war: a book of mormon perspective
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
1/286
War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
How the War Chapters of the Book of Mormon Warn Against Wars of Aggression and
the Warfare State
by Kendal Anderson
Book design and layout copyright © Karen E. Hoover
Cover design copyright © 2014 by Tatiana Villa
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by
any means whatsoever without written permission from the author, except in the case of brief
quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.
Copyright © 2014 by Kendal Anderson
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
2/286
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
3/286
Dedicated to Jesus Christ — The Prince of Peace — who taught us to love our enemies
and petitioned His Father to forgive those who were at that very moment attempting to take
His life.
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
4/286
Table of Contents
Foreword
About the Author & Preface
Chapter 1 – Introduction
Chapter 2 – Principles of Defensive Warfare; America’s Two Just Wars
Chapter 3 – Wars of Aggression are Revolts Against Christ
Chapter 4 – Just War Theory and the Nephite Experience
Chapter 5 – Conscription versus Covenant
Chapter 6 – The Nationalistic Disease
Chapter 7 – War Collectivism
Chapter 8 – Economic Sanctions
Chapter 9 – Waging War on Civilians
Chapter 10 – Amalickiah and False Flag Operations
Chapter 11 – Betrayal at Yalta: Fruits of the Last “ Good War ”
Chapter 12 – Waging War on Ideologies: A Dangerous Delusion
Chapter 13 – A Misunderstood Hero
Appendix A: Selected Speeches and Writings Against the Warfare State
Section 1a – The Draft is Unconstitutional, by Daniel Webster
Section 2a – No Treason, by Lysander Spooner
Section 3a – The Conquest of the United States by Spain, by William Graham Sumner
Section 4a – War, Peace, and the State, by Murray N. Rothbard
Section 5a – The Glory of War, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Section 6a – Peace is the Father of all Things. by Ludwig Von Mises
Section 7a – Should a Christian Join the Military? by Laurence M. Vance
Appendix B: Selected Writings From Fellow Saints
Section 1b – Open Letter to Mormons Regarding Ron Paul: An LDS View of War, by Jeremy Ashton
Section 2b - What Is The Age Of Accountability For A Latter-day Saint Serviceman? by Rock
Waterman
Section 3b – Speaking Truth to Power: 9/11 — My Reflections Ten Years Later, by Ron Madson
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
5/286
Section 4b – The True Meaning of Peace, by Benjamin A. Thompson
Section 5b – War! by Tim Urling
Section 6b – Military Keynesianism, by Irven Hill
Section 7b – Truly Constitutional and Superior Homeland Security, by Collin Theis
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
6/286
Foreword
I am Anon Mous. We are Legion. We do not forget.
The best part about Anonymous and the reason that it's so successful is because it's
decentralized. Anonymous has all kinds — white knights, black hats, mad-hatters, crackers, trolling
net-scatters, and more. We are the conscious, the subconscious, and the unconscious. We are the
obscurity from the obscurity, yet there are those who rise out of such obscurity when needed in
order to reflect the light of Truth. That is needed now more than ever before.
We are less concerned with personal identities or institutions (especially centralized ones) and
more about ideas and works. Consider the ideas, the works, and the results. Many of us from around
the world have studied the contents of this book and have decided that they are so important that
we will support them forever, regardless of persecution. We invite everyone alive to also study the
information within this book as we have and make the same decision for yourselves because the
results of doing so would be the end of aggressive warfare and many other terrible things and would
lead to improved lives for everyone. This book is even a great benefit to those who are not religious.
Wouldn't you like to be able to educate Christians about what their God tells them to do concerning
these things and hold them to the Peaceful standard of the Golden Rule and the rest of their own
teachings rather than allowing them to engage in mockeries of Christianity through aggressive warfare such as the 'crusades'? These 'crusades' continue today in various ways, yet you could help to
end them and avoid much further suffering and death if the contents of this book are adhered to.
Are you not from the United States and/or maybe don't think that the contents of this book
apply to you and/or your loved-ones? If so, then you are dangerously wrong and are missing a
prime opportunity to improve your own life and that of all others. The United States effects all the
world and the things within this book are timeless and apply everywhere, not just within the United
States. Are you a member of a foreign nation, have resources, and would like the aggression,
deceiving, and other harm of the United States to end Peacefully? If so, then all you need to do is to
promote this book in its unaltered form among the People of the United States, who are still largely
ignorant of the information within. It is a fact that it only takes 3% of a population to accomplish
beneficial and enduring change on a very large scale, and the contents of this book are worthy of
100% of the support that can be offered because the results so greatly benefit everyone.
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
7/286
Do you perhaps believe that it's pointless or even harmful to get involved in the political
process at this point? It's understandable that you might feel that way, as many do, but not being
politically active yourself only gives more power to corruption and makes ever-worsening murderous
government-sponsored carnage inevitable. Instead, study and live by the contents of this book and
you will know exactly which politicians to elect based on their works, their public record, and their
platform rather than their party, power, attractiveness, and/or lies.
Share this information in any way that you know how as virally as possible. Be ready and able to
accurately discuss these things with your family, friends, co-workers, internet acquaintances, and
more. Ask politicians running for office what they think of this philosophy and use that to inform
your vote — though the ideal is for those who support these things to vote each-other into office and
implement them according to the People and Constitutional Rule of Law.
Expect us.
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
8/286
About the Author & Preface
My name is Kendal Anderson. I live in Ammon, Idaho, and run a small business in sprinklers,
lawn care, and pest control. I have a beautiful family consisting of my wife Christy, my son Caleb,
and my step-son Kadeon. Although I don’t have a college degree, I have a strange affinity for
reading books that most would consider boring. For the last 12 years or so, I have embarked on a
journey of independent study that has culminated in the writing of this book, which is the first of
what I hope will be more. My journey began with a spiritual study, evolved into a more secular
approach, and ended up being a synthesis of the two. I have been trying for the last five years to
reconcile my Mormon theology with secular libertarianism. This endeavor became much easier
when I put aside the cultural traditions that have crept into Mormonism over the past 200 years and
decided to look to the scriptures instead. What I gleaned from this process is that the Book of
Mormon is full of teachings that coincide with the libertarian philosophy of non-aggression. This
non-aggression axiom is not unlike the Savior’s own teachings in the New Testament that we have
aptly named 'the Golden Rule'.
The first book I read that really inaugurated my intellectual journey was W. Cleon Skousen’s The
Naked Communist. As a young man of 23, I shirked my collegiate studies — which were riddled with
establishment pap — in favor of used books by obscure men that I felt taught me real truth.
Frederick Bastiat’s The Law is another that comes to mind. At about the same time, I discovered H.
Verlan Andersen’s work— an LDS author and former BYU professor. His magnum opus, Many Are
Called, But Few Are Chosen, is a must-read for Latter-day Saints who are seeking to understand the
relationship between the Gospel and liberty. These and other books helped to prepare me for what
would come next and much later. About five years ago, I discovered the Mises Institute, which is one
of the largest libertarian think-tanks in the world, or at least commensurate with the other great like-
minded think-tanks such as the Cato and Independent Institutes. Working as a laborer in my father’s
cabinet shop, I purchased my first IPod and downloaded endless hours of libertarian lectures oneconomics, politics, war, and history. Needless to say, the hours of mindless labor passed by a much
greater velocity than they had before when I was forced to listen to Spanish and Country music
blaring through a loud speaker.
I was introduced to men like Ludwig Von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Henry Hazlitt, Lew
Rockwell, Walter Block, Robert Higgs, John Denson, Tom Woods, Tom DiLorenzo, and Bob
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
9/286
Murphy. These men were and are echoing ideas that were laid down in the Book of Mormon and
taught here on the American continent millennia ago. Many of these men are not religious at all but
are in tune with principles that the Lord Himself wanted recorded by a fallen people who speak to
us from the dust. These principles can be summarized into the following categories; free markets,
voluntary charity, pacifism, just war, natural rights, and the evils of bloated government. I chose to
write about just war because I have seen so many of my fellow Saints buy into the jingoistic lies
propagated by the government. So many who have the Book of Mormon in hand capitulate to the
worship of the State, it’s military and police, it’s foreign adventures, it’s sanctions, and it’s insatiable
appetite to be the world’s police.
With this in mind, I decided to search deep within the war chapters of the Book of Mormon to
see just what kind of message Mormon was attempting to portray by including twenty- plus chapters
about a war between the Nephites and the Lamanites. I didn’t casually study these chapters; instead,they consumed me for several months. I would listen to them over and over again in attempts to
dissect every morsel of information. Why — I would ask myself — did the Lord want us to know
these things? Why did Mormon say that if all men were like unto Captain Moroni then the devil
would lose his power? What does Captain Moroni’s Title of Liberty, or Amalickiah’s coup, or
Pahoran’s stand against the kingmen, have to do with Christianity? Why did the righteous Nephites
never go into the lands of the enemy to attack? And why did Mormon resign from his position of
military commander when his people desired to go into Lamanite lands and exact vengeance on
them by the sword? I attempt to answer these and other questions within this book.
There are also other important reasons that I wrote this book. First and foremost, I love liberty.
I think that war is ugly, reprehensible, and that it brings out the worst in people and nations. War is
the worst crime committed by governments because murder is far worse than stealing or enslaving.
And war-like nationalism is perhaps the easiest way for governments to deceive their constituents.
On a more personal level, I decided to engage in this work because of a strong spiritual prompting
that moved me to action. I remember skipping the last hour of church one day (Priesthood
meeting) — a common practice of mine — and retiring home to my couch to engage in my Sundaystudy of something a little more interesting than regurgitated conference talks. As I sat pondering
the Book of Mormon, an overwhelming feeling came over me that I should write a book using the
ancient record as the general theme. At first, I began writing on the general subject of liberty, but I
found this to be exhausting, overwhelming, and entirely too vague. After several months and 100
pages of manuscript, I changed the theme to just warfare. This more specific topic allowed me to
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
10/286
write with greater ease and more purpose. I discovered Doctrine and Covenants Section 98 — a
revelation given to Joseph Smith about when the Lord justifies war, which was given in response to
the persecution of the early Saints by the Missourians.
D&C 98 correlated with the message of Captain Moroni’s war of defense against the
Lamanites, as well as many preceding and contemporary libertarian theorists on just war. I
discovered the writings of J. Reuben Clark — a constitutional scholar who was called to the First
Presidency after years of inactivity and working on Sunday. He condemned the dropping of the
atomic bombs on Japan in a general conference of 1946 and referred to the incident as “fiendish
butchery.” Subsequently, I discovered the First Presidency message of 1945 that condemned
conscription. I was finding that secular and spiritual sources were coming together to witness to the
truthfulness of the message of Peace contained within the ancient records of the Nephites.
Finally, the real value that has come from my journey throughout this work is a deeperappreciation for the Savior’s supernal pacifism. If there is anything that I hope that this book
portrays to my fellow Saints, it’s that Jesus would never condone us in our “kill ‘em all in the name
of ‘Merica” mentality, or wars of aggression, so-called 'nation building' that is actually imperial
mercantilism, our torture, and/or any attacks on human rights. The Lord teaches that the true
Christian way is to love our enemies, even while they are in the very act of crucifying us, as the
Prince of Peace so perfectly demonstrated.
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
11/286
Chapter 1
Introduction
Peace is built into us. We don’t naturally want war. The Light of Christ (that which helps us to
discern between right and wrong) speaks Peace to our souls. We all possess an innate pacifism that
resonates, a priori, the knowledge that war is wrong, inhumane, degenerate, and abhorrent. Yet, our
respective governments tell us that war is noble, honorable, and necessary to preserve freedom,
security, and peace. How, then, are we to know if the cause of war is just and if our government is
telling the truth? In this age of mass brainwashing, government-controlled media, and the unlimited
amount of information available on the internet, it is difficult to distinguish between right and
wrong, truth and error. Many of us have been conditioned to receive our information directly from
government or government-approved sources such as Fox News, CNN, and CNBC, while others
prefer the free market of ideas found online. There are so many voices out there declaring so many
variations of doctrine that it has become extremely difficult to ascertain true principles of right and
wrong.
It seems as though humanity is struggling for answers, especially in regard to the proper use of
violence against so – called enemies/criminals/terrorists, etc . Is it truly ethical to seek out and destroy
potential aggressors before they have a chance to “get” us? Is this method of preemptively rootingout evil justified from a normative, moral perspective? Or, do those who support “taking out” our
enemies before they can cause harm actually make murderers of themselves instead? I wrote this
book to help bring clarity to those who are struggling for answers to questions such as these. I
believe that the principles and axioms laid down in Christendom give us a proper guide in regard to
when it is righteous to wage war. Although many nations and armies have killed collectively in the
name of Christ, I believe those choices to be gross misrepresentations of the doctrines of the
Master. Jesus taught the Golden Rule, which admonishes us to treat others as we wish to be treated
(Luke 6:31). This principle is not unlike the non-aggression axiom of libertarian philosophy, which is
defined in the following way by libertarian Walter Block:
The non-aggression axiom is the lynchpin of the philosophy of libertarianism.
It states, simply, that it shall be legal for anyone to do anything he wants, provided
only that he not initiate (or threaten) violence against the person or legitimately
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
12/286
owned property of another. That is, in the free society, one has the right to
manufacture, buy or sell any good or service at any mutually agreeable terms. Thus,
there would be no victimless crime prohibitions, price controls, and government
regulation of the economy, etc.1
When the Golden Rule and the non-aggression axiom are applied to warfare, it becomes
evident that preemptive war is illegitimate and illogical. To illustrate the point, we will consider that
person A has become suspicious of their next-door neighbor — person B — whom person A thinks is
harboring weapons that might be dangerous to A's family and possibly to the rest of the
neighborhood. Person A sends spies to collect intelligence about B and finds that person B is indeed
very well armed. However, A has no proof that person B intends to use these resources maliciously
against others. For all person A knows, person B may only wish to stockpile such weapons as a
precaution against the potential aggression of others. Regardless of B’s intentions, A holds a
meeting with the rest of the neighborhood and they determine through a democratic vote that B is a
dangerous threat and needs to be removed before person B “attacks” someone. Although there have
not yet been any victims of person B’s alleged malevolent thought crimes, the neighborhood militia
moves in on B’s premises and stealthily apprehends then executes person B without a trial or any
due process of law.
Most people who hear this story would agree that person A was out of line and indeed the true
aggressor; still, how many would decry governments and nations for doing the same thing? SaddamHussein never committed an act of violence against the United States, yet the government used the
above rationale to “take him out before he got us.” Even if he had been harboring weapons of mass
destruction as alleged, he had not used them against Americans, and if it is illegitimate to even
possess such weapons (as it can be argued from a libertarian perspective) then the American
government and others also should have been disarmed from possessing such weapons. However,
Iraq was preemptively attacked, Saddam ousted, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians were
sacrificed for the “greater good.” I argue in this book that preemption is not the Lord’s way, and that
true followers of Christ are only justified in the use of violence when they and their families are
actually under attack by aggressors or invaders. Thus, the victims of such crimes are vindicated in
fighting to preserve their lives, families, religion, lands, property, and other inalienable rights.
Fighting for any other reason violates the Golden Rule and the non-aggression axiom, as well as the
foundational tenets of Christianity.
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
13/286
The Lord has truly given us a handbook that lays out the rules of righteous warfare. This
handbook was translated by Joseph Smith, Jr. and published in 1830 as “ Another Testament of Jesus
Christ” and is also known as the Book of Mormon . Named after the prophet/historian Mormon —
who compiled a thousand years of history — this book details an account of an ancient people of
Hebrew descent who inhabited the American continent. Mormon gives us a history of their
preaching, prophesying, contentions, wars, and ultimate destruction. In the heart of the book, there
are several chapters which deal with a major war between two groups known as the Nephites and
the Lamanites. The history of this war clearly distinguishes that the Lamanites were the aggressors
and lays out the proper war protocol for Christians who find themselves under attack. The Nephites
only fought to preserve their families, lands, properties, and religion, and in conducting the war
abstained from conscription to raise armies or compulsive taxation to fund the war. The Nephites
never used torture on Lamanite prisoners and even taught them the Gospel and set them free afterthe war, allowing many of them to remain among the Nephites where they enjoyed more Liberty
than the Lamanite government allowed. Mormon also regrettably informs us that several hundred
years later — during his own day — the Nephites devolved toward a more aggressive foreign policy
which eventually led to their demise. When these teachings are applied to our modern day, it
becomes obvious that we are falling into the same trap that our Nephite progenitors fell victim to.
As the saying goes, those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.
I realize that many who come across this work may not believe in the literal reality of the
Nephite civilization existing on the American continent. To those, I offer an invitation to consider
the principles of just war found within the Book of Mormon as works of literary genius that are
concomitant with just war theory and the libertarian principle of non-aggression. Even if the Book
of Mormon were a fable, the axioms found within its pages are of paramount importance in regards
to personal liberty. To those who believe it to be an authentic record of Israelite history, I would
offer an in vitation to consider that the Lord’s rules of warfare are a moral imperative that must be
adhered to if one truly desires to obey the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I would submit that it is
inconsistent with the religion that Joseph Smith, Jr. restored for any to parrot the official worldlypolicy of preemption while simultaneously professing to be a disciple of Christ. Remember; Jesus
taught us to love our enemies, not to kill them all in the name of national 'security'.
That said, I would invite all to cast off the chains of cognitive dissonance and read my book. It
is not just written to LDS Christians or other Christians exclusively, but is extended to all
audiences — including atheists, deists, agnostics, liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. All will find
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
14/286
common ground in the message of Peace contained within these pages. For those who would
dismiss my book based solely on the belief that it is seemingly associated with the 'Mormon church',
I would offer the following disclaimer: This book has no official affiliation with the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints and there are many within that religion who would strongly disagree with
the perspectives shared herein — even among its leadership. In fact, the Book of Mormon is a work
independent of any religion much like the Holy Bible , and I believe that the message contained within
its pages is intended for all people, especially that its declaration of Christian Peace is universal and
ubiquitous.
Although there is quite a bit of American history included in this work, the focus is centered on
principles of right and wrong. Using a combination of conventional history and lessons from the
Book of Mormon , I strive to point out the fallacies of the modern warfare state. Contrary to the
opinions of many readers and students, it is fact that the Book of Mormon teaches non-aggression. This assertion may seem strange in spite of the many wars and contentions included in the narrative
of the book — however, when it is studied in context, one can conclude that the Lord only condones
defensive warfare. In fact, the Lord has a very strict set of rules that must be followed before an
individual or group is morally justified in the use of violence. Not surprisingly, these rules
corroborate with the principles of just war theory and natural law laid down by the great
philosophers of the past. I endeavor to point out in this book the evils of preemptive war, military
conscription, jingoistic nationalism, war collectivism, economic sanctions, and perhaps the most
pernicious evil — the waging of war against innocent civilians.
Unfortunately, the government has managed to convince the majority of the American people
that the above actions are moral and just, and somehow prerequisite to preserving our nation’s
freedom. Such an argument (that killing innocents in the name of God, family, and/or country
makes us freer) is most absurd. The reader will discover as they peruse this book that each category
of state-sponsored evil is broken down to its most logical conclusion, that: preemptive war is
unprovoked violence, military conscription is slavery, jingoistic nationalism is abstract hatred, war
collectivism is just another excuse to increase economic regulation and raise taxes, economicsanctions deprive innocents of food and medicine, and civilian warfare equals mass-murder and
genocide. Government not only expects its citizens to accept these absurdities, it demands total
obedience and allegiance from them. The truth is that no person owes the government anything , for
its very existence is rationally impossible without the people. By nature, it is a parasitic entity that
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
15/286
cannot continue without a host. It does not and cannot produce anything, and it cannot transfer the
slightest modicum of wealth without first extracting it from its productive citizenry.
To say that we owe the government our obedience, our allegiance, our wealth, and even our
lives is like saying that we owe the same to a common highway robber that plunders us “for our own
good” over and over and over again, and then declares that we are “safer” because of our
“privilege” of being robbed. Lysander Spooner — a great libertarian philosopher of the 19th
century — was profoundly correct when he referred to government as being operated by “a secret
band of robbers and murderers.” This statement is inherently true of all governments, for they rob
collectively through taxation and they murder collectively through aggressive warfare. Despite the
fact that these are gross violations of the 6th and 8th commandments, the masses continue to
capitulate to the State’s antics because they feel that dissent would be unpatriotic. They forget
through all the jingoistic hype that government is not some abstract, big-brother-like, faceless entity,but is merely a small group of individuals who have managed to slip into positions of power. This
“secret band of robbers and murderers” hires intellectuals who spend more time studying
propaganda techniques than the average person spends learning to read. The result of such systems
is collective acquiescence to an official state agenda which usually enriches a few at the expense of
the many. The obedient masses are told that the State does these things for the “good and safety of
society.”
The Book of Mormon teaches the opposite view: that we are individuals, we act for ourselves, our
rights are granted by our Creator, true patriotism is obedience to God, that most men abuse power,
just wars are always defensive, preemptive wars are always initiated by ambitious men, armies should
be voluntary, war taxation is evil, collective hatred is of the devil, free trade leads to prosperity,
flattery (propaganda) is used to start wars, civilians are to be left alone during battle, and that the
word of God is more powerful than the sword. That the commandment to love God and our
neighbor transcends all nations, countries, cities, and states, and that God is not so much concerned
with imaginary lines defining countries as He is with how we treat our brothers and sisters —
encompassing all of mankind. This is the message I hope to portray in this book; one which liftsindividual liberty above the false “good” of collective acquiescence to any unrighteous government
action. This is a message reaching out to all people who inhabit this world, regardless of race,
religion, or nationality — admonishing all of us to love our enemies as well as our neighbors. A
message promulgated by the Savior Himself, which pleads with mankind to stop murdering and to
begin truly loving each-other instead.
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
16/286
Chapter One Notes and Sources
1. http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.htmlhttp://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.htmlhttp://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block26.html
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
17/286
Chapter 2
Principles of Defensive Warfare; America’s Two Just Wars
In memory of our God, our religion, and freedom, and our peace, our wives, and our children.-Captain Moroni
War is perhaps the most reprehensible atrocity ever perpetuated upon mankind. It encapsulates
all of the most egregious crimes, darkest horrors, unrestrained passions, and merciless tyrannies of
ambitious people. In the name of God, country, and patriotism conscripted armies have engaged in
the mass slaughter of men, women, and children while being convinced that the cause is just. The
purpose of this book is to debunk the romanticism surrounding the philosophy of aggressive
warfare, to set forth the Christian principles of defensive warfare as expounded in the Book of
Mormon , and to expose war for what it really is; mass murder on a grand scale. The reader should
keep in mind throughout this study that war has been primarily carried out by a small ruling
minority; worldly government. This entity uses the power of intellectuals to convince others to rally
behind a “just” cause by sending their children to die for the supposed liberty of other nations, or
“to protect our freedom” at home. If establishment intellectuals fail in their endeavors then the
power of conscription is invoked (as it was during the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam)
to coerce them into fighting. Such involuntary servitude is wrong, a violation of the Constitution,and a contradiction of the Lord's statement that, “it is not right that any man should be in bondage
one to another.”1
The reason why wars are perpetuated is explained to us through the scriptures in a warning
given by Joseph Smith, Jr., wherein he states; “it is the disposition of almost all men, as soon as they
get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous
dominion.”2 When one is placed at the head of government, it is almost universally inevitable that
they will exercise such compulsion on their people. The lust for power and gain can envelope those
in authority with an insatiable desire to exercise unrighteous dominion over nations, peoples, and
territories — leading to wars of expansionism and empire. Unfortunately, most wars are fought over
this very thing and yet so few are waged purely for the purpose of defense as was done by the
Christians recorded within the Book of Mormon — defensive warfare to “preserve their rights and their
privileges, yea, and also their liberty, that they might worship God according to their desires.”3
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
18/286
To help us avoid confusion and/or deception, the Lord has given us a standard for defensive
warfare in the Doctrine and Covenants, and an actual history of a war fought by the Nephites
against a dictatorial maniac named Amalickiah. When one considers these principles revealed to
Joseph Smith, Jr. and studies them with an open mind, it becomes evident that our own nation has
not followed the Lord's standard of defensive warfare and is in fact under condemnation for most
of the wars it has engaged in. These principles can be found in the 98th Section of the Doctrine and
Covenants and will be quoted at length here as follows:
Now I speak unto you concerning your families — if men will smite you, or
your families once, and ye bear it patiently and revile not against them, neither seek
revenge, ye shall be rewarded; But if ye bear it not patiently, it shall be accounted
unto you as being meted out as a just measure unto you. And again, if your enemy
shall smite you the second time, and you revile not against your enemy, and bear it
patiently, your reward shall be an hundredfold. And again, if he shall smite you the
third time, and ye bear it patiently, your reward shall be doubled unto you four-fold;
and these three testimonies shall stand against your enemy if he repent not, and shall
not be blotted out. And now, verily I say unto you, if that enemy shall escape my
vengeance, that he be not brought into judgment before me, then ye shall warn him
in my name, that he come no more upon you, neither upon your family, even your
children’s children unto the third and fourth generation. And then, if he shall come
upon you or your children, or your children’s children unto the third and fourth
generation, I have delivered thine enemy into thine hands. And if thou wilt spare
him, thou shalt be rewarded for thy righteousness; and also thy children and thy
children’s children unto the third and fourth generation. Nevertheless, thine enemy
is in thine hands; and if thou rewardest him according to his works thou art justified;
if he has sought thy life, and thy life is endangered by him, thine enemy is in thine
hands and thou art justified.
Author's interjection: The reader should be picking up the hint by now that war — to the Lord — is the
absolute last resort and should only be engaged in after bearing patiently three “smitings” from a potential
enemy. There also needs to be a clear and present danger, or as the Lord has stated it; if “thy life is
endangered . . . “ This is congruent with the ancient “ Just War” philosophy of the Romans (before they
became an aggressive empire) that war should only be engaged in if your home is being attacked. The
Nephites shared this philosophy as evidenced by the following statement that they were “taught… never to
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
19/286
give an offense, yea, and never to raise the sword except it were against an enemy, except it were to preserve
their lives.”4
Behold, this is the law I gave unto my servant Nephi, and thy fathers, Joseph,
and Jacob, and Isaac, and Abraham, and all mine ancient prophets and apostles.
And again, this is the law that I gave unto mine ancients, that they should not go out
unto battle against any nation, kindred, tongue, or people, save I, the Lord,
commanded them. And if any nation, tongue, or people should proclaim war against
them, they should first lift a standard of peace unto that people, nation, or tongue;
And if that people did not accept the offering of peace, neither the second nor the
third time, they should bring these testimonies before the Lord; Then I, the Lord,
would give unto them a commandment, and justify them in going out to battle
against that nation, tongue, or people. And I, the Lord, would fight their battles andtheir children’s battles, and their children’s children, until they had avenged
themselves on all their enemies, to the third and fourth generation. Behold, this is an
ensample unto all people, saith the Lord your God, for justification before me.5
So we learn from these verses that the Lord gave this law to his ancients and we have to assume
that this includes Moses and Joshua. However, we read in the Old Testament of Israelites destroying
entire civilizations — including women and children. Would the Lord contradict his own law? The
answer lies in the authenticity of the Biblical translation. We know the Book of Mormon to be the
pure translation of the Nephite record and there is not one single instance wherein the Lord
commands a Nephite prophet to annihilate an entire nation, or to even engage in a preemptive
attack on their enemies. During the righteous times, and specifically under Captain Moroni, the
Nephites waged only defensive war and were “compelled reluctantly to contend with their
brethren, the Lamanites.”6 They were also “sorry to take up arms against the Lamanites, because
they did not delight in the shedding of blood.7 When Captain Helaman asked the two-thousand
stripling warriors if they would battle against the Lamanites in order to help defend Antipus, they
replied —” we would not slay our brethren if they would let us alone.”8 As we shall see, Captain
Moroni was obedient to the principles outlined in D&C 98, and showed his faith in God by asking a
prophet to pray for guidance — for he, “knowing of the prophecies of Alma, sent certain men unto
him, desiring of him that he should inquire of the Lord whither the armies of the Nephites should
go to defend themselves against the Lamanites.”9
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
20/286
When this account is compared to the record of the Israelites, it is strikingly dissimilar. For
instance, in Numbers 31 the Lord supposedly commands Moses to send 12,000 warriors to destroy
the Midianites and burn all their cities. After this was done, they “took all the spoil, and all the prey,
both of men and of beasts.”10 As for the women and children Moses then commanded them to
“therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying
with him.”11 Here we have the Israelites committing an overt act of aggression against the
Midianites; burning their cities, taking the spoils, and killing men, women, and children. Is this not a
violation of the commandments “thou shalt not kill” and “thou shalt not steal?” There are several
accounts of this type of warfare in the Old Testament that have to do with the Israelite journey into
the Promised Land. It is this author’s opinion that one of the two following things is true; either
these accounts are mistranslations, or there were very special circumstances approved of by the Lord
which justified the Israelites in their actions. The former is more probable, but even if the latter were the case the Nephite example is the one that applies to America today. Christians (Mormon or
otherwise) who cite Israelite accounts as pretext or prescription for preemptively attacking any
foreign nation and/or conducting aggressive warfare are not justified.
Turning to the account of the Nephite war in the Book of Alma, we learn of the extenuating
circumstances which justified the Nephites in waging defensive war. The Zoramites and Amalekites
had dissented, or defected over to the Lamanites, and had come into the land of the Nephites to
wage war. Moroni — only 25 years old when given command of the Nephite army —”knew the
intention of the Lamanites, that it was their intention to destroy their brethren, or to subject them
and bring them into bondage that they might establish a kingdom unto themselves over all the
land.”12 Mormon, as he relates this history, explains that the Nephites were indeed following the
Lord’s rules:
Nevertheless, the Nephites were inspired by a better cause, for they were not
fighting for monarchy nor power but they were fighting for their homes and their
liberties, their wives and their children, and their all, yea, for their rites of worship
and their church. And they were doing that which they felt was the duty which they
owed to their God; for the Lord had said unto them, and also unto their fathers,
that: Inasmuch as ye are not guilty of the first offense, neither the second, ye shall
not suffer yourselves to be slain by the hands of your enemies. And again, the Lord
has said: Ye shall defend your families even unto bloodshed. Therefore for this
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
21/286
cause were the Nephites contending with the Lamanites, to defend themselves, and
their families, and their lands, their county, and their rights, and their religion13
It is important to note that the first and second offenses were committed by the Lamanites and
both preemptive attacks were facilitated by Nephite dissenters who were lusting for kingship and
power. The chief of these — Amlici — was after the order of the Nehors (meaning antichrist), and he
sought to establish himself as a king so he could destroy the religious freedom of the people. Just
four years prior, king Mosiah had established the reign of the judges, which resulted in a constitutional
republic much like the United States of America14. This system also resembled the ancient Israelite
system of judges that Moses and his father-in-law — Jethro — established prior to their entering the
land of Canaan15. Needless to say, the Nephite people weren’t going to let Amlici pull off a coup
after they had just been granted their political freedom. A vote was held through which “the voice
of the people came against Amlici, that he was not made a king over the people.”16 He then
proceeded to stir up the hearts of those who followed him and after they consecrated him to be
their king they took up arms against the people of Nephi. Alma, the chief judge and governor of
the people, went up at the head of the Nephite armies (true leadership behavior forsaken by modern
executives) as they defended themselves against the Amlicites. Thousands were slain on both sides,
and as the Amlicites retreated Alma sent spies to watch them. The next day they returned and
related the terrifying news that the Amlicites had joined with the Lamanites. Being greatly
outnumbered, the Nephites were assaulted by the Lamanites and Amlicites; however, “the Nephites
being strengthened by the hand of the Lord, having prayed mightily to him that he would deliver
them out of the hands of their enemies, therefore the Lord did hear their cries, and did strengthen
them, and the Lamanites and the Amlicites did fall before them.”17
Alma contends face to face with Amlici, slays him, and then subsequently contends with the
king of the Lamanites — forcing his retreat. In fact, the whole army of the Lamanites — exceedingly
more numerous than the Nephites —was defeated and driven back, fulfilling the Lord’s promises
that he would fight their battles for them if they followed His rules of warfare. The second offense
came when Zerahemnah came against the Nephites thirteen years later, with the intent “that he
might gain power over the Nephites by bringing them into bondage.”18 He was immediately
defeated, and even scalped by Moroni’s army and compelled to enter into a covenant of peace or be
destroyed19. The Lamanites returned to their own land and there was peace until Amalickiah
appeared on the scene. Amalickiah was a Nephite by birth who dissented just shortly after Helaman
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
22/286
established the church again following the wars and dissensions of the Lamanites. He was a cunning
man and used much flattery to convince those around him, especially the lower judges of the land,
that if they supported him in his quest for kingship then “he would make them rulers over the
people.”20 He drew many away from the church by his “flatteries,” leading them to “seek to destroy
the church of God, and to destroy the foundation of liberty which God had granted unto them.”21
He fled with his followers to the wilderness and when Moroni cut his men off, Amalickiah took a
small number who had not been captured and defected to the Lamanites. He used treachery and
murder to assassinate the king of the Lamanites in a classic coup d’etat, establishing himself as
dictator.22 He then launched a massive military campaign against the Nephites and swore to drink
the blood of Moroni. It was these precarious circumstances that compelled the Nephites to wage
defensive warfare against a sycophantic, megalomaniacal tyrant.
Glenn L Pearson and Reid E. Bankhead — two former BYU professors who wrote one of thebest Book of Mormon study guides in existence — have a section on defensive war. They document the
plain and precious clarity that the Book of Mormon lays down in regard to the causes of war and what
qualifies as righteous participation in them. They are the following:
1. It is the result of the wickedness of fallen men in a fallen world.
2. It always is started by the evil designs of power-hungry totalitarians.
3. Good men and good nations should never go to war except to defend their
liberty, their lives, their families, and their property.23
There is another condition that exists when it is morally justifiable to engage in war: the case of
secession from a mother state. The proper protocol here is to engage in civil disobedience or
intellectual dissonance when a central governing authority is destroying rights and to continue such
action until that authority relents or declares war on its subjects. According to the Lord’s counsel, we
are only required to obey the laws of governments that honor our inalienable rights. Joseph Smith, Jr.
declared the following :
We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective
governments in which they reside, while protected in their inherent and inalienable
rights by the laws of such governments…24
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
23/286
This counsel from Joseph Smith, Jr. implies that our obedience to government is conditional
upon how well that government protects our natural rights. If a state becomes rogue, violating its
bounds by attacking its citizens' basic rights of free speech, free press, freedom of religion,
economic freedom, et al , then the people of that state are justified in initiating a revolution. This is
acceptable to God because when government becomes tyrannical and begins to destroy individual
liberty then it interferes with God’s plan of free agency. As this is God’s work and glory, one can
understand the disdain the Creator has for governments that work to infringe upon individual
agency, which is God’s greatest gift to His children. Nephi, in the Book of Mormon, qualifies the
American Revolution by prophesying that the Lord would not only vindicate the colonists in their
secession from Britain, but that he would also help them win the war. This humble prophet — when
just a boy at sixteen years of age — saw this in the following vision:
And it came to pass that I beheld many multitudes of the Gentiles upon the
land of promise (America)… And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon
the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance . . . I,
Nephi, beheld that the Gentiles who had gone forth out of captivity did humble
themselves before the Lord; and the power of the Lord was with them. And I
beheld that their mother Gentiles were gathered together upon the waters, and upon
the land also, to battle against them. And I beheld that the power of God was with
them, and also that the wrath of God was upon all those that were gathered together
against them to battle. And I, Nephi, beheld that the Gentiles that had gone out of
captivity were delivered out of the hands of all other nations.25
Why did the British monarch King George III declare war on the colonies? It was because of
their civil disobedience and intolerance toward abuses from the king. Thomas Jefferson listed 27 of
these abuses in the Declaration of Independence. Some of the most invasive include: keeping
standing armies during peacetime, giving the military power over the civil power, forced quartering
of British troops while protecting them with mock trials in cases of murder, trade embargos,imposing taxes without consent, deprivation of trial by jury, suspending the legislatures of the state
governments, and sending “swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.”25
Much like the Nephites under the command of Alma, the colonists were greatly outnumbered and
outgunned by their British counterparts. However, unlike the British, their cause was just. They were
not fighting for monarchy, nor for power as the Lamanites had — they fought to preserve their
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
24/286
liberty, rights, lands, and families. It is evident that God preserved our forefathers during many of
the various battles of the Revolution. Just by examining the life of George Washington we find
extraordinary Divine Providence. When 23 years old, he survived two horses being shot out from
under him in one battle during the French and Indian War, which took place at Fort Duquesne near
Pittsburgh. He was also deathly ill during the melee and displayed unrelenting valor in rallying the
troops after General Braddock was fatally wounded. After retiring for the night, he found bullet
fragments in his coat and wig. About twenty years later, he would lead the colonial army to
eventually defeat the British, literally fulfilling the prophecy of Nephi. Henry B. Carrington — a
historian — documents twenty-two instances of divine intervention during the Revolutionary War.
He had this to say about the war in general:
The war for American independence was marked by many critical events,
which were beyond human control or remedy. Some of these changed the relations
of contending armies in a single night. More than once, a few hours of unexpected
rain, wind or fog, were enough to assure lasting results. These determining events,
because belonging to the sphere and operation of physical laws, are not beyond the
recognition of nature’s Master. They testify very clearly at least, the absolute
uncertainty of the best human plans, whether for peace or war, and the value of the
promptness, which seizes every opportunity as it passes, and thus gives shape to the
material issues, which are ripe for solution.26
The Book of Mormon was written for our day. We can draw comparisons between the types of
wars waged during those times and those we have in the present. What may come as a shock to
many Christians, Latter-day Saints, and Americans in general is that only two of America’s wars have
been constitutional, moral, and justified from a Book of Mormon perspective. We have just discussed
the first of these, and the second is the subject of much controversy and debate. It is the Civil War,
and our contention here is that only the Southern position was justified. The notion of a civil war
implies that both sides are struggling for power, but in the American case it was a war of secession . Wehave already established that the American Revolution was also a war of secession from England.
Murray Rothbard — one of the most influential libertarain thinkers of the 20th Century — explains
the similarities between the two wars as follows:
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
25/286
In 1861, the Southern states, believing correctly that their cherished institutions
were under grave threat and assault from the federal government, decided to
exercise their natural, contractual, and constitutional right to withdraw, to “secede”
from that Union. The separate Southern states then exercised their contractual right
as sovereign republics to come together in another confederation, the Confederate
States of America. If the American Revolutionary War was just, then it follows as
the night the day that the Southern cause, the War for Southern Independence, was
just, and for the same reason: casting off the “political bonds” that connected the
two peoples. In neither case was this decision made for “light or transient causes.”
And in both cases, the courageous seceders pledged to each-other “their lives, their
fortunes, and their sacred honor.27
This, of course, is not the history that is preached from the pulpits of public schools — because,unfortunately, the winners of wars always get to write the history and establishment historians would
have us believe that the war was fought over slavery and saving the so-called “Union”— whatever
that is. Our goal here is simply to tell the truth, and there is much more to this story than most
Americans have been taught. Our story begins in South Carolina in the year 1828. In this year, a
tariff — which Southerners called the Tariff of Abominations — was passed in the legislature, raising
the tariff rate substantially. This tariff was targeted at European goods that were being imported
into the South. The Southern economy was mostly agrarian which meant that Southerner’s had to
purchase industrial goods from either Northern or European sources. Up until that time, the goods
coming from Europe were cheaper than those coming from Northern industry. This tariff forced
the South into an ultimatum; either pay a high tax on imported goods or pay a high price for
Northern goods. The South viewed this tariff for what it really was — legalized plunder that led to
the rebellion of South Carolina and the idea of nullification (a state’s right to nullify federal laws
deemed unconstitutional). John C. Calhoun — vice-president under Andrew Jackson during the
1830s — strongly opposed the tariff and eventually resigned over it. South Carolina endeavored to
nullify the tariff legislation and was able to negotiate a reduction in the rate. However, the damage toSouthern prosperity sowed the seeds of eventual secession.
Abraham Lincoln came onto the scene in 1861. He was a proponent of three things that tear at
the root of individual freedom; large public works projects (such as subsidized railroads), a national
bank, and a high protective tariff.28 Lincoln was a Republican who supported protectionism , which is
another name for corporate welfare for big business. He was of a type of person like Alexander
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
26/286
Hamilton or Henry Clay, who championed the archaic economic system of British mercantilism.
Edgar Lee Masters — a famous playwright who wrote one of the first books criticizing Lincoln —
gives a telling definition of mercantilism:
Henry Clay was the champion of that political system, which doles favors to
the strong in order to win and to keep their adherence to the government. His
system offered shelter to devious schemes and corrupt enterprises. He was the
beloved son of Alexander Hamilton with his corrupt funding schemes, his
superstitions concerning the advantage of a public debt, and a people taxed to make
profits for enterprises that cannot stand alone. His example and his doctrines led to
the creation of a party that had no platform to announce because its principles were
plunder and nothing else.29
The tariff imposed upon the South by Lincoln and the Republican Party was a mercantilist
policy which benefitted Northern industry at the expense of the Southern economy. This was only a
scheme for government to abolish competition by fiat and which destroyed the idea (found within
the Book of Mormon ) that “every man should have an equal chance throughout all the land.”30 Not
only was Lincoln in full support of the tariff, he was willing to use violence to enforce it. He also
plainly articulated the fact that slavery was something he did not care to meddle with. Quoting from
his first inaugural address we read:
I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of
slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I
have no inclination to do so.31
He also made a direct verbal threat of violence to those Southern states that refused to pay the
tariff :
In doing this (defending the Union) there needs to be no bloodshed or
violence; and there shall be none, unless it be forced upon the national authority.
The power confided to me, will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property,
and places belonging to the government, and to collect the duties and imposts; but
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
27/286
beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion — no
using of force against, or among the people anywhere.32
The duties and imposts mentioned here are another name for excise taxes, or tariffs. What
Lincoln is essentially saying is that if the Southern states paid the tariff then there would be no
invasion or use of force. This was a direct threat of aggression against states that would not comply
with an unjust tax. How ironic that those who protested King George during the Boston Tea Party
are heralded by historians, yet Southerners who displayed patriotic valor in doing virtually the same
thing are not even mentioned in the history books except as despicable slave owners. Can it not be
said that the people of the Southern states were just as heroic in their endeavors to stand up to the
Republican Party and its high protective tariff ? Another point that should be examined is Lincoln’s
definition of the so-called Union. He made the outrageous and nonsensical claim that the Union
was older than the Constitution, and therefore that the states were subject to it. Quoting again from
his first inaugural address:
Descending from these general principles, we find the proposition that, in legal
contemplation, the Union is perpetual, confirmed by the history of the Union itself.
The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed in fact, by the
Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of
Independence in 1776. It was further matured and the faith of all the then thirteenStates expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of
Confederation in 1778. And finally, in 1787, one of the declared objects for
ordaining and establishing the Constitution, was “to form a more perfect union….It
follows from these views that no State, upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get
out of the Union, — that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void; and
that acts of violence, within any State or States, against the authority of the United
States, are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances.33
In reality, there is no such thing as this perpetua l Union referred to by Lincoln. This loaded term
signifies a geographical abstraction that only exists as a perception of a collective people or society.
However, to the founding generation this rationale would be a heresy, for they viewed the United
States as not one people, but as diversified individuals of thirteen independent states. If one studies
the original meaning of how the Framer’s viewed the Union and Constitution, one can discern the
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
28/286
inherent fraud associated with such a claim. To Lincoln, the Union was only a means to an end, and
that end was the confiscation of Southern wealth through taxation. His assertion that the Union is
older than the Constitution is mythical nonsense and blather. The truth is that, prior to the
ratification of the Constitution, the thirteen colonies were laying tariffs on goods crossing state lines,
requiring travelers to go through customs, and inflating their own separate currencies. The colonies
were anything but unified, but rather were acting like thirteen independent sovereign nations. Also,
his claim that “no state … can lawfully get out of the Union” has no validity according to how the
people viewed the Constitution at that time. In fact, the thirteen colonies came together voluntarily
and formed a compact, which is tantamount to a contract entered into by several parties working
toward a common goal. The states came together and delegated certain powers to the federal
government, but they did not cede any powers. The absolute power was retained by the people, not
the whole people, but the individual people of the sovereign states. St. George Tucker, one of thefirst scholars to write a commentary on the Constitution, reflects the general sentiment at the time in
his Views of the Constitution of the United States:
…It is a compact by which the federal government is bound to the several
states, and to every citizen of the United States. Although the federal government
can, in no possible view, be considered as a party to the compact made anterior to
its existence, and by which it was, in fact, created; yet as the creature of that
compact, it must be bound by it, to its creators, the several states in the union, andthe citizens thereof. Having no existence but under the constitution, nor any rights,
but such as that instrument confers; and those very rights being in fact duties; it can
possess no legitimate power, but such as is absolutely necessary for the performance
of a duty, prescribed and enjoined by the constitution. Its duties, then, become the
exact measure of its powers; and wherever it exerts a power for any other purpose,
than the performance of a duty prescribed by the constitution, it transgresses its
proper limits, and violates the public trust.34
It was also understood, and reiterated by Jefferson and Madison’s Virginia and Kentucky
Resolutions, that a state could voluntarily and peacefully leave the Union (terminate the contract) at
any time if the federal government passed unconstitutional laws. At the very least they could nullify
such laws, as South Carolina attempted to do in 1832, and if further aggression was used it was
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
29/286
universally understood that states could peacefully secede. Quoting from the Kentucky Resolutions
we read:
Resolved, that the several States composing the United States of America, are
not united on the principles of unlimited submission to their General Government;
but that by compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States
and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special
purposes, delegated to that Government certain definite powers, reserving each
State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self Government; and that
whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are
unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each state acceded as a
state, and is an integral party; that the Government created by this compact was not
made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself;
since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of
its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no
common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions
as of the mode and measure of redress.35
This language is congruent with that of the Declaration of Independence, wherein Jefferson
stated, “ That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (securing
rights), it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute New Government…”36 The
people of the South had every right not to be taxed without representation and to stand up to
federal tyranny. The tariff was nothing but a redistribution scheme that transferred wealth from
Southern agrarians to Northern merchants while enriching the pockets of men like Lincoln who
were the beneficiaries of lobbyists. The institution of slavery, however, was an inimical practice and
needed to be abolished, but why did it take a war costing over 600,000 American lives to do so? The
interesting thing about slavery is that in several European countries the practice was slowly phased
out peacefully. In fact, the United States is the only country that fought a war during that epoch over
what most participants thought was the issue of slavery. When the facts are examined it becomes
evident that pecuniary factors were at the root of the war, and that slavery was used as a veneer to
gain support from the opposing Northern public. Joseph Smith, Jr. ran for U.S. president in 1844
just shortly before his martyrdom and he had a plan to end slavery peacefully by selling territories
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
30/286
and purchasing the freedom of slaves, which was something that had been done in other nations. He
said:
Petition, also, ye goodly inhabitants of the slave states, your legislators to
abolish slavery by the year 1850, or now, and save the abolitionist from reproach
and ruin, infamy and shame. Pray Congress to pay every man a reasonable price for
his slaves out of the surplus revenue arising from the sale of public lands, and from
the deduction of pay from the members of Congress.37
In addition to the Civil War being an act of aggression on the part of the North, Lincoln
assumed dictatorial power not granted to federal government by the Constitution. Illegitimate
powers grabbed by the executive are an ominous threat to liberty — especially during times of war.
Most historians agree that Lincoln violated Constitutional limits, while at the same time honoring
him as a “benevolent dictator.” This myth has been dispelled by revisionist historian Thomas J.
DiLorenzo, who chronicles the abuses of Lincoln as follows:
Even though the large majority of Americans, North and South, believed in a
right of secession as of 1861, upon taking office, Lincoln implemented a series of
unconstitutional acts, including launching an invasion of the South without
consulting Congress, as required by the Constitution; declaring martial law;
blockading the Southern ports; suspending the writ of habeas corpus for the
duration of his administration; imprisoning without trial thousands of Northern
citizens; arresting and imprisoning newspaper publishers who were critical of him;
censoring all telegraph communication; nationalizing the railroads; creating several
new states without the consent of the citizens of those states; ordering Federal
troops to interfere with elections in the North by intimidating Democratic voters;
deporting a member of Congress, Clement L. Vallandigham of Ohio, for criticizing
the administration’s income tax proposal at a Democratic Party rally; confiscating
private property; confiscating firearms in violation of the Second Amendment; and
effectively gutting the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution, among
other things.38
It is also important to remember — especially by Latter-day Saints — that the Lord approved the
Constitution in a revelation given to Joseph Smith, Jr. In this revelation, the Lord specifically
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
31/286
declared the He justified the brethren in “befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the
land; And as pertaining to the law of man, whatsoever is more or less cometh of evil.”39 It therefore
logically follows that Lincoln was out of line with the Lord’s standard when he walked all over civil
liberties and Constitutional Rule of Law during the Civil War era. A war that was declared without
Congressional approval, something unprecedented up until Lincoln's time, but widely accepted
today as normal. More on Lincoln will be covered in subsequent chapters with regard to his
cornering the South into firing the first shot and the uncivilized and brutal warfare carried out by
Northern generals on Southern civilians.
Conclusion
In summation, we have established the Lord’s standard for defensiv e war. We have learned
through the example of the Nephites the precise conditions that need to exist before a just war canbe waged by a defending nation. We have also discussed the premise that America has engaged in
only two just wars since its inception and both have been wars of secession from a mother state,
which usurped authority. It is also appropriate to point out that the “dissenters” in the Book of
Mormon such as Amlici and Amalickiah desired to establish dictatorial regimes to overthrow the
freedom of the Nephites. The American “dissenters” during the Revolutionary and Civil War — or
more aptly named the War for Southern Independence — only desired to be left alone, and were therefore
justified in their collective actions of defiance against a corrupt central government. It is important
to distinguish between the two. The focus of our next chapter will be the conditions wherein waging
war is not justified and instead is sinful 'aggressive warfare'.
Chapter Two Notes and Sources
1. D&C 101:79
2. D&C 121:39, Emphasis added.
3. Alma 43:9
4. Alma 48:14
5. D&C 98:23-38
6. Alma 48:21
7. Alma 48:23
8. Alma, 56:46
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
32/286
9. Alma, 43:23
10. Numbers 31:11
11. Numbers 31:17
12. Alma 43:29
13. Alma 43:45-47
14. See Mosiah 29
15. The Nephite and Israelite system of judges constitutes the Lord’s ancient law of liberty. This law greatly
reduces the power of central governments and gives more self-governing power to localities. The American system of
states’ rights is based on this same principle and Thomas Jefferson actually studied the Biblical account of the Israelites
prior to the ratification of the Constitution. For a detailed study of the law of liberty see Cleon W. Skousen, The Majesty of
God’s Law .
16. Alma 2:7
17. Alma 2:28
18. Alma 43:8
19. Quite a difference from our modern day warfare where POWs are often tortured, executed, or incarcerated in
a concentration camp for years.
20. Alma 46:5
21. Alma 46:10, Emphasis added
22. Details on how Amalickiah orchestrated this regime change will discussed in a later chapter entitled, Amalickiah
and False Flag Operations
23. Glenn L. Pearson and Reid E. Bankhead, Building Faith With the Book of Mormon, copyright @ Joseph
Educational Foundation, 1994 Provo, UT, p. 112 Emphasis added.
24. D&C 134:5
25. 1 Nephi 13:14-19
26. Thomas Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence, In Congress July 4, 1776
27. Col. Henry B. Carrington , Battles of the American Revolution , p. 39
28. An essay by Murray N. Rothbard, America’s Two Just Wa rs: 1776 and 1861, Mises Institute, 1994
29. “I presume you all know who I am. I am humble Abraham Lincoln. I have been solicited by many friends to
become a candidate for the legislature. My politics are short and sweet, like the old woman’s dance. I am in favor of a
national bank… in favor of the internal improvements system and a high protective tariff.” -Abraham Lincoln, 1832, The
Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Quoted in Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Abraham Lincoln and the Triumph of Mercantili sm. An
essay in Reassessing the Presidency, The Rise of the Executive State and the Delcline of Freedom, Edited by John V. Denson, Mises
Institute, 2001, p. 203
30. Edgar Lee Masters, Lincoln the Man, p. 27
31. Mosiah 29:38
32. Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, Monday, March 4, 1861
33. Ibid, Emphasis Added.
34. Ibid
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
33/286
35. St. George Tucker, View of the Constitution of the United States With Selected Writings , 1999, by Liberty Fund, Inc.
pp. 120-121
36. Thomas Jefferson, The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 30: 1 January 1798
to 31 January 1799, Princeton University Press, 2003, pp. 529,56
37. Thomas Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence, In Congress, July 4, 1776
38. Joseph Smith, General Smith’s Views of the Pow ers and Policy of the Government of the United States , Nauvoo, Illinois,
Printed by John Taylor, 1844
39. Thomas J. DiLorenzo, The Real Lincoln, e-book pp. 145-46
40. D&C Section 98:6-7, See Also Section 101:77-80
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
34/286
Chapter 3
Wars of Aggression are Revolts Against Christ
Blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.-Jesus Christ
When a nation launches an attack on another by military invasion, remote bombing, or naval
blockades, this constitutes a preemptive strike or attack, and is aggressive warfare. Taking it a step
further, we can deduce that even trade embargos and economic sanctions are acts of war because
they result in harm to innocent people who happen to be part of a particular state. The Book of
Mormon is very explicit in drawing the lines between defensive and preemptive attacks and gives
plenty of examples of each. As established before, during the righteous times of the Nephites under
Alma, Captain Moroni, and his son Moronihah, they only engaged in defensive war to stave off
attacks against their liberty. As the account progresses through Helaman and as the Nephites
become subject to a government controlled by secret combinations, the people devolve toward a
more aggressive foreign policy. We can find corollaries with the Book of Mormon account and our
own modern devolution toward an interventionist foreign policy, beginning when the Monroe
Doctrine of isolationism began to be subverted toward the end of the 1800s with the advent of the
Spanish-American War.
In the third chapter of 3 Nephi , we read an account of an epistle written to Lachoneus — theNephite governor — from Giddianhi — leader of the Gadianton robbers. In this epistle Giddianhi
made a direct threat of violence against the Nephites as follows:
Therefore I write unto you, desiring that ye would yield up unto this my
people, your cities, your lands, and your possessions, rather than that they should
visit you with the sword and that destruction should come upon you. Or, in other
words, yield yourselves up unto us, and unite with us and become acquainted with
our secret works, and become our brethren that ye may be like unto us — not ourslaves, but our brethren and partners of all our substance.1 And behold, I swear
unto you, if ye will do this, with an oath, ye shall not be destroyed; but if ye will not
do this, I swear unto you with an oath, that on the morrow month I will command
that my armies shall come down against you, and they shall not stay their hand and
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
35/286
shall spare not, but shall slay you, and shall let fall the sword upon you even until ye
shall become extinct.2
There is no question or doubt that these Gadiantons were a clear and present danger to the
Nephites, and according to our modern standards it seems that a preemptive attack on the robbers
would have been justified to avoid being exterminated. However, as we read further into the chapter
we find that this is not the case. Although Lachoneus was the chief governor of the land, a man
named Gidgiddoni was a prophet and the chief captain of the armies of the Nephites, as it was their
custom to appoint a person who “had the spirit of revelation”3 to this position. The people,
apparently a little misled, said this unto the prophet Gidgiddoni:
Pray unto the Lord, and let us go up upon the mountains and into the
wilderness, that we may fall upon the robbers and destroy them in their own lands.
But Gidgiddoni saith unto them: The Lord forbid; for if we should go up against
them the Lord would deliver us into their hands; therefore we will prepare ourselves
in the center of our lands, and we will gather all our armies together, and we will not
go against them, but we will wait till they shall come against us; therefore as the
Lord liveth, if we do this he will deliver them into our hands.4
We can see here that the Lord’s standard of defensive war is holding true. True followers of
Christ do not engage in preemptive attacks even if their enemies are planning a potential strike, or as
in the above case, an imminent one. Instead of attacking the robbers in their own lands, which were
in the wilderness, the people followed the counsel of the chief governor and:
They did fortify themselves against their enemies, and they did dwell in one
land, and in one body, and they did fear the words which had been spoken by
Lachoneus, insomuch that they did repent of all their sins; and they did put up their
prayers unto the Lord their God, that he would deliver them in the time that their
enemies should come down against them to battle.5
It is interesting that the people had to repent and one has to ask just what did they have to
repent for? Perhaps they were repenting for their inclination toward preemptive war in asking the
prophet to pray to the Lord for permission to preemptively strike their enemies. Perhaps they should
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
36/286
have instead said to Gidgiddoni, “pray unto the Lord and ask him what we shall do to defend
ourselves.” Fortunately, the Nephites did repent and when the robbers came the next month they
were beaten and driven back into their own lands. What do we learn from this example? That true
Christians do not under any circumstances engage in preemptive war, and that even if there is an
imminent threat from an enemy then Christian protocol is to fortify the homeland and to prepare for
the time of attack. This is also evident from the example of Captain Moroni who was constantly
fortifying Nephite cities during their wars with the Lamanites.
Our next example comes in the third chapter of Mormon . Here, Mormon is describing the
military history of his people during a time of great wickedness. Mormon was the military
commander and also a prophet after the pattern of Gidgiddoni. When the Lord commands him to
cry repentance to the people he laments that, “it was in vain; and they did not realize that it was the
Lord that had spared them, and granted them a chance for repentance.”6
The next verse tells us thatthe king of the Lamanites sent Mormon an epistle declaring that the Lamanites were preparing to
come against them to battle. In the tradition of Gidgiddoni, Mormon gathered his people together
into one body in the land of Desolation (within Nephite borders). He says that “there [Desolation]
we did place our armies, that we might stop the armies of the Lamanites, that they might not get
possession of any of our lands; therefore we did fortify against them will all our force.”7
The account then tells us that the Lamanites brought battle to the Nephites for two consecutive
years and were defeated both times by Mormon’s people. It is at this point that the Nephite people
begin to become prideful — boasting in their own strength and swearing vengeance upon their
enemies. Mormon relates:
And now, because of this great thing which my people had done, they began to
boast in their own strength, and began to swear before the heavens that they would
avenge themselves of the blood of their brethren who had been slain by their
enemies. And they did swear by the heavens, and also by the throne of God, that
they would go up to battle against their enemies, and would cut them off from the
face of the land. And it came to pass that I, Mormon, did utterly refuse from this
time forth to be a commander and a leader of this people, because of their
wickedness and abominations.”8
We see here that Mormon refused to lead his people in aggressive rather than defensive warfare
against the Lamanites. While many may deride him as a pacifist it is evident that Mormon
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
37/286
understood the Lord’s rules of defensive warfare. He admits that he had led his people to battle
many times despite their wickedness, had loved them, and had prayed for them. Three times he had
“delivered them out of the hands of their enemies, and they repented not of their sins.”9 The next
few verses reveal that the Lord takes the business of vengeance seriously:
And when they had sworn by all that had been forbidden them by our Lord
and Savior Jesus Christ, that they would go up unto their enemies to battle, and
avenge themselves of the blood of their brethren, behold the voice of the Lord
came unto me, saying: Vengeance is mine, and I will repay; and because this people
repented not after I had delivered them, behold, they shall be cut off from the face
of the earth.”10
The key to true defensive war doctrine lies in the principle teaching that vengeance belongs only
to the Lord. The Lord has said that we are commanded to forgive all men but He will forgive whom
He will forgive. We have no business making a judgment call on who should live and who should
die. In the author’s opinion, the Lord’s standard of condemning preemptive war is twofold;
vengeance belongs only to the Lord and there is always collateral damage in the form of innocents.
When Truman dropped the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, some 200,000 innocent Japanese
civilians died — including thirty schools full of children. In 1991, the UN sanctions on Iraq
prohibited medical supplies from entering the country resulting in the deaths of 500,000 children.Hundreds of thousands of civilians died in WWII as a result of allied bombings and 750,000
Germans starved to death during WWI because of Churchill’s hunger blockade. Millions more died
in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan as a result of American intervention to annihilate the
“commi’s” and “terrorists” from the face of the earth. How are we any different than these
Nephites who Mormon refused to command? The plain truth is that we are not different, and if we
do not repent then we may meet the same fate as the Nephites and Jaredites whose failures to learn
the lessons of history are compiled in a record that is warning us from the dust. Mormon continues:
And it came to pass that I utterly refused to go up against mine enemies; and I
did even as the Lord commanded me; and I did stand as an idle witness to manifest
unto the world the things which I saw and heard, according to the manifestations of
the Spirit which had testified of things to come.”11
-
8/15/2019 War: A Book of Mormon Perspective
38/286
Mormon was keeping the commandments of God by not leading his men in an assault against
the Lamanites in their own lands. He was standing as an “idle witness” or an anti-war protestor as a
testimony against his people. Not surprisingly, we learn