using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

26
Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods high in added sugar, sodium and saturated fats Barry Popkin W. R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished University Professor Department of Nutrition Gillings School of Global Public Health School of Medicine Department of Economics The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill THE W RLD IS FAT

Upload: others

Post on 04-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Using front-of-the-package warning

labels to remove foods high in added

sugar, sodium and saturated fats

Barry PopkinW. R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished University Professor

Department of Nutrition

Gillings School of Global Public Health

School of Medicine

Department of Economics

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

THE W RLD IS FAT

Page 2: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

• The Thai Choice label: my role

• Ultra-processed food and beverages: their health impact

• Rapid increases in ultra-processed food consumption in Thailand

• Why a warning label is the best approach: evidence of the impact of

a warning label and lack of evidence of major purchase or

reformulation impact from Choices.

Outline

Page 3: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

• 6 visits to Thailand or regional meetings

• Dr Kraisid, Dr Visith in the lead with many others from Mahidol with the Dr.

Tipvon Parinyasiri, Director, Bureau of Food, Food and Drug Administration

• Many small worships, conferences, separate meetings I attended.

• Subsequently I felt there was inadequate impact on purchases and reformulation

from Choices and new research on ultra-processed food plus all we know about the

adverse effects of added sugar, sodium and unhealthy saturated fats led me to shift

my focus.

• The impact of warning labels added to this shift toward warning labels as the most

impactful effort for reducing the risk of overweight/obesity, hypertension and diabetes and other NCD’s.

Choices Thailand

Page 4: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

• Major new research over the past decade has shifted

attention globally to this set of foods and beverages.

• NIH major research team’s clinical trial

• Dozens of important longitudinal cohort studies

• Large impact on all key NCDs—bigger than any nutrient

alone

Major global focus:

Reduce drastically consumption

of ultra-processed foods

Page 5: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Ultra-processed foods, US National Institutes Of Health RCT:

Unprocessed or minimally

processed foods include

fresh, dried, or frozen

vegetables, grains, legumes,

fruits, meats, fish, eggs, and

milk. They are the basis of

healthy dishes and meals.

Sophisticated randomized controlled trial, compared a less-

processed/“real” food diet with ultra-processed diet. This shows

that the current diet trends in Thailand must be turned around.

Hall, K. D.et al (2019 ). "Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain:

A one-month inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake." Cell Metabolism 30: 1-10.

Page 6: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Ultra-processed foods (UPF) typically have many additives

that enhance our desire to eat more of them (e.g., high in added

sugar, added saturated fats, added salt, added smells and

flavors).

Ultra-processed foods are designed to create products that are:

• Highly profitable (i.e., low-cost ingredients, long shelf-life,

emphatic branding),

• Convenient (ready-to-consume, ready-to-heat), and

• Hyper-palatable products.

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs)

Ultra-processed foods include

fast food, sugary drinks,

snacks, chips, candies,

cookies, sweetened milk

products, sweetened cereals,

and sauce and dressings.

They are nutritionally poor.

Page 7: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

• Each person was his/her own control (crossover).

• +500 kcal per day with UPFs– comprised mainly of additional carbohydrates and saturated fats

– Similar protein with both diets

– Major shift was UPF food which is very energy dense.

• In 2 weeks, +0.9 kg body weight with UPFs

• -0.9 kg body weight with unprocessed diet

• In just 2 weeks on UPF diet, increases in selected

biomarkers of some noncommunicable diseases.

U.S. National Institutes of Health: Results

This study points out two mechanisms: hyper palatability

and higher energy density

Hall, K. D.et al (2019 ). "Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain:

A one-month inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake." Cell Metabolism 30: 1-10.

Page 8: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

• Eminent Medical and Nutrition Journals:

Total of > 38 studies with US, European, Latin American

and Asian cohorts show the same issue of large,

significant, increasing risk of many more noncommunicable

disease biomarkers (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, other

measures of heart disease and cancer) and obesity and

mortality (total mortality, also coronary heart disease and

cancer mortality)

Results from additional major publications were only

suggestive before this sophisticated clinical trial

Page 9: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

From simple techniques of preservation to milling of rice and

other grains to the commercial creation of simple processed

products like noodles to the most impactful in a negative

health sense packaged Ramen instant noodle dishes (e.g.

Yum Yum, Mama,etc).

This has been a long slow transition. But the latest phase is

the least healthy with the emergence of all these highly

processed foods and beverages that are ultra-processed

and equally unhealthy street food and fast food.

The are often described as foodlike as they contain so many

chemicals found inside complex ingredients along

with the excessive added sugar, sodium and unhealthy

saturated fats. The grains are normally highly refined.

2. The food processing transition and Thai

trends

Page 10: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Source: Euromonitor

International Limited 2020

© All rights reservedInstant noodle sales

21.6

24.4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Energy (kcal/capita/day)

290

320

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Salt (mg/capita/day)

0.38

0.43

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Saturated Fat (g/capita/day)

7.7

11.0

9.3

10.1

7.1

6.6

4.4

5.5

0.30.8

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Total Sales, 2006-2019 (g/capita/day)

Vietnam

Indonesia

China

Thailand

India

Nutrients sold from instant noodles in Thailand, 2009-2019:

Page 11: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Source: Euromonitor International Limited 2020 © All rights reserved

Trends in packaged junk food sales by category, 2006-2019

Confectionery includes chocolate and sugar confectioneries and gum;

Savory Snacks includes nuts, seeds, trail mixes, salty snacks (eg, chips),

savory biscuits, popcorn, pretzels, and other savory snacks;

Sweet Snacks includes fruit snacks, snack bars, sweet biscuits, chilled snacks (Turkey only), chilled

& shelf-stable desserts (Turkey only), frozen desserts (China and Myanmar only), and ice cream

Note: Euromonitor trends are

close to the actual trends but

show significant underestimates

of total junk foods. Important for

interpreting these slides

Page 12: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Source: Euromonitor International Limited 2020 © All rights reserved

Thailand: Trends in selected Ultra-processed food sales by

category, 2006-2019

Page 13: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Source: Euromonitor International Limited 2020 © All rights reserved

Thailand: Trends in SSB sales by category, 2006-2019

Page 14: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Chilean regulation of UPFs

saturated fats

sugarsenergy

Limits only apply to foods/beverages that

have added sugars, added saturated fats, or

added sodium and then high energy density

June 2016

June 2018

June 2019

SOLID FOODSEnergy kcal/100g 350 300 275

Sodium mg/100g 800 500 400Total sugars g/100g 22.5 15 10

Saturated fats g/100g 6 5 4LIQUIDSEnergy kcal/100mL 100 80 70Sodium mg/100mL 100 100 100Total sugars g/100mL 6 5 5

Saturated fats g/100mL 3 3 3

Phase 1 to 3 with

tougher cutoffs

Page 15: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Overall Context of Chile Studies

Examples of cereal boxes with and without their mascots. NY Times

Page 16: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Labeling Unhealthy Foods

10% of front surface of the package

One for each high “critical nutrient”(sugar, saturated fat, sodium, or calories)

Page 17: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Focus groups

Purpose: to explore how mothers perceive the food environment

before and after the law and to investigate their understanding,

attitudes, discourses, buying decisions and eating behaviors

after introduction of the food regulation (including warning labels).

Correa et al. 2019. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

• Nine focus groups of 7-10 mothers

of children aged 2 to 14 (84 in total)

• All mothers from low and lower income

background

• July 2017 Santiago, Chile [1 year of phase 1]

Page 18: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Changes in social norms

Mother of a 9-year-old child explained:

“My son eats at school. He, by his own,

started to decide what he can eat and

what not, this is because of these

black logos that are in the package.”

Because of this new law, my daughter has been taught a lot about

these black logos. ‘No mom, you can’t buy me that, my teacher

won’t accept it because it has those labels.’ And she requests me

salads, she doesn’t accept snacks that have black labels.

— Gina, who has a 5-year-old daughter

Correa et al. 2019. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Page 19: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Breakfast

cereals

p75

29 → 22

SUGARS

0

20

40

60%

Sweet baked

0

20

40

60

80

100%

*

* *

PHASE 1 REFORMULATION

Reyes, et al, (2020). "Changes in the amount of nutrient of packaged foods and beverages after the initial implementation of the Chilean Law of Food

Labelling and Advertising: A nonexperimental prospective study." PLoS medicine 17(7): e1003220.

Page 20: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Cheese Sausages

p75

842 → 718

p50

929 → 786

p25

800 → 730

p75

1110 → 956

SODIUM

0

20

40%

0

20

40

60

80%

*

*

*

*

* *

Reyes, et al, (2020). "Changes in the amount of nutrient of packaged foods and beverages after the initial implementation of the Chilean Law of Food

Labelling and Advertising: A nonexperimental prospective study." PLoS medicine 17(7): e1003220.

Page 21: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Summary for food groups with large reformulation:

15 to 30% reductions in sugar, saturated fat, or salt content(thousands reformulated to remove warning labels: Reyes et al, Plos Med)

Reyes, et al, (2020 PLoS

medicine 17(7): e1003220.

Page 22: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

• GDAs, Choices logo, Multiple Traffic Lights, and Nutriscore have not been found

to impact ultra-processed food purchases that continue to increase rapidly

globally

– 28 randomized controlled studies and no national food purchase studies

show any of these reduce food purchases of unhealthy foods.

• Tobacco research on a global level showed only warning labels worked to reduce

smoking. Highway safety campaigns showed the same.

• Already Israel, Peru, Mexico, Brazil and Uruguay have adopted the Chilean system. 3-4

others plan to adopt in 2021 (other Asian countries considering; UK public comments;

Canada close)

• As a public health scholar who initially thought positive logos were best,

the large number of randomized controlled trials and the Chilean results

convinced me warning labels are the way forward to reduce obesity,

hypertension, diabetes and many nutrition-related noncommunicable

diseases. The global research on ultra-processed foods gives

the strong health rationale.

Warning labels are the only approach with

significant food and beverage purchase and

reformulation positive impact

Page 23: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Key Findings from Phase 1: sugar in beverages

An evaluation of Chile’s Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on sugar-

sweetened beverage purchases: a before and after studyPLOS Medicine, 11 February 2020

• At the year this law began Chile was the highest per capita

consumer of SSB’s globally.

• The household volume of high sweetened beverages purchased

after the implementation of the policy package fell by 23.7% (-22.8

mL per person per day) versus the pre-regulation trend.

• The largest reduction in household purchases was among high

sweetened fruit (-42%) and dairy (-20%) beverages.

• The volume of non-high sweetened beverages increased by 4.8%.

• Reductions in the volume of high sweetened beverage purchases

following Chile’s Food Labeling and Advertising Law was

considerably larger than previously estimated changes in high

sweetened beverage purchases after the country’s 5% SSB tax.

Page 24: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Taillie L, Reyes M, Colchero A, Popkin B, Corvalán C. An evaluation of Chile’s front-of-package warning label, marketing,

and school sales policies on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases: an observational study Plos Med Feb 11,2020

-23.7-21.5

-19.5

-30.3%

-40%

-35%

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

Overall < High schoolCompleted high

school College or further

Rela

tive c

hange in p

urc

hase v

olu

me

-22.8

ml/capita/day

-27.2

ml/capita/day

-20.9

ml/capita/day

-27.7

ml/capita/day

* Purchase data provided by Kantar WorldPanel Chile.

** Estimates derived from fixed effects models comparing observed post-tax volume of

purchases to counterfactual post-tax volume of purchases based on pre-tax trends.

Figure 1. Relative and absolute changes in purchases* of

regulated beverages, by education level of household head**

Page 25: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

Individuals, communities, the food sector of industry,

policymakers, regulatory agencies all have roles to play but to

date little evidence the food industry will without legal changes.

Eff

ec

tive

ne

ss p

ote

nti

al (p

op

ula

tio

n le

ve

l)

Spectrum of approaches for changing behaviorsGov’t led

Indiv driven

Fiscal

Measures

(e.g.,

taxes,

subsidies) Marketing/

advertising

controls/FOPL

Industry’s

voluntary

efforts

Food service &

other regulations

Modify

choice

architecture

Cultural/ societal

norms for healthy eating

Labeling &

claims regs;

Menu,

Package

Behaviors (measureable) as

proxies for norms

(non-measurable)

Social marketing/

nutrition education

Ultimate goal: Use multiple approaches to

change BOTH supply and demand?

Slide derived from Shu Wen Ng

Page 26: Using front-of-the-package warning labels to remove foods

The struggle over the millennia to

eliminate arduous effort could not

foresee modern technology