vii 1 resource service system
DESCRIPTION
A Conceptual Model of Service Exchange in Service-Dominant LogicGeert PoelsFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent UniversityTRANSCRIPT
AConceptualModelofServiceExchangeinService‐DominantLogic
GeertPoelsFacultyofEconomicsandBusinessAdministraBon,GhentUniversity
19‐2‐2010 1IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Outline
• Service‐DominantLogic• ServiceSystem
• Servicesystemmodelling=businessmodelling
• TheResource‐Event‐Agentconceptualmodel
• TheResource‐Service‐Systemconceptualmodel
• Openissues,challenges,futureresearch
19‐2‐2010 2IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Service‐DominantLogic• Service‐DominantLogic(Vargo&Lusch)‘’ServiceScienceembracestheworldviewoftheservice‐dominantlogic.’’(CambridgeSSMEsymposium,July2007)
• Mainideas– ServiceistheapplicaBonofcompetences(skills,knowledge)forthe
benefitofanotherparty– Alleconomicexchangesareserviceexchanges:serviceisexchanged
forserviceonthebasisofvoluntaryeconomicreciprocity– Goodsareinvolvedinthisprocessasappliancesforserviceprovision:
theyareconveyorsofcompetences– SDLrepresentsashi\inthinkingaboutvalueintermsof
• Operandresources(‘D‐resources’):passiveresourcesthatrequireacBontomakethemvaluable
to• Operantresources(‘T‐resources’):acBveresourcesthatembodycompetences
andthatcanactonotherresourcestomakethemvaluable
19‐2‐2010 3IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Comparingthe‘new’and‘old’logics
• Goods‐DominantLogic– Servicesareseenasunits
ofoutput– Valueinexchange:valueis
createdthroughtransferofresources
– Onepartyproducestheservicesandanotherpartyconsumestheservices
• Service‐DominantLogic– Serviceisseenasaprocess– Valueinuse:valueis
createdthroughresourcesacBnguponotherresources
– EachpartybringsinormakesaccessibleitsownresourcesandbothparBesco‐createvaluefortheservicebeneficiary
Service‐DominantLogicrepresentsashi<inlogicofexchange,notjustashi<intypeofproductthatisunderinvesCgaCon.
19‐2‐2010 4IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
ServiceSystem
• DefiniBon(Maglio,Vargo,Caswell,Spohrer)‘’anopensystem(1)capableofimprovingthestateofanothersystemthroughsharingorapplyingitsresources(i.e.,theothersystemdeterminesandagreesthattheinteracBonhasvalue),and(2)capableofimprovingitsownstatebyacquiringexternalresources(i.e.,thesystemitselfseesvalueinitsinteracBonwithothersystems)’’
19‐2‐2010 5IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
• KeycharacterisBcs– AservicesystemisaconfiguraBonofresources,ofwhichatleastoneoperantresource• physicalresourceswithlegalrights(people)• conceptualresourceswithlegalrights(organizaBons)• conceptualresourcestreatedasproperty(sharedinformaBon)• physicalresourcestreatedasproperty(technology)
– ServiceistheapplicaBonorsharingofresourcesforthebenefitofanothersystem• Atleastoneoperantresourcethatembodiescompetencesisappliedorshared
– ServiceentailsaninteracBonwithanotherservicesystem• Serviceisco‐creaBonofvalueratherthanproducBonbyoneparty• Theotherpartyneedstobringinormakeaccessibleitsresources
– ThereisaneconomicmoBveforservicesystemstointeract• Aserviceleadstoanotherservicethatbenefitstheservicesystem
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 6
Servicesystemmodelling=businessmodelling
• Service‐DominantLogicassumesaneconomiccontextforserviceexchanges– Enterprisesareamajorcategoryofservicesystem– Thebusinesslogicofanenterpriseisexpressedinabusinessmodel
→modellinganenterpriseasaservicesystem,emphasizingtheapplicaBonofitsresourcesforthebenefitofanothersysteminthecontextofeconomicexchange,isbusinessmodelling
• Businessmodellingknowledgehasbeenspecifiedandformalizedinbusinessmodelontologies,whichofferconceptsintermsofwhichbusinessmodelscanbearBculated
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 7
REAtakesaGoods‐DominantLogicperspecCveoneconomicexchangeasservicesareasubtypeofEconomicResource
• Servicesareeconomicresourcesthatcanbetransferred,i.e.controlovertheservicescanbetransferedfromonepersontoanother.
• Theprovider‘produces’theservices(i.e.createsvalue)andthereceiver‘consumes’theservices(i.e.destroysvalue)
• Thevalueoftheservicesisdeterminedthroughtheeconomicexchange,usuallyintermsofwhatisbeingpaidforthem
• Tomodelthetransferaneconomiceventisneeded,e.g.aservicestransfer,provisionordeliveryevent.
Resource‐Event‐AgentModel
19‐2‐2010 8IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Example:acarchangeoilservice
Economicresources Economicevent Economicagents
19‐2‐2010 9IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 10
Resource‐Service‐SystemModel(1)
InaService‐DominantLogicinterpretaConofREA,servicemapstoeconomicevent,nottoeconomicresource
19‐2‐2010 11IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
BasicResource/Service/SystemConstellaCon
Examplerevisitedagain
OperandResources Service Servicesystems
OperantResource
19‐2‐2010 12IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Resource‐Service‐SystemModel(2)
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 13
ServiceExchangeView
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 14
Resource‐Service‐SystemModel(3)
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 15
ServiceSystemComposiConView
Resource‐Service‐SystemModel(4)
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 16
ServiceAccountabilityView
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 17
Futureresearch
• Extendconceptualmodeltoaccommodate– Processstructureofservice:servicelifecyclemodel
– Service(system)componentstructure:servicecomposiBonmodel
• ModeltesBng
• Ontologydevelopment
• Ontologyalignment
19‐2‐2010 18IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Auxiliaryslides
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 19
MoBvaBon–ServiceScience
• New,disBnctfieldbasedonaninterdisciplinaryapproachtoresearch
• IniBaBvelaunchedin2004byIBM,intendingtointegrateseparateserviceresearchareas
• DefiniBons(Maglioetal.)– ‘’ServicescienceisthestudyoftheapplicaBonoftheresourcesofoneormoresystemsforthebenefitofanothersystemineconomicexchange.’’
– ‘’NormaCveservicescienceisthestudyofhowonesystemcanandshouldapplyitsresourcesforthemutualbenefitofanothersystemandofthesystemitself.’’
– ‘’Servicescience,management,andengineering(SSME)istheapplicaBonofnormaBveservicescience.’’
19‐2‐2010 20IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
PRINCIPLES:‐ServicesystemsinteracCnginaservicetakeonproviderorclientroles‐TheprovidertakesresponsibilityfortransformingoroperaCngonaservicetargetthatisownedbytheclient‐TheinteracConofbothsystemsisrequiredtocreatevaluefortheclient19‐2‐2010 21IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Theneedformodellingservicesystems
• ModelinghelpsstudyingservicesystemsandtheirinteracBons
• ArecommendaBonforresearchmadeattheCambridgeSSMEsymposium(July2007)– ‘’createmodellingandsimulaBontoolsforservicesystems’’
• AchallengeforServiceScienceresearch– ‘’Chiefamongthechallengesthatlayaheadisthechallengeofdevelopingasharedvocabularythatcanbeusedacrossdisciplinestodescribethegreatvarietyofservicesystems.’’
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 22
Theneedformodellingservicesystems–citaBonsfromServiceScienceliterature
• ‘’somedayservicescienBstsmayworkwithformalmodelsofservicesystems”
• “ModelsandanalyBcalmethodsforservicesystemswillallowustofindopportuniBesforefficiencygainsandtocreatenewinformaBon‐basedservices.”
• ‘’understandingserviceandserviceinnovaBonrequiresnewwaysofthinking(worldviewsorlogics)andnewabstracBons’’
• ‘’Perhapsmorethananyothersubjects,advancementinServiceSciencedependsonmodelsandsimulaBonsofalternaBveservicesystemsdesigns.’’
• “FormalrepresentaBonandmeasurementofworkinservicesystemsisagrandchallengefortheserviceseconomy”
19‐2‐2010 23IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
IndependentviewREAmodel
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 24
REA‐Basedserviceontologies
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 25
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 26
Examplerevisited
FoundaBonalOntologyforServiceScience
• ‘’ItseemslegiBmatetoassumethatgoodsareobjects(endurants,inDOLCE’sterms),whileservicesareevents(perdurants)’’
⇒ ConformwithService‐DominantLogic(‘serviceasaprocess’)
⇒ Aserviceisnottransferable⇒ ThedisBncBonbetweenaserviceeconomicresourceandaservice(transfer)economiceventisnotsupported
19‐2‐2010 27IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010
Resource‐Service‐SystemModel(5)
19‐2‐2010 IESS1.0Geneva17‐19February2010 28
ServiceProcessView