5aF05SE0093 2 .7113 ROWAN LAKE 010

'••:;..--,.- . ,, , . _ " " —f-~*f^' •- " ' •"';•; .|. '' t

5 C". v.j- !,_;, { V r- • > ^

VLF EM-16 Survey Mining Claim K 728588 Rowan Lake Area Kenora Mining District

Ontario

ic E "N OR" AI.1INING DiV,

k [" ^ i i v/ K AUG 1 3 1984

AM

Introduction

This report is a'summary of results and data which were obtained in a VLF EM 16 survey which was conducted on mining claim K728588 in the Rowan Lake area in the Kenora Mining Division of northwestern Ontario. The claim is owned by Alex Rosenthal and the survey was conducted by Harbinger Exploration Ltd. on May 19 and 20 of 1984.

Location, Access, Grid

The property is located approximately 40 air miles east of Sioux Narrows at the southernmost tip of eastern Scott Bay on Caviar Lake. The property was accessed via float plane from Sioux Narrows.

A total of 2.5 miles of line were cut, picketed, and flagged at 200 feet intervals across the claim. The #4 post of 728588 was chosen as reference point and the baseline was cut 1550 feet soutKfrom this post. Due to time constraints, only the 000, 400, 800, and 1200 lines and the eastern, western, and southern claim lines were surveyed with the VLP, A total of 434 readings were taken with 25 feet between stations.

Personnel

The survey readings were taken by Lorne Rosenthal and Robert Kozin (geologists), and the line cutting was undertaken by Alexander Rosenthal Sr. and Alexander Rosenthal Jr.

Instrumentation

The instrument used to conduct the survey was a VLF EM 16 unit rented from Geonics Ltd. of Toronto, Onta rio. All east-west lines were run using Maryland NSS 21.4 Khz as signal station and all readings were taken facing east. The two north-south lines were run using Seattle NLK 24.8 Khz as base station and all readings were taken facing south.

Geology

The claim is underlain by a sequence of 'mafic vol- canics which strike NNE across the claim. This sequence is heavily intruded by a late gabbro-diorite intrusive phase. Recent geological mapping by Kaye 1972 (ODM P. 831) has mapped a shear zone striking across the property and . \ this exploration program was mounted to determine if the shear zone was mineralized and if so, to determine if it had any geophysical signature.

In the course .,of conducting this survey it was observed that a large amount of alteration was present in the volcanics on the east side of the creek. The

mafic volcanics are bleached to a whitish grey color and contain 2-5% pyrite and show evidence of abundant carbona- tization and crosscutting carbonate veins. A very pronoun ced schistosity /shearing was observed on the 800 grid line approximately 800 feet east of the baseline. The mafic volcanics on the eastern side of the creek are massive and pillowed and show no evidence of ^shearing and/or alteration. A number of samples were sent in for assay but no results had been obtained at the time this report was written.

Interpretation/Results

A number of excellent VLP crossovers were outlined and a plot of these can be seen in the accompanying map. The only conductors which appear to have any continuity are situated on the eastern side of the creek and are probably related to the conductive effects of the water* However, it is possible that these crossovers are related to bed rock conductivity as the most pronounced alteration/pyriti- zation observed in the area are situated at the base of the outcrop which parallels the creek approximately 100 feet east of where the conductor is indicated on the map. It is possible that the creek is located along a recessive shear zone which may be mineralized,

Another interesting crossover occurs on the eastern boundary of the claim approximately 425 feet south of the #1 post. There is no bedrock in the area and it is diffi cult to interpret this anomaly further. Assuming an approximate 45C strike for the rocks in the area, this anomaly does not appear to line up with any of the other conductors described above,

Recommendations

A comprehensive sampling/geochemical programme should be initiated to determine if any gold values can be obtained from the pyritized, carbonatized volcanics. In addition, an SP programme should be initiated to determine if the pyritized volcanics, where observed in outcrop, do' have a geophysical signature. If anomalous gold values are present, a drill hole could be recommended to test these VLF conductors described above,

Respectfully submitted,

Lome RosenthalGeologist BSc (Honors), MScHarbinger Exploration Ltd.

August 1, 1984

SCOTT BAY

CAVIAR LAKE

HARBINGER EXPLORATION VLF EM 16 SURVEY

CAMERON LAKE PROSPECTI* ph«»« q««dr«tur«

conductor

/ .i

.. ___-y '» v«.. , ̂ ,.^ »«<» —— ̂..f'W^ i^

i \r\ : \

o

h?&

£ 5

$

$

£ jj.'|i'f

X -

n

f £'

^Sr *

Jiat

3fl»

M IT I

I0?

I

°HN

I c-

Ministryof Report of WorkHJjkrces (Geophysical, Geological,

Ontario ^^F Geochemical and Expenditures)

The MiType of Survey(s)

Claim Holder(s)

5><!Hte6t*»93 B . / 1 ) 3 ROWAN LAKE 900u /Hdfefl

Prospector's Licence No.

Address

Survey Company* 7/7

Date of Survey (from & to) Total Miles of line Cut84 \ 21 , CJ. %4-

\ Yr. I Day 1^3.1*9^Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

-

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

%'if • E lectromagnetic

• Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

• Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

4o

Days per Claim

—— ———

—— ——— -

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

$ -5- 15

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. - ,

Date Recorded Holde

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix NumberExpend. Days Cr,

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

Total number of mining claims covered by this report Of work.

Expend. Days Cr.

i, having performed the workI hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work an or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Date Cortified

//<?#>,/

Certified by (Sigoajure)

Ontario

Ministry of Natural ResourcesGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION ..CONCLUSIONS ETC.

a §ws

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)_

£t>u!»AM LAY.I? . MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

Survey Company_ Author of Report. UoriA.fr

Address of Author.Covering Dates of Survey_

Total Miles of Line Cut_

Ml. ft W ft&t^linecUtting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic.

DAYSper claim

4o

—Radiometric.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special proviiion creditt do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic . Radiometric(enter dayi per claim)

'(prefix)" (number)

DATE:. Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol. .QualificationsPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

TOTAL CLAIMS———1———jL

S3 T <S/79I

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval __ Profile scale ____Contour interval _

2.00 to .

.Number of ReadingsT • •JLme spacing

C

Instrument.— Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ___

I 1 I

Instrument,Coil configuration Coil separation Accuracy Method:

66(>iA\d.< feM ll

Parameters measured

__

G3 Fixed transmitter O Shoot back2.1 A

__

CD In line__

D Parallel line

\ tfft^£(specify V.L.F. station)

O

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

NDUCED POLARIZATION

Method D Time Domain Parameters — On time . ........

H Off time> Delay time ——————————————

fe Integration time

Electrode array — _ ————————— - —————Electrode soacine ——— _ —————————————— -

O Frequency Domain FrequencyRange

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument——————————————————————————————————————_ Range.Survey Method _____________________________________________

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument___Values measured.Energy windows (levels) _____________________________________ Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector__________________________________________ Overburden _____________________________________________

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——————————————————————— Instrument ________________________ Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

{specify for each type of survey) Accuracy—————————————————

(specify for each type of lurvey) Aircraft used————————————————————————————————

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight———————

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain________

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent

p. p.m. p. p. b.

Dn n

Cu, Pb, Zn,

Others____

Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (-Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. {___________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used__

Commercial Laboratory (_ Name of Laboratory_ Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General. General.

y*- -s •''-

DO

GPA

W

LAK

E

t-n.VA.es

Qu.ee v,N

b*

V^*"** — *™r

R E C-EI V-EJPnd Management Branch'

. [>\ ^rfr^t(op««\tig5«B).

u

dcl\4- ̂ -

:4jfi^^

^-.-1 _ (iu-tL-j!^--^^^^^L__

i« :^t^OvA^c-'^. fU(4=i' xQ ___ _\J • •

« \

. LX

^

72B061 ID 5

n U i

cu..Vi e-v- ^ CVi UK-. . .f ^.^

Name: Lome Richard Philip Rosenthal ,.,Age; 28 ' x •'.'..';;,; • -,..Birthdate: April 7, 1956 ,, ' ' :J——————— f ii: I' !-,,Citizenship: Canadian : > fe;.u^^^^•••••^•••^•••••••^^MB f •, , " "••..'' „'.

Marital Status; Married, two children '"""•'•„ >

Education1984 MSc. Geology in Clastic Sedimentology

McMaster University, Hamilton, OntarioThesis topic: The Sedimentology and Petrography of the Upper Cretaceous Belly River and Wapiabi Formations of Southwestern Alberta

1978 BSc. Honors GeologyUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba

1974 Grade XII Senior MatriculationStonewall Collegiate, Stonewall, Manitoba

Awards1974 R.M. Brownell Award for high standing 4th year Honors

Geology1973 M. Smerchanski Award for high standing 3rd year Honors

Geology

PublicationsRosenthal, L., Leckie, D., Nadon, G. The Stratigraphy and

Pacies Relationships with the Upper Cretaceous Belly River and Wapiabi Formations of Southwestern Alberta. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologist Guidebook August, 1984

Rosenthal, L., and Walker, R.G. Anatomy of a Storm Dominated Delta-Shoreline Complex. Abstracts, International Association Sedimentologis^s" 1982, Hamilton, Ontario

Work ExperienceSeptember 1982 to present Employer: Murphy Oil Canada Ltd.

I am presently employed at Murphy Oil as an exploration geologist working within the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Most of the projects have been directed at play generation with in the Devonian section of south and central Alberta. In all these projects, a strong emphasis has been placed on first understanding the depositional and diagenetic facies which comprise the prospective units and then to develop specific prospects within that regional context. All relevant explora tion techniques employed in these studies including detailed

log and core analyses, sample and core descriptions, use of hydrodynamic pressure-depth plots from DST data, shallow control residual mapping, and seismic modelling techniques.

Regional mapping projects have been completed on the Nisku-Leduc interval in the Bashaw - Stettler - Drumheller Basin, along the south margin of the Homeglen Rimby reef trend and in the Princess Youngstown area.

In addition, a I large prospect in the Majeau Lake - Onaway Region west of Edmonton was evaluated to assess potential at the Cretaceous and Wabuman - Nisku levels.

Prior to joining the Alberta Basin Group, several regional projects were completed in the Williston Basin of southern Saskatchewan. The Red River ,Winnipegosis and Nisku - Birdbear Formations were mapped over large portions of the basin and detailed facies work was completed in the Weyburn - Estevan region. In addition, a detailed assess ment of the Viking potential in the area south of the Dodsland - Eureka - Hoosier trend was completed.

As well as generating prospects and evaluating land sales, a portion of the time is spent in geologic operations. In this capacity, I work closely with reservoir and drilling engineers, making completion and abandonment decisions using detailed core and log analyses.

In addition to the above named responsibilities, I organized and led a technical in-house field trip to review the tectonic and stratigraphic history of the Cordillera 1 of southwestern Alberta.

January 1981 to September 1982 Employer: Geology DepartmentMcMaster University

During this time period, I was a graduate student at McMaster University completing a Masters degree in clastic sedimentology under the supervision of Dr. R.G. Walker. This thesis involved the evaluation of the sedimentology, petro graphy, and paleocurrents associated with an upper Cretaceous storm dominated delta - shoreline sequence which outcrops along the eastern margin of the Cordillera.

January 1980 to January 1981 Employer: Self employed withown consulting com pany

During this time I worked as a consulting wellsite geologist in the Peace River Arch and Grande Prairie areas of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Clients during that time included Gulf Canada, Union Oil, and Kaiser Resources. Also, during spring breakup and periods of slow oilfield activity, I conducted a small exploration program on several gold claims which I owned in Northern Ontario. To accomplish this I incorporated a private Alberta corporation, and con ducted geological and geophysical surveys and some shallow diamond drilling on the various prospects.

August 1978 to January 1980 Employer: Union Oil of Canada After graduation, I was hired by Union Oil as an

exploration geologist in the Foothills Exploration Group. During that time I completed several facies and porosity mapping projects on Triassic Baldonnell, and Halfway Forma tions of northwestern British Columbia. In addition, regional mapping projects on the Cadomin, Nikannassin, and Cardium Formations were undertaken in the Deep Basin south of Grande Prairie, Alberta.

During the summer of 1979, I managed a field office out of Grande Prairie and was responsible for organizing and coor dinating the geologic aspects of a major four rig drilling program which was targeted at the Cretaceous strata in that area.

May 1978^to August 1978 Employer: Self-employedDuring this timeI conducted a prospecting and explora

tion program on a number of gold claims which I owned in northwestern Ontario and a uranium prospect which I had?' staked in the Great Bear Lake are of NWT. Work involved geological mapping and scintallometer prospecting.

May 1977 to September 1977 Employer: Trigg Woollett -& -• .Associates

May 1976 to September 1976 Employer: as aboveDuring these two summers, I was employed as a senior

geologic assistant on a uranium prospect in the Hornby Basin of the NWT which was owned by Esso Minerals and operated by Trigg Woollett & Associates. .Duties involved transit-tape surveying, diamond drill supervision, core logging, VLF and magnetometer surveying, geological mapping, and claimstaking.

May 1975 to September 1973 Employer: Saskatchewan Departmentof Mineral Resources Precambrian Mapping Group

I was employed as a geological assistant to the chief geologist, Dr. R. Macdonald. Most of the work involved air craft and helicopter supported geologic compilation mapping in the LaRonge - Pelican Narrows - Flin Flon area, and was specifically directed at the Archaen Missi-Amisk volcanic- sedimentary sequence.

ReferencesT7

3.

Dr. R.G. Walker Department of Geology McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario

Dr. R.M. BriggsVice President, ExplorationUnion Oil Canada Ltd.

Mr. Ernie SpurgeonVice President, ExplorationMurphy Oil Canada Ltd.1700 800 6th Avenue S.W,Calgary, Alberta

335 8th Avenue S.W.Calgary, Alberta

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No <£ 7//3

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Assessor

Date

19S4 09 04 Your File: 135 Our File: 2.7113

Mrs. Mary Ellen Lemay Mining Recorder (Acting) Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5080 Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9

Dear Madam:

Vie have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claim K 728588 1n the Township of Rowan Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchWhltney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barr:me

cc: Alex M. Rosenthal Box 711Ear Falls, Ontario POV 1TO

September 20, 1984 File: 2.7113

Alex M. Rosenthal Box 711Ear Falls, Ontario POV 1TO

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted on Mining Claim K 728588 In the Area of Rowan Lake

Enclosed Is the plan, 1n duplicate, for the above-mentioned survey. In order to complete your submission please provide:

1) the actual raw data readings plotted at each -- station on the plans

2) the signature of the author of the report on c all plans

3) a brief resume of the qualifications of Hr. Lome / Rosenthal for our records

For further Information, please contact Dennis Klnvlg at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whltney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

D. K1nv1g:mc

cc: Lome Rosenthal1652 Westmoont Road NW Calgary, Alberta T2N 3M1

Encl.

cc: Mining Recorder i Kenora, Ontario

File: 135-84