venus tsui, phd, msw worden school of social service our lady of the lake university
DESCRIPTION
Hearing the Voices from Male Victims and Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Presented at the World Conference on Social Work and Social Development. Venus Tsui, PhD, MSW Worden School of Social Service Our Lady of the Lake University [email protected] Monit Cheung, PhD, LCSW - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Hearing the Voices from Male Victims and Survivors
of Intimate Partner Violence Presented at the World Conference on Social Work and Social Development
Venus Tsui, PhD, MSWWorden School of Social ServiceOur Lady of the Lake University
Monit Cheung, PhD, LCSWGraduate College of Social Work
University of [email protected]
July 9, 2012
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
2
All types of abuse Between two people in a close relationship, Power and Control (APA, 2001; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
2006).
The Current Research: IPA against men
Definition of Intimate Partner Abuse (IPA)
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
3
BackgroundConceptual FrameworkMethodFindingsDiscussion Implications
AGENDA
Cheung & Tsui, 2011
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
4
WHY studyIPA against
men ?
Cheung & Tsui, 2011
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
5
1. Alarming statistics2. Insufficient Services3. Men’s low rate of reporting abuse &
utilizing professional services4. Bias & discrimination against male
victims5. Lack of empirical data and research6. Supportive findings from preliminary
studies
BACKGROUND
Cheung & Tsui, 2011
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
6
BACKGROUND
US Canada UK
1.5 million women (4.7%) and 835,000 men (3.2%) experienced raped or physical assault
(age:18 or older)
653,000 women (7%) and 546,000 men (6%) experienced spousal abuse (age: 15 or older)
4.3 million women (26.7%) and 2.7 million men (17.1%) experienced partner abuse. (age: 16-59)
National Violence Against Women Survey (Tjaden & Theonnes, 2000)
Statistics Canada (Department of Justice Canada, 2009)
The British Crime Survey (The Mankind Initiative, 2009)
Prevalence of Male Victims in IPA
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
7
Gender Difference in Reporting Abuse Female victims (4 times) > male victims of
IPA (81% vs 19%) (Brown, 2004)
Men prefer anonymous channels (such as telephone interviews, radio program) (Hines, Brown and Dunning, 2007; Cheung, 2009)
=> Data collection (e.g., online survey) (Wright, 2005)
BACKGROUNDD
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
8
BACKGROUNDSupporting Evidence from Preliminary Studies
An internet-based study found only 19 male-focused services and 4 shelters in the US (Cheung, Leung, & Tsui, 2009)
An online survey: 1/4 of the respondents revealed male victims did NOT utilize social services at all (Tsui et al., 2009).
Barriers: Shame, Denial, Fear, Stigmatization, etc.
=> VERY FEW SERVICES being provided to male victims=> BARRIERS to help-seeking by men
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
9
1. Explore the extent of service use & help-seeking sources
2. Examine the socialization factors, social-network orientation, service use, helpers, abuse experience and sociodemographic variables and their relationship to help-seeking behaviors in male victims of IPA.
3. Identify barriers and facilitators to help-seeking for male victims of IPA, explore the experience of abused men in IPA and their struggles in the help-seeking process.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
10
Figure 1. A Research Framework for Investigating Help-Seeking Behaviors among Male Victims in Intimate Partner Abuse
Theoretical Perspectives
•Gender Role Socialization
•Social Construction of Masculinity
•Social Psychology of Help-Seeking
•Social Isolation
Social & Psychological Factors
•Socialization• Social-Network
Orientation• Service Use
•Helpers•Abuse Experience
Sociodemographics
age, ethnicity,
education, marital status, etc.
Help-Seeking Behaviors
Formal Sources of Support
Informal Sources of Support
Not seeking any form of help
Use of Services
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKD
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
11
HOW?
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
12
RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS Anonymous online self-administered survey
www.surveymonkey.com/s/KS9WG96 www.menweb.org/battered
A mixed methods approach A national study (exploratory) Non-probability Sampling: Convenience, Purposive
& Snowball Sampling Sample: Male Victims (include survivors), age 18
or above, living in the US. Data Collection: between March 2010 and
February, 2012 Approval of the University of Houston IRB
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
13
RESULTS
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
14
Figure 2. Final Sample (N = 220)
RESULTSD
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
15
Demographic Characteristics (N = 220) Most were White (163, 74%) Mean Age: 43 Female partners (200, 91%) More than one-third (83, 38%) were divorced/
separated Two-thirds had children (157, 71%) More than half (122, 56%) achieved college
graduate level or above Approximately two-thirds (129, 59%) were
employed full time Majority were US born (182, 83%) and non-US
born lived in the US for 12.5 years on average
RESULTSD
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
16
Current: 54% (118); In the Past: 46% (102)
Figure 3. Types of Abuse experienced by the Respondents
RESULTS: ABUSE EXPERIENCE (N=220)D
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
17
Utilization: Three-fourths (166) used social services Helpfulness: Overall perceived to be not helpful (< 3 based on a 5-pt scale) Figure 4. Service Utilization Figure 5. Service Helpfulness
Note: Average responses from 80 respondents on a 5-point scale (1=very insufficient & 5=very sufficient)
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
RESULTS: SERVICE USE (N=220)
18
Utilization: 94% (207) approached helpers; preferred informal except religious leaders) to formal help.Helpfulness: informal helpers are more helpful (average = 3.4) than formal helpers (2.6) (based on 5-pt scale)
Figure 6. Helpers Figure 7. Helpers’ Helpfulness
Note: Average responses from 80 respondents on a 5-point scale (1=very insufficient & 5=very sufficient)
RESULTS: HELP-SEEKING SOURCE (N=220)
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
19
RESULTS: BARRIERS & FACILITATORS (N=28) (QUALITATIVE FINDINGS)
Barriers
Facilitators
Word Count
4700 520
# Responses
82 22
# Themes or Categories
8 4
MORE BARRIERS than Facilitators
9 time
s4
times2
times
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
20
RESULTS: QUALITATIVE (N=68) Five Contextual Barriers
Three Personal Barriers
1. Lack of service availability & accessibility
1. Shame and embarrassment
2. Low levels of helpfulness for social services & helpers
2. Lack of knowledge and awareness of IPA
3. Social stigma & isolation: Bias against & non- acceptance of male victims
3. Fear
4. Distrust of law enforcement & legal system
5. Affordability of professional services.
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
21
RESULTS: QUALITATIVE (N=68)
Three Contextual Facilitators
One Personal Facilitator
Effective professional help
Trustful & supportive family & friends.
Free & affordable legal services
Internet access
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
22
BARRIERS TO HELP-SEEKING MODEL FOR IPA MALE VICTIMS
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
23
MEN’S VOICES ABOUT SEEKING HELP All the DV programs I phoned said: “We’re here to
help women.”’ “I feel too ashamed to seek social services.” “I do not get the impression that are either able or
willing to help.” “[I] went to pastor at church and was not believed.
Quit looking for help.”
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
24
Stories Written in the Survey
An Example This is my story with my ex-wife
that I have never told anyone…until after five years of our separation.
Please listen, and please
help.
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
25
Hear Their Voices: A Composite Narrative From Abused Men
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
A Composite Narrative from Abused Men
26
RESULTS: QUALITATIVE (N =68)
Four Major Findings1. Negative psychological effects2. History of child abuse & family history of abuse3. Mental & substance abuse problems of respondents’ partner4. Co-occurrence of child abuse and spousal abuse
Men’s Concerns1.Children2.Legal consequences
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
27
Threats to Internal Validity Threats to External Validity Self-administered survey Only English version
STRENGTHS
LIMITATIONSD
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
28
A TOP TEN LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO HELP MALE VICTIMS OF IPA
1. Acknowledge the existence of male victims who need help and support.
2. Acknowledge the IPA male victims’ service needs.
3. Reform the VAWA policy to include gender-neutral language for the victims.
4. Provide training for law enforcement and legal personnel and helping professionals.
5. Advocate gender-inclusive and gender-sensitive approach for practice and research.
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
29
A TOP TEN LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO HELP MALE VICTIMS OF IPA
6. Dispel myths and misconceptions by strengthening public awareness on IPA against men.
7. Help men reframe and redefine masculinity
8. Engage in anonymity-based approach to service provision
9. Provide more funding resources and culturally sensitive services for male victims
10. Conduct more empirical-based research, both quantitative and qualitative.
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
30
INTIMATE PARTNER ABUSE
RESOURCE GUIDE
http://www.sw.uh.edu/community/cwep/title-iv-e/index.php
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
31
SOCIAL WORK MISSION & VALUESD
rs. Tsu
i & C
he
un
g
32
“Victims, regardless of their gender,
need support and help.”
ZERO TOLERANCE!
INTIMATE PARTNER ABUSE
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
33
THANK YOU!
Drs. T
sui &
Ch
eu
ng
34