utilizing nasa earth observations to model present ... · emma hatcher (project lead) sarah carroll...

1
Results Many thanks to our Center Lead Brian Woodward, and our science advisors Dr. Paul Evangelista and Dr. Amanda West Special thanks to: Dr. Catherine Jarnevich (USGS Fort Collins Science Center) Aaron Martin (USFWS, Alaska Region) . Abstract Objectives Methodology Study Area Earth Observations Acknowledgements Project Partners Team Members Alaska Climate Utilizing NASA Earth Observations to Model Present Distributions of Invasive Species in Alaskan Wetlands Seasonal climate variables better explained species occurrences in artic regions like Alaska than annually averaged climate variables. Annually averaged climate variables generally underpredicted suitable habitat in Alaska, but were more informative in temperate regions at lower latitudes. Local input can be valuable in assessing the validly of model outputs, and can serve to inform the inclusion of the most ecologically relevant predictor variables for a given region in future, refined models. Conclusions USGS at Colorado State University – Summer 2017 Provide the distribution of suitable niches on a continental scale for the invasive species reed canarygrass, and purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) utilizing an ensemble modeling approach Model the current potential distribution of reed canarygrass ( Phalaris arundinacea L.) in Alaska to provide a region-specific model that can be compared to the continental model that includes Canada, Alaska, and the continental United States Create reference maps to support invasive species management in Alaska Produce a tutorial for natural resource managers at the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reproduce the methods employed in this study MODIS Terra MODIS Aqua SRTM V2 Emma Hatcher (Project Lead) Audrey Martinez Tim Mayer Sarah Carroll Alaska Region: Aaron Martin Aquatic Division- Program Coordinator Data Acquisition and Processing Topographic data (SRTM) Vegetation indices and land cover (MODIS) Climate variables (ClimateNA) Species presence data Modeling Habitat suitability modeling with predictors and presence data: Boosted Regression Trees Random Forests MaxEnt Results and Evaluation Final model selections Ten-fold cross validation Analyze statistical metrics to evaluate model performance Results displaying the relative probability of suitable habitat where green is low relative probability of occurrence, and red and purple are high relative probability for reed canarygrass and purple loosestrife respectively. Alaska AK Canada CONUS The rapid expansion of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) into aquatic and wetland systems has reduced native plant abundance, decreased species diversity, and degraded wetlands habitats in North America. This trend is particularly concerning in Alaska, where wetlands are of major economic and ecological importance. The expansion of these invasive species into northern latitudes as a result of changing climate trends poses mitigation challenges to natural resource managers. This project developed habitat suitability models utilizing spectral data from Terra and Aqua MODIS in conjunction with topographic and climatic variables to map historic and current suitable habitat for purple loosestrife and reed canarygrass across Canada and the United States. The resulting habitat suitability maps will support decision making and the planning of management actions by partners at the Alaska Region US Fish and Wildlife Service in the “Early Detection, Rapid Response” program for invasive species management. Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) Random Forest (RF) Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) Reed Canarygrass: MaxEnt Reed Canarygrass MaxEnt Purple Loosestrife: MaxEnt Purple Loosestrife: MaxEnt AUC (Train / CV) = 0.939 / 0.921 % Correctly Classified (Train CV) = 87.3 / 86.4 AUC (train / CV) = 0.978/0.94 % correctly classified (train / CV) = 92.8/88.3 0.989 0.0 Relative Habitat Probability 0.924 0.0 Relative Habitat Probability miles 1000 500 250 500 miles 250 500 miles 520 1,040 miles Continental Continental Alaska Projections Alaska Reed Canarygrass 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.99 AUC (train / CV) = 0.92/0.911 % correctly classified (train / CV) = 85.3/84.2 AUC (train / CV) = 0.941/0.94 % correctly classified (train / CV) = 87.7/88.7 AUC (train / CV) = 0.935 / 0.925 % correctly classified (Train / CV) = 85.2 / 84.9

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jun-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Utilizing NASA Earth Observations to Model Present ... · Emma Hatcher (Project Lead) Sarah Carroll Audrey Martinez Tim Mayer Alaska Region: Aaron Martin ... purple loosestrife and

Results

Many thanks to our Center Lead Brian Woodward, and our science advisors Dr. Paul Evangelista and Dr. Amanda West

Special thanks to:

Dr. Catherine Jarnevich (USGS Fort Collins Science Center)

Aaron Martin (USFWS, Alaska Region)

.

Abstract Objectives

Methodology

Study Area Earth Observations

Acknowledgements

Project Partners

Team Members

Ala

ska

Clim

ate

Utilizing NASA Earth Observations to Model Present Distributions of Invasive

Species in Alaskan Wetlands

Seasonal climate variables better explained species occurrences in artic regions like Alaska than annually averagedclimate variables.

Annually averaged climate variables generally underpredicted suitable habitat in Alaska, but were more informative intemperate regions at lower latitudes.

Local input can be valuable in assessing the validly of model outputs, and can serve to inform the inclusion of the mostecologically relevant predictor variables for a given region in future, refined models.

Conclusions

USGS at Colorado State University – Summer 2017

Provide the distribution of suitable niches on a continental scale for the invasive species reed canarygrass, and purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) utilizing an ensemble modeling approach

Model the current potential distribution of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceaL.) in Alaska to provide a region-specific model that can be compared to the continental model that includes Canada, Alaska, and the continental United States

Create reference maps to support invasive species management in Alaska

Produce a tutorial for natural resource managers at the US Fish and Wildlife Service to reproduce the methods employed in this study

MODIS Terra

MODIS Aqua

SRTM V2

Emma Hatcher

(Project Lead)

Audrey Martinez Tim MayerSarah Carroll

Alaska Region: Aaron Martin

Aquatic Division-Program Coordinator

Data Acquisition and Processing

Topographic data (SRTM)

Vegetation indices and land cover

(MODIS)

Climate variables (ClimateNA)

Species presence data

Modeling

Habitat suitability modeling with predictors and presence data:

Boosted Regression Trees

Random Forests

MaxEnt

Results and Evaluation

Final model selections

Ten-fold cross validation

Analyze statistical metrics to evaluate model performance

Results displaying the relative probability of suitable habitat where green is low relative probability of occurrence, and red and purple are high relative probability for reed

canarygrass and purple loosestrife respectively.

Alaska

AK

Canada

CONUS

The rapid expansion of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and reed canarygrass(Phalaris arundinacea L.) into aquatic and wetland systems has reduced native plantabundance, decreased species diversity, and degraded wetlands habitats in NorthAmerica. This trend is particularly concerning in Alaska, where wetlands are ofmajor economic and ecological importance. The expansion of these invasive speciesinto northern latitudes as a result of changing climate trends poses mitigationchallenges to natural resource managers. This project developed habitat suitabilitymodels utilizing spectral data from Terra and Aqua MODIS in conjunction withtopographic and climatic variables to map historic and current suitable habitat forpurple loosestrife and reed canarygrass across Canada and the United States. Theresulting habitat suitability maps will support decision making and the planning ofmanagement actions by partners at the Alaska Region US Fish and Wildlife Servicein the “Early Detection, Rapid Response” program for invasive speciesmanagement.

Boosted Regression Trees (BRT)

Random Forest (RF)

Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt)Reed Canarygrass: MaxEntReed Canarygrass MaxEnt

Purple Loosestrife: MaxEnt

Purple Loosestrife: MaxEnt

AUC (Train / CV) =

0.939 / 0.921

% Correctly Classified

(Train CV) = 87.3 / 86.4

AUC (train / CV) =

0.978/0.94

% correctly classified

(train / CV) = 92.8/88.3

0.989

0.0

Relative Habitat

Probability

0.924

0.0

Relative Habitat

Probability

miles1000500

250 500miles

250 500miles

520 1,040miles

Continental Continental Alaska Projections Alaska Reed Canarygrass

0.98

0.00

0.00

0.90

0.00

0.99

AUC (train / CV) =

0.92/0.911

% correctly classified

(train / CV) = 85.3/84.2

AUC (train / CV) =

0.941/0.94

% correctly classified

(train / CV) = 87.7/88.7

AUC (train / CV) =

0.935 / 0.925 % correctly

classified (Train / CV) =

85.2 / 84.9