water availability and water demand under global change in...

29
Universität zu Köln Water availability and water demand under Global Change in Benin, West Africa GLOWA Conference Ouagadougou, 25 th – 28 th August 2008 B. Diekkrüger , M. Diederich, S. Giertz, B. Höllermann, A. Kocher, B. Reichert, and G. Steup

Upload: truongdang

Post on 20-Aug-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Universität zu Köln

Water availability and water demand under Global Change in Benin, West Africa

GLOWA ConferenceOuagadougou, 25th – 28th August 2008

B. Diekkrüger, M. Diederich, S. Giertz, B. Höllermann, A. Kocher, B. Reichert, and G. Steup

Outline

• From local scale knowledge to regional simulation

• From analysis of the current situation to scenario development and quantification

• From water availability to water demand: Is there water scarcity in Benin?

Outline

• From local scale knowledge to regional simulation

• From analysis of the current situation to scenario development and quantification

• From water availability to water demand: Is there water scarcity in Benin?

Why local scale analysis?• to understand the effects of

global change on the hydrological processes

• to be able to develop models which describe the Global Change effects correctly

Approach• local scale gained through

measurements and analysis of processes in the Ara and the Aguima catchments

• transfer of the knowledge to the whole Ouémé basin

Hydrological processes at the local scale

Process studies

Agricultural land use Natural vegetation

Saprolite

Migmatitic basement

Hillwash

e

Saprolite

Hillwash

Plinthite

Lateral processes are important! Processes differ with land use

Giertz et al. HESS 2006

e

Physical-based model on the local scaleSIMULAT- H

Aguima Catchment 16 km²

Modeling water fluxes at the local scale

Giertz & Diekkrüger GEO-ÖKO 2006

0 – 20 cm

30 – 50 cm

measured

simulated

measured

simulated

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

20.0

6.01

26.0

6.01

02.0

7.01

08.0

7.01

14.0

7.01

20.0

7.01

26.0

7.01

01.0

8.01

07.0

8.01

13.0

8.01

19.0

8.01

25.0

8.01

31.0

8.01

06.0

9.01

12.0

9.01

18.0

9.01

24.0

9.01

30.0

9.01

06.1

0.01

12.1

0.01

18.1

0.01

24.1

0.01

30.1

0.01

05.1

1.01

11.1

1.01

17.1

1.01

disc

harg

e [m

m/d

]

measured simulated

water content

• Conceptual, spatially distributed model with an unlimited numberof HRUs, defined by land use and soil types

• Evapotranspiration: optionally: Penman, Priestley-Taylor, Turc• Surface runoff: SCS curve number• Linear storage for root zone, unsaturated zone and groundwater zone• Surface reservoirs• Inland valleys

Model concept UHP-HRU

Capillary rise

Surface runoff

Percolation

Interception

Evapotranspiration

Interflow Infiltration Root zone

Base flowGroundwater zone

Unsaturated zone

Deep groundwater recharge

Catchment withHRUs

Modeling UHP-HRU Ouémé-Bonou: Validation

Save

Cotonou

Bassila

Parakou

Djougou

Natintingou

¹0 25 50 75 10012.5Kilometers

Rivière

Oueme Bonou

Oueme Save

Oueme Zangnanado

Zou Atcherigbe

Validation Ouémé Save

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

07.0

1.19

86

07.0

5.19

86

07.0

9.19

86

07.0

1.19

87

07.0

5.19

87

07.0

9.19

87

07.0

1.19

88

07.0

5.19

88

07.0

9.19

88

07.0

1.19

89

07.0

5.19

89

07.0

9.19

89

07.0

1.19

90

07.0

5.19

90

07.0

9.19

90

07.0

1.19

91

07.0

5.19

91

07.0

9.19

91

07.0

1.19

92

07.0

5.19

92

07.0

9.19

92

07.0

1.19

93

07.0

5.19

93

07.0

9.19

93

m³/s

observedsimulated

Period Surface (km²) R² MEOuémé Save (Cal) 1985-1986 49285 0.9 0.69Ouémé Save (Val) 1996-2003 49285 0.84 0.8Ouémé Zangnanado (Val) 1986-1994 23491 0.64 0.55Zou Atcheribé (Val) 1980-1993 7035 0.84 0.83

Conclusion: from local to regional scale • Knowledge on local scale processes is most important

for inland valley studies, small reservoirs studies as well as agricultural production.

• Local scale knowledge is considered in the Spatial Decision Support Systems

BenIvis Pedro

• Hydrological simulation models for the local and the regional scale have been developed and validated

• These models can be applied for scenario quantification and for Decision Support

Outline

• From local scale knowledge to regional simulation

• From analysis of the current situation to scenario development and quantification

• From water availability to water demand: Is there water scarcity in Benin?

Hydrologisches ModellUHP

SIMULAT-H

climateland use/land cover

hydrologic modelUHP-HRU

soilDEM

surface water resources

Station Parakou - rainfall distribution 1960-2000

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

<1 mm 1-5 mm 5-10 mm 10-20 mm 20-50 mm 50-100mm

>100 mm

Rainfall amount per day

Frac

tion

of to

tal r

ainf

al

simulated_mean (REMO 6 runs)measured

From climate modeling to hydrological scenarios

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 10 11 12

REMO901 REMO902 REMO903 measured

[mm

]

• Scale of climate models often do not match the scale of the hydrological models

• For linking mesoscale climate model output to a hydrological model a probability matching concerning amount and frequency distribution is required

• After post-processing the climate model output an one-way coupling of climate and hydrological model possible

Mean Potential Evapotranspiration for Parakou(1979-1993) calculated using the Penman-Monteithequation with simulated REMO-Data and measured data

Simulated climate scenariosOuémé Bonou

0

50

100

150

200

250

1985-1995 1995-2004 2005-2015 2015-2025 2025-2035 2035-2045

[mm

/a]

Simulated usingmeasurements

A1B B1

Renewable water resources

Universität zu Köln

Comparison of renewable water resourcesperiod 1995-2004 and scenario A1B 2035-2045

Save

Cotonou

Bassila

Parakou

Djougou

Natintingou

¹0 25 50 75 10012.5Kilometers

Renewable water ressourcesMean 2035-2045 [mm/y]

40 - 60

61 - 80

81 - 100

101 - 120

121 - 140

141 - 160

161 - 180

181 - 200

201 - 220

221 - 260

261 - 280

281 - 400

Rivers

Save

Cotonou

Bassila

Parakou

Djougou

Natintingou

¹0 25 50 75 10012.5Kilometers

Renewable water ressourcesMean 1995-2004 [mm/y]

40 - 60

61 - 80

81 - 100

101 - 120

121 - 140

141 - 160

161 - 180

181 - 200

201 - 220

221 - 260

261 - 280

281 - 400

Rivers

Conclusion: hydrological scenarios

• The scenarios reveal a significant decrease of available water resources in the Ouémé basin

• Detailed and distributed information on water availability is provided based on a thorough understanding of the processes

• The model is implemented in the Spatial Decision Support System BenHydro which allows to analyze the effects of climate change, land use change, reservoirs etc. on water availability

• Test the SDSS BenHydro

Outline

• From local scale knowledge to regional simulation

• From analysis of the current situation to scenario development and quantification

• From water availability to water demand: Is there water scarcity in Benin?

Is water a scarce resource in Benin?

• currently 4000 m3/cap/a (critical < 1700 m3/cap/a)but• water scarcity at the local scale is currently observed at

the end of the dry season (although often due to economic reasons)

• poor drinking water quality• increase in population cause a decrease in water

availability per capita (halving every 22 years)• increase in irrigation agriculture and livestock causes an

increase in water demand

Aquifer properties

~10 m

~50 m

Saturated thickness

Watervolume

Specific Yield [-]

0.03

0.0001Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07

337

338

339

340

341

342

343

Wat

er ta

ble

elev

atio

n

Fô-Bouré

Seasonal water level fluctuation of 2.5 meters in the weathered zone influence the water storage by about 25 %

300 l/m2

5 l/m2

Average water storage: 305 l/m2

98% in the weathered zone

Balancing water availability and water demandWEAP: Water Evaluation and Planning System

WEAP is able to• use external simulation results concerning water availability

or use integrated simple hydrological modeling • consider surface water reservoirs• compute water demand considering different sectors

– domestic water use– agricultural water use– industrial water use

and to consider access to water • consider water price development• to compute water quality• …

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

%

#

#

%

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

%

#

#

##

# %

#

#

#

%

#

#

% #

#

%

#

#

#

%

#

%#%

#

%

#

#

#

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

#

#

#%

# ##

#

#

#

#

#

##

% ##

#

#

##

# #%

#

##

##

###

#

#

#

%

##

#

#

##

#

%

#

##

#

# #

#

#

#

#

%

%

##

#

#

#

#

# #

#

#

#

#

###

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

## ##

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

##

##

##

###

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

###

#

#

##

###

#

##

##

#

#

#

## #

# ##

##

##

#

#

##

#

#

##

##

##

##

#

#

#

#

##

##

# #

##

#

#

##

##

##

#

#

# #

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

%

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

# #

#

##

#

#

##

#

#

#

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

$

$

$

$

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

##

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

Com

mun

eTc

haou

rou

Com

mun

eO

uess

e

Sub-basin no. 93

Oue

me

catc

hmen

twith

27

sub-

basi

ns

• 27 sub-basins

• 5 departments

• 34 communes

• 32 river segments

• 28 groundwater aquifers

• 188 demand sites

• 4 reservoirs (Djougou, Parakou, Savalou, Savé)

• monthly time steps

Application of WEAP to the Ouémé basin

Scenario development

Climate scenarios:IPCC A1B oder B1

B1: Economic growth

and consolidation of decentralization

B2: Economic stagnation

and institutional insecurity

B3: Business as

Usual

Scenarios developed for

1. Domestic water use

2. Agricultural water demand (irrigation agriculture, livestock)

3. Industrial water demand

Water demand per sector and scenario in Mm³/a

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5Ye

ar 2

002

Year

200

5Ye

ar 2

010

Year

201

5Ye

ar 2

020

Year

202

5

Domestic: Rural Domestic: Urban Industry Periurban Irrigation Basfonds Irrigation Large Scale Irrigation Livestock

Scenario B1 Scenario B2 Scenario B3

Scenario

Domestic: Domestic: Industry Periurban Inland Large Livestock Rural Urban Irrigation Valley Scale

Irrigation Irrigation

B1: economic growth B2: economic stagnation B3: business as usual

Total monthly water demand in Mm³mean over 2002 - 2025

B1: economic growth B2: economic stagnation B3: business as usual

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

January

Febru

ary

March

April

May

June July

AugustSep

tember

October

November

Decem

ber

Total unmet demand in Mm³IPCC climate scenario A1B

B1: economic growth B2: economic stagnation B3: business as usual

-

5

10

15

20

2520

02

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Unmet demand per sector and scenario in Mm³IMPETUS B1 economic growth with

IPCC climate scenario A1B

-

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Urban Rural Livestock Periurban Irrigation

Total monthly unmet demand in Mm³IMPETUS B1 economic growth with

IPCC climate scenario A1B

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

January

Febru

ary

March

April

May

June

July

AugustSep

tember

October

November

Decem

ber

Scenario B1 A1B 2015 -2025 Scenario B1 A1B 2002 - 2014

Conclusion: water demand• Scenario calculations reveal an

– increase in water demand due to an increase in domestic water use and irrigation agriculture

– increase in total unmet demand (2015 – 2025)

– increase in length of the water scarcity period up to 8 to 10 months with a peak from December to March

– increasing pressure on reservoirs and surface water

• User relying upon groundwater are less affected although groundwater level decreases (economic scarcity possible)

• Test the Spatial Decision Support System BenEau

BenEAU

Conclusion

• The analysis of water availability and water demand reveals that water is one of the key issues for sustainable development in Benin

• The IMPETUS studies are important for supporting the Integrated Water Resource Management process which is currently developing in Benin

• Based on the interdisciplinary modeling approach a number of Spatial Decision Support Systems have been developed which links knowledge gained at different scale with scenario development

• Please visit the poster session and test our SDSS

Thank you for your attention

Universität zu Köln