validating a “term bmi” using mode of delivery, estimated blood loss, and neonatal weight
DESCRIPTION
Validating a “Term BMI” using Mode of Delivery, Estimated Blood Loss, and Neonatal Weight. Diana Garretto, MD & Erin Stevens, MD State University of New York at Stony Brook University Medical Center Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Medicine. Results. Tables. Background. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Validating a “Term BMI” using Mode of Delivery, Estimated Blood Loss, and Neonatal WeightValidating a “Term BMI” using Mode of Delivery, Estimated Blood Loss, and Neonatal Weight
Diana Garretto, MD & Erin Stevens, MD State University of New York at Stony Brook University Medical CenterDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Medicine
In non-pregnant populations, underweight is a BMI <18.5, normal weight is a BMI 18.5-24.9, overweight is a BMI 25-29.9, and obese is a BMI>30. The “Term BMI” was calculated by adding the respective IOM weight gain recommendations of each category to each pregnancy at term.
A single institution retrospective chart review was then performed of patients who delivered at term (>=37 weeks) from July 2009 to January 2010 was performed to validate the use of a Term BMI. Data included height, pre-pregnancy weight, maternal delivery weight, mode of delivery, neonatal weight, and estimated blood loss.
TablesTablesTablesTables
ConclusionsConclusions
Study DesignStudy Design
To validate using a “Term BMI” instead of pre-pregnancy BMI to evaluate for risk of blood loss, LGA fetus, and cesarean section on day of delivery.
ResultsResults
Based on the IOM guidelines, a patient would be considered underweight if the BMI at term was <23.5, normal weight if the BMI at term was 23.5-29.9, overweight if the BMI at term was 30-33.5 and obese if the BMI at term was >33.5. These were used as the “Term BMI” categories.
1,031 patients met inclusion criteria. The data was analyzed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra Test. There was a significant increase in risk of cesarean section with increasing BMI in both the pre-pregnancy and Term BMI groups (Table 1). There was also a significant increase in estimated blood loss (Table 2) and neonatal weight (Table 3) with increasing BMI in both the pre-pregnancy and Term BMI groups.
.
Using the “Term BMI” at the time of delivery may be an easier and more accurate way to objectively assess risks of obesity at term than pre-pregnancy weight or BMI alone.
The “Term BMI” allows calculation of a woman’s BMI the actual day of delivery and can help to predict complications associated with delivery including mode of delivery, neonatal weight, and estimated blood loss.
BMIC-Section
RatePre-
pregnancy
C-Section Rate Term
Normal Weight 27.79% 28.64%
Overweight 31.87% 28.93%
Obese 42.27% 40.5%
P-value 0.0026 0.0033
BMIEBL Mean
Pre-pregnancy
EBL Mean Term
Normal weight 589 573
Overweight 636 627
Obese 727 731
P-value 0.0002 <0.0001
BMINeonatal
weight MeanPre-
pregnancy
Neonatal weight Mean
Term
Normal weight 3405 3366
Overweight 3420 3436
Obese 3466 3510
P-value 0.0168 <0.0001
Table 1Table 1
Table 2Table 2
Table 3Table 3
Among non-pregnant women age 20-39, 25% of them are overweight and 28% are obese, and 6% have a BMI >= to 40. Issues begin with pre-conception with infertility etc to antepartum issues including GDM and anomalies through intrapartum problems. Postpartum issues include increased risk for venous thrombosis, etc.
ObjectiveObjective
BackgroundBackground