vkmppt competitive inhibition

Upload: vinodkumarmishra

Post on 08-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    1/13

    Example of Competitive Inhibition

    Example 1: Malonate competive inhibitor of

    succinate dehydrogenase enzyme

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    2/13

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    3/13

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    4/13

    Examples2: Competitive Inhibition-Sulpha drugs

    Sulfonamides, as antimetabolites, compete

    with para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) for

    incorporation into folic acid.

    The action of sulfonamides illustrates the

    principle of selective toxicity where some

    difference between mammal cells andbacterial cells is exploited.

    All cells require folic acid for growth. Folic

    acid (as a vitamin is in food) diffuses or is

    transported into human cells. However, folic

    acid cannot cross bacterial cell walls by

    diffusion or active transport. For this reasonbacteria must synthesize folic acid from p-

    aminobenzoic acid.

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    5/13

    Competitive Inhibition

    DHPS

    DHPS

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    6/13

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    7/13

    Uncompetitive Inhibition

    Def: Degree of inhibition (i) increases as substrate conc. is increased

    In uncompetitive inhibition, inhibitor binds to [ES] rather than free enzyme

    scheme

    Conformational change: Substrate binding causes conformational change

    that expose hidden site for inhibitor binding

    The inhibitor affects catalytic function of the enzyme but not the

    substrate binding: It appears that substrate binding is favoured in the presence ofcompetitive inhibitor. The removal of ES from equilibria favours more substrate binding

    Effect of inhibition can not be overcome by increasing

    substrate concentration

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    8/13

    Uncompetitive Inhibition

    Graph

    Consequences of lowered Km

    1. Saturation occurs at lower substrateconcentration

    2. Vm/Km is unaffected

    3. Velocity at low substrate conc is unaffected

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    9/13

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    10/13

    Uncompetitive Inhibition

    L.B. Plot

    Secondary Plots

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    11/13

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    12/13

    Classical Non-competitive Inhibition

    Degree of Inhibition (i)

    -Degree of inhibition is unaffected by substrate concentration. In other

    words, fractional inhibition is identical at all concentration, i.e. inhibition is

    found at both lower as well as higher substrate concentration

    No effect on substrate binding

    -A classical non competitive inhibitor has no effect

    on substrate binding.

    Binding site for inhibitor is other than substratebinding site

    -this inhibition is called non-competitive because inhibitor

    binding is not at the active site like competitive inhibitor. So to

    differentiate this, term non-competitive inhibition is given

  • 8/7/2019 Vkmppt Competitive Inhibition

    13/13

    Scheme for classical or pure noncompetitive inhibition

    Kinetic equation

    Effect on Kinetic parameters

    Km is unalteredVm is decreased

    Calculation of Km, Vm and Ki

    -L.B. Plot

    -Secondary plot