useit study update michael russell, damian bebell, laura o’dwyer, david reider, helena miranda,...

78
USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann, Jen Fontana and Lizzie O’Brien

Upload: cameron-bradford

Post on 28-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

USEIT Study Update

Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor,

Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann, Jen Fontana and Lizzie O’Brien

Page 2: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Technology: Then and Now

Page 3: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

1907

Page 4: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

2002

Page 5: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Computers in K-5 Classrooms Today

Page 6: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Typewriters in K-3 Classrooms in 1930

Page 7: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Use, Support and Effect of Instructional Technology (USEIT) Study

• What are students and teachers doing with technology?

• How do these uses vary across settings?

• What factors contribute to this variation?

• What effects do these uses have on teaching and learning?

Page 8: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

USEIT Study

• 3+ Year Study

• 22 Massachusetts Districts

• Surveys– 112 District Leaders, 120 Principals,

4,000 teachers, 13,300 studentsLinked to each other

• Site Visits and 400+ Interviews

• Case Studies

Page 9: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Sample

4 Small Urban

5 Rural

13 Suburban

Page 10: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Vision

Resources

Curriculum &Instructional Model

Policies and Standards

Leadership

Physical Infra.Support/Personnel

Prof. Development.

CommunityD

istr

ict L

evel

Teacher Beliefs Teacher Preparedness

Home Resource

EducationResources

StudentsCla

ss

School Leadership Principal. Beliefs

Principal. PreparednessSchool CultureSch

ool

Use

Page 11: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Vision

Resources

Curriculum &Instructional Model

Policies and Standards

Leadership

Physical Infra.Support/Personnel

Prof. Development.

CommunityD

istr

ict L

evel

Teacher Beliefs Teacher Preparedness

Home Resource

EducationResources

StudentsCla

ss

School Leadership Principal. Beliefs

Principal. PreparednessSchool CultureSch

ool

Use

Page 12: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

How We Defined Technology

• Computer-based

• Hardware

• Software

• Peripherals– PDA, AlphaSmarts, LCD Projectors, Digital

Cameras, Scanners, Probes

• Internet, Networks, and e-Mail

• Not Graphing Calculators

Page 13: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

USEIT Study Implications for Leadership

• Students: Access and Use

• Teachers and Technology Use

• District Programs

Page 14: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Use Computers at Home

How much time do you spend using a computer at home?

Page 15: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Use the Internet at HomeFor Fun and School

For Fun

For School

Page 16: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Write with Computers

How often do you use your home computer to write papers for school?

Page 17: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Never

Couple oftimes a year

Once everycouple of

weeks

At least everyweek

Students Use Computers in School, But less than at Home

Grade 5

Page 18: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Use Computers Most Often in Science

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Math

Social Studies

English

Science

Never

Couple of timesa year

Once everycouple of weeks

At least everyweek

Grade 8

Page 19: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

English

Social Studies

Science

Math

Never

Couple of timesa year

Once everycouple of weeks

At least everyweek

Students Use Computers Most Often in English

Grade 11

Page 20: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

5th Graders Use Computers in School More than 8th and 11th Graders

0

10

20

30

40

50

Grade 5 (N = 5,111)

Grade 8 (N = 4,695)

Grade 11 (N = 3,205)

24.5% 39.6% 33.4% 2.2% 0.2%

43.6% 29.9% 24.4% 1.7% 0.4%

41.2% 30.8% 21.7% 5.4% 0.9%

None 15 minutesor less

15–60 minutes An hour or two Over two hours

Page 21: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teachers Use Computers During Instruction Less than Students

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Teachers UseWhen Teaching

Student Use inClass

Every Week

Once Every Couple Weeks

Couple Times/Year

Never

Every Week

Once Every Couple Weeks

Couple Times/Year

Never

Page 22: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

What Explains the Differences?

AccessibilityOwnership

Commitment

Page 23: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

The Special Case of Laptop Classrooms

Page 24: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Research Question:

• What happens when the student to computer ratio is increased to 1:1 in upper elementary classrooms?

• 4 classrooms given full student access to laptop computers

• “Status quo” is a rotating cart of laptop computers

Page 25: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Participants

3 classrooms

2 classrooms

Shared Laptops

2 classrooms

2 classrooms

1:1 Laptops

5th grade4th grade

9 Elementary classrooms

Page 26: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Data Collection

• Student Surveys (n=209)• Student Drawings(n=209)

– Think about the work you do in your classroom. In the space below, draw a picture of yourself writing in school.

• Teacher Surveys• Teacher Interviews• Next Fall: Look at relationship with student

achievement via 2003 MCAS

Page 27: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Use of Technology at School

1 2 3 4 5

Andover 1:1

Andover Shared

District 20

District 21

District 19

District 18

District 17

District 16

District 15

District 14

District 13

District 12

District 11

District 10

District 9

District 8

District 7

District 6

District 5

District 4

District 3

District 2

District 1

USEIT Districts: Mean 5th gradeTechnology use in schools

2 =15 min or less 3 =15-60 min 4 =1-2 hrs 5= 2+ hrs

Quick comparison between Laptop Classrooms and

Page 28: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Use of Technology in School - Students

1= Never 2=Once a month 3=Once a week 4=Every day

1 2 3 4

SocialStudies/History

Reading/LanguageArts

Science

MathSharedLaptop

1:1Laptop

Page 29: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Use of Technology in School

1 2 3 4

find information on the Internet

edit papers

write 1st drafts of papers

create a Powerpoint orHyperstudio presentation

work with spreadsheets

send and receive email SharedLaptop

1:1 Laptop

1= Never 2=Once a month 3=Once a week 4=Every day

Page 30: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teacher’s Use of Technology

1 2 3 4

Reading/LanguageArts

SocialStudies/History

Math

Science

SharedLaptop

1:1 Laptop

1= Never 2=Once a month 3=Once a week 4=Every day

Page 31: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Students Home Use of Technology

• Robust access (connectivity) and use

• Difference in types of home use

2 3 4 5

play games

search the 'net for school

search the 'net for fun

write papers for school

email

chat/instant message

MP3s/music

SharedLaptop

1:1 Laptop

2=Almost Never 5=Every day

Page 32: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teachers and Technology

Page 33: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teacher’s VALUE Older Technologies

ValuableValuable

Desktop teachers can access in their classroomInternet access in classroom1 classroom printerTV monitor with VCR1 desktop for each student in a labOverhead projectorTelephone with outside line classroom4 desktops in your classroomLCD projector/computer projector in classroomLaptop for teacher useDigital camera in classroom4 wireless laptops in classroomMultiple classroom printers1 wireless laptop per student in classroomA PalmPilot for teacherA Portable writing device for each studentA Palm Pilot for each student

Not very valuableNot very valuable

Page 34: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

aaaa

One classroom printer

Internet access in your classroom

A desktop computer the teachers can access in their classrooms

A laptop for teacher use

Four desktop computers in your classroom

One desktop computer for each student in a lab

A telephone with an outside line in your classroom

An overhead projector

A TV monitor with a VCR

Four wireless laptops in your classroom

An LCD projector/computer projection system in your classroom

A digital camera in your classroom

One wireless laptop for each student in your classroom

Multiple classroom printers

A PalmPilot for teacher use

A portable writing device for each student

A Palm Pilot for each student

notvaluablenotvaluable

veryvaluable

somewhatvaluable

veryvaluable

somewhatvaluable

Mean (have technology)Mean (do not have technology)

Values Shift with Experience

Page 35: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Access Is Major Obstacle

Major ObstacleMajor ObstacleNot an ObstacleNot an Obstacle

lack of computers in the classroomnot having enough computers for all of your studentslack of practiceamount of course materialdifficulty in accessing computers in labs and/or libraryunpredictable computersinsufficient softwareinsufficient supportoutdated computers/swhaving too many students in your classteachers' lack of inputlack of student's keyboarding skillsunavailability of softwaredifficulties connecting/school tech specialistlack of leadership related to techslow internetlack of students' skills/computernot sure/tech relevantnot knowing how the district/tech usewide variety of computer skills/studentsincreased speed/impr. techdifferences between the computers/home/schoolwide variety of academic skills/studentslack of flexibility in deciding how to you use computer

Page 36: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teachers Have Students Use Computers in Variety of Ways

Work individually on school work using computers

Do project/paper using a computer outside of class

Research/work using the internet or CD-ROM

Work in groups/using computers

Use computer or portable writing device for writing

Use computer to play educational games

Use computer to play games for fun

Use computer to solve problems

Learn keyboarding skills

Present information to the class/ using a computer

Use spreadsheet/db to record, explore or analyze data

Use email to consult experts

Use computer to communicate with students in other schools

Use probes attached to computers

Severaltimes amonth

Severaltimes a

year

Once ortwice a

year

Never Severaltimes amonth

Severaltimes a

year

Once ortwice a

year

Never

Page 37: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teachers Use Computers for a Variety of Purposes

Severaltimes amonth

Severaltimes aweek

Severaltimes aweek

Severaltimes a

year

Once ortwice a

year

Never Severaltimes amonth

Severaltimes a

year

Once ortwice a

year

Never

Make handouts for students using a computer

Create a test, quiz or assignment using a computer

Email teachers in your school

Perform research and lesson planning using the internet

Email communication with school and district administration

Email students' parents

Adapt activity to students' individual needs using a computer

Record student grades using a computer

Use a computer to deliver instruction to your class

Create web-quests or build the internet into a lesson

Prepare or maintain IEPs using a computer

Create and maintain web pages

Page 38: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

1. Delivering Instruction

2. Teacher-directed Student Use

3. Teacher-directed Student Technology Product

4. Preparing for Instruction

5. Communicating via E-mail

6. Recording Grades

7. Accommodating Lessons

What Do We Mean by Technology Use?

Page 39: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Relative teacher technology use

aa

NeverNever Once ortwice a

year

Once ortwice a

year

Severaltimes amonth

Severaltimes amonth

Severaltimes a

year

Severaltimes a

year

Severaltimes aweek

Severaltimes aweek

Communicating via Email

Preparation for Instruction

Directed Student Use

Recording Grades

Delivering Instruction

Accommodating Lessons

Teacher-directed Student Technology Products

Page 40: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Correlation of Technology Uses

Accommodation Use

Email Use

Instructional Use

Preparation Use

Student Use

Student Product

Grading

1.001.00

1.00

0.44

1.00

1.00

0.46 1.00

1.00

Accom- Email Instruc- Prepa- Student Student Gradingmodation Use tional ration Use Product Use Use Use

Page 41: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Correlation of Technology Uses

Accommodation Use

Email Use

Instructional Use

Preparation Use

Student Use

Student Product

Grading

1.00

0.36

1.00

0.36

1.00

0.44

0.34

1.00

0.33

1.00

0.46 1.00

1.00

Accom- Email Instruc- Prepa- Student Student Gradingmodation Use tional ration Use Product Use Use Use

Page 42: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Correlation of Technology Uses

Accommodation Use

Email Use

Instructional Use

Preparation Use

Student Use

Student Product

Grading

1.00

0.25

0.22

0.29

0.23

0.09

1.00

0.23

0.21

0.17

0.16

1.00

0.25

0.22

1.00

0.29

0.24

1.00

0.04

1.00

0.24 1.00

Accom- Email Instruc- Prepa- Student Student Gradingmodation Use tional ration Use Product Use Use Use

Page 43: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Promoting Teacher Uses

• Be specific about type of use

• Design support and professional development targeted at a Specific Use

• Consider impacts of use separately

Page 44: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Factors Related to Teacher Technology Uses

Page 45: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Vision

Resources

Curriculum &Instructional Model

Policies and Standards

Leadership

Physical Infra.Support/Personnel

Prof. Development.

CommunityD

istr

ict L

evel

Teacher Beliefs Teacher Preparedness

Home Resource

EducationResources

StudentsCla

ss

School Leadership Principal. Beliefs

Principal. PreparednessSchool CultureSch

ool

Use

Page 46: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

•29 Independent variable scales developed through exploratory analysis and the literature•These include measures of:

–School/District Vision–Teacher Pedagogy–Teacher Philosophy–Leadership–School culture–Technology support–Technology access and distribution–Professional Development

+ demographic variables

Factors Influencing Teacher Technology Use

Page 47: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teacher Use of Technology for Delivery

Page 48: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

aaaa

Coefficient p-value

Student Model

negativeeffect

positiveeffectSchool Model

0.0 0.3 0.6-0.3

0.001

0.000

0.278

0.718

0.791

0.613

0.990

0.973

0.628

0.020

0.042

0.000

0.001

0.363

0.517

0.695

0.699

0.008

Teachers report on the availability of techology (school mean)

Teachers report pressure to use technology (school mean)

Teacher perception of superintendent's emphasis on technology(school mean)

Teachers report that access is an obstacle (school mean)

Line item funding for technology

Principal's discretion related to technology decisionsTeachers report that professional development focuses on technology

integration (school mean)Principal's professional use of email with teachers

Socioeconomic status index

Variety of available technology-related professional development

Teachers report that poor professional development is an obstacle(school mean)

Teacher confidence using technology

Teacher believes that computers help students

Access obstructs technology use

Teacher believes in student-centered instruction

Issues with students obstruct technology use

Issues with the quality of technology obstruct use

Problems incorporating technology into the curriculum obstruct use

Teacher Use of Technology for Delivery

Page 49: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teacher-directed Student Use of Technology During Class Time

Page 50: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

aaaa

Coefficient p-value

Student Model

negativeeffect

positiveeffectSchool Model

0.0 0.3 0.6-0.3

Teachers report that professional development focuses ontechnology integration (school mean) 0.000

Teachers report on the availability of techology (school mean) 0.000

Teacher perception of superintendent's emphasis on technology(school mean)

0.000

Socioeconomic status index 0.028

Principal's discretion related to technology decisions 0.901

Amount of restrictive policies for using technology 0.000

Variety of available technology-related professional development 0.009

District leaders discuss technology 0.030

Teacher believes that computers help students 0.000

Access obstructs technology use 0.016

Teacher believes in student-centered instruction 0.042

Teacher confidence using technology 0.161

Issues with students obstruct technology use 0.803

Issues with the quality of technology obstruct use 0.451

Problems incorporating technology into the curriculum obstruct use 0.003

Teacher Direct Students to Use Technology During Classtime

Page 51: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teachers Direct Students toCreate Products Using

Technology

Page 52: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

aaaa

Coefficient p-value

Student Model

negativeeffect

positiveeffectSchool Model

0.0 0.3 0.6-0.3

Teachers report pressure to use technology (school mean) 0.000

Teachers report that professional development focuses ontechnology integration (school mean)

0.003

Teachers report on the availability of techology (school mean) 0.178

Teacher perception of superintendent's emphasis on technology(school mean)

0.293

Evaluations consider technology 0.683

Socioeconomic status index 0.806

Variety of available technology-related professional development 0.689

Amount of restrictive policies for using technology 0.251

Teacher believes that computers help students 0.000

Teacher believes in student-centered instruction 0.000

Access obstructs technology use 0.143

Teacher confidence using technology 0.149

Issues with students obstruct technology use 0.918

Issues with the quality of technology obstruct use 0.890

Problems incorporating technology into the curriculum obstruct use 0.019

Teachers Direct Students to Create Products Using Technology

Page 53: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teachers Use Technology for Preparation

Page 54: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

aaaa

Coefficient p-value

Student Model

negativeeffect

positiveeffectSchool Model

0.0 0.3 0.6-0.3

Teachers report on the availability of techology (school mean) 0.000Teachers report that professional development focuses on

technology integration (school mean) 0.008

Socioeconomic status index 0.417

District leaders discuss technology 0.924Teacher perception of superintendent's emphasis on technology

(school mean)0.931

Variety of available technology-related professional development 0.032

Teachers report that technology quality is an obstacle (school mean) 0.169Teachers report that poor professional development is an obstacle

(school mean) 0.207

Teacher confidence using technology 0.000

Access obstructs technology use 0.010

Teacher believes in student-centered instruction 0.061

Teacher believes that computers help students 0.048

Issues with students obstruct technology use 0.950

Problems incorporating technology into the curriculum obstruct use 0.587

Issues with the quality of technology obstruct use 0.181

Teachers Use Technology for Preparation

Page 55: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Lessons

• There is no single set of factors that affects all four types of teacher use of technology

• This is particularly true at the school level – different school/district policies affect different uses

Page 56: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Newer versus Tenured Teachers

• New Teachers: – grew up with computers– are more comfortable with computers– will use computers more for instruction

• Sample divided into three groups:– 1-5 years– 6-15 years– more than 15 years

Page 57: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Confidence Using Technology and Beliefs About the Impacts of

Technology on Students

aa

Confidence

Positive Impacts

Negative Impacts

lower use

6–15 years 15+ years1– 5 years

higher use

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-0.1-0.2-0.3

Weaker Beliefs

Stronger Beliefs

Page 58: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Pedagogical Beliefs About Teacher-Directed and Student-

Centered Instructional Practices

aa

Teacher-directed

Student-centered

lower use

6–15 years 15+ years1– 5 years

higher use

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3-0.1-0.2-0.3

Weaker Beliefs

Stronger Beliefs

Page 59: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Relative teacher technology use

aa

Preparation

Email Use

Teacher-directedStudent Use

Delivery

lower use

6–15 years 15+ years1– 5 years

higher use

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3-0.1-0.2-0.3

Page 60: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Teacher Preparation Programs Need to Focus on Integration

Direct Support for New Teachers

Page 61: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Site Visit Analyses

Page 62: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

13 Factors Related to Success·Leadership·Vision·Goals·Technology Plan·Funding·Resources·Community·Professional Development·Teacher Support·External Programs·Collaboration·Obstacles (Fewer)·Technology Standards

Page 63: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Resources and Support

Districts with strong technology programs have:• line item funding • a technology plan that includes equipment and

support personnel• school integration specialists• focused and evolving PD • diversified and strategic technology support

Page 64: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Leadership and Vision

Districts with strong district-wide technology leadership have:

• higher levels of community involvement

• district leaders who emphasize technology and who have clear technology visions

• and educational goals that are supported by technology

Page 65: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Correlation between components of District Technology Programs and Student Use in School

Mean student use in 5th grade

Mean student use in 8th grade

Mean student use in 11th grade

Support .382 .458 .373

Leadership .233 .090 .437

Page 66: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Factors Influencing Use

Page 67: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Introduction of Technology

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• Content Area Specific:

Writing Science Mathematics

• Technology Application: Programming Business Skills Word Processing

Page 68: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Early Acquisition

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• Gradual Purchases• Model Classrooms

• Borrowed and donated

Page 69: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Early PD

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• Comfort and knowledge of machine• Content Specific

• Tool-based• Administrative and Communication

Page 70: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Tech Plans

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• Gradual acquisition• Infused Classrooms• Trials/Experiments• Support, dual platform• Teacher/Curriculum Input

• Increase Access• Compatibility• Simplify support and maintenance

Page 71: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Funding

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• Line Item • Operating Budget

• Bonds• External Sources• Building Projects

Page 72: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Tech Director Roles

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• TD on Academic Committees• Focus on Curricular Uses

• Hardware and Connectivity• Technical Support

Page 73: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Vision

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use

• Aligned Vision at District Level • Superintendent Supportive• Emphases differ between Sup., Curric. Director, and TD

Page 74: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Current PD

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use• Individualized• Varied

• Tool-based• Primarily Group Workshop

Page 75: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Community Support

High and Robust Use Low and Variable Use

• Cohesive District Level • Strong School-Level• PTAs Active

Page 76: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Initial Patterns and Observations

• Educational Technology is Complex– Many Types, Beliefs, and Uses– Presentation, Preparation, Record Keeping,

Communication, Tailoring, Student Use– Home versus School– Variation within and across schools– What explains variation --- School and District

Leadership and Programs

Page 77: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

Key Factors Affecting Elementary Classroom Use

• Home Use, Skills, and Beliefs about tech

• Teacher’s Pedagogical beliefs and practices

• Mean Student Technology Skill Level

• Teacher’s Beliefs about Technology

• Principals beliefs about technology

• Principals Emphasis on technology and Pressure to use Technology

Page 78: USEIT Study Update Michael Russell, Damian Bebell, Laura O’Dwyer, David Reider, Helena Miranda, Jen Higgins, Kathleen O’Connor, Amie Goldberg, Tom Hoffmann,

What Leaders Do

• Showcase to community and school board

• Vision and expectations

• Pockets of innovation

• Professional Development - teams and extended time