vaginal repair of apical prolapse mesh kit vs. vaginal suture repair marie fidela r. paraiso, m.d....

21
Vaginal Repair of Apical Vaginal Repair of Apical Prolapse Mesh Kit vs. Prolapse Mesh Kit vs. Vaginal Suture Repair Vaginal Suture Repair Marie Fidela R. Paraiso, M.D. Marie Fidela R. Paraiso, M.D. Head, Division of Urogynecology Head, Division of Urogynecology Professor of Surgery Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at at Case Western Reserve University Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH Cleveland, OH

Upload: charla-lindsey

Post on 13-Jan-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Vaginal Repair of Apical Prolapse Vaginal Repair of Apical Prolapse

Mesh Kit vs. Vaginal Suture RepairMesh Kit vs. Vaginal Suture Repair

Marie Fidela R. Paraiso, M.D.Marie Fidela R. Paraiso, M.D.

Head, Division of UrogynecologyHead, Division of Urogynecology

Professor of SurgeryProfessor of Surgery

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at

Case Western Reserve UniversityCase Western Reserve University

Cleveland, OHCleveland, OH

DisclosuresDisclosures

NoneNone

Food for ThoughtFood for Thought

Best practices are difficult to define when Best practices are difficult to define when discussing innovation because of lack of discussing innovation because of lack of data to support newer kit procedures.data to support newer kit procedures.

However, quality data are lacking with However, quality data are lacking with respect to traditional suture repair respect to traditional suture repair procedures as well.procedures as well.

Comparative data show that synthetic mesh Comparative data show that synthetic mesh implantation in the anterior wall results in implantation in the anterior wall results in better anatomic cure rates.better anatomic cure rates.

ICUD Modification of Oxford SystemICUD Modification of Oxford System

Levels of Evidence Levels of Evidence

1.1. RCTsRCTs

2.2. Prospective cohortProspective cohort

3.3. Retrospective case controlRetrospective case control

4.4. Case seriesCase series

5.5. Expert opinion without evidenceExpert opinion without evidence

**Pelvic Organ ProlapsePelvic Organ Prolapse

Approximately half of women 50 and older Approximately half of women 50 and older are affected. are affected.

Women feel their pelvic organs bulging or Women feel their pelvic organs bulging or protruding out of the vaginal opening and protruding out of the vaginal opening and may experience pelvic pain.may experience pelvic pain.

Urination and/or bowel movements may Urination and/or bowel movements may be difficult.be difficult.

Women may also experience pain with Women may also experience pain with intercourse and decreased body image.intercourse and decreased body image.

EnterocoeleEnterocoele

Repairs Requiring Graft Repairs Requiring Graft Augmentation or “Kits” for Augmentation or “Kits” for

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePelvic Organ Prolapse

Current Vaginal Mesh Kits with TrocarsCurrent Vaginal Mesh Kits with Trocars

Prolift® System Avaulta® System

Perigee® Sling /Apogee® Sling

Apogee and Perigee are registered trademarks of AMS Research Corporation. | Avaulta is a registered trademark of C.R. Bard, Inc. | Gynecare Prolift is a registered trademark of Johnson & Johnson Corporation

Potential LimitationsPotential Limitations• Blind pass of needles Blind pass of needles

through unfamiliar anatomythrough unfamiliar anatomy• Proximity to neurovascular Proximity to neurovascular

structuresstructures

• Vaginal apex support• Extent of anterior vaginal

wall support unless modified

• Gap failure

Many surgeons have switched to trocarless kits without any data!

Mesh Systems without TrocarsMesh Systems without Trocars

Sacrospinous Ligament

Arcus Tendineous

Pinnacle® Pelvic Floor Repair Kit

Capio® Suture Capturing Device

Uphold Procedure

Prosima—non fixated with VSD

Society for Gynecologic Surgeons Society for Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group Guidelines Systematic Review Group Guidelines

Obstet Gynecol 112(5):1123-30, 2008Obstet Gynecol 112(5):1123-30, 2008 Biologic grafts and absorbable synthetic grafts offer Biologic grafts and absorbable synthetic grafts offer

no advantage over native tissue repair for anterior no advantage over native tissue repair for anterior or posterior vaginal wallor posterior vaginal wall

No data to guide recommendations regarding non-No data to guide recommendations regarding non-absorbable synthetic mesh in the posterior wall or absorbable synthetic mesh in the posterior wall or for vaginal apical suspension.for vaginal apical suspension.

It is suggested that non-absorbable synthetic mesh It is suggested that non-absorbable synthetic mesh may improve anatomic outcomes of anterior vaginal may improve anatomic outcomes of anterior vaginal wall repair, but there are trade-offs in regards to the wall repair, but there are trade-offs in regards to the risk of adverse eventsrisk of adverse events

249 articles249 articles19 conference abstracts19 conference abstracts

249 articles249 articles19 conference abstracts19 conference abstracts

160 articles excluded

Traditional vaginalTraditional vaginal54 studies54 studies

Sacral colpopexySacral colpopexy43 studies43 studies

Vaginal mesh kitsVaginal mesh kits24 studies24 studies

89 articles89 articles19 conference abstracts19 conference abstracts

includedincluded

89 articles89 articles19 conference abstracts19 conference abstracts

includedincluded

Systematic Review of Apical Prolapse SurgeriesSystematic Review of Apical Prolapse SurgeriesDiwadkar et al, 2009, Obstet Gynecol 2009, 113:3670-73.Diwadkar et al, 2009, Obstet Gynecol 2009, 113:3670-73.

Conclusions of ReviewConclusions of ReviewTraditional vaginal procedures Traditional vaginal procedures

Highest reoperation rate for prolapse recurrenceHighest reoperation rate for prolapse recurrence

Lowest rates of complications that required surgical Lowest rates of complications that required surgical

intervention intervention

Lowest total reoperation rateLowest total reoperation rate

Vaginal mesh kits Vaginal mesh kits Shortest follow-up periodShortest follow-up period

Highest rate of complications that required surgical Highest rate of complications that required surgical

interventionintervention

Highest total reoperation rate (recurrence + complications)Highest total reoperation rate (recurrence + complications)

Graft ImplantsGraft Implants

Inert, inactive, permanent materials

Bioactive, conductive, remodeling tissues

Cellular: regenerate or signal to scaffold

Tissue and organ engineering

Anatomy ≠ Function

Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: No Mesh or Mesh?No Mesh or Mesh?

Sacral colpopexy and mid-urethral slings are the most Sacral colpopexy and mid-urethral slings are the most

proven surgeries using meshproven surgeries using mesh

Grafts tend to improve anatomic success in most prolapse Grafts tend to improve anatomic success in most prolapse

repairs, but there is usually no significant difference in QOL repairs, but there is usually no significant difference in QOL

and sexual function after traditional vs. mesh surgeryand sexual function after traditional vs. mesh surgery

Grafts always increase complications and cost but many Grafts always increase complications and cost but many

surgeons use vaginal grafts routinely and with great successsurgeons use vaginal grafts routinely and with great success

Surgeons should use what is best in their hands Surgeons should use what is best in their hands

What are we doing at the What are we doing at the Cleveland Clinic?Cleveland Clinic?

Route of Surgery:Route of Surgery: Vaginal 65%, Laparoscopic 20%, Robotic 10%, Open 5%Vaginal 65%, Laparoscopic 20%, Robotic 10%, Open 5%

I do most kit procedures in our division: uterine I do most kit procedures in our division: uterine sparing, recurrent, non-sexually active, co-sparing, recurrent, non-sexually active, co-morbid, vaginal route indicated or preferredmorbid, vaginal route indicated or preferred

Referral center mesh removal (kits, Referral center mesh removal (kits, augmentation)augmentation)

We have been doing robotic surgery in Gyn since We have been doing robotic surgery in Gyn since 2000; for prolapse since 20062000; for prolapse since 2006

Tend to be “early adopters” but with a skeptical Tend to be “early adopters” but with a skeptical eye; “early studiers” so we can make eye; “early studiers” so we can make recommendations on “Best Practice”recommendations on “Best Practice”

Concluding CommentsConcluding Comments

I believe that augmented vaginal repairs and I believe that augmented vaginal repairs and robotic surgery will continue to be part of the robotic surgery will continue to be part of the future of pelvic reconstructive surgery but future of pelvic reconstructive surgery but not in their current form.not in their current form. New innovations in these technologies are already on New innovations in these technologies are already on

the way!the way! New biocompatible mesh, flexible-single port robots, New biocompatible mesh, flexible-single port robots,

stem cell therapy, gene therapy and biomarkers are in stem cell therapy, gene therapy and biomarkers are in development!development!

When adopting innovative techniques When adopting innovative techniques

into your surgical practice:into your surgical practice: Do your homework: Review the available literature Do your homework: Review the available literature

& package insert& package insert Go to a training sessionGo to a training session Have your first 5-10 procedures proctored by a Have your first 5-10 procedures proctored by a

surgeon experienced in the techniquesurgeon experienced in the technique Inform the patientInform the patient Critically reflect on your experienceCritically reflect on your experience

Track your outcomesTrack your outcomes Keep up on the new dataKeep up on the new data Talk to colleaguesTalk to colleagues

Thanks for your attention!