user engagement and collaboration: challenges and tools sarah king-hele esds government, university...

46
User Engagement and Collaboration: Challenges and Tools Sarah King-Hele ESDS Government, University of Manchester IASSIST Conference, Vancouver, 3 June 2011

Upload: anastasia-russell

Post on 03-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

User Engagement and Collaboration: Challenges and Tools

Sarah King-HeleESDS Government, University of Manchester

IASSIST Conference, Vancouver, 3 June 2011

The context

• Comparison of approaches to user engagement and collaboration by:– ESDS Government– And MethodBox

• Two services:• separate teams both based at the University of Manchester (but have

shared some investigators)• both offer UK social sciences survey data to download• data available via registration with ESDS• Aimed at academics and other researchers• Aim to help users to understand and use the data correctly

ESDS Government

• Economic and Social Data Service– Social Science data in UK

• ESDS Government– UK Government survey data– Users must be registered– Our data:

• Micro-data• Large-scale repeated cross-sectional surveys• National: England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Great

Britain or the United Kingdom

MethodBox (MB)

A website• End result of a project to bring together obesity researchers• Users must be registered with ESDS• Supplies UK social sciences data to download:

– Only the General Household Survey and Health Survey for England at the moment

– But hope to extend to more data sets• Prototype: Currently invite onlyWebsite: http://www.methodbox.org/

Two approaches to user engagement and collaboration

‘Real world’ approach ‘A virtual research environment’

ESDS

Users: social science researchers

Need: informed substantively and methodologically

MethodBox

Users: Not necessarily academics

Need: to get and use data without ploughing through guides

ESDS Government: ‘Real world’ solutions

Data and documentation - as supplied by data providers

Materials and events - to help users to navigate data and documentation supplied

Introduction to Government Data on Housing and the Local Environment

ESDS Government, 24 May 2011

- Key UK Government data sets on theme

- Talk about English Housing Survey: Dept for Communities and Local Government

- Hands-on with data using SPSS

General Lifestyle Survey user meeting 23 March 2011

• Data suppliers talk about data• Opportunity for direct reply to a

user consultation: – ONS presentation followed by

discussion– ONS propose: end GLF– Place questions in other

surveys• Research presentations

HelpdeskData for teaching

Guides: themes and methods

Conferences

ESDS user collaboration

• Share user lists• Share publications lists• Give attendees a list of participants at events• Provide forums for research presentations• Organize events where users meet others with similar

interests

Data and documentation - manipulated to allow multiple ways of exploring and downloading

Allows users-to access data-to share data and knowledge-to network

MB creates a virtual space for researchers

Users decide how they want to explore the data

Download from multiple data sets

View variable properties

Download just the variables wanted

Upload and share scripts e.g. syntax or do-files

Users can upload and share surveys and data extracts

User collaboration: Sharing data and scripts

Users can create a profile

- Use social features • Messaging• Notes• Comments• Favourite

- Find experts in your area

…linked to their methods and data

A network of researchers

Controlling sharing

To upload data or scripts:• Requires the answer to a series of questions e.g. who produced the data

etc. • MethodBox know who uploaded data/scripts via registration• In a service context, data would only be allowed online after checking

To download: • Only those registered to use that data can actually download data from

MethodBox

Pros and cons of the two approaches

ESDS Government

Pros:We know what we are talking about!We make an effort to be accurate and

professional

Cons:We cannot be experts on everythingLimited manpower and time

MethodBox

Pros:Potential access to experts in a wide

range of fields, data and methodsUnlimited potential manpower and

timeCons:Users may not know what they are

talking about!

‘Wisdom of the experts’ESDS decide what is important

‘Wisdom of the crowds’MethodBox allows users to decide what is important

Behind the scenes...

A lot of work behind the scenes in both models: but the emphasis is different:

ESDS Government: preparation of the guides, organising user meetings, workshops, answering the helpdesk etc.

MethodBox: preparation of the website and data and document access

Working together

Do they work together? – and should they work together?

• Currently operate separately• But interact and discuss future collaboration• Where relevant share knowledge and people• Future: interesting to aim for a service that combined both approaches

Contacts and further information

ESDS GovernmentWebsite(s): https://www.esds.ac.uk/government/Contact: [email protected] team: Angela Dale, Vanessa Higgins, Jo Wathan, Sam Smith, Sarah King-Hele, Pierre Walthery

MethodBox Website: https://www.methodbox.org/Contact: [email protected] team: Iain Buchan, Angela Dale, Carole Goble, Shoaib Sufi, Dexter Canoy, Sarah Thew, Ian Dunlop, Urara Hiroeh, ChristianBrenninkmeijer, Robert Haines, John Ainsworth, Sean Bechhofer,Georgina Moulton

Summary: Two models

ESDSReal world approach“top down”Intermediary between data and usersData – as it isBuilt on top of data as it already isHelp users to understand data and

documents with expert materials and events

Encourages collaboration: face-to-face events: research talks, breaks, share research uses

MBVirtual environment approach“everyone is equal”Interactive Data – changing structures: data stripped

and put together differently Allows users to see what is available and

interact “playpen”Encourages collaboration: social

networking and sharing of data and scripts

Online Events Email/ telephone

Print/ Other

User engagement

Data access and exploration using Nesstar

User meetings Helpdesk Newsletter

Guides: themed and data use

Workshops ESDS news

Twitter

Data sets for teaching

Conferences

User consultations

Collaboration

User meetings/ workshops/ conferences

ESDS Government: tools

How ESDS and MethodBox fit in

UK Data Archive(UKDA)

MethodBox

Economic and Social Data Service(ESDS)

Survey Curation

Survey Access &Mapping

diagram not to scale

Navigating and Sharing Methods and Surveys

Survey Commissioning & Collection

etc…

Impr

ovin

g Ac

cess

& U

se

ESDS: ‘Local college model’

• ESDS provides ‘real world’ solutions: like workshops and guides

• Act as the intermediary between data and user

• Approach: accept the data and documents as they are provided by the supplier

• To help people navigate the data and user guides– Produce guides and tools to find data provided– Provide opportunities for people to share research formally in user

meetings and to meet informally during coffee breaks at events.

Look at the programme to see if anyone else is talking about anything

related

• And look at the other talks in my session

MethodBox ‘Wikipedia model’

• Creates a virtual world• Interactive, takes the data and documentation

and manipulates how it is presented – like a ‘playpen’

• Users decide how they want explore it??• Breaks down and recreates the data and docs

US websites

• Don’t do a slide• But look them up so you know what they

are/do• Prepare to comment on how they are the

same or different

US similar to MB

• Look up ICPSR – the UKDA equivalent to see how similar MB is.

MB

• Not so much helping people to get the data but…

• Aim to get to what the data mean

Their aims

• Both ESDS and MB help people to get the data • but in addition they aim to help users to get to

what the data mean

ESDS: ‘Local college model’• ESDS provides ‘real world’ solutions: like workshops and guides• Act as the intermediary between data and user• Approach: accept the data and documents as they are provided by

the supplier

Materials and events - to help users to navigate data and

documentation supplied

Data and documentation - as supplied by data providers

MethodBox ‘Wikipedia model’

Data and documentation - manipulated to allow multiple

ways of exploring and downloading

Virtual space - to allow users to access parts of the data and to share data and knowledge

• MethodBox creates a virtual research space• Interactive, takes the data and documentation and manipulates how it is presented – like a ‘playpen’• Users decide how they want explore it• Breaks down and recreates the data and docs

Enabling access to data and docs – by helping them with guides etc• Guides to

– Themes: e.g. Health, crime data, housing and the local environment data

– Survey methods: e.g. Small area estimation, weighting surveys

• Data for teaching– e.g. British Crime Survey teaching

data set 2007/08: • real data • smaller number

of variables • added scalar variables to help with teaching statistics

Meeting at events• User meetings:– User presentations of their

work

• Workshops about using survey data– Themes: Health, Crime,

Housing– Methods: Small area

estimation

• Conferences– Theme-based– Aimed at non-academic

users – e.g. Government users

User consultations

Call by data supplier for users to give opinion about proposed changes to data

ESDS Govt link directly the opinions of data users with data providers

e.g. on the future of the GHS/GLF with the Office for National Statistics. GHS user meeting: presentation from ONS and discussion session

Pros and cons of the two approaches

• ESDS: top down approach• MB: everyone is equal approach

MB enables access to data and docs – in a different way

Download and search survey data

Easily view variable information

Easily create and download subsets of

data

Why did two different approaches develop?

• ESDS started with users who are social science researchers. They need to be informed substantively and methodologically for their research. So we provide guides and courses to teach them and allow them to meet up with other people directly through our events.

• MethodBox started from thinking about how the data are used, often by people who don’t want to be academics. They often don’t want to plow through guides to get the information they want . They just want the statistics and to learn from each other. MethodBox provides an environment for this.

ESDS user engagement and collaboration:

‘Real world’ solutions

- we receive the data and documents as they are provided by the supplier and add extra materials and events to help users to understand and engage with the data

Materials and events - to help users to navigate data and

documentation supplied

Data and documentation - as supplied by data providers

Why did two different approaches develop?

ESDSUsers: social science researchersNeed: informed substantively and methodologically

MBUsers: Not neccesarily academicsNeed: to get and use data without plowing through guides

Access to data

Not public data– reflect promises given by data suppliers to the respondents – anyone can browse either website to look at documentation and at

univariate analysis

Two-tier access• General access (“End User Licence”)

– Most data– available to ESDS-registered users (for MB as well!)– Free to UK not for profit

• Special Licence access– Contains extra, potentially disclosive variables– Available after application for special (“Approved”) researcher status

and on explaining why SL data are needed

MB creates a virtual space for researchers

Data and documentation - manipulated to allow multiple

ways of exploring and downloading

Virtual space - to allow users to

access parts of the data and to share

data and knowledge

MethodBox creates a virtual research space -Interactive, breaks down and recreates the data and documents and manipulates how they are presented - like a ‘playpen’ -Users decide how they want explore it

Pros and cons of the two approaches

MB ‘Wisdom of the crowds’ Pros:Potential access to experts in a wide range of fields, data and

methodsUnlimited potential manpower and time

Cons:Users may not know what they are talking about!

Why did two different approaches develop?

ESDSUsers: social science researchersNeed: informed substantively and methodologically

MBUsers: Not neccesarily academicsNeed: to get and use data without plowing through guides

Why did two different approaches develop?

• ESDS started with users who are social science researchers. They need to be informed substantively and methodologically for their research. So we provide guides and courses to teach them and allow them to meet up with other people directly through our events.

• MethodBox started from thinking about how the data are used, often by people who don’t want to be academics. They often don’t want to plow through guides to get the information they want . They just want the statistics and to learn from each other. MethodBox provides an environment for this.