value capture techniques in hong kong and tokyositeresources.worldbank.org/.../murakami-web.pdf ·...

21
1 Value Capture Techniques in Hong Kong and Tokyo: Strategic Transit Finance and Station Area Development Jin Murakami City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong R+P Model

Upload: truongdat

Post on 28-Aug-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Value Capture Techniques in Hong Kong and Tokyo:Strategic Transit Finance and Station Area Development

Jin MurakamiCity University of Hong Kong

Hong KongR+P Model

2

Total Land Area

1,104 sq km

Urban Area

261 sq km

(23.6%)

Population

7 million

Urban Density

26,700 people/sq km

Private Vehicles

60/1,000 residents

Hong Kong

MTR is a “backbone” of Hong Kong’s urban developmentHong Kong’s “urban density” supports MTR’s ridership    

R+P DevelopmentRail Extensions (1998-2006) & Property Packages (1980-2005)

1980-2005

38/82 stations

3

MTR Corporation

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/0/896/earth_lights_lrg.jpg

MTR Corporation, 2001-2010

Source: Murakami, Jin. 2012. Transit Value Capture

1 HKD = 0.27 BRL

Net

Op

erat

ing

inco

me

Value Capture Mechanism

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/0/896/earth_lights_lrg.jpg

HKSAR

PrivateDevelopers

Development Rights

MTR Corp.R+P Programme

Green-fieldPrice

After-rail Price

Financial Return 1980-2005

US$18 billion

4

Integrated Development Package

Source: AL Stephan (2013)

Kowloon Station (1998‐2010): 13.5 ha

Station Typology

Source: Murakami (2010)

5

Source: Cervero & Murakami (2009)

MTR Extensions & Incomes

Early Generation

0.58ha0.58ha

Tin Hau Station (1989)

Site Area…0.58 ha 

Residential… 61,000 sqm(72.9%)

Commercial… 3,700 sqm(4.4%)

Others… 19,000 sqm(22.7%)

Parking… 650 lotsF.A.R… 14.43

6

Recent Generation

21.70ha21.70ha

Tung Chung Station (1998)

Site Area… 21.7 haResidential… 935,910 sqm (90.8%)

Office…14,999 sqm(1.5%)

Commercial… 55,862 sqm(5.4%)

Hotel… 22,000 sqm(2.1%)

Others…2,063 sqm(0.2%)

Parking….. 3,869 lots

F.A.R… 4.76

Close Relations with Developerse.g., MTR Tung Chung Station Property Package Diagram

Source: Cervero & Murakami (2008)

7

Benefit Sharing with Developers

Investment Returns are spited by…

1) Upfront Profit Sharing2) MTRC’s In‐kind Asset Sharing3) End Profit Sharing

GOVERNMENT

Property RailwaySYNERGYImprove

accessibility & land value

SOCIETY & ECONOMY

Finance construction &

improve ridership

Financial Gains

Sustainable urban living & growth generation

R+P Model: Justification

8

Key Instrument (1): Master Plan“Hong Kong 2030”  Planning Vision & Strategy 

Key Instrument (2): ZoningComprehensive Development Area (CDA) Zone around MRT Stations

Flexible Coordination  for Complex & Dynamic  Mixed‐Use Development 

9

Key Instrument (3): Master Layout

Key Instrument (4): Legal Requirement

The vast majority of development in Hong Kong comprise high‐rise buildings and mixed user developments within commercial uses in the podium and residential and office above. Thus, the purpose of the DMC is to ensure that a fair balance is struck between the interests of all parties, including future purchasers with regard to responsibilities and costs for the long‐term management and unkeep of the building. All DMCs have to be submitted to and approved by the Legal Advisory and Conveyancing Office (LACO) .  BTW, when government, institutional or community facilities (GIC) are included, there are considerable delays in getting the DMC approved.

“Deeds of Mutual Covenant (DMC)”

10

Tokyo Multiple Integration

Models

Tokyo Metropolitan AreaPopulation: 36.93 million

Land Area: 13,368 sq. km

11

Railway Network in Tokyo

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/0/896/earth_lights_lrg.jpg

about 3 500 km

about 2 000 stations

Railway Network in Tokyo

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/0/896/earth_lights_lrg.jpg

about 3 500 km

about 2 000 stations

48 Operators

12

Three Examples

Example 3

Example 1

Example 2

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (1)

http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/0/896/earth_lights_lrg.jpg

Tokyu Corporation, 2001-2009

Source: Murakami, Jin. 2012. Transit Value Capture

Net

Op

erat

ing

inco

me

1 JPY = 0.021 BRL

13

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (2)Privately Develop & Operate

Total 105 km Rail Network

Garden City

Shibuya

Tama‐Plaza Station Area (5.1 ha)

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (3)

Source: Nikken Sekkei Corporation

Garden City Line & New Town Development 2,983 ha (1960‐1980s)

14

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (2)Privately Develop & Operate

Total 105 km Rail Network

Garden City

Shibuya

Tama‐Plaza Station Redevelopment 5.1 ha (2005‐2010)

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (4)

Source: Nikken Sekkei Corporation

15

Futagotamagawa Station Redevelopment 11.2 ha (2000-2015)

Source: Tokyu Corporation 2013

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (5)

Shop

Corporate Ownership & Stewardship Model

Group’s Intergenerational Resource Allocation

Very-LowRidership

Farm LandLand Readjustment 

Univ. house house house houseMall

High percentage of the key station areas are owned by Tokyu Corporation

Tokyu’sRailway Business

Tokyu’sProperty Business

HighRidership

Land Readjustment/Redevelopment 

Condo.

Office/Hotel

Very HighRidership

Example 1: Tokyu Corporation (6)

16

Example 2: H-R Integration (1)

Source: Chiba Prefecture 2012

Tsukuba Express (1998-2006)

Chiba

Ibaragi

Saitama

TokyoYamanoteLoop

TX

Tsukuba

AkihabaraPlanning AreaIntensive Area

Chiba

Ibaragi

Saitama

TokyoYamanoteLoop

TX

Tsukuba

AkihabaraPlanning AreaIntensive Area

58 km

20 Stations

Rail Construction Costs

US$ 9.4 billion

Integrated Housing-Rail Development Act of 1989Land Readjustment Projects

19 Districts

Total 2,908 ha

Example 2: H-R Integration (2)

Source: Chiba Prefecture 2012

AA

BB E

E

DDC C

Park

A’s Original Land Adjusted Land

Reduced Land

Public Uses

Investment

Public Budget

Public UsesCompensations

Sale

For SaleAA

BB E

E

DDC CPark

A ’s Original Land Adjusted Land

Reduced Land

Budget

Compensations

Sale

For Sale

Public Uses

Public Uses

1 st Stage

Right of Way

Land Re-adjustment Project Area

Acquired Land

Readjustment

2 nd . Stage

3 rd. StageNew Station

Right of Way

Commercial Use

Park

Residential Use

1 st Stage

Right of Way-Project Area

Acquired Land

Re-adjustment

2 nd . Stage

3 rd. Stage

New Station

Right of Way

Commercial Use

ParkResidential Use

Integrated H-R Land Readjustment: Mechanism

<Local Governments, Housing Agencies, Land Owners>

17

Example 2: H-R Integration (3)

Source: Chiba Prefecture 2012

Example 2: H-R Integration (4)

Source: Chiba Prefecture 2012

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

TX Ave. Ridership / day

18

Example 3: Depot Redevelopment (1)

Source: JNR Settlement Corporation 2008

Urban Regeneration

JNR Yard: National Land Sales

Shinagawa Station 16.2 ha (1992-2008)

Example 3: Depot Redevelopment (2)

19

Redevelopment Instrument (1)

Original Land OwnershipSuperblock DistrictsAccess Road, Public Open Space, Pedestrian Network, etc

Private Land Reduction

40.8%

Source: JNR Settlement Corporation 2008

Project Costs

US$ 350 million(Reserved Land Sales,

No Subsidy )

“Land Readjustment”

Redevelopment Instrument (2)Civic Space Provision & FAR Bonus(e.g., Case of Shinagawa Station Area)

4.0

FAR AssessmentBefore

(Industrial Site)

4.0

7.0

BaseFAR

After(Office Site)

Green Space, Underground Access Road & Pedestrian Network18,167 sq.m. Civic Open Space12,480 sq.m

+1.9

Joint Housing Provision35,433 sq.m.

+0.6

9.5

20

Redevelopment Instrument (3)

A B C D F F

a b cd e f

PublicA,B,C,D,E & F

a, b, c, d, e, & f

a

b

c

d

fe

xx Sale $ Subsidy

Social Infrastructures

New Zoning & Higher FAR 

Developable Land Assembled

Urbanized Area Redevelopment Scheme in Japan

Lessons

21

Lessons• LVC has evolved from simple rail transit finance into complex

transit-oriented development (TOD);

• There are three important instruments to be arranged around target stations: (i) public land lease/sale; (ii) private land assemblage; & (iii) air right sale/bonus;

• Transit-supportive policies must be consistent across multiple governmental entities (national-metropolitan-city-district & transportation-urban development);

• LVC formulation and TOD planning depend principally on diverse & dynamic market demands;

• Project implementations need to involve experienced private developers as well as local residents; &

• LVC + TOD approach requires a new set of planning instruments & legal frameworks to ensure “win-win” situations for all stakeholders.

41

Questions & Discussion

Jin MurakamiCity University of Hong Kong

[email protected]://www.jinmurakami.net

42