utilising citrate quechers extraction without dispersive spe … 3307... · 2019. 12. 19. ·...

1
SASA (Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture) is one of the United Kingdom’s (UK) official laboratories and we participate, on behalf of the Scottish Government, in the annual UK and EU statutory surveillance programmes that monitor various UK and imported food & drink for residues of pesticides, their metabolites and other degradation products. It is mandatory for official laboratories to analyse all pesticides listed in the EU multiannual control programme and to also participate in UK and EU proficiency testing schemes. The European Commission released an updated revision in December 2015 of the working document (SANCO/12745/2013 rev. 6 (3)) which included pesticides to be considered for inclusion in future national control programmes. We are systematically replacing our ethyl acetate (crude extract) LC/MSMS (QqQ) method with the citrate QuEChERS extraction without dispersive SPE clean-up and LC/MSMS (QTRAP). The new method which incorporates polarity switching is being used routinely and successfully to extend our target lists and specifically to include amenable pesticides (Tables 1 & 2) highlighted in the EC working document. In this poster we demonstrate the success of the method transfer with data generated from 39 of the pesticides highlighted in the working document. Presented data includes green bean validation data (Table 3), quantitative results from retail samples of speciality green beans (Table 4) which were analysed as part of the annual UK surveillance programme and EU Proficiency test data [EUPT-FV18 - Spinach] (Table 5). Utilising Citrate QuEChERS extraction without dispersive SPE clean-up and LCMSMS (QTRAP) multi-residue method to include pesticides from the European Commission working document Introduction Table 1. Positive MRM acquisition parameters. Pesticide Retention time Q1 Q3 Declustering Potential (DP) Collision Energy (CE) Collision Exit Potential (CXP) Ametoctradin 1 7.27 276.1 176.1 141 51 10 Ametoctradin 2 7.27 276.1 149 141 49 8 Amitraz 1 9.96 294 163 31 21 10 Amitraz 2 9.96 294 122 31 41 14 Clomazone 1 4.17 240 125 46 27 14 Clomazone 2 4.17 240 89 46 63 10 Cyazofamid 1 5.37 324.9 107.8 26 21 16 Cyazofamid 2 5.37 324.9 261 26 13 14 Cyhalofop-butyl 1 7.28 375 256 26 21 14 Cyhalofop-butyl 2 7.28 375 358 26 11 12 Emamectin benzoate 1 10.38 886.4 158.1 20 41 10 Emamectin benzoate 2 10.38 886.4 82 20 117 12 Etoxazole 1 9.22 360 141 106 39 10 Etoxazole 2 9.22 360 113 106 81 14 Fenpyrazamine 1 4.95 332 230 36 25 14 Fenpyrazamine 2 4.95 332 216 36 37 12 Flufenacet 1 5.3 363.9 194 31 15 10 Flufenacet 2 5.3 363.9 152 31 27 10 Fluopicollide 1 4.76 384.8 174.9 37 31 10 Fluopicollide 2 4.76 384.8 172.9 37 29 12 Fluxapyroxad 1 4.67 381.9 362 71 19 10 Fluxapyroxad 2 4.67 381.9 342 71 29 12 Isopyrazam 1 7.1 360 244 106 31 14 Isopyrazam 2 7.1 360 340.1 106 21 10 Isoxaflutole 1 3.64 360.1 251 111 23 14 Isoxaflutole 2 3.64 360.1 220 111 53 12 Metconazole 1 6.51 320 69.9 16 63 8 Metconazole 2 6.51 320 125 16 53 20 Molinate 1 5.06 188.07 126 38 19 6 Molinate 2 5.06 188.07 83 38 23 12 Oxadiargyl 1 6.58 340.9 222.9 131 21 12 Oxadiargyl 2 6.58 340.9 151 131 35 18 Oxasulfuron 1 2.2 407 150.1 61 23 8 Oxasulfuron 2 2.2 407 106.9 61 67 12 Penflufen 1 5.96 318 234.1 76 23 12 Penflufen 2 5.96 318 141 76 41 8 Penthiopyrad 1 6.04 360 276 76 19 14 Penthiopyrad 2 6.04 360 177 76 45 10 Picolinafen 1 8.28 377 238 71 35 14 Picolinafen 2 8.28 377 359 71 27 10 Prochloraz 1 6.68 375.9 307.9 23 17 8 Prochloraz 2 6.68 375.9 70 23 43 11 Propaquizafop 1 8.08 444 100 26 23 12 Propaquizafop 2 8.08 444 299 26 31 8 Proquinazid 1 9.59 373 330.9 11 19 18 Proquinazid 2 9.59 373 288.8 11 33 16 Prosulfocarb 1 7.62 252 91 81 33 10 Prosulfocarb 2 7.62 252 128 81 17 6 Prothioconazole Desthio 1 5.53 311.9 69.9 16 55 8 Prothioconazole Desthio 2 5.53 311.9 124.9 16 41 14 Pyrethrins Cinerin I 1 9.32 316.9 149 36 13 8 Pyrethrins Cinerin I 2 9.32 316.9 107 36 27 12 Pyrethrins Cinerin II 1 7.29 360.9 149 51 13 8 Pyrethrins Cinerin II 2 7.29 360.9 107 51 27 12 Pyrethrins Jasmolin I 1 10.07 330.8 163 41 10 5 Pyrethrins Jasmolin I 2 10.07 330.8 121 41 10 5 Pyrethrins Jasmolin II 1 8.19 375 162.9 51 13 12 Pyrethrins Jasmolin II 2 8.19 375 120.9 51 25 22 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin I 1 9.42 328.8 161 41 12 10 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin I 2 9.42 328.8 133 41 22 5 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin II 1 7.45 373 161 46 13 8 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin II 2 7.45 373 142.9 46 25 4 Quinoclamine 1 2.99 208 104.9 86 33 12 Quinoclamine 2 2.99 208 89.1 86 51 14 Quizalofop-P-ethyl 1 7.75 373 299 101 25 16 Quizalofop-P-ethyl 2 7.75 373 255 101 47 14 Rotenone 1 5.67 395 213 117 31 12 Rotenone 2 5.67 395 192 117 33 12 Spirotetramat 1 5.17 374 216 61 45 12 Spirotetramat 2 5.17 374 330.1 61 21 18 Tri-allate 1 8.82 303.9 142.9 41 35 8 Tri-allate 2 8.82 303.9 85.9 41 21 12 Triticonazole 1 5.22 317.9 70 16 37 8 Triticonazole 2 5.22 317.9 124.8 16 47 22 Table 2. Negative MRM acquisition parameters. Pesticide Retention time Q1 Q3 Declustering Potential (DP) Collision Energy (CE) Collision Exit Potential (CXP) 2,4-DB neg 1 3.24 246.9 160.8 -5 -14 -9 2,4-DB neg 2 3.24 246.9 124.9 -5 -38 -9 Ioxynil 1 2.57 369.7 126.7 -75 -38 -15 Ioxynil 2 2.57 369.7 214.9 -75 -42 -9 MCPA neg 1 2.57 198.9 141 -15 -20 -9 MCPA neg 2 2.57 201 143 -15 -22 -8 MCPB neg 1 3.27 227 141 -20 -14 -9 MCPB neg 2 3.27 227 105 -20 -38 -13 Quizalofop neg 1 3.43 343 271 -20 -20 -9 Quizalofop neg 2 3.43 343 242.9 -20 -36 -13 Triclopyr 1 2.65 255.9 197.7 -10 -16 -9 Triclopyr 2 2.65 255.9 219.8 -10 -10 -13 Tritosulfuron neg 1 2.48 443.9 193 -15 -20 -11 Tritosulfuron neg 2 2.48 443.9 161 -15 -68 -11 1 denotes quantifier; 2 denotes qualifier Experimental Table 3. 2015-2016 green bean validation data. Mean Recovery %RSD Mean Recovery %RSD Pesticide 0.02 mg/kg 0.02 mg/kg 0.01 mg/kg 0.01 mg/kg 2,4-DB 97 8 92 5 Ametoctradin 106 1 99 4 Amitraz 85 6 89 7 Clomazone 101 2 97 2 Cyazofamid 101 3 98 3 Cyhalofop-butyl 102 2 100 3 Emamectin benzoate 97 2 95 3 Etoxazole 96 2 94 3 Fenpyrazamine 93 2 95 2 Flufenacet 101 2 81 8 Fluopicolide 100 5 73 11 Fluxapyroxad 101 2 80 8 Ioxynil 98 1 79 7 Isopyrazam 100 2 98 4 Isoxaflutole 103 2 101 5 MCPA 94 2 94 3 MCPB 97 2 97 3 Metconazole 95 5 76 5 Molinate 102 2 98 2 Oxadiargyl 100 1 99 2 Oxasulfuron 103 3 100 6 Penflufen 92 1 96 2 Penthiopyrad 99 1 98 4 Picolinafen 97 1 96 3 Prochloraz 97 2 79 7 Propaquizafop 96 1 79 6 Proquinazid 98 2 96 2 Prosulfocarb 101 2 99 2 Prothioconazole Desthio 95 2 75 7 Pyrethrins Cinerin I 117 4 117 3 Pyrethrins Cinerin II 114 9 112 16 Pyrethrins Jasmolin I 113 8 107 8 Pyrethrins Jasmolin II 116 7 111 14 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin I 97 5 101 8 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin II 98 5 101 10 Quinoclamine 98 3 99 5 Quizalofop 94 2 92 3 Quizalofop-P-ethyl 99 1 97 2 Rotenone 91 4 75 12 Spirotetramat 99 2 98 3 Tri-allate 101 2 97 3 Triclopyr 93 1 91 2 Triticonazole 1 99 4 75 7 Tritosulfuron 102 1 99 2 n = 6 Results Table 4. Results from 2015 green bean samples. Sample Description Country of Origin Residue Conc. (mg/kg) Maximum Residue Level (mg/kg) Papi Beans Bangladesh Emamectin Benzoate B1a 0.02 0.01 Uri beans Malaysia Emamectin Benzoate B1a 0.01 0.01 Hyacinth beans Bangladesh Emamectin Benzoate B1a 0.08 0.01 Table 5. Recent preliminary results form 2016 European Union Proficiency Test on spinach (EUPT-FV-18). Pesticide Reported Value Assigned Value Z-Score Cyazofamid 0.25 0.279 -0.4 Fenpyrazamine 0.38 0.357 0.3 Conclusion The method incorporating 39 analytes from the working document has been successfully validated for green bean, cabbage, grapefruit, leek and strawberry. We achieved acceptable z-scores in EUPT FV-18 for the two voluntary analytes in the test material using this method. We have also successfully validated and incorporated another 7 analytes from the working document into our existing GCMS suite. There are 13 analytes and 4 metabolites of interest for products of plant origin from the working document that we have not incorporated either because of cost/availability of reference standards or they are not amenable to multi- residue methods. Sample preparation 10g of cryomilled green beans samples were extracted using citrate QuEChERS method (matrix concentration ≡ 1g/ml ). No clean-up was employed. Sample extracts were then filtered (0.45µm PTFE). Calibration standards were prepared in (organic) green bean matrix. Set-up for the ABSciex 6500 QTRAP mass spectrometer and Shimadzu Nexera UHPLC ● Run time: 17 min ● Flow rate: 0.4 mL/min ● Mobile phase A: Methanol/H 2 O 5/95 v/v + 5mM ammonium acetate ● Mobile phase B: Methanol + 5mM ammonium acetate ● Column: Phenomenex Kinetex 2.6 μm, C18, 50 x 4.6 mm with Phenomenex Security Guard cartridge ● Injection volume: 3 μl Designed by SASA Photography Services Unit, May 2016. Text, graphics & photographs are all SASA © Crown copyright unless otherwise indicated. Kirsty Reid, Laura Melton and Michael J Taylor. Pesticides Branch, Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture, Roddinglaw Road, Edinburgh, EH12 9FJ. T: 0131 244 4038

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • SASA (Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture) is one of the United Kingdom’s (UK) official laboratories and we participate, on behalf of the Scottish Government, in the annual UK and EU statutory surveillance programmes that monitor various UK and imported food & drink for residues of pesticides, their metabolites and other degradation products.

    It is mandatory for official laboratories to analyse all pesticides listed in the EU multiannual control programme and to also participate in UK and EU proficiency testing schemes. The European Commission released an updated revision in December 2015 of the working document (SANCO/12745/2013 rev. 6 (3)) which included pesticides to be considered for inclusion in future national control programmes. We are systematically replacing our ethyl acetate (crude extract) LC/MSMS (QqQ) method with the citrate QuEChERS extraction without dispersive SPE clean-up and LC/MSMS (QTRAP). The new method which incorporates polarity switching is being used routinely and successfully to extend our target lists and specifically to include amenable pesticides (Tables 1 & 2) highlighted in the EC working document.

    In this poster we demonstrate the success of the method transfer with data generated from 39 of the pesticides highlighted in the working document. Presented data includes green bean validation data (Table 3), quantitative results from retail samples of speciality green beans (Table 4) which were analysed as part of the annual UK surveillance programme and EU Proficiency test data [EUPT-FV18 - Spinach] (Table 5).

    Utilising Citrate QuEChERS extraction without dispersive SPE clean-up and LCMSMS (QTRAP) multi-residue method to include pesticides from the European Commission working document

    Introduction

    Table 1. Positive MRM acquisition parameters.

    Pesticide Retentiontime Q1 Q3Declustering

    Potential (DP)Collision

    Energy (CE)Collision Exit

    Potential (CXP)Ametoctradin 1 7.27 276.1 176.1 141 51 10Ametoctradin 2 7.27 276.1 149 141 49 8Amitraz 1 9.96 294 163 31 21 10Amitraz 2 9.96 294 122 31 41 14Clomazone 1 4.17 240 125 46 27 14Clomazone 2 4.17 240 89 46 63 10Cyazofamid 1 5.37 324.9 107.8 26 21 16Cyazofamid 2 5.37 324.9 261 26 13 14Cyhalofop-butyl 1 7.28 375 256 26 21 14Cyhalofop-butyl 2 7.28 375 358 26 11 12Emamectin benzoate 1 10.38 886.4 158.1 20 41 10Emamectin benzoate 2 10.38 886.4 82 20 117 12Etoxazole 1 9.22 360 141 106 39 10Etoxazole 2 9.22 360 113 106 81 14Fenpyrazamine 1 4.95 332 230 36 25 14Fenpyrazamine 2 4.95 332 216 36 37 12Flufenacet 1 5.3 363.9 194 31 15 10Flufenacet 2 5.3 363.9 152 31 27 10Fluopicollide 1 4.76 384.8 174.9 37 31 10Fluopicollide 2 4.76 384.8 172.9 37 29 12Fluxapyroxad 1 4.67 381.9 362 71 19 10Fluxapyroxad 2 4.67 381.9 342 71 29 12Isopyrazam 1 7.1 360 244 106 31 14Isopyrazam 2 7.1 360 340.1 106 21 10Isoxaflutole 1 3.64 360.1 251 111 23 14Isoxaflutole 2 3.64 360.1 220 111 53 12Metconazole 1 6.51 320 69.9 16 63 8Metconazole 2 6.51 320 125 16 53 20Molinate 1 5.06 188.07 126 38 19 6Molinate 2 5.06 188.07 83 38 23 12Oxadiargyl 1 6.58 340.9 222.9 131 21 12Oxadiargyl 2 6.58 340.9 151 131 35 18Oxasulfuron 1 2.2 407 150.1 61 23 8Oxasulfuron 2 2.2 407 106.9 61 67 12Penflufen 1 5.96 318 234.1 76 23 12Penflufen 2 5.96 318 141 76 41 8Penthiopyrad 1 6.04 360 276 76 19 14Penthiopyrad 2 6.04 360 177 76 45 10Picolinafen 1 8.28 377 238 71 35 14Picolinafen 2 8.28 377 359 71 27 10Prochloraz 1 6.68 375.9 307.9 23 17 8Prochloraz 2 6.68 375.9 70 23 43 11Propaquizafop 1 8.08 444 100 26 23 12Propaquizafop 2 8.08 444 299 26 31 8Proquinazid 1 9.59 373 330.9 11 19 18Proquinazid 2 9.59 373 288.8 11 33 16Prosulfocarb 1 7.62 252 91 81 33 10Prosulfocarb 2 7.62 252 128 81 17 6Prothioconazole Desthio 1 5.53 311.9 69.9 16 55 8Prothioconazole Desthio 2 5.53 311.9 124.9 16 41 14Pyrethrins Cinerin I 1 9.32 316.9 149 36 13 8Pyrethrins Cinerin I 2 9.32 316.9 107 36 27 12Pyrethrins Cinerin II 1 7.29 360.9 149 51 13 8Pyrethrins Cinerin II 2 7.29 360.9 107 51 27 12Pyrethrins Jasmolin I 1 10.07 330.8 163 41 10 5Pyrethrins Jasmolin I 2 10.07 330.8 121 41 10 5Pyrethrins Jasmolin II 1 8.19 375 162.9 51 13 12Pyrethrins Jasmolin II 2 8.19 375 120.9 51 25 22Pyrethrins Pyrethrin I 1 9.42 328.8 161 41 12 10Pyrethrins Pyrethrin I 2 9.42 328.8 133 41 22 5Pyrethrins Pyrethrin II 1 7.45 373 161 46 13 8Pyrethrins Pyrethrin II 2 7.45 373 142.9 46 25 4Quinoclamine 1 2.99 208 104.9 86 33 12Quinoclamine 2 2.99 208 89.1 86 51 14Quizalofop-P-ethyl 1 7.75 373 299 101 25 16Quizalofop-P-ethyl 2 7.75 373 255 101 47 14Rotenone 1 5.67 395 213 117 31 12Rotenone 2 5.67 395 192 117 33 12Spirotetramat 1 5.17 374 216 61 45 12Spirotetramat 2 5.17 374 330.1 61 21 18Tri-allate 1 8.82 303.9 142.9 41 35 8Tri-allate 2 8.82 303.9 85.9 41 21 12Triticonazole 1 5.22 317.9 70 16 37 8Triticonazole 2 5.22 317.9 124.8 16 47 22

    Table 2. Negative MRM acquisition parameters.

    Pesticide Retentiontime Q1 Q3Declustering

    Potential (DP)Collision

    Energy (CE)Collision Exit

    Potential (CXP)2,4-DB neg 1 3.24 246.9 160.8 -5 -14 -92,4-DB neg 2 3.24 246.9 124.9 -5 -38 -9Ioxynil 1 2.57 369.7 126.7 -75 -38 -15Ioxynil 2 2.57 369.7 214.9 -75 -42 -9MCPA neg 1 2.57 198.9 141 -15 -20 -9MCPA neg 2 2.57 201 143 -15 -22 -8MCPB neg 1 3.27 227 141 -20 -14 -9MCPB neg 2 3.27 227 105 -20 -38 -13Quizalofop neg 1 3.43 343 271 -20 -20 -9Quizalofop neg 2 3.43 343 242.9 -20 -36 -13Triclopyr 1 2.65 255.9 197.7 -10 -16 -9Triclopyr 2 2.65 255.9 219.8 -10 -10 -13Tritosulfuron neg 1 2.48 443.9 193 -15 -20 -11Tritosulfuron neg 2 2.48 443.9 161 -15 -68 -111 denotes quantifier; 2 denotes qualifier

    Experimental

    Table 3. 2015-2016 green bean validation data.Mean Recovery %RSD Mean Recovery %RSD

    Pesticide 0.02 mg/kg 0.02 mg/kg 0.01 mg/kg 0.01 mg/kg2,4-DB 97 8 92 5Ametoctradin 106 1 99 4Amitraz 85 6 89 7Clomazone 101 2 97 2Cyazofamid 101 3 98 3Cyhalofop-butyl 102 2 100 3Emamectin benzoate 97 2 95 3Etoxazole 96 2 94 3Fenpyrazamine 93 2 95 2Flufenacet 101 2 81 8Fluopicolide 100 5 73 11Fluxapyroxad 101 2 80 8Ioxynil 98 1 79 7Isopyrazam 100 2 98 4Isoxaflutole 103 2 101 5MCPA 94 2 94 3MCPB 97 2 97 3Metconazole 95 5 76 5Molinate 102 2 98 2Oxadiargyl 100 1 99 2Oxasulfuron 103 3 100 6Penflufen 92 1 96 2Penthiopyrad 99 1 98 4Picolinafen 97 1 96 3Prochloraz 97 2 79 7Propaquizafop 96 1 79 6Proquinazid 98 2 96 2Prosulfocarb 101 2 99 2Prothioconazole Desthio 95 2 75 7Pyrethrins Cinerin I 117 4 117 3Pyrethrins Cinerin II 114 9 112 16Pyrethrins Jasmolin I 113 8 107 8Pyrethrins Jasmolin II 116 7 111 14 Pyrethrins Pyrethrin I 97 5 101 8Pyrethrins Pyrethrin II 98 5 101 10Quinoclamine 98 3 99 5Quizalofop 94 2 92 3Quizalofop-P-ethyl 99 1 97 2Rotenone 91 4 75 12Spirotetramat 99 2 98 3Tri-allate 101 2 97 3Triclopyr 93 1 91 2Triticonazole 1 99 4 75 7Tritosulfuron 102 1 99 2n = 6

    ResultsTable 4. Results from 2015 green bean samples.Sample Description Country of Origin Residue Conc. (mg/kg) Maximum Residue Level (mg/kg)

    Papi Beans Bangladesh Emamectin Benzoate B1a 0.02 0.01Uri beans Malaysia Emamectin Benzoate B1a 0.01 0.01

    Hyacinth beans Bangladesh Emamectin Benzoate B1a 0.08 0.01

    Table 5. Recent preliminary results form 2016 European Union Proficiency Test on spinach (EUPT-FV-18).Pesticide Reported Value Assigned Value Z-ScoreCyazofamid 0.25 0.279 -0.4Fenpyrazamine 0.38 0.357 0.3

    Conclusion

    The method incorporating 39 analytes from the working document has been successfully validated for green bean, cabbage, grapefruit, leek and strawberry. We achieved acceptable z-scores in EUPT FV-18 for the two voluntary analytes in the test material using this method. We have also successfully validated and incorporated another 7 analytes from the working document into our existing GCMS suite. There are 13 analytes and 4 metabolites of interest for products of plant origin from the working document that we have not incorporated either because of cost/availability of reference standards or they are not amenable to multi-residue methods.

    Sample preparation

    10g of cryomilled green beans samples were extracted using citrate QuEChERS method (matrix concentration ≡ 1g/ml ). No clean-up was employed. Sample extracts were then filtered (0.45µm PTFE). Calibration standards were prepared in (organic) green bean matrix.

    Set-up for the ABSciex 6500 QTRAP mass spectrometer and Shimadzu Nexera UHPLC

    ● Run time: 17 min● Flow rate: 0.4 mL/min● Mobile phase A: Methanol/H2O 5/95 v/v + 5mM ammonium acetate ● Mobile phase B: Methanol + 5mM ammonium acetate ● Column: Phenomenex Kinetex 2.6 μm, C18, 50 x 4.6 mm with Phenomenex Security Guard cartridge ● Injection volume: 3 μl

    Designed by SASA Photography Services Unit, May 2016. Text, graphics & photographs are all SASA © Crown copyright unless otherwise indicated.

    Kirsty Reid, Laura Melton and Michael J Taylor. Pesticides Branch, Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture, Roddinglaw Road, Edinburgh, EH12 9FJ. T: 0131 244 4038

    _GoBack