utilizing eras to improve diet advancement post op
DESCRIPTION
Presentation highlighting how dietitians can make use of ERAS principles to get patients fed sooner.TRANSCRIPT
Utilising ERAS to improve meal advancement post
operatively.
Nathan Billing-Surgical Dietitian
Acknowledgement
Some slides taken from others presentations found online. Emma Osland Carli Schwartz
Other slides from AERAS study group slides Mattias Soop
Overview
Overview of Enhanced recovery programs Increasing intake after surgery Key Nutritional components of ERAS
Early Oral Feeding – Identifying issues Traditional vs Early post operative diet
advancement Clear Oral fluids versus Free Oral Fluids
Providing guidance to surgical team Rationalisation of diets available ? Recommended for diet advancement
Enhanced Recovery Program Pioneered by Henrik Kehlet group in
Denmark Identified factors which delay postoperative
recovery Pain
Gut dysfunction
Immobilization
Combined a series of interventions to reduce perioperative stress and organ dysfunction1
1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:606–617.
Recovery After SurgeryWhat are we trying to achieve?
Reduce the surgical stress response and support basic body functions by 1, 2
– Use of optimised analgesia – Early mobilisation– Early return to normal diet
These interventions have been shown to improve postoperative outcomes 3,4
1. Fearon, et al, Clinical Nutrition 2005; 24: 466–477. 2. Kehlet, Lancet 2008; 371: 791–793. 3. Khoo, et al, Annals of Surgery 2007; 245: 867–872. 4. Wind, et al. British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 800–809.
Multimodal steps of ERAS protocol
• Optimised health / medical condition
• Informed decision and patient education
• Pre operative health & risk assessment
• Optimised hydration & nutrition
• Reduced starvation
• Patient information and expectation managed
• Discharge planning
• No / Reduced bowel prep (bowel surgery)
• Minimally invasive surgery
• Use of transverse incisions
• No nasogastric tubes (bowel surgery)
• Use of Local anaesthetic with sedation
• Epidural management (inc thoracic)
• Optimised fluid management
• Planned mobilisation
• Rapid hydration & nourishment
• Appropriate IV therapy
• No wound drains
• No NG ( bowel surgery)
• Catheters removed early
• Regular oral analgesia – paracetamol and NSAIDS
• Avoidance of opiate-based analgesia where possible or administered topically
• Estimated discharge date as planned
• Full information and ongoing support
• Allied Health professional follow up where required
• Personal follow up from clinical team (home calls)
Pre Operative
Intra Operative
Post Operative
Discharge
Increasing oral intake after surgery
Day 0 patients receive Sandwich for day of surgery 2 x supplements post operatively
Day 1 onwards patients receive progress to standard diet 3 x supplements post operatively
Use of nutritional supplements in malnourished patients post operatively
(600kcal/day)
Beattie A H et al. Gut 2000;46:813-818
©2000 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology
Fluid input: ERAS vs Conventional Care
Teeuwen, et al, J Gastrointestinal Surgery 2010; 14:pp88–95.
61 ERAS patients vs 122 historical matched controlsERAS total IV fluid intake ≠ > 2 l/24 h
Effect of mobilization on oral intake
00.20.40.60.81
Intervention Control
Mean Protein intake
Patients in intervention group encouraged to active mobilization from day 1
Control mobilized in traditional manner without specific aims
Main part of meals was eaten while sitting at a table and not in a bed
0
20
40
60
80
Intervention Control
Mean Energy Intake
Henriksen, et al, Nutrition 2002; 18(3): pp:263–267.
Kj /
kg /
day
g /
kg /
day
Importance of team approach
Agreement between anaesthesia and surgical teams
FTE requirement importance of ERAS nurse
Need surgeon buy in
ERAS alone is not enough
Influence of compliance with the separate care elements on length of stay on various components on length of hospital stay
Hazzard ratio above 1 indicates a better chance of early discharge whereas a value below 1 indicates a lower chance.
Maessen, et al, British Journal of Surgery 2007; 94: pp224-231.
Oral feeding
Nutrition 2002; 18:944-948
Factors that limit or promote post operative feeding
Feeding the patient: Postoperative Nutrient
Provision
Traditional Postoperative Diet AdvancementTraditional practice NBM prior to surgery NBM and gastric
decompression until bowel function resumed post surgery
Diet progression once gut working Clear fluids free fluids soft/light diet full diet
Rationale Initially adopted to
combat post operative vomiting and subsequent concerns Aspiration pneumonia Increase abdominal
pressure anastomotic rupture
Also thought to “protect the anastomosis” by allowing gut rest and avoiding food passing the surgical site
Clear Oral Fluids vs Free Oral Fluids
Aim: To provide a diet of liquid foods that require no chewing.
Includes more protein high in saturated fat and low in fibre, and may require vitamin and mineral supplementation.
Clear Oral Fluids Free Oral fluids
Aim: To replace or maintain the body’s water balance and leave minimum residue in the intestinal tract
Meets anaesthesia fasting guidelines
Inadequate in all nutrients
Early Postoperative Feeding
Early post-op feeding Clear fluids to 3-4hrs
pre-anaesthetic Fluids or diet from first
postoperative day irrespective of resumption of bowel function
No NGT post op Often in the context of
multimodal approach including earlier mobilisation, non-opioid
analgesia, key-hole surgery
Rationale Gut secretes and reabsorbs
~7L fluid/d irrespective of oral intake, so “protecting the anastomosis” is based on a false premise
Many patients already malnourished more postoperative complications
Nausea/vomiting is much less of a problem with new anaesthetic agents
Some evidence that early feeding reduces the body’s stress response to surgery/trauma
The research …
Increasing numbers of studies investigating this topic dating from 1978 Tube feeding early liquids early solids
Individual studies do not demonstrate major adverse outcomes with early feeding
Some suggestion of organisational benefits May decrease length of hospital stay and cost
of treatment
Reported adverse outcomes Nausea, vomiting, NG reinsertion (common)
Previously conducted meta-analyses
Nutritional issues• Inclusion of immune-modulating EN products• Inclusion of studies feeding both proximal and distal to
anastomoses• Nutrition provided at 24hrs post op may have included
clear fluids little nutritional valueGeneral issues
Appears to contain inconsistencies in inclusion criteria of studies included
Criteria for this meta-analysis Early feeding provision of diet (excluding COFS) and
enteral feeding given within 24 hours postoperatively. Traditional postoperative management = withholding
nutrition provision until bowel function had resumed, as evidenced by either passage of flatus or bowel motion
Early vs Traditional PostOp feeding
• Fifteen studies involving a total of 1240 patients were analysed in meta-analysis.
• To investigate impact of early feeding vs traditional postoperative feeding and
• Mortality • Anastamotic Leaks• Days to passing Flatus• Length of stay• Postoperative Complications
Results - Mortality
Osland et al, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011 35(4):p 481
Results – Anastamotic Leaks
Osland et al, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011 35(4):p 481
Results – Days to passing flatus
Osland et al, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011 35(4):p 482
Results – Length of Stay
Osland et al, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011 35(4):p 483
Results – Postoperative Complications (Nausea and Vomiting
excluded)Study pre 2000SagarRyanSchroederBinderowBeier-HolgersenCarrOrtizHartsellNessimStewartsubtotal
post 2000Han-GeurtsDelaneyLuchaZhouHan-Geurtssubtotal
POOLED
Early
3 of 152 of 7
4 of 160 of 328 of 300 of 14
17 of 931 of 293 of 27
10 of 4048 of 303
12 of 567 of 311 of 26
23 of 16122 of 46
65 of 320
113 of 623
Traditional
5 of 157 of 7
7 of 160 of 32
19 of 304 of 14
18 of 951 of 294 of 27
12 of 4077 of 305
13 of 4910 of 33
1 of 2570 of 155
20 of 50114 of 312
191 of 617
OR
0.530.030.46
10.220.080.96
10.750.780.55
0.760.690.960.211.370.62
0.55
L
0.080
0.070.020.05
00.240.070.110.170.34
0.180.140.070.060.330.26
0.35
U
3.780.942.91
61.411.082.063.77
13.425.013.56
0.9
3.273.38
12.990.745.611.51
0.87
0.1 2.0 4.0 6.0
favour Early favour Traditional
Osland et al, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011 35(4):p 479
Conclusions of Meta-analyisis No merit in withholding nutrition
provided proximal to the anastomosis until bowel function is resumed.
Statistically significant reductions in total complications in the postoperative course with early feeding.
No negative effect of early feeding was demonstrated with regard to in hospital mortality, anastomotic dehiscence, LOS, and time to recovery of bowel function
Recommending Diet Advancement
Advance diet to full liquids followed by solid foods, depending on patient’s tolerance. Consider the patient’s disease state and any
complications that may have come about since surgery.
Liaise closely with surgical teams Provide guidance of meal choices available in your
kitchen. Define meal advancement. Standardize practices.
Liasing with Surgical teams
What does “E & D as tolerated” mean? Review of diet codes available for use
i.e. Light diet vs Low Residue Diet vs Post Op Diet When to use Modified consistency diets
e.g. Upper GI surgery vs Lower GI surgeryUpper GI surgery could have impact on peristalsis
so may require liquid or pureed meals
?Sham feeding (i.e. Chewing gum)
Type of Surgery / Underlying Condition
Recommended diet post op
Rationale
Recurrent Small bowel obstruction
Low residue diet A diet low in fibre to minimise chance of further obstructions occurring
Upper GI surgery:Nissens FundoplicationOesophagectomyIvor Lewis Gastrectomy
Liquid Diet or
Pureed Dietor
Low residue diet
As this surgery would have an impact on the mechanical ability to swallow feed and lead to a degree of dysphagia. A liquid or pureed diet is recommended initially to help minimise difficulties in swallowing
Small bowel resections Liquid Diet or
Low residue dietor
Standard diet
As this surgery may result in anastamotic joins in small intestine low residue foods are recommended to minimise pressure on these joins initially.
Colorectal surgery Standard diet or
High Energy protein diet
As this surgery involves the lower GI tract, most food is well digested by the time it reaches the colon and regardless of the type of food should be pretty well digested
Cholecystectomy Standard diet
As gut motility or function has not been altered by surgery no special requirements or surgery
Non Gut surgery
Standard diet As gut motility or function has not been altered by surgery no special requirements or surgery
Alternative to E+D as tolerated?
Tailor made protocols
Specific surgeries / conditions that will have own specialist diet progression pathway and dietetic input
Bariatric SurgeryGastric Bypass (Roux en Y)Gastric SleeveDuodenal Switch
Water only Optifast Fluid diet Pureed diet
Patients need to adjust to smaller stomach volume and advance their diet slowly after surgery. There is close working with surgeons and set plans for these patients in place.
Chylous ascites and Chyle leaks
Specialist diet with reduced fat and
high MCT content
Dietary chylomicrons are absorbed in the small intestines and gradually pass along larger omental lymphatics. Reducing the intake of fat has been shown to be beneficial at minimising
Pancreatic surgery or other fistulas
Potential enteral NJ feeding and or
IVN/TPN
Stimulation of pancreatic or other GI secretions may be an issue and may need to be minimised. Dietitian input is recommended.
As per Surgeon
Questions References: Anderson et al. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later
commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006 (4): CD002080.
Franklin, G.A., McClave, S.A., Hurt, R.T., Lowen, C.C., Stout, A.E, et al., 2011. Physician- Delivered Malnutrition: Why do patients receive nothing by mouth or a clear liquid diet in a university hospital setting? Journal of Parental and Enteral Nutrition. 35(3):pp337-342.
Hancock, S., Cresci, G., Martindale, R., 2002. The clear Liquid Diet: When is it appropriate? Current Gastroenterology reports. 4: pp324-331.
Jeffery, K.M., Harkins, B., Cresci, G.A., Martindale, R.G., 1996. The clear liquid diet is no longer a necessity in the routine postoperative management of surgical patients. The American Surgeon 62(3):167-70.
Kawamura, Y.J., Kuwahara Y., Mizokami K., et al., 2010. Patient’s appetite is a good indicator for postoperative feeding: a proposal for individualized postoperative feeding after surgery for colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis.;25:pp239-243.
Lewis et al. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ, 2001, 323 (7316) 773-776
Lewis et al. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg, July 16 2008
Story, S.K., Chamberlain, R.S,. 2009 A Comprehensive Review of Evidence-Based Strategies to Prevent and Treat Postoperative Ileus. Digestive Surgery 2009; 26:265–275.
Warren, J., Bhalla, V., Cresci, G., 2011. Postoperative Diet Advancement: Surgical Dogma vs Evidence based Medicine. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 26(2): pp115-125.