Wang YuQingLiu ZihaoTran Quoc Cuong

Testing Plan for Bellews Game – Year of Eden

School of Business and Information ManagementOulu University of Applied Sciences

Wang YuQingk0wayu01@students.oamk.fi

Liu Zihao k0lizi00@students.oamk.fi

Cuong Quoc Trank0trqu00@students.oamk.fi

TEAM MEMBERS DESCRIBE THE CASE GENERALLYWhat are you testing?Year of EdenFor whom are you testing?BelleViews

School of Business and Information ManagementOulu University of Applied Sciences

1. General playability2. First impression 3. Graphic and sounds4. Bugs5. User interface usability6. Satisfaction

FOCUS TEST PERSONS• 15 people• 8 female, 7 male• Students (it, ib, architech, financial)

School of Business and Information ManagementOulu University of Applied Sciences

• In 5 minutes, user will be asked to completed one task which is given(included the instructions) they are asked to do one task(e.g. create a new player, find and build one building which is mentioned in the instruction)

TEST PROTOCOL• There is no question before test• After testing users will be asked to fill in a questionnaire about somecriterias such as: graphic, first impression,satisfaction…• Collecting the feedback from users

School of Business and Information ManagementOulu University of Applied Sciences

Questionair form for interview, intrustion, slide to introduction this game

• YuQing: talking with user, organize testing timetable, giving the instruction

• Zihao: write the report, collection information.

• Tran: prepare the material, summary result.

TEAM MEMBER’S ROLE

•Zihao’s home•Cafeteria in University of Oulu•17 September 2011

TIME AND PLACE

School of Business and Information ManagementOulu University of Applied Sciences

• There are15 testers included 8 females and 7 males.• The test group has 9 persons whose age are between 20-30 years old, 3 persons under 20 and 3 persons above 30. • The nationality contains Vietnamese, Chinese and Finnish.•Occupation: They are all students in different field such as: BIT, IB, Financial, Architecture and IT.

DEMOGRAPHIC

STT Name Age Gender Occupation Nationality

1 Hang Thi Thu Nguyen 26 F IB VN

2 Tran Xuan Bao 33 M IT Fin

3 Nguyen Thi Doan Trang 20 F IB VN

4 Pham Xuan Thao 30 M Architecture VN

5 Nguyen Ho Van Anh 20 F IB VN

6 Pham Thi Ly 24 F Finance VN

7 Nguyen Bao Ngoc 19 F IB VN

8 Yueqiang Xu 28 M IB CH

9 Phuong Thi Thu Bui 33 F IB VN

10 Zhang 23 M IB CH

11 Yang 24 F BIT CH

12 Wang 19 M BIT CH

13 Liu 19 M BIT CH

14 Li 28 F IB CH

15 Zihao 33 M BIT CH

TEST RESULT

STT Questionnaire Result

1 Have you ever try a game in facebook? 12/15

2 How long do you want to spend for playing Facebook game (hour/day)

3 persons: 1 hours5 persons: 30 minutes4 persons: 10 minutes3 persons: don’t play

3 How about the first impression of this game?

3 persons: Similar to Real-time Strategy Games.3 persons: Excited4 persons: Boring3 persons: Complicated2 persons: no feeling.

4 General playability (1 - 5)8 persons: 4 5 persons: 32 persons: 1

5 Graphic (1 - 5)4 persons: 53 persons: 47 persons: 31 persons: 1

STT Questionnaire Result

6 Sound3 persons: 510 persons: 32 persons: 2

7 Bug No

8 What are the good points of this game?

•Graphic is greats• Sound is attractive•Background story looks interesting•Bubble game

9 What are the disadvantage of this game?

•Various function of the buildings make the game more complex and challenging than may generic games on FB.•Didn't see the element of social interaction; Many similar PC games are available with high quality 3D graphic. This game the graphic is relatively poorer than other similar •The game looks simple•Not attractive at the first impression.•Quite complicated , quite hard to follow•It is not interaction game

STT Questionnaire Result

10 What should improve?

•Should have the social element, for example supporting multiplayer task, since FB is a place for socializing. •Graphic should be more attractive and description should be more simple•Sound is little dull• Interaction game•Music, color, sound and interface•Boring, it should be more difficult and attractive.

11 Do you want to play it again in next version? 10

TEST SESSION Who participated in the session?

Our group and the testing people.

Main findingsWe found some tester’s result about the general playability, graphic, sound, also some advantages, some disadvantages and what kind of things should improve in this game.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Positive feedback / strong points

1. Graphic is great and suitable for the game theme.

2. Sound is attractive 3. Background story looks interesting,

testers all like it.4. This game have a great idea.

Areas of improvement/negative feedback

1. Didn't see the element of social interaction; Many similar PC games are available with high quality 3D graphic. This game the graphic is relatively poorer than other similar

2. Various function of the buildings make the game more complex and challenging than may generic games on FB.

3. Some testers’ says the game first impression was not attractive.

4. Some testers’ says game is complicated and hard to follow the instruction.

5. It should be more interaction.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

CONCLUTION

GOOD POINT:

1. Game background story looks very interesting, this can make users pay attention to the game.

2. Game sound is suitable.3. Most of tester like graphic.4. Game idea is good.

BAD POINT:

1. Interface looks not so good, users cannot change anything about the background music and also the graphic effects.

2. Game general playability is not very good. Some testers said this game was boring and complicated, do not know what they should do in the game.

CONCLUTION

WHAT SHOULD IMPROVE:

CONCLUTION

1. Graphic should be more attractive and description should be more simple

2. Instruction is so long, it is good to be a bit brief.3. Sound is little dull and simplex, if there are many

different sound and music in the game, it will make this game more interactive.

4. Should have the social element, for example supporting multiplayer task, since FB is a place for socializing.

THANK YOU

School of Business and Information ManagementOulu University of Applied Sciences