volume 3 issue 3 march 2020 issn:...

VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3 MARCH 2020 ISSN: 2456-9666

JUS IMPERATOR www.jusimperator.org

AN INSIGHT TO ARTICLE 35A AND ARTICLE 370 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

-SUNIL KUMAR MISHRA1

Abstract

A mis-statement of Jammu and Kashmir is limited to the thoughts and wishes of some districts of

Kashmir and ignores the expectations of the vast majority of the border districts of Kashmir along

with the other two regions. J & K has long painful battle for peace and security. The most debatable

Articles 370 and 35A of the constitution, which are currently being challenged in the Supreme

Court to grant legal approval to the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly to grant exclusive

rights to "permanent residents", especially non-state residents, on citizenship States by prohibiting

them from enjoying the rights. This debate was often portrayed as the "special status" of Jammu

and Kashmir and some kind of unusual concession to the state. This paper aims to find out the

reality behind the issue of Jammu and Kashmir.

Keywords: Indian Constitution, Amendment, The Delhi Agreement states, The Constitution

(Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954, Permanent Resident.

Introduction

As of times, the lawfulness of Article 35A of the Constitution has been strongly discussed,

especially as it involves worry for Jammu and Kashmir. This article enables the state assembly to

characterize the "changeless occupants" of the express, their uncommon rights and privileges.It

was added to the Constitution through a presidential request of 1954 with the simultaneousness of

the state legislature of the day yet According to the Constitutional plan, lawfully the topic of that

Does the President of India have sole capacity to correct the Constitution through "Request"?.

Jammu and Kashmir state which is by and large alluded as Kashmir, is in certainty the portrayal

of the enormous state by a nearly little region of Kashmir valley rather than Jammu, Kashmir and

Ladakh areas. A bogus account of Jammu-Kashmir limits to the perspectives and wishes of a

1 Manager P&A, MBA (ISO &PR Management, PGDBM HR, LLM (Corporate law Management)



couple of regions of Kashmir and ignores the expectations of lion's share of the other two areas

just as the boondocks regions of Kashmir. J&K has a long difficult clash of harmony and security.

J&K has been generally well known among intelligent people like academicians, students of

history, government officials, barrier experts and media in the previous hardly any years.

Insecurity, dissenter developments and fear based oppression in J&K is being portrayed to India's

disappointment of complete reconciliation of state in Union. There is a huge skirmish of words on

media screens yet at the same time the topic of security and harmony has been left unanswered.

J&K has been a fight ground since years be it an outskirt practice or off-the-ground encounter. As

of late, a typical account on J&K has been spinning around ordinary distress in Kashmir Valley

reached out to Jammu which is obvious by different stone pelting, fear assaults and experiences

between Indian security powers and separatists. In addition, Pakistan's intension to attach the state

mightily and reliable advancement of fear exercises in J&K and different states for its own

advantage has been a torment in the Arse for the eventual fate of J&K. The whole system of fear

and its system has the help of Pakistan which is being utilized for Pak-supported Proxy Wars like

Uri, Pulwama and so forth. Moreover, youth is being confused and constrained towards stone

pelting and revolts, with a bogus impression of Jihad.Imposition of Article 370 in Indian

Constitution giving 'Impermanent Special Status' has been obvious in prolongation of dissenter

condition. Essentially, Article 370 gives that the articles of Indian Constitution managing the

organization for the states in An indian area are not material to J&K. also, the intensity of

Parliament to make rules for the state is restricted (just Union and Concurrent rundown are relevant

that too when pronounced by the president in meeting with the state government). Article 370 that

was sanctioned for transitory period considering exceptional conditions in the state J&K as moved

by Gopala swami Ayyenger in 1949 yet it is as yet usable which was asserted by Supreme Court

in n the instance of PremNathKaul v State of J and K 1959AIR 759, Sampath Kumar v State of J

and K 1969 AIR 1153.

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on August 31st 2018 conceded for the fourth time a conference on a

petition challenging Article 35A. The SupremeCourt has rescheduled it for second seven

day stretch of January 2019. This appeal has prompted wide spread fights all over Kashmir



since thepetition intends to scrap Article 35A which allows the privilege to the Jammu and

Kashmir lawmaking body to decide "changeless occupants".

The changeless inhabitants thus appreciate extraordinary rights and benefits as to work,

securing of unfaltering property,settlements and grants. In 2014, a NGO considered We the

Citizen, recorded a request challenging the lawfulness of Article 35A. This request should

be heard in August 2017 yet from that point forward it has been deferred a few times

inferable from fight by the Jammu and KashmirGovernment. The issue of Article 35A is

being anticipated as an established issue in light of the fact that the inclusion of Article

35A took placethrough a Presidential request instead of the protected course of Article 368

which recommends the system to alter theconstitution. In any case, the issue isn't simply

established, it has political meanings too in light of the fact that BJP obviously states in its

manifestoreleased before the 2014 decisions, its aim to scrap Article 35A and has expressed

a few times that it will discover a 'permanentsolution' for Kashmir. In this main story, we

will start first with the political foundation to Article 35A and Article 370 and thenmove

on the lawful contentions that have been introduced. Any conversation on this is deficient

without a reference to the thought offederalism; this main story additionally analyzes this

Article in the light of the structure of federalism as to Jammu and Kashmir.

Legal comprehension of the issue:The appeal advances two contentions - one that the

article was not presented through Article 368 which is the genuine method for getting the

correction the constitution. The other contention made is that it disregards the essential

structure. The Article separated from allowing J and K of characterizing "lasting

occupants" of the State additionally excludes such enactment being abrogated on the

ground that they encroach either of the crucial rights ensured of the Constitution. It is this

insusceptibility which is being fought against. Essential structure alludes to the

fundamental foundation of our constitution and therefore our country. The legal executive

in 1973 in KesavanandaBharati v State of Kerala6 , plainly expresses that essential

highlights, for example, our Fundamental Rights, Secularism and Federalism can't be

changed. It might be said this restrains the altering intensity of the Parliament. Be that as it

may, here revising power doesn't unequivocally stretch out to Article 370 too. 7 Moreover,



through a five adjudicator seat in Waman Rao v Union of India 8 , the Supreme Court held

that where sacred corrections make vested rights in people, an alteration settled on

preceding the choice in Kesavananda can't be helpless to an essential structure challenge.

Regardless of whether Supreme Court through a setting up an in excess of five adjudicator

seat goes past Waman Rao v Union of India judgment, at that point we need to see the

repercussions of the test in the request. This test has been presented following 65 years,

which infers the candidate needs to demonstrate that why the request was not raised

previously and what is that criticality which has out of nowhere prompted recording this

appeal. In addition, a few properties would have changed hands since the Article 35 a has

been in power and an abrupt change presently would put J and K in a defenseless

circumstance and they would coherently translate it as an assault on the exceptional status

they have been given . On the off chance that only the chance of a consultation has made

this pressure and disorder, at that point if the article really is rejected it would bother the

circumstance prompting further precariousness. Mediating for a state like the J and K

where the state is in a nonstop condition of transition and for the most part about pondering

disorder and savagery, is certifiably not an "unadulterated inquiry of law" as has been

advanced by Central Government.We likewise have another appeal recorded by a Jammu

and Kashmir local CharuWali Khanna who has tested the defendability of Article 35A on

the premise that the article confines her entitlement to property if a local lady weds a man

not holding a lasting inhabitant authentication. Jammu and Kashmir isn't the main state to

put the limitation of purchasing property from outcasts. Himachal Pradesh, Andaman and

Nicobar Island, Nagaland, Sikkim and Andhra Pradesh additionally have such limitations.

The inquiry that emerges here is whether we should survey the limitations in these states

as well. It is essential to allude here that through the request in Jammu and Kashmir v

Dr.Sushila Sawhney9 and others, J &K court said that the girl of a lasting inhabitant

wedding an individual outside the state would not lose the status of changeless occupant

of J &K however the privilege of the youngsters as to property was not managed which

stays to be chosen by SC. Concerning, A.G.Noorani, protected researcher, has expressed

that "Article 35A is past test. In India the desire for consistency has common disapproved

majoritarian. The consolidation of new Article in particular Article 35A to the Constitution

of India has been affected vide Constitution(Application to Jammu and Kashmir)order



1954 which is past the purview and intensity of Respondent No.1 in light of the fact that

the said arrangement in particular Ar 35A is illegal. " We likewise have another appeal

recorded by a Jammu and Kashmir local CharuWali Khanna who has tested the

defendability of Article 35A on the premise that the article confines her entitlement to

property if a local lady weds a man not holding a lasting occupant endorsement. Jammu

and Kashmir isn't the main state to put the limitation of purchasing property from outcasts.

Himachal Pradesh, Andaman and Nicobar Island, Nagaland, Sikkim and Andhra Pradesh

likewise have such limitations. The inquiry that emerges here is whether we should audit

the limitations in these states as well. It is essential to allude here that through the request

in Jammu and Kashmir v Dr.Sushila Sawhney10and others, J &K court said that the girl of

a lasting occupant wedding an individual outside the state would not lose the status of

changeless inhabitant of J &K however the privilege of the youngsters as to property was

not managed which stays to be chosen by SC. Concerning, A.G.Noorani, protected

researcher, has expressed that "Article 35A is past test. In India the desire for consistency

has public disapproved majoritarian. The consolidation of new Article in particular Article

35A to the Constitution of India has been affected vide Constitution(Application to Jammu

and Kashmir)order 1954 which is past the purview and intensity of Respondent No.1

because the said arrangement in particular Ar 35A is illegal. "

Chronicled approach of Article 35A J&K: has been seeing broad fights and passings in the

state since years. To comprehend the Kashmir emergency it is basic to take a gander at the

verifiable parts of J&K accurately. Jammu-Kashmir was a royal stateunder British Empire

in India and governed by Dogra administration. Since 19thcentury Jammu had been the

decision spot of DograRajputs when Maharaja Gulab Singh was made a genetic lord by

Sikh ruler Ranjit Singh. Maharaja Ranjit Singh had added this area from Afghan rulers in

1819. After the Sikh destruction in First Anglo-Sikh war (1845-1846) and under the Treaty

of Amritsar (16 walk 1846), Gulab Singh, Raja of Jammu bought Kashmir from the East

India Company for a reimbursement installment of 7.5 million Nanakshahi rupees and

became Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir. Jammu-Kashmir turned into an autonomous

regal state under the suzerainty of British Empire. Maharaja Hari Singh, the last leader of

J&K was coroneted in 1925. He was administering the state at the hour of autonomy too.



In 1947, when British India was separated into India and Pakistan under the Two Nation

hypothesis and Indian Independence Act 1947 completion the suzerainty of British Empire.

During British principle India was involved regions direct under British crown and 565

royal states. Royal states had power over their inner issues with the exception of resistance

and outside undertakings. The Government of India presented the idea of the Instrument of

Accession. J&K turned into a position of disputes in 1947 when there was an inquiry before

royal states to join either India or Pakistan of which J&K was a section. According to the

approach of Divide and Rule British Government gave the states this decision to join either

India or Pakistan. After a long battle of increase of regal states Junagarh, Hyderabad and

J&K left with inconvenience. Later on Junagarh and Hyderabad additionally turned into

the piece of India according to the endeavors of Sardar Patel with a few formulae like

bordering domains to India and decision dependent on the primary religion of the populace.

Particularly J&K had normal limits with India and Pakistan both. Furthermore, J&K had

strict polarity between the standard of Dogra tradition and most of populace that was

Muslim. This was the significant issue identified with the fate of J&K. Before initiation of

October 1947 innate attacks from North West Frontier Province, Maharaja proposed to

remain free. Be that as it may, after attack of huge towns when these tribesmen up flooding

towards Srinagar, Maharaja called for Military help from India which was given under the

states of increase to India concerning the individuals. On October 26, 1947 the Maharaja

offered a letter of increase to India, acknowledged by India without a vote by the Kashmiri

individuals which prompted a discussion on authenticity of promotion.

Prior to Independence (1927, 1932)The far from being obviously true Article 35A of the

Constitution, which is as of now being tested in the Supreme Court for bearing Jammu and

Kashmir Assembly legitimate authorization to give uncommon Non-permanent residents

of J&K itself cannot buy immovable property in J&K. They are not eligible for

employment in the state government jobs of J&K.

Non-permanent residents cannot contest or vote in local bodies or Legislative Assembly

elections. Those who have no state subject cannot avail of scholarships and other grants

offered by the state government to its permanent residents.

They cannot pursue any appeal for compensation of their rights in any court, local or

national.



Right to Equality and liberty, the core of democracy in Indian Constitution has been wiped

out under the provisions of Article 35A.It limits the rights and liberties of other Indian

citizens in J&K.

The provisions of Article 35A violate the principles of gender equality by discriminating

against women residents of the state who marry a person from another state.

Their children are also not entitled to the Permanent Resident Certificate (PRC) or the

benefits of the state subject in J&K like the right to acquire immovable property and

employed under government jobs.

Article 35A discourages the corporate sector from investing in the state due to the

provisions preventing them from buying immovable property.

Since this Article 35A was inserted as an Appendix, which is not a part of the official text

of the Constitution after Article 35. It was never presented before the Parliament as the sole

authority to amend the Constitution is vested only in the Parliament of India.

Article 370 limited central legislative powers over the state only to the matters of defense,

foreign affairs and communications.

Other constitutional provisions of Central Government are extended to J&K State only with

State Government’s consensus.

State Government’s authority to give its ‘concurrence’ was only until the State Constituent

Assembly was commenced.

Article 370 itself holds the provision to be repealed or amended only upon the

recommendation of the State’s Constituent Assembly but it was dissolved without making

any changes in Article 370.

Residual Power remains with the state of Jammu & Kashmir except all other states of the

Indian Territory.

Central Government has applied various provisions with the consent of State Government.

The Union Government of India lacks the power to proclaim Financial Emergency under

Article 360 in the state.

The Centre can declare emergency in the state only in case of War or External Aggression.

Except other states of India emergency on the grounds of internal disturbance or

forthcoming danger thereof may be proclaimed in the J&K state without request or the



concurrence of the government of the state. In December 1964, Articles 356 and 357 were

extended to the state.

Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles of the Constitution of India are not applicable

to J&K State.

Fundamental rights, Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution are still applicable to

the permanent Residents of J&K State; therefore the Fundamental Right to property is still

guaranteed in this state.

The major implications of Article 370 that it has built emotional and psychological

blockades between the people of Jammu and Kashmir and the rest of India, thus

encouraging a psychology of separatism and alienation.

To consider the truth behind the story of J&K as predominant since years and the craving of

individuals living in the state with respect to the arrangements and advantages of Article 370 and

35A, a couple of occupants of J&K State were talked with which is as per the following:

When Mudasir Ahmed, changeless Resident of J&K, from Pulwama, filled in as Skill

Development Trainer in SriNagar was gotten some information about the offices in J&K when

contrasted with different states given that he had been to Rajasthan, Maharashtra and so forth.. He

answered that J&K is lingering behind as far as offices like ITI ideas, ability advancement program

in towns, monetary assets because of elevated level of debasement in the state. Youth is totally

confused in the state due to no improvement approaches by government toward work.

Incomprehensible pronouncement of interior independence by ideological groups with no plan of

improvement of the state and rehashed disappointments of government has driven the state into

ruin. Another respondent of meeting, Fayaz Ahmed Meer, a representative of customary Hand-

made wooden things in Srinagar accepted that the explanation of stone-pelting is joblessness and

fear mongering. Individuals of Srinagar can scarcely procure their meat and potatoes from little

untalented business for 2-3 days in seven days because of huge psychological oppressor exercises

during the week. Them two accepted that Article 370 ought to be evacuated and the state ought to

be created like different conditions of India through expanding fiscal ventures in that. On the

opposite side, Dr. Farooq, an Ayurvedic clinical official didn't need Article 370 and 35A to be

expelled on the grounds that it can cause shortage of assets because of inflow of individuals from



different states. . He included that being a specialist he can scarcely acquire from his center on

account of huge fear exercises and resulting 'Band or strikes'. He accepted that there ought to be

an effective research organization to sift through the issues of the state. Dr. Asif Ahmed, an

associate teacher of a school was against the expulsion of Article 370 and 35A as he accepted that

it would take the employments of Kashmir inhabitants and the circumstances will be most

exceedingly terrible when individuals will originate from different states. Be that as it may, he had

an endearing truth of challenges being looked by the individuals during dread circumstances.

Presidential Orders As of condition (1) of the Article 370 thinks the ability to President to be

practiced with the simultaneousness of state administration of Jammu and Kashmir. Leader of

India passed various requests as applied to Jammu and Kashmir. The Presidential request of 1950

as demonstrated The Constitutional (Application to Jammu &Kashmir) Order, 1950 sanctioned on

26th January 1950 perceived the articles of the Indian Constitution relating to the Instrument of

Accession as distinguished by the proviso b (I) of Article 370. It gives that authoritative intensity

of parliament will be constrained to those issues in Union List and the Concurrent rundown that

are pronounced to compare to issues indicated in Instrument of Accession by the President in

discussion with the state government. Eight subjects of association rundown and ten out of twenty

two pieces of the Indian Constitution were reached out to J&K with certain resistances as presented

by the state government.

Delhi Agreement, 1952an understanding between Sheik Abdullah and Jawaharlal Nehru,

concluded on 24th July 1952, frequently alluded to as the 'Delhi Agreement'. Delhi Agreement

was the consequence of conversations on Center-State relations between Union government and

the appointment from J&K held after the update submitted to President by Jammu PrajaParishad

requesting the total use of Indian Constitution to the state. Delhi Agreement built up the sway as

expressed in Instrument of Accession will live in the state, and residuary forces of governing body

explicitly if there should arise an occurrence of J&K will be vested in the State itself. State

governing body was offered capacity to enact thinking extraordinary rights and benefits to the

'Express subjects' in the light of State subject warnings of 1927 and 1932. State assembly was

engaged to make laws for 'express subjects' come back to Kashmir who had gone to Pakistan in

1947. The situation of Sadar-I-Riyasat was settled upon who will be chosen by governing body



itself. The entire section of 'Central Rights' of Indian Constitution couldn't be made relevant to the

state. Just re-appraising locale of Supreme Court is relevant to the state. State assignment

contradicted the announcement of general crisis because of inside disturbance.17 The Presidential

request of 1952 was passed on fifteenth November 1952 on the solicitation by J&K state

government changing the Article370. This request spoke to the cancelation of government in

Jammu and Kashmir. Simultaneously an across the country crusade from the Hindus was upraised

with levels of popularity for incorporation of Kashmir. BakshiGhulam Mohammed came into

power in August 1953 who was in favor for combination with India. Eventually, January 1954 saw

another understanding haggled among Center and J&K, which was passed by the Kashmir

Constituent Assembly and at the appropriate time presented through a Presidential Order 1954.

The Presidential Order 1954 presented a verifiable Article 35A in the constitution, which is driving

across the nation turmoil ridden situations of debates. This request ornamented the State with

tremendous forces and self-rule.

Debate around the Article 35A: - Article 35A is dependent upon a great deal of discussion of the

Indian masses, individuals view it as a risk to the Indian power and honesty. In 2014, a NGO called

"We the Citizens" tested Article 35A in the Supreme Court on grounds that it was not added to the

Indian Constitution by an alteration under Article 368 which accommodates the strategy of making

a Constitutional Amendment. Likewise, as the law requires a Presidential Order is to be introduced

before the Parliament inside a half year of its authorization, the equivalent was rarely done. It

likewise contends that four agents from the State were individuals from the Constituent Assembly

associated with the drafting of the Constitution and Jammu and Kashmir was never rendered any

exceptional status in the Constitution. As the title of the Chapter portrays, Article 370 was just a

'transitory arrangement' to acquire consistency J&K and bolster the political arrangement of the

State. Article 35A is against the trustworthiness and "very soul of unity of India" as it makes

division and makes "class inside a class of Indian residents". Restricting residents from different

States of India from landing into positions or purchasing steadfast property inside J&K is an

infringement of key rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

A case study of Discrimination against ValmikiCommunitySCs in Kashmir has been the most

exceedingly awful influenced in the entire State because of Article 35A. One of such network in



Kashmir is the Valmiki people group, additionally called the SafaiKaramcharis. Valmiki are one

of the most unfortunate the networks and are under the destitution line. The people group is held

without equivalent by the Government under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution as has been

granted to different inhabitants of Jammu and Kashmir. They are not given the essential thing

rights by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir in the of Article 35A, that was, embedded in

Indian Constitution in 1954 supplanting the establishedprocedure. Article 35A blesses the class

segregation which arrangements hit to rights and pride of SafaiKaramcharis of J&K. They are

denied by State Government in a prejudicial way, the Certificate of Permanent Resident, option to

cast a ballot in appointment of thelegislative get together, government employments, grants and

other social government assistance plans, besides, their youngsters are also not permitted to take

affirmation in Professional universities. The Article have diminished them to a "peasant" where

the network can just fill in as Sweeper.

Forces identifying with Emergency Provisions: - according to the Article, the President of India

can't announce a crisis in the State of Jammuand Kashmir utilizing Article 352 without the

interview of the Jammu and Kashmir Governor.The arrangement of Article 360 which permits the

President to broadcast Financial Emergency(allowances decrease and pay rates) isn't relevant in

the State also. Crisis underArticle 352 must be broadcasted by the President of India, in a

circumstance of War andExternal Aggression. Likewise, there isn't arrangement of execution of

President's standard underArticle 356, yet it discusses the standard of Governor. In this manner, in

a circumstance of disappointment tocomply with the necessary bearings, no force is vested by the

Union Government for suspension of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir End

A brutal truth of ramifications of Article 370 and 35A that breaks the stories about the conditions

in J&k. there is a need to change the circumstances of J&K by presenting broad formative

strategies and giving equivalent rights to the general public of J&K state. All the survivors of state

may get equity on the expulsion of prejudicial arrangements of Article 370 and 35A. These are the

ladies of J&K who decide to wed outside the state and in doing as such, lose the appropriate for

their posterity to be state subjects. The vagrants from West Pakistan who came in 1947 and settled

in Jammu Division and the Valmikies (Safai Karamcharies) who despite everything endure and

anticipating equity. A free biggest majority rule country should thoroughly consider the essential



privileges of the residents and should expel the discriminatory laws to keep up concordance and

harmony. Here is the need to set up fairness for the far reaching development of the express that

requires the Article 370 and 35A to be expelled so the young people of state may secure the

position openings and gel with the residents of India from other states.The Indian Constitution is

the most productively composed constitution, conceived for any nation. Inside this it is the best

arrangement of different constitutions. The individuals from our Constituent Assembly ought to

have been entirely sensible in figuring our Constitution because of the assorted variety of the

country. India is known as the place where there is solidarity in assorted variety and its credit can

be given to the creators of our delightful constitution and our eminent constitution.

References

1. Panikkar, K. M. 1930. Gulab Singh. London: Martin Hopkinson Ltd. p 111-125

2. http://jklaw.nic.in/instrument_of_accession_of_jammu_and_kashmir_state.pdf

3. Khan Fakiha 2001"Nuking Kashmir: Legal Implications of Nuclear Testing by Pakistan and

India in

the Context of the Kashmir Dispute" 29 Ga J Int'l & Comp Ltd. p 363.

4. Ibid, pp. 361, 364

5. Malhotra V P Brig (Retd) 2010 “Security and Defense Related Treaties of India”, Vij Books

India Pvt

Ltd,New Delhi, pp 65-67

6. Schofield Victoria 2003 “Kashmir in conflict: India, Pakistan and Unending war” I.B.Tauris&

Co

Ltd., London, pg. 17

7.Vikas Pathak, RSS THINK TANK SPEAKS UP FOR SCS IN KASHMIR THE HINDU (2016),

8.https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rss-think-tank-speaks-up-for-scs-in-

kashmir/article7758335.ece (last visited Mar 26, 2019).

9. Faizan Mustafa, UNDERSTANDING ARTICLES 370, 35ATHE INDIAN EXPRESS (2019),

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/understanding-articles-370-35a-jammu-kashmir-

indian-constitution-5610996/ (last visited Mar 26, 2019).

10. Alankrita Singh, Special status of Jammu & Kashmir - J&K Constitution - Article 370

iPleaders (2018),



11.https://blog.ipleaders.in/special-status-of-jammu-kashmir/ (last visited Mar 26, 2019).

12. The Constitution of India, art. 370.ABDUL GAFOOR ABDUL MAJEED NOORANI,

ARTICLE 370: A CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR(2015).

13. PurnimaKishwar, Of Article 370, Plebiscite & Hindu Refugees of POJ&K Flogging Dead

Horses and Ignoring Live Issues Swarajya (2016), https://swarajyamag.com/magazine/flogging-

dead-horses (last visited Mar 26, 2019).

14.Balbir Ram Rattan, ARTICLE 370—SHOULD IT CONTINUE OR GO ? - SCOOP NEWS

JAMMU KASHMIR, http://scoopnews.in/det.aspx?q=30339 (last visited Mar 26, 2019)

volume 3 issue 3 march 2020 issn:...

Documents