use of models and monitoring systems in the implementation ... · use of models and monitoring...
TRANSCRIPT
Use of models and monitoring systems in theimplementation of international agreements ofpollution reduction
Global scale agreements of pollution reduction
Regional scale agreements – e.g. the LRTAP convention
Marine environment agreements – e.g. HELCOM and OSPARCOM conventions
N:\adm\arkiv\overhead\2006\CEE\Yale-14.ppt 1
Trends of emissions and depositions in Europe, 1990 - 2001
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Reduction Pb Cd Hg
Emissions 70% 45% 53%
Deposition 63% 35% 35%
0
10
20
30
40
1990 2001
Dep
ositi
on/e
mis
sion
s, t/y Total emissions
Anthropogenic emissionsDeposition
Pb
Changes of emissions and depositions in Europe, 1990 - 2001
Pb
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Luxe
mbo
urg
Nor
way
Mon
aco
Swed
enIc
elan
dFr
ance
Mol
dova
Den
mar
kB
elar
usA
ustr
ia0
1020304050
Dec
reas
e, ti
mes Emissions
Deposition
Irela
ndK
azak
hsta
nA
zerb
aija
nR
ussi
aG
eorg
iaA
lban
iaC
ypru
sR
oman
iaG
reec
eTu
rkey
0
1
2
3
Dec
reas
e, ti
mes Emissions
Deposition
Changes of emissions and depositions in Europe, 1990 - 2001
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Hg
Mac
edon
iaM
oldo
vaA
rmen
iaLa
tvia
Net
herla
nds
Ger
man
yU
krai
neB
ulga
ria UK
Bel
gium
0
10
20
30
Dec
reas
e, ti
mes
Emissions Deposition
Bos
nia&
Her
z.G
reec
eTu
rkey
Cyp
rus
Icel
and
Bel
arus
Spai
nIre
land
Mon
aco
Lith
uani
a0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Dec
reas
e, ti
mes Emissions
Deposition
Transboundary pollution in Europe, 2001
Cd emissions Cd deposition
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
HM depositions from external sources, t/y
Transboundary pollution in Europe, 2001
t / y
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Pb > 50 t/y
Cd > 2 t/y
Hg > 0.5 t/y0
100
200
300
400
Rus
sia
Ukr
aine
Fran
ceG
erm
any
Pola
ndR
oman
iaTu
rkey
Hun
gary
Aus
tria
Bul
garia
Italy
Switz
erla
ndB
elar
us
receptors
Pb
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
HM depositions from external sources, %
Transboundary pollution in Europe, 2001
Pb 60 – 80 %
Cd 30 – 50 %
Hg 30 – 50%020406080
Mon
aco
Bos
nia&
Her
zego
Aus
tria
Luxe
mbo
urg
Alb
ania
Hun
gary
Slov
enia
Rep
. Mol
dova
Mac
edon
iaC
zech
Rep
.Sw
itzer
land
Slov
akia
receptors
Pb
Pola
ndIta
lySp
ain
Rom
ania
Rus
sia
Ger
man
yFr
ance
Turk
eyB
ulga
riaSl
ovak
ia0
5
10
15
20
Sources
Transboundary transport from some countries, t/y
Transboundary pollution in Europe, 2001
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Pb > 100 t/y
Cd > 4 t/y
Hg > 1 t/y
Italy, Russia, Spain, Poland, Germany, Ukraine, Romania
Pb
Spatial distribution
Emission data1990 1991 . . . 2001 2010
2323 t/y 1985 t/y 497 t/y 294 t/y
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Country–oriented information on HM and POP
Germany
Trends of in emissions, air concentrations and depositions in EMEP, 1990-2001
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Germany
Emissions Air concentrations
Deposition flux
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
Germany
Depositions to Germany
Depositions from Germany
Transboundary transport, 2001
MSC-E
Contribution of external sources, %
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Germany, 2001
Comparison of modeling results with measurements
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
Schmucke - DE8
Deuselbach - DE4
Schauinsland - DE3
Brotjacklriegel - DE5
Langenbrugge - DE2
Neuglobsow - DE7Zingst - DE9
Westrland - DE1
Monthly mean concentrations of Pb in air (ng/m3) and in precipitation (µg/l)
Steering Body to EMEP, 8-10 September, 2003
MSC-E
Germany, 2001
Definition of the problem:Definition of the problem:
Studies carried out in various countries in the 1970’s and 1980’s conclude on high contamination of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea by inorganic and organic toxic compounds and nutrients.
This contamination has been found to cause adverse environmental effects.
International cooperation is needed for elaboration and implementation of solutions to reduce contamination of the above mentioned seas.
International cooperation needed to solve International cooperation needed to solve environmental problems in the northern sea environmental problems in the northern sea
regionsregions
Paris Commission (PARCOM): Prevention of pollution of the North Sea from land-based sources: - signed by 1974, - entered into force in 1978, - in 1992 replaced by the Convention for the Marine
Environment of the North-East Atlantic “a 1995 target for 50% reductions of pollution load compared with 1985 levels of various heavy metals (incl. Hg, Pb, Cd) and POPs”.
International cooperation needed International cooperation needed ……..
Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM) - entered into force in 1980, - in 1992 replaced by the Helsinki Convention of the
Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea “a 1995 target for 50% reduction of emissions of certain heavy metals (incl. Hg, Pb, Cd) and POPs”.
Year Region
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Gulf of Bothnia
45 45 45 45 43 42 39 38 37 34 32
Gulf of Finland
22 23 22 22 22 21 19 18 18 16 17
North Baltic Proper
131 131 131 129 124 119 110 106 104 93 110
South Baltic Proper
75 74 74 73 69 66 62 61 60 57 55
Kattegat/Belt Sea
56 56 55 55 53 52 50 50 49 48 47
Total 329 329 327 324 311 300 280 273 268 247 261
Annual depositions of total (oxidized + reduced) nitrogen to the Baltic Seain the period 1986-1996 (in 103 tonnes N)
Pathway Period N, tonnes yr-1 P, tonnes yr-1
Riverine 1980-1993 830 000 41 000
Coastal point sources
1990 100 000 13 000
Atmospheric deposition
1985-1989 300 000 5 500
Major estimated annual inputs of nitrogen and phosphorusto the Baltic Sea
Chemical Gulf of Bothnia
Gulf of Finland
North Baltic Proper
South Baltic Proper
Kattegat/B elt Sea
Catchment area
Baltic Sea
Pb 69.8 53.1 193.8 169.6 79.0 3721.0 565.0
Cd 2.0 4.5 8.6 9.3 4.1 220.0 28.4
Hg 0.5 0.6 0.7 2.3 1.4 43.8 5.5
Lindane 1.3 1.4 4.1 3.1 1.6 82.7 11.5
Total atmospheric deposition of Pb, Cd, Hg and lindometo the Baltic Sea in 1996 (in tonnes)
The final report on implementation of theThe final report on implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration1988 Ministerial Declaration
The report concluded that:“… the overall 50% reduction target has not been achieved for all polluting inputs, despite the efforts of the contracting parties.”
Remaining problems: Eutrophication resulting from high inputs of nutrients from
agriculture, transport and municipalities; Comparatively high concentrations of some heavy metals and
persistent organic pollutants; Illegal discharges from ships.
Lessons learned from the performance of work within Lessons learned from the performance of work within PARCOM (OSPARCOM) and HELCOMPARCOM (OSPARCOM) and HELCOM
1. The 1995 target has not been met completely.
WHY?
Lessons learnedLessons learned
Answer 1:
The 1995 target too ambitious and not fully supported by the substantiation studies on:
Basic features affecting impacts of pollutants on the environment - a gap in dialogue between “natural science” experts and
policy makers
Environmental protection strategies - a gap in dialogue between “engineering science” experts & economists and policy makers
Cost-benefit analysis of the 50% reduction strategies - a gap in dialogue between “social and economic science”
experts and policy makers
Affected ecosystem`s productivity (e.g.photosynthetic activity, nutrient cycling, species diversity), affecting its vulnerability to changes
Synergistic effects, possibilities for dilution
Natural background levels in the environment
Natural adaptions of organisms to external changes
BasicBasic features affecting impactsfeatures affecting impacts on the on the environmentenvironment
Lessons learned Lessons learned ……..
Answer 2:
Gaps in management of air pollutant generation and release, as well as insufficient use of economic instruments in pollution control - a gap in dialogue between policy makers in countries
within the conventions
Lessons learned Lessons learned ……..
Answer 3:
Incomplete implementation of action plan for emission reductions prepared within the conventions
- a gap in dialogue between policy makers and financial institutions within and outside the region
- a gap in dialogue between policy makers in various countries concerning joint financial responsibility for the implementation of the emission strategies. A positive example of ECOFUND in Poland established in 1992.
determination of the role of nutrients and organic and inorganic contaminants in ecosystem degradation,
determination of nutrient and contaminant loads, and establishment of reduction targets,
establishment of monitoring/ observation systems to detect and forecast changes in the Baltic ecosystem and to mitigate the effects of natural and anthropogenic hazards,
elimination of pollution hot spots, and
banning the use of PCBs and DDT
Successes in use of science in sustainable Successes in use of science in sustainable development of the Baltic Sea development of the Baltic Sea
Lessons learned Lessons learned ……..
2. A set of tools has been developed to:
- properly design and test the implementation of environmental strategies for reduction of atmospheric load of pollutants to the marine environment,
- provide substantiation for emission/load reduction strategies.
Lessons learned Lessons learned ……..
3. A large body of information has been collected on sources, pathways, fate, environmental and human health effects, and pollution abatement and its cost for “convention” pollutants in the northern seas regions. This data base can be used to: - prepare “environmental scenarios” for the next
20-30 years,
- elaborate implementation plans to meet the results of these scenarios.
reduction of the use of non-renewable energy and material resources,
increased recycling and reuse of materials,
development of agriculture towards sustainability, and more generally
closure of the economic and social gap between countries in the region
Major challenges in the Baltic Sea RegionMajor challenges in the Baltic Sea Region
the origin, transport pathways, fate, and environmental effects of chemicals in the sea,
the degree of reduction of the chemical load, needed for chemical and biological restoration of the Baltic sea (meeting predefined environmental goals),
the cost-efficient measures to meet these goals, and
the methods for monitoring the implementation of policies defined to meet the environmental goals
Science needed to address the following Science needed to address the following issuesissues