washington state center for court research what exactly is it that we do? improve accountability and...
TRANSCRIPT
Washington State Center for Court Research
What Exactly Is It That We Do?
Improve Accountability and Effectiveness for Washington’s Courts with Analysis, Evaluation, and Operational Management Tools
Court Contact and Recidivism Database
Demographics
Offender History
(juvenile and adult)
Dependency
Status Offending
(Becca)
• 1980 to now
• Person, case, court, charge, case and charge outcome, dependency case processing, RCW, charge severity, DOB, race (ðnicity), sex, jurisdiction, LFO, warrants, referral agency, WSIPP law category
• Need better data for detention, jail, prison, and felony sentencing
• A person-level file
473S32,81-7-01643-7 S DEP 10/22/1981 *SW 13.34.030 DEPENDENCY473S32,84-7-00092-1 S DEP 3/20/1984 *SW 13.34.030 DEPENDENCY473S32,87-7-00340-2 S DEP 10/1/1987 *SW 13.34.030 DEPENDENCY473J32,90-R-011723 J JO 8/30/1990 8/28/1990*SW 9A.56.050 THEFT-3473J32,90-R-011724 J JO 10/17/1990 10/16/1990*SW 9A.48.090(2)(A) MALICIOUS MISCHIEF-3 HARM>$50473S32,90-8-01135-2 S JO 10/19/1990 10/19/1990*SW 9A.48.080(1)(A) MALIC MISCHIEF-2 PROP DMGE >$250473J32,90-R-011725 J JO 12/17/1990 12/14/1990*SW 9A.36.041 ASSAULT-4473S32,90-8-01378-9 S JO 12/28/1990 12/28/1990*SW 9A.36.041 ASSAULT 4TH DEGREE473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D CN 8/19/1996 8/17/1996*SW 66.44.270.2A MINOR POSS AND/OR CONSUMPTION473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D CN 8/19/1996 8/17/1996*SW 9A.76.020 OBSTRUCT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D CN 8/19/1996 8/17/1996*SW 9A.48.090 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 3 DEGREE473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D CN 8/19/1996 8/17/1996*SW 66.44.100 OPEN OR CONSUME LIQUOR IN PUBLIC473SPD,SPPCK0528564CN D CN 8/19/1996 8/17/1996*SW 9A.36.050 RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT473SPD,SPPCK0528564CN D CN 8/19/1996 8/17/1996*SW 9A.52.080 CRIMINAL TRESPASS-2ND DEGREE473SPM,SPPK00538599CN M CN 5/30/1997 5/29/1997SPM 10.12.050.B TRESPASS PREMISES 2ND473SPM,SPPK00538443CN M CN 6/2/1997 5/31/1997SPM 10.12.050.A TRESPASS BUILDING 1ST473SPM,SPPK00540706CN M CN 6/3/1997 6/3/1997SPM 10.12.050.B TRESPASS PREMISES 2ND473SPM,SPPK00540706CN M CN 6/3/1997 6/3/1997SPM 10.15.100 POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA473SPM,SPPK00540706CN M CN 6/3/1997 6/3/1997SPM 10.12.050.A TRESPASS BUILDING 1ST473SPM,SPPK00538868CN M CN 6/16/1997 6/14/1997SPM 10.12.050.B TRESPASS PREMISES 2ND473SPM,SPPM00004730CNM CN 2/2/1998 1/31/1998SPM 10.15.100 POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA473SPM,SPPK00539973CN M CN 2/18/1998 2/17/1998*SW 9A.52.080 CRIMINAL TRESPASS-2ND DEGREE473SPM,SPPM00005963CNM CN 3/27/1998 3/27/1998SPM 10.11.010DV ASSAULT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE473SPM,SPPM00007906CNM CN 6/2/1998 6/1/1998SPM 10.15.110 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA473SPM,SPPM00022662CNM CN 11/2/1999 10/28/1999SPM 10.10.100 UNLAWFUL BUS CONDUCT473SPM,SPPM00026589CNM CN 11/15/1999 11/13/1999SPM 10.10.025 PEDESTRIAN INTERFERENCE473SPD,SPPM00034833CN D CN 8/25/2000 8/24/2000*SW 9A.48.050 RECKLESS BURNING-2ND DEGREE473SPD,SPPM00034833CN D CN 8/25/2000 8/24/2000*SW 9A.84.030 DISORDERLY CONDUCT473SPM,SPPM00031846CNM CN 9/25/2000 9/22/2000SPM 10.15.100 POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA473SPM,SPPM00031846CNM CN 9/25/2000 9/22/2000SPM 10.15.110 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA473SPM,SPPM00031847CNM CN 9/25/2000 9/25/2000SPM 10.08.210.A FURNISH LIQUOR TO MINORS473SPM,SPPB00038596CN M CN 11/15/2004 11/13/2004*SW 10.99.050 NO CONTACT ORDER VIOLATION473SPM,SPPB00038687CN M CN 12/30/2004 12/29/2004SPM 10.09.060DV VIOL OF PROTECTION ORDER473S32,05-1-00298-1 S CR 1/28/2005 1/23/2005*SW 69.50.401(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATION473S32,05-1-00298-1 S CR 1/28/2005 4/5/2004*SW 69.50.401(D) CONT SUBST VIOL - SECTION (D)473S32,05-1-00298-1 S CR 1/28/2005 1/23/2005*SW 69.50.401(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATION473S32,05-1-00298-1 S CR 1/28/2005 4/5/2004*SW 69.50.401(D) CONT SUBST VIOL - SECTION (D)473S32,05-1-00298-1 S CR 1/28/2005 1/23/2005*SW 69.50.4013(1) CONT SUB-POSSESS NO PRESCRIPTION473S32,05-1-00298-1 S CR 1/28/2005 4/5/2004*SW 69.50.401(D) CONT SUBST VIOL - SECTION (D)
the eggs and flour…
Multisystem Involvement
the cake
Multisystem involvement by race and ethnicity, youth with offender referrals 2005 to 2009
American Indian/ Alaska Native Black Hispanic White Asian/ Pacific Islander0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
16% 15%26%
16% 19%
26% 23%13%
17% 11%
34%
20% 15%16%
9%
Truancy petition & delinquency referral
CA accepted referral & delinquency referral
CA accepted referral, truancy petition, & delinquency referral
Race, CA, and Prior Offender Referrals
No Prior 1 Prior 2+ Priors0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
24%
48%54%
42%
55%
70%
White Black
Percent with Substantial CA History(either investigation or legal action)
NCJJ Cross-Systems King County Study
NCJJ Cross-Systems King County Study
No CA History Referral Only CA Investigation Legal Action/Placement
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
26%
38% 38%
53%
18 month recidivism after first offender referral,
by CA involvement
Youth Referred on Offender Matters with Prior CPS Referral
17% – 41%
42% – 46%47% – 62%
CCRD also supports DMC analysis for juveniles and adults
2. Select calendar year 4 .TYPE in shaded cell to change minimum values 102010
[default is 10 observations; min of 1 is required]
Summary: Relative Rate Index Compared with White Juveniles
Reported data (unadjusted)
Data displayed for Pierce
Calendar year 2010
Black, non-
Hispanic HispanicAsian or Pacific Islander,
non-HispanicAmerican Indian or Alaska
Native, non-Hispanic All Minorities Base for rates2. Juvenile Arrests*** 2.79 ** 0.71 0.80 1.81 per 1,000 population3. Refer to Juvenile Court 2.93 0.94 0.80 1.54 1.62 per 1,000 population4. Referrals filed with JDO codes B+ or above
1.77 1.38 0.93 X 1.55per 100 referrals
5. Cases diverted 0.56 0.94 1.17 0.66 0.72 per 100 referrals6. Non-petitioned referrals 0.71 0.86 1.09 1.01 0.81 per 100 referrals7. Petitioned referrals 1.52 1.26 0.83 0.98 1.34 per 100 referrals8. Adjudicated cases 1.06 0.98 0.96 1.11 1.03 per 100 petitioned9. Adjudicated cases with JRA dispositions 1.68 1.10 X X 1.61 per 100 adjudicated cases10. Cases with local dispositions 1.52 1.26 0.83 0.98 1.34 per 100 referrals11. Cases handled in adult court X X X X X per 100 referralsGroup meets 1% threshold? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Key:
** No data available for this stage
X too few cases to calculate a reliable rate
Bold : significant
Assessment Research Database
– 2004 to now– All juveniles screened as moderate or high risk– record of treatment eligibility, participation, and
completion– A person-level file
Criminal History, School, Use of Free Time, Employment, Relationships, Family History, Current Living Arrangements, Alcohol and Drug Use, Mental Health, Attitudes/Behaviors, Aggression, Skills
Evidence Based Programs UtilizationAggression
Replacement Training
Functional Family
Therapy
Multi-Systemic Therapy
1178
149(13%)
65 (44%)
2,347
883(38%)
451(51%)
3,055
1,075(35%)
578(54%)
# Eligible:
# Referred:
# Started:
# of Courts (2010)
Number of Cases = 4,474
(N=29) (N=24) (N=2)
0
20
40
60
80
100
2007 2008 2009 2010
% Su
ccessf
ul Co
mple
teProportion of Youth Successfully Completing
EBP's by Fiscal Year, 2007-2010
WSART
COS
FFT
FIT
MST
Washington StateAggression Replacement Training
Among Offenders, 2004-2006
13
32%
68%
Not El-igible
EligibleFor ART
21%
79%
Did Not Start
Started ART
69%
31%
Completed ART
Did Not Complete
Felony Recidivism: 30.8%
Felony Recidivism: 36.7%
Felony Recidivism: 27.6%
Court Contact? CheckNeeds Assessment? CheckAnything Else? Tools for QA
Education Research Database
SKYWARD STUDENT MANAGEMENTAssessmentsAttendanceCensus/DemographicsDisciplineFood ServiceGradebooksReport Cards & Transcripts
ERD & Fundamental Research
ERD and the old Truancy Petition Process
Washington Assessments of the Risks and Needs of Students WARNS Youth Survey
• AGGRESSION-DEFIANCE
• DEPRESSION-ANXIETY
• SUBSTANCE ABUSE
• PEER DEVIANCE
• FAMILY ENVIRONMENT
• SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT
Need Categories:
Low Moderate High
• Demographics
• School
• Barriers to Attendance
• Family
• Traumatic Experiences
• Criminal Justice
bullying, gang affiliation, smoking
Needs Scales Other areas of assessment
80-item self-report 10 – 20 minutes 5th grade reading-level (English)
Paper & Online versions Real-time individual-level results FREE
Goals
• Develop a risk and needs assessment for schools, courts, and service providers:
(1) identify youths at risk of truancy, delinquency, and dropping out of school
(2) assess youth development in the educational, social, and psychological domains
(3) brief and easy to administer, interpret
(4) provide immediate, real-time scoring and reporting
WARNS Versions
Paper Online
WARNS Reports: Student-identified Administrations
Paper: Indiv. Needs Summaries ReportOnline: Individual WARNS Report
Needs of Truant Kids…
0
10
20
30
40
50
1418
6
12
1815
3034
40
32
39
47
Non-truant Truant%
Percentage of Truant and Non-truant High School Students Scoring in the HIGH Needs Category
WARNS + School + Juvenile Court Information = Insight
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1621
12 12
23
12
47
37
49
37
31
5354
19
5249
25
39
CTB Status Off. Criminal Off.%
Percentage of Community Truancy Board Participants, Status Offenders, and Criminal Offenders Scoring in the HIGH Needs
Category
Washington State Center for Court Research
accountability and effectiveness for Washington’s Courts with analysis, evaluation, and operational management tools
Carl McCurley, Ph.D.Manager, Washington State Center for Court ResearchAdministrative Office of the [email protected]://www.courts.wa.gov/wsccr/