variability of total column ozone during jan 2005 - jun 2011 :

Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN 2005 - JUN 2011: Consistency Among Four Independent Multi-year Data Records E.W. Chiou ADNET Systems Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA P.K. Bhartia, R.D. McPeters, S.M. Frith NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA D.G. Loyola, R.M. Coldewey-Egbers German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany V.E.Fioletov Environment Canada, North York, Ontario, Canada Summary: Variability of total column ozone for the 78-month period covering JAN 2005 to JUN 2011 has been analyzed using the measurements from four independent multi-year data records: (1) OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) (2) SBUV (Solar backscattered ultraviolet instruments) (version 8.6) (3) GTO (GOME type total ozone) (4) Ground-based (Dobson+Brewer+Filter) Instruments For monthly zonal means, the three satellite data records show very good agreement with peak-to-peak offsets in the range of 1.04% to 2.75% . The corresponding offsets between Ground-based record and satellite records are larger by more than a factor of 2, ranging between 4.86% to 5.82%. The zonal mean anomalies inferred from satellite data records show peak-to-peak differences within 0.70% to 1.98%. The differences between satellite data records and Ground-based record range between 3.99% to 5.96%. 1 I. The Four Independent Multi-year Total Ozone Data Records Consistency in terms of Monthly Zonal Mean Total Ozone (78-month period; Jan 2005- 2011) III. Consistency in terms of MZM(Monthly Zonal Mean) An [*Anomaly: MZM minus monthly average of all V. CONCLUDING REMARKS: (4) Ground-based Total Ozone Record (3) GTO (GOME-type Total Ozone) (2) SBUV (Version 8.6) Merged Ozone Data Record (1)OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) Total Ozone Data Record IV. Summary Statistics (Quantitative Illustration for the Consistency Among the Four Data Records) Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aboard the Earth Observing System (EOS) AURA satellite compact nadir viewing, wide swath, ultraviolet-visible -500 nm) hyperspectral imaging spectrometer that ides daily global coverage with high spatial and spectral olution. Satellite Launch Date: JUL 15, 2004 Equator Crossing Time: 13:45 local time Spectral Coverage: 270-500 nm Average Spectral Resolution: 0.63 nm (UV-1) 0.42 nm (UV-2) 0.63 nm (VIS) Ground Pixel Size at nadir: 13 x 24 km2 (UV-2 and VIS) 14 x 48 km2 (UV-1) Data Start Date: AUG, 2004 l column ozone products have been retrieved using two erent retrieval algorithms: (a) the modified TOMS version 8 S v8.5) algorithm, and (b) the Differential Optical rption Spectroscopy (DOAS) technique. data records used in this study are based on the OMI TOMS v8.5 al column ozone data products. “Row Anomaly” first appeared in June 2007 at cross-track positions 4 and the anomaly began to expand to other cross-track positions e May 2008. Anomaly Flags are provided in OMI total column ozone l-2 data product to indicate the measurements affected by the row aly. V. CONCLUDING REMARKS * Throughout the 78-month period and for all 4 latitudinal zones, the three satellite data reco show excellent agreement regarding the variability of total column ozone. * The total column ozone variability inferred from the ground-based data record shows similar overall characteristics but with noticeable discrepancy Such discrepancy could be attributed to: (i) the inhomogeneous spatial coverage of the ground stations, and (ii) the variations in the types of ground station instruments. * OMI data records show very good agreement with the two merged ozone data records (GTO and SB Despite the occurrence of “Row Anomaly” after July 2007, the offsets between the ozone va OMI and from the two merged ozone data records remain stable throughout the entire 78-month without any noticeable drifts. .

Upload: gabe

Post on 24-Feb-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents

2 download

Report

Download

Tags:

Embed Size (px):

DESCRIPTION

III. Consistency in terms of MZM(Monthly Zonal Mean) Anomaly* [*Anomaly: MZM minus monthly average of all years]. Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN 2005 - JUN 2011 : Consistency Among Four Independent Multi-year Data Records - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN 2005 - JUN 2011 :

Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN 2005 - JUN 2011:Consistency Among Four Independent Multi-year Data Records E.W. Chiou ADNET Systems Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA

P.K. Bhartia, R.D. McPeters, S.M. Frith NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

D.G. Loyola, R.M. Coldewey-Egbers German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

V.E.Fioletov Environment Canada, North York, Ontario, Canada

Summary: Variability of total column ozone for the 78-month period covering JAN 2005 to JUN 2011 has been analyzed using the measurements from four independent

multi-year data records: (1) OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument)

(2) SBUV (Solar backscattered ultraviolet instruments) (version 8.6)

(3) GTO (GOME type total ozone)

(4) Ground-based (Dobson+Brewer+Filter) Instruments For monthly zonal means, the three satellite data records show very good agreement with peak-to-peak offsets in the range of 1.04% to 2.75% .

The corresponding offsets between Ground-based record and satellite records are larger by more than a factor of 2, ranging between 4.86% to 5.82%. The zonal mean anomalies inferred from satellite data records show peak-to-peak differences within 0.70% to 1.98%.

The differences between satellite data records and Ground-based record range between 3.99% to 5.96%.

I. The Four Independent Multi-year Total Ozone Data Records

II. Consistency in terms of Monthly Zonal Mean Total Ozone (78-month period; Jan 2005-Jun 2011)

III. Consistency in terms of MZM(Monthly Zonal Mean) Anomaly* [*Anomaly: MZM minus monthly average of all years]

V. CONCLUDING REMARKS:

(4) Ground-based Total Ozone Record(3) GTO (GOME-type Total Ozone)(2) SBUV (Version 8.6) Merged Ozone Data Record

(1) OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) Total Ozone Data Record IV. Summary Statistics (Quantitative Illustration for

the Consistency Among the Four Data Records)The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aboard theNASA Earth Observing System (EOS) AURA satelliteis a compact nadir viewing, wide swath, ultraviolet-visible(270-500 nm) hyperspectral imaging spectrometer thatprovides daily global coverage with high spatial and spectral resolution. Satellite Launch Date: JUL 15, 2004 Equator Crossing Time: 13:45 local time Spectral Coverage: 270-500 nm Average Spectral Resolution: 0.63 nm (UV-1) 0.42 nm (UV-2) 0.63 nm (VIS) Ground Pixel Size at nadir: 13 x 24 km2 (UV-2 and VIS) 14 x 48 km2 (UV-1) Data Start Date: AUG, 2004

Total column ozone products have been retrieved using twodifferent retrieval algorithms: (a) the modified TOMS version 8(TOMS v8.5) algorithm, and (b) the Differential OpticalAbsorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) technique. The data records used in this study are based on the OMI TOMS v8.5 total column ozone data products. “Row Anomaly” first appeared in June 2007 at cross-track positions53-54 and the anomaly began to expand to other cross-track positionssince May 2008. Anomaly Flags are provided in OMI total column ozone level-2 data product to indicate the measurements affected by the rowanomaly.

V. CONCLUDING REMARKS* Throughout the 78-month period and for all 4 latitudinal zones, the three satellite data records show excellent agreement regarding the variability of total column ozone.

* The total column ozone variability inferred from the ground-based data record shows similar overall characteristics but with noticeable discrepancy Such discrepancy could be attributed to: (i) the inhomogeneous spatial coverage of the ground stations, and (ii) the variations in the types of ground station instruments.

* OMI data records show very good agreement with the two merged ozone data records (GTO and SBUV). Despite the occurrence of “Row Anomaly” after July 2007, the offsets between the ozone variability from OMI and from the two merged ozone data records remain stable throughout the entire 78-month period without any noticeable drifts. .

Findings for the OMPS Nadir Mapper 1 st Guess Total Column Ozone (INCTO) Nadir Mapper Total Column Ozone EDR (OOTCO) in Support of Promotion to Beta Maturity

Total Column Ozone Variability and Trends over Kenya using

Drivers of column-average CO2 variability at Southern Hemispheric

Analysis and attribution of total column ozone changes over ......Analysis and attribution of total column ozone changes over the Tibetan Plateau during 1979–2017 Yajuan Li 1,2 ,

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION OF OZONE IN IRAQ · 2020-01-08 · Keyword: total ozone column, temporal and spatial ozone variation, OMI, TOMS, time series, SD, CV. INTRODUCTION Ozone

Short term variability of the ozone and other species simulated using LYRA data

Seasonal inﬂuences on surface ozone variability in continental … · 2020. 7. 31. · 15492 T. L. Laban et al.: Seasonal inﬂuences on surface ozone variability stationary state

Background Ozone in Surface Air over the United States: Variability, Climate Linkages,

THE INTERANNUAL SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE TOTAL OZONE COLUMN MIDLATITUDE MAXIMUM: AN INDICATOR OF TROPOSPHERIC- STRATOSPHERIC COUPLED

Interannual variability of ozone and carbon monoxide at the Whistler

High precision, absolute total column ozone …pandonia.net/media/documents/PandoraTCO_JGR... · High precision, absolute total column ozone measurements from the Pandora spectrometer

SCIAMACHY OZONE COLUMN VALIDATION WITH ...envisat.esa.int/workshops/acve2/papers/ESC01HE.pdfSCIAMACHY OZONE COLUMN VALIDATION WITH MODELS AND ASSIMILATION H. J. Eskes(1) and A. Dethof(2)