siteresources.worldbank.orgsiteresources.worldbank.org/exthsd/images/assessmenttool... · web...
TRANSCRIPT
ASSESSMENT TOOL
Based on the Model Quality Assurance System1
INSPECTION OF A PROCUREMENT AGENCY
1. MQAS. WHO TRS 937
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 1
Table of contents
1. Document history2. Introduction3. Purpose4. Scope5. Assessment tool6. Revision history
1. Document history
Action Date
Preparation of first draft May 2013
2. Introduction
The Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations of the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a Model Quality Assurance System for Procurement Agencies (MQAS) during a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland in 2005. This was subsequently published as Annex 6 in the Technical Report Series (TRS 937), in 2006.
The Global Fund Secretariat coordinated this project with the aim to prepare a harmonized assessment tool based on the World Health Organization document: Model Quality Assurance System for Procurement Agencies (MQAS); WHO guidelines on Good Storage Practices (GSP) and WHO Guidelines on Good Distribution Practices (GDP). (For current versions, see www.who.int/medicines).
This harmonized tool was developed by a working group consisting of representatives from the following organizations: QUAMED, PFSCM, UNICEF, MSF, IDA, Crown Agents, GDF, MSH, UNION, UNOPS, USAID, ICRC and CHMP.
3. PurposeThis harmonized tool was developed by the working group with the objective that it could be utilized with the aim of better use of resources by coordinating procurement agency (PA) assessments; and working towards mutual recognition of PA assessment findings.
4. Scope
The assessment tool is based on the 6 Modules in the MQAS:Module I General requirements for Procurement AgenciesModule II PrequalificationModule III PurchasingModule IV Receiving and storageModule V DistributionModule VI Re-assessment
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 2
The tool covers these topics in different modules below. The logical flow considered is the quality system and infrastructure of the PA under assessment, how the PA performed prequalification, then purchasing of the products followed by the receiving and storage thereof. The last two modules then focus on the receiving of orders and dispatch of products followed by the re-evaluation concept.
5. Assessment toolThe tool should be used by qualified, experienced persons when assessing PA (including wholesalers, distributors) for compliance with recommended international standards. It can also be useful for a PA when doing a self-assessment.
The tool is not checklist, but serves as a document to help and remind inspectors as to what should be assessed during inspections of PAs.
Module I: General requirements for Procurement Agencies
This Module covers general requirements for procurement agencies including premises, equipment, transport, and documentation (such as SOPs, confidentiality, code of conduct and complaint handling).
Area of operation
Note Critical aspects
Premises, Equipment, Furniture, Transport
General Space (offices for personnel,
products, documents, samples etc.)
Suitable conditions Necessary furniture Working office equipment Stationery and consumables Telephone and e-mail access Appropriate transport available
There must be a sufficient and functional infrastructure to enable the PA to perform its activities
Compliance with legislation (license)
Human resources
Personnel Number of people Training, education and
experience Support staff Key personnel - quality assurance,
prequalification, purchasing, storage and distribution
Compliance with national legislation (e.g. responsible person)
Quality assurance/prequalification and purchasing independent of one another
Compliance with legislation
Quality assurance/prequalification and purchasing independent of one another
Organization Job descriptions
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 3
Written job descriptions Signed and dated
Organization chart Authorized, current organization
chart In accordance with the job
descriptions
Ethical considerations
Code of conduct Designed, authorized and
implemented Covers conduct of staff All to comply with a code of
conduct
Confidentiality Relevant product information kept
confidential Confidentiality agreements
Conflict of interest Policy on conflict of interest is
observed Signed declaration of interest No vested interests
No conflict of interest and adherence to confidentiality
Computers Appropriate hardware and software Sufficient capacity and memory Reliable and accurate quality and
management information Data transfer Data kept (e.g. hard copies) Back-up at defined intervals,
storage, access, readable Virus protection programme and
firewall Technical support and
maintenance available Maintenance and upgrading plan Trained personnel
If used, reliable data management
Financial systems
National and international financial transactions
Funds available Adequate banking facilities Signatories of bank accounts
appointed Accounting system in place Regular financial audits are
performed. Financial transactions performed
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 4
without delay
Documentation Comprehensive documented system Covers policies, guidelines, norms,
standards, manuals, procedures, records and related documents
SOPs for activities
Quality manual Reflects quality policy Evidence of QM implemented,
maintained, reviewed and amended as necessary
Standard operating procedures Written, clear, detailed SOPs for
activities Quality Risk Management
principles applied SOP for writing an SOP followed SOPs are reviewed periodically
Style and layout SOPs in PA format Signed and dated Clear, unambiguous language
Activities described in SOPs which are implemented and followed
Activities to be covered by standard operating procedures
Handling of complaints Document/record control Self inspection Handling of recalls Monitoring of environmental
conditions (e.g. temperature) Monitoring supplier performance Identifying and reporting
substandard/spurious/falsely-labelled/falsified/counterfeit (SSFFC) products;
Evaluating offers received; Ordering product(s) from supplier
or manufacturer; Distribution and retrieval of SOPs Change control Variations CAPA
Written SOPs followed for complaints, recalls, handling sub-standard products, change control
List of prequalified products and manufacturers
Current, authorized, access controlled list
Based on the outcome of evaluation
Product- and manufacturing site-specific
A key person responsible
A list is maintained
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 5
The list should contains required information
Maintenance of records
Records of all operations kept Sufficient space Access restricted Retention period appropriate
Records are kept
Contract arrangements
Written contracts for delegated activities
Written agreements in place
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 6
Module II: Prequalification
Area of operation
Note Critical aspects
Principles Documented policy and procedures for prequalification
Include assessment of product and manufacturers/suppliers
If delegated - written agreement
Key persons and responsibilities
Responsible personnel identified
Independent from the purchasing personnel
Job descriptions Communication between
evaluation and inspections
Evaluation of product information (Evaluators)
List of evaluators Suitable qualifications and
experience Job descriptions Contracted external evaluators
used (confidentiality, conflicts of interest and financial resources, references)
Inspection of manufacturing sites (Inspectors)
List of inspectors Job descriptions Qualified, trained, experienced Contracted inspectors –
confidentiality and no conflict of interest
Qualified, trained personnel perform prequalification activities (including assessment and inspections)
Key steps in prequalification defined
Soliciting information Procedures for preparation of
detailed, clear specifications; soliciting information; receiving and processing of the information
Policy and procedure for handling late submissions
Record of data received Procedure for submitting
product information publicly available and accessible
Product information (as a
Evaluation of product data and information
Ensuring compliance with GMP
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 7
minimum, see product questionnaire)
Step 2: Receive product information Written procedures for
receiving, identification, marking files, containers and samples, and sufficient space for unpacking and storage
Procedure to ensure traceability of the product information
Personnel
Step 3: Screen product information SOP: Screen for completeness A screening form used Record of screening kept Communicated to supplier
Step 4: Evaluate product information Written procedure – evaluate
against requirement Time frames Patent status considered Evaluation report for each
product Outcome communicated to the
manufacturer Response invited where needed Outcome accepted or rejected Evaluation report kept as record Samples analysed if needed
(See also monitoring below)
Step 5: Plan, prepare and perform inspections
Evidence of GMP compliance Batch-to-batch consistency Site of manufacture known Site inspections Contract manufacturing sites Control over APIs (inspection
risk based)
Procedure and recording system for inspection planning
Procedure and data reviewed as part of preparation for inspection (e.g. Site master file)
Written procedure for conduct
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 8
of inspection Scope: Data and information
verified and GMP compliance assessed
If not done - conditions for waiving inspections
Inspection report Inspection report for each site
inspected Outcome communicated CAPA and review Conclusion Copy of report kept
Step 6: Finalize assessment process Written procedure followed Covers product evaluation plus
laboratory results and inspection outcome
Responsible persons (decision taking) and reasons for decision
Outcome communicated List of prequalified products
and manufacturers Agreement between PA and
supplier List reviewed and updated at
regular intervals
Monitoring Random samples of batches supplied analyzed (risk based)
Independent testing - reliable quality control laboratory
Certificates of analysis where appropriate
General analysis - access to a quality control laboratory
Status of the laboratory (e.g. authorized, accredited)
Access to raw data Handling of out-of-specification
results
Handling out of specification results
Cost recovery Transparent procedure Fee-for-services structure
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 9
Module III: Purchasing
Procurement should be done with the aim of purchasing effective, quality assured products, and not be focused on price alone. The term “procurement” in this Module relates specifically to the purchase of health sector goods from manufacturers or suppliers. The module goes on to describe the key activities in purchasing pharmaceutical products, as well as the recommended organizational structure of the procurement agencies which carry out these key activities.
Area of operation
Note Critical aspects
Procurement strategies
Strategic objectives for good pharmaceutical procurement include:
• selection of reliable suppliers of quality products;
• procurement of the most cost-effective pharmaceutical products in the right quantities and
meeting the quality standards;• mitigating possible risks;• timely delivery; • achievement of the
lowest possible total cost.
Efficient and transparent management
responsibilities; appropriate standardization, selection, specification and quantification of pharmaceutical products, monitoring
financial management procedures
competitive procurement methods
Procedure to calculate lowest possible total cost
Ensure that the following principles are applied:
prequalified products are purchased from approved manufacturers;
procurement and purchasing
Selection of reliable suppliers
Procurement of products meeting the defined quality standards
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 10
procedures are transparent; activities follow formal written
procedures throughout the process, including explicit criteria for awarding contracts;
independent contract review; purchasing is based on defined
procurement policy of the procurement agency;,
purchasing and tender documents list all pharmaceutical products by their INN or national generic names;
suppliers are selected and monitored through a process that takes into account product quality, service reliability and performance, delivery time, ethics, legal status, financial viability and minimum order quantities;
intellectual property rights are respected in accordance with best practice and national law.
Procurement methods
Responses examined from invited suppliers
Responsive to the defined terms and conditions
Informed of the outcome
Restricted tender Prequalified products and
suppliers Competitive negotiation minimum of three suppliers Prequalified products and
suppliers Direct procurement Limited use
Use a defined, transparent procurement method
Quality Assurance
QS to ensure that pharmaceutical products are of the quality required for their intended use
Quality system in place and functioning
Ensuring quality products are procured
Key activities Develop a list or catalog of products (INN)
Develop specifications for the products
Key activities are defined in SOPs that are followed
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 11
Quantification Accurate quantification of needs Quantities purchased based on
reliable estimate Methods of product
quantification
Procurement method According to their policy and
procedures
Organization and responsibilities
Personnel with appropriate qualifications and training
Established procedures Job description Independent from those
responsible for prequalification and quality assurance
Transparent, written procedures Explicit criteria for awarding
contracts Confidentiality agreement Declarations of conflict of
interest Reliable financing for
procurement Good financial management
procedures Procurement planned Procurement performance
monitored
Suitable personnel
Written procedures followed
No conflict of interest
Good procurement practices
Monitoring of the performance or prequalified suppliers
Procedure for continuous monitoring of the performance of the manufacturers and suppliers
Monitoring may include:
analysis of quality control results verification that the product
batches supplied have been manufactured in compliance with standards and specifications accepted in the product information through inspection;
pharmacovigilance; monitoring of complaints; outcome of inspection of
manufacturing sites; outcome of reassessment of
product information; monitoring of direct and indirect
Monitoring performance of manufacturers and suppliers
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 12
product costs; monitoring of adherence to
delivery schedules
contract terms and conditions.
Tracking system (values of contracts awarded, total purchases, performance)
Country legislation
Destination country’s legislation on registration/licensing
Donations Written procedure
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 13
Module IV: Receiving and storage
Area of operation
Note Critical aspects
General arrangements
Received and stored correctly Quality and integrity is preserved Batch traceability Stock rotation Unidirectional flow Security of materials and
products Access to a quality control
laboratory Subcontracting
Procedures followed for receiving and storage
Pre-shipment quality control
Batches tested by the manufacturer prior to supply to PA
Batches received meet specifications
Receiving of stock
Receiving and dispatch bays Incoming goods cleaned,
quarantined Released for use or distribution Review of COAs
Checks on receipt: Order, delivery note, labels and
transport conditions, integrity of packages and seals, and for uniformity of the containers
Visual inspection for: Contamination; tampering and
damage; expiry date, compliance with labeling, packaging instructions;
Suspect containers and damaged containers - recorded and investigated.
Goods received and checked according to an appropriate SOP
Post-procurement control
Random sampling for independent laboratory analysis
SOP and national legislation Representative samples Appropriately trained and
qualified personnel Sampling plans and instructions
(risk assessment)Rejected materials
SOP, rejected products not used Separate storage or validated
computerized system Action approved by authorized
Rejected materials kept separately, access controlled and handled appropriately
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 14
personnel and recordedStorage of materials/products
Personnel Trained Personal hygiene and sanitation Job descriptions Working garments
Storage areas
Space Segregation of rejected, expired,
recalled or returned stock Narcotics/psychotropic
medicines as per national legislation
Adequate ventilation, temperature and relative humidity
Conditions checked, monitored and recorded
No unauthorized access SOP for fire control Fire detection and fire-fighting
equipment No smoking observed Clean and free of vermin and
accumulated waste Sanitation programme Pest-control SOP for cleaning up of any
spillages
Storage conditions
As established by the manufacturer
Orderly, batch segregation, stock rotation, FEFO
Stored off the floor Spaced to permit cleaning and
inspection Pallets in a good state of
cleanliness and repair Stacking of products without
damage Storage conditions (see GSP) Freeze-sensitive products -
“freeze-watch” monitoring device
Monitoring of storage conditions
Access controlled and sufficient space
Appropriate conditions for storage
Pest control
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 15
Temperature mapping protocol and report
Calibrated sensors / devices Ongoing monitoring with records Out of limit and out of trend
results investigated
Miscellaneous and hazardous materials
Rodenticides, insecticides, fumigating agents and sanitizing materials
Toxic substances and flammable materials
Re-packaging and re-labelling
Where re-packaging or re-labelling - WHO GMP
Stock control Validated stock control system Batch number control and expiry
dating Periodic stock reconciliation
done Significant stock discrepancies
investigated Records maintained Damaged containers handled
Control of obsolete and outdated materials and products
SOP Regular checks Outdated products not issued
Recalled materials and products SOP for recalls Written records of actions with
signatures Products identified, recorded,
reconciled, and stored separately Appropriately qualified and
experienced member of staff
Returned goods SOP for returned goods Quarantined and assessed Re-sale conditions Destruction in compliance with
national requirements Records
Waste materials
Stock control in place (reconciliation, obsolete materials, recalled products, returned goods, FEFO and waste)
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 16
SOP Safe storage while awaiting
disposal Toxic substances and flammable
materials No accumulation Safe disposal, intervals, national
regulationsDocumentation: written instructions and records
SOPs activities Handling of expired stock Ensuring batch traceability Records for storage conditions,
precautions, retest dates National regulations concerning
labels and containers Retention of records Comprehensive records of all
receipts and issues of products
Record keeping ensuring traceability, receiving, issuing, expired goods etc
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 17
Module V: Distribution
The PA (or contracted party) should have a well-managed distribution system meeting the objectives of ensuring constant supply of quality medicines.
Area of operation
Note Critical aspects
General Constant supply of medicines Minimize medicines losses
(spoilage and expiry) Accurate inventory records Reduce theft and fraud Forecasting needs
Constant supply assured
Transport conditions
Transport process has no negative impact
Required storage conditions maintained
Temperature excursions - risk assessment
Appropriate transport conditions
Cold chain Special care taken where needed
Appropriate containers Packaging procedure Cooling agents used Calibrated monitoring devices Monitoring records maintained Validated process
Cold chain maintained, monitored, validated
Dispatch procedures
Procedures in place Special packaging requirements
observed where needed Dispatch and transport after
receipt of a delivery order Authorized recipients Compliance with legislation
Authorized recipients
Follow procedures
Dispatch containers
Provide protection Appropriately labeled Prevent theft (e.g.
locked/wrapped)
Suitable containers used
Dispatch records
Detailed records kept (e.g. date, customer name and address; product name and batch number and quantity)
Products and batches traceable Discrepancies investigated
Records ensure traceability of goods
Port of entry Storage conditions met Temperature-sensitive products Security measures (theft, fraud
and bribery)
Appropriate conditions ensured at port of entry
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 18
Module VI: Re-assessment
Quality of products and services should be continuously monitored. This process includes re-assessment.
Area of operation
Note Critical aspects
Re-evaluation of manufacturers
Re-inspection frequency based on risk assessment
Within 5 year cycle Change control Mechanism for suspension and
withdrawal
Re-inspection policy and procedure followed
Re-evaluation of products
Re-evaluation procedure Within 5 year cycle Variations procedure
Re-evaluation of product policy and procedure followed
Monitoring performance of contractors
Written procedure Covers continuous monitoring,
periodic review and renewal of contracts
System for documenting service problems
Procedure followed for monitoring performance
6. Revision history
Date Version number Reasons for revision
February 2013 1.2013 Original
Assessment Tool: Procurement Agency. Version 1. 2013. Page 19