@vssi(98-100)

Upload: saslina-kamaruddin

Post on 06-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 @VSSI(98-100)

    1/32 n d Q u a r t e r 2 0 0 5

    rticleA

    98

    Voluntary Separation SchemeAnd RetrenchmentBy Thomas Chow, Managing Director, Professional & Organisation Development Sdn. Bhd.

    The current business slowdown in the construction industry

    in Malaysia has come down rather hard on many

    construction companies, particularly those that depend

    substantially on Government projects. The Prime Minister, Dato

    Seri Abdullah Hj Ahmad Badawi has summed this up very

    succinctly in his press interview with The Star, after opening the

    Malay Construction Entrepreneurs Convention 2005 on June 11,

    2005, when he said: Contractors should face the stark reality that

    the construction boom in the country is over. They have to look forother opportunities, including those overseas. It is very likely we will

    not see another construction boom in the country. We have built

    enough roads, hospitals and schools to last us a very long time .I

    am not saying there will not be anymore big infrastructure projects,

    but it will not be like before. The days of durian runtuh are gone.

    The slow down and pessimistic business environment has dire

    consequences that have affected or will affect many businesses

    and individuals in the construction industry. The pre-occupied

    concerns are how to weather the difficult years ahead and stay

    nose above water. The dilemma of surplus workforce,

    maintaining costs effectiveness and managing human resources

    would indeed be formidable challenges to management. Underthese circumstances, an inevitable route, though sensitive, is to

    reduce the workforce.

    RIGHTSIZING AND REDUNDANCY

    Retrenchment, as a consequential effect of rightsizing, has always

    been a rather sensitive issue. Similar to other forms of

    termination and dismissal, retrenchment is a form of dismissal

    of a workman and he may consider that he has been dismissed

    without just cause or excuse and hence makes representation

    for reinstatement under Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations

    Act 1967, which provides inter alia:

    Where a workman, irrespective of whether he is a member of a trade

    union of workmen or otherwise, considers that he has been

    dismissed without just cause or excise by his employer, he may make

    representations in writing to the Director General to be reinstated

    in his former employment; the representations may be filed at the

    office of the Director General nearest to the place of employment

    from which the workmen was dismissed.

    In the industrial law of Malaysia, it does not matter that the word

    used in the letter is retrenchment or voluntary separation. Many

    retrenchment and separation cases in the past were referred to

    the Industrial Court. In two retrenchment cases awarded in 1997,

    the two retrenched workmen (managers) were reinstated withfull back-wages totaling in excess of RM1,000,000. That was

    certainly a hefty sum to pay aside from having to reinstate the

    workmen to the jobs, which were declared redundant earlier.

    VOLUNTARY SEPARATION SCHEME (VSS)

    The Government has advised companies to adopt voluntary

    separations scheme instead of normal retrenchment of surplus

    employees, which often were hostile and conflict prone,

    particularly where the workmen were unionised. As the term

    suggests, the employees are to participate in it voluntarily.

    Consequences Of An Involuntarily Voluntary Scheme

    The consequences of a case where the Industrial Court has

    determined that the separation was indeed involuntary, the

    separation then becomes an unjust dismissal and the Industrial

    Court may award reinstatement of the workmen or order

    compensation in lieu of reinstatement.

    RETRENCHMENT

    Industrial Law On Retrenchment

    Section 13(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 confers on the

    employer the right on termination of the services of a workmanby reason of redundancy or by reason of reorganisation of an

    employers profession, business, trade or work or the criteria for

    such termination. The Industrial Court has always recognised

    such employers right and will not disturb the termination of

    workmen by retrenchment or voluntary separation unless it is

    capricious, unjust or malicious.

    The Principle Of Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)

    It is trite law and a well-established principle that in retrenchment

    of surplus employees, the principle of LIFO must be adhered to.

    The Industrial Court has in past cases applied very strict scrutiny

    where there were deviations. Only in a sprinkling of cases hadthe Court accepted deviations. However, in reality, most

    companies found it difficult to comply completely with the LIFO

    principle.

    Severe Financial Consequences Of A Wrongful Retrenchment

    The financial consequence of a wrongful retrenchment can be

    very severe. Aside from the possibility of reinstatement which is

    severe on financial impact, the Industrial Court could also award

    compensations in lieu of reinstatement.

    (a) Reinstatement

    The dismissed employee will have to be reinstated to his former

    position. With the reinstatement, the Company will have to pay

    the employee back-wages from the date of dismissal until the

  • 8/2/2019 @VSSI(98-100)

    2/32 n d Q u a r t e r 2 0 0 5

    rticleA

    99

    last hearing day of the case without any loss in service and

    benefits, less any payment of compensation on retrenchment

    or VSS. With severe backlog of cases now, some cases had taken

    some three to four years from the date of dismissal to the final

    hearing date.

    (b) Compensation in lieu of reinstatement

    In lieu of reinstatement, the Industrial Court may award

    compensation. As a guide, the Court usually awards:

    (i) Compensation for past services at one months salary for

    each year of service up to the last day of hearing in Court;

    PLUS

    (ii) Compensation for loss of employment, i.e. back-wages, from

    date of dismissal to the last day of hearing in Court.

    TO OFFER VSS OR TO RETRENCH

    With a surplus workforce that is more than the manpower that acompany needs, there could be several options like

    redeployment, re-assignments, realignments, retrain for other

    jobs, regional postings, outplacements, etc. However, one hard

    and unavoidable fact remains is that when a company is unable

    to absorb the surplus workforce, a redundancy arises.

    The Differences Between Retrenchment And VSS, Its Pros

    And Cons

    The differences can be substantial between these two methods

    to reduce surplus employees, and among them are:

    CONDUCTING AN EXERCISE - WHETHER VSS OR

    RETRENCHMENT

    To conduct an effective retrenchment or VSS exercise, a company

    must be prepared to spend long hours to deliberate on such a

    need and its impact on the company as well as the employees.It has to analyse its organizations structure; focus on post-event

    organisation effectiveness; empathize and be concern for the

    redundant employees; and extend assistance to redundant

    employees. Further, the company must focus on how to

    communicate effectively such needs; call for understanding and

    cooperation; and consolidate the remaining team into a lean,

    cohesive and determined workforce. In order to handle it well,

    there are three principle phases to such an exercise.

    G The Planning Phase

    The Planning Phase is perhaps the most critical task in a

    retrenchment or VSS exercise as it may well spell success or

    disaster. A Company must take this seriously and should notspare any effort to plan it well, having due consideration for the

    well-being of the Company, the affected employees as well as

    the remaining employees after the exercise, so as to reduce any

    negative impact that could seriously undermine the interests of

    the Company.

    G The Implementation Phase

    The implementation of any retrenchment or VSS exercise can

    be traumatic both on the affected employees and the managers

    who have to communicate the sad or not too good news. There

    are not many managers who have the experience to handle such

    a traumatic event. In one retrenchment exercise, the Managing

    Director found it difficult to hand over the letters of retrenchmentto the affected employees and he decided to send it through

    the office boy. You can imagine the furor; disappointment, anger

    and hurt. This had resulted in almost all the employees filing

    representation for unjust dismissal. The post-event results on

    productivity; teamwork and cooperation was worst than before

    the retrenchment.

    It is pertinent that the Implementation Phase is properly

    strategised and that the affected employees are handled

    appropriately with empathy, care and dignity.

    G The Consolidation Phase

    It is equally important that a company must pay close attentionon the Consolidation Phase for the remaining employees. Many

    employees would be concerned whether there could be further

    retrenchment or VSS exercise in the near future of which they

    may be affected. There will be more negative thoughts than

    positive reactions. Therefore, they will be looking forward to the

    company for directions and reassurances. In the Consolidation

    Phase, the company must focus on how to instill confidence, jell

    and energize the remaining workforce to focus on business and

    positive actions that will ensure the very survival and success of

    the company.

    COMPENSATION PACKAGE AND FINANCIAL COST IMPACT

    In designing the compensation package, there are various

    practices, which defer from company to company as well as

    Retrenchment VSS

    Focus on actual surplus Focus on reducing the rightemployees number

    Focus on right fit May not attract the right fitto stay

    Potentially hostile Amicable

    Hard approach Soft approach

    Managers find it tough to handle Easy and less traumatic

    Able to take off the right number May have difficult toachieve number

    Contractual compensation or Needs an inducement orin law sweetener

    Productivity can be disrupted Less disruption to productivity

    Potential claims for unjust Less claims on unjustdismissals dismissals

    May end in reinstatements Less exposure toreinstatements

    Potentially additional Less exposure to morecompensation compensation

    Impact on corporate image Corporate image is least

    impacted

    Industrial actions by employees No cause for industrial actions

  • 8/2/2019 @VSSI(98-100)

    3/32 n d Q u a r t e r 2 0 0 5

    rticleA

    100

    MBJ

    industry to industry. It all depends on the financial capability of

    the company to meet the employees aspiration. Among the

    compensation factors that a company should consider are:

    G retrenchment and termination benefits in contract or in law

    and market practicesG consideration for those nearing retirement

    G should there be a maximum capping

    G a lump sum top-up payment or an ex-gratia

    G payment in lieu of notice

    G payment in lieu of balance annual leave

    G gratuity payment

    G retirement benefit (contractual) on top of retrenchment

    benefit

    G housing loan repayment deferment

    G car loan repayment deferment

    G extension of staff purchase scheme

    G special medical cases

    G

    maternity benefits to expecting female employeesG medical assistance for employees

    In the absence of contractual provisions for retrenchment benefits,

    the common practice seems to suggest the compensation at a

    rate of one months basic salary for each year of service. There

    were cases where some companies had paid compensation at

    rates as high as 2.5 months for each year of service.

    For employees who are covered by the Employment Act 1955,

    the compensation cannot be less than the provisions in the

    Employment (Termination & Lay-off Benefits) Regulations 1980,

    which provides as follows:

    (a) Less than 1 year of service : Nil

    (b) => 1 but < 2 years of service : 10 days wages x completed years

    (c) => 2 but < 5 years of service : 15 days wages x completed years

    (d) => 5 years of service : 20 days wages x completed years

    Also, for employees who are covered by the Employment Act

    1955, the appropriate notice unless the contract provides for

    more favourable terms; it cannot be less than :

    (a) < 2 years of service : 4 weeks

    (b) => 2 but < 5 years of service : 6 weeks

    (c) => 5 years of service : 8 weeks

    In a VSS exercise, some companies had stated that there would

    not be any notice applicable as the offer and acceptance is based

    on voluntary basis.

    PITFALLS TO AVOID

    To avoid the mistakes of past failed cases of retrenchment and

    VSS and to ensure both smooth implementation as well as

    organization effectiveness, a company should avoid the

    following common pitfalls in a retrenchment and VSS exercises:

    G Jump on the bandwagon to retrench to maximize profits

    G Lack of a task force to spearhead the exercise

    G Vacillate on needs for external consultants until the last

    minute

    G Fail to plan the effective organization based on future

    business volume

    G Fail to establish selection criteria on manpower needs

    G Fail to update all employees records

    G Identify surplus employees first rather than redundant posts

    G Arbitrary decision on retrenchees

    G Fail to justify any deviations from the LIFO principle

    G Refuse to pay appropriate retrenchment compensationsG Refuse to serve any notice to the retrenchees

    G March the employees out of the doors

    G Disregard the opinions of the union

    G Fail to develop communicate briefs, likely Questions and

    Answers

    G Fail to notify the Ministry of Human Resources

    G Fail to seek assistance from the Inland Revenue Board for

    early and bulk clearances

    G Fail to notify the Immigration Department where foreign

    workers are involved

    G Fail to monitor the situation and address promptly all

    grievances, queries and issues

    G Disregard security requirements on documents andproperty

    G Fail to consider the morale and productivity of remaining

    employees

    G Arbitrarily distribute the residual functions of retrenched

    employees

    G Lack in clarity of roles and responsibilities

    G Did not retrain and develop remaining employees

    G No activities to jell the remaining workforce towards new

    organization goals

    G Lack in strategies on various means and process for a

    smooth and harmonious execution

    G Lack of care and empathy

    CONCLUSION

    Retrenchment or VSS is a very traumatic exercise and the

    downside risks and problems can be overwhelming if a company

    handles it badly. Whilst a company needs to retrench surplus

    employees, the manner and efficiency in handling the exercise

    smoothly with care, empathy and dignity cannot be overlooked.

    There are many pitfalls aside from the fact that the retrenchees

    may file a case against the company. The post event productivity

    is critical to the company after having retrenched or separated a

    substantial number of employees and paying a large sum of

    money in compensations. How quickly a company can recover

    and move forward positively and efficiently depends largely on

    how the retrenchment or VSS is planned and implemented. There

    is no short cut.