web viewyou will achieve 2 gcses in english. ... this question tests the ability to identify...
TRANSCRIPT
Churchill Academy
Guide to the WJEC 2015 – 2017 Specifications
WJEC – Language Exam only course
WJEC – Literature Exam only course
English WJEC Language and Literature GCSE at a glance guideYou will achieve 2 GCSEs in English. You have no coursework. Everything you learn over the two years will be
assessed by exams at the end of the two years.
Paper One Language
Reading Section A Writing Section B
1 hour 45 minutes in total40% of the language GCSE
20%One fiction text to read (extract from a piece of 20th Century Literature)5 questions to answerTime recommended:10 minutes reading50 minutes answering questions40 marks
20%One fiction writing task -Creative writingTime recommended:10 minutes planning35 minutes writing40 marks
Paper Two Language
Reading Section A Writing Section B
2 hours in total60% of the Language GCSE
30%Two non-fiction texts to read (approx. one A4 size)6 questions to answer2 questions linking to each article2 comparative questionsTime recommended:10 minutes reading50 minutes answering questions40 marks
30%Two non-fiction writing tasks (e.g, write a letter, report, interview etc for a specific purpose, audience and format)Time recommended:30 minutes per writing task5 minutes planning25 minutes writingYou must answer both questions40 marks
Paper One Literature
Section A Shakespeare Section B Poetry from 1789 to present day
2 hours40% of overall Literature GCSE
Romeo and JulietTwo QuestionsClosed book exam (no copies allowed in the exam)One extract questionOne essay question40 marks
Poetry AnthologyTwo QuestionsOne question on a specific poemOne question to compare the specified poem with a poem of your choice from the anthology40 marks
Paper Two Literature
Section A: 1914 onwards prose (fiction) or drama 20%
Section B: 19th Century Prose 20%
Section C: Unseen Poetry 20%
2 hours 30 minutes60% of overall Literature GCSE
Lord of the Flies or An Inspector CallsClosed book exam (no copies allowed in the exam)One questionExtract question and knowledge of the text40 marks
A Christmas CarolClosed book exam (no copies allowed in the exam)One questionExtract question and knowledge of the text40 marks
Two previously unseen poemsTwo questionsQuestion one: Essay on poem oneQuestion two: Comparative essay on poem one and the second unseen poem40 marks
WJEC English Language: Exam based only 2015 – 2017
You will sit 2 exams for the Language GCSE
Exam Paper One = 40% overall grade (Component 1) Time – 1 hour 45 minutes
The exam board recommends that you should spend the following time on each section: Section A - about 10 minutes reading-about 50 minutes answering the questions
Section B - about 10 minutes planning-about 35 minutes writing
The paper is split into Section A (Reading skills 20%) and Section B (Writing Skills 20%)
Section A: One extract of writing from 20th Century Literature with 5 different questions to answer within this section (40 marks)
Section B: Creative Writing task. You will be given a selection of 4 questions to select from and will only have to complete one of these tasks writing a story between 450 – 600 words (40 marks)
Paper One - Section A broken down:
The exam will ask you to answer specific questions based on your understanding of the text: These questions will be based on specific parts of the text (you should read the paper very carefully to ensure you are answering about the relevant piece of text).
A1: Selecting information from the text and compiling a bullet point list of the information (5 mark question) Examines AO1 (1a & 1b)
A2: Comment on the way the writer has used language for effect (5 marks) examines AO2 (1a & 1c)
A3 – Give understanding of implicit and explicit meaning in the text with quotations (10 marks) Examines AO2 (1a, 1c & 1d)
A4 – Show understanding of how a writer builds tension and drama in a text must use quotations (10 marks) Examines AO2 (1a, 1b, 1c & 1d)
A5 – A statement is given and you have to decide how far you agree with or disagree with the statement based on your understanding of the text you must support with evidence from the text ( quotes) (10 marks) Examines A04
Section B: As before – Creative writing task. (40 marks) Examines (all writing objectives)
Exam Total 40% for section A & B
AO1% A02% AO3% A04%
Paper One SECTION A READING
2.5%QuestionA1 (1a, 1b)
12.5%QuestionsA2 (1a, 1c)A3 (1a, 1c, 1d)A4 (1a, 1b, 1c, 1d)
0% - not assessed in this paper
5%QuestionA5(Single element AO)
What this means?
1a = identify explicit information1b = identify explicit ideas
1a =Comment on language using correct terminology1b = Comment on, explain and analyse structure using terminology1c = Comment on, explain and analyse writer effects using terminology1d = Comment on, explain and analyse how writer’s influence the reader using terminology
Evaluate texts critically, supporting with evidence (quotes from the text)
A05% A06%
Paper OneSECTION BWRITING
12%B1 (1a, 1b, 1c,) (2a, 2b, 2c)
8%B1 (single element AO)
What this means?
1a = Write for different PAF1b = communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively1c = Select and adapt tone, style and register2a = Organise information and ideas2b = Use structural and grammatical features2c = Write to support coherence and cohesion of texts
Use a range of sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling and punctuation (SPAG)
Reading Grid mark Schemes A1 Mark Scheme: 1a = identify explicit information
This question tests the ability to identify explicit and implicit information and ideas.Award one mark for each separate point identified by the candidate, to a maximum of five:No mark should be awarded for unabridged quotation of whole sentences
No Specific grade boundaries just suggested answers for this question.
Reading response A2 (AO2 1a and 1c)1a =Comment on language using correct terminology1c = Comment on, explain and analyse writer effects using terminology5 Marks accurate and perceptive comments
analyse how language and tone are used to achieve effects Subtleties of the writer’s technique are explored in relation to how the reader is
influenced. Well-considered, accurate use of subject terminology supports comments effectively
4 Marks make accurate comments begin to analyse how language and tone are used to achieve effects Subject terminology is used accurately to support comments effectively.
3 Marks Explanations made about how language is used to achieve effects and influence the reader
begin to show some understanding of language These responses will begin to use relevant subject terminology accurately to support their comments.
2 Marks identify and give straightforward comments simply identify language for effect some subject terminology.
1 Mark identify and begin to comment0 Marks Nothing worth of credit
Reading Response A3 (AO2 1a, c and d)1a =Comment on language using correct terminology1c = Comment on, explain and analyse writer effects using terminology1d = Comment on, explain and analyse how writer’s influence the reader using terminology9-10 Marks make accurate and perceptive comments on a wide range of examples about the text and
relating to the question provide detailed analysis of how language and tone are used to achieve effects and
influence the reader subtleties of the writer’s technique are explored in relation to how the reader is
influenced well-considered, accurate use of subject terminology supports comments effectively.
7-8 Marks makes accurate comments about the text relating to the question begin to analyse how language and tone are used to achieve effects
and influence the reader subject terminology is used accurately to support comments effectively.
5 – 6 Marks explain the text relating to the question begin to show some understanding of how language is used to achieve effects and influence
the reader responses will begin to use relevant subject terminology accurately to support comments.
3 -4 Marks identify and give straightforward comments on the text relating to the question simply identify some subject terminology
1 – 2 Marks identify and begin to comment on some aspects of the text relating to the question0 Marks Nothing worthy of credit
Reading response A4 (AO2 1a, b, c and d)
1a =Comment on language using correct terminology1b = Comment on, explain and analyse structure using terminology1c = Comment on, explain and analyse writer effects using terminology1d = Comment on, explain and analyse how writer’s influence the reader using terminology
9 – 10 make accurate and perceptive comments about how a wide range of different examples create tension and drama
provide detailed analysis of how language and the organisation of events are used to achieve effects and influence the reader
subtleties of the writer’s technique are explored in relation to how the reader is influenced
Well-considered, accurate use of subject terminology supports comments effectively.
7-8 Marks make accurate comments about how a range of different examples create tension and drama,
begin to analyse how language and the organisation of events are used to achieve effects and influence the reader,
subject terminology is used accurately to support comments effectively.
5-6 Marks explain how a number of different examples create tension and drama, begin to show some understanding of how language and the organisation of events
are used to achieve effects and influence the reader responses will begin to use relevant subject terminology accurately to support their
comments.
3-4 Marks identify and give straightforward comments on some examples of tension or drama responses will simply identify some subject terminology.
1-2 Marks identify and begin to comment on some examples of tension or drama in the text
Reading response A5 (AO4)Evaluate texts critically, supporting with evidence (quotes from the text)9 – 10 Marks give a persuasive evaluation of the text and its effects, supported by
convincing, well selected examples and purposeful textual references. responses will show engagement and involvement, where candidates take
an overview to make accurate and perceptive comments on the text7-8 Marks give a critical evaluation of the text and its effects, supported by well-selected
textual references. show critical awareness and clear engagement with the text
5-6 Marks give an evaluation of the text and its effects, supported by appropriate textual references.
show some critical awareness of the text3-4 Marks give a personal opinion supported by straightforward textual references.
show limited interaction with the text1-2 Marks express a simple personal opinion with linked basic textual reference0 Marks Nothing worthy of credit
Creative Writing Mark Scheme – AO5 & AO6AO5 Communication and organisation 24 marks AO6 Vocabulary, sentence structure, spelling and
punctuation 16 marksBand 5
20-24 marks the writing is fully coherent and controlled
(plot and characterisation are developed with detail, originality and imagination)
the writing is clearly and imaginatively organised (narrative is sophisticated and fully engages the reader’s interest)
structure and grammatical features are used ambitiously to give the writing cohesion and coherence
communication is ambitious and consistently conveys precise meaning
14-16 marks there is appropriate and effective variation of
sentence structures virtually all sentence construction is
controlled and accurate a range of punctuation is used confidently
and accurately virtually all spelling, including that of complex
irregular words, is correct control of tense and agreement is totally
secure a wide range of appropriate, ambitious
vocabulary is used to create effect or convey precise meaning
Band 4
15-19 marks the writing is clearly controlled and coherent
(plot and characterisation show convincing detail and some originality and imagination )
the writing is clearly organised (narrative is purposefully shaped and developed)
structure and grammatical features are used accurately to support cohesion and coherence
communication shows some ambition and conveys precise meaning
11-13 marks sentence structure is varied to achieve
particular effects control of sentence construction is secure a range of punctuation is used accurately spelling, including that of irregular words, is
secure control of tense and agreement is secure
vocabulary is ambitious and used with precision
Band 3
10-14 marks the writing is mostly controlled and coherent
(plot and characterisation show some detail and development)
the writing is organised (narrative has shape and direction)
structure and grammatical features are used with some accuracy to convey meaning
communication is clear but limited in ambition
7-10 marks there is variety in sentence structure control of sentence construction is mostly
secure a range of punctuation is used, mostly
accurately most spelling, including that of irregular
words, is correct control of tense and agreement is mostly
secure vocabulary is beginning to develop and is
used with some precisionBand 5-9 marks
there is some control and coherence (some control of plot and characterisation)
there is some organisation (narrative is beginning to have some shape and development)
structure and grammatical features are used to convey meaning
communication is limited but clear
4-6 marks some variety of sentence structure there is some control of sentence
construction some control of a range of punctuation the spelling is usually accurate control of tense and agreement is generally
secure there is some range of vocabulary
Band 1
1-4 marks there is basic control and coherence (a
basic sense of plot and characterisation) there is basic organisation (paragraphs may be used to show obvious divisions)
there is some use of structure and grammatical features to convey meaning
communication is limited but some meaning is conveyed
1-3 marks limited range of sentence structure control of sentence construction is limited there is some attempt to use punctuation some spelling is accurate control of tense and agreement is limited limited range of vocabulary
0 marks: nothing worthy of credit 0 marks: nothing worthy of credit
Exam Paper Two – 60% overall grade (Component 2) Time – 2 Hours
The exam board recommends that you should spend the following time on each section: Section A - about 10 minutes reading-about 50 minutes answering the questions
Section B - about 30 minutes on each question-about 5 minutes planning-about 25 minutes writing
The paper is split into Section A (Reading skills 20%) and Section B (Writing Skills 20%)
Section A: Two extracts from a non-fiction text with a total of 6 different questions to answer
Section B: You will have two written tasks. These will be selected from a variety of different purpose, audience and formats and you will have to write for the appropriate PAF in each task.
Paper Two Broken down: Section A
Text 1 – A1 & A2
A1 = 3 questions selecting information from one of the articles (3 marks) Examines (AO1 1a)
A2 = Selecting evidence to show how language, tone, writers’ influence and arguments are made. USE PEA skills here. (10 marks) Examines (AO2 1a, b, c & d)
Text 2 – A3 & A4
A3 = 2 questions – both question are comprehension style question assessing your ability to understand meaning in a text (3 marks) Examines (AO1 1a, 1b, 1c & 1d)
A4 = You should select evidence to explain what the writers’ views are (10 marks) Examines (AO4)
Text 1 and 2 – A5 & A6
A5 = You must look at evidence from both texts now. Comprehension questions to check understanding (4 marks) Examines (AO1 2a, 2b)
A6 = Compare attitudes across the two texts using evidence and clearly referring to which text you are writing about (10 marks) Examines (AO3 1a, 1b, 1c & 1d)
SECTION B – Two non-fiction based tasks As above (20 marks per question) Examines (all writing objectives)
Exam Total 60% for Section A & B
AO1% AO2% AO3% AO4%
Paper Two SECTION A READING30%
7.5%Questions:A1 (1a,)A3 (1a, 1b, 1c & 1d)A5 (2a, 2b)
7.5%Questions:A2 (1a, 1b, 1c & 1d)
7.5%Questions:A6 (1a, 1b, 1c & 1d)
7.5%Questions:A4(Single element AO)
What this means? 1a = identify explicit information1b = identify explicit ideas1c = interpret implicit information1d = Interpret implicit ideas2a = Select evidence from different texts2b = Synthesise evidence from different texts
1a =Comment on language using correct terminology1b = Comment on, explain and analyse structure using terminology1c = Comment on, explain and analyse writer effects using terminology1d = Comment on, explain and analyse how writer’s influence the reader using terminology
All of these compare across two or more texts:1a) compare writers’ ideas1b) Compare writers’ perspectives1c) Compare writers’ ideas and how these are conveyed1d) Compare writers’ perspectives and how these are conveyed
Evaluate texts critically, supporting with evidence (quotes from the text)
AO5 AO6Paper OneSECTION BWRITING30%
18%Questions:B1 (1a, 1b, & 1c)B2 (2a, 2b & 2c)
12%Questions:B1 & B2
Writing skills are all examined in both questions for the writing
What this means? 1a = Write for different PAF1b = communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively1c = Select and adapt tone, style and register2a = Organise information and ideas2b = Use structural and grammatical features2c = Write to support coherence and cohesion of texts
Use a range of sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling and punctuation (SPAG)
A1 - (AO1 1a)This question tests the ability to identify explicit information.
Three specific comprehension questions with answers
No mark scheme grid
A2 (AO2 1a, b, c and d)1a = identify explicit information1b = identify explicit ideas1c = interpret implicit information1d = Interpret implicit ideasBand 19 – 10 marks
make accurate and perceptive comments about how a wide range of different examples from the text relating to the question
provide detailed analysis of how language and structure are used to achieve effects and influence the reader
Subtleties of the writer’s technique are explored in relation to how the reader is influenced.
Well-considered, accurate use of subject terminology supports comments effectively.
Band 27 – 8 marks
make accurate comments about how a range of different examples from the text relating to the question
begin to analyse how language and structure are used to achieve effects and influence the reader
Subject terminology is used accurately to support comments effectively.Band 35 – 6 marks
explain how a number of different examples from the text relating to the question begin to show some understanding of how language and structure are used to
achieve effects and influence the reader use relevant subject terminology accurately to support their comments
Band 2 3 -4 marks
identify and give straightforward comments on some examples from the text relating to the question
simply identify some subject terminology.
Band 11-2 marks
identify and begin to comment on some examples from the text relating to the question
may struggle to engage with the text and/or the question.
A3 (AO1 1a, b, c and d)
1a = identify explicit information 1b = identify explicit ideas1c = interpret implicit information 1d = Interpret implicit ideas
Three specific comprehension questions with answers
No mark scheme grid
Explanation of the phrase and how it links to language is needed “it is a metaphor” wouldn’t achieve any marks.
A4 AO4Evaluate texts critically, supporting with evidence (quotes from the text)Band 59 – 10 marks
give a persuasive evaluation of the text and its effects,supported by convincing, well-selected examples and purposeful textual references.
responses will show engagement and involvement, where candidates take an overview to
make accurate and perceptive comments on views in the textBand 47 – 8 marks
give a critical evaluation of the text and its effects, supported by well-selected textual references.
show critical awareness and clear engagement with views in the textBand 35 – 6 marks
give an evaluation of the text and its effects, supported by appropriate textual references. responses will show some critical awareness of views in the text
Band 23 – 4 marks
give a personal opinion supported by straightforward textual references responses will show limited interaction with views in the text
Band 11 – 2 marks
express a simple personal opinion with linked basic textual reference struggle to engage with the text and/or the question
A5 (AO1 2a and b)2a = Select evidence from different texts2b = Synthesise evidence from different texts4 marks synthesise with clear understanding and provide an overview drawn from a range of
relevant detail from both texts3 marks synthesise with some understanding a range of relevant detail from both texts2 marks select a range of relevant detail from both texts1 mark make some selection of relevant detail from both texts.A6 AO3All of these compare across two or more texts:1a) compare writers’ ideas1b) Compare writers’ perspectives1c) Compare writers’ ideas and how these are conveyed1d) Compare writers’ perspectives and how these are conveyedBand 19 – 10 marks
make comparisons that are sustained and detailed, showing clear understanding of how they are conveyed
Band 27 – 8 marks
make detailed comparisons, with valid comments on how they are conveyed,
Band 35 – 6 marks
identify similarities and differences and make some comparisons, commenting on how they are conveyed
Band 23 – 4 marks
identify and give a straightforward description of some of the main similarities and differences
Band 11 -2 marks
identify basic similarities and / or differences
Component 2 Writing Mark Scheme – Transactional Writing (x 2 tasks)AO5: Communication and organisation AO6: Spelling, punctuation, vocabulary and sentence
structuresBand 5 11-12 marks
shows sophisticated understanding of the purpose and format of the task
shows sustained awareness of the reader / intended audience
appropriate register is confidently adapted to purpose / audience
content is ambitious, pertinent and sophisticated ideas are convincingly developed and supported by a
range of relevant details there is sophistication in the shape and structure of the
writing communication has ambition and sophistication
8 marks there is appropriate and effective variation of sentence
structures virtually all sentence construction is controlled and accurate a range of punctuation is used confidently and accurately virtually all spelling, including that of complex irregular words, is
correct control of tense and agreement is totally secure a wide range of appropriate, ambitious vocabulary is used to
create effect or convey precise meaning
Band 4 8-10 marks shows consistent understanding of the purpose and
format of the task shows secure awareness of the reader/intended
audience register is appropriately and consistently adapted to
purpose/audience content is well-judged and detailed ideas are organised and coherently developed with
supporting detail there is clear shape and structure in the writing
(paragraphs are used effectively to give sequence and organisation)
communication has clarity, fluency and some ambition
6-7 marks sentence structure is varied to achieve particular effects control of sentence construction is secure a range of punctuation is used accurately spelling, including that of irregular words, is secure control of tense and agreement is secure vocabulary is ambitious and used with precision
Band 3 5-7 marks shows clear understanding of the purpose and format
of the task shows clear awareness of the reader / intended
audience register is appropriately adapted to purpose / audience content is developed and appropriate reasons are given
in support of opinions / ideas ideas are organised into coherent arguments there is some shape and structure in the writing
(paragraphs are used to give sequence and organisation)
communication has clarity and fluency
4-5 marks there is variety in sentence structure control of sentence construction is mostly secure a range of punctuation is used, mostly accurately most spelling, including that of irregular words, is correct control of tense and agreement is mostly secure vocabulary is beginning to develop and is used with some
precision
Band 2 -4 marks shows some awareness of the purpose and format of
the task shows awareness of the reader / intended audience a clear attempt to adapt register to purpose / audience some reasons are given in support of opinions and ideas limited development of ideas some sequencing of ideas into paragraphs (structure /
direction may be uncertain) communication has some clarity and fluency
2-3 marks some variety of sentence structure there is some control of sentence construction some control of a range of punctuation the spelling is usually accurate control of tense and agreement is generally secure there is some range of vocabulary
Band 1 1-2 marks basic awareness of the purpose and format of the task some basic awareness of the reader / intended
audience some attempt to adapt register to purpose / audience
(e.g. degree of formality) some relevant content despite uneven coverage of the
topic content may be thin and brief simple sequencing of ideas (paragraphs may be used to
show obvious divisions or group ideas into some order) there is some basic clarity but communication of
meaning is limited
1 mark limited range of sentence structure control of sentence construction is limited there is some attempt to use punctuation some spelling is accurate control of tense and agreement is limited limited range of vocabulary
WJEC English Literature: Exam based only 2015 – 2017
You will sit 2 exams for the Literature GCSE
Exam Paper One = 40% overall grade (Component 1) Time – 2 hours
The exam board recommends that you should spend the following time on each section: Section A - about 1 hourSection B - about 1 hour
The paper is split into Section A Shakespeare and Section B Poetry Anthology
Section A: One extract of text from Romeo and Juliet (15 marks) One essay question which asks you to look at the plot as a whole and analyse how a particular character/theme or event is important within the whole context (25 marks: 5 marks for spelling, punctuation, vocabulary and sentence structures).
Section B: One specified poem with a copy in the exam booklet which asks you to write a theme based essay on the poem. The second question asks you to compare the specified poem from question one to another of your choice from the anthology (no copy in the exam booklet).
Shakespeare Section a 15 marks: both AO1 and AO2 are equally weighted in this questionAO1:1a+b, AO1:2 Ao2
513_15marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the text critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the text, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the text, including quotations.
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
4 10-12 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with coherence and use an appropriate register; use a thoughtful approach to the task;
show a secure understanding of key aspects of the text, with considerable engagement;
support and justify their responses by well-chosen direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer;
use apt subject terminology.
3 7-9 marks
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task;
show an understanding of key aspects of the text, with engagement;
support and justify their responses by appropriate direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make some reference to meanings and effects; use relevant subject terminology.
2 4-6 marks
Candidates: have some focus on the task, convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key aspects
of the text, with some engagement; support and justify their responses by
some direct reference to the text, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make limited reference to meanings and effects;
may use some relevant subject terminology.
1 1-3 marks
Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register; use a simple approach to the task;
show a basic understanding of some key aspects of the text, with a little engagement;
may support and justify their responses by some general reference to the text, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make basic reference to meanings and effects;
may use some subject terminology but not always accurately
0 marks Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit
Shakespeare question b: 5 marks grade descriptor and AO1 & AO2 grade descriptorsLevel descriptor Spelling, punctuation, vocabulary and sentence structuresHigh Performance4-5 marks
In the context of the Level of Demand of the question, Learners spell and punctuate with consistent accuracy, and consistently use vocabulary and sentence structures to achieve effective control of meaning.
Intermediate performance2 -3 marks
In the context of the Level of Demand of the question, Learners spell and punctuate with considerable accuracy, and use a considerable range of vocabulary and sentence structures to achieve general control of meaning.
Threshold Performance1 mark
In the context of the Level of Demand of the question, Learners spell and punctuate with reasonable accuracy, and use a reasonable range of vocabulary and sentence structures; any errors do not hinder meaning in the response.
0 marks Candidates do not reach the threshold performance outlined in the performance descriptor above
Band AO1: 1a+b, AO1:2 AO25 17 – 20 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the text critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the text, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the text, including quotations.
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
4 13-16 marks Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with considerable coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key aspects of the text, with considerable engagement;
support and justify their responses by well-chosen direct reference to the text, including quotations
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer;
use apt subject terminology.
3 9 – 12 marks Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task; show an understanding of key aspects of the text,
with engagement; support and justify their responses by appropriate
direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make some reference to meanings and effects;
use relevant subject terminology.
2 5-8 marks Candidates: have some focus on the task, convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register; use a limited approach to the task;
show some understanding of key aspects of the text, with some engagement;
support and justify their responses by some direct reference to the text, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make limited reference to meanings and effects;
may use some relevant subject terminology.
1 1-4 marks Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some key aspects of
the text, with a little engagement; may support and justify their responses by some
general reference to the text, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make basic reference to meanings and effects;
may use some subject terminology but not always accurately.
0 marks Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit
Question A Poetry Anthology AO1, AO2 and AO3 are equally weighted across this questionAO1 AO2 AO3
Band 513 – 15 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the text critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the text, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the text, including quotations
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure, make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
Candidates: show an assured understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audience
Band 410-12 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key
aspects of the text, with considerable engagement;
support and justify their responses by well-chosen direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure, make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer; use apt subject terminology.
Candidates: show a secure understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 37-9 marks
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task;
show an understanding of key aspects of the text, with engagement;
support and justify their responses by appropriate direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure, make some reference to meanings and effects;
use relevant subject terminology.
Candidates: show an understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 24-6 marks
Candidates: have some focus on the task, convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key aspects
of the text, with some engagement; support and justify their responses by
some direct reference to the text, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure, may make limited reference to meanings and effects;
may use some relevant subject terminology.
Candidates: show some understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 11-3 marks
Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some key
aspects of the text, with a little engagement;
may support and justify their responses by some general reference to the text, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure, may make basic reference to meanings and effects;
may use some subject terminology but not always accurately.
Candidates: show limited understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
0 Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit
Question B Poetry Anthology: A01, AO2 and AO3 are equally weighted across this this questionAO1 AO2 AO3
Band 521-25 marks
Comparison is critical, illuminating and sustained across AO1, AO2 and AO3. There will be a wide ranging discussion of the similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the texts critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the texts, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the texts, including quotations.
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure, make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
Candidates: show an assured understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 416-20marks
Comparison is focussed, coherent and sustained across AO1, AO2 and AO3. There will be a clear discussion of the similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key aspects
of the texts, with considerable engagement; support and justify their responses by well-
chosen direct reference to the texts, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure, make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer;
use apt subject terminology.
Candidates: show a secure understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 311-15 marks
Comparison is focussed across AO1, AO2 and AO3 with some valid discussion of the similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task; show an understanding of key aspects of the
texts, with engagement; support and justify their responses by
appropriate direct reference to the texts, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure, make some reference to meanings and effects;
use relevant subject terminology.
Candidates: show an understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 26- 10 marks
Comparison is general with some discussion of the obvious similarities and/or differences between the poems. Candidates: have some focus on the task,
convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key aspects of
the texts, with some engagement; support and justify their responses by some
direct reference to the texts, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure, may make limited reference to meanings and effects;
may use some relevant subject terminology.
Candidates: show some understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 11 – 5 marks
Comparison is very limited. There may be a basic awareness of the obvious similarities and/or differences between the poems. Candidates: have limited focus on the task,
convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some key
aspects of the texts, with a little engagement;
may support and justify their responses by some general reference to the texts, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure, may make basic reference to meanings and effects;
may use some subject terminology but not always accurately.
Candidates: show limited understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
0 Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit
Exam Paper Two = 60% overall grade (Component 2) Time – 2 hours 30 minutes
The exam board recommends that you should spend the following time on each section: Section A - about 45 minutesSection B - about 45 minutesSection C – about 1 hour Part a – 20 minutes Part b – 40 minutes
This paper is split into Section A Post 1914 Drama/prose(fiction), Section B 19th Century prose and Section C Unseen Poetry. All are closed book exams meaning that no texts will be available in exam
Section A: Lord of the Flies for higher ability and An Inspector Calls for lower ability. One essay question is to be answered using the extract given in the exam and student knowledge of the play. (40 marks – 5 for spelling, punctuation, vocabulary and sentence structures AO4).
Section B: A Christmas Carol. One essay question is to be answered using the extract given in the exam and student knowledge of the play. (40 marks – 5 marks for spelling, punctuation, vocabulary and sentence structures AO4).
Section C – Unseen Poetry – Section a – One essay on the effects of the poem. (15 marks) Section b – A comparative essay on the meaning, language, structure and personal response to both poems. (25 marks).
Post 1914 Drama/Prose 5 marks grade descriptor and AO1 & AO2 grade descriptorsLevel descriptor
Spelling, punctuation, vocabulary and sentence structures
High Performance4-5 marks
In the context of the Level of Demand of the question, Learners spell and punctuate with consistent accuracy, and consistently use vocabulary and sentence structures to achieve effective control of meaning.
Intermediate performance2 -3 marks
In the context of the Level of Demand of the question, Learners spell and punctuate with considerable accuracy, and use a considerable range of vocabulary and sentence structures to achieve general control of meaning.
Threshold Performance1 mark
In the context of the Level of Demand of the question, Learners spell and punctuate with reasonable accuracy, and use a reasonable range of vocabulary and sentence structures; any errors do not hinder meaning in the response.
0 marks Candidates do not reach the threshold performance outlined in the performance descriptor aboveAO1 AO2
Band 529-35
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the extract and wider text critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the extract and wider text, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the extract and wider text, including quotations.
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
Band 422 – 28
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with considerable coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key aspects of the
extract and wider text, with considerable engagement;
support and justify their responses by well-chosen direct reference to the extract and wider text, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer;
use apt subject terminology.
Band 315-21
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task; show an understanding of key aspects of the extract
and wider text, with engagement; support and justify their responses by appropriate
direct reference to the extract and wider text, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make some reference to meanings and effects;
use relevant subject terminology.
Band 28-14
Candidates: have some focus on the task, convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key aspects of the
extract and wider text, with some engagement; support and justify their responses by some direct
reference to the extract and wider text, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make limited reference to meanings and effects; may use some relevant subject terminology.
Band 11-7
Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some key aspects of
the extract and wider text, with a little engagement; may support and justify their responses by some
general reference to the extract and wider text, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make basic reference to meanings and effects; may use some subject terminology but not always accurately.
Section B 19th Century Prose – AO1, AO2 and AO3 are equally weightedAO1 AO2 AO3
Band 533-40 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the extract and wider text critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the extract and wider text, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the extract and wider text, including quotations.
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
Candidates: show an assured understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 425-32 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with considerable coherence and use an appropriate register; use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key aspects of the extract and wider text, with considerable engagement; support and justify their responses by well-chosen direct reference to the extract and wider text, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer;
use apt subject terminology.
Candidates: show a secure understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 317-24 marks
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task;
show an understanding of key aspects of the extract and wider text, with engagement;
support and justify their responses by appropriate direct reference to the extract and wider text, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make some reference to meanings and effects;
use relevant subject terminology.
Candidates: show an understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 29-16 marks
Candidates: have some focus on the task, convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key
aspects of the extract and wider text, with some engagement;
support and justify their responses by some direct reference to the extract and wider text, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure; may make limited reference to meanings and effects;
may use some relevant subject terminology.
Candidates: show some understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences.
Band 11-8 marks
Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some
key aspects of the extract and wider text, with a little engagement;
may support and justify their responses by some general reference to the extract and wider text, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure; may make basic reference to meanings and effects;
may use some subject terminology but not always accurately.
Candidates: show limited understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written, including, where relevant, those of period, location, social structures and literary contexts such as genre, and the contexts in which texts are engaged with by different audiences
O marks Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit
Section A Unseen Poetry AO1 and AO2 are weighted equallyAO1 AO2
Band 513-15 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the text critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the text, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent ,direct references from across the text, including quotations
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
Band 410 – 12 marks
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key aspects of the
text, with considerable engagement; support and justify their responses by well-chosen
direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure;make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer; use apt subject terminology
Band 37-9 marks
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task; show an understanding of key aspects of the text,
with engagement; support and justify their responses by appropriate
direct reference to the text, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to evaluate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make some reference to meanings and effects; use relevant subject terminology.
Band 24-6 marks
Candidates: have some focus on the task, convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key aspects of the
text, with some engagement; support and justify their responses by some direct
reference to the text, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make limited reference to meanings and effects; may use some relevant subject terminology.
Band 11-3 marks
Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some key aspects
of the text, with a little engagement; may support and justify their responses by some
general reference to the text, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make basic reference to meanings and effects; may use some subject terminology but not always
accurately or appropriately.
0 Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit
Section B Unseen Poetry Comparative element AO1 and AO2 are weighted equally
AO1 AO2Band 521-25 marks
Comparison is critical, illuminating and sustained across AO1 and AO2. There will be a wide ranging discussion of the similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, including overview, convey ideas with consistent coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a sensitive and evaluative approach to the task and analyse the texts critically;
show a perceptive understanding of the texts, engaging fully, perhaps with some originality in their personal response;
their responses include pertinent, direct references from across the texts, including quotations.
Candidates: analyse and appreciate writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make assured reference to meanings and effects exploring and evaluating the way meaning and ideas are conveyed through language structure and form;
use precise subject terminology in an appropriate context.
Band 416-20 marks
Comparison is focussed, coherent and sustained across AO1 and AO2. There will be a clear discussion of the similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: sustain focus on the task, convey ideas with coherence and use an appropriate register;
use a thoughtful approach to the task; show a secure understanding of key
aspects of the texts, with considerable engagement;
support and justify their responses by well-chosen direct reference to the texts, including quotations.
Candidates: discuss and increasingly analyse writers’ use of language, form and structure; make thoughtful reference to the meanings and effects of stylistic features used by the writer;
use apt subject terminology.
Band 311-15 marks
Comparison is focussed across AO1 and AO2 with some valid discussion of the similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: focus on the task, convey ideas with general coherence and use a mostly appropriate register;
use a straightforward approach to the task;
show an understanding of key aspects of the texts, with engagement;
support and justify their responses by appropriate direct reference to the texts, including quotations.
Candidates: comment on and begin to evaluate writers’ use of language, form and structure; make some reference to meanings and effects;
use relevant subject terminology.
Band 26-10 marks
Comparison is general with some discussion of the obvious similarities and/or differences between the poems. Candidates: have some focus on the task,
convey ideas with some coherence and sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a limited approach to the task; show some understanding of key aspects
of the texts, with some engagement; support and justify their responses by
some direct reference to the texts, including some quotations.
Candidates: recognise and make simple comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
may make limited reference to meanings and effects; may use some relevant subject terminology.
Band 11-5 marks
Comparison is very limited. There may be a basic awareness of the obvious similarities and/or differences between the poems.
Candidates: have limited focus on the task, convey ideas with occasional coherence and may sometimes use an appropriate register;
use a simple approach to the task; show a basic understanding of some key
aspects of the texts, with a little engagement;
may support and justify their responses by some general reference to the texts, perhaps including some quotations.
Candidates: may make generalised comments on writers’ use of language, form and structure;
make basic reference to meanings and effects; may use some subject terminology but not always
accurately or appropriately.
0 Nothing worthy of credit Nothing worthy of credit