water conveyance advisory committee

NOTICE of MEETING/AGENDA WATER CONVEYANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

A meeting of the Douglas County Water Conveyance Advisory Committee will be held on August 2, 2021 beginning at 4:00 pm. The meeting will be held at the Minden Inn, at 1594 Esmeralda Avenue, Room 306, Minden, NV 89423. The Water Conveyance Advisory Committee reserves the right to: take items in a different order; combine two or more agenda items for consideration; remove items from the agenda; and/or delay discussions relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Call to Order PUBLIC COMMENT (No Action May Be Taken)

• At this time, public comment will be taken on those items within the jurisdiction and control of the WCAC or those agenda items where public comment will not be taken as a public hearing is not legally required.

• Public Comment is limited to 3 minutes per speaker. • Please state your name for the record before you give your comment. • If you are going to comment on a specific agenda item scheduled for discussion and action, please do

so when that item is opened for public comment. • On an item that is agendized under “presentations” or “planning matters” with no action listed, public

comment is not legally required and any public comment on those items must be made at this time. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Take public comment) For Possible Action. Discussion on approval of Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Take public comment) For Possible Action. Discussion on disposition of July 12, 2021 Meeting Minutes. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. For possible action. Continued discussion on irrigation, drainage and water facilities which may be

impacted by a request to construct the Martin Slough Multimodal Trail between Minden and Gardnerville. This item was carried over from the July 12, 2021 regular meeting. No single address or parcel number is associated with this project. The trail is generally located along the Martin Slough from Lucerne Street in Minden to Chichester Drive in Gardnerville. The work includes one major crossing and one minor crossing of the Martin Slough, as well as several minor crossings of un-named irrigation ditches. The applicant is Douglas County. DP 21-0122.

2. For Presentation Only: US 395 and Toler Avenue Culvert Replacement Project introduction and discussion. Douglas County is working with the Nevada Department of Transportation to reduce the depth of water over US 395 near the intersection with Toler Avenue during a flood event. There is an existing box culvert that is proposed to be removed and replaced with two new box

Water Conveyance Advisory Committee Agenda of 2

culverts. The Martin Slough is the existing irrigation ditch that currently relies on the existing box culvert to cross beneath the highway at this location. The preliminary plans are included for review with the intent to solicit initial comments on the design concept that can be taken into account as the project moves towards final design.

3. For Discussion Only: Muller Parkway project status update.

ADMINISTRATIVE. Report of correspondence received since the July 12, 2021 Water Conveyance Advisory Committee Meeting. The correspondence will be identified, including a short discussion of the subject matter, the name of the sender, the name of the person to whom the letter was sent, and the date. No action will be taken on correspondence. CLOSING PUBLIC COMMENT (No Action) At this time, public comment will be taken on those items that are within the jurisdiction and control of the Water Conveyance Advisory Committee or those agenda items where public comment has not already been taken. ADJOURNMENT. NOTE: A quorum of the Board of County Commissioners or Planning Commissioners may be present at this meeting to observe the proceedings. The County Commissioners are prohibited from deliberating towards or making any decisions at this meeting. Notice to person(s) with disabilities: Members of the public who are disabled and require special assistance or accommodations at the meeting are requested to notify the Development Coordinator by calling at (775) 782-9012 at least 24 hours in advance. Submitted supporting materials are available, at a minimum, three days prior to the meeting. Members of the public may request an electronic copy of the agenda or the supporting materials by contacting the planning department at 775-782-6217 or by email [email protected]. Electronic copies of the agenda and supporting materials are also available at the following websites:

• State of Nevada Public Notices website: https://notice.nv.gov/ • Douglas County Meeting website: https://douglascountynv.iqm2.com/Citizens/Default.aspx

A copy of the finalized agenda is posted at the Minden Inn, 1594 Esmeralda Avenue, Minden, NV 89423.

mailto:[email protected]

https://notice.nv.gov/

https://douglascountynv.iqm2.com/Citizens/Default.aspx

Water Conveyance Advisory Committee Minden Inn Minden, NV 89423

Regular http://www.douglascountynv.gov/

~ Minutes ~ DRAFT

Monday, July 12, 2021 4:00 PM Minden Inn

Water Conveyance Advisory Committee Page 1

Call to Order

Attendee Name Title Status David Hussman Vice-Chair Present Russell Scossa Member Present Fred Stodieck Member Present Frank Godecke Chair Absent Barbara Byington Member Absent Jeremy Hutchings County Engineer Present Sam Taylor Deputy District Attorney Present Coleen Thran-Zepeda Clerk Present Russell Byington Public Present Bob Coker Public Present

Public Comment David Hussman: At this time, we will take public comment on those items in our jurisdiction control but not those items that are agendized. Is there any public comment? Seeing none, we will move to the Agenda. Approval of the Agenda Is there public comment on the agenda? Seeing none, public comment is closed. Fred Stodieck: I move we approve the agenda as mailed. Russell Scossa: Second. David Hussman: All those if favor say Aye. Fred Stodieck: Aye David Hussman: Aye Russell Scossa: Aye David Hussman: Motion carries 3-0; 2 absent. Approval of the minutes David Hussman: Minutes of the June 17 2021 meeting. Any additions besides the fact that it says I was absent, and I was here. Do I have a motion to approve the minutes as corrected? Fred Stodieck: So moved. Russell Scossa: Second David Hussman: All those if favor say Aye. Fred Stodieck: Aye David Hussman: Aye Russell Scossa: Aye David Hussman: Motion carries 3-0; 2 absent.

Regular Minutes July 12, 2021


PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. For possible action. Discussion on irrigation, drainage and water facilities which may be impacted by a request for a Land Division Application DP 21-0141 for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 251.91 acre parcel into two parcels, the smallest being 2.50 acres and the largest being 249.41 acres in size. The subject parcel is located at 651 Genoa Lane in the A-19 (Agriculture-19 acre minimum parcel size) zoning district in the North Agricultural Community Plan (APN 1319-13-000-007). The applicant is Bob Coker, Manager for Frank Settelmeyer Properties, LLC.

Item #1 was read into record. David Hussman: Is the applicant here? Do you have something you'd like to provide us a little background on your proposal?

[Inaudible]

Fred: Was there already a home there, Bob?

Mr. Coker: No. They just moved in middle of last month.

David Hussman: Jeremy, do you have something to tell us about this proposal?

Jeremy Hutchings: Bob was spot on. They have a house and they are throwing a parcel around it and it’s part of the larger parent parcel. Really the only thing here for ditch community, in my opinion, to look at is recording easements over supply ditches and I made that recommendation report. It’s pretty straightforward.

David Hussman: Can you point out the supply ditches that would need an easement?

Mr. Coker: Southeast corner of the property.

Russell Scossa: Are there current ditches going across that parcel now? On the little parcel.

Mr. Coker: Only on the back where we border with Park.

Russell Scossa: There is an existing ditch there?

Mr. Coker: Yes.

Fred Stodieck: Does the parcel irrigate now, Bob?

Mr. Coker: Yes.

Fred Stodieck: Out of that ditch?

Mr. Coker: It comes from David’s North and comes do West to our parcel. You will see the Big Ditch.

Coleen Zepeda: Jeremy, can you have the applicant come to the table so I can hear him?

Mr. Coker: When you head North it goes toward Byington’s, it goes through our property on the North side of Genoa Lane.

Russell Scossa & Mr. Coker discussed what ditch would have easements, pointing to the map.

Mr. Coker: It starts on Park’s property and then he’s got a ditch that goes East/West; then we have another one that’s on us. Just a little guy. Then Park’s goes to the West and then to the North which services our



property, South of Genoa Lane and our property on the North side of Genoa Lane until it gets to Russell Byington’s property.

Russell Scossa: So, it wouldn’t be on this property that you would need an easement?

Mr. Coker: What we would need on this parcel is the East West Little Ditch that services that particular area where the house is and North.

Rachel: That might not even be on the parcel. I think it borders the parcel.

Jeremy Hutchings: Russell, understand that the application involves both parcels.

Russell Scossa: Yes, that’s what I was just going to ask. The second part and I don't know if I caught it the stuff that you wrote. Are you asking for an easement on the shock ditch?? that goes…

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, I think normally we get the whole property, the 200 plus acres.

Mr. Coker: What exists there now?

Jeremy Hutchings: It doesn’t look like there is any easements that exist.

Russell Scossa: Obviously the problem is and maybe we can ask the neighbor that is here if he has any problem with it. It’s probably a historic prescriptive easement.

Fred Stodieck: Yeah, usually when those came into effect was when someone parcels like this and I don't remember ever having Settelmeyer parcel anything.

Mr. Coker: No, we did early on, we took, we call it the old place where Jerry was. We made that into a 19-acre parcel, separate from balance on the South side.

Russell Scossa: Didn’t you bring a map to the Committee that was everything North of Genoa Lane?

Mr. Coker: We did. It’s all fully irrigated parcels.

Russell Scossa: So that’s the only one, Jeremy, that you can see the Shock Ditch that needs an easement on it?

Jeremy Hutchings: Yes, I was a little unsure. That’s why I just made the general statement that if it’s any type of supply.

Russell Scossa: The bit ditch is on Park’s side.

Mr. Coker: Yes.

David Hussman: The William Slough Ditch?

Mr. Coker: That goes to Byington’s on their West property line.

Russell Scossa: There is another irrigation ditch going into your property, I guess?

Mr. Coker: That’s from us to us.

David Hussman: This is an internal or does this go somewhere?

(Discussion between the group, pointing at the map)

Mr. Coker: Yes, that’s from us to us. It gets serviced by our well and the William Slough.

Fred Stodieck: What sources all the stuff on Deer Run? Does that come through the William and over that way?



Mr. Coker: Oh, Deer Haven? Yes.

Fred Stodieck: That comes through the William and crosses by your house?

Mr. Coker: Yes. There’s a ditch on either side of Deer Haven. Runs South to North.

Fred Stodieck: That sources out of the William?

Mr. Coker: Yes, or we can take it out of the irrigation well. The only time they get any water is in the Spring runoff.

(Discussion between the group, pointing at the map)

Mr. Coker: (Pointing at the map) That services a bunch of properties on the other side.

Jeremy Hutchings: So, we'd have to get an easement there?

Mr. Coker: Why?

Jeremy Hutchings: Well if it's serving parcels downstream from you, you need to record that easement, right?

Mr. Coker: The guy to the North is the same guy to the South.

Mr. Hutchings: The guy to the North could sell to somebody else. So that's how you should look at it. Well usually would look at it, so if there's any downstream property or other person is getting some services that have any potential water right.

Mr. Coker: That’s true.

Russell Scossa: That’s the negative side of parceling, is you have to put some things on your property you might not normally have to do, but if it does service another property that can be severed or is already parceled into smaller parcels that might someday get sold out it's probably just a smart thing to do.

Mr. Coker: Your right. It just costs more money.

David Hussman: Any public comment?

Russell Byington: My only concern is that there are easements put on all the ditches within this map.

David Hussman: I will close public comment.

Russell Scossa: I motion that we accept this map as presented, with the addition of the standard 32 feet plus the top width of the ditch on the four ditches that go from South to North.

Fred Stodieck: Second

David Hussman: Any discussion on the Motion? Any public comment on the motion? All those in favor signify by saying Aye.

Fred Stodieck: Aye David Hussman: Aye Russell Scossa: Aye David Hussman: Motion carries 3-0; 2 absent.



2. For possible action. Discussion on irrigation, drainage and water facilities which may be impacted by a request to construct the Martin Slough Multimodal Trail between Minden and Gardnerville. No single address or parcel number is associated with this project. The trail is generally located along the Martin Slough from Lucerne Street in Minden to Chichester Drive in Gardnerville. The work includes one major crossing and one minor crossing of the Martin Slough, as well as several minor crossings of un-named irrigation ditches. The applicant is Douglas County. DP 21-0122.

Item 2 was read into record. Jeremy Hutchings: It’s the Martin Slough Trail that has been in the process for a while. I tried to identify the crossing as best I could because it’s really kind of a long longitudinal project. It's easy to get confused about where things are but generally the trail kind of parallels portions of the Martin Slough from last meeting we tabled it because there were some questions about noticing. I think Russell provided some noticing, David you provided some noticing and Barbara did as well, so we added those people to the notice. I did send downstream users, I see Russell is here in the audience, we never connected directly. I’m sorry?

Russell Byington: He never got noticed (pointing to Mr. Coker).

Jeremy Hutchings: Okay, so I mean we could table it again, I suppose. It's not a huge rush, if you think it's necessary. But we did notice everyone that we knew and that they said to notice from last meeting. I didn’t know Bob was on that list. I apologize.

Jeremy Hutchings described the project.

Sam Taylor: You might want to establish whether proper notice has been given as a precursor to going through the spiel.

Coleen / Clerk: Who was in question?

Jeremy Hutchings: Bob.

Coleen: Isn’t that Frank Settelmeyer North?

David Hussman: Yes.

Sam Taylor: I'm just saying that, for the record, you know it'd be good to get on the record that everybody who was supposed to be notified has been notified. Mr. Coker is here, but I don't know if he had advance notice efficient to examine the documents or the application to make an informed decision on it. So, if he was supposed to receive notice and he didn’t, we might want to re-notice it and then put this off to the next meeting.

Coleen / Clerk: The notice was sent to P O Box 395, Genoa.

Mr. Coker: That’s the right address.

Sam Taylor: Sounds like he did.

Jeremy Hutchings: Are you asking for a vote or do we ask Bob?

Sam Taylor: Ask Bob. That’s your address, correct, Bob?

Mr. Coker: Yes.

Sam Taylor: It was sent there, Coleen?



Coleen: Yes, it was.

Sam Taylor: Okay, is there anybody else that should have received notice that didn’t?

David Hussman: I see the names that I gave got noticed.

Coleen / Clerk: Yes.

David Hussman: Okay, thank you Coleen. Well, I'm satisfied that proper notice was given. Do we actually need a vote?

Sam Taylor: I don’t think so if all the members agree.

Russell Scossa: Yeah, I think since Bob is here. He didn’t get the notice physically but he’s here. There’s obviously not a good list on this system but I think the effort has been made. We should continue.

Generally, if someone is messing with your ditch and 8 of the 10 people get the notice, word gets out that something is happening. After last month’s discussion and the effort that was made after that, you could go another 3 months trying to figure it out. Like Russell said, there is very few people that actually have a right off of the Martin Slough. I think you have noticed them, in my opinion.

Sam Taylor: The standard is to provide notice to all the known downstream users, so if we don't know about them we can provide notice, so if the Board finds that we have notified all the known users then we can proceed and if our board does not feel that we have notified all the known downstream users, we might want to reconsider this and find out who they are and give them some notice.

Russell Scossa: I feel the efforts, been made, I feel comfortable with it.

Coleen / Clerk: It is also published in the paper.

Sam Taylor: Are we good gentlemen?

Fred Stodieck: I’m good.

Jeremy Hutchings: I did send Russell a set of plans. I didn't get chance to connect with you directly, but I know it's a busy time of year for ranchers, so I apologize that we didn't connect. I’m happy to try to answer any questions. I noticed my Engineer is not here, which he is probably still on vacation. I’m happy to take any suggestions. We are trying to get the plans finalized with one of our funding partners which is the department transportation through the end of the summer and we would start and do the ditch work after the irrigation season, so we don't interfere with some temporary problems downstream. But I have written into the bid documents that any, for instance, stock wiring is built in.

Russell Scossa: What kind of an easement does the County have? How are you getting right to do that?

Jeremy Hutchings: Some of the property we own, some of the property we have obtained easements for not only access to the multi model trail but also part of the project potentially is a fiber bundle for the school district to connect high speed fiber to Carson Valley Middle School. So, I have already obtained easements from current property owners that are already in place, as required.

Russell Scossa: Okay, so you negotiated the easements that you needed and it has a start and stop where the easements have been negotiated?

Jeremy Hutchings: They all have a legal description.

Russell Scossa: So, it isn’t something that just because it’s a Slough somebody decided to make a trail out of it?



Jeremy Hutchings: No. The main crossing is a box culvert 3 x 14 foot. It’s pretty substantial. I know, my Engineers designed that, for whatever flows that can go down that physically. That will likely take more than physically can fit in some sections of your ditch. It would flow over the top of your ditch.

Russell Byington: My biggest concern is a cleaning easement.

Jeremy Hutchings: The County will have to maintain this culvert.

Russell Byington: The Martin Slough is my only water. So anywhere along that that I can't get to it, because of that trail or because of (inaudible), I'll bring this up because of Kingslane. Kingslane, the trailers are right against the ditch. I don’t know who didn’t put easements in there and they put their fence into their property, on the other side of the ditch and at 395 there is not a single way, unless I get in there by hand to clean that ditch and the Town of Gardnerville will not accept responsibility and Kingslane will not accept responsibility.

Russell Scossa: Yeah, that was done before we were ever formed and that’s one of the reasons that we were formed because we started having problems.

Jeremy Hutchings: That is a problem.

Russell Scossa: The 3 x 14 tells me that it's kind of low flow, you know I mean it's not moving fast and that's the problem you have it Kingslane going across the highway.

Russell Byington: Technically it should take 15 second foot. Can’t get it due to the fact that they put in Judy’s window coverings and the Town of Minden wants to use the Martin Slough as flood protection. They just redid all the concrete over by the sewer plant.

Jeremy Hutchings: For this particular project, it’s a 24’ stick of pipe. It’s not very long.

Russell Scossa: Is there a thing you can write into this trial deal that the County is responsible for cleaning if the pipes silt up

Jeremy Hutchings: This is a County project so they are responsible for the construction and maintenance of the trail and part of that trail is the culvert. Hopefully, that would suffice.

Russell Byington: Over by Alton Anker’s place and by the Sheriff’s office, that all gets overgrown with willows. Getting in there is a son of a gun to keep the stuff out of the ditch and keep it clean. If you put a walkway on it, do I take my excavator down the walkway?

Jeremy Hutchings: Well, what do you do today?

Russell Byington: Right now, not much because I can’t get in there.

Jeremy Hutchings: Right, so here's my point Russell, right now afterwards we'll have a 10-foot-wide paved section two-foot-wide shoulders on the side, so it’s a 14-foot clear width that you don’t have today that you'll have tomorrow, maybe not necessarily for your excavator but certainly for a truck. We can talk about bringing in trucks to get your excavator down in a certain location, but I would argue that your access will actually be enhanced.

Fred Stodieck: How close to the ditch is it?

Jeremy Hutchings: It varies. The ditch meanders.

Fred Stodieck: How hard is it to get from the trail to the ditch if it’s 20 feet over there?



Jeremy Hutchings: Will the willows between us and the ditch it will be impossible. In some areas you will probably get a clear spot but in other areas it will be like a concrete wall, I mean you won't be able to fight your way through that.

Russell Byington: That’s all I want is wherever it's parallel, there is still the ability to get alongside of it and actually clean it. If they put the trail right on the ditch without a 32-foot easement or whatever else, there is no way to get in and get to the ditch if we don’t have that easement set back off that ditch.

Jeremy Hutchings: We won’t be placing obstructions there. It will be clearer than it is today.

Russell Scossa: What kind of easement do you have on there now? Have you historically cleaned?

Russell Byington: Yes.

Russell Scossa: With an excavator and backhoe? Where do you go with the spoils?

Russell Byington: Leave them.

Russell Scossa: If they put the trail close enough, that is something you will need to deal with.

Jeremy Hutchings: I don't think we're that close actually, it looks like there's least a little bit of distance.

Russell Byington: Town of Gardnerville is one of the biggest owners of this thing and their claim is they don’t deal with irrigation so every time they will put something in it's not there right.

Russell Scossa: Maybe you need to ask the County for an easement along this whole thing.

Jeremy Hutchings: We don’t have the ability to grant that. We have to get easements from these property owners so we don’t have the ability to grant the easement.

Fred Stodieck: Then they should scrap the project.

Jeremy Hutchings: With all due respect, Stode, we are not scrapping this project.

Fred Stodieck: It seems like for a long time the County was out to just, you know, agriculture is not important in Douglas County. So, they are going to do whatever we want. If that’s the case on this I think I’d buy a 235 with cleat tracks and drive up there and do whatever I had to do for maintenance. If it chewed up the trial, too bad.

Russell Byington: Going back to the idea of spraying. The whole idea of this trail is to give the people a place to walk, enjoy nature and I want an honest opinion here Jeremy, if they see me out there spraying after all these if you’ve had (inaudible) this and that, sue the shit out of somebody. What do you think is going to come back to us?

Jeremy Hutchings: That might be more of a question for Sam then the Engineer. I can’t speak to that Russell. Practically speaking, there is a lot of barking dogs out there, sure I suppose someone could say something theoretically, but…

Russell Byington: I want something written into this that you are not going to build fences to block us off because I see 2 or 3 years down the road just like we are doing to Bob, Bob sells it to someone else and we didn’t put that easement in, you can’t bring that piece of equipment across my property. Yeah, I can. There is an easement there. That’s what has happened, especially on this Martin Slough. It comes out and Judy’s Window Coverings, comes through goes underneath, goes through the Gardnerville ponds, past Alton Anker’s by the Town of Gardnerville. To get in there and clean anything and then people going in and messing with things happens all the time. Somebody put a box in there and nobody is claiming it. Somebody put a box by the



old slaughterhouse, then they put boards in and blocked the water into the wetland, instead of it staying in the Martin Slough and coming to me. I’ve caught that a couple of times. I mean this trail worries, is the people that are going to be around and you will not believe the trash we get by the time we're down on the end because they're walking with the power bar and there's the Martin Slough, toss it in there. It'll just float away.

Russell Scossa: So, they need cameras every 10 feet.

Russell Byington: I’m not against this, I understand it. There's got to be a protection for the downstream users and Bob didn’t even realize this, I'm damn near the only user anyone, except for Walker who wants to bitch and complain. At one point it bifurcates right behind Gardnerville Circle that bifurcates and takes care of the Town ditch which then takes care of the ones we brought up in the last meeting, the Hellwinkel’s, Aldax’s or Biaggi, Bacon that end of things and runs down County Road. The town has problems all the time because trash or whatever gets stuck in there. I want a well written who's responsible for what. I want easement through there. I want it written in there that agricultural processes will continue alongside if it so that, when we are out spraying, and I’m telling you know in return, I just cleaned from 395 to the Klauber Pond seven years ago, and you can't even see the trail that goes through there anymore, the willows and the rest and there's one guy on my rant I can't keep up the whole stretch.

Sam Taylor: We don't have the authority to grant an easement across somebody else's property. So, if you wish to obtain an easement for maintenance, that would be something you’d have to secure yourself. That’s not something we would do.

Russell Byington: But we do right now with this Board.

Sam Taylor: This Board had not authority whatsoever to force Douglas County to try to obtain easements over somebody else's property. If it's directly related to the project or where the project is located then, yes, but not for something outside of the scope of the project. We have easements where the walkway is. What has been discussed, though, is the easement in between the edge of the trail all the way to the Martin Slough, that is not something that Douglas County can grant you.

Russell Scossa: Let me ask this question. If what you say is true, but there's been a little lack of trust here, then, or maybe you guys didn't talk to the right people when you designed this project because all of the concerns that Russell just brought up, are real concerns. Now what the County could have done if they would have listened to these concerns before proposing the project. You guys obviously negotiated the trail easement, you already had the county ground that you could grant an easement to him on but you’ve negotiated all the other easements that you needed for this trail and your fiber optics or wherever else. You should have helped these people because they actually already have an easement, a prescriptive easement. The problem is, is the prescriptive easement isn’t any good unless it's blessed by the Court, I guess I’ll defer to Sam on that. The prescriptive easement is there. There is not a lack of easement.

Sam Taylor: There is a right of farmers, ranchers, users of water to maintain the ditches to serve their property. If you have prescriptive easement, you would have the right to access somebody else's property, so if for the specific purpose of maintaining the ditch that services your property. That does exist in Douglas County and you don't necessarily need to ask for permission because, correct me if I’m wrong, you were doing that, before right? You indicated that you're going through and doing it so nobody was trying to stop you previously from going and maintaining those parts of Martin Slough that abut this particular project. So, nothing's really changing from that perspective. I would be nice though if I may Jeremy, to have something for like an agreement that they could traverse across our easements for the purpose of doing that. Let me ask, are you ok with letting them use our easements?

Jeremy Hutchings: Not do this run his tractor down it.



Sam Taylor: If he has a backhoe will it be able to go across that trail?

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah but the other problem is the grant and what that grant allows It is pretty specific.

Sam Taylor: I think that's going the way of what you were saying earlier is our request should have included the grant.

Russell Scossa: What I’m trying to say is the prescriptive easement has always been there, now you know, we try, we spend a lot of time and I’m the last guy left who is a charter member of this meeting. It took two years before we started hearing these things, trying to develop this ordinance because you know there's a prescriptive easement but it goes back 100 years but it hasn't been a 32 feet right next to the canal, a lot of times they get in from this place, then they go around so these things could go into court for years trying to figure out where all the old stuff was and how you did it. I will defer to Sam, but a prescriptive easement is good until somebody questions it. Then we have to go to court to prove it.

Sam Taylor: That is correct but the issue at hand though here is to what extent would Douglas County grant you access, prescriptive or otherwise, across the easements we have for the Multi Modal trail. In other words, would you, Jeremy, recognize that prescriptive easement to cut across the easement that we have? Would we try to stop them is really what the question is? From maintaining it, as long as they weren't using equipment that will damage the path.

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, I don't think we're up to stop Russell from accessing is ditch and if he's to run down the ditch which I again it's going to make it easier for you to maintain it Russell it's not going to make it harder.

Russell Scossa: Let me ask one question from the length of the trail anyway, is there any place there, that you can just go completely along that slough without having to back out and go out through somebody else's property and back in?

Russell Byington: Yeah, technically I could be trying to get the access to one we've got it, I've got to call Mike Rippee to pull posts to drive through what Town of Gardnerville built out there on the deal.

Russell Scossa: Well, I would think with a prescriptive easement you should be able to just cut whatever's there and push it out of the way. Most people don't want to do that.

Russell Byington: Right, I don't want to go down that road. What I’m trying to say is and I’m going to ask you Mr. Attorney we're telling Bob he has to put an easement on his property because he’s building this parcel, you're coming here to build whatever you got rights to but at what point does it say you don't have to put in an easement or make sure your project doesn't go in those easements?

Sam Taylor: Jeremy was just indicating that he's okay with you going across our easements that we have to maintain your ditches or whatever, the Martin Slough. So, we're not denying you the access and I don't think anybody who owns the property between edge of our project and the Slough is going to deny you access either so were not really saying you are denied access. We can only grant you access or property we own. We cannot grant you an easement over somebody else's property so, we have an easement on somebody else's property and we only can get the easement extensively needed to do our project. If it was our property we'd be having a different discussion, but it's not our property.

Russell Byington: I fully understand that. I want it written in there, because all it takes is Jeremy to go wherever and do something different whatever else and try to find minutes in this board and the rest is a total nightmare, like the one I'm dealing with Judy's Window Coverings that did go through the Board. Unless it's actually specifically written that there is an easement, Douglas county is giving right-of-way or whatever else to. I can’t take an excavator, mine is a rubber track, but I mean what some stuff delineated clearly so that



when Joe Public, County Official whoever or whatever else or DCSO is coming because people call, I have something to go to DCSO and go get off my back. Within the law and rights of my agricultural permit.

Sam Taylor: Would you mind a reasonable condition or from the WCAC being that Douglas county will not deny reasonable access by downstream users to maintain the Martin Slough and reasonable access being Maybe you can find it, but just a reasonable access that does not damage the path.

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, I think that's fine. I think it's going to be a bigger question in most instances getting from that path through private property, Russell honestly to the Slough, in some instances it's not all that close. It kind of varies.

Russell Scossa: What's the farthest that you know?

Jeremy Hutchings: At least a couple hundred feet. He's going to have to go down the Slough anyway. In other places it's kind of parallel to where he's getting in from to put his spoils pile on, so it worked out really slick in most instances. It's a bit of a mixed bag, but yeah, I don't want to deny Russell his access to the Slough or to the trail and with a rubber tire backhoe it's fine. It's designed enough for truck traffic.

Sam Taylor: Right, we're not going to prohibit him from accessing it to maintain the Slough.

Jeremy Hutchings: Yes, and that condition would be fine.

Sam Taylor: Just say reasonable access that would not damage the trail.

Russell Scossa: This is where you kind of put the cart before the horse, because in your negotiations you could have helped these people by saying, when you were negotiating the other easement, you should have said, you know, do you realize there is a prescriptive easement here, and do you have any objection to us putting it in and that's kind of my recommendation now. I think we see plenty of problems with the irrigation stuff with this trail. I'm not going to vote for this project today because I think you guys need to sit down and see what you can work for a good access for them. I know there's things you can do and there's things you can’t do, but you already negotiated everything you needed for these property owners, all we would have to do is say hey there's already an easement there, will you recognize it? Let’s put it on the map and that's the map that he can take the Sheriff’s office. You know it's like hey Bob's got a little place like this and we just got four easements and that's going to make Douglas County’s life twenty years from now, a lot simpler. We should be doing the same thing for this situation.

Sam Taylor: Can I clarify what you're suggesting there? Are you suggesting that we get with a private party outside the boundaries of this project to do that, or just within the scope of the boundary of the project?

Russell Scossa: Basically, just within the scope of the project. You know, because that's what we hold all projects to the scope of their thing. It would be nice if you could do the whole thing.

Sam Taylor: Well, we can’t and that's what I was going to bring up to you. We can't negotiate the rights of a third party or private parties, on behalf of another private party and do that using government as a tool to do that. You are using the government for the wrong purpose.

Russell Scossa: You could be the catalyst or the coordinator that could put the two parties together that would recognize that there is one there and everybody can sit down and say Okay, there is one there let's define it and then we'll have something for the future.

Sam Taylor: But, that's not really something we do. Outside the scope of the project that isn't something the government can do. That's a private cause of action, a private right and we don't enforce private rights.



David Hussman: Are you telling us that Russell Byington’s only recourse it to approach each private property owner along the Martin Slough to get something that is acceptable to him for access?

Sam Taylor: Yes, that's exactly what I’m telling you outside the scope of this project.

Fred Stodieck: Just as a courtesy, I would think that the County should have done that up front. Just like Russ said here's our project and, by the way, there's a prescriptive easement over there, will you recognize that also. If you can't negotiate that or had Russell right there with you when you were negotiating that and the other thing I don't understand is you guys call it the Martin Slough Model Trail, it doesn't follow the Martin Slough. Well, I mean it goes from point A to Point B, but you said 200 feet away. How come it doesn’t go right next to the Slough? Just as a courtesy, I would have thought that, when the county is negotiating a private or an easement for this trail, you should have included the fact that this trail is the Martin Slough and the reason that this trail exists is because he has a water right down the stream on that Martin Slough.

David Hussman: That's exactly right.

Fred Stodieck: And this gets right back to what I said before, Douglas County says we're going to do this, the heck with agriculture and that's what I'm getting from you, we can't do that for agriculture, because the law says we can't.

Sam Taylor: That’s not doing it for agriculture, that’s not doing it because it exceeds the scope of authority.

Fred Stodieck: Agriculture is the reason these people are buying these parcels around here because they have this green grass to look at and cattle grazing so if he doesn't get water we don't have that agriculture anymore and here we are saying well the heck with that agriculture we're going to do this trail.

Russell Scossa: Sam, can I ask you a question? I see this as a fine line but you're telling us you couldn't interfere because it's not the government's job to do what we suggested, but the county took a big jump years ago for the privilege of putting a parcel on your place, they can tell you, whatever the hell, they want to make you do it. That's why we're putting easement on all these things it's because the county says to come here and develop, you have to recognize and 90% of these easements that this committees ever put on for people coming here before us were things that were just recognizing the prescriptive right that was there.

Sam Taylor: I’m not disputing that. But see there's a difference, a huge difference. What you're talking about is land parceling, you want to parcel your own property, you have certain rights to it, you can give to the County certain things. Okay, and so…

Russell Scossa: Somewhere the County decided they were God and …

Sam Taylor: That's how you have the roads to get from point A to Point B and that's how these things come about. Let's be clear about that. The difference here is we're not parceling anything. We're building something over somebody else's property. There's a huge difference between what you just described, the process you just described, and if it was Douglas county and it was Douglas county’s property, I think you would have a pretty good argument. I would agree with you actually. I would totally 100% agree with you, if it was all Douglas County’s property but it isn't so what we're talking about is just what I was proposing to Jeremy, what I would call a compromise, which is to have a condition in here that the Board would adopt that basically Douglas county would agree to give reasonable access across a multimodal path without objection in the event, you know for equipment that doesn't damage the path the strict purposes of maintaining the Martin Slough now from the edge of our pathway, where we have the easement all the way to the property where the water is, where you want to do work. That's something else. That is somebody else's property where you as a private home owner, whoever has a right in that ditch. He needs to go work it out with that person. Now if



that person starts to stop you from going and doing that that's when you end up in court, I mean I'm sorry but that's kind of like the process has been established. It isn't like we're creating new territory.

Russell Scossa: So, you're talking about just the pathway that you want this agreement for not for the county ground that is between the Slough and the pathway.

Sam Taylor: It’s not County ground.

Russell Scossa: There’s something here that said its County property.

Sam Taylor: Well, if we agree to allow you to go across it.

Russell Scossa: I think yeah at least throw that in there, that they can at least cross your path.

Sam Taylor: That would require Board action. If the Board approves this, right it's going to the Board, so if the Board approves the condition.

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, the project will go to the Board when we get to the final funding stage as approval of the contract.

Russell Scossa: So, basically what we're saying is hey you guys own some of this stuff from your path to the water, at least on that part let's recognize that there's a prescriptive easement there and make that portion of it [inaudible].

Sam Taylor: I wouldn’t have any objection to that.

Russell Scossa: That would somehow come back in a few years because the court is going to look at it say the county recognized, this guy that's objecting it, he's going to be on the low end of the stick. I realize there are things you guys can say. I think if this was up front and they were thinking about the pathway being an actual agriculture waterway, you should have included these people from day one, when you went to negotiate easement. If they just clarify the prescriptive easement. It’s too late now.

Jeremy Huthings: Russell, again I apologize. This project has been going on for about four years. I was actually on the design side, and so I wasn't involved in the initial negotiations.

Russell Scossa: I understand. That's what we're saying. You guys won’t be here 10 years from now.

Sam Taylor: Well that's what I was trying to say let’s do a condition. The County would agree to allow you to go across the multimodal path as long as you don't damage it and were not going to object. Which is really what you're looking for anyway?

Russell Byington: Kinda sorta. Jeremy, you just said trying to find or do whatever for your path. People didn't know this stuff existed so we can do anything we wanted. We are going to be in the middle of the public eye now. We are going to be front and center to every one of those people, biking and walking.

Sam Taylor: That’s something you have to face anyway regardless of where you do it.

Russell Byington: Ask Jeremy, he just made the comment. He had to throw things that he couldn’t see. People couldn’t see what we were doing.

Jeremy Hutchings: Well and a lot of times I think you still won't because the path is going to be far enough away that you're not going to realize there is a ditch there. I think the parcel the County owns where you'd actually access the ditch is not from the trail. It’s from Buckeye.

Russell Byington: That’s all I want is something that gives me some protection as it’s been brought up by this Board, this County doesn’t protect agriculture really great if somebody wants to throw a fit about it it goes in



front of the County Commissioners and they rollover and you don’t get your solar panels on your ground and you don’t get to move water how you want you, don't get other things. This is a problem that I see every time and it's been brought up and years now we’ll still be here. We’re not smart enough to give up. When everybody else in this County will have moved on to something else.

Jeremy Hutchings: I’m not sure what we even have the authority to give them to satisfy what he's looking for honestly.

Sam Taylor: It’s going to the Board and the condition is we grant them reasonable access across the multimodal path…that’s different…if you look to get the prescriptive easement across the multimodal path for the parts that DC owns all the way to the Slough, that's what I’m saying that might need to be a little more flushed out specifically across the property, because only the Board of County Commissioners has the authority to grant an easement across Douglas County property. Nobody else does. County Manager, nobody else. So, the prescriptive easement part of the language would need to be something that would, you don't have to set it out metes and bounds, we would just recognize, you have a prescriptive easement to go across the property to the edge. Reasonable access to basically do the thing. We can add that but that doesn't mean the Board will approve it and I hope you can understand that.

Russell Scossa: Doesn’t everything that comes through here end up being approved by the Board?

Sam Taylor: Not everything, No.

David Hussman: We're just advisory.

Russell Scossa: You guys have changed policy. When we started everything that came through here went to the Planning Commission and it never got to be legally on these maps until the Board of County Commissioners approved it.

Jeremy Hutchings: It depends. Some projects do go to the Board, like a Parcel Map goes to the Administrative Hearing Panel. Certain applications do you go to the Board of Commissioners certain applications stop at Planning Commission, certain applications stop at Administrative Hearing Panel and others like Design Review are staff level.

Russell Scossa: The stuff that gets put on this map is legal, right?

Jeremy Hutchings: No, not necessarily so, the easements we have will be legally recorded. That's the legal document. The plans will be approved by county and that becomes legal in a sense that it is permitted, but it is not legally in the sense that it gets recorded with a document number like a final map would. Does that make sense?

Russell Scossa: No, it doesn’t make any sense to me. The maps come through and they have ditches with easements on them, they have streets with widths and stuff.

Jeremy Hutchings: That is different. That gets recorded, those are Parcel Maps. These are improvement plans. Improvement plans don't get recorded.

Russell Scossa: Well, that’s what I’m talking about. Most of our stuff is Parcel Maps and stuff. But I understand and I have no problem with you guys asking the County if they, were going to find out where these five Commissioners site with this stuff. They should at least take the County ground and recognize that there's an existing prescriptive easement across that ground. We are done here today as far as I’m concerned because I'm not voting for this thing until you guys take that and ask that of the County Commissioners.

Jeremy Hutchings: Well, the only one we have the right to do is that first parcel, I think.



Russell Scossa: Didn’t you guys buy the Seeman parcel too?

Jeremy Hutchings: Well, that’s the one I’m looking at. So, it's an open ditch. We could take an item to the Board for ditch width plus 32 feet, but that's hell and gone from the actual alignment of path. There's no interconnectivity if you added 32 feet, you know.

Sam Taylor: That’s not what I suggested. What I suggested is just simply the County agrees not to ….

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, I understand what you are doing but that's something different than what Russell is actually looking for.

Russell Scossa: Yeah, what I’m actually saying is hey, why can't the County say yeah, we recognize there's an existing prescriptive easement there.

Sam Taylor: Because we can’t do that.

Russell Scossa: So, you have a County official don't recognize that somebody has used that Martin Slough for over 100 years and clean it and got water from point A down to Point B, as a legal entity of Douglas County you guys aren’t willing to recognize that there was prescriptive easement.

Sam Taylor: We don't have the ability to put a prescriptive easement across somebody else's property.

Russell Scossa: I’m not asking for anybody else’s property. I’m asking for the property that is in Douglas Count’s ownership, right now.

Jeremy Hutchings: You’d be putting words in my mouth. I see the Slough is obviously there on the property that we own and I recognize that it’s a historic place of use, as far as I can tell and Russell has every right in the world to go down and access his slough along that. So, no, I don’t agree with you Russell.

Russell Scossa: What I’m getting at here is this is why can’t you guys just say in the process of doing this project we're going to recognize that there's been a historic prescriptive easement and this Board in 1988 through 1990 decided that a historic prescriptive easement was 32 feet plus the top width of the ditch. Why can't you just write that into this map here somewhere that says cleaning easement or something? Basically, you are saying this isn’t getting recorded so it's not going to be a legal thing but it’s something he can take down and say hey this is at least one group that recognizes there is a prescriptive easement.

Jeremy Hutchings: It's not giving you anything more than he already has today.

Russell Scossa: That’s exactly, but it’s showing that somebody recognizes that.

Sam Taylor: Yeah, I would be uncomfortable putting it on plans, but this would need to be something, let me explain it. If we're going to do that right, the Board is going to take some sort of formal action, it would be done in conjunction with the approval of this project. So, you fellas say hey we're going to condition this on Douglas County recognizing that we have a, on their property limited to Douglas County’s property, that we want Douglas County to acknowledge that there is a right to access the Martin Slough for the purposes of cleaning it. That would be something that you know we could sensibly tie into what the approval of funding or something so that document would exist. So, you would be approving us or requiring us or asking Douglas County to take that process to the Board of County Commissioners which I think is not an unreasonable request okay. But, it isn’t something that we would be able to do on a third parties’ private property, because we Douglas County, the Board of County Commissioners can't put an easement on somebody else’s property. We don't have that authority.



Russell Scossa: Where you missed the boat is when you were negotiating the other stuff you could have said hey…

Jeremy Hutchings: I don't know if we missed the boat, Russell – sorry to cut you off, but there's only certain things that the funding source to allow us to do. It was an act of Congress to try to get the easement for the fiber optic. We had to get that thing completely changed to have a fiber optic exist over the easement for access that already existed.

Russell Scossa: That easement might be over these guy’s prescriptive easement. Someday if you put it in the wrong place their backhoe might…

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, but it's not an exclusive easement so that's doesn't necessarily conflict, but the potential to get beyond what that funding source allowed, DOT has to go back to each property owner for value in that is something I don't think is within the funding source. To get that extra no man's land is what we're talking about between the path and the ditch. I think it's a nonstarter. But if I’m hearing what you are saying, Sam, what you're suggesting is they craft the motion that when we take this approval in the item for the approval, I can write in my item that Douglas County recognizes on County property that Martin Slough downstream users have a prescriptive right to access it.

Sam Taylor: Well, I would be very specific with the parcel number and all that.

Jeremy Hutchings: Yeah, I'd have to double check there might be a couple of their little clips here and there, where we actually own property where potentially where the Slough crosses our property that we'd have potential to get them another spot. I’m just looking at the one right by Buckeye and the Seeman place.

Sam Taylor: Are you good with that?

Russell Byington: Yes, but I have two questions for you law wise. Does the County recognize the Alpine Decree? That is what a judge has already issued. Can the County tell the Town of Gardnerville and the Town of Minden or whatever else, that’s not private property now, some of that is the Towns?

Sam Taylor: The first one, yes, definitely we recognize this. It’s a court order so if you don't recognize that you'd be held in contempt. So, having said that, though, relative to the Town’s. The town's own their property and only the town board, just like Douglas County Board of County Commissioners, has the authority to determine who gets easements across their property. The Board can’t go in and start grabbing the Town’s property. There are certain delineations in terms of ownership that you have to respect because boy that would just create problems.

Jeremy Hutchings: There is some property that the School District has. Do we have any authority over them?

Sam Taylor: I don't know the answer to that of the top of my head. It depends on who is the fee owner. Do you know who the fee owner is? You would probably need the same permission from the School District Board, in other words, normally the way things are structured if you own, you own it and only you get to determine who has access to it. So, whoever is able to control property as the authority to say whether or not to put an easement on it.

Russell Byington: Were I’m very confused now is per the Alpine Decree, that 32 foot is already in there. The easement is already in there.

Sam Taylor: That’s what we are already saying. The 32 foot goes out from the Martin Slough. It doesn’t go from the Martin Slough all the way to the road if it's 200 feet, so you know you can't go grabbing that it's a question of how to get from the road to the Slough and whose property you have to cross to get there. That's what



we're talking about. We're not talking about your ability to take some stuff and throw it on the side of the Martin Slough when you clean it. That's a different sort of examination.

Russell Byington: That’s why I want to make sure that there's 32-foot clearance from this path. It’s my understanding that this path is going to touch the Martin Slough.

Jeremy Hutchings: It will cross it.

Russell Byington: That’s what I mean. Now I will not have the 32-foot clearance.

Jeremy Hutchings: But there's a difference between a use that is going to prohibit your use of you're right and the trail isn't prohibiting that use of your right. Putting a trailer in that 32-foot space, yes.

Russell Scossa: If he has a bunch of mud and willows and sticks in the middle of your trail somebody's going to object to that.

Russell Byington: I have to take my piece of equipment that I have historically taken because the trail isn’t allowed to take it.

Sam Taylor: Just an FYI, this is something that I want to bring this up and put it on the record now since we're talking about these sorts of issues, one of the things I was hoping we could do whenever we amend the code is to put in place certain restrictions from people putting in fences, buildings, anything. Right now, someone can go plop down a fence because it’s not subject to a building permit and put it inside the area that you need to access in order to basically maintain the ditch, right? You don't sit there and drive down the middle of the ditch to maintain it, you have to be on one side or the other, you know reach over with the bucket and grab in there, right?

David Hussman: Sam, I don’t think that’s correct. Historically, someone pulling a building permit that parcels already been corrected.

Sam Taylor: No, I’m saying fences. Fences don't have a building permit. If you have a home and it abuts a ditch and you want to go put up a fence you don't have to get a building permit to put up a fence. What I’m trying to say is I would like to make a change in code, where it does if your fence that you're getting ready to put up abuts a ditch so that you have to maintain the setbacks, so we can take a look at it and maintain the setbacks.

Comment from Mr. Coker: [inaudible]

Sam Taylor: They can build their fence, but they just can't build their fence, to the point where it restricts your ability to clean the ditch.

Sam Taylor: Our code says…

David Hussman: That’s what the easement is for and if someone builds a fence on the easement you have the right to go in and knock it down.

Russell Scossa: Our code says, you can build a fence across the easement when we're doing new parcels, but you have to provide the gates to go through.

Sam Taylor: Right and that's true.

Russell Scossa: I don’t think anybody wants the County to get into it when you build a fence.

Sam Taylor: It wouldn’t every time you build a fence, only when building a fence next to a ditch.

Jeremy Hutchings: Double Edge sword, isn’t it Russell?



Sam Taylor: If it’s on your own property and it’s your ditch that’s a different manner.

David Hussman: The only comment I want to make is I think we see a deficiency with the Ordinance coming through here. The project is a development, you can call it whatever you want, we are putting a path along the Martin Slough as a development on that land. Might not be a Parcel map, might not require a building permit, but I think this is a loophole in the ordinance and I think we ought to take a look at it at the proper time because Russell is not getting the benefit that a downstream user ought to get when there's a development adjacent to the ditch. That's my definition of a development so, granted it doesn’t qualify under the way the ordinance is written now but, I think what this project is it found a way around it, so that the downstream user does not get the benefit of an access and maintenance easement. I agree with these two guys, I think it could have been negotiated at the time, you got what 14 feet? What's the width of the easement that you got?

Jeremy Hutchings: The approved width is 14 so it varies again there's not a consistent width. Sometimes you know there's an angle, or something so it's takes like a triangular shape or generally it's probably a little bit wider than the improved width.

David Hussman: Ok. Well, I feel for Russell because he's in a difficult position and to me if I were in his shoes I would see this as an opportunity to get on paper, what he should have. Now, because it doesn't fit the definitions in the ordinance, I think that's caused the problem. I was part of, me and Russell and Fred and everybody trying to craft these Ordinances so that they work for everybody and I don't think this is something that we envisioned at the time. I'm personally not inclined to support this because of the issues you have with the downstream users. Until they're satisfied, I don't know what we do with it today. Do we can we pass it along with no recommendation? Do we say no, we reject this project, all together? I don't know I'm not comfortable voting for it today. Until Russell is satisfied, I don’t see approving this today. Unless he is satisfied?

Russell Byington: Yeah, I'd like to see the language, it says we're not going to take it in the shorts.

Fred Stodieck: Is it a grant? What’s the time frame?

Jeremy Hutchings: We need to get this built by the end of next year.

Or? (not sure who said this)

Jeremy Hutchings: There is no or. It’s going to happen and I understand your position, David, frankly and if you guys want to say whatever recommendation you want, I will still go forward with trying to get Russell as much easement as I have the authority to grant but we're past the point of renegotiating and I don’t think it would fit the grant any way to negotiate a wider easement on someone else's parcel.

Russell Scossa: Why are they telling you that you can’t include in an easement?

Jeremy Hutchings: The grant has the money.

Russell Scossa: I mean what, why are they telling you that you can't go, include in an easement. It's not spending their money in any way.

Jeremy Hutchings: I would if you had to procure the easement.

Russell Scossa: Nobody is asking for you to procure it?

Jeremy Hutchings: How else would you solidify if more then we already have? You'd have to get a legal description and exhibit over all the different parcels and then get the easements recorded by all the different properties owners. And so, there's a cost there, Russell, so that just wasn't part of the and I’m just speaking of something I guess I don't specifically know. I don't think its part of the original mindset of the project. Like David said, we just don’t own the land like a regular project.



Russell Scossa: The problem is that nobody thought of agriculture in this whole thing and what you're doing is putting this guy out of business. It’s too bad he has a conservation easement on half his stuff, for what's going on in Carson Valley today he could probably sell 200 parcels in the next year for a million bucks per parcel. You should just say goodbye, this is what you guys deserve. I don't know where we go either today basically I think you guys need to sit down, I think you have to take Russell or whoever else he can get use water out of the Slough and you should go to every one of these points physically and show him what you're doing because I can't understand this map. I don't know nothing about the Martin Slough to begin with but if this was on my ditch, I still couldn't go there and see if every one of these improvements is trouble free.

Sam Taylor: If we're just granting him access and agreeing to not restrict his ability to go across our property where our project is located and grant him reasonable access across that and then work with basically the folks in Douglas County Community Development going forward to give them some language for the parts that Douglas county owns, right and just recognize that he has a reasonable prescriptive easement across the property. To get to the Slough and basically clean it out and maintain it. Now, that is about as far as the County could go in any event, in other words, if you say we're not going to approve this because you got to go get all these easements for everybody else on private property...

Russell Scossa: I see a whole bunch of culverts out there. I don't know if they exist already or they are proposed.

Jeremy Hutchings: A mix of both.

Russell Scossa: You go up there and there's culverts it's all over the place. I don't feel comfortable knowing how big those culverts are because this is beyond my expertise to look at all these drawings and tell you whether it's going to work or not, so I think you should table this for a month and get with Russell or whoever else he wants to go with you and go stop and look at every one of these culverts that you are going to improve or do and make sure that they're not going to hinder his water and then, with what Sam said as long as he's happy that these culverts aren't going to be diverting water out where they're not supposed to be or they're inadequate and Sam can come back with the language he just was talking about the easement portion of it, I think I could support that. But I think we're premature of having these guys know exactly what's happening on that, so I think somebody from Douglas County needs to meet physically with them, walk them through this plan on that whole…it’s too important of a project, not to have it looked at and that's what I'm going to suggest that you guys meet with Mr. Byington and whoever else that you can find that might be able to get water supplied off here, where you can get some help with cleaning this thing and make sure they're satisfied and bring it back. I think we've hashed things out enough, I know those things which I think up front, even though your grant might say could have been negotiated somehow. Actually, the only thing that really would have, in my opinion, would have been good was for each property owner to say we recognize, there is a prescriptive easement that this has been used. Hey, that's going to help a guy if he has to go to court.

Jeremy Hutchings: Russell, I did call you a couple times about going over the plans.

Russell Byington: Yeah, I apologize Jeremy.

Jeremy Hutchings: Do you want to go out and go over these?

Russell Byington: Yes.

Sam Taylor: If you go out and do that, I would like to tag along.

Fred Stodieck: Didn’t this at one time go through the NRCS to size the culverts?



Russell Scossa: Arlen did it at one time, he had the NRCS expertise, but he was getting paid by Douglas County to be an Advisor. Then we turned it over to Douglas Counties Engineering department after Arlen finally left.

Fred Stodieck: When you go through this do you go from one end to the other and size those culverts to the maximum flow of what can get in there?

Jeremy Hutchings: Well, the sizing comes from the design engineer, which is Rob Anderson and then the County reviews that Stode and so, sometimes it depends on the culvert capacity, some of them are required to be 150% of capacity and sometimes frankly, the amount of water that irrigator says he can put down the ditch exceeds the capacity of that ditch and so you put in either what it can take, I'm just telling you the truth, or if it looks like it's a ditch that needs to be [inaudible] out and hasn’t been cleaned in a while we try to do that, but yeah generally.

Fred Stodieck: So, you've done this already on all these culverts here? There sized…

Jeremy Hutchings: Yes, like I said in my report there's two main crossings of the Martin that I can tell. But sometimes those ditches are like right next to each other, the tail water ditch and then the actual main ditch. It's hard to tell exactly what's what. Some of the other culverts you are seeing are either existing or they're coming in some unnamed ditch from some other remnant of either Alton’s pond or probably even Chichester's at the time, I think the Chichester’s before they developed all had a system is going through there that aren't supply ditch to the Martin. The one that I think Russell would want to see is the box culvert and the other minor crossing perhaps.

Fred Stodieck: I agree we bring it back next month and see what happens.

Jeremy Hutching: I was just going to take the denial and move forward, but since I'm trying to be an agreeable fella and well, I’m more than happy to table it until next month, and I will set up a time to meet with Russell.

Russell Scossa: What happens if we deny it?

Jeremy Russell: So, I’m wearing a couple of hats here. Both on the review side and it's the County's project, so if you deny it, even if it’s next month it's going to move forward and I'm going to do my best to still take into account everything we talked about here and get Russell the easements we can over the property that we own, and if you see something specific that in the design that he doesn't like, like the size of the culvert. we'll do our best to make sure we try to accommodate those conditions. I’m not out here to keep Russell from getting his water.

Russell Scossa: I'm just trying to understand, because when we first started, we always thought that we were advisory to the County Commission and we don't have any power except for advising them and they've always taken our expertise, but now you're telling me for a whole lot of projects the County Commission doesn't even know whether we said anything or not.

Jeremy Hutchings: No, I wouldn't characterize it that way at all, in fact, it goes quite towards the first thought. You are an advisory panel, and so, if you come up with something advisory for a project that you're not within your jurisdiction to grant or require, then I won’t require that of the applicant. I don't see that quite often, the way the code is right now, and the staff report that either Eric or whoever before me set up, where you go down kind of check through the boxes is pretty thorough. And so, if I see something in there that needs to be addressed, I try to put that in my report, but if you guys come up with something that doesn't seem in line with that or your authority, then no that doesn’t go in the conditions of approval, but I haven't seen that in the year that I've been here.

Sam Taylor: You guys are pretty good at staying in your lane.



Russell: Yeah, we understand that we always have the option to go in and argue in front of the County Commission. Now we don’t, you’re making the rule.

Jeremy Hutchings: No, you can still go. I would lay it out for them to and usually, when we do staff reports before the Board a lot of times they'll come up and say, what did this panel say or that panel say, sometimes we have our planning department come up and say this is recommended for denial and we’re still recommending approval and they don't always agree. That doesn't always happen, we do try to work things out before, because it makes it better if everyone's going along same track. But that's just not always the case and why you have the decision makers at those higher levels. I’m happy to table it and I have Russell’s number. I just have to find out a time that that'll work.

Russell Scossa: I think we're getting clearer to the fact that the County can put something in there and make it easier for him to use the path and hopefully can say that the County recognizes that there's a prescriptive easement across the County’s property.

Jeremy Hutchings: Can we ask the Board, Sam to direct us to go out and formalize the easement over our property for the approval? Is that out of line?

Sam Taylor: Yeah, but the Board still has to approve the easement so the language would be something that they take a look at. Normally those things would come up separately although it can come up at the same time, because again this isn't an application. We just have to figure out how do you get this in front of the Board. What other approvals do we have?

Jeremy Hutchings: If there's a site improvement permit but the Board action would be to approve the bid.

Sam Taylor: We could go separately just you know some point in time, Community Development could say the WCAC recommended and asked that we grant a prescriptive easement across our property and that would be something that could come up separately. We would need some sort of formal action normally from you guys saying we move, you know, to have this sort of thing happen.

Jeremy Hutchings: So, they move to direct me to put that on the Board agenda and table the rest of it till after I get to meet Russell is what I’m hearing.

Sam Taylor: If you want him to get going now on the easement, you would basically do what Jeremy just suggested.

Russell Scossa: That’s fine. I can do that. We will table the rest of it.

David Hussman: Can we split it up like that?

Sam Taylor: No, in your motion you just say we agree to postpone this portion of the project and we also move the Jeremy work on getting the easement which is a condition of approval of this project.

Russell Scossa: Ok, I approve that.

Sam Taylor: I guess I did provide you that language, didn’t I?

David Hussman: You made a suggestion and he approved it.

Fred Stodieck: I second it.

David Hussman: Is there public comment on the motion? Seeing none, all those in favor signify by saying Aye.

Fred Stodieck: Aye David Hussman: Aye Russell Scossa: Aye



David Hussman: Motion carries 3-0; 2 absent.

Coleen / Clerk: Was that part of that continued to a date certain I couldn't hear it?

Jeremy Hutchings: Next meeting, next month.

Coleen / Clerk: August 2, is pretty soon so I'm just wondering, Sam this might be a question for you about noticing. If it goes to a date certain, do I have to read notice everybody?

Sam Taylor: You don't have to re-notice everything if it’s a date certain.

Coleen / Clerk: So, for the August 2 meeting, are you able to do what you need to do by then?

Jeremy Hutchings: Yes.

3. For Discussion Only: Muller Parkway project status update.

Jeremy Hutchings: Yes, we did interview a Construction manager and hire one and the name escapes me so it's moving forward and that's basically the big update. Once we get them on board it will start moving forward a bit quicker. We know we will go to the Upper Allerman Committee in September. So, we are just trying to keep you guys posted to in the loop. 30% of the designs are complete. I’m happy to answer any questions or concerns. I’m getting stuff down up front, Russell. This is the same thing. This is a road going through and we have right-of-way on some properties. There’re some ditches there, so in this case, we would be able to grant easements where it crosses, I suppose, when needed. Any concerns or questions?

Fred Stodieck: This is basically all going across Park’s ground, right? When Anderson and Nevis owned it, they parceled everything.

Russell Scossa: They didn't come in here. They did that stuff before we were formed.

Jeremy Hutchings: There is right-of-way that cuts through Park’s.

Fred Stodieck: When they parceled all that ground out there, they had to go to the county to get the approval, right?

(Discussion back and forth between the group)

Russell Scossa: We didn’t start having meetings until 1990/91. There’re no ditch easements out there. The whole thing is a mess. The decree says Dangberg Ditch System. That’s how all of Heybourne Road gets their water.

Fred Stodieck: So, unless it’s on a map, nobody knows where it is.

Jeremy Hutchings: David Park is really integral in that area. The Specific Plan is in that area so he’s been integral in our conversations. We are still working with him to make sure he’s getting his water.

Russell Scossa: That's good because you're including other people that have some knowledge. The big problem you got to keep remembering with this thing, that Heybourne group that has real junior water rights all comes through Dangberg’s in some way, so the problem is most of the people that knew how it came 50 years ago they might have changed things now. As long as you get one that works for everybody that's what you're going to have to put the record on.



Fred Stodieck: Yeah there's going to be a big mess on the on the home stream one of these days, because there's a water right for Herbig. Park has been at leasing in it for probably 18 years or.

Russell Scossa: The year before Domingo left, that’s when they leased it.

Fred Stodieck: A lot of the ditches are closed up. That’s going to be a mess.

Administrative David Hussman: Report of correspondence received since June 7 2021. Does anyone have anything? Hearing none; this is closed. Does anyone have any closing public comment? Hearing none; public comment is closed we're adjourned. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 5:46 pm. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ David Hussman Vice-Chair ________________________ Coleen Thran-Zepeda Development Coordinator

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1594 Esmeralda Avenue, Minden, Nevada 89423

Jeremy Hutchings, P.E.

County Engineer [email protected]

775.782.9063 www.douglascountynv.gov

To: Water Conveyance Advisory Committee From: Jeremy J. Hutchings PE, County Engineer Date: July 23, 2021 Subject: DP 21-0122 Martin Slough Trail Project Review & Recommendations

20.100.070 Irrigation facilities.

A. If proposed development includes or directly impacts existing irrigation facilities, an irrigation plan must be prepared by a registered engineer to analyze and provide mitigation for the impacts of the proposed development. The irrigation plan, together with the drainage plan for the development, must be publicly noticed per section 20.20.030 and presented to the water conveyance advisory committee for their review and written comment to the community development department and to any affected towns or districts.

1. The plan must include the location, size, and capacity of all drainage and irrigation facilities within the proposed area of development. In addition, the plan must address upstream areas and facilities tributary to the site and downstream from the site which will be affected or impacted by the proposed development to the point of discharge.

Satisfies Requirement Does Not Satisfy Requirement

Not Applicable To Be Determined

Discussion: 1. A narrative and technical drainage memorandum were prepared demonstrating the capacity of the

conveyances proposed at the main ditch crossings. At the request of the board, only the narrative summary and plans have been included in the board packet.

2. In all development, the impact on downstream facilities and lands must be analyzed and addressed in the plan. New development is responsible for either improving downstream drainage facilities to meet the increased peak flows as a result of the proposed project or to provide facilities which will result in no increase in peak runoff from that which existed before the development. If downstream peak flows are increased by the project, the plan must provide mitigation to the point of discharge as approved by the county and any affected towns and districts.



Discussion: 1. The project involves a narrow longitudinal paved trail. The increase in run-off is negligible.

3. The plans must incorporate water quality and erosion controls in conformance with the Handbook of Best Management Practices for all drainage water leaving the site. The use of irrigation ditches or sloughs for the discharge of urban runoff is highly discouraged and in no case will be permitted without the written notice to, and reasonable efforts to obtain consent of, the affected downstream

http://www.douglascountynv.gov/

2 | P a g e

ditch users. In no case may urban drainage leaving a development be of a quality that will adversely affect downstream water uses.



Discussion: 1. Due to the nature of the project, a negative impact on water quality is not anticipated.

4. As a part of the plan, a ditch may be redesigned or upgraded for low maintenance through the use of riprap, channel lining, culvert or pipe. Landscaping of ditch easements in an urban setting is permitted as part of an approved plan of the water conveyance advisory committee, but must not inhibit the integrity of the ditch bank or the intended maintenance and access function of the ditch easement.



Discussion: 1. Landscaping of ditches is not proposed. Riprap is proposed at the entrance and exit of the main

Martin Slough crossing (14’x3’ box culvert).

B. No development may interfere with the historic custom and use of waters adjacent to and upstream and downstream from the development. Any changes in conveyance facilities or the course of conveyance facilities, including the abandonment of part or all of a conveyance facility, must be done in a reasonable manner with due regard to the rights of the owners of the easement or right-of-way and shall be subject to approval of the water conveyance committee, the county, any affected towns or districts or irrigation companies.



Discussion: 1. None.

C. Standards. Except as set forth herein, all improvements for drainage and irrigation facilities shall be in conformance with this title and the design criteria and improvement standards manual.




D. Rights-of-way for water conveyance. All development subject to this title must designate irrigation and drainage rights-of-way or easements as required to implement the approved irrigation and drainage plan for the development. Right-of-way widths must be appropriate for the operation and maintenance of the facilities as shown on the approved plan. Required right-of-way widths will vary depending on the size, type, location and accessibility of the improvements as shown on the plan. In no case shall the rights-of-way be less than 20 feet in width. For open irrigation ditches, a right-of-way width equal to the top width of the ditch plus 32 feet must be provided to allow adequate access for maintenance and servicing of the ditch. A minimum 20-Foot right-of-way must be provided, including cases where the irrigation or drainage is placed in an underground conveyance. These criteria for rights-of-way and piping for irrigation must be met unless otherwise provided by the design criteria and improvement standards manual and approved by the water conveyance advisory committee.



3 | P a g e

Discussion: 1. The County does not own the property at the main ditch crossing locations, and therefore cannot

grant easements at these locations.

E. Where the development contains lots of one net acre or less the right-of-way for an open irrigation or drainage ditch may not be included in the net or gross lot area.



Discussion: 1. Net and gross parcel area is not applicable to the project.

F. Maintenance. When water conveyances are placed in an underground culvert or pipe, the plans must address and provide for maintenance of the facilities.

1. If the underground facilities lie under a street or alley dedicated for public use, the town, general improvement district, or other governmental entity in whose jurisdiction the street or alley is located is responsible for maintenance of trash racks, sand and oil separators and the pipe or culvert.



Discussion: 1. Douglas County will maintain the ditch crossings.

2. If the underground facilities cross private property, then the private property owner is responsible for maintenance of trash racks, sand and oil separators and routine maintenance of the pipe. When such property is subdivided, the subdivider shall provide security or other adequate assurances for continuing maintenance.




3. When underground facilities cross a combination of public and private property, responsibility for maintenance will be shared by the private and public entities upon whose property the facilities are located. In the absence of a written agreement to the contrary, shares of the costs of maintenance will be in direct relationship with the length of the pipe within such private or public property.




4. If the person or entity responsible for maintenance fails or refuses to conduct such maintenance, then the downstream user may enter upon such property and perform the maintenance. The person or entity responsible for maintenance will be liable to the downstream user for the reasonable costs of the maintenance, plus interest, attorneys’ fees and court costs.




5. The county, on recommendation of the water conveyance advisory committee, may require the developer or property owner, as a condition of development approval, to estimate the annual cost of routine maintenance, and post security to pay for the maintenance, in advance, for a period not to

4 | P a g e

exceed twenty years. In the event security is required and posted, the developer or property owner, as the case may be, or its successor in interest, shall be entitled to a proportionate release of the security on an annual basis after the maintenance is performed. If the developer, property owner or successor fails or refuses to conduct the maintenance, then the downstream user may perform the maintenance, in which case the downstream user shall have recourse to the security for reimbursement of the reasonable costs of the maintenance. Recourse to the security shall not be an exclusive remedy, and does not prevent the downstream user from bringing an action for the balance due, plus reasonable costs, attorneys’ fees, and interest. (Ord. 1036, 2003; Ord. 1012, 2002; Ord. 763, 1996; Ord. 539, 1991; Ord. 390, 1981).



Discussion: 1. The project is not developer-driven.

20.100.080 Irrigation facilities standards.

A. Standards. All ditch rights-of-way must be provided access for maintenance in accordance with these standards and restrictions:

1. Cross fencing of ditches on parcels of 20 net acres and greater may be permitted upon recommendation of the water conveyance advisory committee.




2. Lots or parcels of less than 20 net acres must not be designed to require cross fencing of the ditch.




3. On parcels of less than 20 net acres, livestock access to the ditch right-of-way may be permitted as long as the integrity of the ditch bank is maintained.




4. Where ditch rights-of-way are cross fenced there must be a 16-foot-wide metal gate providing continuous access for ditch maintenance.



Discussion: 1. Cross fencing of ditches is not proposed.

5. Where a project creates parcels or lots of one acre or less, underground piping for irrigation and storm drainage must be required, unless otherwise approved by the water conveyance advisory committee.


5 | P a g e



6. Where a road or driveway intercepts a ditch and its construction would restrict or prohibit access along the ditch, ramps or other facilities as approved on the drainage and irrigation plan must be provided for both the upstream and downstream faces to facilitate access by ditch maintenance vehicles.




7. The culvert installed in a ditch or ditch crossing installed as a consequence of a subdivision or parcel map must be capable of passing 150 percent of the hydraulic capacity of the ditch up to the capacity of a 48-inch culvert. Beyond the capacity of a 48-inch culvert, the culvert must be capable of passing 100 percent of the hydraulic capacity of the ditch. The installation must not change velocity in any manner which increases erosion. Erosion controls may be required to the satisfaction of the water conveyance advisory committee.



Discussion: 1. The ditch crossings are not being installed as a consequence of a division of land.

8. Piping of ditches exclusive of road, street, alley, or driveway crossings must be capable of passing at least 150 percent of the hydraulic capacity of the ditch, up to the capacity of a 48-inch pipe. Beyond the capacity of a 48-inch pipe, the pipe must be capable of passing 100 percent of the hydraulic capacity of the ditch. Piped ditches must have manholes and other points of access to provide for routine maintenance and cleaning in accordance with the design manual. The installation must not change velocity in any manner which increases erosion. Erosion controls may be required to the satisfaction of the water conveyance advisory committee. The committee may recommend, and the final decision maker may allow, variations in the capacity of the pipe to not less than 100% of the hydraulic capacity of the ditch when supported by sound engineering principles and practical consideration.



Discussion: 1. Conveyances of the ditches match (or exceed) either the physical capacity of the existing ditch or a

limiting downstream constraint such as an existing culvert.

9. When a culvert greater than 24 feet in length is installed as a consequence of subdivision or a parcel map there must be a trash rack installed on the upstream side. The trash rack must be constructed in compliance with the Standard Details for Public Works Construction.



Discussion: 1. The box culvert at the main crossing is 24-Ft and therefore a trash rack is not required. The other

culverts are either less than 24-Ft in length or are serving drainage and not irrigation.

6 | P a g e

10. A development which is entitled to water from a ditch must provide a head gate and measuring device diversion structure in the ditch, approved by the federal water master or the state engineer.




11. A development which is entitled to water from a ditch must form a homeowner’s association which will be obligated to their proportionate share of the ditch’s maintenance.




12. For any development with lots ten acres in size or smaller which are entitled to irrigation water, the developer must provide an irrigation management plan which designates administrative responsibility. The drainage or irrigation plan must show how water will be supplied to and tailwater collected for each lot within the development.




13. Where a ditch is piped, where water rights are transferred from a ditch or where drainage goes into a ditch, there must be a continuing responsibility to pay a proportionate share of the costs of ditch maintenance, which can be calculated in terms of the actual costs of ditch maintenance or as though the water rights were still delivered through the ditch by the owner of the water rights. This is required until a change is approved either by all parties holding water rights in the ditch or by the water conveyance advisory committee.



Discussion: 1. Douglas County will be maintaining the irrigation crossings.

B. Use of the ditch right-of-way for the storage or disposal of wood, debris, garbage or other waste or any other use of the right-of-way area which impedes the access along or maintenance of the ditch is prohibited. (Ord. 1012, 2002; Ord. 763, 1996; Ord. 539, 1991; Ord. 390, 1981).




7 | P a g e GENERAL DISCUSSION:

At the direction of the WCAC board from the July meeting, the staff (which is also the applicant for this project) has met on-site with the main downstream user Mr. Russell Byington on July 16th, 2021 to review the project in more detail. The visit included inspection of the location where the proposed trail alignment crosses the Martin Slough as well as walking the trail alignment north of Zerolene Road where the trail abuts the slough. Additionally, staff provided Mr. Byington with a Google Earth KMZ file that showed the approximate location of the trail alignment (see red line in photo below) in relation to the Martin Slough (blue line). Mr. Byington was satisfied that the box culvert proposed at the crossing of the slough would be adequate. The main point of concern was maintenance of the ditch where the trail abuts the slough. We walked from Zerolene Road north to the control box where the Martin Slough and trail alignment diverge (approximately 1,370-ft). Mr. Byington expressed concern that the maintenance activities may be more problematic due to the heightened public visibility caused by the trail as well as the practicality of getting maintenance equipment between the trail and the slough. Staff suggested that perhaps the County’s stormwater division could maintain this stretch of the slough (as shown in picture below). This idea seemed agreeable to Mr. Byington. When asked, Mr. Byington estimated that the last time this stretch of the slough was maintained was at least four years ago and thought it would be reasonable if the County could clear the ditch of willows and sediments every other year. Staff has met with Courtney Walker from the Public Works Department’s stormwater division on July 22, 2021 to review the possibility of their crews maintaining this stretch of the slough. Courtney was agreeable to the maintenance idea. Staff has also reviewed the issue with the director of Public Works Mr. Phil Ritger. Phil was also agreeable to the maintenance idea. Based on this initial feedback, staff would like to explore the possibility of the County maintaining this stretch of the Martin Slough further to help alleviate Mr. Byington’s maintenance concerns. This would include discussion at the Internal Review Committee meeting and ultimately approval by the Board of County Commissioners.

8 | P a g e STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends approval of DP 21-0122 with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall dedicate an irrigation and drainage easement over all irrigation improvements located on

APN: 1320-29-301-007 and serving downstream users as noted below. This condition shall only apply to the parcel the applicant owns and therefore has the authority to grant such an easement.

a. Open ditch. Easement width shall be a minimum of 32-Ft plus the top width of ditch. b. Underground conveyance. Easement width shall be a minimum of 20-Ft.

2. Direct staff to make a good faith effort to develop a maintenance agreement between the County and the users of Martin Slough downstream of Zerolene Road. At a minimum, the maintenance agreement should speak to the nature of the maintenance activities, the area to be maintained and the schedule. The agreement would ultimately require approval by the Board of County Commissioners.

For Discussion Only

US Hwy 395/Toler Ave Box Culverts Project

Preliminary Plans

Water Conveyance Advisory Committee

8-2-2021

C

A

LL

8

1

1

B

EFO

R

E

Y

O

U

D

I

G

RE

VIE

W S

ET

- 0

7.1

9.2

02

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1" = 40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEETS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET:

AutoCAD SHX Text

OF:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Y:\Client Files\0110\0110-123\CAD\Engineering\Improvement Plans\0110-123-C1.dwg 7/16/2021 9:58:06 AM James Turner 7/16/2021 9:58:06 AM James Turner7/16/2021 9:58:06 AM James Turner James TurnerJames Turner

AutoCAD SHX Text

RENO 9060 Double Diamond Pkwy, Unit 1B Reno, NV 89521 p 775.782.2322 f 775.782.7084

AutoCAD SHX Text

MINDEN 1603 Esmeralda Ave P.O. Box 2229 Minden, NV 89423 p 775.782.2322 f 775.782.7084

AutoCAD SHX Text

WWW.ROANDERSON.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.S. HWY 395/TOLER AVE BOX CULVERTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEVADA

AutoCAD SHX Text

JT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SG

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"=40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

07.19.2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

0110-123

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE PLOT STAMP

AutoCAD SHX Text

C1

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1" = 40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

80'

AutoCAD SHX Text

COVER SHEET

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.S. HWY 395

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOLER AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

1320-33-402-087 VILLAGE MOTEL LLC

AutoCAD SHX Text

1320-33-402-089 GARDNERVILLE, TOWN OF

AutoCAD SHX Text

1320-33-402-059 DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-029 STAHL, MARTIN L & LUDIMILLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-013 1380 GARDNERVILLE LLC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CIVIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAGASEKHAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

R. GORLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

V

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

Exp: 6/30/23

AutoCAD SHX Text

IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR U.S. HWY 395/TOLER AVENUE BOX CULVERTS /TOLER AVENUE BOX CULVERTS TOLER AVENUE BOX CULVERTS DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEVADA

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1" = 1000'

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text

TITLE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.S. HWY 395 / TOLER AVE. BOX CULVERT

AutoCAD SHX Text

APPLICANT/OWNER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY

AutoCAD SHX Text

P.O. BOX 218

AutoCAD SHX Text

33

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

13 NORTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWNSHIP:

AutoCAD SHX Text

20 EAST

AutoCAD SHX Text

RANGE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

MINDEN, NV 89423

AutoCAD SHX Text

APPLICATION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROJECT LOCATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOOD ZONE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

PUBLIC FACILITIES (PF)

AutoCAD SHX Text

ZONING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

AutoCAD SHX Text

MASTER PLAN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY

AutoCAD SHX Text

MINDEN GARDNERVILLE SANITATION DISTRICT

AutoCAD SHX Text

C1 - COVER SHEET C2 - LEGEND, ABBREVIATION & NOTES C3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS, DEMOLITION & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C4 - BOX CULVERT PLAN AND PROFILE C5 - DETAILS C6 - DETAILS

AutoCAD SHX Text

ZONE 'AE' & ZONE 'AE FLOODWAY' PER FIRM MAP 32005C0253H REVISED JUNE 15, 2016

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOLER AVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

US 395

AutoCAD SHX Text

US 395

AutoCAD SHX Text

APN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

1320-33-402-089, 1220-04-101-029

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROJECT SUMMARY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET INDEX

AutoCAD SHX Text

APPROVALS

AutoCAD SHX Text

VICINITY MAP

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROPERTY LOCATION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

1395 N HWY 395

AutoCAD SHX Text

1411 MISSION ST

AutoCAD SHX Text

GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-015 CAULEY, LYNNE L TTEE

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-016 IRANI, SUSAN TTEE

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-017 KATSARIS, SHARYON

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-018 WITHROW, MARC R & GREGG V TTEE

AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-023 WAKIMOTO, TSUTOMU & MARGARITA

AutoCAD SHX Text

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

07/19/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

C

A

LL

8

1

1

B

EFO

R

E

Y

O

U

D

I

G

RE

VIE

W S

ET

- 0

7.1

9.2

02

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEETS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET:

AutoCAD SHX Text

OF:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Y:\Client Files\0110\0110-123\CAD\Engineering\Improvement Plans\0110-123-C1.dwg 7/16/2021 9:58:39 AM James Turner 7/16/2021 9:58:39 AM James Turner7/16/2021 9:58:39 AM James Turner James TurnerJames Turner

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

WWW.ROANDERSON.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

JT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SG

AutoCAD SHX Text

NA

AutoCAD SHX Text

07.19.2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

0110-123

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE PLOT STAMP

AutoCAD SHX Text

C2

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

CIVIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAGASEKHAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

R. GORLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

V

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

Exp: 6/30/23

AutoCAD SHX Text

99

AutoCAD SHX Text

100

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROPOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

100

AutoCAD SHX Text

99

AutoCAD SHX Text

CENTERLINE MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR EASEMENT EP AND/OR LIP OF GUTTER FLOW LINE GAS LINE POWER TELEPHONE COMMON UTILITY TRENCH. SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN WATER LINE FENCE SILT FENCE RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

SD

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX. SD

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX. SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

POWER NV ENERGY ADDRESS: 875 E. LONG STREET, CARSON CITY, NV 89706 875 E. LONG STREET, CARSON CITY, NV 89706 PHONE: (775) 834-2930 (775) 834-2930 FAX: (775) 834-2939 (775) 834-2939 TELEPHONE FRONTIER ADDRESS: 1520 CHURCH STREET, GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410 1520 CHURCH STREET, GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410 PHONE: (775) 782-0969 (775) 782-0969 FAX: (775) 782-6846 (775) 782-6846 WATER GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY ADDRESS: 1579 VIRGINIA RANCH RD, GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410 1579 VIRGINIA RANCH RD, GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410 PHONE: (775) 782-2339 SEWER MINDEN-GARDNERVILLE SANITATION DISTRICT ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 568, MINDEN, NV 89423 P.O. BOX 568, MINDEN, NV 89423 PHONE: (775) 782-3546 (775) 782-3546 FAX: (775) 782-4915 (775) 782-4915 GAS SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1190, CARSON CITY, NV 89701 P.O. BOX 1190, CARSON CITY, NV 89701 PHONE: (775) 887-2723 (775) 887-2723 FAX: (775) 884-3012 (775) 884-3012 TV CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ADDRESS: 1338 CENTERVILLE LANE, GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410 1338 CENTERVILLE LANE, GARDNERVILLE, NV 89410 PHONE: (775) 783-8004 (775) 783-8004 FAX: (775) 783-8234 (775) 783-8234

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING PAVEMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING CONCRETE

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROPOSED PAVEMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROPOSED CONCRETE

AutoCAD SHX Text

OC.............. OD.............. OSHA.......... O/H............

AutoCAD SHX Text

N................ NAC............ NDEP......... NDOT......... NE............... NFIP............ NO(#)......... NOAA.......... NPI............. NRCS......... NRS............ NTS............ NW..............

AutoCAD SHX Text

BC............... BCR............. BFE............ BLD............ BW............... BVC.............

AutoCAD SHX Text

AASHTO....... AB............... AC.............. ADA............ ADT............. ALT............. ANSI............. APN............. APPROX....... APWA.......... ARV............. ASCE.......... ASTM......... @................ AWS........... AWWA..........

AutoCAD SHX Text

BEGIN CURVE BEGINNING OF CURB RETURN BASE FLOOD ELEVATION BUILDING BACK OF WALK BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AGGREGATE BASE ASPHALT CONCRETE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ALTITUDE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER APPROXIMATELY AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION AIR RELEASE VALVE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TESTING AND MATERIALS AT AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

R................ RCBC.......... RGRCP........ ROW...........

AutoCAD SHX Text

S=.............. S................ SAD............ SD.............. SDMH.......... SDR............ SE.............. S.F............. SERV.......... SIP............. SS.............. SSMH.......... ST.............. STA............ STD............ SW.............. SWPPP........

AutoCAD SHX Text

C&G............ CB............... CF............... CL............... CMP............ CO............... COMP......... CY..............

AutoCAD SHX Text

E................. EA............... EC............... ECR............. ELEC......... ELEV........ EP............... EPA............ EVC........... EW.............. EX...............

AutoCAD SHX Text

°................. DCCD......... DF............... DG............... DI................ DIA( )........

AutoCAD SHX Text

EAST EACH END CURVE END OF CURB RETURN ELECTRICAL ELEVATION EDGE OF PAVEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY END VERTICAL CURVE EDGE OF WATER EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEGREES DOUGLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEEPEND FOOTING DECOMPOSED GRANITE DROP INLET DIAMETER

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB AND GUTTER CATCH BASIN CUBIC FOOT CENTER LINE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CLEAN OUT COMPACTION CUBIC YARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

±................ P................ PC.............. PDL............ PED............ %................ PIP............. PL.............. PNT............ PSI............. PT............. PUE............ PVC...........

AutoCAD SHX Text

VC.............. VG.............. VERT.......... VPC............ VPT............

AutoCAD SHX Text

U................ UG.............. USACE........ USBR......... USGS.........

AutoCAD SHX Text

YEAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

YR.............

AutoCAD SHX Text

WAT........... W............... W/.............. WV.............

AutoCAD SHX Text

GB............... GID............. GPM............ GR............... GS...............

AutoCAD SHX Text

H/C.............. HDPE........... HORIZ..........

AutoCAD SHX Text

L................. L.F.............. LAT............. LS...............

AutoCAD SHX Text

M................. MAX............ MGD............ MGSD......... MH............... MI................ MIN.............. MISC............ MPH............. MUTCD.........

AutoCAD SHX Text

ID................ IE................ IN(")........... INC.............. IBC.............. INT.............. IRRIG...........

AutoCAD SHX Text

METER MAXIMUM MILLION GALLONS PER DAY MINDEN GARDNERVILLE SANITATION DISTRICT MANHOLE MILE MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MILES PER HOUR MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEFT LINEAR FOOT LATERAL LUMP SUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

INNER DIAMETER INVERT ELEVATION INCH INCORPORATED INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE INTERSECTION IRRIGATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

HANDICAP HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HORIZONTAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRADE BREAK GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT GALLONS PER MINUTE GRAVEL GROUND SHOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

TBC............ TC.............. TEL............ TOE............ TOM............ TOP............ TV.............. TW.............. TYP............

AutoCAD SHX Text

FDC............. FEMA........... FF............... FG............... FH............... FL............... FNC............ FND............ FT(').........

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED GRADE FIRE HYDRANT FLOWLINE FENCE FOUND MONUMENT, CORNER OR CONTROL POINT FEET

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER WEST WITH WATER GATE VALVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

VERTICAL CURVE VALLEY GUTTER VERTICAL VERTICAL POINT OF CURVATURE VERTICAL POINT OF TANGENCY

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITY UNDERGROUND UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOP BACK OF CURB TOP OF CURB TELEPHONE TOE OF SLOPE TOWN OF MINDEN TOP OF SLOPE TELEVISION TOP OF WALL TYPICAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

SLOPE SOUTH SURFACE AREA DISTURBANCE STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN MANHOLE STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO SOUTHEAST SQUARE FOOT(FEET) SERVICE SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMIT SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STREET STATION STANDARD SOUTHWEST STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN

AutoCAD SHX Text

RADIUS REINFORCED CONCRETE BOXED CULVERT RUBBER GASKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RIGHT OF WAY

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLUS OR MINUS POWER POINT OF CURVATURE POLY ETHYLENE PARKING PERCENT PROTECT IN PLACE PROPERTY LINE POINT POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH POINT OF TANGENCY PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ON CENTER OUTER DIAMETER OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OVERHEAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

NORTH NEVADA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE NEVADA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NORTHEAST NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM NUMBER NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NON PAY ITEM NATIONAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE NEVADA REVISED STATUTES NOT TO SCALE NORTHWEST

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITIES 1. NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY AND UTILITY USERS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF MAKING ANY NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY AND UTILITY USERS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF MAKING ANY NEW CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES OR DISRUPTION IN SERVICE. 2. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. DISCREPANCIES AND/OR POSSIBLE CONFLICTS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AND THE ENGINEER NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AND THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT "CALL BEFORE YOU DIG" THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT "CALL BEFORE YOU DIG" (1-800-227-2600) FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL APPURTENANT UTILITY PURVEYOR'S TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL APPURTENANT UTILITY PURVEYOR'S TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO ANY REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND/OR TESTING. 6. THE APPROVED PLAN, PERMIT AND INSPECTION RECORDS (IF ANY) MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE THE APPROVED PLAN, PERMIT AND INSPECTION RECORDS (IF ANY) MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 7. ENSURE ALL RIMS, COVERS, FRAMES ETC. OF ALL UTILITIES IN VEHICLE AREAS ARE TRAFFIC ENSURE ALL RIMS, COVERS, FRAMES ETC. OF ALL UTILITIES IN VEHICLE AREAS ARE TRAFFIC RATED AND ARE ADJUSTED TO FINAL FINISHED GRADE. 8. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 6-INCH OF VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN IRRIGATION SERVICE & MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 6-INCH OF VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN IRRIGATION SERVICE & POTABLE WATER. a. ALL IRRIGATION SERVICE LINES SHALL BE WHITE. ALL IRRIGATION SERVICE LINES SHALL BE WHITE. b. ALL POTABEL WATER LINES SHALL BE BLUE.ALL POTABEL WATER LINES SHALL BE BLUE.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CENTERLINE MONUMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

GAS METER

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRE HYDRANT

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROPOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIGN

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION NUMBER

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (SINGLE)

AutoCAD SHX Text

SURVEY CONTROL POINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

STREET LIGHT

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITY GUY ANCHOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (CONCENTRIC)

AutoCAD SHX Text

SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITY VAULT

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORM DRAIN FLARED END SECTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORM DRAIN DROP INLET

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITY POLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER METER

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

VALVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITY PULL-BOX

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC)

AutoCAD SHX Text

REDUCER

AutoCAD SHX Text

BASIS OF BEARING N45°33'06"E -- THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF PARCEL APN: 1320-33-401-033 AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY FOR CMS INTERNATIONAL RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 2001 IN BK. 1101, PG. 3907, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 527646 IN THE DOUGLAS COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEVADA. DATUM VERTICAL DATUM FOR THIS PROJECT IS NAVD 88 BASED UPON NGS BENCHMARK J119 ELEVATION = 4749.3' PROJECT CONTROL POINTS AS SHOWN ON C4

AutoCAD SHX Text

BOLLARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

GENERAL 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION ("ORANGE BOOK"). ALL WORK AND MATERIALS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE AMENDED SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS ARE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK, CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION ASSOCIATED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK, CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PERMIT, THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE SHALL NOTIFY THE DOUGLAS COUNTY INSPECTOR AT (775) 782-6211 OF INTENT TO BEGIN AND REQUEST/SCHEDULE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING AT THE PROJECT SITE WITH THE DOUGLAS COUNTY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. FAILURE TO PROVIDE PROPER INSPECTION NOTIFICATION AS PRESCRIBED ABOVE SHALL RESULT IN THIS PERMIT BECOMING INVALID AND WORK BEING STOPPED. 3. CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN NECESSARY SITE CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN NECESSARY SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMITS AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMIT CONDITIONS AS FOUND ON THE BACK OF THE PERMIT FORM. THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE WILL SECURE AND PAY ALL ASSOCIATED FEES FOR THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMIT, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RETRIEVE THE PERMIT AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE TOWN. 4. THE APPROVED PLAN, PERMIT AND INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL THE APPROVED PLAN, PERMIT AND INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 5. DOUGLAS COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS NOT DOUGLAS COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS NOT REPRESENTED BY USA DIGS. WHEN THE CONTRACTOR EXCAVATES NEAR OR ADJACENT TO ANY OF THESE FACILITIES/PROPERTIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AT THE PHONE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE TO REQUEST ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING ALL THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. THIS REQUIREMENT MAY ALSO APPLY TO ANY OTHER COUNTY FACILITY/PROPERTY. 6. IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT FROM THE IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT FROM THE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AS REQUIRED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ITS REQUIREMENT FOR DUST CONTROL ON ALL APPLICABLE PROJECTS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE. 7. THE ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFIES AS EVIDENCED BY A PROFESSIONAL SEAL & SIGNATURE, THE ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFIES AS EVIDENCED BY A PROFESSIONAL SEAL & SIGNATURE, THAT ALL AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HAVE BEEN CONTACTED. ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED UTILITY LINES AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED ONTO THESE PLANS, TO THE BEST OF ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE AND BASED ON INFORMATION FROM THE UTILITY COMPANY. THE ENGINEER ALSO HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT ALL EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN CORRECTLY PLOTTED AND SHOWN. 8. THE ENGINEER, OR LAND SURVEYOR OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY UPON COMPLETION OF THE ENGINEER, OR LAND SURVEYOR OF RECORD SHALL CERTIFY UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION THAT ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, CONCRETE PAVING, STREET LIGHTS, ETC.) HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AT THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. ANY CHANGES SHALL BE REFLECTED ON "AS-BUILTS"/ RECORD DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER TO THE COUNTY'S ENGINEERING DIVISION, IN PDF AND CAD FORMAT AND ALSO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF DIVISION 2.2.13.9 RECORD DRAWINGS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING FOR THE PROJECT. 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING THE RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF ALL THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING THE RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF ALL UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE RELOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES, POWER POLES, IRRIGATION DRY-UPS, RESETS AND REMOVALS BY OTHERS, ETC. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND AVOID DAMAGE TO THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND AVOID DAMAGE TO SAME. CALL 811 FOR USA DIGS TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. 12. IF A FIRE HYDRANT IS NEEDED TO OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION WATER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IF A FIRE HYDRANT IS NEEDED TO OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION WATER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A FIRE HYDRANT METER FROM DOUGLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS OR APPLICABLE WATER PURVEYOR AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FEES AND CHARGES WITH NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION PROVIDED BY THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE. 13. IF DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC FACILITY, THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO OR IS UNABLE IF DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC FACILITY, THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO OR IS UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH A REQUEST FROM THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR, AND IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE TOWN FORCES TO DO WORK THAT IS NORMALLY THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY, THE TOWN SHALL BE JUSTIFIED IN BILLING THE CONTRACTOR. EACH INCIDENT REQUIRING WORK BY THE TOWN FORCES SHALL BE COVERED BY A SEPARATE BILLING AT THE CURRENT APPLICABLE RATES. 14. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT DAMAGES TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR SYSTEMS AS RESULT THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT DAMAGES TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR SYSTEMS AS RESULT OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY, ALL REPAIRS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 24 HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT ANY COSTS RELATED TO REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED PUBLIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS METHODS, MEANS, TECHNIQUES, THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS METHODS, MEANS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND SCHEDULE THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. 16. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL AND BARRICADING WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL AND BARRICADING WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. NO STREET CLOSURES WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN BY THE DOUGLAS COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GENERAL SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GENERAL SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO PERTINENT SAFETY REGULATIONS AND CODES. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING, IDENTIFYING AND PROTECTING ALL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING, IDENTIFYING AND PROTECTING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, ADJACENT STREETS, AND IMPROVEMENTS DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATION AND SHORING PROCEDURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATION AND SHORING PROCEDURES. 20. PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF AND COMPLY WITH PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF AND COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT TITLED "PHASE 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BY KRAZAN & ASSOCIATED DATED 04/19/2013". IN THE EVENT A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS AND NOTES HEREIN, THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS SHALL PREVAIL. 21. PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF AND COMPLY WITH PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF AND COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP), THE STORM WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT AND THE SURFACE AREA DISTURBANCE PERMIT (SAD), AS APPLICABLE, ISSUED BY THE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (NDEP). 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF ANY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE IN THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. 23. SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL AND 1 VERTICAL, OR AS DETERMINED BY SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL AND 1 VERTICAL, OR AS DETERMINED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY. 24. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL PROVIDE THE COUNTY, AND TOG, WITH COPIES OF ALL TEST THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL PROVIDE THE COUNTY, AND TOG, WITH COPIES OF ALL TEST RESULTS ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND A BOUND REPORT OF THE TEST RESULTS AND INSPECTION REPORTS, ARRANGED IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER, AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 25. FILL AREAS SHALL BE CLEARED OF VEGETATION AND DEBRIS PRIOR TO PLACING ANY FILL. FILL AREAS SHALL BE CLEARED OF VEGETATION AND DEBRIS PRIOR TO PLACING ANY FILL. 26. PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SHALL BE USED TO PREVENT PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SHALL BE USED TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE PONDING, EROSION AND TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS. 27. ALL STREETS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF DUST AND MUD CAUSED BY GRADING ALL STREETS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF DUST AND MUD CAUSED BY GRADING OPERATIONS. 28. THE CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE THE CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN INSPECTION BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE, INCLUDING PRECAST STRUCTURES. 29. NO ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN 4" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED IN FILL NO ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN 4" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE PLACED IN FILL UNLESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUCH PLACEMENT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED IN ADVANCE AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY.

AutoCAD SHX Text

33. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE ALL GRADING INCLUDING COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS AND THE THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE ALL GRADING INCLUDING COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS AND THE STABILITY OF SLOPES CREATED, EXISTING OR REMAINING. 34. ALL UNSPECIFIED CONCRETE SHALL BE 4000 PSI WITH 6% AIR ENTRAINMENT +/- 1.5%. ALL UNSPECIFIED CONCRETE SHALL BE 4000 PSI WITH 6% AIR ENTRAINMENT +/- 1.5%. 35. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CLEAN PROJECT SITE, REMOVING CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CLEAN PROJECT SITE, REMOVING CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH ACTIVITY DAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DEBRIS FREE CONSTRUCTION ROUTES, ADJACENT STREETS AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS.

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORM DRAIN 1. MANHOLE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 204 MANHOLE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 204 "MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS" OF THE STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 2. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (P.C.C) SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS: 4000 PSI MINIMUM PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (P.C.C) SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS: 4000 PSI MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @ 28 DAYS, (CURB AND GUTTER TRANSITION ONLY, ALL UNEXPOSED CONCRETE MAY BE 3000 PSI), MIN. 6 SACK OF CEMENT PER CUBIC YARD WITH A MAX. WATER/CEMENT RATIO OF 0.45, AIR ENTRAINMENT 6% +/- 1.5%, SLUMP AT 1 TO INCHES. ALL MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION SECTION 202. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 40 AND 1.5 INCHES MINIMUM CLEAR COVER. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 40 AND 1.5 INCHES MINIMUM CLEAR COVER. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS PRIOR TO ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 5. FRAMES AND GRATES SHALL BE MATCHED TO ACHIEVE A CLOSE TOLERANCE FIT, WITH MINIMAL GAPS, FRAMES AND GRATES SHALL BE MATCHED TO ACHIEVE A CLOSE TOLERANCE FIT, WITH MINIMAL GAPS, AS APPROVED BY THE STORM DRAIN UTILITIES. 6. PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS, OTHER THAN GRADE RINGS, SHALL BE JOINED WITH FLEXIBLE PLASTIC PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS, OTHER THAN GRADE RINGS, SHALL BE JOINED WITH FLEXIBLE PLASTIC GASKET MATERIAL SUCH AS RAM-NEK OR APPROVED EQUAL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE RUBBER-GASKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RGRCP) WITH ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE RUBBER-GASKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RGRCP) WITH WATER-TIGHT GASKET PER ASTM D3212. 8. THE CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES THE CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHALL SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN INSPECTION BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE.

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER MONITORING WELL

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

SYMBOLS

AutoCAD SHX Text

ABBREVIATIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

HATCHING

AutoCAD SHX Text

SURVEY CONTROL

AutoCAD SHX Text

LINE TYPES

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTE: NOT ALL SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS, NOTES, LINETYPES & HATCHING LISTED MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

UTILITY COMPANY CONTACTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

07/19/21

C

A

LL

8

1

1

B

EFO

R

E

Y

O

U

D

I

G

RE

VIE

W S

ET

- 0

7.1

9.2

02

1

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

·

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO LEFT

AutoCAD SHX Text

30"

AutoCAD SHX Text

14"

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

U

AutoCAD SHX Text

US HWY 395

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO TURN

AutoCAD SHX Text

DO NOT ENTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

STOP

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO LEFT TURN

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIGN

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIGN

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX SSMH 4756.43 RIM 4750.13 I.E. 8" IN 4750.13 I.E. 10" IN 4750.08 I.E. 10" OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REPLACE EX SDCB 4756.06 RIM 4752.01 I.E. IN 4751.91 I.E. OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE EX SDMH 4758.61 RIM 4755.01 I.E. 18" IN 4752.31 I.E. 18" IN 4752.26 I.E. 18" OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REPLACE EX SDCB 4756.16 RIM 4752.21 I.E. IN 4752.11 I.E. OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX SSMH 4758.87 RIM 4752.37 I.E. 8" IN 4752.27 I.E. 8" OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROTECT IN PLACE ALL UTILITIES

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REINSTALL POWER POLE & LIGHT POLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REINSTALL LIGHT POLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE 216 L.F. 3'x6' BOX CULVERT

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE 28 L.F. 18" SD

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSTALL FIBER ROLL

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE 35 L.F. CURB & GUTTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

10" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

8" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

10" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

10" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

8" WAT

AutoCAD SHX Text

8" WAT

AutoCAD SHX Text

2" GAS

AutoCAD SHX Text

2" GAS

AutoCAD SHX Text

2" TELE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1" = 20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEETS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET:

AutoCAD SHX Text

OF:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Y:\Client Files\0110\0110-123\CAD\Engineering\Improvement Plans\0110-123-C3.dwg 7/19/2021 2:32:39 PM James Turner 7/19/2021 2:32:39 PM James Turner7/19/2021 2:32:39 PM James Turner James TurnerJames Turner

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

WWW.ROANDERSON.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

JT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SG

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"=20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

07.19.2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

0110-123

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE PLOT STAMP

AutoCAD SHX Text

C3

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1" = 20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING CONDITIONS, DEMOLITION & EROSION CONTROL PLAN

AutoCAD SHX Text

10'

AutoCAD SHX Text

10'

AutoCAD SHX Text

36"

AutoCAD SHX Text

36"

AutoCAD SHX Text

36"

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTES: 1. SPACE POSTS NO MORE THAN 10' APART AND DRIVE THEM AT LEAST 12" INTO THE GROUND. ALIGN THE FENCE ALONG SPACE POSTS NO MORE THAN 10' APART AND DRIVE THEM AT LEAST 12" INTO THE GROUND. ALIGN THE FENCE ALONG THE SLOPE CONTOUR, CURVING IT SLIGHTLY UPHILL TO AVOID END RUNS. 2. DIG A 4"X8" TRENCH ALONG THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE POSTS. DIG A 4"X8" TRENCH ALONG THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE POSTS. 3. FASTEN WIRE MESH TO UPHILL SIDE OF POST WITH STAPLES (ON WOOD POSTS) OR WIRE (ON STEEL POSTS). EXTEND FASTEN WIRE MESH TO UPHILL SIDE OF POST WITH STAPLES (ON WOOD POSTS) OR WIRE (ON STEEL POSTS). EXTEND MESH TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH. (DO NOT ATTACH MESH OR FABRIC TO TREES.) 4. FASTEN FILTER FABRIC TO UPHILL SIDE OF POSTS WITH STAPLES OR WIRE. EXTEND FABRIC 8" INTO TRENCH. FASTEN FILTER FABRIC TO UPHILL SIDE OF POSTS WITH STAPLES OR WIRE. EXTEND FABRIC 8" INTO TRENCH. 5. BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT THE SOIL. BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT THE SOIL. 6. SOME TYPES OF FILTER FABRIC FENCE HAVE STAKES INCLUDED AND DO NOT REQUIRE THE MATERIALS LISTED: SOME TYPES OF FILTER FABRIC FENCE HAVE STAKES INCLUDED AND DO NOT REQUIRE THE MATERIALS LISTED: i FILTER FABRIC 36" WIDE; TENSILE STRENGTH 120 LBS.; EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE 70 FILTER FABRIC 36" WIDE; TENSILE STRENGTH 120 LBS.; EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE 70 ii POSTS 5' LONG (MIN.); 4"X4" WOOD OR 1.3 LBS/FT. STEEL; EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE 70 POSTS 5' LONG (MIN.); 4"X4" WOOD OR 1.3 LBS/FT. STEEL; EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE 70 iii WIRE MESH 36" WIDE; 6" MESH MAX.; 14 GAUGE WIRE (MIN.) WIRE MESH 36" WIDE; 6" MESH MAX.; 14 GAUGE WIRE (MIN.) iv STAPLES HEAVY DUTY (FOR WOOD POSTS); 1" LONG (MIN.); 14 GAUGE WIRE (MIN.) STAPLES HEAVY DUTY (FOR WOOD POSTS); 1" LONG (MIN.); 14 GAUGE WIRE (MIN.) v WIRE (FOR STEEL POSTS) WIRE (FOR STEEL POSTS) 7. THE FABRIC SHOULD NOT EXCEED MORE THAN 36" ABOVE THE GROUND. CUT FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL THE FABRIC SHOULD NOT EXCEED MORE THAN 36" ABOVE THE GROUND. CUT FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL TO AVOID HAVING JOINTS. WHERE JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SPLICE THE FABRIC ONLY AT A POST, WITH AT LEAST 6" OF OVERLAP, AND FASTEN BOTH ENDS SECURELY TO THE POST.

AutoCAD SHX Text

WOOD OR STEEL POST

AutoCAD SHX Text

FILTER FABRIC

AutoCAD SHX Text

8"

AutoCAD SHX Text

8"

AutoCAD SHX Text

8"

AutoCAD SHX Text

12"

AutoCAD SHX Text

12"

AutoCAD SHX Text

12"

AutoCAD SHX Text

WOOD POST OR STEEL POST

AutoCAD SHX Text

WIRE MESH

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

36"

AutoCAD SHX Text

36"

AutoCAD SHX Text

36"

AutoCAD SHX Text

SLOPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

FILTER FABRIC EXTENDS 8" INTO TRENCH.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELEVATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

WIRE MESH EXTENDS TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FILTER FABRIC FENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO SCALE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX GROUND

AutoCAD SHX Text

IN CASE OF EMERGENCY CALL R.O. ANDERSON ENGINEERING, INC. AT 775-782-2322. PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF AND COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) AND THE CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED BY NDEP. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CLEAN PROJECT SITE, REMOVING CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH ACTIVITY DAY. TRASH SHALL BE DISPOSED IN AN ON-SITE DUMPSTER OR DEBRIS BOX OR HAULED TO THE DOUGLAS COUNTY TRANSFER STATION OR OTHER LICENSED DISPOSAL FACILITY. NO CONSTRUCTION WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE BURIED ON SITE. AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER, ALL BMP'S AND GRADED SLOPE SURFACE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED TO VERIFY CONTINUED SATISFACTORY OPERATION AND REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF NECESSARY. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER THROUGHOUT ENTIRE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. IF A REPAIR IS NECESSARY IT SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REPORT. BUILT-UP SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE BMP'S. A MAINTENANCE INSPECTION REPORT WILL BE MADE AFTER EACH INSPECTION. THE REPORT WILL CONTAIN THE NAME OF THE INSPECTOR, MEASURES, AREAS INSPECTED, OBSERVED CONDITIONS, AND NOTE CHANGES NECESSARY TO THE SWPPP. REPORTS SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE SWPPP ON SITE. REPORT RELEASES OF REPORTABLE QUANTITIES OF OIL OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (IF THEY OCCUR) TO NDEP AND THE OWNER WITHIN 24 HOURS. LOCATION OF FIBER ROLL AND OTHER BMPS MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED WITH APPROVAL OF ENGINEER. PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, PAVEMENT, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE IN PLACE, EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED FOR DEMOLITION HEREON. PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SHALL BE USED TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND ALL IRRIGATION FACILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EROSION CONTROL NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIBER ROLL FOR GUTTER SEDIMENT CONTROL PER DETAIL ON THIS SHEET.

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING PAVEMENT / DEMO

AutoCAD SHX Text

FILTER FABRIC FENCE PER DETAIL ON THIS SHEET.

AutoCAD SHX Text

STREET SWEEPING

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO SCALE

AutoCAD SHX Text

%%UPLAN VIEW

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIBER ROLL DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING AC

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

SURFACE FLOW

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.S. HWY 395

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TOLER AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REPLACE 142 L.F. EXISTING FENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING FENCE PROTECT IN PLACE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

1220-04-101-013 1380 GARDNERVILLE LLC

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIBER ROLL SEDIMENT LOG

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

SAWCUT AND REMOVE 1,734 S.F. AC

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAWCUT AND REMOVE 3,022 S.F. AC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CIVIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAGASEKHAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

R. GORLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

V

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

Exp: 6/30/23

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO SCALE

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB INLET PROTECTION DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOW

AutoCAD SHX Text

NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC SET UNDER DRAIN INLET

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRAVEL BAG WEIGHTS AT ENDS AND 3' O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB & GUTTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB & GUTTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB INLET PROTEXTION FOR GUTTER SEDIMENT CONTROL PER DETAIL ON THIS SHEET.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEMOLITION NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REPLACE 142 L.F. EXISTING FENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text

07/19/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEPICTED UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. USE CAUTION. PROTECT ALL UTILITIES IN PLACE.

AutoCAD SHX Text

GATE

C

A

LL

8

1

1

B

EFO

R

E

Y

O

U

D

I

G

RE

VIE

W S

ET

- 0

7.1

9.2

02

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

U

AutoCAD SHX Text

2-10'x3' BOX CULVERT

AutoCAD SHX Text

2-10'x3' BOX CULVERT

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

IRR

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

4754

AutoCAD SHX Text

4753

AutoCAD SHX Text

0.40% >

AutoCAD SHX Text

10" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

8" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

8" WAT

AutoCAD SHX Text

10" SS

AutoCAD SHX Text

2" GAS

AutoCAD SHX Text

2" TELE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING GROUND AT CENTERLINE

AutoCAD SHX Text

4-3'x5' BOX CULVERTS @ S=0.25%

AutoCAD SHX Text

0.40%%%

AutoCAD SHX Text

4-3'x5' BOX CULVERT TA 1+43.37, 0.00' TOP OF HEADWALL 4755.84 4752.34 I.E. IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

4-3'x5' BOX CULVERT 3+69.47, 0.00' TOP OF HEADWALL 4755.28 4751.78 I.E. OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE EX SDMH STA 2+62.11, 6.94'L 4758.61 RIM 4755.01 I.E. 18" IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

CB#1 STA 3+10.00, 5.17'R 4756.16 GRATE 4754.92 I.E. IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

CB#2 STA 3+61.72, 0.40'R 4756.06 GRATE 4754.92 I.E. IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

FINISHED GROUND AT CENTERLINE OF NEW CHANNEL

AutoCAD SHX Text

SD RCB CONNECTION STA 2+43.28, 11.00'R 4753.09 I.E. IN @ BOX CULVERT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SANITARY SEWER CROSSING STA 2+52.65, 0.00' 4753.49 I.E. 8" IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER CROSSING STA 3+51.52, 0.00'

AutoCAD SHX Text

GAS CROSSING STA 3+15.25, 0.00'

AutoCAD SHX Text

TELE CROSSING STA 3+57.13, 0.00'

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER CROSSING STA 1+63.68, 0.00' DEPTH UNKNOWN

AutoCAD SHX Text

T/G/P/E CROSSING STA 1+59.12, 0.00'

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEWER CROSSING STA 2+52.65, 0.00' 4750.31 I.E. 8" IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING SD CULVERT TO BE REMOVED

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING SD CULVERT TO BE REMOVED

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1" = 20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEETS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET:

AutoCAD SHX Text

OF:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Y:\Client Files\0110\0110-123\CAD\Engineering\Improvement Plans\0110-123-C4.dwg 7/19/2021 2:22:31 PM James Turner 7/19/2021 2:22:31 PM James Turner7/19/2021 2:22:31 PM James Turner James TurnerJames Turner

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

WWW.ROANDERSON.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

JT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SG

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"=20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

07.19.2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

0110-123

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE PLOT STAMP

AutoCAD SHX Text

C4

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

1" = 20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

40'

AutoCAD SHX Text

BOX CULVERT PLAN AND PROFILE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX SSMH 4756.43 RIM 4750.13 I.E. 8" IN 4750.13 I.E. 8" IN 4750.08 I.E. 10" OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

CB#2 4756.06 RIM 4752.01 I.E. IN 4751.91 I.E. OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

CB#1 4756.16 RIM 4752.21 I.E. IN 4752.11 I.E. OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.S. HWY 395

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX SSMH 4758.87 RIM 4752.37 I.E. 8" IN 4752.27 I.E. 8" OUT

AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REINSTALL POWER POLE & LIGHT POLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOLER AVENUE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

REMOVE & REINSTALL LIGHT POLE

AutoCAD SHX Text

CIVIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAGASEKHAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

R. GORLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

V

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

Exp: 6/30/23

AutoCAD SHX Text

VERTICAL SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

HORIZONTAL SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"=20'

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"=2'

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSTALL 60 L.F. CURB & GUTTER TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A05-A ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 317 S.F. SIDEWALK TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A06 ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 63 L.F. CURB & GUTTER TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A05-A ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 313 S.F. SIDEWALK TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A06 ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 57 L.F. CURB & GUTTER TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A05-A ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 206 S.F. SIDEWALK TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A06 ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 57 L.F. CURB & GUTTER TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A05-A ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL 206 S.F. SIDEWALK TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL A06 ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. SAWCUT, REMOVE & REPLACE 3,022 S.F. OF AC. PER DETAIL A14 ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. SAWCUT, REMOVE & REPLACE 1,734 S.F. OF AC. PER DETAIL A14 ON C5 MATCH EXISTING GRADES. INSTALL TYPE 4R CURB INLET PER DETAIL D06 ON C5. INSTALL 2-10'x3' BOX CULVERTS PROVIDED BY JENSEN PRECAST PER DETAIL ON C6. INSTALL HEADWALL PER DETAILS ON C6. INSTALL ±450 S.F. CLASS 300 RIP-RAP.

AutoCAD SHX Text

07/19/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

SD RCB CONNECTION STA 2+43.28, 11.00'R 4753.09 I.E. 18" IN

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSTALL ±100 L.F. OF FENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text

GATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

MARTIN SLOUGH

AutoCAD SHX Text

GENERAL NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

RCB CULVERT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE BEDDED ON 4" OF CLASS C BEDDING MATERIAL (NDOT DETAIL R-1.1.6) AND BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NDOT DETAIL R-1.1.4. RCB CULVERT EXTENSIONS AND WING WALLS SHALL BE FOUNDED ON TOP OF CONSTRUCTION PLATFORMS CONSISTING OF CLASS 150 RIP-RAP BEDDING WRAPPED IN NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE CLASS I FABRIC. GEOTEXTILE INSTALLATION PROCEDURES AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR BOTH APPLICATIONS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTIONS 203 AND 731 OF THE NDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. THE THICKNESS OF THE WRAPPED RIP-RAP BEDDING IS 36" UNDER THE RCB CULVERT EXTENSIONS AND 18" UNDER THE WING-WALLS. PLACE RIP-RAP BEDDING IN LIFTS AND PROPERLY COMPACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208 OF THE NDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. THE INITIAL LIFT OF THE RIP-RAP BEDDING SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 12" AND THE REMAINING LIFTS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 8".

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEPICTED UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. USE CAUTION. PROTECT ALL UTILITIES IN PLACE.

C

A

LL

8

1

1

B

EFO

R

E

Y

O

U

D

I

G

RE

VIE

W S

ET

- 0

7.1

9.2

02

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEETS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET:

AutoCAD SHX Text

OF:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Y:\Client Files\0110\0110-123\CAD\Engineering\Improvement Plans\0110-123-DETAILS.dwg 7/16/2021 9:59:22 AM James Turner 7/16/2021 9:59:22 AM James Turner7/16/2021 9:59:22 AM James Turner James TurnerJames Turner

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

WWW.ROANDERSON.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

JT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SG

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

07.19.2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

0110-123

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE PLOT STAMP

AutoCAD SHX Text

C5

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

DETAILS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CIVIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAGASEKHAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

R. GORLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

V

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

Exp: 6/30/23

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAGE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

12/98

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPICAL TRENCH

AutoCAD SHX Text

GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY - STANDARD DETAILS

AutoCAD SHX Text

G-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

(12" MIN. DEPTH)

AutoCAD SHX Text

ASPHALT REPAIR

AutoCAD SHX Text

0-10%

AutoCAD SHX Text

30-75%

AutoCAD SHX Text

90-100%

AutoCAD SHX Text

100%

AutoCAD SHX Text

PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAWCUT & TACK (TYP.)

AutoCAD SHX Text

4' MIN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING EDGE.

AutoCAD SHX Text

12" TYP.

AutoCAD SHX Text

3" MIN DEPTH WITH SEAL COAT

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.C. PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING)

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAVEMENT WIDTH SHALL BE REPLACED TO THE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAWCUT AND EDGE IS LESS THAN 24", THE ENTIRE

AutoCAD SHX Text

IF PAVEMENT WIDTH REMAINING BETWEEN THE

AutoCAD SHX Text

12" MIN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

(90% MIN. COMPACTION)

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAND OR D.G. OR CLASS A BACKFILL

AutoCAD SHX Text

BELOW

AutoCAD SHX Text

12. GA. COPPER-CLAD STEEL WIRE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO. 200

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO. 16

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO. 4

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2"

AutoCAD SHX Text

0 - 5%

AutoCAD SHX Text

90 - 100%

AutoCAD SHX Text

12"

AutoCAD SHX Text

O.D.

AutoCAD SHX Text

12"

AutoCAD SHX Text

3/4"

AutoCAD SHX Text

3/8"

AutoCAD SHX Text

U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE

AutoCAD SHX Text

USED IN WET TRENCH ONLY:

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER LINE ONLY

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE FOLLOWING GRADED BEDDING MATERIAL SHALL BE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

4" DRY TRENCH

AutoCAD SHX Text

O.D./2

AutoCAD SHX Text

3" PLASTIC MARKING TAPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

LABELED "WATER"

AutoCAD SHX Text

20-40%

AutoCAD SHX Text

30-60%

AutoCAD SHX Text

50-80%

AutoCAD SHX Text

100%

AutoCAD SHX Text

3/8"

AutoCAD SHX Text

3/4"

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"

AutoCAD SHX Text

1-1/2"

AutoCAD SHX Text

USED IN WET TRENCH ONLY:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEWER LINE ONLY

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

6" WET TRENCH

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

MIN. 42" COVER

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

USED IN DRY TRENCH ONLY:

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPE II AGGREGATE BASE

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRADED BEDDING MATERIAL AS DESCRIBED

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPE A OR TYPE B BACKFILL (MGSD SPEC.)

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATER & SEWER LINE

AutoCAD SHX Text

0-10%

AutoCAD SHX Text

20-25%

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO. 200

AutoCAD SHX Text

N0. 4

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

MISC. REVISIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/12

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAGE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

12/98

AutoCAD SHX Text

GENERAL NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY - STANDARD DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

G-2

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

GENERAL NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text

GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY

AutoCAD SHX Text

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH ALL UTILITIES, GARDNERVILLE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH ALL UTILITIES, GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY, AND WITH THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT AND COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT AND COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITIES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL WATER LINES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SERVICES SHALL BE C900 AND HAVE A CLASS 150 RATING. ALL WATER LINES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SERVICES SHALL BE C900 AND HAVE A CLASS 150 RATING. VALVES SHALL HAVE RISER, VALVE BOX, AND BE AWWA APPROVED. WATER LINES AND VALVES SHALL INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A BLUE INSULATED NO. 10 SOLID COPPER TRACER WIRE. ALL WATER LINES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL SERVICES, WATER LINES TO FIRE HYDRANTS, OR FIRE SERVICE LINES SHALL BE A MINIMUM 8 INCH DIAMETER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE, THE WATER COMPANY, AND ALL AFFECTED CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE TOWN OF GARDNERVILLE, THE WATER COMPANY, AND ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF MAKING A CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER LINES. 5. WATER LINE DISINFECTION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH AWWA C651-86 SECTION 5.1, THE TABLET WATER LINE DISINFECTION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH AWWA C651-86 SECTION 5.1, THE TABLET METHOD. 6. ALL WATER LINES TO FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE TESTED TO 200 PSI IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ALL WATER LINES TO FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE TESTED TO 200 PSI IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY. 7. PAINT FIRE HYDRANT BASIC YELLOW CODE 14 FOR MUELLER HYDRANTS. ALL OTHER HYDRANTS SHALL USE PAINT FIRE HYDRANT BASIC YELLOW CODE 14 FOR MUELLER HYDRANTS. ALL OTHER HYDRANTS SHALL USE SHERWIN-WILLAMS YELLOW #F75KXY0042-2252, KEM400. PAINT FIRE HYDRANTS BONNET HEAVY DUTY ENAMEL SAFETY GREEN (612-63, 615-63) IF FLOW IS BETWEEN 1,000 GPM AND 1,499 GPM; PORT BLUE (D109) FOR 1,500 GPM AND ABOVE. 8. ALL BOLTS AT THRUST BLOCKS AND VALVE SADDLES SHALL BE COVERED WITH VISQUENE AND TAPED PRIOR ALL BOLTS AT THRUST BLOCKS AND VALVE SADDLES SHALL BE COVERED WITH VISQUENE AND TAPED PRIOR TO CONCRETE ENCASEMENT. 9. THE WATER COMPANY SHALL INSPECT ALL JOINTS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. ANY JOINT NOT INSPECTED THE WATER COMPANY SHALL INSPECT ALL JOINTS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. ANY JOINT NOT INSPECTED BEFORE BACKFILLING MAY RESULT IN THE ENTIRE LINE NOT BE ACCEPTED. 10. ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, BUREAU OF SAFE DRINKING WATER, AND GARDNERVILLE TOWN WATER COMPANY. ALL CROSS CONNECTION DEVICES SHALL BE TESTABLE. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED CONFIRMING COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 11. A SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER COMPANY FOR THEIR REVIEW AND A SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER COMPANY FOR THEIR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE MADE, A REPRODUCIBLE SET SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE WATER COMPANY FOR THEIR APPROVAL. THE ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT AN AUTOCAD FILE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION TO G.W.C. AS SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR OF THE WATERLINE LOCATIONS, SERVICES, DATE ETC. THAT IS INSTALLED AS A PART OF THIS CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY THE AS-BUILTS AND MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS AS NECESSARY FOR THE TRUE LOCATIONS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION OF WATER LINE AND SERVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE ALL CONSTRUCTION OF WATER LINE AND SERVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE GARDNERVILLE WATER COMPANY. 13. ALL COMMERCIAL AND SEPARATE IRRIGATION SERVICES SHALL INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A METER. THE ALL COMMERCIAL AND SEPARATE IRRIGATION SERVICES SHALL INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A METER. THE METER SHALL BE "SENSUS SR2 TRPL". 14. ALL TEES, BENDS, CROSSES, AND VALVES SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. ALL TEES, BENDS, CROSSES, AND VALVES SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. 15. ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR BACKFLOW PREVENTION ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR BACKFLOW PREVENTION PER NAC 278.410. 16. ALL THRUST BLOCKS FOR GATE VALVES, TEES AND ELBOWS SHALL INCLUDE 1/4" MINIMUM GALVANIZED ALL THRUST BLOCKS FOR GATE VALVES, TEES AND ELBOWS SHALL INCLUDE 1/4" MINIMUM GALVANIZED CHAIN STRAPS OR REINFORCING STEEL SECURED AROUND EACH VALVE, TEE, OR ELBOW AND IMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE. EMBEDMENT INTO CONCRETE SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES. 17. A 4-INCH THICK CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL EXTEND 12-INCHES FROM THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE A 4-INCH THICK CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL EXTEND 12-INCHES FROM THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE HYDRANT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

POINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

10/07

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

THRUST BLOCK CHAIN

AutoCAD SHX Text

10/07

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONC. COLLAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

09/12

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPE 1 PCC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB & GUTTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

STANDARD DETAIL FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DWG:

AutoCAD SHX Text

A05-A

AutoCAD SHX Text

JULY 2017

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTES: : 1. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 337 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO FREEZE-THAW ENVIRONMENTS. 2. WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 10 FEET. THE JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 312 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 3. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT LOCATIONS DESIGNATED IN SECTION 312 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 4. TYPE 2, CLASS B AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 200 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE MECHANICALLY COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 308 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION.

AutoCAD SHX Text

6" MINIMUM TYPE 2 CLASS B COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2"R

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2"R

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2"R

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAGE 1 OF 1

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPICAL SIDEWALK

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DWG:

AutoCAD SHX Text

A06

AutoCAD SHX Text

JULY 2017

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

PL/ROW

AutoCAD SHX Text

SLOPE: 2%

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTES: : 1. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 337 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO FREEZE-THAW ENVIRONMENTS. 2. WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 10 FEET. ON SIDEWALKS WIDER THAN 5 FEET, THE JOINTING PATTERN SHALL BE 0.8 TO 1.2 TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK, NOT TO EXCEED 8 FEET. THE JOINTS SHALL PENETRATE TO A DEPTH OF 2 INCHES AND BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 312 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION; SEE "PCC JOINTING" PCC JOINTING" " DETAIL A11. 3. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT LOCATIONS DESIGNATED IN SECTION 312 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 4. TYPE 2, CLASS B AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 200 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL BE MECHANICALLY COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 308 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONCRETE SIDEWALK SUBJECT TO COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAY TRAFFIC SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 6 INCHES. 6. NO OBSTRUCTION, SUCH AS UTILITY POLES, SIGNAL POLES AND CONTROLS, WATER METER BOXES, PULL BOXES, ETC. ARE ALLOWED WITHIN SIDEWALKS. 7. FOR SIDEWALKS WITHIN DOWNTOWN GARDNERVILLE, PROVIDE TREE GRATES AND CONCRETE SCORING AS REQUIRED BY THE TOWN IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TOWN'S TREE GRATE AND STAMP DETAIL. SEE SEPARATE TOWN OF MINDEN DETAILS WHERE APPLICABLE.

AutoCAD SHX Text

4" MIN. CONC. SEE NOTE 5

AutoCAD SHX Text

6" MIN. TYPE 2 CLASS B COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAGE 1 OF 1

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

STREET CUT REPAIR

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DWG:

AutoCAD SHX Text

A14

AutoCAD SHX Text

JULY 2017

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING AC

AutoCAD SHX Text

AC PAVEMENT (TYPE 3) AGGREGATE. MATCH EXISTING OR DESIGN THICKNESS (3" MIN), WHICHEVER IS GREATER (SEE NOTE 2)

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAW CUT ALONG STRAIGHT LINES (TYP). NO SAW CUTS WITHIN WHEEL PATH

AutoCAD SHX Text

TACK COAT ALL EXPOSED SURFACES SS-1h, 0.08-0.13 GAL/SY

AutoCAD SHX Text

CLASS A OR CLASS E (NATIVE) BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 90% MDD

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTES: : 1. BORE AND JACK OR TRENCHLESS DIRECTIONAL DRILLING IS ALLOWED. 2. PATCH WIDTH: A) PATCHES WILL BE 4 FOOT MINIMUM, ANY DIRECTION. B) IF EDGE OF PATCHING IS WITHIN 3 FEET OF EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR LIP OF GUTTER, REMOVE AND REPLACE AC PAVEMENT FROM PATCH TO THAT EDGE. C) FOR PATCHING IN PAVEMENT SURFACE THAT IS LESS THAN FIVE (5) YEARS OLD OR PCI>80, ENTIRE TRAVEL LANE WIDTH FOR FULL LENGTH OF PAVEMENT PATCH SHALL RECEIVE 1.5" MILL AND OVERLAY. D) PLACE SLURRY SEAL OR CHIP SEAL ON STREETS WITH EXISTING SLURRY SEAL OR CHIP SEAL SURFACE. 3. SURFACE TOLERANCES FOR AC PAVEMENT REPAIR SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (ORANGE BOOK). 4. ASPHALT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (ORANGE BOOK). 5. TYPE 2 CLASS B AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (ORANGE BOOK). 6. ASPHALT CEMENT SHALL BE PG 64-28 NV UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY DOUGLAS COUNTY ENGINEERING. WHEN PG 64-28 NV ASPHALT CEMENT IS NOT USED, NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE SHALL BE FOG SEALED. 7. FOR NON-COUNTY UTILITIES, PIPE ZONE BEDDING PER UTILITY PURVEYOR REQUIREMENTS. BACKFILL PER COUNTY REQUIREMENTS.

AutoCAD SHX Text

** AB TYPE 2 CLASS B COMPACTED TO 95% MDD. MATCH EXISTING OR 8" MINIMUM, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAGE 1 OF 1

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE NOTE 7

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

DOUGLAS COUNTY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DWG:

AutoCAD SHX Text

D06

AutoCAD SHX Text

JULY 2017

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAGE 1 OF 1

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPE 4R CURB INLET AND GRATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

%%USECTION B-B

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

%%UPLAN

AutoCAD SHX Text

%%USECTION A-A

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEPRESS GUTTER/ GRADE BREAK (TYP)

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOTES: : 1. SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 302 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 302 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 2. A MINIMUM OF 6-INCHES OF GRADED BEDDING MATERIAL AS DESCRIBED IN "TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH" A MINIMUM OF 6-INCHES OF GRADED BEDDING MATERIAL AS DESCRIBED IN "TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH" DETAIL D01 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED. 3. CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR H-20 TRAFFIC LOAD. CONCRETE BOX SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR H-20 TRAFFIC LOAD. 4. IF FRAME AND GRATE EXTEND BEYOND LIP OF GUTTER, PROVIDE 8-INCH THICK CONCRETE APRON. IF FRAME AND GRATE EXTEND BEYOND LIP OF GUTTER, PROVIDE 8-INCH THICK CONCRETE APRON. 5. IF SOILS AND GROUNDWATER DEPTH WILL ALLOW, DRILL 1-1/4" WEEP HOLE AT BOTTOM OF INLET TO IF SOILS AND GROUNDWATER DEPTH WILL ALLOW, DRILL 1-1/4" WEEP HOLE AT BOTTOM OF INLET TO ALLOW WATER TO INFILTRATE INTO SOIL. 6. IF NO SIDEWALK IS PRESENT, POUR 6-INCH CONCRETE CURB STRUCTURE BEHIND GRATE AND TIE BEAM IF NO SIDEWALK IS PRESENT, POUR 6-INCH CONCRETE CURB STRUCTURE BEHIND GRATE AND TIE BEAM INTO BOX. 7. TILT FRAME & GRATE AS REQUIRED TO ATTAIN 6-INCH MINIMUM FLOW OPENING AND INSTALL DURABLE TILT FRAME & GRATE AS REQUIRED TO ATTAIN 6-INCH MINIMUM FLOW OPENING AND INSTALL DURABLE SHIMS BETWEEN THE CURB BOX AND FRAME AS REQUIRED TO MATCH CURB BOX TO TOP OF CURB AND FACE OF CURB (SEE SECTION B-B).

AutoCAD SHX Text

OUTLET PIPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

TRANSITION GUTTER (TYP) DEPRESS FRAME & GRATE AT FLOW LINE. LIP OF GUTTER TO MATCH STREET GRADE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE NOTE 6

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOW

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIDEWALK

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB

AutoCAD SHX Text

FRAME, L-GRATE & CURB BOX (GRATE SHOWN FOR FLOW FROM RIGHT, REVERSE GRATE FOR FLOW FROM LEFT)

AutoCAD SHX Text

B

AutoCAD SHX Text

B

AutoCAD SHX Text

1-1/4" WEEP HOLE. SEE NOTE 5.

AutoCAD SHX Text

6" AB COMPACT TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION OR 6" DRAIN ROCK IF WEEP HOLE USED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO. 4 BAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONCRETE APRON SEE NOTE 4

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB BOX

AutoCAD SHX Text

CURB BOX

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOP OF CURB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUTTER FLOW LINE

AutoCAD SHX Text

FRAME & L GRATE (SEE NOTE 7)

AutoCAD SHX Text

MATCH STREET SLOPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

OUTLET

AutoCAD SHX Text

PIPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO. 4 BARS @ 18" EACH WAY (TYP)

AutoCAD SHX Text

FRAME & L GRATE (SEE NOTE 7)

AutoCAD SHX Text

07/19/21

C

A

LL

8

1

1

B

EFO

R

E

Y

O

U

D

I

G

RE

VIE

W S

ET

- 0

7.1

9.2

02

1

©

D

SEGMENTAL

BOX CULVERT

14' TO 24' SPANS

TYPE 1

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

BY

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEETS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET:

AutoCAD SHX Text

OF:

AutoCAD SHX Text

JOB:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING:

AutoCAD SHX Text

Y:\Client Files\0110\0110-123\CAD\Engineering\Improvement Plans\0110-123-DETAILS.dwg 7/16/2021 9:59:51 AM James Turner 7/16/2021 9:59:51 AM James Turner7/16/2021 9:59:51 AM James Turner James TurnerJames Turner

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

WWW.ROANDERSON.COM

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

JT

AutoCAD SHX Text

SG

AutoCAD SHX Text

N/A

AutoCAD SHX Text

07.19.2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

0110-123

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE PLOT STAMP

AutoCAD SHX Text

C6

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

DETAILS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CIVIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NAGASEKHAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

R. GORLA

AutoCAD SHX Text

P

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

G

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

V

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

Exp: 6/30/23

AutoCAD SHX Text

STANDARD DESIGNS AVAILABLE MEETING ASTM C1786 HL-93 OR AASHTO HS20 IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS. DESIGNS BASED ON SPECIAL LOADING OR DEPTHS OF BURY ARE AVAILABLE ON REQUEST. CUSTOM PIPE HOLES, ACCESS OPENINGS, AND SKEWED SECTIONS ARE AVAILABLE. STANDARD HEIGHTS AVAILABLE IN 6" INCREMENTS. CUSTOM HEIGHTS ARE AVAILABLE. FOR COMPLETE DESIGN AND PRODUCT INFORMATION CONTACT JENSEN PRECAST.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENDS CAN BE ENGINEERED SKEWS TO ALLOW FOR CURVES IN CULVERT RUN- NO NEED FOR SECONDARY FILLER POUR.

AutoCAD SHX Text

INTERLOCKING TOP SECTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

OPTIONAL ENGINEERED PIPE OPENINGS

AutoCAD SHX Text

SKEWED ENDS

AutoCAD SHX Text

TO FOLLOW RADIUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

OPTIONAL ACCESS OPENINGS

AutoCAD SHX Text

6/7/2021 0110-123-DETAILS.DWG 2021

AutoCAD SHX Text

Jensen Precast reserves the right to make changes to product design and/or dimensions without notice. Please contact Jensen Precast whenever necessary for confirmation or advice on product design.

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

07/19/21

water conveyance advisory committee

Documents