veam2010_trang
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
1/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
2/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
3/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
4/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
5/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
6/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
7/26
` Equation:
In which:` A: trade-attractive/restrictive coefficient` Tij : traded value between country i and country j` Y i ; Y j : size of the economies of country i and
country j respectively` DIS ij :distance between two countries
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
8/26
Factors Trend of impacts
Previous papers
Factors relating to demand and supplyGDP generalised fromGDP of both import and export countries
Positive T Thy Anh and o Nguyn Th ng (2008), Do Thai Tri (2006),o Ng c Ti n (2009),Tiiu Paas (2000),N guy n Thanh Th y and
Jean-Louis Arcand (2009)
GDP of exporting country Positive Cline Carrere (2003),H. Mikael Sandberg (2004),InmaculadaMa rtnez-Zarzosoand Felicitas Nowak -Lehmann D. (2003),
GDP of importing country Positive Cline Carrere (2003), H.Mikael Sandberg (2004), InmaculadaMa rtnez-Zarzosoand Felicitas Nowak -Lehmann D. (2003)
Population generalised from population of both
import and export countries
Positive o Ng c Ti n (2009), Do Thai Tri (2006),
Population of exportingcountry
Positive
Negative
K. Doanh Nguyen and Yoon Heo (2009)and H. Mikael Sandberg (2004)Inmaculada Ma rtnez-Zarzoso and Felicitas Nowak -Lehmann D.(2003), Jacob A. Bikk er (2009)
Population of importingcountry
Negative Inmaculada Ma rtnez-Zarzoso and Felicitas Nowak -Lehmann D.(2003), Cline Carrere (2003), Jacob A. Bikk er (2009)
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
9/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
10/26
` Most of them do not evaluate separately the G DP (population) of import and export economies .
` Most of them are for total export, and do not care
specific characteristics of different products .` Some are not agreed at some points` Some is at product level but not for the case of
Vietnam
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
11/26
` Total export: increased with very high growth rate(>22%), contribute more than 60% in G DP
` P roduct level (use SITC clasification)
P rimary Manufactured
SITC 5: Chemicals and relatedproductsSITC 6: Manufactured goods
classified chiefly by materialSITC 7: Machinery and transportequipment
SITC 8: Miscellaneousmanufactured articles .
SITC 0: Food and live animals
SITC 1 : Beverages and tobacco
SITC 2: Crude materials, inedible,except fuels
SITC 3: Mineral fuels, lubricants andrelated materials
SITC 4: Animal and vegetable oils,
fats and waxes
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
12/26
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
% Primary products
SITC 0:Foodand liveanimals
SITC 2: Crudematerials, inedible, ex
cept fuelsSITC 3:Miner alfuels, lubricantsandrelated materials
Source: Constructed by authors basing on data collected from GCO (2010)
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
13/26
Source: Constructed by authors basing on data collected from GCO (2010)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
%
Year
Manuf actured products
SITC 5: Chemicals andrelated products
SITC 6:Manuf acturedgoods classified chiefly bymaterialSITC 7:Machineryandtr ansport equipment
SITC 8:Miscellaneousmanuf acturedarticles.
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
14/26
` GDP growth of importing partner countries` GDP of Vietnam` P opulation of importing partner countries` P opulation of Vietnam` Bilateral trade agreement that is effective and free
trade area that Vietnam joined` Exchange rate policy` Infrastructure for transportation` Economic differences from partner countries
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
15/26
1. GDP growth of Vietnam influences the export of manufactured products more vigorously than that of primary products
2 . Free trade agreements have different impacts onexport of different product groups
3 . An increase in real exchange rate (depreciation of Vietnam Dong) has positive but different impacts onexport of different product groups
4 . Economic distance has strong positive effects onexport of different product groups Vietnamese tradeis in accordance with H O theory
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
16/26
O riginal model:
Transform to linear model:
Adjusted model:
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
17/26
In the period from 2004 to 2008 for 6 1 partner countries based on availability of all these
following data:
` The value of export: from Vietnam General Custom O ffice and generalized
7 groups of SI TC classification: SI TC 0; 2; 3; 5; 6; 7 ; 8
SI TC 1 and SI TC 4 are excluded
2 bigger groups: primary and manufactured product groups
` GDP; GDP per capital in current US D , and population: from World data bank .
` Bilateral and free trade area is collected by different sources .
` Geographical distance is from o Ng c Ti n (2010)
` Exchange rate: http://www .ers .usda .gov/ Data/Macroeconomics/
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
18/26
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
19/26
` Hypothesis 1 : Vietnams G DP is a little bitsignificant in explaining the growth of export valueof the product in SITC 5 ; 6 ; 7 ; 8 while it is not
significant in the case of SITC 3 in particular andprimary group in general` Reason: industrial structure of economy
SI TC 0 SI TC 2 SI TC 3 SI TC 5 SI TC 6 SI TC 7 SI TC 8Primaryproduct group
Manufacturedproduct group
Coefficient 60.63* 58.9 .5 60.85* 57.97* 82.67** 59.09* 56.03* 66.23*
z v alue ( .77) ( .32) ( .36) ( .76) ( .75) (2.3 ) ( .73) ( .64) ( .82)
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
20/26
` Hypothesis 2: BTA and FTA have positive impactson all product is not totally reasonable:
BTA and FTA have positive impacts in the case of SITC3 ; 5 ; 7 (Reason: few non tariff barriers)Not significant in the case of others
SI TC 0 SI TC 2 SI TC 3 SI TC 5 SI TC 6 SI TC 7 SI TC 8Primaryproduct group
Manufacturedproduct group
Coefficient 2. 6 2. 7.09*** 4.28*** 2.53* 4.7 *** .76 2.67* 2.29z v al ( .39) ( .04) (4.9) (2.74) ( .68) (2.9) ( . 3) ( .73) ( .48
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
21/26
` Hypothesis 3: Reasonable` Depreciation of Vietnam dong makes export value
of different groups of Vietnam increasing
differently:More remarkably for manufacture case than for primarycaseHowever, it is not significant in case of SITC 3
Reason: the elasticities of demand for those goods respectto price are different
SI TC 0 SI TC 2 SI TC 3 SI TC 5 SI TC 6 SI TC 7 SI TC 8Primaryproduct group
Manufacturedproduct group
Coefficient 74.53** 64.3 43.08* 72.75** 72.2** 89.9*** 70.28** 66.52* 72.35**z v alue (2. ) ( .4) ( .7) (2.05) (2. 2) (2.45) (2) ( .89) (2.09)
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
22/26
` Hypothesis 4: Reasonable` Vietnam trade in H O model` Reason: low technology level not suitable for the
new trade theory of economies of scale .
SI TC 0 SI TC 2 SI TC 3 SI TC 5 SI TC 6 SI TC 7 SI TC 8Primaryproduct group
Manufacturedproduct group
Coefficient 5.05*** 6.9 *** 0. 2.6 ** 2.42** 2. 9* 4.45*** 5.54*** 4.63***z v alue (4.02) (3.79) (0.03) (2.05) (2) ( .63) (3.58) (4.42) (3.54)
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
23/26
` GDP of import partner and P opulation of Vietnamdo not affect on export value of all product groups
` P opulation of importing countries have a little
positive effect on all groups with the level of impacts decreasing in the order of: SITC 0 ; SITC2 ; SITC8
Reason: some are necessary goods and some are inputof production with high labor-intensity
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
24/26
` D istance cause negative impacts on export of allgroups with the higher level in primary case thanin manufacture case
Reason: Deterioration characteristics of somegoods
` Border cause positive impacts on export of allgroups with the higher level in manufacture case
than in primary caseReason: Similarity in culture and tradition
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
25/26
` P romote supply of export product: transform
industrial structure, enhance labor productivity,
moving export product .` Adjust exporting destination. Have different
market structure strategy for each group .
` Manage exchange rate and international
cooperation policies accurately
-
8/8/2019 VEAM2010_Trang
26/26