@vssi(98-100)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 @VSSI(98-100)
1/32 n d Q u a r t e r 2 0 0 5
rticleA
98
Voluntary Separation SchemeAnd RetrenchmentBy Thomas Chow, Managing Director, Professional & Organisation Development Sdn. Bhd.
The current business slowdown in the construction industry
in Malaysia has come down rather hard on many
construction companies, particularly those that depend
substantially on Government projects. The Prime Minister, Dato
Seri Abdullah Hj Ahmad Badawi has summed this up very
succinctly in his press interview with The Star, after opening the
Malay Construction Entrepreneurs Convention 2005 on June 11,
2005, when he said: Contractors should face the stark reality that
the construction boom in the country is over. They have to look forother opportunities, including those overseas. It is very likely we will
not see another construction boom in the country. We have built
enough roads, hospitals and schools to last us a very long time .I
am not saying there will not be anymore big infrastructure projects,
but it will not be like before. The days of durian runtuh are gone.
The slow down and pessimistic business environment has dire
consequences that have affected or will affect many businesses
and individuals in the construction industry. The pre-occupied
concerns are how to weather the difficult years ahead and stay
nose above water. The dilemma of surplus workforce,
maintaining costs effectiveness and managing human resources
would indeed be formidable challenges to management. Underthese circumstances, an inevitable route, though sensitive, is to
reduce the workforce.
RIGHTSIZING AND REDUNDANCY
Retrenchment, as a consequential effect of rightsizing, has always
been a rather sensitive issue. Similar to other forms of
termination and dismissal, retrenchment is a form of dismissal
of a workman and he may consider that he has been dismissed
without just cause or excuse and hence makes representation
for reinstatement under Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations
Act 1967, which provides inter alia:
Where a workman, irrespective of whether he is a member of a trade
union of workmen or otherwise, considers that he has been
dismissed without just cause or excise by his employer, he may make
representations in writing to the Director General to be reinstated
in his former employment; the representations may be filed at the
office of the Director General nearest to the place of employment
from which the workmen was dismissed.
In the industrial law of Malaysia, it does not matter that the word
used in the letter is retrenchment or voluntary separation. Many
retrenchment and separation cases in the past were referred to
the Industrial Court. In two retrenchment cases awarded in 1997,
the two retrenched workmen (managers) were reinstated withfull back-wages totaling in excess of RM1,000,000. That was
certainly a hefty sum to pay aside from having to reinstate the
workmen to the jobs, which were declared redundant earlier.
VOLUNTARY SEPARATION SCHEME (VSS)
The Government has advised companies to adopt voluntary
separations scheme instead of normal retrenchment of surplus
employees, which often were hostile and conflict prone,
particularly where the workmen were unionised. As the term
suggests, the employees are to participate in it voluntarily.
Consequences Of An Involuntarily Voluntary Scheme
The consequences of a case where the Industrial Court has
determined that the separation was indeed involuntary, the
separation then becomes an unjust dismissal and the Industrial
Court may award reinstatement of the workmen or order
compensation in lieu of reinstatement.
RETRENCHMENT
Industrial Law On Retrenchment
Section 13(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 confers on the
employer the right on termination of the services of a workmanby reason of redundancy or by reason of reorganisation of an
employers profession, business, trade or work or the criteria for
such termination. The Industrial Court has always recognised
such employers right and will not disturb the termination of
workmen by retrenchment or voluntary separation unless it is
capricious, unjust or malicious.
The Principle Of Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)
It is trite law and a well-established principle that in retrenchment
of surplus employees, the principle of LIFO must be adhered to.
The Industrial Court has in past cases applied very strict scrutiny
where there were deviations. Only in a sprinkling of cases hadthe Court accepted deviations. However, in reality, most
companies found it difficult to comply completely with the LIFO
principle.
Severe Financial Consequences Of A Wrongful Retrenchment
The financial consequence of a wrongful retrenchment can be
very severe. Aside from the possibility of reinstatement which is
severe on financial impact, the Industrial Court could also award
compensations in lieu of reinstatement.
(a) Reinstatement
The dismissed employee will have to be reinstated to his former
position. With the reinstatement, the Company will have to pay
the employee back-wages from the date of dismissal until the
-
8/2/2019 @VSSI(98-100)
2/32 n d Q u a r t e r 2 0 0 5
rticleA
99
last hearing day of the case without any loss in service and
benefits, less any payment of compensation on retrenchment
or VSS. With severe backlog of cases now, some cases had taken
some three to four years from the date of dismissal to the final
hearing date.
(b) Compensation in lieu of reinstatement
In lieu of reinstatement, the Industrial Court may award
compensation. As a guide, the Court usually awards:
(i) Compensation for past services at one months salary for
each year of service up to the last day of hearing in Court;
PLUS
(ii) Compensation for loss of employment, i.e. back-wages, from
date of dismissal to the last day of hearing in Court.
TO OFFER VSS OR TO RETRENCH
With a surplus workforce that is more than the manpower that acompany needs, there could be several options like
redeployment, re-assignments, realignments, retrain for other
jobs, regional postings, outplacements, etc. However, one hard
and unavoidable fact remains is that when a company is unable
to absorb the surplus workforce, a redundancy arises.
The Differences Between Retrenchment And VSS, Its Pros
And Cons
The differences can be substantial between these two methods
to reduce surplus employees, and among them are:
CONDUCTING AN EXERCISE - WHETHER VSS OR
RETRENCHMENT
To conduct an effective retrenchment or VSS exercise, a company
must be prepared to spend long hours to deliberate on such a
need and its impact on the company as well as the employees.It has to analyse its organizations structure; focus on post-event
organisation effectiveness; empathize and be concern for the
redundant employees; and extend assistance to redundant
employees. Further, the company must focus on how to
communicate effectively such needs; call for understanding and
cooperation; and consolidate the remaining team into a lean,
cohesive and determined workforce. In order to handle it well,
there are three principle phases to such an exercise.
G The Planning Phase
The Planning Phase is perhaps the most critical task in a
retrenchment or VSS exercise as it may well spell success or
disaster. A Company must take this seriously and should notspare any effort to plan it well, having due consideration for the
well-being of the Company, the affected employees as well as
the remaining employees after the exercise, so as to reduce any
negative impact that could seriously undermine the interests of
the Company.
G The Implementation Phase
The implementation of any retrenchment or VSS exercise can
be traumatic both on the affected employees and the managers
who have to communicate the sad or not too good news. There
are not many managers who have the experience to handle such
a traumatic event. In one retrenchment exercise, the Managing
Director found it difficult to hand over the letters of retrenchmentto the affected employees and he decided to send it through
the office boy. You can imagine the furor; disappointment, anger
and hurt. This had resulted in almost all the employees filing
representation for unjust dismissal. The post-event results on
productivity; teamwork and cooperation was worst than before
the retrenchment.
It is pertinent that the Implementation Phase is properly
strategised and that the affected employees are handled
appropriately with empathy, care and dignity.
G The Consolidation Phase
It is equally important that a company must pay close attentionon the Consolidation Phase for the remaining employees. Many
employees would be concerned whether there could be further
retrenchment or VSS exercise in the near future of which they
may be affected. There will be more negative thoughts than
positive reactions. Therefore, they will be looking forward to the
company for directions and reassurances. In the Consolidation
Phase, the company must focus on how to instill confidence, jell
and energize the remaining workforce to focus on business and
positive actions that will ensure the very survival and success of
the company.
COMPENSATION PACKAGE AND FINANCIAL COST IMPACT
In designing the compensation package, there are various
practices, which defer from company to company as well as
Retrenchment VSS
Focus on actual surplus Focus on reducing the rightemployees number
Focus on right fit May not attract the right fitto stay
Potentially hostile Amicable
Hard approach Soft approach
Managers find it tough to handle Easy and less traumatic
Able to take off the right number May have difficult toachieve number
Contractual compensation or Needs an inducement orin law sweetener
Productivity can be disrupted Less disruption to productivity
Potential claims for unjust Less claims on unjustdismissals dismissals
May end in reinstatements Less exposure toreinstatements
Potentially additional Less exposure to morecompensation compensation
Impact on corporate image Corporate image is least
impacted
Industrial actions by employees No cause for industrial actions
-
8/2/2019 @VSSI(98-100)
3/32 n d Q u a r t e r 2 0 0 5
rticleA
100
MBJ
industry to industry. It all depends on the financial capability of
the company to meet the employees aspiration. Among the
compensation factors that a company should consider are:
G retrenchment and termination benefits in contract or in law
and market practicesG consideration for those nearing retirement
G should there be a maximum capping
G a lump sum top-up payment or an ex-gratia
G payment in lieu of notice
G payment in lieu of balance annual leave
G gratuity payment
G retirement benefit (contractual) on top of retrenchment
benefit
G housing loan repayment deferment
G car loan repayment deferment
G extension of staff purchase scheme
G special medical cases
G
maternity benefits to expecting female employeesG medical assistance for employees
In the absence of contractual provisions for retrenchment benefits,
the common practice seems to suggest the compensation at a
rate of one months basic salary for each year of service. There
were cases where some companies had paid compensation at
rates as high as 2.5 months for each year of service.
For employees who are covered by the Employment Act 1955,
the compensation cannot be less than the provisions in the
Employment (Termination & Lay-off Benefits) Regulations 1980,
which provides as follows:
(a) Less than 1 year of service : Nil
(b) => 1 but < 2 years of service : 10 days wages x completed years
(c) => 2 but < 5 years of service : 15 days wages x completed years
(d) => 5 years of service : 20 days wages x completed years
Also, for employees who are covered by the Employment Act
1955, the appropriate notice unless the contract provides for
more favourable terms; it cannot be less than :
(a) < 2 years of service : 4 weeks
(b) => 2 but < 5 years of service : 6 weeks
(c) => 5 years of service : 8 weeks
In a VSS exercise, some companies had stated that there would
not be any notice applicable as the offer and acceptance is based
on voluntary basis.
PITFALLS TO AVOID
To avoid the mistakes of past failed cases of retrenchment and
VSS and to ensure both smooth implementation as well as
organization effectiveness, a company should avoid the
following common pitfalls in a retrenchment and VSS exercises:
G Jump on the bandwagon to retrench to maximize profits
G Lack of a task force to spearhead the exercise
G Vacillate on needs for external consultants until the last
minute
G Fail to plan the effective organization based on future
business volume
G Fail to establish selection criteria on manpower needs
G Fail to update all employees records
G Identify surplus employees first rather than redundant posts
G Arbitrary decision on retrenchees
G Fail to justify any deviations from the LIFO principle
G Refuse to pay appropriate retrenchment compensationsG Refuse to serve any notice to the retrenchees
G March the employees out of the doors
G Disregard the opinions of the union
G Fail to develop communicate briefs, likely Questions and
Answers
G Fail to notify the Ministry of Human Resources
G Fail to seek assistance from the Inland Revenue Board for
early and bulk clearances
G Fail to notify the Immigration Department where foreign
workers are involved
G Fail to monitor the situation and address promptly all
grievances, queries and issues
G Disregard security requirements on documents andproperty
G Fail to consider the morale and productivity of remaining
employees
G Arbitrarily distribute the residual functions of retrenched
employees
G Lack in clarity of roles and responsibilities
G Did not retrain and develop remaining employees
G No activities to jell the remaining workforce towards new
organization goals
G Lack in strategies on various means and process for a
smooth and harmonious execution
G Lack of care and empathy
CONCLUSION
Retrenchment or VSS is a very traumatic exercise and the
downside risks and problems can be overwhelming if a company
handles it badly. Whilst a company needs to retrench surplus
employees, the manner and efficiency in handling the exercise
smoothly with care, empathy and dignity cannot be overlooked.
There are many pitfalls aside from the fact that the retrenchees
may file a case against the company. The post event productivity
is critical to the company after having retrenched or separated a
substantial number of employees and paying a large sum of
money in compensations. How quickly a company can recover
and move forward positively and efficiently depends largely on
how the retrenchment or VSS is planned and implemented. There
is no short cut.