wage and hour issues part 1 presented by: todd m. …...wage and hour litigation trends average...
TRANSCRIPT
WAGE AND HOUR ISSUES – PART 1
PRESENTED BY: TODD M. ROBBINS, PARTNER
ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO
The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect those of CASBO.
Agenda: PART 1
Introduction
Minimum Wage Increases
Overview of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”)
California Exemptions
The Key Differences Between California & Federal Guidelines
DOL Audits
Wage and Hour Litigation TrendsAverage workweek for full-time adults in U.S. is now 47 hours
50% of full-time employees say they work more than 40 hours per week
Hours Percentage
60+ 18%
50-59 21%
41-49 11%
40 42%
Less than 40 8%
Source : Gallup data from 2013-2014 Work and Education Polls
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends
• Salaried workers work longer hours
• Hourly workers still average over 40 per week
Hours Paid Salary Paid Hourly
60+ 25% 9%
50-59 25% 17%
41-49 9% 12%
40 37% 56%
Less than 40 3% 8%
Source : Gallup data from 2013-2014 Work and Education Polls
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• Increase in technological capabilities
– 9-5 workday is becoming 24/7
– Higher demands on responsiveness, shorter turnaround times
– More telecommuting, remote work
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• Workplace flexibility
– 67% of HR professionals think EEs have a balanced work-life—45% of employees don’t
– 64% of managers expect employees to be reachable outside of the office on personal time
Source: Gallup Business Journal, Dec 18, 2012
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• Workplace flexibility
– Gallup study on employee well-being:
• Engagement > more time off
• Flextime > more vacation, paid time off
• Flexibility = strongest factor in overall well-being
Source: Gallup Business Journal, Dec 18, 2012
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• Corresponding focus of DOL and plaintiffs’ bar:
– Misclassification claims (e.g., independent contractor)
– Off-the-clock and overtime work
• Telecommuting, donning and doffing
– Travel time and expense reimbursement
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends
35174
36352
39240
37825 38094
35838
31012
33090
31102
32950
34689 34875
36416
3330932504
33603
27500
30000
32500
35000
37500
40000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Employment Litigation Nationwide
Source : Civil Cases Filed, by Nature of Suit report from www.uscourts.gov
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends
21032 21157 2095520507
19746
17516
14353 14416 1431415231
1606516909 16976
15266
1383114281
10000
12500
15000
17500
20000
22500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Discrimination Case Filings Nationwide
Source : Civil Cases Filed, by Nature of Suit report from www.uscourts.gov
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends
1935 1960
3904
2751
36174039 4207
7310
53936073
68256335
81527500
81608781
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Wage and Hour Case Filings Nationwide
Source : Civil Cases Filed, by Nature of Suit report from www.uscourts.gov
Wage and Hour Litigation TrendsYear Empl Cases Wage/Hr Cases % of Total
2010 34,689 6,825 19.7%
2011 34,875 6,335 18.1%
2012 36,416 8,152 22.4%
2013 33,309 7,500 22.5%
2014 32,504 8,160 25.1%
2015 33,603 8,781 26.1%
Source : Civil Cases Filed, by Nature of Suit report from www.uscourts.gov
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• DOL Wage and Hour Division budget increased 33.6% since 2007:
Year Appropriations to WHD
2007 $170,220,000
2009 $193,092,000
2011 $227,491,000
2013 $215,184,000
2015 $227,500,000
Requested for 2017 $276,599,000
Source : FY2017 Congressional Budget Justification; U.S. DOL Wage and Hour Division
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• DOL-Timesheet App:
– EEs track hours and “determine wages owed”
– EEs can forward time records directly to WHD
Wage and Hour Litigation Trends• “Workers Owed Wages” website:
– “[W]orkers can look up in Spanish or English whether they are owed back wages.
– Recouped $1 million in back wages since 2015.
Wage and Hour Trivia
What is the minimum wage be in California effective January 1, 2017?◦ A. $9.50
◦ B. $10.00
◦ C. $10.50
◦ D. $12.00
California Minimum Wage Increases – Non-Exempt Employees:
Effective Date Non-Exempt Employees
Jan. 1, 2017 $10.50
Jan. 1, 2018 $11.00
Jan. 1, 2019 $12.00
Jan. 1, 2020 $13.00
Jan. 1, 2021 $14.00
Jan. 1, 2022 $15.00
California Minimum Wage Increases –Exempt Employees:
Effective Date Exempt Employees
Jan. 1, 2017 $43,680
Jan. 1, 2018 $45,760
Jan. 1, 2019 $49,920
Jan. 1, 2020 $54,080
Jan. 1, 2021 $58,240
Jan. 1, 2022 $62,400
Local Minimum Wage Ordinances
City/County Current Min. Wage Next Increase
Berkeley $11.00 10/1/16 - $12.53
El Cerrito $11.60 1/1/17 - $12.25
Long Beach Same as state 1/1/18 - $12.00
Los Angeles City $10.50 7/1/17 - $12.00
Los Angeles County (unincorporated areas)
$10.50 7/1/17 - $12.00
Malibu $10.50 7/1/17 - $12.00
Mountain View $11.00 1/1/17 - $13.00
Pasadena $10.50 7/1/17 - $12.00
Richmond $11.52 1/1/17 - $12.30
Sacramento Same as state 1/1/18 - $11.00
San Diego $10.50 1/1/17 - $11.50
San Francisco $13.00 7/1/17 - $14.00
Santa Monica $10.50 7/1/17 - $12.00
Sunnyvale $11.00 1/1/17 - $13.00
Overview of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Exemptions◦ Executive Exemptions
◦ Administrative Exemptions
◦ Professional Exemption
◦ Highly Compensated Exemption
2016 Increases in Federal Salary Basis Test
Nevada v. Department of Labor (2016 E.D. TX) 4:16-cv-00731
◦ Currently on appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
FLSAExempt Employees
To be exempt from overtime under the FLSA, the employee must meet:
The “salary basis” test and
The “duties test” ◦ Executive
◦ Administrative
◦ Professional
California Education Code requirements are similar but not identical.
FLSAExempt Employees
The “salary basis” test requires:
The employee regularly receives each pay period◦ A predetermined amount constituting all or part of his or her compensation
◦ That cannot be reduced because of variations in the quality and quantity of work. (29 C.F.R. § 541.602.)
FLSAExempt Employees
Executive: An executive employee’s primary duties typically include: selection, evaluation, and discipline of employees with regular direction over two (2) or more employees.
◦ Employee must earn a salary of at least $455 ($913 on 12/1/16) per week;
◦ Employee’s primary duty must be management of the enterprise or a department or subdivision; and
◦ Employee customarily and regularly directs the work of two (2) or more employees. (29 C.F.R. §541.100.)
FLSAExempt Employees
Administrative: An administrative employee’s primary duties typically include office or non-manual work that is directly related to the management policies or general business operations of the employer or its customers. The position must require the exercise of independent judgment and discretion.
◦ Employee earns a salary of at least $913 per week; and,
◦ Employee’s primary duty:
◦ Is office or non-manual work;
◦ Directly related to the employer’s management policies or the general business operations of the employer or its customers; and,
◦ Includes work requiring the exercise of discretion and independent judgment. (29 C.F.R. § 541.200.)
FLSAExempt Employees
Professional: A professional employee’s primary duties typically include work requiring advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning, involving the exercise of creative talent.
◦ Employee earns a salary of at least $913 per week; and,
◦ Employee’s primary duty is either:
◦ Work requiring advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course (as opposed to general academic education or apprenticeship) of specialized intellectual instruction; or,
◦ Teaching, tutoring, instructing, or lecturing if the employee is employed in such activities as a teacher in a school system or similar institution. (29 C.F.R. § 541.303.) The salary amount test does not apply to those covered by this section.
FLSAExempt Employees
Special Computer Employees Exemption:
◦ Special provision for some computer employees not otherwise professionally exempt. (29 U.S.C. §213(a)(17).)
◦ Applies to:◦ Systems analysts
◦ Programmers (who “write code”)
◦ Software engineers
◦ Workers who apply systems analysis techniques and procedures to determine hardware, software, or system functional specifications, or
◦ Workers who design, develop, test, or modify computer systems or programs based on user or design specifications
FLSAExempt Employees
Special Computer Employees Exemption:
◦ Need not be paid on a salary basis! May be paid:◦ At least $913 per week on a salary basis, or
◦ At least $27.63 per hour on an hourly basis.
◦ Does not include:
◦ Employees whose primary duties are manufacturing or repair of computer hardware, or
◦ Employees who are not primarily engaged in systems analysis, programming, or software engineering.
Overview of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Flores v. City of San Gabriel, 824 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. 2016)◦ “City's cash payments to police officers in lieu of medical
benefits under the city's flexible benefits plan were not excludable from the calculation of the officers' regular rate of pay for overtime purposes under the FLSA...”
Overtime: Calculating the “Regular Rate”
The “regular rate” is generally computed by dividing the employee’s total compensation in any workweek by the total hours actually worked in that workweek.
Examples of Compensation Included In Regular Rate:◦ Cash in lieu of benefits
◦ Longevity Pay
◦ Shift differential payments
◦ Coaching Stipend
Examples of Payments Excluded From Regular Rate:◦ Perfect attendance bonus (maybe)
◦ Expense reimbursements
Overtime: Calculating the “Regular Rate”
Example: Employee works 46 hours during the week, receives cash in lieu of benefits of $500 annually, and receives $15 per hour before any adjustment for the bonus.
His regular rate and overtime premium rate is calculated as follows:
Calculating the “Regular Rate”
Step 1 Multiply the total number of hours worked in the pay period by the straight hourly rate.
$15 x 46 hours = $690
Step 2 Add the weekly amount of the $500 cash in lieu payment ($9.62) to the amount calculated in Step 1.
$9.62 + $690 = $699.62
Step 3 Divide the amount calculated in Step 2 by the total number of hours worked in the pay period to determine the employee’s regular rate.
$699.62 ÷ 46 = $15.21 / per hour
Step 4 Multiply the regular rate calculated in Step 3 by 1.5 to determine the employee’s premium rate.
$15.21 x 1.5 = $22.82/ per hour
Salary Basis Test◦ Two times state minimum wage
California’s Exemptions
FLSA v. California Salary Level Test ** pending outcome of Nevada v. Department of Labor (2016 E.D. TX) 4:16-cv-00731
CALIFORNIA FLSA
December 1, 2016 $41,600 $47,476**
January 1, 2017 $43,680 $47,476**
January 1, 2018 $45,760 $47,476**
January 1, 2019 $49,920 $47,476**
January 1, 2020 $54,080 TBD
January 1, 2021 $58,240 TBD
January 1, 2022 $62,400 TBD
California’s Exemptions
Duties Test◦ Executive Exemption: A person employed in an executive capacity
◦ Administrative Exemption: A person employed in an administrative capacity
◦ Professional Exemption: A person employed in a professional capacity
The Key Differences Between California and Federal Guidelines
• Be engaged in work that is primarily (more than 50% of the time) intellectual, managerial, or creative, and that requires exercise of discretion and independent judgment. The federal duties test does not require exempt employees to spend more than 50% of their time performing exempt work.
• Receive a monthly salary equivalent to two times the state minimum wage.
The Key Differences Between California and Federal Guidelines
• Additionally, the professional exemption under California guidelines specifically includes employees who are:
◦ Licensed or certified by the State of California to practice law, medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, optometry, architecture, engineering, teaching, or accounting; or
◦ Engaged in commonly recognized learned or artistic professions.
Selected Issues Concerning Classification of Exempt Employees
Customarily and Regularly Exercises Discretion and Independent Judgment
•Determination of “Primary” Activity of Employee: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Test
•Education Code section 45130
◦ Supervisory, Administrative or executive
◦ Certified by the Governing Board in writing
Hypothetical #1: Classified Manager
Maintenance Crew Lead◦ Duties: Responsible for maintaining the school buildings and
grounds. Coordinates the work of three groundskeepers and makes recommendations for their terminations and promotions.
◦ Salary: $38,000
Hypothetical #2: Academic Administrator
Principal/Division Dean ◦ Duties: Assist in the management of instructional programs and
operations of the school site/division.
Salary: $125,000
Hypothetical #3: Psychologist
Psychologist ◦ Duties: Perform psycho-educational assessments to determine
appropriate programs and instructional processes to enable students to achieve maximum achievement and adjustment.
Salary: $95,000
Hypothetical #4: Executive Assistant
Executive Assistant to the Superintendent◦ Duties: Plan, coordinate and perform efficient, timely and highly complex advanced-level executive
assistant duties requiring independent judgment and analysis; perform substantive and procedural administrative work.
◦ Salary: $46,000
When the DOL Performs an Audit
A DOL audit can be triggered by a call or complaint from a single employee or other person.
The DOL can investigate by interviewing employees and reviewing payroll records.
Generally, a settlement can be reached with the employer agreeing to:◦ Provide back pay to employees who reasonably show they have been denied overtime
◦ Alter practices to avoid uncompensated regular or overtime work
◦ Adopt accurate recordkeeping practices
QuestionAnswer
For questions or comments, please contact:
Thank You
Todd M. Robbins(951) 683-1122
Disclaimer
This AALRR presentation is intended for informational purposes
only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a
particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles
discussed may differ substantially in individual situations.
Receipt of this or any other AALRR presentation/publication
does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not
responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the
publishing process.
© 2017 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo