uva-dare (digital academic repository) polysemy or ... · pdf fileinin het moderne russisch....

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitiveconstruction in RussianFortuin, E.L.J.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Fortuin, E. L. J. (2001). Polysemy or monosemy: Interpretation of the imperative and the dative-infinitiveconstruction in Russian Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 14 May 2018

http://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/polysemy-or-monosemy-interpretation-of-the-imperative-and-the-dativeinfinitive-construction-in-russian(1f078cc9-1311-457b-be65-cdb493008114).html

References s

ANSANS (Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst), 1984. Geerts, G. et al. (eds). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff. .

Apresjan,, Ju.D. 1992. Leksikograficheslde portrety (na primere glagola byt). In: Inform. processyprocessy i sistemy 3,20-33.

Apresjan,, Ju. D. & Iomdin, L.L. 1989. Konstrukcija tipa negde spat': Sintaksis, semantika, leksikografija.. In: Nesterov, P.V. (ed) Semiotika i informatika 29, 34—92. Moskva: Viniti .

Archangeli,, D. & Langendoen, D.T. 1997. Optimality Theory: An overview. Malden, MA: BlackwelL L

Armstrong,, S.L., Gleitman, L. & Gleitman, H. 1983. What some concepts might not be. In:: Cognition 13,263-308.

Baranov,, A.N. & Kobozeva, I.M. 1983. Semantika obshchix voprosov v russkom jazyke (kategorijaa ustanovki). In: I^yestijaAN SSSK, Serija Literatury ija^yka 42(3), 263-274.

Barbiers,, S. 1995. The syntax of interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, HIL , Leiden University. Thee Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Barentsen,, A. 1985. Tijd\ 'aspect' en de conjunctie poka: Over betekenis en gebruik van enkele vormen inin het moderne Russisch. Doctoral dissertation: University of Amsterdam.

Barentsen,, A. forthcoming. In: Houtzagers, P. (ed.) Handboek Russische grammatica. Bussum: Coutinho. .

Bartsch,, R. 1984. The structure of word-meaning. Polysemy, metaphor, metonymy. In: Landman, F. && Veltman, F. (eds) Varieties of formal semantics, 24—55. Dordrecht Foris.

Bartsch,, R. 1996. The myth of literal meaning. In: Weigand, E. & Hundsnurscher, F. (eds) LexicalLexical structures and language use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Lexicology and LexicalLexical Semantics. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.

505 5

References References

Bartsch,, R. 1998. Dynamic conceptual semantics: A logico-philosophical investigation into concept formationformation and understanding. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Belevitskaya-Khalizeva,, V.S. 1965. Exercises in Russian syntax: Compound and complex sentences, Moscow:: Progress.

Birjulin ,, L.A. 1993. Sintakticheskoe predstavlenie russkogo impersonala (tipa svetaet): K istoriii i teorii voprosa. In: Russian Linguistics 17,181—203.

Birjulin ,, L. 1994. Semantika i pragmatika russkogo imperativa. Helsinki: Department of Slavonicc languages, University of Helsinki.

Bondarko,, A.V. 1990. Teorija junkcionahoj grammatiki, tempora/'nost' moda/'nost'. Leningrad: Izdavel'stvoo Nauka.

Bondarko,, A.V. 1991. Functional grammar, si field approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. .

Bondarko,, A.V. & Bulanin, L. 1967. Russkij glagol. Leningrad: Prosveshchenie. Bonnot,, C.I. & Fougeron, I. 1982. L'accent de phrase initial en russe est-il toujours un

signee d'expressivité ou de familiarité? In: Bulletin de la Sociétê de Unguistique de Paris 87(1),, 309-330.

Borkovskij,, V.I. 1978. Istoricheskaja grammatika russkogo ja^yka. Sintaksis. Prostoe predlo^henie. Moskva:: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.

Bricyn,, V.M. 1990. Sintaksis i semantika infinitiva v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Kiev: Naukovaa Dumka.

Bulygina,, T.V. 1982. K postroeniju tipologii predikatov v russkom jazyke. In: Seliverstova, O.N.. (ed.) Semantichkskie tipypredikatov, 14-21. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.

Bulygina,, T.V. & Shmelev, A.D. Ja^ykovaja konceptuali^acija mira (na materiale russkojgramma-tiki).tiki). Moskva: Shkola Jazyki Russkoj kul'tury'.

Buslaev,, F.I. 1959. Istoricheskaja grammatika. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe Uchebno-pedagogicheskoee Izdatel'stvo Ministerstva Prosveshchenija RSFSR

Bybee,, J. & Fleischman, S. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Johnn Benjamins.

Bybee,, J. & Pagliuca, W. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammaticall meaning. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) Historical semantics: Historical word-formation, 59— 83.. Berlin, etc.: Mouton.

Cejtlin,, S.N. 1980. Sposoby vyrazhenija psixicheskogo sostojanija sub"ekta v russkom jazyke.. In: Russkij jav^k %a Rube^hom 2, 84-87.

Chagisheva,, V.I. 1971. Istorija vtorogo datel'nogo sushchestvitel'nogo v russkom jazyke (XI-XV II w ). In: Bogorodskij, B.L. et al. (eds) Grammatika i leksika russkogo jaqyka, 210-232.. Leningrad: Pedagogicheskij Institut Gercena.

506 6


Chvany,, V.C. 1975. On the syntax ofBE-sentences in Russian. Cambridge, MA: Slavica. Comrie,, B. 1974. The second dative: A transformational approach. In: Brecht, R. &

Chvany,, C. (eds) Slavic transformational syntax, 123-150. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan. .

Coseriu,, E. 1966. Tomo y me vof: Ein Problem vergleichender europaischer Syntax. In: VoxVox Romanica 25,13—55.

Damerow,, P. 1996. Abstraction and representation: Essays on the cultural evolution of thinking. Dordrecht,, etc.: Kluwer.

Dancygier,, B. & Sweetser, E. 1996. Conditionals, distancing, and alternative spaces. In: Goldberg,, A. (ed.) Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 83-98. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. .

Dik,, S.C. 1989. The theory of junctional grammar, part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht Foris. .

Dippong,, H. 1995. Zum Subjekt von Imperativsatzen. In: Dippong, H. (ed) Unguistische BeitrdgeBeitrdge %ur Slavistik aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schwei ̂ 47-61. München: Otto Sagner. .

Donhauser,, K. 1986. Derlmperativ im Deutschen. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. Ebeling,, C.L. 1956. On the verbal predicate in Russian. In: Halle, M. (ed) For Roman

Jakobson:Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 86—88. The Hague: Mouton & Co. Ebeling,, C.L. 1978. Syntax and semantics: A taxonomie approach. Leiden: Brill . Ebeling,, C.L. 1984. On the meaning of the Russian infinitive. In: Van Baak, J.J. (ed) Signs

ofof friendship, 97-130. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Ekberg,, L. 1993. The cognitive basis of the meaning and function of cross-linguistic take

andand V. In: Belgian Journal of Linguistics 8 ,23- 42. Fauconnier,, G. & Sweetser, E. 1996. Spaces worlds and grammar. Chicago/London: The Uni-

versityy of Chicago Press. Fillmore,, C. 1968. Hie case for case. In: Bach, E. and Harms, R.T. (eds) Universals in

linguisticlinguistic theory, 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Fodor,, J. 1976. The language of thought. Hassocks: The Harvester Press. Fooien,, A. 1993. De betekenis van partikels. Doctoral disseration, University of Nijmegen. Formanovskaja,, N.I. 1989. Slo^hnoepredloyhenie. Moskva: Russkij Jazyk. Forsyth,, J. 1970. A grammar of aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Franks,, S. 1990. Case, configuration, and argumenthood Reflections on the second

dative.. In: Russian Linguistics 14,231-254. Garda,, E. 1975. The role of theory in linguistic analysis: The Spanish pronoun system. Amsterdam/-

Oxfordd North-Holland

507 7


Garde,, P. 1963. L'emploi du conditionalet de laparticuk by en russe. Aix-en-Provence: Editions Ophrys. .

Giannakidou,, A. 1997. The landscape of polarity items. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 18.. Groningen: Grodil.

Ginsburg,, H.P. &c Opper, S. 1988. Piaget's theory of intellectual development. Third edition. Englewoodd Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Givón,, T. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press. Givón,, T. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:

Johnn Benjamins. Givón,, T. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Goddard,, C. 1998. Bad arguments against semantic primitives. In: Theoretical Linguistics

24(2/3),, 129-156. Goldberg,, A.E. 1995. Constructions. A construction approach to argument structure. Chicago/-

London:: The University of Chicago Press. Haiman,, J. 1985. Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press. . Hansen,, B. 1998. Modalauxiliare in den slavischen Sprachen. In: Zeitschriftfur Slawistik 43,

3,, 249-374. Haverkate,, W.H. 1979. Impositive sentences in Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Hinrkhs,, U. 1983. Die sogenannten 'Vvodnye Slova' (Schalwörter/Modalwörter) im Russischen.

Wiesbaden:: Otto Harrassowitz. Isachenko,, A.V. 1957. K voprosu ob imperative v russkom jazyke. In: Russkij ]a%yk v

ShkoleShkole 6,7-11. Isachenko,, A.V. 1960. Grammaticheskij stro/ russkogo ja%yka v sopostavlenii s slovackim:

Morfohgtja,Morfohgtja, chast' vtoraja. Bratislava: Slovackoj Akademii Nauk. Isachenko,, A.V. 1982. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart: Formenlehre. Fourth edition.

München:: s.n. Issatchenko,, A.V. 1983. Geschichte der russischen Sprache, Vol. 2. Birnbaum, H. et al

(eds).. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag. Jakobson,, R. 1960. Der Doppelcharakter der Sprache: Die Polaritat zwischen Metaphorik

undd Metonymik. In: Ihwe, J. (ed) Literaturwissenschaft und Unguistik, Vol. 1: Grundkgen undund Vorausset^ungen, 323-333. Frankfurt: Athenaum.

Jakobson,, R. 1971. Morfologocheskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem (sostav russkixx padezhnyx form). In: Selected writings, Vol. 2, Word and language, 154-183. Moscow,, etc.: Mouton.

Jakobson,, R. 1995 [1936]. Contribution to the general theory of case. In: Waugh, L.R. and

508 8


Monville-Burston,, M. (eds), On language, 332-385. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard Universityy Press.

Jarceva,, V.N.1990. LinguisticheskijèncekJopedicheskijsJovar'. Moskva: Sovetskaja Endklopedija. Jurovskij,, V. 1996. Bessqju^nye slo^hnyepredlo^henifa v direktivnyx rechevyx aktax. Bern: Lang. Junghanns,, U. 1994. Syntaktische und semantische Eigenschaften Russischer finaler Infinitiveinbet-

tungen.tungen. Slavistische Beitrage 315. München: Otto Sagner. Karcevski,, S. 1927. Système du verbe Russe. Prague: Legiografie. Keenan,, EX. 1976. Towards a universal definition of 'subject5. In: Li , C. (ed.) Subject and

topictopictt 305-333. New York: Academic Press. Keijsper,, C.E. 1985. Information structure. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Keijsper,, C.E. 1994. From accent to transitivity. In: Dutch contributions to the Eleventh

InternationalInternational Congress ofSlavists, Bratislava (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 22), 193-329.. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Kiparsky,, V. 1963. Russische historische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter. Kogtaj,, I. 1968. K voprosu ob invariantnom qtachenii form russkogo imperativa. In: Ruzhichka, J.

(ed.)) Recueil linguistique de Bratislava, 159-167. Bratislava: Vydavatel'stvo Slovenskej Akadémiee Vied.

Komar,, E.S. 1999. Dative subject in Russian revisited: Are all datives created equal? In: Dziwirek,, K. et al (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The SeattleSeattle Meeting 1998,245-264. Ann Arbor, MI : Michigan Slavic Publications.

Kompeer,, K. 1992. A note on word order and its meaning: SPIT BABUSHKA versus BABUSHKAA SPIT. In: Studies in Russian Linguistics, 215-225.

Kondrashova,, N. 1994. Agreement and dative subjects in Russian. In: Avrutin, S. et al (eds)) Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The MIT'Meeting 1993, 255-285.. Ann Arbor, MI : Michigan Slavic Publications.

Kovtunova,, I.I. & Shvedova, N.Ju. 1986. Voeticheskij sintaksis. Moskva: IzdateFstvo Akademiii Nauk SSSR, Institut Russkogo Jazyka.

Lakoff,, G. 1990 [1987]. Women, fire and dangerous things. What categpries reveal about the mind. Chicago/London:: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff,, G. & Johnson, M 1980. Metaphors we life by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicagoo Press.

Lakoff,, G. & Johnson, M 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to westernwestern thought. New York: Basic Books.

Langacker,, R.W. 1991a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford Universityy Press.

Langacker,, R.W. 1991b. Concept, image, and symbol' The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin/New

509 9


York:: Mouton de Gruyter. Langacker,, R.W. 1999. Indeterminacy in semantics and grammar. In: Cifuentes Honrubia,

J.L.. (ed.) Estudios de linguistica cognitiva, Vol. 2, 649-672. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante. .

Leech,, G. 1989. The principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman. Levinson,, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press. Levontina,, LB. Slovar'nye stat'i chasticy -KA i sushchestvitel'nogo mesjac. In: Semiotika i

informatikainformatika 32,136-140. Lubensky,, S. 1995. Russian-English dictionary of idioms. New York: Random House. Matsumoto,, Y. 1996. Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and

linguisticc bases. In: Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds) Spaces, worlds and grammar, 124—156.. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

Maurice,, F. 1995. Zur Verteilung von Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit im russischen modalenn Infinitiv . In: Dippong, H. (ed.) Unguistische Beitrdge yur Slavistik, 147-158. München:: Otto Sagner.

Maurice,, F. 1996. Der modale Infinitiv in der modernen russischen Standardsprache. München: Otto Sagner. .

Mazon,, A. 1914. Emplois des aspects du verbe russe. Doctoral dissertation, Faculté des lettres, Universityy of Paris.

Mets,, N.A. 1985. Prakticheskajagrammatika russkogoja^ka. Moskva: Russkij Jazyk. Model,, J. 1991. Grammatische analyse. Dordrecht: Foris. Muravickaja,, M.P. 1973. Polisemija imperativa. In: Matematicheskaja linguistika, Vol. 1, 50-

60.. Kiev: IzdateFstvo Kievskogo Universiteta. Murav'eva,, L.S. 1984. O leksicheskoj sochetaemosti glagolov dvizhenija. In: Russkij ja%yk

%a%a Rube^hom 1, 66-71. Neidle,, C. 1982. Case agreement in Russian. In: Bresnan, J. (ed.) The mental representation of

grammaticalgrammatical relations, 391^26, Cambridge, MA: MI T Press. Neidle,, C. 1988. The role of case in Russian syntax. Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer. Nikiforov,, S.D. 1952. Glagol— ego kategorii i formy v russkom pis'mennosti vtorojpoloviny XVI

veka.veka. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR Osipova,, L.E. 1992. Otnositel'nye konstrukcii s chasticej ni v sovremennom russkom ja^yke. Tver':

Tverskijj Gosudarstvennyj Universitet Paducheva,, E.V. 1996. Semanticheskoe isskdovanija: Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom ja^yke;

semantikasemantika narrativa. Moskva: Shkola ^Jazyki russkoj kul'tury'. Palmer,, F.R. 1981. Semantics. Cambridge: University Press. Palva,, H. 1977. The descriptive imperative of narrative style in Spoken Arabic. In: Folia

510 0


OrientaüaOrientaüa 18, 5-26. Pahra,, H. 1984. Further notes on the descriptive imperative of narrative style in Spoken

Arabic.. In: Studia Orientaüa edited by the Finnish Oriental Society 55, 379-391. Percov,, N.V. 1998. K probleme invarianta grammaticheskogo znachenija II : Imperativ v

russkomm jazyke. In: Voprosy Ja%yho%nanija 2, 88—101. Peshkovskij,, A.M. 1956. Russkijsintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii. Moskva: Uchpedgiz. Proeme,, H. 1991. Over de Nederlandse imperativus. In: Studies over het Poolse, Nederlandse en

RussischeRussische werkwoord, 33-53. Leiden: Vakgroep Slavische Taal- en Letterkunde Rijksuni-versiteitt Leiden.

Proeme,, H. forthcoming. In: Houtzagers, P. (ed.) Handboek Russische grammatica. Bussum: Coutinho. .

Prokopovich,, E.N. 1969. Stilistika chaste/ rechi. Moskva: Prosveshchenie. Rappaport,, G.C. 1985. Aspect and modality in the context of negation. In: Flier S. &

Timberlake,, A. (eds) The scope of 'Slavic aspect, 194—223. Columbus, OH: Slavica. Rosch,, E. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In:

Moore,, T. (ed.) Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 111—144. New York Academicc Press.

Rosch,, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (eds) Cognition and categorization,categorization, 27-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rubinstein,, G. 1986. Subjective dative in Russian infinitival clauses of purpose. In: Slavic andand East European Journal 30(3), 367-379.

RusskajaRusskaja Grammatika, 1980. Shvedova, N.Ju. (ed.), Vols 1-2. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka. Rüzichka,, R. 1994. Asymmetry and parallelism between affirmative and negative (ne) (est)

gdegde spat'. In: Russian Linguistics 18(1), 53-72. Sanders,, J. & Redeker, G. 1996. Perspective and the representation of speech and thought

inn narrative discourse. In: Fauconnier, G. & Sweetser, E. (eds) Spaces, worlds and grammar,grammar, 290-317. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

Sandra,, D. & Rice, S. 1995. Network analyses of prepositional meanings: Mirroring whose mindd — the linguist's or the language user's? In: Cognitive Linguistics 6(1), 89—130.

Scholz,, F. 1973. Russian impersonal expressions used with reference to a person. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. .

Schoorlemmer,, M. 1994. Dative subjects in Russian. In: J. Toman (ed.) Annual Workshop onon Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Ann Arbor Meeting: Functional categories in SlavicSlavic syntax, 400-422. Ann Arbor, MI : Michigan Slavic Publications.

Schoorlemmer,, M 1995. Participial passive and aspect in Russian. Utrecht OTS. Searle,, J. 1975. A classification of Elocutionary Acts. In: Language and Society 5,1—23.

511 1


Searle,J.. 1991 [1983]. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle,, J. 1979. Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and thought, 92-123. Cambridge:

Cambridgee University Press. Shatunovskij,, LB. 1996. Semantika predlozhenija i nereferentnye slova. Moskva: Shkola ^azyki

russkojj kul'tury'. Sheljakin,, M.A. 1986. Russkije mestoimenija. Tartu: Tartuskij Gosudarstvennyj Universitet. Shmelëv,, D.N. 1961. Vneimperativnoe upotreblenie formy povelitel'nogo naklonenija v

sovremennomm russkom ja2yke. In: RusskijJa^yk v Shkole 5, 50-55. Shvedova,, N. Ju. 1955. Nekotorye vidy znachenij skazuemogo v sovremennom russkom

jazyke.. In: Pospelov, N.S. & Svedova, N.Ju. (eds) Issledovanija po grammatike ruskogo literaturnogoja%yka,literaturnogoja%yka, l^l—'bAX. Moskva: IzdateFstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.

Shvedova,, N.Ju. 1967. Paradigmatika prostogo predlozhenija v sovremennom russkom jazyke.. In: Russkij jazyk: Grammaticheskie Issledovanija, 3—77. Moskva: IzdateFstvo Nauka. .

Shvedova,, N.Ju. 1974. O dolzhenstvovatel'nom naklonenii. In: Zolotova, G.A. (ed.) SintaksisSintaksis i norma, 107—121. Moskva: IzdateFstvo Nauka.

Siewierska,, A. 1988. Word order rules. New York: Croom Helm. Signorini,, S. 1993. Infinitivnye predlozhenija v russkom jazyke Rossii pervoj poloviny

XVI II veka. In: Fid Giusti, F. & Signorini, S. (eds) Kategorija skazuemogo v slavjanskix ja^ykax:ja^ykax: Modal'nost'i aktuaü\acija, 195-207. München: Otto Sagner.

Sirotinina,, O.V. 1965. Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke. Saratov: Izdatel'stvo Saratovskogo Universiteta. .

Smith,, M.B. 1994. Agreement and iconicity in Russian impersonal constructions. In: CognitiveCognitive Linguistics 5, 5—56.

Slovar'RusskogoSlovar'Russkogo Ja^yka, 1981-1984. Evgen'evoj, A.P. (ed.), Vols. 1-4. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka. .

Sobolevskij,, A.I. 1962 [1907]. Lekciipo istorii russkagojaqyka. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co. Steedman,, J.M. 1977. Verb, time and modality. In: Cognitive Science 1, 216-234. Stender-Peterson,, A. 1930. O perv%hitochnyx sledax aorista v slavjanskix ja%ykax,

preimuchestvennopreimuchestvenno v russkom. Acta Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis, Humaniora 18. .

Sweetser,, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sweetser,, E. 1996. Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In:

Fauconnier,, G. and Sweetser, E. (eds) Spaces, world and grammmar, 318—333. Chicago/London:: The University of Chicago Press.

Talmy,, L. 1985. Force dynamics in language and thought In: Papen from the Parasession on

512 2


CausativesCausatives andAgentivity, 293-337. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Tarlanov,, Z.K. 1982. Ocherkipo sintaksisu russkixposlovic. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningrad-

skogoo Universiteta. Timofeev,, FLA.. 1950. Ob osnovnyx tipax infinitivnyx predlozhenij v sovremennom

russkomm literaturnom jazyke. In: Vinogradov, V.V. (ed) Voptvsy sintaksisa sovremennogo russkogorusskogo jaqyka, 257—301. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe Uchebno-Pedagogicheskoe Izda-tel'stvo. .

Vann der Auwera J. & Plungian, V. 1998. On modality's semantic map. In: Linguistic TypologyTypology 2,79-124.

Vann der Wouden, T. 1994. Negative contexts. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 12. Groningen:: GrodiL

Vasil'eva,, A.N. 1969. Glagol v razgovornoj rechi. In: Russkij ]a%yk %a Rube^hom, 39—44. Vasilyeva,, A.N. 1972. Particles in colloquial Russian Moscow: Progress. Vaulina,, S.S. 1988. Èvolucija sredstv vyrayhenija modal'nosti v russkom Jazyke. Leningrad

Izdatel'stvoo Leningradskogo Universiteta. Velichko,, A.V. 1996. Sintakticheskajajra^eologija. Moskva: Filologicheskij Fakul'tet MGU. Verhagen,, A. 1986. Linguistic theory and the Junction of word order in Dutch. Doctoral

dissertation,, Vrij e Universiteit Amsterdam. Veyrenc,, J. 1979. Lis propositions infinitives en russe. Paris: Bibliothèque Russe. Veyrenc,, J. 1980. Études sur le verb russe. Paris: Institut d' Etudes Slaves. Veyrenc,, J. 1983. Le verbe 'être' en russe moderne. In: Ille Colloque de Linguistique Russe,

211—222.. Aix-en-Provence: Institut d'Etudes Slaves. Vinogradov,, V.V. 1947. Russkffjaqyk. Moskva: Uchpedgiz. Vinogradov,, V.V. 1952. (ed.) Grammatika russkogo ja^yka, Vol. I. Moskva: Izdatel' stvo

Akademiii Nauk SSSR. Vinogradov,, V.V. & Shvedova, IJu. 1964a. Ocherki po istoricheskoj grammatike Russkogo

UteraturnogpUteraturnogp jaqyka XTX veka: Ivgnenenija v sisteme prostogo i oslo^bnennogp predlot^henija. Moskva:: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.

Vinogradov,, V.V. & Shvedova, IJu. 1964b. Ocherkipo istoricheskojgrammatike Russkogo Utera-turnogpturnogp ja%yka XIX veka: I^neneni/a v stroe slo^hncpodchinennogo predki^hentja. Moskva: Izdatel'stvoo Nauka.

Vinogradov,, V.V. & Shvedova, IJu. 1964c. Ocherkipo istoricheskoj grummatike Russkojp liter-aturnogpjaqykaaturnogpjaqyka XIX veka: Iqnenenija v sisteme slovosochetany. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.

Vygotsky,, L. 1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MI T Press. Wade,, T. 1992. A comprehensive Russian grammar. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: BlackwelL Wetzer,, H. 1995. Nouniness and verbiness. Doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen University.

513 3


Wierzbicka,, A. 1966. Slavjanskij dativus cum infinitivus. In: International Journal of Slavic LinguisticsLinguistics and Poetics 10, 82-102.

Wierzbicka,, A. 1978. Syntax vs. semantics. In: Theoretical Linguistics 5,115-133. Wierzbicka,, A. 1986. The meaning of a case: A study of the Polish dative. In: Brecht, R.D.

&& Levine, J.S. (eds) Case in Slavic, 386-426. Columbus, OH: Slavica. Wierzbicka,, A. 1987. The semantics of modality. In: Folia Linguistica 21(1), 25-43. Wierzbicka,, A. 1996. Semantics. Primes and universal. Oxford/New York: Oxford University

Press. . Wittgenstein,, L. 1984. Traktatus logico-philosophicus. Werkausgabe Band 1. Tagebiicher 1914—

1916.1916. Philosophische Untersucbungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Xalizeva,, V.S. 1969. Semanticheskij analiz sojuzov predshestvovanija. In: RusskijJa%yk %a

Rube^bomRube^bom 2,77-82. Xrakovskij,, V.S. 1988. Imperativnye formy NSV i SV v russkom jazyke i ix upotreblenie.

In:: Russian Linguistics 12(3), 269-292. Xrakovskij,, V.S. & Volodin, A.P. 1986. Semantika i tipologija imperative Leningrad:

Izdatel'stvoo Nauka. Yokoyama,, O.T. 1986. Discourse and word order. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Zaefferer,, D. 1991. Semantic universals and universal semantics. Berlin/New York: Foris. Zaichkova,, I. 1972. Datel'njf bespredlo%hnyj v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jasyke. Praha:

Universitaa Karlova. Zaitseva,, V. 1990. Conditions for the presence of the dative NP in Russian impersonal

constructions.. In: Harvard Studies of Linguistics 1, 215—229. Zolotova,, G.A. 1982. Kommunikativnye aspekty russkogo sintaksisa. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo

Nauka. .

514 4


Textt sources

Thee Russian examples (extracts) in this dissertation are from (i) the corpus of A. Barentsen,, Department of Slavic linguistics, University of Amsterdam, (ii) Internet, (iii ) nativee speakers of Russian, and (iv) the following literary texts:

Amal'rik,, A. 1970 P'esy. Amsterdam: Fond imeni Gercena. Babel',, I. 1989. Kxtnarmija. Murmansk: Murmanskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel'stvo. Chexov,, A.P. 1988. Sredi mityx moskvichej. Moskva: Pravda. Erofeev,, V. 1993. l^brannye rasskavy, povesti. Mosvka, etc.: Tret'ja Volna. Gogol',, N.V. 1976. Sobranie sochinenij. Moskva: Xudozhestvennaja Literatura. Leskov,, N.S. 1979. I^brannyc sochinenija. Moskva: Xudozhestvennaja Literatura. Majakovskij,, V.V. 1987. Sochinenija v dvux tomax. Vol. 1. Moskva: Pravda. Paustovskij,, K. 1985. Nachaio neveaomogo veka. Vremja boVshix oi^hiaanij. Kiev: Izdatel'stvo

Xudozhestvennojj Literatury Dnipro. Pil'njak,, B. 1990. Chelovecheskij veter. veter. Romany. Povesti. Rasska^y. Chubinashvili: Ganadeba. TheThe Penguin book of Russian verse. 1962. Obolensky, D. (ed.). Middlesex: Penguin Books. Xarms,, D. 1991. Polet v nebesa. Leningrad: Sovetskij Pisatel'. Zoshchenko,, M. 1935 Is^bmnnye rasskaqy. Leningrad: Xudozhestvennaja Literatura.

515 5

uva-dare (digital academic repository) polysemy or ... · pdf fileinin het moderne russisch....

Documents