venturesome – social purpose finance paul cheng investment manager, venturesome

39
Venturesome – social purpose finance Paul Cheng Investment Manager, Venturesome

Upload: myra-atkinson

Post on 26-Dec-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Venturesome – social purpose finance

Paul Cheng

Investment Manager, Venturesome

2

Agenda

Introduction to Venturesome

Funding needs and financial mechanisms

Future challenges

Case studies

Venturesome: filling a funding gap

Charities are undercapitalised few charities are able to create a surplus that they can

transfer to their balance sheet funding is primarily available in the form of revenue

funding; there is very little capital investment available to charities

Our vision is that, by 2012, lack of access to capital is no longer a major barrier to charities achieving their social impact

Our track record

Since 2002, we have offered over £10m to 150 charities

Default rate is very low: <5% We are currently managing a fund of £8m In 2007, we were awarded Most Innovative

Charity at Britain’s Most Admired Charities awards We learn from our investment in charities, and

share this learning with the wider social investment market, encouraging a more efficient use of capital

The spectrum of venture capital involvementC

OM

ME

RC

IAL

D

RIV

ER

S SO

CIA

L /

PH

ILA

NT

HR

OP

IC

DR

IVE

RS

Commercial Investment in

Social / Environmenta

l Sectors

Community Development

Venture Capital

Social Enterprise

Investment / Social

Venture Capital

Venture Philanthropy /

Charitable Initiatives

VC / SocialSpecialist VC Social / VC Philanthropy Mainstream VC

Environmental

sustainability, CSR and SRI consideration

s for Mainstream VC Investors

The spectrum of venture capital involvementC

OM

ME

RC

IAL

D

RIV

ER

S SO

CIA

L /

PH

ILA

NT

HR

OP

IC

DR

IVE

RS

Commercial Investment in

Social / Environmenta

l Sectors

Community Development

Venture Capital

Social Enterprise

Investment / Social

Venture Capital

Venture Philanthropy /

Charitable Initiatives

VC / SocialSpecialist VC Social / VC Philanthropy Mainstream VC

Environmental

sustainability, CSR and SRI consideration

s for Mainstream VC Investors

Venturesome

Helping individual charities – what we offer

1. Working capital to cover cash flow fluctuations, e.g. when paid in arrears for services rendered. ‘Open’ working capital tides an organisation over before it has raised all the money it needs to meet its costs. ‘Closed’ working capital is used where the funding is already committed.

2. Development capital can be ‘hard’, for the resources needed to carry out operations (e.g. property, vehicles, equipment), or ‘soft’, to support growth and innovation (e.g. the development of a new product)

3. Pre-funding of fundraising, for example where an organisation is fundraising for a new building, and requires a bridging loan to enable it to proceed where it wishes to take advantage of a fixed contract price for building work

Main financial mechanisms used by Venturesome

Underwriting / standby facilities undertaking to provide financing for a particular project if

budgeted income does not materialise

Unsecured loans not taking security on the charity’s assets

Equity and quasi-equity the return the funder receives is linked to the financial success

of the venture

Matching financial mechanisms to funding needs

Matching financial mechanisms to funding needs

HIGH CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

LOW CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

Secured loan

Standby Facility

Overdraft

Unsecured Loan

Patient Capital

Quasi-equity

Equity

Grant

Matching financial mechanisms to funding needs

LOW RISK

Hard DevelopmentCapital

Working Capital (closed)

Pre-funding Capital Fundraising

Working Capital (open)

Soft Development Capital

HIGH RISK

HIGH CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

LOW CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

Secured loan

Standby Facility

Overdraft

Unsecured Loan

Patient Capital

Quasi-equity

Equity

Grant

Matching financial mechanisms to funding needs

LOW RISK

Hard DevelopmentCapital

Working Capital (closed)

Pre-funding Capital Fundraising

Working Capital (open)

Soft Development Capital

HIGH RISK

HIGH CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

LOW CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

Secured loan

Standby Facility

Overdraft

Unsecured Loan

Patient Capital

Quasi-equity

Equity

Grant

Matching financial mechanisms to funding needs

LOW RISK

Hard DevelopmentCapital

Working Capital (closed)

Pre-funding Capital Fundraising

Working Capital (open)

Soft Development Capital

HIGH RISK

INCREASING SUPPLY LITTLE SUPPLY

HIGH CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

LOW CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

Secured loan

Standby Facility

Overdraft

Unsecured Loan

Patient Capital

Quasi-equity

Equity

Grant

14

Matching financial mechanisms to funding needs

Unsecured Loan

Overdraft

Quasi-equity

Equity

Grant

Pre-funding Capital Fundraising

Working Capital (open)

Soft Development Capital

Standby Facility

LOW RISK

HIGH RISK Hard

DevelopmentCapital

Appropriate Funding (correlation)

Patient Capital

Secured loan

Working Capital (closed)

LOW CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

HIGH CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

15

Who funds what?

Unsecured Loan

Overdraft

Quasi-equity

Equity

Grant

Pre-funding Capital

Fundraising

Working Capital (open)

Soft Development Capital

Standby Facility

LOW RISK HIGH RISK

Hard Development Capital

Increasing evidence of commercial finance available

Patient

Capital

Secured loan

Working Capital (closed)

LOW

CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

HIGH

CHANCE OF REPAYMENT

Need for further supply of capital and development of financial instruments

Charity or business?

Social enterprise

What is

“social enterprise”?

Model 1

“Cash Generator”

Model 2

“Trade off financial and social returns”

Model 3

“Lock-step”

The investor universe

+ 8%

The investor universe

+ 8%

Market-rate return

The investor universe

+ 8%0%

Market-rate return

The investor universe

+ 8%0%

Market-rate returnCapital-protected

The investor universe

- 100% + 8%0%

Capital-protected Market-rate return

The investor universe

- 100% + 8%0%

Capital-protected Market-rate returnGrant-makers

The investor universe

- 100% + 8%0%

Capital-protected Market-rate returnGrant-makers

- 15%

The investor universe

- 100% + 8%0%

Capital-protected Market-rate returnGrant-makers

- 15%

?

Future challenges

Changing the grant-making mindset

Future challenges

Changing the grant-making mindset Creating a guarantee fund

Future challenges

Changing the grant-making mindset Creating a guarantee fund Using subordinated debt

Future challenges

Changing the grant-making mindset Creating a guarantee fund Using subordinated debt Creating a social stock exchange

Future challenges

Changing the grant-making mindset Creating a guarantee fund Using subordinated debt Creating a social stock exchange Doing social investment banking deals

Future challenges

Changing the grant-making mindset Creating a guarantee fund Using subordinated debt Creating a social stock exchange Doing social investment banking deals

The emergence of a new financial services industry around social enterprises

“Not everything that counts can be counted. And not everything that can be

counted, counts.”

Albert Einstein

Case studies – working capital

Mental Health Media (2006) low reserves but refocusing of activities required unrestricted funds to

meet expenditure open working capital needed standby facility of £50,000 remains undrawn as funds were raised as expected

Questscope (2004) grants from World Bank and EU up to 14 months late, resulting in

significant working capital problems closed working capital needed unsecured loan of £60,000 repaid in full once grant payment was received

Case studies – development capital

Women Like Us (2005) budget shortfall plus a cashflow difficulty arising from committed

funding being paid in arrears open working capital and soft development capital needed £25,000 standby facility and £25,000 unsecured loan £20,000 drawn down, being repaid monthly Facility extended in 2007; £50,000 standby facility offered

Charity Technology Trust (2007) transitioning from grant-dependency to a more commercial model soft development capital needed £50,000 in the form of a Revenue Participation Right first payment expected April 2008

Case studies – pre-funding of fundraising

St. Cuthbert’s Church (2003) third phase of extensive redevelopment project required building

contracts to be signed, but fundraising was not 100% committed pre-funding of fundraising £80,000 standby facility undrawn, facility ‘recycled’ facility renewed 2007 £50,000 underwriting ahead of BLF grant undrawn, facility recently recycled

Contact details:

Paul Cheng

[email protected]

0207 832 3056