using technology transformation effectively to improve it business alignment

Pritam [email protected]

Using Technology Transformation Effectively to Improve Business-IT Alignment

20092009

AgendaAgenda

Case StudyCase Study

What Went Wrong?What Went Wrong?

What Can We Do Differently?What Can We Do Differently?

• IT Roadmap• IT Roadmap

• Enterprise Architecture• Enterprise Architecture

• Application Portfolio Optimization (APO)• Application Portfolio Optimization (APO)

• Business-IT Alignment• Business-IT Alignment

• Service-oriented Architecture (SOA)• Service-oriented Architecture (SOA)

• IT Governance• IT Governance

• Technology Transformation• Technology Transformation

• IT Strategy• IT Strategy

Putting It All TogetherPutting It All Together

Case Study

Consider a scenario:

A national retail bank in India, with hundreds of subsidiaries and branches, decided to automate its operations and move its services online. Since most of its services are common across all its branches, the bank decided to implement a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) to increase the interoperability. It was decided that the corporate IT group would be in charge of execution of the complete project, including the implementation of SOA and definition of its services. Needless to say, the project started with much optimism and excitement.

However six months into the project, it ran into roadblocks. Cracks started to become visible. There were frequent disagreements among the various business units on who is responsible for defining and administering the SOA services. Who is responsible for the overall governance of the project? Some groups have also questioned corporate IT’s shortsightedness of not carefully considering the complexity of integrating existing applications built across diverse platforms and technologies. The need for a clear IT strategy and technology roadmap was clearly felt.

A year later, the project was scrapped. It became impossible to execute the project without a well-defined IT Roadmap, Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance mechanisms.

What went wrong?

A national retail bank in India, with hundreds of subsidiaries and branches, decided to automate its operations and move its services online. Since most of its services are common across all its branches, the bank decided to implement a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) to increase the interoperability. It was decided that the corporate IT group would be in charge of execution of the complete project, including the implementation of SOA and definition of its services. Needless to say, the project started with much optimism and excitement.

However six months into the project, it ran into roadblocks. Cracks started to become visible. There were frequent disagreements among the various business units on who is responsible for defining and administering the SOA services. Who is responsible for the overall governance of the project? Some groups have also questioned corporate IT’s shortsightedness of not carefully considering the complexity of integrating existing applications built across diverse platforms and technologies. The need for a clear IT strategy and technology roadmap was clearly felt.

A year later, the project was scrapped. It became impossible to execute the project without a well-defined IT Roadmap, Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance mechanisms.

What went wrong?

What Went Wrong?

SOA is a paradigm for organizing and utilizing distributed capabilities that may be under the control of different ownership domains. It provides a uniform means to offer, discover, interact with and use capabilities to produce desired effects consistent with measurable preconditions and expectations. - OASIS Group

IT Roadmap• A technology roadmap was not clearly defined.

• How would the existing applications be integrated/upgraded?

• How would the bank stay attuned with constantly evolving technology?

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)• Was the decision to implement SOA carefully considered by taking into account the interoperability and a

need for a federation of resources?

• Was an SOA Governance Structure created to resolve trust issues across teams?

• How would the SOA security issues be handled?

IT Governance• Was a clearly defined Governance structure established to ensure that the organization’s IT sustains the

organization’s strategies and objectives?

• Did the board understand the overall architecture of its company’s IT applications portfolio?

IT - Business Alignment• Did the organization take a broader view of the business strategies and objectives and realize how IT is

going to sustain and extend them ?

• Was there a sincere effort to increase the value of IT projects and reduce the gap between IT and business?

What Can We Do Differently?

“Winners don’t do different things, they do things differently.”

- Shiv Khera

IT – Business Alignment

There is an increased call for CIOs to broaden their scope of action by adopting new levers, roles, and governance practices that go beyond the purely technical and traditional IT capabilities. – McKinsey- CIGREF (the association of French CIOs) collaboration

Understand the business priorities• Understand expectations about IT and formulate them in business terms

• Proactively propose business – IT initiative

• Ensure faultless execution

Take action tightly synchronized with business units

• Rank priorities and sequence levers to be used

• Take a position on cross-functional projects

Build alliances and develop new skills

• Develop non-IT skills

• Be collaborative

• Reinforce IT’s cross-functionality

Find levers where IT and business units intersect

Source: McKinsey Quarterly: How CIOs should think about business value

IT - Business Alignment: Best Practices

Source: CIO: How to Close the IT-Business Alignment Gap

All levels and all functions of the business must be accountable and work on their part of executing the corporate strategy.

Start with Corporate

Strategy and Objectives

Take a Holistic View

Highlight the

Requirements Gap

Have a long-term roadmap

Accountability

Design, build, and roll-out systems with a long-term IT roadmap. The roadmap should make some simple distinctions such as layers of information-value in the organization. It should also layer applications in the overall system architecture.

Business/IT alignment happens when the gap between bottom-up and top-down is bridged. Big gap, low alignment.

Take a holistic view when a business unit comes with a problem. Who else needs to see this information? How will this information be made “actionable” so we can watch trends over time, adjust for seasonality, compare with forecasts, and eventually fire unprofitable customers.

Directly correlate all IT initiatives with overall Corporate Strategy. IT should be able to show multiple correlations from many systems to many strategic objectives. More correlations, high alignment.

A recent article in Harvard Business Review (“Radically Simple IT,” March 2008) advocates that Business and IT shouldn’t just be aligned, they should be “forged together.” One way to do this is by having the CIO report directly to the CEO or COO, not the CFO.

Technology Transformation

Source: HCL Technologies

Use technology transformation services to align your business needs and thereby ensure operational efficiency

Desired Output

Analyze IT landscape• Create outsourcing plans

• Create IT portfolio

Operational Cost Savings

Operational Cost Savings

Analyze business processes; create IT roadmap• Re-engineer business processes

• Create IT Strategy

• Create IT Governance structure

• Application Portfolio Consolidation

Business Process Efficiency

Business Process Efficiency

Optimize IT portfolio; align IT with business• Application Portfolio Optimization

• IT Architecture Engineering

• Knowledge Management

IT-Business Alignment

IT-Business Alignment

Technology Transformation ensure that IT systems do not become a drag but are optimized and managed so as to transform business functions by being better-aligned to business needs while ensuring operational efficiency. – HCL Technologies

IT Strategy

Innovation Capacity: the potential for the IT function to support new products, processes, and opportunities. Successful companies will grow their IT innovation capacity by focusing in how IT is sponsored, operated, and governed. - Forrester Research

An effective IT Strategy plan helps to increase IT-business alignment, improve IT governance, boost IT value and prioritize IT investments.

Source: CIO Roadmap – The IT Strategic Plan Step-By-Step

Value

Proposition

• Helps to maintain short-term and long-term business goals

• Helps to identify gaps between current and future IT architecture

• Helps to fill in the identified gaps

• Helps to adapt to changing trends and technologies

• Helps to maintain short-term and long-term business goals

• Helps to identify gaps between current and future IT architecture

• Helps to fill in the identified gaps

• Helps to adapt to changing trends and technologies

Five Phases of IT Strategic Plan Development

Devising and revising IT strategic plan should be a core management capability, and an annual activity. When you create one for the first time, you might find that it isn’t as complete or as streamlined as you might like. Use each pass through the strategic planning process to capture learnings and apply them to the next version - Forrester Research

IT’s strategic plan is an essential tool for running IT like a business. It is purpose-driven and a complement to IT governance structures and processes.

Phase One

Define Your Plan’s Purpose

• Assess context: How does IT fit into the firm’s strategy and operations

• Identify your stakeholders

• Define the strategic plan’s purpose

• Develop a straw man to validate your start

Phase Two

Capture And Evaluate Business Needs

• Identify what type of business input is relevant

• Identify your information sources

• Capture and organize business needs into patterns

Phase Three

Assess IT’s Ability to Support Validated Needs

• Evaluate implications of the business needs

• Develop IT “to be” state or vision

• Evaluate the gaps




Phase Four

Develop Your Plan to Close The Gaps

• Develop or revise your strategic IT principles

• Identify gap-closing initiatives

• Determine key performance indicators (KPIs)

• Build an integrated roadmap

Phase Five

Finalize The Strategic Plan And Roll It Out

• Communicate broadly

• Institute KPI tracking

• Schedule strategic plan reviews




Phases of Strategic Plan Development And On-Going Review

IT Roadmap

Business-IT alignment can be greatly increased by taking into consideration Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) considerations. A well-designed IT Roadmap can help to implement and refine GRC practices within an organization.

Source: CIO – Your IT Roadmap For Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance

Step One

IT Principles & Strategy

Discuss how IT can support GRC needs, including

• Information needs

• Process / transaction needs

• Control / monitoring needs

• Documentation / system of record needs

Step Two

“AS-IS” Situation

Make an inventory of all processes and technology

• What do we already have in place?

• Who owns and maintains these systems?

• Who operates them?

• What do they really do?

Information systems and IT have become essential for the implementation of business activities in companies. In order for a business enterprise to make a suitable IT investment, it must be able to forecast the trends of significant technologies that will become available in the future and map out a technical strategy (IT Roadmap) based on such a forecast.

IT Roadmap


Step Three

“TO-BE” Vision

Define, enhance, and evolve an enterprise architecture that supports GRC needs

• Leverage existing technology investments

• Consolidate technology to serve multiple GRC areas

• Integrate technology into core business processes to serve GRC needs

Step Four

Priorities, Projects, Budgets & Ownership

Define priorities and specific projects to phase into ultimate vision

• Start in a specific area and expand

• Avoid “big bang” solutions

• Consider parallel operation of “high stakes” system

• Assign ownership and accountability

The description of “target state” is of paramount importance for the IT strategic planning. Lack of clear understanding of the “target state” deprives IT from the very fundamentals required for strategic planning. The important task CIO should set for himself or herself: to help the business to shape this “target state” at least to the point sufficient for IT management to plan how technology organization is going to enable the company future.

IT Roadmap: Maturity Levels of GRC

While aligning IT with business, companies must understand their level of GRC maturity. Some of the basic maturity levels for GRC are:


No awareness of interdependence of GRC and

IT resources

No awareness of interdependence of GRC and

IT resources

Limited understanding of GRC; no common platform for GRC

Limited understanding of GRC; no common platform for GRC

Understanding of the need to integrate GRC with IT

Understanding of the need to integrate GRC with IT

Businesses align and leverage GRC to realize GRC benefits, growth, profitability and asset

utilization

Businesses align and leverage GRC to realize GRC benefits, growth, profitability and asset

utilization

Highest level of GRC maturity. Businesses use a common language and set of metrics to continuously

improve the platform YoY

Highest level of GRC maturity. Businesses use a common language and set of metrics to continuously

improve the platform YoY Level 5

Level 1

Level 5

Level 1

By themselves, GRC initiatives aren’t necessarily good or bad. But, depending on how organizations choose to interpret and implement them, they can be. Organizations should use the maturity model and GRC steps to help ensure more strategic alignment between their IT strategy and their GRC initiatives.

Enterprise Architecture

The Enterprise Architecture guides an organization’s project portfolio and the development of solutions. It becomes an intrinsic part of the overall design and governance continuum for a business, with the top down process of realizing business strategy and goals through the architecture supplemented with learning from the experience of implementation.

Aligning project architectures to an overall Enterprise Architecture bridges the gap between business/IT strategy and solution development.

Source: Capgemini – Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework

Expand IT ReachExpand IT Reach

You can collaborate more effectively than your competition with your customers, suppliers and partners through your IT

You can collaborate more effectively than your competition with your customers, suppliers and partners through your IT

Increase Business AgilityIncrease Business Agility

You can continuously adapt your business (by changing your IT) more quickly and with lower risk than your competition

You can continuously adapt your business (by changing your IT) more quickly and with lower risk than your competition

Increase Project SuccessIncrease Project Success

You can significantly improve your success with your investment in IT enabled business projects

You can significantly improve your success with your investment in IT enabled business projects

Reduce IT CostReduce IT Cost

You can deliver new IT solutions and manage your existing IT services at lower cost than your competition

You can deliver new IT solutions and manage your existing IT services at lower cost than your competition

Reduce CostReduce Cost

The Value of Architecture

Integrated Architecture Framework (IAF)

Architecture is all about the business! Even for IT-centric projects, the solution must deliver business value and clearly align to the business direction if it is to be successful. For architecture to be able to deliver this, all decisions must be clearly justified and traceable back to business needs. The IAF provides the basis on which these architectures are delivered.

IAF enables the architecture to be defined and justified in business terms and provides a reference model for planning, design and implementation.

Source: Capgemini – Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework

The Integrated Architecture Framework

The IAF:

•Provides a model for architecture development and usage

•Describes the format and content of elements of the architecture

•Specifies the way in which these elements relate to each other

The IAF:

•Provides a model for architecture development and usage

•Describes the format and content of elements of the architecture

•Specifies the way in which these elements relate to each other

Application Portfolio Optimization (APO)

In the IT context, an “application portfolio” is defined as a cluster of IT applications, infrastructure (hardware, software, tools), IT projects or a set of resources, skills and relationships. This IT assets portfolios constitute the “building blocks” that are used to deliver competitive advantage to the business.

APO helps transform IT environments to align more directly with business priorities. It helps to reduce maintenance and development lifecycle costs and improve technology investment decisions.

Strategic Alignment

Technical Quality

Business Quality

• Assess

• Optimize

• Govern

• As-Is Study

• Prioritize AP

• Outsourcing Viability

•Outsource Quick-Win Apps

• Measure Results

IT Sourcing

AP Management

AP Consolidation

APO

Assessment

Transformation

Service-oriented Architecture (SOA)

SOA is an architectural style that emphasizes well-defined, loosely coupled, coarse-grained, business-centric, reusable shared services. It’s an IT approach in which applications rely on services available on a network such as a web to facilitate business processes. – Sun Microsystems

SOA offers the best opportunity for delivering the architectural flexibility necessary to achieve significant reductions in time to market (TTM) and total cost of ownership (TCO) for new business and IT services.

Source: Sun Microsystems, Infosys POV

BenefitsBenefits

Common MistakesCommon Mistakes

ChallengesChallenges

• Reduced time to market (TTM) for new services • Reduced total cost of ownership (TCO) of IT infrastructure and business services

• Reduced time to market (TTM) for new services • Reduced total cost of ownership (TCO) of IT infrastructure and business services

• Failure to assess SOA maturity level and defining appropriate roadmap • Failure to obtain buy-in from all stakeholders and internal application owners • Failure to identify common data models leading to frequent changes • Tendency to

build point-to-point interfaces even with SOA • Failure to setup a PMO team for audits and reviews for SOA Governance

• Failure to assess SOA maturity level and defining appropriate roadmap • Failure to obtain buy-in from all stakeholders and internal application owners • Failure to identify common data models leading to frequent changes • Tendency to

build point-to-point interfaces even with SOA • Failure to setup a PMO team for audits and reviews for SOA Governance

• Simple, easily consumed, complexity hiding interfaces • Open-ended future reuse • Technical complexity of implementing with each support system • Cross-

Line-of-Business coordination required • Logic with service flows that can differ from the underlying logic • Security needs of services differing from the supporting

applications security • Services as separately managed IT components

• Simple, easily consumed, complexity hiding interfaces • Open-ended future reuse • Technical complexity of implementing with each support system • Cross-

Line-of-Business coordination required • Logic with service flows that can differ from the underlying logic • Security needs of services differing from the supporting

applications security • Services as separately managed IT components

Testing ChallengesTesting Challenges• Services may not have a user interface • Data-gathering • High-level of

integration requires better planning and strategy to address availability problems • Need to ensure excellent exception management • Reuse challenges • Learning curve

• Services may not have a user interface • Data-gathering • High-level of integration requires better planning and strategy to address availability problems • Need to ensure excellent exception management • Reuse challenges • Learning curve

SOA Best Practices

SOA enables organizations to leverage their current IT investments to keep pace with today’s demands for business agility. Leveraging SOA, they can help transform their IT infrastructure from monolithic rigid architectures to a flexible and agile platform. HCL Technologies

Source: SOA Governance: Framework and Best Practices, An Oracle White Paper

ArchitectureArchitecture

TechnologyTechnology

• Align architecture principles across lines of business by creating reference architectures

• Centralize the creation of standards, policies, and processes

• Align architecture principles across lines of business by creating reference architectures

• Centralize the creation of standards, policies, and processes

• Select technical solutions and vendor partners that adhere to industry standards

• Select technical solutions and vendor partners that adhere to industry standards

InformationInformation

• Establish an enterprise data management function to define and monitor enforcement of data governance. This group should establish policies and procedures that cut across multiple departments

• Enforce security policies at the data service layer using tools that enable declarative policy definition centrally and localized enforcement throughout the enterprise

• Establish an enterprise data management function to define and monitor enforcement of data governance. This group should establish policies and procedures that cut across multiple departments

• Enforce security policies at the data service layer using tools that enable declarative policy definition centrally and localized enforcement throughout the enterprise

FinancialFinancial• Use a multilayer financial strategy to justify SOA investments

• Consider central funding for services that are to be used across departments

• Use a multilayer financial strategy to justify SOA investments

• Consider central funding for services that are to be used across departments

PortfoliosPortfolios• The SOA approach should focus on high-value business processes

• EA and SOA should be driven by multiyear strategic plans that integrate business and IT goals

• The SOA approach should focus on high-value business processes

• EA and SOA should be driven by multiyear strategic plans that integrate business and IT goals

PeoplePeople • Provide enterprise SOA training for managers and stakeholders as well as architects, developers, PMs, BAs, and QAs.

• Provide enterprise SOA training for managers and stakeholders as well as architects, developers, PMs, BAs, and QAs.

SOA Best Practices

Source: SOA Governance: Framework and Best Practices, An Oracle White Paper

Project ExecutionProject Execution

OperationsOperations

• Utilize a service registry to catalogue existing services and define processes to identify and submit potentially sharable services

• Utilize a service registry to catalogue existing services and define processes to identify and submit potentially sharable services

• Centralize SOA operations and support until greater maturity is realized

• Deploy a Web services management solution for runtime policy enforcement through distributed policy enforcement points

• Centralize SOA operations and support until greater maturity is realized

• Deploy a Web services management solution for runtime policy enforcement through distributed policy enforcement points

Six Steps to Successful Governance with SOA

Six Steps to Successful Governance with SOA

• Step 1: Establish SOA goals and strategies that are tightly aligned with the business

• Step 2: Establish SOA goals, standards, policies, and procedures proportionate to SOA maturity

• Step 3: Define clear metrics that are obtainable and can show progress in maturing SOA and EA efforts

• Step 4: Put repeatable and well-defined governance in place and capture the metrics defined in steps 2 and 3

• Automate as many of the governance processes and collection of metrics as possible

• Step 5: SOA and EA should leverage kaizen concepts from manufacturing domain

• Step 6: As SOA maturity increases, policies should be enacted in order to deliver on SOA and business objectives

• Step 1: Establish SOA goals and strategies that are tightly aligned with the business

• Step 2: Establish SOA goals, standards, policies, and procedures proportionate to SOA maturity

• Step 3: Define clear metrics that are obtainable and can show progress in maturing SOA and EA efforts

• Step 4: Put repeatable and well-defined governance in place and capture the metrics defined in steps 2 and 3

• Automate as many of the governance processes and collection of metrics as possible

• Step 5: SOA and EA should leverage kaizen concepts from manufacturing domain

• Step 6: As SOA maturity increases, policies should be enacted in order to deliver on SOA and business objectives

SOA is part of enterprise architecture, and should be driven by strategic and tactical business goals and objectives.

SOA Tidbits

Source: Sun Microsystems

SOA’s core vision is a global computing model that eliminates interoperability roadblocks. SOA’s core vision is a global computing model that eliminates interoperability roadblocks.

Only through loosely coupled collaboration do you get the true value of SOA.Only through loosely coupled collaboration do you get the true value of SOA.

No one company has fully defined the set of infrastructure services that are needed to fully complete an SOA platform, because the whole platform concept is still in its infancy.No one company has fully defined the set of infrastructure services that are needed to fully complete an SOA platform, because the whole platform concept is still in its infancy.

Developers should not wait until standards get sorted out before adopting SOA.Developers should not wait until standards get sorted out before adopting SOA.

SOA is the next big thing. It’s good for another 5 to 10 years. Just as the web changed the world, so will SOA.SOA is the next big thing. It’s good for another 5 to 10 years. Just as the web changed the world, so will SOA.

Make SOA loosely couple and coarse grained, and have a top-down approach.Make SOA loosely couple and coarse grained, and have a top-down approach.

IT Governance

IT Governance refers to putting together structures around how organizations align IT strategy with business strategy to ensure that they stay on track to achieve their organization objectives, in addition to implementing ways by which IT performance can be measured and optimized. IT Governance is a subset discipline of corporate governance that ensures that all stakeholders interests are taken into account and that processes provide measurable results.

An IT Governance solution helps businesses align IT spending with business strategy by combining the value of portfolio optimization with the power of improved execution.

Source: HCL Technologies: IT Governance

DriversDrivers

Key AreasKey Areas

BenefitsBenefits

• Misalignment between business and IT • Regulatory compliance • Reduced productivity • Absence of well defined processes • Confrontation with

reduced budgets and increased expectation • No visibility for management to track key performance and quality parameters

• Misalignment between business and IT • Regulatory compliance • Reduced productivity • Absence of well defined processes • Confrontation with

reduced budgets and increased expectation • No visibility for management to track key performance and quality parameters

• Portfolio Management • Program Management • Performance Measures • Resource Management • Financial Management • Time Management •

Deployment Management

• Portfolio Management • Program Management • Performance Measures • Resource Management • Financial Management • Time Management •

Deployment Management

• Business-based decision making • Closer IT-business alignment • Predictable project outcomes • “Moment of Truth” for IT • Record for what IT

is doing • Top-down / Bottom-up values alignment • Better IT governance compliant with regulatory specification • Cost reductions & productivity

increase

• Business-based decision making • Closer IT-business alignment • Predictable project outcomes • “Moment of Truth” for IT • Record for what IT

is doing • Top-down / Bottom-up values alignment • Better IT governance compliant with regulatory specification • Cost reductions & productivity

increase

IT Governance – Ten Principles

IT Governance refers to putting together structures around how organizations align IT strategy with business strategy to ensure that they stay on track to achieve their organization objectives, in addition to implementing ways by which IT performance can be measured and optimized. IT Governance is a subset discipline of corporate governance that ensures that all stakeholders interests are taken into account and that processes provide measurable results.

Source: IT Governance: HBS Press (Peter Weill and Jeanne W. Ross)

Actively Design GovernanceManagement should actively design IT governance around the enterprise’s objectives and performance goals. Focus on having the fewest number of effective mechanisms possible.

Know When to RedesignGovernance redesign should be infrequent. A change in governance is required with a change in desirable behavior.

Involve Senior ManagersCIOs and senior managers must be effectively involved in IT governance for success. Communicate IT governance on one page.

Make ChoicesGood governance requires choices. Governance can and should highlight conflicting goals for debate.

Clarify Exception-Handling ProcessExceptions are how enterprises learn. Formally approved exceptions benefit organizations by formalizing organizational learning about technology and architecture.

Provide Right IncentivesIT governance is more effective when incentive and reward systems are aligned with organizational goals.

Assign Ownership and Accountability

for IT Governance

IT governance must have an owner and accountabilities. The board or CEO must hold the CIO or a committee accountable for IT governance performance with some clear measures of success.

Design Governance at Multiple

Organizational Levels

Consider IT governance at several levels. The starting point is enterprise-wide IT governance driven by a small number of enterprise-wide strategies and goals.

Provide Transparency and EducationThe more education on IT governance, the more transparency. The more transparency of the governance processes, the more confidence in the governance.

Implement Common MechanismsEnterprises using the same mechanisms to govern more than one of the six key assets have better governance.

Putting It All Together

Recommendations for the Case Study

Business – IT Alignment• Take a broader view of the business strategies and objectives and realize how IT is going to sustain and extend them

Technology Transformation• Use technology transformation services to align your business needs and thereby ensure operational efficiency

IT Strategy• Develop an IT strategy that would help to identify and close gaps between current and future IT architecture

IT Roadmap• Develop an IT Roadmap to implement and refine Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance practices

within an organization

Enterprise Architecture• Align project architectures to an overall Enterprise Architecture to bridge the gap between business/IT strategy and

solution development

Application Portfolio Optimization• Review application portfolio to optimize IT applications and assets and improve technology investments decisions

Service-oriented Architecture• Leverage SOA practices to facilitate interoperability between your services

IT Governance• Put together a governance structure to stay on track to achieve organizational objectives

References

CA, “IT Governance – An Integrated Framework and Roadmap,” 2006

Capgemini, “Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework,” 2006

CIO Roadmap, “The IT Strategic Plan Step-By-Step,” 2007

CIO: “How to Close the IT-Business Alignment Gap,” 2009

Compuware, “Integrated IT Portfolio Management: Align business objectives with IT decisions,” 2007

Forrester, “Defining IT Portfolio Management,” 2004

HBS Press, “IT Governance,”

HCL Technologies, “Technology Transformation Services,” 2009

IBM, “Adopting SOA Best Practices and Lessons Learned”, 2009

IBM, “Application Portfolio Management Services,” 2009

IBM, “APM: From assessment to transformation”, 2003

Infosys, “POV: Application Portfolio Management,” 2005

Infosys, “POV: SOA Offers Best of Both Worlds,” 2008

McKinsey Quarterly, “How CIOs should think about business value,” 2009

Oracle, “SOA Governance: Framework and Best Practices,” 2007

Sun Microsystems, “SOA Best Practices: A Conversation With Mark Hapner,” 2006

Sun Microsystems, “The Next Big Thing: SOA Takes a New Route,” 2005

Sun Microsystems, “Assessing Your SOA Readiness,” 2004

THANK YOU

For questions and feedback, email

[email protected]

For questions and feedback, email

[email protected]

APPENDIX

Business Process Re-Engineering

Source: HCL Technologies

using technology transformation effectively to improve it business alignment

Technology

business value

business alignment gap

business priorities

business terms

various business units

harvard business review

technology roadmap

soa services