning and photo-cross-linking in one step is possible and
will result in a homogeneous cross-linking reaction
throughout the fiber. However, a stronger UV source is
needed to obtain complete cross-linking.
4. Conclusion
Following the concept for cross-linkable dispersion parti-
cles for electrospinning, copolymers of MMA and BA
were successfully functionalized with UV cross-linker
by emulsion polymerization in water. The resulting
dispersions could be mixed with PVA and process to
fibers by electrospinning. UV irradiation of the fibers
www.MaterialsViews.com
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DO
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb
Early View Publication; these are NOT
resulted in intra- and intermolecular cross-linking as
proven by the persistence of the fiber shape at higher
temperatures in comparison to un-cross-linked fibers. UV
cross-linking of the dispersion-based fibers resulted in a
significant increase of mechanical properties and thermal
stability. Time required for UV cross-linking was in a
relatively short range and could be significantly shortened
for technical applications, e.g., by stronger UV sources. In
conclusion, for the preparation of smooth and stable
fibers by dispersion electrospinning low glass transition
temperatures and cross-linking is required, which can be
achieved with chemically bound cross-linking sites on the
dispersion particles.
Acknowledgements: The authors are indebted to the Bundesmi-nisterium fur Bildung und Forschung for financial support.
Received: November 15, 2011; Revised: January 20, 2012;Published online: DOI: 10.1002/mame.201100401
Keywords: dispersions; electrospinning; synthesis
[1] D. Li, Y. Xia, Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1151.[2] A. Greiner, J. H. Wendorff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
5670.[3] D. H. Reneker, I. Chun, Nanotechnology 1996, 7, 216.[4] Z.-M. Huang, Y. Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, S. Ramakrishna, Compos.
Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 2223.[5] S. Agarwal, A. Greiner, J. H. Wendorff, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009,
19, 2863.[6] D. H. Reneker, A. L. Yarin, Polymer 2008, 49, 2387.[7] Y. Zhang, C. Lim, S. Ramakrishna, Z.-M. Huang, J. Mater. Sci.:
Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 933.[8] T. J. Sill, H. A. von Recum, Biomaterials 2008, 29, 1989.[9] S. Agarwal, J. H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, Polymer 2008, 49, 5603.
[10] C. Hellmann, A. Greiner, J. H. Wendorff, Polym. Adv. Technol.2011, 22, 407.
[11] J. Gohil, A. Bhattacharya, P. Ray, J. Polym. Res. 2006, 13, 161.[12] Y. Liu, B. Bolger, P. A. Cahill, G. B. McGuinness, Mater. Lett.
2009, 63, 419.[13] E. Yang, X. Qin, S. Wang, Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 3555.[14] X.-H. Qin, S.-Y. Wang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 951.[15] S. Agarwal, A. Greiner, Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 372.[16] A. Stoiljkovic, M. Ishaque, U. Justus, L. Hamel, E. Klimov,
W. Heckmann, B. Eckhardt, J. H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, Polymer2007, 48, 3974.
[17] A. Stoiljkovic, R. Venkatesh, E. Klimov, V. Raman, J. H. Wen-dorff, A. Greiner, Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6147.
[18] J. Sun, K. Bubel, F. Chen, T. Kissel, S. Agarwal, A. Greiner,Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 2077.
[19] L. Buruaga, H. Sardon, L. Irusta, A. Gonzalez, M. J. Fernandez-Berridi, J. J. Iruin, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 1176.
[20] E. Klimov, V. Raman, R. Venkatesh, W. Heckmann, R. Stark,Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6152.
I: 10.1002/mame.201100401
H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim7
the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R
8
REa
www.mme-journal.de
E. Giebel, A. Greiner
[21] R. Toomey, D. Freidank, J. Ruhe, Macromolecules 2004, 37,882.
[22] M.-K. Park, S. Deng, R. C. Advincula, Langmuir 2005, 21,5272.
[23] H. Higuchi, T. Yamashita, K. Horie, I. Mita, Chem. Mater. 1991,3, 188.
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, DOI
� 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag Gmb
rly View Publication; these are NOT the final pag
[24] D. Matsukuma, K. Yamamoto, T. Aoyagi, Langmuir 2006, 22,5911.
[25] G. T. Carroll, N. J. Turro, J. T. Koberstein, J. Colloid Interface Sci.2010, 351, 556.
[26] J. Pahnke, J. Ruhe, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1396.[27] J. S. Kim, J. H. Youk, Macromol. Res. 2009, 17, 926.
: 10.1002/mame.201100401
H & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.MaterialsViews.com
e numbers, use DOI for citation !!