utep lighting design criteria (8!29!10)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 UTEP Lighting Design Criteria (8!29!10)
1/4
-
7/29/2019 UTEP Lighting Design Criteria (8!29!10)
2/4
El Paso Electric SCORE Program 2010 Page 2
I I . LINEAR FLUORESCENT T5 LIGHTING SYSTEMSA. T5HO LAMPS - 49W T5HO lamps are preferred over 54W T5HO in most high bay applications for increased energy savings with comparable
lumen output.
B. T5 LAMPS (2, 3, 4) - Standard output T5 lamps are generally not recommended. Instead, Super T8 lamps are recommended over T5 lamps inspace applications such as classrooms, offices, hallways, etc. for the following reasons:1. Superior lamp life2. Comparable lumen output3. Superior energy efficiency4. Materials cost first cost and maintenance costs5. Compatibility for lamp/ballast retrofit applications of T12 or older T8 systems without requiring new fixture installation.
I I I . HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE LIGHTINGHigh intensity discharge (HID) lamps are rarely appropriate for indoor use due to their low CRI, high energy usage and rated life expectancy. Because HID
fixtures can be replaced by more-efficient high bay fluorescent (HBF) fixtures, induction lamps or compact fluorescent lamps, HID lamps should not be used
for indoor lighting.
IV. HIGH BAY FL UORESCENT LIGHTINGHigh bay fluorescent (HBF) fixtures are to be installed in areas with high ceilings such as gymnasiums. The three primary types of HBF fixtures are as
follows; refer to lamp criteria above:1. 6-lamp 4-ft T8 fixture (with ballast factor of 1.0) typical 400W HID replacement2. 4-lamp 4-ft T5HO fixture typical 400W HID replacement
3. 6-lamp 4-ft T5HO fixture typical > 400W HID replacement
V. COMPACT FLUORESCENT LIGHTINGThe following table provides guidelines for common compact fluorescent lighting replacements for incandescent applications.
INCANDESCENT LIGHTBULBS
MINIMUM LIGHT OUTPUT COMMON ENERGY STARQUALIFIED LIGHT BULBS
WATTS LUMENS WATTS
40 450 9 - 13
60 800 13 - 15
75 1,100 18 - 25
100 1,600 23 - 30
150 2,600 30 - 52
-
7/29/2019 UTEP Lighting Design Criteria (8!29!10)
3/4
El Paso Electric SCORE Program 2010 Page 3
VI . LI GHTING-LEVEL REQUIREMENTSLighting to be designed such that illumination levels fall within a given range, according to the space type. Average lighting levels are not to fall below theranges lower limit and not to exceed the ranges upper limit. This is to assure all spaces are adequately lit but are not over-lit. The ranges apply to all
working areas in a space, and should be sustained throughout lamp life. The following footcandle (fc) ranges are derived primarily from IESNA
recommended levels and NCAA gymnasium lighting best practices.
Space Type* Lighting Level Range (fc)Classroom 30 50
Science Lab 50 70
Library 30 50Office 30 50
Computer Lab 3 30
Corridor / Common Space 10 20Gym (recreational) 30 50
Gym (standard intercollegiate) 50 100Gym (NCAA broadcasting) 100 150Cafeteria 10 20
Kitchen 30 50
Pool 5 50
Parking Garage 10 20Restroom 5 15
Mechanical Room 20 50
* IESNA recommended lighting levels to be used for other space-types not listed above.
VII. EXTERIOR LIGHTING No Sodium lamps will be allowedA. PATH/STEP All path lighting to be _____. No encased step lighting will be permitted with prior written authorization.B. PEDESTRIAN (3-0 TO 15-0) All pedestrian lighting to be ______.C. STREET (15-0 to 30-0) All street lighting to be _(250W Metal halide, 400W Metal Halide, or equivalent induction lamp).D. HIGH MAST (30-0 and up) All high mast lighting to be _______.
VIII. LIGHTING CONTROLSA. INTERIOR - All interior spaces to be controlled via dual technology (infrared & ultrasonic) occupancy sensors for energy conservation. In areas
needing a minimum level of security or stumble lighting, provide occasional full light fixtures or select of the lamps within necessary light
fixtures to be controlled by a hot circuit with the remaining fixtures or lamps controlled by the occupancy sensor.
B. EXTERIOR - Exterior light fixtures to be controlled via photocell for energy conservation. Provide security lighting connected to a hot circuit asneeded for security camera operation.
-
7/29/2019 UTEP Lighting Design Criteria (8!29!10)
4/4
El Paso Electric SCORE Program 2010 Page 4
IX. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR COMMON SPACE-TYPESThe following table summarizes the lighting power densities found in standard design practice for various space types. Also presented are the IESNArecommended lighting level ranges for the space types, which should be followed to maintain comfortable lighting levels and energy-efficient lighting
design. When lighting designs meet such lighting levels and energy-efficient lighting technology is used, better lighting power densities will be achieved, as
indicated by Mid-Efficiency LPD and High-Efficiency LPD values in the table. The increased SCORE incentive and annual electricity cost savings forthese higher-efficiency designs are presented in the table as well.
Standard
Design
MidEff.
Design
HighEff.
Design
MidEfficiency
Designabove
StandardDesign
HighEfficiency
Designabove
Standard
Design
Classroom 30 50 1.1 1.5 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.9 $0 $60 $60 $80 $80 $120 $0 $60 $20 $90
Lab 50 70 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.4 0.7 1.1 $0 $10 $10 $50 $50 $110 $0 $50 $30 $90
Office 30 50 1.2 1.8 0.9 1.2 0.6 0.9 $0 $40 $40 $80 $80 $120 $0 $90 $30 $110
ComputerLab 3 30 1.0 1.6 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.6 $0 $70 $70 $120 $120 $150 $0 $100 $40 $110
Corridor/Common
Space10 20 0.8 1.0 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.6 $70 $100 $100 $120 $120 $150 $0 $40 $20 $60
LibraryGeneral
Space 30
50 1.9
2.7 1.1
1.9 0.8
1.1 $0 $0
$50 $50
$100 $0
$150 $80
$180
ParkingGarage 10 20 0.25 0.3 0.2 0.25 0.15 0.2 $0 $10 $10 $20 $20 $30 $0 $30 $20 $50
Cafeteria 10 20 1.2 1.8 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.6 $0 $40 $40 $120 $120 $150 $0 $110 $60 $130
Kitchen 30 50 1.1 1.9 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.9 $0 $50 $50 $80 $80 $110 $0 $90 $20 $110
Gymnasium(non
competition)5 30 1.8 2.3 0.8 1.8 0.4 0.8 $0 $0 $100 $100 $150 $0 $140 $90 $180
Gymnasium
(competition)50 100 1.6 2.6 1.3 1.6 0.8 1.3 $0 $0 $30 $30 $100 $0 $120 $30 $170
Pool 15 50 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.6 $60 $100 $100 $120 $120 $150 $0 $50 $20 $70aThe SCOREincentivei s $185pe rkWsaved.
bThe estimatedannual electricitycostsavings i s basedon UTEP's electricrateof$0.04338/kWh.
EstimatedSCOREIncentive
per1,000ft2
a
EstimatedAnnualElectricityCost
Savingsper1,000ft2($year)
b
Application
IESNA
Recommended
LightLevels(fc)
Typical
Standard
LPD
(W/ft2)
High
Efficiency
LPD
(W/ft2)
Mid
Efficiency
LPD
(W/ft2)