water-level changes 2000–2004 in the chicot and evangeline
TRANSCRIPT
94o30'
29o45'
94o45'
30o
95o
30o15'
95o15'
30o30'
30o45'
95o30'
95o45'
96o
30o45'
30o30'
30o15'
29o45'
30o
29o30'
96o
29o15'
95o45'
95o30'
95o15'
95o
29o15'94o45'
29o30'
94o30'
0 5 10 15 20 MILES
Lake
WEST
RIVER
SAN
JACIN
TO
FORK
Creek
CreekLake
LAK
EC
ON
ROE
Caney
Creek
WEST FORK
SAN
JACIN
TO
RIVERSpring
Creek
LAKE
HO
UST
ON
SHELDON RESERVOIR
Buffalo Bayou
TRINITY
RIVER
Cedar
Bayou
BRAZOSRIVER
BRAZOSR
IVE
R
BRAZOS
RIV
ER
Clear
Creek
CLEAR LAKE
TRIN
ITY
BAY
GALVESTO
N BAY
EAST BAY
WEST BAY
GULF OF M
EXICO
LIVINGSTON
SAN
BERNARD
RIVER
LAKE
WALKER COUNTY
GRIMES COUNTY
MONTGOMERY
COUNTY
SAN
JAC
INTO
CO
UN
TY
BRA
ZO
S CO
UN
TY
HARRIS
COUNTY
AU
STIN
CO
UN
TY
FORT BEND COUNTY
LIBERTYCHAMBERS COUNTY
COUNTY
BRAZORIA COUNTY
GALVESTON COUNTY
WH
ARTON
COUNTY
WA
LLER C
OU
NTY
FM 1696
I–45 State 1
9
State 30
Stat
e
State
90
105
FM 1375
State 105
US
59
US 290I–45
US
59
FM 1960
US 90
Sta
te 6
US 90
I–10I–10
I–610
I–610
US 90A
I–10
State 36
US 90A
US 59
I–45
I–45
State 6
US190
State150
FM
1725
Sta
te 6
FM 1960
State 321
US 90
State 146
US 59
Sam Houston Parkway
Sam
Hou
ston
Par
kway
State Loop 8
State 288
State 36
Sta
te 3
6
FM 360
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital data, 1:100,000Universal Transverse Mercator projectionZone 15
IN COOPERATION WITH THEHARRIS-GALVESTON COASTAL SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT
AND FORT BEND SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT
WATER-LEVEL CHANGES 2000–2004 IN THE CHICOT AND EVANGELINE AQUIFERS, HOUSTON-GALVESTON REGION, TEXAS
ByMark C. Kasmarek
2004
OPEN-FILE REPORT 2004–1407Approximate water-level changes, Chicot aquifer, 2000–2004—SHEET 1 OF 2
Kasmarek, M.C., 2004, Water-level changes 2000–2004 in the Chicotand Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galveston region, Texas
ROSENBERG
RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
HUNTSVILLE
NEW WAVERLY
NAVASOTA MONTGOMERYCONROE
KATY
DAYTON
LIBERTY
BAYTOWN
LA PORTEPASADENA
JOHNSON SPACE CENTER
ALTA LOMA
LA MARQUE
GALVESTON
HOUSTON
Loop 336
Line of equal water-level rise—Intervals 5 and 10 feet
Boundary of study area
EXPLANATION
20
Updip limit of Chicot aquifer (Baker, 1979; Universityof Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology, 1968)
Line of equal water-level decline—Intervals 5 and 10 feet
Line of zero water-level change0
-20
Well in which 2000 and 2004 water levels weremeasured
Figure 1. Map showing approximate water-level changes in the Chicotaquifer, Houston-Galveston region, Texas, 2000–2004.
TEXAS
Study area
REFERENCES
Baker, E.T., Jr., 1979, Strati-graphic and hydrogeologic framework of part of the Coastal Plain of Texas: Texas Department of Water Resources Report 236, 43 p.
Carr, J.E., Meyer, W.R., Sandeen, W.M., and McLane, I.R., 1985, Digi-tal models for simulation of ground-water hydrology of the Chicot and Evan-geline aquifers along the Gulf Coast of Texas: Texas Department of Water Resources Report 289, 101 p.
Coplin, L.S., and Santos, H.X., 2000, Water-level altitudes 2000, water-level changes 1977–2000 and 1999–2000, and compaction 1973–99 in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galveston region, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–094, 8 sheets.
Gabrysch, R.K., and Coplin, L.S., 1990, Land-surface subsi-dence resulting from ground-water withdrawals in the Hous-ton-Galveston region, Texas, through 1987: Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence District Report of Investigations 90–01, 53 p.
Kasmarek, M.C., and Lanning-Rush, Jennifer, 2004, Water-levelaltitudes 2004 and water-level changes in the Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper aquifers and compaction 1973–2003 in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galveston region, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004–1084, 13 sheets.
University of Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology, 1968, Geologic atlas of Texas, Beaumont sheet: Austin, scale 1:250,000.
INTRODUCTION
This report depicts 2000–2004 water-level changes in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers in the Houston-Galveston region (figs. 1 and 2). The Houston-Galveston region comprises Harris, Galveston, Fort Bend, Waller, and Montgomery Counties and adjacent parts
of Brazoria, Grimes, Walker, San Jacinto, Liberty, and Chambers Counties. The report was prepared in cooperation with the Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence District and the Fort Bend Subsidence District.
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has published annual reports of water-level altitudes and water-level changes for the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers in the Houston-Galveston region since 1979 and separate similar annual reports for the Fort
Bend subregion since 1990. Beginning with 2002, the separate annual reports were combined into one report.
GEOHYDROLOGY
The Chicot aquifer (in Holocene- and Pleistocene-age sediments) and the Evangeline aquifer (in Pliocene- and Mio-cene-age sediments) are the two primary aquifers in the Houston-Galveston region and are part of the Gulf Coast
aquifer system. The hydrogeologic units are laterally discontinuous fluvial-deltaic deposits of gravel, sand, silt, and clay that dip and thicken from northwest to southeast. The aquifers crop out in bands inland from and approxi-
mately parallel to the coast and become progressively more deeply buried and confined toward the coast. The Chicot outcrop, which comprises the youngest sediments, is the closest of the aquifer
outcrops to the coast, followed farther inland by the Evangeline outcrop. The Chicot aquifer can be differentiated from the geologically similar Evangeline aquifer
on the basis of hydraulic conductivity (Carr and others, 1985, p. 10). A weak hydraulic con-nection between land surface and the Chicot aquifer and between the Chicot and Evangel-
ine aquifers allows vertical movement of water into and between the aquifers; the aquifer system thus is characterized as "leaky" (Gabrysch and Coplin, 1990, p. 2).
The water in the aquifers is fresh (less than 1,000 milligrams per liter dissolved solids concentration) in the region, but becomes more saline in the downdip and
deeply buried parts of the aquifers near the coast. In the natural ground-water-flow system, water recharges the aquifers in the unconfined outcrop areas, moves
downward and coastward, and discharges vertically as diffuse upward leakage in the confined downdip areas.
WATER-LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
Water-level measurements used as the basis for these change maps were obtained by steel tape, airline, and from reports of well operators.
Most wells are pumped once daily, but some are pumped more fre-quently. Multiple measurements were made when wells were not
being pumped; however, antecedent conditions and pumping sta-tus of nearby wells were not always known.
Note: This change map was generated by contouring the differences between 2000 water-level data (Coplin and
Santos, 2000) and 2004 water-level data (Kasmarek and Lanning-Rush, 2004).
0
0
0-5
-10
-10
-50
0
0
-5
-5
-5
20
-10
0-5
15
10
255
1525
35
5
1015
15
10
5
5
10
15
10
2030
20
10
2520
10
15
1510
2530
5
5
30
35
4540
40
10
5
15
30
25
25 5
1520
20
3530
3540
-55
105
10
5
0
0
0
-30-20
20
5
20