validation of satellite-based estimates of whitecap coverage: approaches and initial results

47
Magdalena D. Anguelova, Justin P. Bobak, William E. Asher, David J. Dowgiallo, Ben I. Moat, Robin W. Pascal, Margaret J. Yelland 16th Conference on Air-Sea 16th Conference on Air-Sea Interaction Interaction 11–15 January 2009, Phoenix, Arizona Validation of Validation of satellite-based satellite-based estimates of whitecap estimates of whitecap coverage: Approaches and coverage: Approaches and initial results initial results Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK

Upload: troy-walls

Post on 30-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

16th Conference on Air-Sea Interaction 11–15 January 2009, Phoenix, Arizona. Validation of satellite-based estimates of whitecap coverage: Approaches and initial results. Magdalena D. Anguelova, Justin P. Bobak, William E. Asher, David J. Dowgiallo, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

Magdalena D. Anguelova,

Justin P. Bobak, William E. Asher, David J. Dowgiallo,

Ben I. Moat, Robin W. Pascal, Margaret J. Yelland

16th Conference on Air-Sea 16th Conference on Air-Sea InteractionInteraction

11–15 January 2009, Phoenix, Arizona Validation of satellite-Validation of satellite-

basedbased

estimates of whitecap estimates of whitecap

coverage: Approaches and coverage: Approaches and

initial resultsinitial results

Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DCApplied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle,

WANational Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK

Page 2: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Long-term goalLong-term goalImprove Sea Salt Source Function parameterization by modeling the high variability of whitecap coverage

CSTUdXTuW scur ,,,,,,, uW

STuW s ,,*

or

u – wind speed (u10 or u*?)T – atmospheric stability (= Tair – Tsea)X – wind fetch

d – wind durationUcur – water currentsTs – sea surface temperatureS – salinityCk – concentration, type (k) of surface active materials

Page 3: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

The first stepThe first step

FrameworkFramework

Improve existing or develop new models; Extensive database: W + various factors; Measurements: W + various factors;

Existing W measurements: Photographs/video images; Insufficient for extensive database;

Alternative approach: From satellites to get global coverage; wide range of meteo & environ conditions;

CSTUdXTUW scur ,,,,,,,Whitecap variability:Whitecap variability:

Page 4: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Daily map of Daily map of WW

Daily data (swath) for entire 2006, months of 2007 and 2008

Page 5: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Retrieving W (changes in TB at microwave frequencies): Using parts of WindSat forward model (v.1.9.6) ;

Rough surface emissivity, er ; Atmospheric variables atm. correction;

Foam emissivity model, ef ;

Independent sources for the input variables: TB from WindSat; V, L from SSM/I or TMI; U10 from QuikSCAT, SSM/I, or GDAS; Ts from GDAS; S = 34 psu;

Improvements over the published feasibility study: More physical models for er, ef, and atm. corr.; Independence of the variables; Minimization of errors.

Satellite-based foam Satellite-based foam fraction fraction WW

Page 6: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

ValidationValidation

Insufficient ground truth values: Data collection:

Slow and expensive; Sporadic and non-systematic;

Limited range of conditions; Fewer in situ-satellite matches in time and space;

Different principles of measurement: Reflectivity in the Visible (photographic/video); Emissivity in the Microwave (radiometer);

Various approaches to circumvent difficulties.

Page 7: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Validation approachesValidation approaches

Historical database of in situ values; Wind speed formula;Ship-borne measurements;Air-borne measurements.

There are questions and issues

with each approach.

Page 8: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

In situIn situ historical data by historical data by typetype

Page 9: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

10 GHz seems good10 GHz seems good

Page 10: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

All Frequencies, H polAll Frequencies, H pol

Page 11: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Satellite vs Wind formulaSatellite vs Wind formula

Wsat more uniform by latitude;

High lat higher W.

March, 2007, 0.5 deg x 0.5 deg

Satellite, 18.7 GHz, H pol.

Wind speed formula: Monahan and O’Muircheartaigh,

1980: U10 from QuikSCAT or GDAS; Time/space matched with WindSat;

41.310

61084.3 UW

Page 12: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Difference mapsDifference mapsWW = = WWsatsat – – WWmodmod

18H10H

+W = 0.041% ; - W = 0.44% +W = 0.61% ; - W = 0.63%

Page 13: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Experiment HiWASE on Polarfront ship positioned at Station M; UK colleagues: Margaret Yelland, Ben Moat and Robin Pascal; Long-term (Sep 2006 to Sep 2009) measurements of W and other

variables; In situ data for W;

Two cameras, daylight restrictions (Mar-Oct); Photographic data processed at 3 intensity thresholds with AWE

technique; Temporally-averaged values in a time window around or close to

WindSat pass time; The effect of time window (minutes to 3 hours) was investigated;

WindSat data for W: Closest pixel to lat/lon position of each in situ point; WindSat low resolution (50 km x 71 km); Three frequencies (10, 18, and 37 GHz), H pol.; The effect of averaging over NºxNº box (e.g., 1/2ºx1/2º) was

investigated;

In situ data for W; Two cameras, daylight restrictions (Mar-Oct); Photographic data processed at 3 intensity thresholds with AWE

technique; Temporally-averaged values in a time window around or close to

WindSat pass time; The effect of time window (minutes to 3 hours) was investigated;

WindSat data for W: Closest pixel to lat/lon position of each in situ point; WindSat low resolution (50 km x 71 km); Three frequencies (10, 18, and 37 GHz), H pol.; The effect of averaging over NºxNº box (e.g., 1/2ºx1/2º) was

investigated;

PolarfrontPolarfront ship data ship data

Page 14: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

In situIn situ historical data by historical data by typetype

Page 15: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

PolarfrontPolarfront to historical to historical in in situsitu

Page 16: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

WindSat matched to WindSat matched to PolarfrontPolarfront

Page 17: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

In situIn situ and satellite winds and satellite winds

180-min time window

Page 18: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

In situIn situ and satellite winds and satellite winds

180-min time window

Page 19: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI ExperimentRASSI Experiment RAdiometry and Sea Surface Imagery (2007):

North Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico (Hurricane Dean); High altitude: 6.7 km (20,000 ft); Clear sky to partial cloud cover;

Radiometric measurements: APMIR (Airborne Polarimetric Microwave Imaging Radiometer) Channels available (GHz): 37VH34, 19VH34, 6.6VH,

6.8VH, 7.2VH (some data at channels at 10.7 and 22.235);

Footprint roughly 1x2 km from on 19 and 37 GHz; Video measurements:

High resolution video camera; Field of view of 159 m by 119 m.

Page 20: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI ExperimentRASSI Experiment RAdiometry and Sea Surface Imagery (2007):

North Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico (Hurricane Dean); High altitude: 6.7 km (20,000 ft); Clear sky to partial cloud cover;

Radiometric measurements: NRL’s APMIR (Airborne Polarimetric Microwave Imaging

Radiometer) Channels available (GHz): 37VH34, 19VH34, 6.6VH,

6.8VH, 7.2VH (some data at channels at 10.7 and 22.235); Footprint roughly 1x2 km from on 19 and 37 GHz;

Video measurements: High resolution video camera; Field of view of 159 m by 119 m.

Page 21: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI ExperimentRASSI Experiment RAdiometry and Sea Surface Imagery (2007):

North Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico (Hurricane Dean); High altitude: 6.7 km (20,000 ft); Clear sky to partial cloud cover;

Radiometric measurements: NRL’s APMIR (Airborne Polarimetric Microwave Imaging

Radiometer) Channels available (GHz): 37VH34, 19VH34, 6.6VH,

6.8VH, 7.2VH (some data at channels at 10.7 and 22.235); Footprint roughly 1x2 km from on 19 and 37 GHz;

Video measurements: UW’s High resolution video camera; Field of view of 159 m by 119 m.

Page 22: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Hurricane Dean flightHurricane Dean flight

KSYP

#6

#7

#42003

#42055

3FPQ9

#1#2

#3

#4#5

Buoy

Ship

RASSI

Page 23: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

In situIn situ historical data by historical data by typetype

Page 24: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI foam vs historical RASSI foam vs historical in in situ situ

Page 25: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI foam vs historical RASSI foam vs historical in in situ situ

Page 26: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI vs WindSat pairsRASSI vs WindSat pairs

Wind dependent AB factor Wind dependent AB factor 11 to 15 11 to 15 using Monahan & Woolf using Monahan & Woolf (1989) parameterizations for (1989) parameterizations for A+B and AA+B and A

Page 27: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI vs WindSat pairsRASSI vs WindSat pairs

Wind dependent AB factor Wind dependent AB factor 11 to 15 11 to 15 using Monahan & Woolf using Monahan & Woolf (1989) parameterizations for (1989) parameterizations for A+B and AA+B and A

Page 28: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Difficulties in validating satellite-based foam fraction; Amount of data; Conditions covered; Principle of measurements;

Compensate using different approaches: Historical in situ data; Wind speed formula; Direct validation with APMIR/video data; Direct validation with ship data;

Results: Ball-park in magnitude compared to in situ data; More uniform latitudinally than wind formula; Direct validation shows:

underestimate at low winds and over estimate at high winds; How much of this result is correct?

Future work: More match-ups of in situ and satellite data; Indirect validation (with other variables, not directly W); Tuning of the satellite-based algorithm.

SummarySummary

Compensate using different approaches: Historical in situ data; Wind speed formula; Direct validation with ship-borne photographic data; Direct validation with air-borne video data;

Results: Ball-park in magnitude compared to in situ data; More uniform latitudinally than wind formula; Direct validation shows:

Wsat overestimate at low winds and Relatively good estimate at high winds;

Future work: More match-ups of in situ and satellite data; Indirect validation (with other variables, not directly W); Tuning of the satellite-based algorithm.

Page 29: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Additional slidesAdditional slides

Page 30: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Match-up issuesMatch-up issues

Only 4 full swaths: from GDAS, Large temporal

mismatch for other GDAS match-ups;

Chunks of swaths for most passes: due to QuikSCAT passes

CROSSING the WindSAT passes;

Reflects on the number of samples available for low and high latitudes.

Sample count

Page 31: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Samples available for 1 Samples available for 1 monthmonth

Sample count

High latitudes with high winds are under represented.

Page 32: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Frequency and polarization Frequency and polarization

dependencedependence Understanding the info

each freq and pol gives for W: Research foam skin depth; The effect of foam

thickness on the skin depth and foam emissivity;

The results could be important for gas exchange (CO2 and other gases);

Combining suitable freqs and pols in one “oceanographically” representative W;

Page 33: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Compare to Compare to in situin situ A+B data A+B data

Page 34: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Low freqs close to Low freqs close to in situin situ A+BA+B

Page 35: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

18 GHz18 GHz Very similar to 23 GHz Atmosphere influence?

Page 36: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

All frequencies, V polAll frequencies, V pol

Page 37: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

All Frequencies, H polAll Frequencies, H pol

Page 38: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

BiasesBiasesPair binned

data;W = Wsat-

Wins;Plot bins with

high count.

Freq (GHz), H pol.61018232337

Page 39: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Satellite vs Wind formulaSatellite vs Wind formula

March, 2007 0.5 deg x 0.5 deg

Wind speed formula

Satellite, 10.7 GHz, H pol.

Page 40: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Ship cruisesShip cruises

Two ship cruises in 2006 and 2007 Ian Brooks and Margaret

Yelland, UK: Data for:

Foam fraction – direct validation;

Sea-salt aerosol flux – indirect val.

Matchups with WindSat data Spatial and temporal; Video data availability for

about 10 points; Cruise data still processed

Page 41: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

In situIn situ and satellite winds and satellite winds (raw)(raw)

Page 42: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Binned by wind speedBinned by wind speed

Page 43: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Compare Compare in situin situ – satellite – satellite pairspairs

Page 44: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Compare Compare in situin situ – satellite – satellite pairspairs

Page 45: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

RASSI measuring RASSI measuring configurationconfiguration

37 GHz station 2

-87.45

-87.4

-87.35

-87.3

-87.25

-87.2

-87.15

-87.1

-87.05

25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 25.7

all points

points averaged

Page 46: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Wind speed conditionsWind speed conditions

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Station

Win

d s

pee

d, U

10 (

m/s

)

WindSat

SSMI

QuikSCAT

GDAS

Buoys

Ships

Page 47: Validation of satellite-based estimates of  whitecap coverage:  Approaches and initial results

16th Air-Sea Interaction Conference, 14 January, 2009, Anguelova et al.

Wind vector field during the Wind vector field during the flightflight

12

34

5

67

12

34

5

67

12

34

5

67