veterinary /v- dermatologie - dog-health-guide.org · m- figure 5. clear cellophane tape pad strips...

4
VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY DERMATOLOGIE VETERINAIRE /v- Malassezia dermatitis Michael Charach Malassezia pachydermatis is a saprophytic yeast commonly found on normal and abnormal skin of dogs. Malassezia pachydermatis and staphylococci play a significant role in seborrheic dermatitis. Malassezia der- matitis (MD) is common and should be considered in any case exhibiting erythematous, oily, and pruritic dermatitis (1). Specialty dermatology practices may see 2 or more cases of MD a week. Malassezia dermatitis is often the reason for thera- peutic or diagnositc failures. When there is a lack of response to glucocorticoids, antibiotics, antiseborrheic shampoos, insecticides, or miticides, one should consider a diagnosis of MD (2). Some atopic patients that have failed to respond to desensitization have subsequently been diagnosed as having MD and, then, have responded well to desensitization after the MD was successfully treated. The diagnosis of food allergy relies upon the owner's observation of decreased pruritus while the patient is on an elimination food trial. If the patient has MD concurrently with the food allergy, the owner will not observe any decrease in pruitus until the MD has been successfully treated. Malassezia organisms can be cultured easily from normal dog skin, but cytological demonstration of the organism from normal skin is much more difficult. A decrease in the host's defenses or changes in the surface microclimate, such as, excessive sebum, accumulation of moisture, and disruption of the epidermal barrier, may lead to proliferation of Malassezia organisms. Allergic, hormonal, and bacterial skin diseases may be predisposing factors, as are longterm glucocorticoid administration and antibiotic administration (2). One study demonstrated that atopic dogs had higher numbers of yeast than did normal dogs, but not as many as dogs with MD. Factors associated with increased prevalence of higher counts of Malassezia pachydermatis were seborrheic dermatitis, recent antibiotic treatment, and certain breeds (3). Malassezia pachydermatis produces lipases that can liberate fatty acids and zymogen in the yeast cell wall, which activates complement, both actions may con- tribute to cutaneous inflammation (1). Two studies have suggested that the pathogenesis of MD may be related to the yeast antigens acting as an allergen and thus causing an immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction. The 1 st study showed that when seborrheic dogs were skin Figure 1. Malassezia dermatitis on the neck of a basset hound. tested with M. pachydermatis antigen, 30% of them demonstrated immediate skin reactions (4). The other study, which also injected M. pachydermatis intrader- mally, showed that the mean immediate skin test reac- tions were greater in atopic dogs with MD than in atopic dogs without MD, which, in tum, were greater than in normal dogs (5). When dogs with MD are biopsied, the histology is usually consistent with a hypersensitivity pat- tern (1). Some of this hypersensitivity reaction may be due to the yeast, while some can be attributed to an underlying food allergy or atopy. There are many clinical manifestations of MD. Pruritus of a moderate to severe nature is usually a constant feature. Erythema, hyperpigmentation, erythroderma, grey to white scales, and waxy or oily seborrhea are all variable in degree, as is the associated offensive odor. 311 Animal Dermatology Clinic of British Columbia, 140-8040 Garden City Road, Richmond, British Columbia V6Y 2N9. 1'-rvn Vg%t i V^jo jin,%,ft 2a &A.-.., 1 ftf%'7 'kun vul J voIume JO, May IY97

Upload: vannga

Post on 07-Sep-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY DERMATOLOGIE VETERINAIRE

/v-Malassezia dermatitis

Michael Charach

Malassezia pachydermatis is a saprophytic yeastcommonly found on normal and abnormal skin of

dogs. Malassezia pachydermatis and staphylococci playa significant role in seborrheic dermatitis. Malassezia der-matitis (MD) is common and should be considered inany case exhibiting erythematous, oily, and pruriticdermatitis (1). Specialty dermatology practices maysee 2 or more cases of MD a week.

Malassezia dermatitis is often the reason for thera-peutic or diagnositc failures. When there is a lack ofresponse to glucocorticoids, antibiotics, antiseborrheicshampoos, insecticides, or miticides, one should considera diagnosis of MD (2). Some atopic patients that havefailed to respond to desensitization have subsequentlybeen diagnosed as having MD and, then, have respondedwell to desensitization after the MD was successfullytreated. The diagnosis of food allergy relies upon theowner's observation of decreased pruritus while thepatient is on an elimination food trial. If the patienthas MD concurrently with the food allergy, the ownerwill not observe any decrease in pruitus until the MD hasbeen successfully treated.

Malassezia organisms can be cultured easily fromnormal dog skin, but cytological demonstration of theorganism from normal skin is much more difficult. Adecrease in the host's defenses or changes in the surfacemicroclimate, such as, excessive sebum, accumulationof moisture, and disruption of the epidermal barrier,may lead to proliferation of Malassezia organisms.Allergic, hormonal, and bacterial skin diseases may bepredisposing factors, as are longterm glucocorticoidadministration and antibiotic administration (2). Onestudy demonstrated that atopic dogs had higher numbersof yeast than did normal dogs, but not as many as dogswith MD. Factors associated with increased prevalenceof higher counts of Malassezia pachydermatis wereseborrheic dermatitis, recent antibiotic treatment, andcertain breeds (3).

Malassezia pachydermatis produces lipases that canliberate fatty acids and zymogen in the yeast cell wall,which activates complement, both actions may con-tribute to cutaneous inflammation (1). Two studieshave suggested that the pathogenesis of MD may berelated to the yeast antigens acting as an allergen and thuscausing an immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction. The1 st study showed that when seborrheic dogs were skin

Figure 1. Malassezia dermatitis on the neck of a basset hound.

tested with M. pachydermatis antigen, 30% of themdemonstrated immediate skin reactions (4). The otherstudy, which also injected M. pachydermatis intrader-mally, showed that the mean immediate skin test reac-tions were greater in atopic dogs with MD than inatopic dogs without MD, which, in tum, were greater thanin normal dogs (5). When dogs with MD are biopsied, thehistology is usually consistent with a hypersensitivity pat-tern (1). Some of this hypersensitivity reaction may bedue to the yeast, while some can be attributed to anunderlying food allergy or atopy.

There are many clinical manifestations of MD. Pruritusof a moderate to severe nature is usually a constantfeature. Erythema, hyperpigmentation, erythroderma,grey to white scales, and waxy or oily seborrhea are allvariable in degree, as is the associated offensive odor.

311

Animal Dermatology Clinic of British Columbia, 140-8040Garden City Road, Richmond, British Columbia V6Y 2N9.

1'-rvn Vg%t i V^jo jin,%,ft 2a &A.-.., 1 ftf%'7'kun vul J voIume JO, May IY97

Figure 3. Generalized Malassezia dermatitis in a mixedbreed dog.

Figure 2. Malassezia dermatitis on the leg folds of adachshund.

Regional MD is far more common than the general-ized form. The areas of the body that tend to be moremoist and oily are more prone to MD. The most commonpresentation is pododermatitis involving the interdigi-tal spaces or the area between the pads. It is helpful to askthe owner if the dog actually turns the paw over tochew the undersurface of the paws, rather than justlicking the top. Although many allergy-prone breeds maybe affected, Malassezia pododermatitis is commonlyseen in cocker spaniels and golden retrievers. Othercommon regional areas commonly affected include theneck, perianal (under the tail), face (lips, chin, facialfolds), and leg folds (Figure 1). Paw licking and face rub-bing are often associated with allergies, but MD may alsobe an important contributor. Continual face rubbingwith frenzied fits of nose, chin, or lip scratching may beobserved in conjunction with mild erythema, scale, andminor amounts of alopecia. However, this latter der-matitis may be overlooked, as long hair in the areamay obscure these clinical signs. It is imperative that thehair be clipped and the skin closely examined (6).

Pruritus in the perianal area is often associated withanal sacculitis or allergies. However, dogs that rubtheir back end should be examined for MD under the tail.Dachshunds with "accordion-like" folds of skin ontheir legs are also predisposed to developing MD(Figure 2). Paw sucking may be associated with a darkbrown discharge from swollen nail beds and may indi-cate paronychia due to Malassezia pachydermatis (7).

_____

to 'rv1_-s~Mo~

Figure 4. Clear cellophane tape pads (Pat-it 3M Maskingand Packaging System Division) are cut into strips, and usedto collect surface skin samples for cytology.

Generalized MD is much less common than regionalMD. Most of the generalized MD cases occur in mediumto small breed dogs, although 1 author reported 2 casesin German shepherds, and I have treated a case in aSamoyed that was secondary to hypothyroidism(Figure 3). In addition to the predisposed breeds listedin Table 1, I would add golden retrievers with MD ofthe paws secondary to atopy to the list of predisposedbreeds in Table 1.A diagnosis ofMD is usually suggested by the history,

clinical signs, and failure of other therapeutic modalities.The most useful and readily available procedure for

312Can Vet J Volume 38, May 1997

15 I 0%

-. -.... ..,!.M

..

Figure 5. Clear cellophane tape pad strips are used to takeimpression smears for cytological examination.

Table 1. Dog breeds predisposed to Malasseziadermatitis (2)silk terrier Shetland sheepdogAustralian terrier collieMaltese terrier German shepherdJack Russell terrier dachshundWest Highland whiter terrier basset houndchihuahua cocker spanielpoodle springer spaniel

the diagnosis of MD is cytological examination. A sam-ple for this can be collected by rubbing the skin with acotton swab, taking a skin scraping, or making a slideimpression. The slide is heat-fixed and stained withDiff-Quick (Dade Diagnostics, Puerto Rica) or newmethylene blue. Some clinicians have found clear cel-lophane tape to be superior for collecting surface skindebris and scales (8). Packing tape is preferred, as it doesnot curl up as Scotch tape does after immersion instaining solutions. The tape is dipped directly into thestain with no heat fixing, and then viewed at IOOOX.I have found a certain commercial pad of clear cellophanetape (Pat-it, 3M Masking and Packaging SystemDivision, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) the easiest to use,and it gives excellent results. The tape comes in dimen-sions of 3 /2 in by 6 in and there are 25 sheets to a pad.Each sheet can be cut longitudinally into 3 equal widthsusing a box cutter. The tape fits between toes or padsto facilitate the collection of samples (Figures 4-6).Ironically, 1 of the main purposes of this product isthe removal of pet hair from clothes. The diagnosis ofMD is achieved by demonstrating 1 or 2 yeast per fieldat IOOOx. Generally, the more yeast organisms thatare found, the more confident one is of the diagnosis ofMD (8). When there are low numbers of yeast bodiespresent, the diagnosis of MD may be tentative, in whichcase a trial therapy may be the only way to confirmthe diagnosis. Systemic treatment or intense topicaltherapy should result in a positive response (6).The most effective treatment for MD is systemic

therapy with ketoconazole (Nizoral, Janssen Pharma-ceutica, Mississauga, Ontario), 10 mg/kg body weight(BW), P0, ql2h, for 20 to 30 d (10). Topical therapy isusually applied concurrently. Topical treatments, whenused alone, appear to be less reliable than systemicketoconazole (11). One reason for this may be that top-

Figure 6. Clear cellophane tape is mounted on glass slide, afterbeing stained with Diff-Quick (Dade Diagnostics).

ical therapy requires more rigorous frequent applications,either daily or every other day bathing, to be effective.Some cases may fail to respond to topical therapybecause the yeast is too deep in the hair follicle or thepatient is hypersensitive to the organism, thus requiringa more complete clearing of the organism than the top-ical therapy can achieve alone (4,1 1).

Topical therapy can be divided into 3 categories:Creams, shampoos, and rinses. Creams that have beenused successfully on paws include miconazole (ConofiteCream 2%, Janssen Pharmaceutica), ketoconazole(Nizoral Cream, Janssen Pharmaceutica), and clotri-mazole (Canesten, Miles Canada, Etobicoke, Ontario).Shampoos that have been successful include ketocona-zole (Nizoral Shampoo, Janssen Pharmaceutica)andmiconazole (Dermazole, Allerderm-Virbac, Fort Worth,Texas, USA); (Sebolyse, Dermcare-Vet, Queensland,Australia). Helpful but less effective shampoos includeselenium sulphide (Selsun Blue, Abbot Laboratories,Montreal, Quebec; Sellen Suspension, P.V.U., SanofiSante Animale Canada, Victoriaville, Quebec), chlorhex-idine 4% (Hibitane, Ayerst Laboratories, St. Laurent,Quebec), or chlorhexidine 1% (ChlorhexiDerm, DVM,Miami, Florida, USA). The best rinse is probably enil-coazole (Imaverol, Janssen Pharmaceutica). Other rinsesinclude lime sulfur (LymDyp, DVM; vinegar 50/50dilution), and chlorhexidine disinfectant (Hibitane,Ayerst Laboratories) (1,9,11-13).

Generalized cases are usually treated with ketocona-zole administered orally for up to 30 d. Occasional nau-sea or vomiting can be controlled by giving the tabletswith food (6). Topical therapy is used concurrently,utilizing a shampoo with or without a rinse.The high cost of ketoconazole has prompted some to

use it only q24h, or to decrease the dosage to 5 mg/kg,BW, PO, ql2h, while intensifying the topical therapy.While this approach may work for some cases, theoverall success rate may decrease (9-11).

Regional or localized cases of MD may be treatedfairly successfully with a combination of topical thera-pies without the concurrent use of systemic therapy.However, many of these cases may still benefit from con-current use of systemic therapy ( 11).

References1. Mason Ky. Cutaneous Malassezia. In: Griffin CE, KwochkaKW, Macdonald JM, eds. Current Veterinary Dermatology.Toronto: Mosby Year Book, 1993: 44-48.

Can Vet J Volume 38, May 1997 313

2. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE. Small Animal Dermatology,5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995: 351-357.

3. Plant JD. Factors associated with and prevalence of high Malasseziapachydermatis on dog skin. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 201:879-884.

4. Nagata M, Ishida T. Cutaneous reactivity of Malassezia pachy-dermatis in dogs with seborrheic deratitis. Proc Annu MembMeet Am Acad Vet Dermatol Am Coll Vet Dermatol 1995: 11(Abstract).

5. Morris D, Rosser E. Immunologic aspects of Malassezia der-matitis in patients with canine atopic deratitis. Proc Annu MembMeet Am Acad Dermatol Am Coll Vet Dermatol. 1995: 16-17(Abstract).

6. Mason KV. Malassezia dermatitis and otitis. In: Kirk RW,Bonagura JD, eds. Current Veterinary Therapy. 11th ed. Toronto:WB Saunders, 1992: 544-546.

7. Griffin CE. Malassezia proonychia in atopic dogs. Proc AnnuMemb Am Acad Dermatol Am Coll Vet Dermatol. 1996: 51-52(Abstract).

8. Scott DW. Malassezia dermatitis in the dog. Proc Annu Europ SocVet Dermatol. 1995: 93 (Abstract).

9. Mason KV, Stewart LF. Malassezia and canine dermatitis. In: IhrkePJ, Mason IS, White SD, eds. Advances in Veterinary Dermatology,vol 2. New York: Pergamon Pr, 1993: 399-402.

10. Masson KV, Evans AG. Dermatitis associated with Malasseziapachydermatis in 11 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991: 13-18.

11. Fadok VA. Malassezia dermatitis. Proc Am Anim Hosp Assoc.1995: 263-264.

12. Bond R, Rose JF, Ellis JW, Lloyd DH. Comparison of micona-zole/chlorhexidine and selenium sulphide shampoos for treat-ment of Malassezia dermatitis in Basset hounds. Proc AnnuMemb Am Acad Vet Dermatol Am Coll Vet Dermatol. 1995:41-42 (Abstract).

13. Mason KV, Atwell R. Clinical efficacy trials on a chlorhexi-dine/miconazole shampoo for the treatment of seborrheic dermatitisassociated with an overgrowth of Malassezia pachydermatis andcoccoid bacteria. Proc Annu Europ Soc Vet Dermatol. 1995: 222(Abstract).

BOOK REVIEWS COMPTES RENDUS DE LIVRES

Lewis JH. Comparative Hemostasis in Vertebrates.Plenum Publishing Co., New York, 1996. 426 pp. ISBN0-306-44841-6. $89.50 US.

This book was compiled by one of the founding med-ical scientists with a special interest in comparative

hemostasis. This reviewer has had the privilege ofknowing Dr. Lewis and learning from her work fornearly 3 decades. Her interest and research in theplatelets and hemostatic mechanisms of unusual verte-brates and domesticated animals, like the goat, haveclearly advanced our knowledge of these species.The book is presented in 3 parts. Part I offers intro-

ductory materials and an overview of hemostasis inhumans. Part II reviews studies of representative groupsof vertebrates, mostly performed over the years by theauthor and her colleagues and collaborators. Part IIIsummarizes comparative studies from the author's lab-oratory and by others who have investigated hemostasis,hematology, and serology of a variety of mammals incomparison with those of humans.The strength of this book comes from the data col-

lected by Dr. Lewis and her associates on many unusualanimal species over a period spanning several decades.It also provides an in-depth literature review of most ofthe relevant publications in this field prior to the 1980s.For this reason alone, the book is a treasure trove ofknowledge gleaned from a wide literature base, most ofwhich is not readily available to anyone interested in orstudying this subject. Parts II and III are especiallystrong sources of the original literature upon whichtoday's clinical and research efforts in comparativehematology are largely based.As with any text of this type, it suffers somewhat

from being incomplete, especially with respect to pub-lications from the last decade. Many of these morerecent studies address the clinical and research aspectsof animal hemostatic components at the molecular level,and have begun to investigate the genetic manipula-tion of spontaneous and induced animal models of the

hemorrhage diseases. Research literature on hemostasisin rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, and hamsters is more exten-sive than described, although much of the control animaldata for these species is found within published exper-imental studies and may be harder to locate. For exam-ple, several earlier publications of in-depth studies onthese species from this reviewer's group have not beenmentioned. Similarly, early versions of review text-books are cited, but the more recent ones are not(Kaneko's "Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals,"4th ed, Academic Press, 1989; with a 5th edition cur-rently in press; Schalm's "Veterinary Hematology,"4th ed, Lea & Febiger, 1986; and a new title by Jain,"Essentials of Veterinary Hematology," Lea & Febiger,1993). Other sections on the dog, cat, and horse (Part II,Chapters 19 and 23) are relatively weak in terms oftheir scope and the references, which are outdated ormissing. However, some of the missing material ispresented later in Part III, Chapter 27. Table 27.12(p.349) has several notable omissions - namely, thatvon Willebrand's disease is very common in the dog(should be ++++) and has also been reported in thehorse; factor IX deficiency has been reported in severalcat breeds; factor XII deficiency occurs in the dog; andhemophilia A has been reported in sheep and cattle.In relation to these literature sources, it is unclear whya bibliography is given on pp. 409-417, when it does notinclude all the references cited throughout the text.Readers wishing more information on literature from thelast decade, especially on studies of acquired bleedingand thrombotic disorders in animals, can refer to thechapter and bibliography contained in the forthcom-ing 5th edition of the Kaneko text cited above.On balance, this book is a very interesting and use-

ful review of the subject of comparative hemostasis. Itis an excellent literature resource for earlier works inthis field.

Reviewed by W. Jean Dodds, DVM, Hemopet, 938Stanford Street, Santa Monica, California 90403 USA.

314 Can Vet J Volume 38, May 1997