use of force report 2015 external final 041516a · introduction the information presented in this...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MONTGOMERYCOUNTYPOLICEDEPARTMENT
POLICYANDPLANNINGDIVISION
APRIL2016
ANNUALUSEOFFORCEREPORT2015
![Page 2: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TABLEOFCONTENTS
SECTION PAGEChief’sMessage 1Introduction 2Overview 3Analysis 4UseofForcebyDistrict 6ActivityWhenForcewasUsed 8OffensesWhereForcewasUsed 10TypeofForceUsedbyOfficersandDefendants 11InjuriestoOfficersandDefendants 18MedicalTreatmentforOfficersandDefendants 20OfficersAssaulted/Ambushed 23ContributingFactors 24Age‐Race‐EthnicityandGenderofDefendantsandOfficers 26YearsonDepartmentofOfficers 36AllegationsandInvestigations 38In‐CustodyDeaths 38DeadlyForceIncidents 38Summary 40
*4/26/16 - A map showing the locations of ECD use by Police Reporting Area (PRA) has been added to the ECD Use Section on Page 18.
![Page 3: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1
Chief’sMessage:RecenteventsinFerguson,MissouriandBaltimore,MarylandbegananationwidediscussiononPoliceuseof force,especiallytheuseofdeadlyforce.Today,thepublic—allsegmentsofourcommunity—ispaying much closer attention to the actions of their policedepartment.Iamfrequentlyaskedquestionsaboutourpolicies,ourtraining,andhow members of the Department are held accountable for theiractions.While I believewe have a very strong use of force policy,Function Code 131, and stress de‐escalation techniques in ourtraining, the fact remains that police officers occasionally mustengage a person physically either to take them into custody, toprotectthem,ortorestoresafetyandordertoasituation.
Any use of force must always be lawful and objectively reasonable. The objectively reasonablestandard requirespoliceofficers’ actions tobe reasonable in lightof the facts and circumstancespresented to theofficerat the time the forcewasused.Over theyears, theuseof forcebypoliceofficershaschanged,andthepoliciesandtraininghaveimproved.Experiencehastaughtusthatweneededtofocusmoreonnon‐lethaloptionsanddealingeffectivelywithfolkswhoarementallyill.Ibelieve that our Crisis Intervention Training (CIT) has had a profound impact on reducing thenumberofuseofforcecasesinvolvingpeoplewithmentalillness.Every use of force is reviewed by a supervisor and a police Commander. Every excessive forcecomplaint is investigated by the Internal Affairs Division. As you will see in this report, theMontgomeryCountyPoliceusedsomelevelofforceinabout2.5percentofthearrestswemadein2015.Thevastmajority(82percent)ofourusesofforcewereofficersusingonlytheirhands.Thiscouldmeananythingfromgrabbingandguidingapersonwhoispassivelyresisting,toengaginginaviolentstruggle togaincontrolofan individual. Therewasone incidentwhereanofficeruseddeadlyforcewhichresultedinnocivilianfatalities.Theofficerfiredoneshotintoavehiclewhichacceleratedtowardstheofficerafterissuingcommandsforthevehicletostop.Thevehiclestrucktheofficer,butluckilytheofficersustainedonlyminor,non‐lifethreateninginjuries.AsIreviewedthisreport,Iwaspleasedtoseethatnoin‐custodydeathsoccurredin2015,anduseofElectronicControlDevicesdecreasedby6%comparedto2014,and65.5%since2011.Ididnote,however, assaults on officers increased 23% in 2015,with 128 officers sustaining some type ofinjuryduringauseofforceincident.Accountabilityandtransparencyarenecessaryelementstobuildingconfidenceandtrustbetweenpoliceand thecommunityweserve. Thisreportandothers like itareoneofmanywaysweareworkingtobuildandsustainthattrust.Thereisagreatdealofinformationcontainedinthisreport.SomeofitmaypromptotherquestionsfromyouandIencourageyoutocontactmeviae‐mail[[email protected]]andwewillrespondtoyourinquiries.
![Page 4: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2
INTRODUCTIONThe information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reportscompletedbyofficersforincidentsincalendaryear2015wheresometypeofforcewasused.Thisreportisintendedtoprovideanoverviewoftheincidentsinvolvinguseofforcebypoliceofficersandtoalsoidentifytrendsoranytrainingareasthatneedtobeaddressed.Becauseeachreportisreviewed by supervisors and command staff at various levelswithin the department, individualeventsarenotcapturedinthisreport,exceptforthosethatmayinvolveunusualcircumstancesorneedfurtherclarification.Moreover,thereportingandannualanalysisofdepartmentuseofforcepolicies and procedures is required by the Commission on Accreditation for Law EnforcementAgencies (CALEA) to help agencies identify policy modifications, trends, improve training andofficersafety,andprovidetimelyinformationfortheagencytoaddressuseofforceissueswiththecommunityitserves.MontgomeryCountypoliceofficersreceiveextensiveentry‐levelandin‐servicetrainingfocusedonusing only the amount of force necessary to control an incident, affect an arrest, or protectthemselves or others from harm or death as specified in department policy and procedures. Anintegralcomponentofthesetrainingprogramsiscommunication,de‐escalationtechniques,anduseof less lethal options to help safely diffuse situations that may unnecessarily escalate tocircumstancesrequiringofficerstoresorttodeadlyforce.Officersmay only use force which is objectively reasonable to make an arrest; an investigatorystop/detentionorotherseizure;orintheperformanceoftheirlawfulduties,toprotectthemselvesorothersfrompersonalattack,physicalresistance,harm,ordeath.Thedecisiontoexerciseforcemustbebaseduponthecircumstancesthattheofficerreasonablybelievestoexist.Indeterminingtheappropriatelevelofforcetobeusedbyanofficer,thenatureofthethreatorresistancefacedorperceivedbytheofficerascomparedtotheforceemployedshouldbeconsidered.However,officersmust sometimesmakesplit‐seconddecisionsabout theamountof force that isnecessary in a particular situationwith limited information and in circumstances that are tense,uncertain, and rapidly evolving.Nevertheless,when it ispracticable, officers strive to alwaysde‐escalateasituationbeforeresortingtousinganytypeofforce.Theneed to use force,whether deadly ornon‐deadly, isoneofthemost demanding and criticaldecisionsthatalawenforcementofficermustmake.Thedepartmentrespectsthesanctityofeveryhuman life and the application of deadly force is ameasure only employed in themost extremecircumstances. Perdepartmentpolicy, anofficer is required tocompleteaMCP37 ‐UseofForceReport, andanincidentreport,foranincidentthatinvolvesanyofthefollowingcircumstances: Anytime forceisusedtocounteractaphysical struggle
Followingtheuseofanyforcewhichresults inaninjurytoanindividual
Whenanindividualclaimstohavebeeninjuredasaresultofuseofforce
Whenever forceisappliedusingaprotective instrument
Wheneverafirearmisdischargedotherthanauthorizedtargetpractice
![Page 5: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3
Whenever a department canine inflicts injury on any subject or suspect in conjunctionwithasearch,arrest,orattemptedapprehension
Anytimeanofficerisassaultedorambushed
All reports are reviewed to verify compliance with department policy by a patrol supervisor, aDistrictCommander,andtheAssistantChiefsofthePatrolServicesBureau(PSB),theFieldServicesBureau (FSB), or the Investigative ServicesBureau (ISB), depending on the bureau the officer(s)usingforceisassignedto.
TheMontgomeryCountyDepartment of Police remains dedicated to creating a culture of safety,transparency, andaccountability.Thedepartment’suseof force training goesbeyondaddressinguse of force options, levels of resistance, and case law.Most importantly, it emphasizes gainingcompliancethroughunderstandingofpsychologicalfactorsandusingcommunicationskillstode‐escalatesituationswhenpossible,andtominimizetheforceused.Theconceptsofaccountability,professionalism,andintegrityforallofficersarewovenintotheagency’sentiretrainingprogram.
OVERVIEW
Based on a comprehensive review and analysis of the use of force reports submitted by MCPDofficers in 2015, the following are highlights of the results that are detailed in various sectionsthroughoutthisreport:
MCPDofficersreportedatotalof451useofforceincidents.
Forcewasusedbyofficersinlessthanonepercentofthetotalcallsforservice.
Forcewasonlyusedin2.5percentofallarrestsmadebyofficers.
Fourdistrictsexperiencedanincreaseinthenumberofreporteduseofforceincidentsfromthepreviousyear,whiletwodistrictsreportedadecrease.
Making arrests (or attempting tomake arrests), serving emergency evaluation petitions,anddefendingagainstassaultsconstitutedapproximately95percentoftheincidentswheresometypeofforcewasnecessarytobeused.
Officersresponding toreportsofassaultsaccounted foralmost42percentofall reporteduseofforceincidents,whichisasignificantincreasecomparedtothepreviousyear.
Calls for service involving assaults, narcotics/DUI offenses, and disorderly conductaccountedforapproximatelytwo‐thirdsofallreporteduseofforceincidents.
Thetypeofforcemostcommonlyusedbyofficerswashands,whichwasusedin82percentofuseofforceincidents,anditwasalsothemostcommontypeofforceusedagainstofficersbydefendants(78percent).
UseofElectronicControlDevices(ECDs)decreased6percentfromthepreviousyear.
Injuriessustainedbyofficersincreased6percentfromthepreviousyear,whileinjuriestodefendantsincreasedlessthanonepercent(0.8).
![Page 6: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
4
Officers reported being injured in 28 percent of reported use of force incidents, anddefendantswereinjured(orclaimedtobeinjured)in54percentofincidents.
Officersrequiredmedicaltreatmentin42percentofthereporteduseofforceincidents,anddefendantsrequiredtreatmentin47percentofincidents.
In65percentoftheincidentswhereofficersemployedsometypeofforce,thedefendantswerereportedtobeundertheinfluenceofalcoholand/ordrugs.
Thenumberofreportedassaultsonofficersincreasedalmost23percentcomparedtothepreviousyear.
Defendantssufferingfromsomeformofmental illnesswereinvolvedin27percentofthereporteduseof forceincidents,anincreaseofalmost3percentcomparedtothepreviousyear.
87percentofthedefendantsinvolvedinuseofforceincidentswereAfricanAmericanandCaucasian.
Defendants ages 18‐39 accounted for almost 70 percent of the reported use of forceincidents.
Theaverageageofthedefendantsinvolvedinuseofforceincidentswas30,andtheaverageageoftheofficersinvolvedintheseincidentswas33.
78percentofthedefendantsand89percentoftheofficersinvolvedinreporteduseofforceincidentsweremale.22percentofthedefendantsand11percentoftheofficersinvolvedinreporteduseofforceincidentswerefemale.
67 percent of the officers involved in use of force incidents served on the departmentbetweenoneto10years.
There were 12 use of force‐related complaints made against officers compared to 10complaintsthepreviousyear.
Deadly force was only used in one incident, compared to three incidents reported thepreviousyear.
Noin‐custodydeathsoccurred.
ANALYSISThepopulationinMontgomeryCountyin2014,basedonU.S.CensusBureaudata,isestimatedat1,030,447,andthecrimeratepercapitaremainsverylow;5,057crimesforevery100,000people.In 2015,Montgomery County police officerswere dispatched to 209,207 calls for service,made17,682 arrests, and forcewas only used in 451 incidents. This translates to force being used inapproximately0.22percentofthetotalcallsforservice,andonly2.5percentofarrestsituations.
![Page 7: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5
The incidencerateof theuseof forcecomparedto thecalls forserviceandarrestshasremainedrelativelyconsistentsince2012(anaverageof0.21percentofthecallsforserviceandtwopercentofarrests). This data reflects that, for the overwhelming majority of calls for service and arrestsituations,officersarerarelyrequiredtouseforcetosafelyresolveasituation.
Thefollowingchartprovidesadistrictsummaryofcalls forservice,reportedcrimes,arrests,anduseofforceincidentsreportedin2015.
2015SUMMARY
DISTRICT TOTALCALLSFORSERVICE
TOTALCRIMEREPORTED*
TOTALARRESTS TOTALUSEOFFORCEINCIDENTS
1D 32,101 6,568 1,656 22
2D 33,317 7,168 1,813 63
3D 42,635 11,283 4,630 140
4D 41,104 10,224 4,632 95
5D 25,706 6,135 1,911 71
6D 34,344 9,054 3,040 60
TOTAL 209,207 50,432 17,682 451*IncludesPartIandPartIIOffensesreportedinaccordancewiththeUniformCrimeReporting(UCR)Program.
17,682
451
USE OF FORCE INCIDENTS VS.ARRESTS
Arrests Use of Force Incidents
![Page 8: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
6
USEOFFORCEBYDISTRICTAsummaryofthecallsforserviceforeachdistrictbasedonavailabledataforthelastfouryearsispresentedinthetablebelow.
NUMBEROFDISPATCHEDCALLSFORSERVICE*DISTRICT LOCATION 2012 2013 2014 2015
1D Rockville 38,938 34,650 31,710 32,101
2D Bethesda 31,864 34,576 32,777 33,317
3D SilverSpring 43,592 43,048 40,684 42,635
4D Wheaton 40,421 41,662 39,117 41,104
5D Germantown 27,375 26,113 24,287 25,706
6D Gaithersburg 35,823 34,757 33,236 34,344
TOTAL 218,013 214,806 201,811 209,207***Thenumbersreflectedforeachdistrictdonotincludeanimalservices‐relatedcallsforservice**Representsanincreaseofapproximately4%from2014.In 2015, all districts experienced an increase in the number of use of force incidents that werereported compared to 2014, except for 4D and 6Dwhich experienced decreases (14%and 26%respectively)asshowninthechartbelow.
Note:Theuseofforceincidentreportsarebasedonthelocation(district)whereforcewasused,notnecessarilythedistrictthattheofficersareassignedtoorwheretheeventmayhaveoriginated.
020406080
100120140
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
2014 18 40 107 111 61 81
2015 22 63 140 95 71 60
USE OF FORCE INCIDENTS BYDISTRICT OF OCCURRENCE
![Page 9: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7
Thetablebelowisasummaryofuseofforceincidentsbydistrictofoccurrencereportedfrom2011‐2015.
*Thistotaldoesnotincludetheuseofforcereportsfiledin2015byMCPDofficersfor231incidentswhereforcewasusedforanimaldestructions(primarilydeer).A fiveyear summaryof reporteduseof force incidents foreachpolicedistrict isprovided in thechartbelow.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
USE OF FORCE SUMMARY BYDISTRICT OF OCCURRENCE
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
DISTRICT 2011 2012 2013 2014 20151D 39 33 24 18 22
2D 63 55 64 40 63
3D 133 102 139 107 140
4D 122 138 131 111 95
5D 62 36 37 61 71
6D 63 69 86 81 60
TOTAL 482 433 481 418 451*
![Page 10: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
8
The followingchart shows the totalnumberofuseof force incidents reportedcounty‐wide from2011‐2015.
Thisdatashowsthattherehasbeenanaverageof453useofforceincidentsreportedoverthelastfive years, and a 6 percent decrease in the overall number of incidents reported over this sameperiod.
ACTIVITYWHENFORCEWASUSEDIn2015,forcewasusedinapproximately318incidents(71percent)whenofficerswereinvolvedinmaking arrests for various offenses. The next highest reported activity, serving an emergencyevaluationpetition(EEP),accountedfor76incidents(17percent),followedbydefendinganassault,whichaccountedfor33incidents(7percent)wheresomelevelofforcewasnecessarytobeused.Othervariousactivitiessuchas transportingprisoners, servingsearchwarrants,and trafficstopsaccountedfortheremaining24incidents(5percent)reportedin2015.
0
100
200
300
400
500
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Incidents 482 433 481 418 451
USE OF FORCE INCIDENT SUMMARY2011‐ 2015
![Page 11: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
9
Asummaryoftheseactivitiesispresentedinthechartbelow.
Thedatareportedin2015indicatesapproximatelythesameoveralltotals forthesecategoriesasreportedin2014asshownbelow.
In 2015, making or attempting to make an arrest, serving emergency evaluation petitions, anddefending against assaults accounted for 95 percent of the activities where officers needed toemploysometypeofforce,whichissimilartotheexperiencereportedforthesesamecategoriesin2014,andinprioryearsasshowninthechartonthenextpage.
318
76
3324
USE OF FORCE ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Making Arrests
Serving EmergencyEvaluation Petitions
Defending AgainstAssaults
Other
050
100150200250300350
MakingArrests
ServingEmergencyEvaluationPetitions
DefendingAgainstAssaults
Other
USE OF FORCE ACTIVITY SUMMARY2015VS.2014
2015
2014
![Page 12: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
10
OFFENSESWHEREFORCEWASUSEDOfficers responding to reports of assaults accounted for 187 of the total use of force incidentsreported in 2015 (41.5 percent), compared to 137 incidents (33 percent) reported in 2014, anincreaseof36.5percent.Otherleadingoffenseswhereforcewasusedin2015includedencounterswith subjects under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol (54), and disorderly conduct (56) asshowninthefollowingchart.
Assaults,narcotics/DUI‐relatedoffenses, anddisorderly conduct accounted for297 (66percent) ofthetotaluseofforceincidentsreportedin2015.Theremaining154incidents(34percent)involvednumerous other offenses including larceny, burglary, auto theft, vandalism, weapons offenses,trespassing,andothermiscellaneouscallsforservice.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
USE OF FORCE ACTIVITY SUMMARY2011‐ 2015
Making Arrests
Serving EmergencyEvaluation Petitions
Defending AgainstAssaults
0
50
100
150
200
Assaults Narcotics/DUIOffenses
DisorderlyConduct
2014 137 67 56
2015 187 54 56
OFFENSE TYPES2015VS.2014
![Page 13: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
11
The chart below summarizes the offense typeswhere force used byofficerswasmost prevalentfrom2011–2015.
Overthe fiveyearperiodfrom2011‐2015, theneedtouse force insituations involvingassaultsincreased 6 percent,while incidents involving narcotics/DUI offenses decreased 29 percent, andcallsforserviceinvolvingdisorderlyconductwhereforcewasuseddecreased19percent.
TYPEOFFORCEUSEDBYOFFICERSANDDEFENDANTSOfficers
Thetypeofforcemostwidelyusedbyofficersin2015washands,whichwereused414times(82percent),comparedto344timesin2014,anincreaseof20percent.ElectronicControlDeviceswereused 59 times (13 percent of total use of force incidents), which are detailed in the ElectronicControlDevicesSectionofthisreport,comparedto63incidentsin2014,adecreaseof6percent.
OleoresinCapsicum(OC)Spraywasthenextmostcommontypeofforcenotedanditwasusedin15incidents (3percent), compared to27 incidents in2014, adecreaseof44percent.The flashlightwasusedin7incidents(1.4percent)in2015,comparedto14incidentsin2014,adecreaseof50percent.Policecaninesweredeployed in6 incidents (1.2percent), thesamenumberof incidentsreportedin2014.TheASP(expandablebaton)wasusedin3incidents(0.6percent),comparedto5incidentsin2014,adecreaseof40percent.
There was one incident involving the use of deadly force in 2015 (0.2 percent), which issummarized in theDeadly Force Incidents section of this report, compared to three incidentsreportedin2014,a67percentdecrease.
0
50
100
150
200
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Assaults 177 168 188 137 187
Narcotics/DUIOffenses
76 67 89 67 54
Disorderly Conduct 69 53 53 56 56
OFFENSE TYPES2011‐ 2015
![Page 14: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
12
Thechartbelowshowsthebreakdownofthemostcommontypesofforceusedbyofficersin2015.
Note:Insomeinstances,morethanonetypeofuseofforcemaybeusedbymultipleofficersinanattempttoaffectanarrestorcontrolasituation.Duringmanycallsforservice,aprimaryofficerisdispatchedandatleastoneadditionalofficerrespondsasaback‐upunit.Itisimportanttopointoutthatinapproximately72percentofthecircumstanceswhereforcewasappliedin2015,twoormoreofficerswereinvolved.
The chart below summarizes the recurrent types of force used by officers in 2015 compared to2014.
414
3
715
59
61
36
TYPES OF FORCE USED BY OFFICERS
Hands
ASP Baton
Flashlight
OC Spray
ECD
Canine
Handgun
Other
0
100
200
300
400
500
TYPES OF FORCE USED BY OFFICERS2015VS.2014
2015
2014
![Page 15: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
13
Thechartbelowsummarizestherecurrenttypesofforceusedbyofficersfrom2011–2015.
DefendantsThemostcommontypeofforceusedbydefendantsagainstofficersin2015washandswhichwereused359times(78percent),comparedto323timesin2014,anincreaseof11percent.Thenextmostcommontypeof forceusedbydefendantswasfeetwhichwereused49times(11percent),comparedto56timesin2014,adecreaseof12.5percent.Incidentsinvolvingbitingand/orspittingatofficersoccurred13times(3percent),comparedto8timesin2014,adecreaseof38.5percent.Aknifewasusedbydefendantsintwoincidents(0.4percent),comparedto6incidentsin2014,adecreaseof67percent.Vehicleswerereportedusedintwoincidents(0.4percent),comparedtonoincidentsreportedin2014.Defendantsresistingarrestandusingtheirbodiestopushorpullawayfromofficers,andothertypesofforcenototherwisespecified,comprisedtheremainingpercentageofincidents(7.8percent)reportedin2015,aswasthecasein2014.
050
100150200250300350400450
TYPES OF FORCE USED BY OFFICERS2011‐ 2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
![Page 16: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
14
Thechartbelowshows thebreakdownof themostcommontypesof forceusedbydefendants in2015.
Note:Insomeincidents,thereweremultipledefendantsthatusedmorethanonetypeofforceagainstofficers.
Thechartbelowsummarizestherecurrenttypesofforceusedbydefendantsin2015comparedto2014,whichisalsoconsistentwiththemostcommontypesofforceusedbydefendants in2011–2015.
359
49
132
2
36
TYPES OF FORCE USED BY DEFENDANTS
Hands
Feet
Biting/Spitting
Vehicles
Knife
Other
050100150200250300350400
TYPES OF FORCE USED BY DEFENDANTS2015VS.2014
2015
2014
![Page 17: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
15
ElectronicControlDevices(ECD)The department currently has 562ElectronicControlDevices (ECDs) that are issued to qualifiedofficersaftertheycompleteextensivetrainingandcertificationinitsuse.Inaddition,officersmustattend40hoursofCrisisInterventionTraining (CIT)beforeanECDcanbecarried.Oncecertified,officersarealsorequiredtocompleteannualrecertificationtrainingtobeauthorizedtocontinuetocarryanECD.In2015,anECDwasdeployed59times(13percentoftotaluseofforceincidents),comparedto63timesin20141,adecreaseof6percent.AbreakdownofECDdeploymentsandpercentagesofthetotaluseofforcereportsbydistrictfor2015isprovidedinthetablebelow.
2015
DISTRICTTOTALUSEOFFORCEINCIDENTSREPORTED ECDDEPLOYMENTS
%ECDDEPLOYMENTSOFTOTALUSEOFFORCEINCIDENTS
1D 22 4 182D 63 7 113D 140 19 144D 95 11 125D 71 6 96D 60 12 20
TOTAL 451 59 13
*Forpurposesofthischart,ECDuseisreportedbylocationoftheincident,notbydutyassignmentoftheofficer.
1 ThenumberofECDusesin2014wasrevisedto63afterreleaseofthe2014AnnualUseofForceReport.
0
100
200
300
400
TYPES OF FORCE USED BY DEFENDANTS2011‐ 2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
![Page 18: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
16
AchartsummarizingtheECDdatapresentedinthetableonthepreviouspageispresentedbelow.
ThechartbelowcomparesECDusebyDistrictfor2015and2014.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
Use of Force Reports 22 63 140 95 71 60
ECD Use 4 7 19 11 6 12
ECDUSE BY DISTRICT
0
5
10
15
20
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
2015 4 7 19 11 6 12
2014 4 6 14 19 7 13
ECDUSE BY DISTRICT2015VS.2014
![Page 19: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
17
ThechartbelowsummarizesECDuseforalldistricts(county‐wide)from2011–2015.
Since 2011, ECD deployments have decreased 65.5 percent. Since 2013, ECD deployments havedecreased60percent,while thenumberof officers trained and certifiedhas remained relativelyconstant(approximately44percentofthedepartment’sswornpersonnelcomplement).
ThemaponthefollowingpageshowsthelocationsofreportedECDusesbypolicereportingarea(PRA)foreachpolicedistrictfrom2011–2015.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
ECD Use 171 115 148 63 59
ECDUSE2011‐ 2015
![Page 20: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
18
ThisdatahighlightssignificantconcentrationsofTaserusebyofficersincertainareasofthe3rdand4thdistricts(50percentoftheTaserusesreportedfrom2011–2015),andsmallerconcentrationsofTaserusesreportedinspecificareasof5Dand6D.TheSilverSpringandWheatondistrictsarealsothedistrictswhereofficerstraditionallyrespondtothelargestnumberofcallsforservice,andthedistricts thataregenerally responsible for50percentormoreof thearrests reportedby thedepartmentonanannualbasis.
INJURIESTOOFFICERSANDDEFENDANTSIn2015,128officersreportedsustainingsometypeofinjury(ormultipleinjuries)duringauseofforce incident. This represents a 6 percent increase from 2014 when there were 121 reportedinjuriestoofficers.Thenumberofdefendantinjuriesincreasedfrom239injuriesreportedin2014to241injuriesin2015,a0.8percentincrease.
1D = Rockville 2D = Bethesda 3D = Silver Spring 4D = Wheaton 5D = Germantown 6D = Gaithersburg
![Page 21: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
19
Note:Fordefendants,aninjuryisrecordedontheUseofForceReportregardlessofwhetheritisavisibleinjuryorthedefendantclaimsaninjury.
In2015,91percentofthereportedinjuriestoofficersinvolvedbruises/sorenessorlacerationsandabrasions. Similarly, 82percentof the injuries reported sustainedbydefendants (or claimsof aninjurybydefendants)alsoinvolvedbruises/sorenessorlacerationsandabrasions.ThechartbelowprovidesabreakdownoftheUseofForceReportsthatwerecompleted,thenumberofinjuriessustainedbyofficers,andthenumberofinjuriessustained(orclaimed)bydefendantsbydistrictofoccurrencein2015.
Basedonthe totaluseof force incidentsreportedbyalldistricts in2015,officersreportedbeinginjured in approximately 28 percent of use of force incidents, while defendants reported beinginjured(orclaimedbeinginjured)inapproximately54percentoftheincidents.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2015 2014
OFFICER AND DEFENDANT INJURIES2015VS.2014
Officer Injuries
Defendant Injuries
020406080
100120140
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
Total Force Incidents 22 63 140 95 71 60
Officer Injuries 17 16 26 17 24 28
Defendant Injuries 12 29 73 56 36 35
OFFICER AND DEFENDANT INJURIESDISTRICT SUMMARY
![Page 22: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
20
Thefollowingchartshowsafiveyearsummaryofreportedofficeranddefendantinjuriesrelatedtoincidentswheresometypeofforcewasused.
Since2011, injuries to officershavedecreased approximately15percent, anddefendant injuries(orclaimsofinjuries),haveincreasedapproximately125percentduringthesametimeframe.Theaveragenumberofofficersreportedbeinginjuredforthisfiveyearperiodis133,andtheaveragenumberofdefendantssustainingorclaimingsometypeofinjuryis170.
MEDICALTREATMENTFOROFFICERSANDDEFENDANTSOfficersIn2015,54officers(42percent)requiredsomeformofmedicaltreatment(firstaidadministeredon scene ormedical follow‐up at a hospital), a 5 percent decrease compared to 2014 when 57officerssoughtsometypeofmedicaltreatment.Nineofficersthatreportedinjuriesin2015refusedtreatment(7percent).Thechartonthenextpageshowsthetypeofmedical treatmentneededforofficersasaresultofreportingbeinginjuredin2015.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Officer Injuries 150 134 131 122 128
Defendant Injuries 107 92 169 239 241
OFFICER AND DEFENDANT INJURIES2011‐ 2015
![Page 23: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
21
In one incident involving a bite, officers were requested to respond to assist fire and rescuepersonnel with an individual threatening them and exhibiting signs and symptoms of exciteddelirium.Astheofficersattemptedtocontrolthesubjectandplacehimintocustody,hebitdownon one of the officers’ fingers andwould not let go. Despite the extent of the injury, the officercontinued to attempt to gain control of the subject’s hands until he and other officers wereeventually able to handcuff the subject. The subject was transported to the hospital for anemergencyevaluationpetition.Thechartbelowsummarizes thenumberofofficers requiringmedical treatment(firstaidand/ortreatmentatahospital)forinjuriessustainedinuseofforceincidentsreportedfrom2011–2015.
Since2011,thenumberofofficersrequiringmedicaltreatmentforinjuriessustainedduringuseofforceincidentshasdecreased21percent.
0
10
20
30
40
2015 2014
MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR OFFICERS2015VS.2014
First Aid
Hospital
0
10
20
30
40
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
First Aid 48 44 40 35 29
Hospital 20 25 31 23 25
MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR OFFICERS2011‐ 2015
![Page 24: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
22
DefendantsIn 2015, 114 defendants (47 percent) were transported to hospitals for some type of medicaltreatment, and70defendants (29percent)were treatedon‐scenewith first aid administeredbypoliceorfire/rescuepersonnel.Inaddition,43defendants(18percent)refusedanytypeofmedicaltreatment.Thisinformationissummarizedinthechartbelow.
Comparedto2014,thedatareportedfor2015associatedwithdefendantmedicaltreatmentreflectsadecreaseof37percentinthenumberofdefendantsrequiringfirstaid,a4percentincreaseinthenumber of defendants transported to hospitals for treatment, and a 54 percent increase in thenumberofdefendantsthatrefusedtreatment.The chart below summarizes the number of defendants requiring medical treatment (first aidand/ortreatmentatahospital)forinjuriessustained(orclaimed)inuseofforceincidentsreportedfrom2011–2015.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2015 2014
DEFENDANT MEDICAL TREATMENT2015VS.2014
First Aid
Hospital
020406080
100120140
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
First Aid 113 87 108 111 70
Hospital 123 97 130 110 114
DEFENDANT MEDICAL TREATMENT2011‐ 2015
![Page 25: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
23
Since2011,thenumberofdefendantsrequiringmedicaltreatmentforinjuriessustainedduringuseofforceincidents(orclaimsofaninjury)hasdecreased22percent.
OFFICERSASSAULTED/AMBUSHEDForstateandfederalreportingrequirements,thedepartmentcapturesinformationwhenanofficerreportsbeingassaultedorambushed.In2015,283officersreportedbeingassaulted,anincreaseof22.5percentcomparedto2014when231officersreportedbeingassaulted.Asummaryoftheseincidentsreportedbydistrictin2015isshownbelow.
Thechartbelowcomparesthenumberofofficersreportedbeingassaultedin2015and2014.
In2015,noofficersreportedbeingambushed,thesamenumberreportedin2014.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
Officers Assaulted 24 25 105 37 53 39
OFFICERS ASSAULTED
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2014 2015
Officers Assaulted 231 283
OFFICERS ASSAULTED2015VS.2014
![Page 26: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
24
The following chart is a five year summary of officers who reported being assaulted and/orambushed.
From2011–2015,thenumberofofficerswhoreportedbeingassaultedrelatedtoauseofforceincidentincreased13percent.
CONTRIBUTINGFACTORSInapproximately183(41percent)oftheuseofforceincidentsreportedin2015,defendantswerereportedtohaveconsumedalcohol,comparedto190incidentsin2014,adecreaseof4percent.Inaddition,someformofdruguse(otherthanalcohol)wasreportedin111incidents(25percent)in2015,comparedto109incidentsin2014,anincreaseof2percent.In65percentoftheincidentsreported in 2015 where officers employed some type of force, the defendants were under theinfluenceofalcoholand/ordrugs.In2015, 121defendants (27percent) encounteredbypolicewere reported tobe suffering fromsome form ofmental illness. This is a 2.5 percent increase compared to 2014when 118 of thereported incidents involved individuals suffering from some form of mental illness. The 121incidents involving defendants reported to be suffering from mental illness constitutesapproximately2percentofthetotaleventsclassifiedasmentalillness‐relatedin2015.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Officers Assaulted 250 225 252 231 283
Officers Ambushed 3 1 2 0 0
OFFICERS ASSAULTED/AMBUSHED2011‐ 2015
![Page 27: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
25
Thechartbelowisasummaryofthecontributingfactorsreportedin2015.
Note:Inseveralincidents,defendantswerereportedtobeundertheinfluenceofalcoholanddrugs,andinsomeinstances,alsosufferingfromsomeformofmentalillness.
It is also important to note that in some situations, defendants under the influence of alcoholand/ordrugsorsufferingfrommentalillness,maynotcomplywithanofficer’spresenceorverbalcommands,therebynecessitatingtheuseofsometypeofphysicalforcetogaincompliance.Thechartbelowshowsasummaryofthecontributingfactorsreportedin2015comparedto2014.
0
50
100
150
200
Alcohol Drugs Mental Illness
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
0255075
100125150175200
Alcohol Drugs Mental Illness
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS2015VS.2014
2015
2014
![Page 28: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
26
The followingchart showsa five‐year summaryofuseof force incidentswheredefendantswerereportedtobeundertheinfluenceofalcoholand/ordrugs,orsufferingfrommentalillness.
The data shows that over the five year period from 2011 – 2015, there has been a 20 percentdecreaseinthenumberofincidentswherealcoholwasacontributingfactor,a147percentincreaseintheincidentswheresometypeofdrug(s)wereinvolved,anda120percentincreaseinincidentswhereindividualsweresufferingfromsomeformofmentalillness.
AGE‐RACE‐ETHNICITYANDGENDEROFDEFENDANTSANDOFFICERSRace/EthnicityThe following chart shows a breakdown of the race/ethnicity of defendants for arrestsmade in2015.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Alcohol 229 215 245 190 183
Drugs 45 34 134 109 111
Mental Illness 55 86 95 118 121
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS2011‐ 2015
050010001500200025003000
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
African American 530 580 2822 1569 947 1273
Caucasian 694 936 744 1195 683 892
Asian or Pacific Islander 65 83 57 95 40 82
Hispanic 367 214 1007 1771 241 791
American Indian orAlaskan Native
0 0 0 2 0 2
ARRESTS BY DISTRICT
![Page 29: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
27
The chart below shows the number ofuseof force incidents reported in 2015 bydistrict, and abreakdownoftherace/ethnicityofthedefendantsinvolvedinthoseincidents.
Thefollowingchartshowsthepercentageoftherace/ethnicityofthedefendantsinvolvedintheuseofforceincidentsreportedbyeachdistrictin2015.
The majority of defendants involved in use of force incidents reported in 2015 were AfricanAmericanandCaucasian,comprisingapproximately87percent(394)oftheuseofforceincidentsreported.AsianorPacificIslanderdefendantscomprisedapproximately2percent(7),andHispanicdefendants accounted for the remaining 11 percent (50) of defendants involved in use of forceincidents.
020406080
100120
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
African American 9 27 105 37 40 35
Caucasian 7 30 23 38 26 17
Asian or PacificIslander
3 0 1 1 2 0
Hispanic 3 6 11 19 3 8
DEFENDANT RACE/ETHNICITY
0
20
40
60
80
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D
DEFENDANT RACE/ETHNICITY PERCENTAGES
African American Caucasian Asian or Pacific Islander Hispanic
![Page 30: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
28
Thechartbelowshowsasummaryofthedefendants’race/ethnicitybasedonthenumberofuseofforceincidentsreportedin2015.
The chart below shows a summary of the defendants’ race/ethnicity in use of force incidentsreportedin2015comparedto2014.
253141
7
50
DEFENDANT RACE/ETHNICITY
African American
Caucasian
Asian or PacificIslander
Hispanic
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
AfricanAmerican
Caucasian Asian orPacificIslander
Hispanic
DEFENDANT RACE/ETHNICITY2015VS.2014
2015
2014
![Page 31: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
29
The followingchart shows the race/ethnicityof thedefendants involved inuseof force incidentsreportedcounty‐widefrom2011‐2015.
Overthefiveyearperiodfrom2011–2015,thefollowingdemographic‐relatedtrendsarenotable: The number of African American defendants involved in reported use of force incidents
increased10.5percent.
ThenumberofCaucasiandefendantsinvolvedinreporteduseofforceincidentsdecreased20percent.
ThenumberofAsian/PacificIslanderdefendantsinvolvedinreporteduseofforceincidents
decreased42percent. ThenumberofHispanicdefendantsinvolvedinreporteduseofforceincidentsdecreased15
percent.Since 2011, African Americans have been involved in 50 percent of the reported use of forceincidents, Caucasians have been involved in 35 percent of reported incidents, Asian/PacificIslandershavebeeninvolvedin1.6percentofincidents,andHispanicshavebeeninvolvedin13.4percentofreporteduseofforceincidents.Race/Ethnicity&AgeofDefendantsandOfficerThe chart on the next page shows the department demographics of its sworn personnelcomplementasofDecember2015.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
DEFENDANT RACE/ETHNICITY2011‐ 2015
African American
Caucasian
Asian or Pacific Islander
Hispanic
![Page 32: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
30
The following section includes a summary based on information compiled from theUseofForceReports submitted in2015where the race‐ethnicityandageof thedefendant andprimaryofficerwerenotedontheMCPForm37. Asnotedearlier,inthemajorityofuseofforceincidents,therearemore than two officers involved. However, the data reflected in the chart only indicates therace‐ethnicityoftheprimaryofficersthatwereresponsibleforcompletingtheMCPForm37.
AgesofDefendantsandOfficersAgesofDefendantsThe chartson thenextpage showabreakdownof the age groupsof thedefendants andofficersbased on the information reported on use of force reports completed by officers in 2015.Defendants ages 18 to 29 and 30 to 39 accounted for approximately 69 percent of the totalindividualsinvolvedinuseofforceincidentsreportedin2015,comparedto68percentin2014.
0200400600800
1000 816
169107 34 36 7 70 15 1
DEPARTMENT DEMOGRAPHICSSWORN PERSONNEL
050100150200250
AfricanAmerican
Caucasian Asian orPacificIslander
Hispanic
African American 28 204 8 16
Caucasian 15 111 6 9
Asian or Pacific Islander 0 5 1 1
Hispanic 2 37 2 8
DEFENDANT‐OFFICER RACE/ETHNICITY
Defendan
t
Officer
![Page 33: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
31
Defendantsundertheageof18wereinvolvedin12percent(55)oftheincidentsreportedin2015,whiledefendantsages40andoldercomprisedtheremaining19percent(85).Forallagecategoriesin2015,theaverageageofthedefendants involvedinuseofforceincidentswas30;comparedto29in2014.Thefollowingchartprovidesabreakdownoftheagegroupsofthedefendantsinvolveduseofforceincidentsin2015.
The chart below shows a summary of the age groups of the defendants involved in use of forceincidentsreportedin2015comparedto2014.
55
214
97
85
AGE GROUPS OF DEFENDANTS
Under 18
18 to 29
30 to 39
40 and Older
0
50
100
150
200
250
Under 18 18 to 29 30 to 39 40 andOlder
AGE GROUPS OF DEFENDANTS2015VS.2014
2015
2014
![Page 34: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
32
Thechartbelowshowstheagegroupsofthedefendantsinvolvedinuseofforceincidentsreportedcounty‐widefrom2011‐2015.Theaverageageofthedefendantsacrossallagegroupsis29.7.
A review of the data over this five year span shows an increase of 8 percent in the number ofdefendantsundertheageof18,a4.5percentdecreaseinthenumberofdefendantsages18to29,a15.5percent increase indefendants in the30‐39 age group, and an11.5 percentdecrease in thenumberofdefendantsages40andolder.AgesofOfficersForallagecategoriesin2015,theaverageageoftheofficersinvolvedinuseofforceincidentswas33,comparedto32in2014.The following chartprovides abreakdownof the agegroupsof theofficers involveduseof forceincidentsin2015.
0
50
100
150
200
250
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
AGE GROUPS OF DEFENDANTS2011‐ 2015
Under 18
18 to 29
30 to 39
40 and Older
199
152
7525
AGE GROUPS OF OFFICERS
20 to 29
30 to 39
40 to 49
50>
![Page 35: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
33
Thechartbelowshowsasummaryoftheagegroupsoftheofficersinvolvedinuseofforceincidentsreportedin2015comparedto2014.
The chart below shows the age groupsof theofficers involved inuseof force incidents reportedcounty‐widefrom2011‐2015.Theaverageageofofficersacrossallagegroupsforthisperiodis34.
A review of the data over this five year span shows an increase of 42 percent in the number ofofficersinthe20to29agegroup,a16percentdecreaseinthenumberofofficersages30to39,a29percentdecreaseinthenumberofofficersinthe40‐49agegroup,anda178percentincreaseinthenumberofofficersages50andolder.
0
50
100
150
200
20 to 29 30 to 39 40‐49 50>
AGE GROUPS OF OFFICERS2015VS.2014
2015
2014
0
50
100
150
200
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
AGE GROUPS OF OFFICERS2011‐2015
20 to 29
30 to 39
40 to 49
50>
![Page 36: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
34
GenderDefendantsOf thedefendants involved inuseof force incidents in2015,78percent (351)weremale and22percent(100)werefemale,asshowninthechartbelow.
In2014,maleswereinvolvedin344(82percent)useofforceincidentsandfemaleswereinvolvedin74 (18percent)of the incidents.This representsa2percentdecrease in thenumberofmalesinvolved in use of force incidents, and a 35 percent increase in the number of females involved,comparedto2015asshownbelow.
351
100
GENDER OF DEFENDANTS
Male
Female
050
100150200250300350400
2014 2015
GENDER OF DEFENDANTS2015VS.2014
Male
Female
![Page 37: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
35
Afiveyearsummaryofthegenderofthedefendants involvedinreporteduseofforceincidentsisprovidedbelow.
OfficersOftheofficersinvolvedinuseofforceincidentsreportedin2015,89percent(403)weremaleandapproximately11percent(48)werefemale,asshowninthechartbelow.
In2014,maleofficerswereinvolvedin379(91percent)useofforceincidents,andfemaleofficerswere involved in 39 (9 percent) of the incidents. This represents an 8 percent increase in thenumber ofmales involved in use of force incidents and a 23 percent increase in the number offemalesinvolvedcomparedto2015.
0
100
200
300
400
500
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Male 401 366 414 344 351
Female 76 60 67 74 100
GENDER OF DEFENDANTS2011‐ 2015
Male
Female
403
48
GENDER OF OFFICERS
Male
Female
![Page 38: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
36
The chart belowprovides a comparisonof the genderof theofficers involved in theuseof forceincidentsreportedin2015and2014.
A five year summary of the gender of the officers involved in reported use of force incidents isprovidedinthefollowingchart.
YEARSONDEPARTMENTOFOFFICERSIn 2015, 67 percent of the officers involved in reported use of force incidents served on thedepartment between one to 10 years, compared to 71 percent in 2014. Officers serving on thedepartment for more than 10 years comprised the remaining 33 percent of officers involved,comparedto29percentin2014.
050
100150200250300350400450
2014 2015
GENDER OF OFFICERS2015VS.2014
Male
Female
0
100
200
300
400
500
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Male 400 368 383 379 403
Female 82 65 98 39 48
GENDER OF OFFICERS2011‐ 2015
Male
Female
![Page 39: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
37
Asummaryoftheofficers’yearsofexperienceandpercentageofuseofforceincidentsfor2015isshowninthefollowingchart.
Acomparisonoftheofficers’yearsofexperienceandtheirpercentageofinvolvementinuseofforceincidentsfor2015and2014basedonavailabledataispresentedbelow.
Thisdatareflectsminorvariations in thepercentages ineachexperiencecategory,except for theofficerswith6to10yearsofexperiencewhichshowsa19percentdecreasein2015comparedto2014,anda133percentincreaseinthe21to25yearsofexperiencecategory.
0
100
200
300
<1 1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 >25
145
22 16 7 7 3
YEARS ON DEPARTMENT ANDPERCENTAGE OF INCIDENTS
Years on Department Percentage of Use of Force Incidents
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to15
16 to20
21 to25
>25
2015 45 22 16 7 7 3
2014 44 27 15 8 3 3
YEARS ON DEPARTMENT AND PERCENTAGE OF INCIDENTS2015VS.2014
![Page 40: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
38
ALLEGATIONSANDINVESTIGATIONSTherewere12useof force‐relatedcomplaintsmadetothedepartment’s InternalAffairsDivision(IAD) in 2015 that prompted formal investigations, an increase of 20 percent compared to thenumber of complaints received in 2014 (10). These investigations are formal investigationsconductedbyIADinaccordancewiththeLawEnforcementOfficer’sBillofRights.AsummaryofthecomplaintsrelatedtouseofforceincidentsreceivedbyIADfrom2011–2015isoutlinedbelow.
Since 2011, the data indicates a 37 percent decrease in the number of use of force‐relatedcomplaintsmadeagainstofficers.
IN‐CUSTODYDEATHSAn in‐custody death generally refers to the death of an individual while in the custody of lawenforcement officerswhen the death is not directly caused by a use of deadly force. Deathmayoccur from contributing circumstances, such asmedical problems, that are identified or developwhileapersonisinpolicecustody.Noin‐custodydeathsoccurredin2015,thesamenumberreportedin2014.
DEADLYFORCEINCIDENTSDeadlyforceisdefinedasany useofforcethat isintendedtoorlikelytocauseasubstantialriskofdeath or seriousphysical injury.Officersmay usedeadly force todefend themselvesoranotherperson from what they reasonably believe is an imminent threat of death or seriousphysicalinjury.Allincidentsthatinvolvetheuseofdeadlyforceorin‐custodydeathsareinvestigatedbythedepartment’sMajorCrimesDivision(MCD).
19
37
23
10 12
051015202530354045
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
IADALLEGATIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS
Use of Force Complaints
![Page 41: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
39
Anon‐dutypatrolsupervisor isrequiredtorespondtoallECDdeployments, firearmdischarges(exceptforthehumanedestructionofnon‐domesticanimals),useof12‐gaugeimpactprojectiles,and any use of force that results in serious bodily injury or in‐custody death. Supervisors arerequiredtonotifyMCDofanysituationsthatmeetthefollowingcriteria: Allintentionalfirearmdischargesbyanemployee,whetherinjuriesoccurornot,withthe
exceptionofauthorizedrangepracticeorthedestructionofdangerousorinjuredanimals;
All accidental firearm discharges by an employee that result in an injury to anyone,includingtheinvolvedofficer;and
All incidents where an individual sustains life‐threatening injury as a result of policeaction.
DeadlyForceIncidentsDeadly force was used in only one incident in 2015 that resulted in no civilian fatalities. ThisincidentwaspresentedtoaMontgomeryCountyGrandJuryandwasdeterminedtobejustified.In2014, therewere threedeadly force incidentsreported.These incidentswerealsoreviewedbyaGrandJuryanddeterminedtobejustifiedusesofdeadlyforce.OnDecember9,2015,aMCPDOfficerattemptedtoconductatrafficstoponavehicle.Thevehiclerefusedtostopandapursuitofthesuspecteddrunkdriverensued.Thepursuitledtotheendofaresidentialstreetandtheofficerobservedthevehiclepullintoadrivewayandstrikethegarageofaresidence.Officersapproachedthevehicleandissuedcommandstothedrivertoexit thevehicle.Instead,thedriverplacedthevehicleinreverseandattemptedtofleeagain.Thevehiclecontinuedto back up into the street, then came to amomentary stop. The quickmovement of the vehiclecausedanofficerwhowasatthesideofittonowbeinfront.Theofficeragainissuedcommandstostop,butthedriveracceleratedquicklytowardstheofficerandtheofficer firedoneshot intothevehicle.Therounddidnotstrikethedriver.Thevehiclecontinuedandstrucktheofficer,causinghimtorollontothehoodof thevehicleandthenfallontothestreet.Thedriverdroveawayandapursuitensuedthatlastedforseveralminutesuntilthedriverwasinvolvedinacollisionthatdisabledthevehicle.Thesuspectfledonfootforashort distance, at which time an officer deployed an ECD and the subject was successfullyapprehended.
![Page 42: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
40
Afiveyearsummaryofin‐custodydeathsanddeadlyforceincidentsisshowninthechartbelow.
Since2011,thedataindicatesadecreaseof80percentinthenumberofdeadlyforceincidentsinthecounty.
SUMMARYIn 2015, officers reported 451 use of force incidents, an increase of 8 percent from 2014. Alldistricts experienced an increase in the number of reported use of force incidents, except forWheaton(4D)andGaithersburg(6D).TheWheatonDistrictexperienceda14percentdecreaseinuseofforceincidents,andtheGaithersburgDistrictexperienceda26percentdecrease.
TheuseofanytypeofforcebyMCPDofficerscontinuestoconstituteaverysmallpercentageoftheoverallcallsforservicethatofficersrespondtoonadailybasis.In2015,officersonlyusedforcein0.22percentofthetotalcalls forservice,andinonly2.5percentofallarrestsituations.Overthepast five years, Montgomery County has averaged approximately 453 reported use of forceincidents annually. During this same timeframe, there has also been a 6 percent decrease in theoverallnumberofincidentsreported.
Officers responding to reports of assaults accounted for 42 percent of all reported use of forceincidentsin2015,whichisasignificantincreasecomparedtothepreviousyear.Makingarrests(orattempting to make arrests), serving emergency evaluation petitions, and defending againstassaultsconstituted95percentofincidentswheresometypeofforcewasused.
Callsforserviceinvolvingassaults,narcotics/DUIoffenses,anddisorderlyconductaccountedfor66percentofallreporteduseofforceincidents.Overthefiveyearperiodfrom2011‐2015,theneedto use force in situations involving assaults increased 6 percent, while incidents involvingnarcotics/DUI offenses decreased 29 percent, and calls for service involving disorderly conductwhereforcewasuseddecreased19percent.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
In‐Custody Deaths 1 1 1 0 0
Deadly Force 5 4 3 3 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN‐CUSTODY DEATHS AND DEADLYFORCE INCIDENTS
![Page 43: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
41
The type of force most commonly used by officers was hands, which increased 20 percentcompared to 2014. The type of force most commonly used against officers by defendants washands,whichincreased11percentcomparedto2014.Defendantsalsousedtheirfeetattemptingtokick officers, and attempted to bite or spit at officers in 14 percent of the incidents reported in2015.Theuseofhandsand/orfeetasameanstopreventbeingplacedintocustodycontinuestobethemostcommonmeansofforce/resistanceusedbydefendants.
TheuseofECDsbyofficerscontinuedtodeclinein2015.ECDsweredeployedinonly13percentofallreporteduseofforceincidentsin2015.UseofECDsdeclined6percentfromthepreviousyear,andsince2013,ECDusebyofficershasdeclined60percent.
In2015,thenumberofreportedassaultsonofficersincreasedalmost23percentcomparedtothepreviousyear.Over thepast fiveyears, thenumberofofficersreportedbeingassaulted inuseofforce incidents has increased 13 percent. In addition, injuries sustained by officers increased 6percentfrom2014,whileinjuriestodefendantsincreasedlessthanonepercent.In2015,officersreported being injured in 28 percent of reported use of force incidents, and defendants wereinjured (or claimed to be injured) in 54percent of incidents. Since 2011, the number of officersinjured has declined 23 percent, while the number of defendants reported being injured (orclaimingtheywereinjured)hasdecreased24percent.
Officers requiredmedical treatment in42percentof thereporteduseof force incidents in2015,anddefendantsrequiredtreatment in47percentof incidents.Since2011, thenumberofofficersrequiringmedical treatment for injuriessustainedduringuseof force incidentshasdecreased21percent,andthenumberofdefendantsrequiringmedicaltreatmentforinjuriessustainedduringauseofforceincident(orclaimingtobeinjured),hasdecreased22percent.
In65percentoftheincidentswhereofficersemployedsometypeofforcein2015,defendantswerereportedtobeundertheinfluenceofalcoholand/ordrugs.Thedatashowsthatoverthefiveyearperiodfrom2011–2015,therehasbeena20percentdecreaseinthenumberofincidentsreportedwherealcoholwasacontributingfactor,anda147percentincreaseinincidentswheresometypeofdrug(s)areinvolved.Defendantssufferingfromsomeformofmentalillnesswereinvolvedin27percentofthereporteduseofforceincidentsin2015,anincreaseofalmost3percentcomparedtothepreviousyear.Since2011,therehasbeena120percentincreaseinincidentswhereindividualsencounteredbyofficersweresufferingfromsomeformofmentalillness.In2015,87percentofthedefendantsinvolvedinuseofforceincidentswereAfricanAmericanandCaucasian, compared to 86 percent in 2014. Since 2011, African American and Caucasiandefendantshavebeeninvolvedin85percentofthereporteduseof force incidents inthecounty.Asian/PacificIslanderdefendantshavebeeninvolvedinapproximately2percentofincidents,andHispanicshavebeeninvolvedinapproximately13percentofuseofforceincidents.Defendantsinthe18‐39agecategoryaccountedfor69percentoftheuseofforceincidentsin2015.Defendants under the age of 18were involved in 12 percent of the incidents reported in 2015,while defendants ages 40 and older comprised the remaining 19 percent. This breakdown isessentially the same as the experience reported in 2014, and fairly consistent with the datareportedoverthelastfiveyears.Theaverageagesofthedefendantsandofficersinvolvedinuseofforceincidentsreportedin2015wereverysimilar,withtheaverageageofdefendantsbeing30,and33forofficers.
![Page 44: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
42
Areviewofthedataoverthelastfiveyearsshowsmodestincreases(approximately8percent)inthenumberofdefendantsundertheageof18,anda15.5percentincreaseindefendantsinthe30‐39agegroup.For officers over the same five year period, the data reflects an increase of 42 percent in thenumberofofficersages20to29,anda178percentincreaseinthenumberofofficersages50andolder.Thedataalsoindicatesdecreasesinthenumberofofficersintheagegroupsof30‐39and40‐49of16percentand29percent,respectively.Intermsofgender,maledefendantsandmaleofficerscontinuetobeinvolvedinthemajorityofuseof force incidents. Male defendants were involved in 78 percent of the use of force incidentsreported in 2015, while male officers were involved in 89 percent of the incidents. Femaledefendants were reported to be involved in 22 percent of incidents, while female officers wereinvolvedin11percentofuseofforceincidents.In 2015, 67 percent of the officers involved in use of force incidents served on the departmentbetweenoneto10years.Thisisconsistentwiththecurrentcompositionofthedepartment’sswornpersonnelcomplementwhich,inthelastfiveyears,hasseenaninfluxofyoungerofficersasolder,moreexperiencedofficershaveretired.There were 12 use of force‐related complaints made against officers in 2015 compared to 10complaintsin2014,anincreaseof20percent.Deadlyforcewasonlyusedinoneincidentin2015,comparedtothreeincidentsreportedin2014,a67percentdecrease.Since2011, therehasbeenan80percentdecrease in thenumberofdeadlyforceincidentsreportedinthecounty.Furthermore,noin‐custodydeathsoccurredin2015,aswasthecasein2014.The Montgomery County Police Department regularly provides information to educate thecommunity on its use of force training and policy guidelines. District Commanders and policeexecutive staffmeet regularlywith various community groups and stakeholder organizations toshare information and listen to concerns. Another extremely positive department initiativedesigned to educate citizensaboutpolicework, includingpoliceuseof force, is thedepartment’sCitizen Academy. This program was originally developed as an extension of the department’scommunity policing efforts and it continues to provide the department with an excellentopportunitytohelpcitizensincreasetheirknowledgeandunderstandingaboutthecomplexnatureofpolicework,includingpoliceuseofforce.TheMontgomeryCountyPoliceDepartmentiscommittedtoensuringthesafetyofthepublicanditsofficers.Moving forward, thedepartment’s continuedcommitment to communitypolicing is acritical component tomaintaining public trust and confidence, and establishing andmaintainingvaluable relationships that directly contribute to enhancedpolice‐citizen engagement that buildsmutualrespectamongofficersandthecommunitiestheyprotectandserve.
![Page 45: Use of Force Report 2015 External Final 041516a · INTRODUCTION The information presented in this annual report is obtained from the Use of Force reports completed by officers for](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022050121/5f51005fa6017f6a052ed768/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
43
MONTGOMERYCOUNTYDEPARTMENTOFPOLICE100EdisonParkDriveGaithersburg,MD20878
http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/pol/
FollowusonFacebookandTwitter!