utilization of predictive combustion and emission models ... · project: analysis of different...
TRANSCRIPT
Utilization of Predictive
Combustion and Emission Models
for Optimization of Engine Performance
Johannes Konrad, MSc.
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 2
Outline
Motivation
Description of the Predictive Modelling Approach
1-dim Engine Model
Dual Fuel Combustion Model
NO- and Knock-Models
Adjustment of Models According to Test Bench Data
Optimization of Engine Performance due to Cylinder Cut-Out
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-Out
Optimization Workflow
Optimized Engine Performance
Conclusions
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 3
Focus of thermodynamic engine development
for maritime application is on:
v
v
Efficient and economic development depends on the application and
conjunction of test bench measurements and 0-dim / 1-dim / 3-dim models
Predictive 1-dim engine models:
• Provide detailed insight into fluid mechanic and thermodynamics
• Allow analyzing various development approaches due to increased calc. speed
• Display dependencies, consequently, can be utilized to solve optimization tasks
Motivation
1-dim Numerical ModelsPhoto: MAN Diesel & Turbo
• Responds
• Emissions
• Power
• Efficiency
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 4
State of the art
Medium speed dual fuel engines do not have
throttling devices to reduce air flow losses
Very lean air fuel mixture, incomplete
combustion, and increased methane emissions in low load
Project:
Analysis of different electronic cylinder cut-out sequences and optimization
of engine performance
Therefore, application of 1-dim engine model that is able to predict dual fuel
combustion, NO emissions and knock onset
Motivation
Electronic Cylinder Cut-OutPhoto: MAN Diesel & Turbo
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 5
Outline
Motivation
Description of the Predictive Modelling Approach
1-dim Engine Model
Dual Fuel Combustion Model
NO- and Knock-Models
Adjustment of Models According to Test Bench Data
Optimization of Engine Performance due to Cylinder Cut-Out
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-Out
Optimization Workflow
Optimized Engine Performance
Conclusions
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 6
Description of the Modelling ApproachDevelopment 1-dim Engine Model
Electronic cylinder cut-out applied
by deactivation of gas injection
Relative air/fuel ratio of fired
cylinders is applied for control
GT-Power model of a 4-stroke dual
fuel engine with 7 cylinders in-line
Gas injection upstream of the
cylinders and direct pilot injection
Oxygen partial pressure measured
upstream of the turbine; applied to
control the gas mass flow
Prescribed torque is applied
Charge air pressure and rotational
speed are controlled by bypass at
constant relative air/fuel ratio
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 7
Description of the Modelling ApproachDual Fuel Combustion and Emissions
Increased fraction of diesel pilot fuel
in low load to achieve stable ignition
and combustion
Increased fraction of diesel
combustion leads to increased peak
temperatures and NO-emissions
Cylinder cut-out:
• Remaining fired cylinders are charged
with increased load
• Reduced fraction of diesel combustion
• Red. peak temp. and NO-emissions
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 8
Description of the Modelling ApproachDual Fuel Combustion Model
Developed during the preceding project Hercules-C at the LEC, Graz
and updated during Hercules-2 at LEC and IFA, TU-Wien
Diesel ignition delay according to Arrhenius approach
Diesel spray represented by homogeneous
package model (Hiroyasu and Stiesch)
Initial spray penetration length:
• Depends on initial package velocity, time and position
• Ignites area of the homogeneous natural gas air mixture
• Defines initial conditions of premix combustion and flame front
Source: Stiesch
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 9
Description of the Modelling ApproachDual Fuel Combustion Model
Premixed combustion of homogeneous background mixture according to
entrainment model (Tabaczynski)
Flame front (Salbrechter) expansion velocimetry depends on:
• Density difference of the burned
and unburned zone
• Turbulent flame speed, TKE, Da (Noske)
Laminar flame speed of homogenous background mixture
according to reaction kinetic calculations
Correction factors are applied to consider the influence of e.g. the methane
number and residual gas fraction (Krenn, Oppl)
Source: Salbrechter
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 10
Description of the Modelling ApproachNO and Knock Models
NO emission are simulated according to the approach of Pattas and Häfner:
• Temperature and concentration originate from Dual-Fuel combustion model
• NO formation based on elementary and atomic nitrogen (Zeldovich, Muzio)
• Hydroxyl-mechanism (Heywood) and Dinitrogen-mechanisms (Lavoie)
Knock model is based on an Arrhenius approach:
• Depends on density of the unburned zone
• Determines the concentration of a knock-relevant-species
• If the species concentration exceeds a definable threshold, the combustion is
classified knocking
Adjustment of dual fuel combustion-, knock and NO-models to test bench
measurements and raw emissions by a numerical optimization workflow
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 11
Description of the Modelling ApproachResults of Optimization Process
Reproduction with good accuracy of
combustion rates, NO emissions and
knock onset
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 12
Description of the Modelling ApproachResults of Optimization Process
Predictive engine model that represents the relevant
engine operation map with a good precision
Good correlation of high and low
pressure indication
Good fit of turbocharger efficiency
Good fit of air / fuel mass flow,
IMEP, and BMEP
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 13
Outline
Motivation
Description of the Predictive Modelling Approach
1-dim Engine Model
Dual Fuel Combustion Model
NO- and Knock-Models
Adjustment of Models According to Test Bench Data
Optimization of Engine Performance due to Cylinder Cut-Out
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-Out
Optimization Workflow
Optimized Engine Performance
Conclusions
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 14
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-OutLoad Depending Results on Efficiency, Methane-Slip, and NO-Emissions
Static cut-out of 1 to 3 cylinder
leads to:
• Increased efficiency
• Increased fraction of burned fuel
• Reduced NO emission
Effects rise with the number of
cut-out cylinders
Number of cut-out cylinders
depends on:
• Applied load
• Relative air/fuel ratio (rAFR)
• Turbocharger and bypass
Knocking not relevant
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 15
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-OutResults on Efficiency
Increase of efficiency mostly due to raised fraction
of burned fuel
Effects rise with the number of cut-out cylinders
Applied load is distributed to the remaining fired
cylinders:
• Increased air mass flow to
cylinders and elevated charge air
pressure
• Increased turbocharger efficiency
• Reduced PMEP due to increased
scavenging gradient
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 16
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-OutResults on NO Emissions
At low load, amount of diesel
pilot is higher to ensure stable
combustion
High temperatures of diesel
combustion lead to increased
NO emissions (Zeldovich)
Combustion is shifted from partial diesel combustion
towards premixed combustion
As a result: reduced peak temp. and NO emissions
Keep NO emissions constant and increase
efficiency by richer relative air fuel ratio
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 17
Optimization of Engine PerformanceOptimization Process
GT-Power Model coupled to
developed Optimus workflow
Engine operation with defined
load
Optimization of efficiency by
var. of:
• Relative air/fuel ratio
• Number of cut-out cylinders
Optimization under
consideration of:
• NO emission constraint
• Knock onset
Efficiency increases with richer
combustion and raised number of
cut-out cylinders
Number of cut-out cylinders dep. on
load and NO emission benchmarks
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 18
Optimization of Engine PerformanceLoad Depending Optimization
Cut-out of 1 to 3 cylinders and var.
of rAFR leads to incr. efficiency
NO emissions meet the
benchmarks
Efficiency improvement:
• Increases in low load operation
• Mostly depends on elevated
fraction of burned fuel
Low load operation without cyl.
cut-out leads to lean rAFR, thus
fraction of burned fuel and
efficiency are reduced
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 19
Optimization of Engine PerformanceResults
Optimization of low load operation:
• Increased number of cut-out
cylinders
• More distinct shift from diesel to
premix combustion
• Stronger shift of rAFR to
stoichiometric
• Elevated fraction of burned fuel
Generally increased turbocharger
efficiency, thus PMEP is reduced
NO emissions benchmarks are
met
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 20
Outline
Motivation
Description of the Predictive Modelling Approach
1-dim Engine Model
Dual Fuel Combustion Model
NO- and Knock-Models
Adjustment of Models According to Test Bench Data
Optimization of Engine Performance due to Cylinder Cut-Out
Engine Operation with Cylinder Cut-Out
Optimization Workflow
Optimized Engine Performance
Conclusions
2nd Workshop: Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
April 26 2018 | Rostock | Johannes Konrad | Slide 21
Conclusions
1-dim DF-combustion, NO- and Knock-models
are applied; an optimization workflow is set up
Due to the static cylinder cut-out, the simulation
model predicts an increased brake efficiency
mostly based on:
• Increased fraction of burned fuel
• Reduced pumping work
The simulation model predicts reduced NO emissions
because of the shift from diesel to premixed combustion
Engine efficiency increases due to optimized rAFR and cut-out cylinders
Skip firing will be applied in the near future to prevent cylinder cool down
Photo: MAN Diesel & Turbo
Herzlichen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!
Johannes Konrad
Institute for Powertrains and Automotive Technology
Vienna University of Technology
Getreidemarkt 9
1060 Vienna, Austria
Thank you for your attention!
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research
and innovation programme under grant agreement No 634135