video ce presentation v2

65
Endodontics: Procedures That Finally Make Sense

Upload: surgentt

Post on 30-Jul-2015

45 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Video ce presentation v2

Endodontics:

Procedures That Finally Make Sense

Page 2: Video ce presentation v2

Consequences of the present way endodontics is being taught

Page 3: Video ce presentation v2

Rotating NiTi: continuous and interrupted

Page 4: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation

Page 5: Video ce presentation v2
Page 6: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.

Page 7: Video ce presentation v2

Aggravated by the narrow mesio-distal dimensions of the canal and the greater taper of the rotating

NiTi instruments

Page 8: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.

Page 9: Video ce presentation v2
Page 10: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.4. Both procedures remove excess tooth structure

in the mesio-distal plane.

Page 11: Video ce presentation v2

The role of mechanical instrumentation in the cleaning or root canals. Zvi Metzger, Michael Solomonov, Anda Kfir. Endodontic Topics 2013;29:87-109.

Page 12: Video ce presentation v2
Page 13: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight line

access.4. Both procedures remove excess tooth structure in

the mesio-distal plane.5. Not effective in cleansing in the bucco-lingual

plane.

Page 14: Video ce presentation v2
Page 15: Video ce presentation v2
Page 16: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.4. Both procedures remove excess tooth structure in

the mesio-distal plane.5. Not effective in cleansing in the bucco-lingual

plane.6. Produces dentinal micro-cracks.

Page 17: Video ce presentation v2
Page 18: Video ce presentation v2

1. Increased chance of instrument separation2. Increased degree of torsional stress to the

instruments and the tooth.3. Requires crown-down preparations and straight

line access.4. Both remove excess tooth structure in the mesio-

distal plane.5. Not effective in cleansing in the bucco-lingual

plane.6. Produces dentinal micro-cracks.7. With a non cutting tip and flutes that drive the

instrument apically, increased amounts of debris are driven apically.

Page 19: Video ce presentation v2

The same rotating fluted design that draws the instrument beyond the apex will also drive the debris

in front of the tip beyond the confines of the root.

Page 20: Video ce presentation v2

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.

Page 21: Video ce presentation v2

When tooth structure is excessively removed in the mesio-distal plane in teeth where the pulp is very

thin in that plane, the roots become weaker.

Page 22: Video ce presentation v2

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the masticatory stresses.

Page 23: Video ce presentation v2

Again, a result of excessive removal of tooth structure in the thinner mesio-distal plane.

Page 24: Video ce presentation v2

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.

Page 25: Video ce presentation v2

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.11. Very expensive.

Page 26: Video ce presentation v2

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.11. Very expensive.12. Increases procedural stress.

Page 27: Video ce presentation v2

When the dentist must be constantly conscious of the impact of the procedures on the integrity of the instrument rather than the integrity of the

root, it underlines the fact that he/she is using a poorly conceived product.

Page 28: Video ce presentation v2

8. Reduces resistance to vertical fractures.9. Gives the canal a shape that increases the masticatory stresses.10. Only for single usage.11. Very expensive.12. Increases procedural stress.13. Still dependent upon the K-file for the glide path.

Page 29: Video ce presentation v2

K-files are used manually for the creation of the glide path producing hand fatigue and tend to

impact debris apically in curved canals resulting in loss of length before rotary NiTi is employed.

Page 30: Video ce presentation v2

And that brings us to a far safer, more efficient, less expensive approach to endodontic instrumentation

that virtually eliminates hand fatigue and separation while preserving far more tooth

structure.

Page 31: Video ce presentation v2

Now let us consider 30º reciprocation of modified reamers oscillating at 3000-4000 cycles per

minute.

Page 32: Video ce presentation v2

1. Use of modified reamers rather than K-files that encounter less resistance making the shaping procedure faster.

Page 33: Video ce presentation v2

K-File

Relieved Reamer

Page 34: Video ce presentation v2

Relieved Vertically Fluted Instrument

K-File

We use these instruments rather than k-files.

Comparing relieved vertically fluted instruments to k-files we observe the following:

1. Fewer flutes on the 16 mm of working length of a relieved vertically fluted instrument than on a k-file approximately 16 flutes versus 30.

Page 35: Video ce presentation v2

Consequences of fewer flutes:

1. There is less engagement along length.

2. Relieved vertically fluted instruments are more flexible than files because they are less work hardened and thinner in cross section.

3. The flutes are more vertically oriented. K-File

Relieved Vertically Fluted Instrument

Page 36: Video ce presentation v2

Relieved Vertically Fluted Instrument

K- File

Consequences of less engagement:1. Less resistance along the shank as we negotiate apically.

Consequences of greater flexibility:1. Able to negotiate curved canals with less chance of distortion.

Consequences of more vertically orientedflutes:1. Able to cut dentin along canal length when the motion of the instrument is either horizontal rotation or reciprocation.

Page 37: Video ce presentation v2

Taken together, the consequences of greater flexibility, lessengagement and more efficient cutting along length produce a superior tactile perception along length and at the tip of the instrument.

Page 38: Video ce presentation v2

The consequences of superior tactile perception:1. Allows the safe incorporation of a cutting tip.

The consequences of a cutting tip:2. The ability to pierce pulpal tissue rather than impact it apically.

2. The ability to distinguish between a tight canal and hitting a wall when used in a watchwinding motion or a reciprocating handpiece.

Page 39: Video ce presentation v2

The incorporation of the reciprocatinghandpiece allows a 30º arc of motionoscillating at 3000-4000 cpm.

A 30º arc of motion represents 1/12 of a circle or 5 minutes on the face of aclock.

The motion is so limited it virtually eliminates the 2 major factors that cause rotary NiTi files to break and unwind,namely, torsional stress and cyclic fatigue.

Page 40: Video ce presentation v2

1. Use of modified reamers rather than K-files that encounter less resistance making the shaping procedure faster.2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goes to the apex.

Page 41: Video ce presentation v2
Page 42: Video ce presentation v2
Page 43: Video ce presentation v2

1. Use of modified reamers rather than K-files that encounter less resistance making the shaping procedure faster.2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goes to the apex.3. Virtually no chance of instrument separation during the full shaping of the canal.

Page 44: Video ce presentation v2

A 30º arc of motion virtually eliminates torsional stress and cyclic fatigue in turn eliminating

instrument separation and dentinal micro-cracks.

Page 45: Video ce presentation v2

1. Use of reamers rather than K-files that encounter less resistance making the shaping procedure faster.2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goes to the apex.3. Virtually no chance of instrument separation during the full shaping of the canal.4. Far less tooth structure sacrificed in the mesio -distal plane.

Page 46: Video ce presentation v2

Rarely, if ever, do we exceed an 04 taper, thus preserving dentin in the mesio-distal plane while removing more tissue in the bucco-lingual plane.

Nor is straight-line access necessary.

Page 47: Video ce presentation v2

1. Use of reamers rather than K-files that encounter less resistance making the shaping procedure faster.2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goes to the apex.3. Virtually no chance of instrument separation during the full shaping of the canal.4. Far less tooth structure sacrificed in the mesio -distal plane.5. Greater debris removal in the bucco-lingual plane.

Page 48: Video ce presentation v2
Page 49: Video ce presentation v2

1. Use of reamers rather than K-files that encounter less resistance making the shaping procedure faster.2. No hand fatigue after the initial instrument goes to the apex.3. Virtually no chance of instrument separation during the full shaping of the canal.4. Far less tooth structure sacrificed in the mesio -distal plane.5. Greater debris removal in the bucco-lingual plane.6. No dentinal micro-cracks.

Page 50: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.

Page 51: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.

Page 52: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.9. Used multiple times.

Page 53: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.

Page 54: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.

Page 55: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.12. Faithfully follows the glidepath created by the most flexible 02 tapered stainless steel reamers.

Page 56: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.12. Faithfully follows the glidepath created by the most flexible 02 tapered stainless steel reamers.13. Pushes far less debris over the apex because of a cutting tip and not being drawn into the depths of the canal.

Page 57: Video ce presentation v2

7. Less reduction in resistance to vertical fracture.8. Lesser tapered preparations making the tooth more resistant to masticatory forces.9. Used multiple times.10. Relatively inexpensive.11. Far less procedural stress.12. Faithfully follows the glidepath created by the most flexible 02 tapered stainless steel reamers.13. Pushes far less debris over the apex because of a cutting tip and not being drawn into the depths of the canal.14. Superior measurement control.

Page 58: Video ce presentation v2
Page 59: Video ce presentation v2

Simple predictable sequencing

(includes both the glide path and full canal shaping as part of the system)

Page 60: Video ce presentation v2
Page 61: Video ce presentation v2

30/04

30/02

Page 62: Video ce presentation v2
Page 63: Video ce presentation v2

You have been presented with a detailed rationale for modified reamers over K-files, 30º reciprocation

oscillating at 3000-4000 cycles per minute rather than continuous or interrupted rotations and the

predominant use of stainless steel 02 tapered instruments rather than greater tapered NiTi that will

increase the quantity and quality of the remaining dentin while increasing the speed and safety of your

procedures.

Page 64: Video ce presentation v2

The relieved reamers combined with the 30º reciprocating handpiece are commercially known as

the SafeSider Instruments and oscillate in the handpiece called the Endo-Express.

Page 65: Video ce presentation v2

For further information on learning these techniques call the offices of Dr. Barry Musikant.

The office number is 212-582-8161 and the address is 119 West 57th Street NYC, NY.

Our E-mail address is [email protected]

For those interested in reviewing supporting research it is available on request.