various security projects
TRANSCRIPT
Various Security Projects
Pre-Proposal Conference
Agenda
• Introduction – Scott Rasplicka
• GPA Welcome – Kevin Doyle
• LINC – Page Siplon
• Request for Proposal - Scott Rasplicka
– Scope of Work
– Requirements
– Appendices
Agenda (cont)
• RFP (cont)
– Commissioning
– Bid Process
– Schedule
– Contracts
• Questions
• Bus Tour – Port Police
• Conclusion – Scott Rasplicka
Staff Introduction
• Kevin Doyle – GM of Protective Services
• Bill Sutton – Assistant Director of MIS
• Mill Lawson – Port Security Systems Administrator
• Adam Lutz – Manager of Terminal Automations
• Mike Bray – Purchasing Manager
• Cathy Willis - Administrative Manager for Grants
• Capt. Frank Manson – Chief of Port Police
Staff Introduction (cont)
• Guy Buck – Port Police
• Sgt. David Eller – Port Police
• Artis Morrison – Facility Security MGR, Brunswick
• Maj. Thomas Thompson – Port Police
• Lisa Lansford – Purchasing Coordinator
• Randy Murray – Manager IT
• Randy Hutcheson – Manager, Systems Admin
• Brad Goodman – City of Savannah Network Manager
• Lewis Leonard – Chatham County ICS Director
• Scott Rasplicka – CEO Home Port Solutions, Consultant to GPA
Welcome
• Kevin Doyle
– General Manager of Protective Services
– Project Owner
LINC
• Page Siplon – Executive Director
• Accelerating Growth & Competitiveness
– The Center of Innovation for Logistics is Georgia's leading resource for accelerating logistics growth and competitiveness in the state. Our approach is simple: we bring together a wide range of stakeholders to address logistics issues. We call this our problem holder–problem solver model.
• http://logistics.georgiainnovation.org
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
SOW General Comments
• One System
– Multiple Grants (new subsystems)
– Legacy Systems
• Access Control
• Fence Detection
• Security Cameras
• Operational Cameras
– Multiple Terminals
General Comments (cont)
• Big Picture
– Where we are now
– Where we will be after these grant projects are implemented
– Where we want to go
• Choosing the Team is as Important as Choosing the Technology
– Who can get us where we want to go?
General Comments (cont)
• Administratively Difficult– While project should be executed as one project,
administratively these are separate projects
• Reasonable Man Approach– Not a Fortress
• Must Improve Operations – Not Impede!
• KISS – Keep It Simple Stupid
• Projects Presented Here Are Concepts– You are the experts
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
Savannah River Intrusion Network
• Visual Coverage of the Savannah River
– Elba Island to Houlihan Bridge
• Four Lines of Demarcation (Gates) – increasing scrutiny
– Houlihan Bridge
– Elba Island
– West of GCT
– East of OT – near Talmadge Bridge
SRIN (cont)
SRIN (cont)
• 24 hour coverage
• Semi-automated
– Detection by
• Size
• Speed
• Location
• Other considerations– Length of time in an area
– regular
SRIN (cont)
• Ad hoc exclusion zones
• Areas of Particular Interest
– Rousakis Square / River Street
– Trade Center / Ferry Docks
– Back side of Elba Island
• Cameras
– Number, type and location determined by bidders
– Mixture of 24 fixed and PTZ in original concept
SRIN Concept
SRIN (cont)
• Network
– Near Terminals may tie directly into existing network
– Off Terminal may use wireless, internet or other means
• Some areas may not have power or transmission sources available
– May use existing equipment as available
SRIN (cont)
• SCMPD Connection to GCT Admin building
– Server room to corner of HWY 25 and Dean Forrest Rd
• Pass data to SCMPD monitoring room and allow control of certain cameras
• Other Connections
– Any terminal may connect at their expense to the SRIN and pass data to GPA/SCMPD
– USCG and other government entities
SRIN (cont)
• New Monitoring Center
– Designed for 3 people
• Minimum of 1 person on duty at all times in SOC
• 2 people on duty in SOC when needed
• 3rd person is supervisory position to be used in higher MARSEC levels, emergencies or training
– 2nd monitoring station at GCT front desk – full time
– 3rd monitoring station at credentialing center
• Distributed Monitoring and Analytics - shall allow increased coverage without increased labor
SRIN
• Video / Data Recording
– Data recording devices may be located in the server room
• Must provide heat/power requirements for all equipment
• Redundancy is required to minimize risk of loss
– Distributed Recording may also be used to reduce network congestion
• Redundancy still required
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
• Visual Coverage of the Brunswick River– Docks on Colonel’s Island
– Southern tip of Blythe Island
• Lines of Demarcation (Gates) – East and West of Colonel’s Island
• Ad hoc exclusion zones
• Cameras– Number, type and location determined by bidders
– Mixture of 6 fixed and PTZ in original concept
CIIN (cont)
• 24 hour coverage
• Semi-automated
– Detection by
• Size
• Speed
• Location
• Other considerations– Length of time in an area
– regular
CIIN (cont)
• Network
– Dockside Cameras may tie directly into existing network
– Blythe Island may need wireless data connection and solar power / batteries
• Current Network between GCT and CI / MP is a T-1
• Future Network shall provide up to 600 Mbs
CIIN (cont)
• Distributed Monitoring and Analytics - shall allow increased coverage without increased labor
– Primary Monitor - GCT’s New Monitoring Center
– Secondary Monitor - Locally in Guard Shack
• Data Recording Most Likely On site
– Must be redundant
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
LL / Thermal
• Provide Thermal Detection
– See beyond fence into trees and water
• Mostly fixed cameras in most vulnerable spots (4)
• At least one mobile asset (mounted on patrol car)
• Vehicle-mounted (rugged) laptops (2)
– TWIC readers attached
– Wireless connection
– Ability to receive and display video feeds and control cameras
LL/Thermal (cont)
• Analytics
• Recorder
• Monitor
– Guard Shack
– Capability to distribute to roving patrols
• Primary Monitor at GCT
• Must provide power and video to camera locations
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
TWIC Access System Integration
• Fixed TWIC biometric readers at MP and CI gates
– Integrate into Access Control System
• Build New Pedestal at CI
• TWIC Enrollment Stations
– Two may be fixed
– At least two should be mobile
TWIC ASI (cont)
• Wireless Access Points
– MP
• Complete coverage of MP including inside the warehouse
– CI
• As much coverage as possible
• Gates and dock areas at a minimum
• May be used to transmit video to network
TWIC ASI (cont)
• Hand-held TWIC Readers (8)
– Communicate over wireless system
– Read and capture data from TWIC
– Communicate with access control system
• Compare existing data to current read
• Check TWIC TSA Hot List
• Record data from TWIC
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
Option 1: Access Control System
• Existing AMAG ACS is Not TWIC Compatible
– AMAG requires an upgrade
– All biometric readers must be replaced
– Visitor Control system is home grown
– Enrollment System is home grown
• System Selection Will Be Made in conjunction with TWIC ASI
– Funding is imminent
ACS (cont)
• Existing System includes:
– Magal Senstar fence detection system
– Perimeter cameras
• Passes Data to Navis TOS
– Allows mission tickets to be printed at gate if valid ID presented by trucker
– Link Trucker / Passenger to Truck
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
Options 4 & 5: SRIN & CIIN
• Concepts and Budgeting were developed two years ago for SRIN and CIIN
– Budget may be inadequate
– Full system design should be developed regardless
• Make recommendation regarding what to buy first
• Options will be used to seek future funding
Option 3: Command and Control System
• GPA has Multiple Systems in Place
– Magal Senstar Fence Detection
– Perimeter Cameras
– Operational Cameras
– AMAG ACS
– Navis TOS / ATAMS
– Trouble Kiosks
Option 3 (cont)
• New Systems to be Fielded
– SRIN
– CIIN
– Lowlight / Thermal
– TWIC
– Remote TWIC Monitoring
Option 3 (cont)
• 1 System
– All systems shall be brought into 1 system for command, control, dispatch, dissemination, analysis, recording
– SRIN, CIIN and LL/Thermal should all be installed as a single system
– Provide a plan to connect existing systems
Option 3 (cont)
• Command and Control Can Be Deployed in Multiple Ways
– As part of an access control system
– As part of an analytics system
– As a standalone system
• No Funding Available
– Fund through SRIN, CIIN or LL/Thermal
– Make request for future grants
Option 6: Connect Existing Systems
• Depending on How the Command and Control System is Fielded, Option 6 May Be needed to:
– Provide a plan for connecting existing systems
– Determine funding necessary
– Identify additional equipment or changes that must take place to bring everything into one system
Scope of Work
– Savannah River Intrusion Network
– Colonel’s Island Intrusion Network
– Lowlight / Thermal Detection and Response
– TWIC Access System Integration
• Option 1: Access Control System
– Options 3-6
– Option 7: Unsolicited
Option 7: Unsolicited
• This is an opportunity to recommend systems or changes to improve the overall security of the Ports that have not been requested in the RFP
– May be used to obtain future grants
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
Requirements
• 3 Types of Requirements
– Shall – indicates mandatory
– Should – indicates reasonably required
– May – indicates a “nice-to-have”
• No One is Expected to Meet All Requirements
– Must indicate levels guaranteed for each requirement
Requirements (cont)
• General Requirements
– Improve Security
– Use Automation to reduce/maintain personnel
– Life Cycle Costs estimates
• Initial Cost
• Replacements
• Maintenance
– Reliability – No Single Point Failures
– Grounding – 5 ohms – no chemicals
Requirements (cont)
• Backup Power
– 1 hour general requirement
– 3 Days if supplied by solar power
– None if tied to a source with generator backup
• OFF THE SHELF – Open Architecture
• Operations and Maintenance Manuals
• Warranties
Requirements (cont)
• Weather
– All conditions – no exceptions
• Winds – 3 Stages
– Low Winds – operational
– Medium Winds – Not operational but returns automatically when winds die down
– Cat 5 Hurricane – Not operational without assistance
Requirements (cont)
• Network Latency – Camera Control and Response Times
• Automation – no excuses
– Camera Angles
– Sun Spots
• Recording – 30 Days
• GPA Prefers Oracle Databases but also uses SQL
Requirements (cont)
• TWIC Biometric Readers– Fast Enrollment
– Fast Reads
– Few Failures – No Exceptions• Greasy Hands
• Cut Fingers
• Poor Ridges
• Command Center– Situational Awareness!!!
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
Appendices
• AMAG Inventory
– AMAG Symmetry S813 – 48
• Biometric + Smartcard
– AMAG Symmetry S635 – 54
• Magnetic Swipe
– Keypad Only - 1
Appendices
• Appendices are being Re-evaluated– As described in RFP – too sensitive
• Appendix 14: Fiber Loop– Dark fiber is unreliable
• Bidders shall select camera locations
• Bidders shall seek closest network node and price accordingly
• Top proposals shall verify locations and network before final pricing
– Network Nodes will be published
Appendices (cont)
• Appendix 16: Existing Fence Detection System– No benefit to providing it to bidders
– If you need specific information, submit a formal question in writing
– Will not be published
• Appendix 17: List of Existing Camera Locations– Will not be published
– Bidders shall assume no cameras are present in locations sought with these grants
Appendix 18: Camera Fields of View
• Too Sensitive – Will Not be Published
– Specific questions can be asked in writing
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
Commissioning
• Provide Draft Test Plan
– What tests at component level?
– What tests at system level?
– How will you accomplish tests – set up scenarios?
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
Bid Process
• Bid Team Will Review Proposals
– Finance Team (40%)
– Technical Team (60%)
• 20 Copies of Technical Proposal with Disks
• 1 Copy of Financial Proposal
• GPA Will Invite 2-5 Teams for Orals
– May be followed by demonstrations or proof of concept
Proposal
• 10% Bid Bond
• Bid Forms
– Appendices
• Several forms will be turned in with proposal
– Addendums
• Must indicate that proposals take into account addendums
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
Schedule
• Written Questions Due – 24 April
• GPA Responses – 8 May
• Proposals Due – 21 May
• Expect 3 months minimum before evaluations completed
• Letter of Intent
– Contract negotiations
• Start Work – Estimate 1 Nov
Request for Proposal
• Scope of Work
• Requirements
• Appendices
• Commissioning
• Bid Process
• Schedule
• Contracts
Contract
• Selected Team will be required to supply a contract
– Acknowledge Forms
• Multiple Contracts – One Per System
• Proposal and RFP will remain a Part of the Contract
– Requirements
– Accepted Levels of Performance
Questions and Answers
• Questions and Responses will be Published
– Exception: Questions that are sensitive to bidder
– Must be indicated
– May be overruled by GPA