utilitarianism. main claim: utilitarianism main claim: something is right to the degree that it...

34
Utilitarianis

Upload: isabella-jefferson

Post on 17-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Utilitarianism

Page 2: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:

Page 3: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Page 4: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Page 5: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Page 6: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Impartial

Page 7: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Impartial

Long-term consequences

Page 8: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Impartial

Long-term consequences

Duty to be informed

Page 9: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Impartial

Long-term consequences

Duty to be informed

Indifference to distribution

Page 10: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

UtilitarianismMain claim:Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree that it decreases overall well-being.

Impartial

Long-term consequences

Duty to be informed

Indifference to distribution

Results vs. intent

Page 11: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Page 12: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Page 13: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

Page 14: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Page 15: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Page 16: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Supererogatory acts

Page 17: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Supererogatory acts

Personal relationships

Page 18: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Supererogatory acts

Personal relationships

Against consequentialism

Page 19: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Supererogatory acts

Personal relationships

Against consequentialism

Complexity

Page 20: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Supererogatory acts

Personal relationships

Against consequentialism

Complexity

Backward-looking obligations

Page 21: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Arguments against:

Against hedonism

Happiness not the end

"A doctrine worthy only of swine"

Against impartiality

Supererogatory acts

Personal relationships

Against consequentialism

Complexity

Backward-looking obligations

Justice

Page 22: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Cecilia is a surgeon who specializes in organ transplants. She is distraught about four prominent citizens at the top of the waiting list for organ donations, all of whom perform valuable services to society, all of whom have large families who depend on them, and all of whom will soon die unless organ donors are found.

Page 23: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Cecilia is a surgeon who specializes in organ transplants. She is distraught about four prominent citizens at the top of the waiting list for organ donations, all of whom perform valuable services to society, all of whom have large families who depend on them, and all of whom will soon die unless organ donors are found. Cecilia also volunteers in a community clinic once a month. One day while she is alone there, Jeb walks in. Jeb is new in town, has no friends or family, no job, no place to live, and is a high-school dropout. He asks to be given a routine physical examination. As Cecilia analyzes his blood sample, she realizes that Jeb is an excellent tissue match for the four people who need organs (they all need different organs, so Jeb by himself has the organs that could save them).

Page 24: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Cecilia is a surgeon who specializes in organ transplants. She is distraught about four prominent citizens at the top of the waiting list for organ donations, all of whom perform valuable services to society, all of whom have large families who depend on them, and all of whom will soon die unless organ donors are found. Cecilia also volunteers in a community clinic once a month. One day while she is alone there, Jeb walks in. Jeb is new in town, has no friends or family, no job, no place to live, and is a high-school dropout. He asks to be given a routine physical examination. As Cecilia analyzes his blood sample, she realizes that Jeb is an excellent tissue match for the four people who need organs (they all need different organs, so Jeb by himself has the organs that could save them).

Assume that Cecilia has exactly two choices of action: Allow Jeb to leave the clinic, and let the four people die;

Page 25: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Cecilia is a surgeon who specializes in organ transplants. She is distraught about four prominent citizens at the top of the waiting list for organ donations, all of whom perform valuable services to society, all of whom have large families who depend on them, and all of whom will soon die unless organ donors are found. Cecilia also volunteers in a community clinic once a month. One day while she is alone there, Jeb walks in. Jeb is new in town, has no friends or family, no job, no place to live, and is a high-school dropout. He asks to be given a routine physical examination. As Cecilia analyzes his blood sample, she realizes that Jeb is an excellent tissue match for the four people who need organs (they all need different organs, so Jeb by himself has the organs that could save them).

Assume that Cecilia has exactly two choices of action: Allow Jeb to leave the clinic, and let the four people die; Kill Jeb, harvest his organs, and save the four people (assume she can do this without getting caught).

Page 26: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Cecilia is a surgeon who specializes in organ transplants. She is distraught about four prominent citizens at the top of the waiting list for organ donations, all of whom perform valuable services to society, all of whom have large families who depend on them, and all of whom will soon die unless organ donors are found. Cecilia also volunteers in a community clinic once a month. One day while she is alone there, Jeb walks in. Jeb is new in town, has no friends or family, no job, no place to live, and is a high-school dropout. He asks to be given a routine physical examination. As Cecilia analyzes his blood sample, she realizes that Jeb is an excellent tissue match for the four people who need organs (they all need different organs, so Jeb by himself has the organs that could save them).

Assume that Cecilia has exactly two choices of action: Allow Jeb to leave the clinic, and let the four people die; Kill Jeb, harvest his organs, and save the four people (assume she can do this without getting caught).

Which action would produce the best consequences if Cecilia were to perform it?

Page 27: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Defenses:

Page 28: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Defenses:

Examples calculate consequences wrongly

Page 29: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Defenses:

Examples calculate consequences wrongly

Rejection of moral intuitions as standard

Page 30: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Defenses:

Examples calculate consequences wrongly

Rejection of moral intuitions as standard

Overgeneralizing

Page 31: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Defenses:

Examples calculate consequences wrongly

Rejection of moral intuitions as standard

Overgeneralizing

Rule utilitarianism

Page 32: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Cecilia is a surgeon who specializes in organ transplants. She is distraught about four prominent citizens at the top of the waiting list for organ donations, all of whom perform valuable services to society, all of whom have large families who depend on them, and all of whom will soon die unless organ donors are found. Cecilia also volunteers in a community clinic once a month. One day while she is alone there, Jeb walks in. Jeb is new in town, has no friends or family, no job, no place to live, and is a high-school dropout. He asks to be given a routine physical examination. As Cecilia analyzes his blood sample, she realizes that Jeb is an excellent tissue match for the four people who need organs (they all need different organs, so Jeb by himself has the organs that could save them).

Assume that Cecilia has exactly two choices of action: Allow Jeb to leave the clinic, and let the four people die; Kill Jeb, harvest his organs, and save the four people (assume she can do this without getting caught).

Which action would produce the best consequences if one million doctors in roughly the same situation were to perform it?

Page 33: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Against consequentialism

Complexity

Backward-looking obligations

Justice

Page 34: Utilitarianism. Main claim: Utilitarianism Main claim: Something is right to the degree that it increases overall well-being, and wrong to the degree

Defenses:

Examples calculate consequences wrongly

Rejection of moral intuitions as standard

Overgeneralizing

Rule utilitarianism

Problem of exceptions to rule