IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK)

Next Court Deadline: March 6, 2002 Tunney Act Hearing

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”), the States of New York, Ohio, Illinois,

Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina and Wisconsin (collectively, the “Settling

States”) and Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), by and through their respective

attorneys, having agreed to the entry of this Stipulation, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that:

1. A Final Judgment in the form attached hereto (“second revised proposed Final

Judgment”) may be filed and entered by the Court in this action and as to the Settling States only in

State of New York, et al. v. Microsoft (Civil Action No. 98-1233(CKK)), upon the motion of any

party or upon the Court’s own motion, at any time after compliance with the requirements of the

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16, and without further notice to any party or

other proceedings, provided that the United States has not withdrawn its consent, which it may do

at any time before the entry of the second revised proposed Final Judgment by serving notice thereof

on Microsoft and by filing that notice with the Court.

2. Microsoft’s prior obligations to comply with the revised proposed Final Judgment,

submitted to the Court on November 6, 2001, shall continue uninterrupted under this Stipulation and

- 2 -

the second revised proposed Final Judgment (except as modified by the second revised proposed

Final Judgment) as if the second revised proposed Final Judgment was in full force and effect.

Unless otherwise provided in the second revised proposed Final Judgment, Microsoft shall

immediately begin complying with the second revised proposed Final Judgment as if it was in full

force and effect. Where the second revised proposed Final Judgment provides that the timing of

Microsoft’s obligations are calculated from the date of submission to the Court of the second revised

proposed Final Judgment, the time shall be calculated from November 6, 2001, the date of

submission to the Court of the revised proposed Final Judgment. Subject to the foregoing, Microsoft

agrees to be bound by the provisions of the second revised proposed Final Judgment pending its

entry by the Court. If the United States withdraws its consent, or if (a) the second revised proposed

Final Judgment is not entered pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation, (b) the time has expired for

all appeals of any Court ruling declining to enter the second revised proposed Final Judgment, and

(c) the Court has not otherwise ordered continued compliance with the terms and provisions of the

second revised proposed Final Judgment, then all of the parties shall be released from all further

obligations under this Stipulation, and the making of this Stipulation shall be without prejudice to

any party in this or any other proceeding.

3. Once the requirements for compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 16, as set forth in the

Stipulation filed by the parties on November 6, 2001, have been satisfied, the United States will file

with the Court a certificate of compliance and a Motion for Entry of Second Revised Proposed Final

Judgment, unless it withdraws its consent to entry of the second revised proposed Final Judgment

pursuant to paragraph 2, above. At any time thereafter, and at the conclusion of any further

proceedings ordered by the Court pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(f), the Court may then enter the second

revised proposed Final Judgment, provided that the Court determines that entry of the second revised

proposed Final Judgment will serve the public interest.

- 3 -

DATED this 27th day of February, 2002

FOR PLAINTIFF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

____________________________________DEBORAH P. MAJORAS Deputy Assistant Attorney GeneralAntitrust DivisionUnited States Department of Justice901 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530(202) 514-2401

FOR PLAINTIFFS THE STATES OF NEW YORK,OHIO, ILLINOIS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA,MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, NORTH CAROLINAAND WISCONSIN:

____________________________________JAY L. HIMESChief Antitrust BureauOffice of the Attorney General of New York120 BroadwayNew York, New York 10271(212) 416-8282

- 4 -

FOR DEFENDANT MICROSOFT CORPORATION:

____________________________________CHARLES F. RULE Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20004(202) 639-7300

SECOND REVISED PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, plaintiffs United States of America (“United States”) and the States of NewYork, Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina andWisconsin and defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), by their respective attorneys,have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment;

AND WHEREAS, this Final Judgment does not constitute any admission by any partyregarding any issue of fact or law;

AND WHEREAS, Microsoft agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgmentpending its approval by the Court;

NOW THEREFORE, upon remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the District ofColumbia Circuit, and upon the consent of the aforementioned parties, it is herebyORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

I. JurisdictionThis Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the person of

Microsoft.

II. ApplicabilityThis Final Judgment applies to Microsoft and to each of its officers, directors, agents,

employees, subsidiaries, successors and assigns; and to all other persons in active concert orparticipation with any of them who shall have received actual notice of this Final Judgment bypersonal service or otherwise.

III. Prohibited Conduct

A. Microsoft shall not retaliate against an OEM by altering Microsoft’s commercial

relations with that OEM, or by withholding newly introduced forms of non-monetaryConsideration (including but not limited to new versions of existing forms of non-monetaryConsideration) from that OEM, because it is known to Microsoft that the OEM is or iscontemplating:

1. developing, distributing, promoting, using, selling, or licensing any softwarethat competes with Microsoft Platform Software or any product or service thatdistributes or promotes any Non-Microsoft Middleware;

2. shipping a Personal Computer that (a) includes both a Windows OperatingSystem Product and a non-Microsoft Operating System, or (b) will boot withmore than one Operating System; or

3. exercising any of the options or alternatives provided for under this FinalJudgment.

Nothing in this provision shall prohibit Microsoft from enforcing any provision of any licensewith any OEM or any intellectual property right that is not inconsistent with this FinalJudgment. Microsoft shall not terminate a Covered OEM’s license for a Windows OperatingSystem Product without having first given the Covered OEM written notice of the reasons forthe proposed termination and not less than thirty days’ opportunity to cure. Notwithstanding

- 2 -

the foregoing, Microsoft shall have no obligation to provide such a termination notice andopportunity to cure to any Covered OEM that has received two or more such notices duringthe term of its Windows Operating System Product license.

Nothing in this provision shall prohibit Microsoft from providing Consideration to any OEMwith respect to any Microsoft product or service where that Consideration is commensuratewith the absolute level or amount of that OEM’s development, distribution, promotion, orlicensing of that Microsoft product or service.

B. Microsoft’s provision of Windows Operating System Products to Covered OEMs shallbe pursuant to uniform license agreements with uniform terms and conditions. Withoutlimiting the foregoing, Microsoft shall charge each Covered OEM the applicable royalty forWindows Operating System Products as set forth on a schedule, to be established byMicrosoft and published on a web site accessible to the Plaintiffs and all Covered OEMs, thatprovides for uniform royalties for Windows Operating System Products, except that:

1. the schedule may specify different royalties for different language versions;

2. the schedule may specify reasonable volume discounts based upon the actualvolume of licenses of any Windows Operating System Product or any group ofsuch products; and

3. the schedule may include market development allowances, programs, or otherdiscounts in connection with Windows Operating System Products, providedthat:

a. such discounts are offered and available uniformly to all CoveredOEMs, except that Microsoft may establish one uniform discountschedule for the ten largest Covered OEMs and a second uniformdiscount schedule for the eleventh through twentieth largest CoveredOEMs, where the size of the OEM is measured by volume of licenses;

b. such discounts are based on objective, verifiable criteria that shall beapplied and enforced on a uniform basis for all Covered OEMs; and

c. such discounts or their award shall not be based on or impose anycriterion or requirement that is otherwise inconsistent with any portionof this Final Judgment.

C. Microsoft shall not restrict by agreement any OEM licensee from exercising any of thefollowing options or alternatives:

1. Installing, and displaying icons, shortcuts, or menu entries for, any Non-Microsoft Middleware or any product or service (including but not limited toIAP products or services) that distributes, uses, promotes, or supports any Non-Microsoft Middleware, on the desktop or Start menu, or anywhere else in aWindows Operating System Product where a list of icons, shortcuts, or menuentries for applications are generally displayed, except that Microsoft mayrestrict an OEM from displaying icons, shortcuts and menu entries for any

- 3 -

product in any list of such icons, shortcuts, or menu entries specified in theWindows documentation as being limited to products that provide particulartypes of functionality, provided that the restrictions are non-discriminatorywith respect to non-Microsoft and Microsoft products.

2. Distributing or promoting Non-Microsoft Middleware by installing and dis-playing on the desktop shortcuts of any size or shape so long as such shortcutsdo not impair the functionality of the user interface.

3. Launching automatically, at the conclusion of the initial boot sequence or sub-sequent boot sequences, or upon connections to or disconnections from theInternet, any Non-Microsoft Middleware if a Microsoft Middleware Productthat provides similar functionality would otherwise be launched automaticallyat that time, provided that any such Non-Microsoft Middleware displays on thedesktop no user interface or a user interface of similar size and shape to theuser interface displayed by the corresponding Microsoft Middleware Product.

4. Offering users the option of launching other Operating Systems from the BasicInput/Output System or a non-Microsoft boot-loader or similar program thatlaunches prior to the start of the Windows Operating System Product.

5. Presenting in the initial boot sequence its own IAP offer provided that theOEM complies with reasonable technical specifications established byMicrosoft, including a requirement that the end user be returned to the initialboot sequence upon the conclusion of any such offer.

6. Exercising any of the options provided in Section III.H of this Final Judgment.

D.Starting at the earlier of the release of Service Pack 1 for Windows XP or 12 months

after the submission of this Final Judgment to the Court, Microsoft shall disclose to ISVs,IHVs, IAPs, ICPs, and OEMs, for the sole purpose of interoperating with a WindowsOperating System Product, via the Microsoft Developer Network (“MSDN”) or similarmechanisms, the APIs and related Documentation that are used by Microsoft Middleware tointeroperate with a Windows Operating System Product. For purposes of this Section III.D,the term APIs means the interfaces, including any associated callback interfaces, thatMicrosoft Middleware running on a Windows Operating System Product uses to call uponthat Windows Operating System Product in order to obtain any services from that WindowsOperating System Product. In the case of a new major version of Microsoft Middleware, thedisclosures required by this Section III.D shall occur no later than the last major beta testrelease of that Microsoft Middleware. In the case of a new version of a Windows OperatingSystem Product, the obligations imposed by this Section III.D shall occur in a TimelyManner.

E. Starting nine months after the submission of this proposed Final Judgment to theCourt, Microsoft shall make available for use by third parties, for the sole purpose of inter-operating or communicating with a Windows Operating System Product, on reasonable andnon-discriminatory terms (consistent with Section III.I), any Communications Protocol that is,on or after the date this Final Judgment is submitted to the Court, (i) implemented in aWindows Operating System Product installed on a client computer, and (ii) used to

- 4 -

interoperate, or communicate, natively (i.e., without the addition of software code to the clientoperating system product) with a Microsoft server operating system product.

F. 1 Microsoft shall not retaliate against any ISV or IHV because of that ISV’s or IHV’s:

a. developing, using, distributing, promoting or supporting any softwarethat competes with Microsoft Platform Software or any software thatruns on any software that competes with Microsoft Platform Software,or

b. exercising any of the options or alternatives provided for under thisFinal Judgment.

2. Microsoft shall not enter into any agreement relating to a Windows OperatingSystem Product that conditions the grant of any Consideration on an ISV’srefraining from developing, using, distributing, or promoting any software thatcompetes with Microsoft Platform Software or any software that runs on anysoftware that competes with Microsoft Platform Software, except thatMicrosoft may enter into agreements that place limitations on an ISV’sdevelopment, use, distribution or promotion of any such software if thoselimitations are reasonably necessary to and of reasonable scope and duration inrelation to a bona fide contractual obligation of the ISV to use, distribute orpromote any Microsoft software or to develop software for, or in conjunctionwith, Microsoft.

3. Nothing in this section shall prohibit Microsoft from enforcing any provisionof any agreement with any ISV or IHV, or any intellectual property right, thatis not inconsistent with this Final Judgment.

G.Microsoft shall not enter into any agreement with:

1. any IAP, ICP, ISV, IHV or OEM that grants Consideration on the conditionthat such entity distributes, promotes, uses, or supports, exclusively or in afixed percentage, any Microsoft Platform Software, except that Microsoft mayenter into agreements in which such an entity agrees to distribute, promote, useor support Microsoft Platform Software in a fixed percentage wheneverMicrosoft in good faith obtains a representation that it is commerciallypracticable for the entity to provide equal or greater distribution, promotion,use or support for software that competes with Microsoft Platform Software, or

2. any IAP or ICP that grants placement on the desktop or elsewhere in anyWindows Operating System Product to that IAP or ICP on the condition thatthe IAP or ICP refrain from distributing, promoting or using any software thatcompetes with Microsoft Middleware.

Nothing in this section shall prohibit Microsoft from entering into (a) any bona fide jointventure or (b) any joint development or joint services arrangement with any ISV, IHV, IAP,ICP, or OEM for a new product, technology or service, or any material value-add to anexisting product, technology or service, in which both Microsoft and the ISV, IHV, IAP, ICP,

- 5 -

or OEM contribute significant developer or other resources, that prohibits such entity fromcompeting with the object of the joint venture or other arrangement for a reasonable period oftime.

This Section does not apply to any agreements in which Microsoft licenses intellectualproperty in from a third party.

H. Starting at the earlier of the release of Service Pack 1 for Windows XP or 12 monthsafter the submission of this Final Judgment to the Court, Microsoft shall:

1. Allow end users (via a mechanism readily accessible from the desktop or Startmenu such as an Add/Remove icon) and OEMs (via standard preinstallationkits) to enable or remove access to each Microsoft Middleware Product orNon-Microsoft Middleware Product by (a) displaying or removing icons, short-cuts, or menu entries on the desktop or Start menu, or anywhere else in aWindows Operating System Product where a list of icons, shortcuts, or menuentries for applications are generally displayed, except that Microsoft mayrestrict the display of icons, shortcuts, or menu entries for any product in anylist of such icons, shortcuts, or menu entries specified in the Windows docu-mentation as being limited to products that provide particular types of func-tionality, provided that the restrictions are non-discriminatory with respect tonon-Microsoft and Microsoft products; and (b) enabling or disabling automaticinvocations pursuant to Section III.C.3 of this Final Judgment that are used tolaunch Non-Microsoft Middleware Products or Microsoft Middleware Pro-ducts. The mechanism shall offer the end user a separate and unbiased choicewith respect to enabling or removing access (as described in this subsectionIII.H.1) and altering default invocations (as described in the followingsubsection III.H.2) with regard to each such Microsoft Middleware Product orNon-Microsoft Middleware Product and may offer the end-user a separate andunbiased choice of enabling or removing access and altering default configura-tions as to all Microsoft Middleware Products as a group or all Non-MicrosoftMiddleware Products as a group.

2. Allow end users (via an unbiased mechanism readily available from thedesktop or Start menu), OEMs (via standard OEM preinstallation kits), andNon-Microsoft Middleware Products (via a mechanism which may, atMicrosoft’s option, require confirmation from the end user in an unbiasedmanner) to designate a Non-Microsoft Middleware Product to be invoked inplace of that Microsoft Middleware Product (or vice versa) in any case wherethe Windows Operating System Product would otherwise launch the MicrosoftMiddleware Product in a separate Top-Level Window and display either (i) allof the user interface elements or (ii) the Trademark of the MicrosoftMiddleware Product.

Notwithstanding the foregoing Section III.H.2, the Windows Operating System

Product may invoke a Microsoft Middleware Product in any instance in which:

- 6 -

(a) that Microsoft Middleware Product would be invoked solely for use ininteroperating with a server maintained by Microsoft (outside thecontext of general Web browsing), or

(b) that designated Non-Microsoft Middleware Product fails to implementa reasonable technical requirement (e.g., a requirement to be able tohost a particular ActiveX control) that is necessary for valid technicalreasons to supply the end user with functionality consistent with aWindows Operating System Product, provided that the technicalreasons are described in a reasonably prompt manner to any ISV thatrequests them.

3. Ensure that a Windows Operating System Product does not (a) automaticallyalter an OEM’s configuration of icons, shortcuts or menu entries installed ordisplayed by the OEM pursuant to Section III.C of this Final Judgment withoutfirst seeking confirmation from the user and (b) seek such confirmation fromthe end user for an automatic (as opposed to user-initiated) alteration of theOEM’s configuration until 14 days after the initial boot up of a new PersonalComputer. Any such automatic alteration and confirmation shall be unbiasedwith respect to Microsoft Middleware Products and Non-MicrosoftMiddleware. Microsoft shall not alter the manner in which a WindowsOperating System Product automatically alters an OEM’s configuration oficons, shortcuts or menu entries other than in a new version of a WindowsOperating System Product.

Microsoft’s obligations under this Section III.H as to any new Windows Operating SystemProduct shall be determined based on the Microsoft Middleware Products which exist sevenmonths prior to the last beta test version (i.e., the one immediately preceding the first releasecandidate) of that Windows Operating System Product.

I. Microsoft shall offer to license to ISVs, IHVs, IAPs, ICPs, and OEMs any intellectualproperty rights owned or licensable by Microsoft that are required to exercise any of theoptions or alternatives expressly provided to them under this Final Judgment, provided that

1. all terms, including royalties or other payment of monetary consideration, arereasonable and non-discriminatory;

2. the scope of any such license (and the intellectual property rights licensedthereunder) need be no broader than is necessary to ensure that an ISV, IHV,IAP, ICP or OEM is able to exercise the options or alternatives expresslyprovided under this Final Judgment (e.g., an ISV’s, IHV’s, IAP’s, ICP’s andOEM’s option to promote Non-Microsoft Middleware shall not confer anyrights to any Microsoft intellectual property rights infringed by that Non-Microsoft Middleware);

3. an ISV’s, IHV’s, IAP’s, ICP’s, or OEM’s rights may be conditioned on its notassigning, transferring or sublicensing its rights under any license grantedunder this provision; and

- 7 -

4. the terms of any license granted under this section are in all respects consistentwith the express terms of this Final Judgment.

Beyond the express terms of any license granted by Microsoft pursuant to this section, thisFinal Judgment does not, directly or by implication, estoppel or otherwise, confer any rights,licenses, covenants or immunities with regard to any Microsoft intellectual property toanyone.

J. No provision of this Final Judgment shall:

1. Require Microsoft to document, disclose or license to third parties: (a) portionsof APIs or Documentation or portions or layers of Communications Protocolsthe disclosure of which would compromise the security of a particular installa-tion or group of installations of anti-piracy, anti-virus, software licensing,digital rights management, encryption or authentication systems, includingwithout limitation, keys, authorization tokens or enforcement criteria; or(b) any API, interface or other information related to any Microsoft product iflawfully directed not to do so by a governmental agency of competent juris-diction.

2. Prevent Microsoft from conditioning any license of any API, Documentationor Communications Protocol related to anti-piracy systems, anti-virus tech-nologies, license enforcement mechanisms, authentication/authorizationsecurity, or third party intellectual property protection mechanisms of anyMicrosoft product to any person or entity on the requirement that the licensee:(a) has no history of software counterfeiting or piracy or willful violation ofintellectual property rights, (b) has a reasonable business need for the API,Documentation or Communications Protocol for a planned or shipping pro-duct, (c) meets reasonable, objective standards established by Microsoft forcertifying the authenticity and viability of its business, (d) agrees to submit, atits own expense, any computer program using such APIs, Documentation orCommunication Protocols to third-party verification, approved by Microsoft,to test for and ensure verification and compliance with Microsoft specificationsfor use of the API or interface, which specifications shall be related to properoperation and integrity of the systems and mechanisms identified in thisparagraph.

IV. Compliance and Enforcement Procedures

A. Enforcement Authority

1. The Plaintiffs shall have exclusive responsibility for enforcing this FinalJudgment. Without in any way limiting the sovereign enforcement authority ofeach of the plaintiff States, the plaintiff States shall form a committee tocoordinate their enforcement of this Final Judgment. A plaintiff State shalltake no action to enforce this Final Judgment without first consulting with theUnited States and with the plaintiff States’ enforcement committee.

2. To determine and enforce compliance with this Final Judgment, dulyauthorized representatives of the United States and the plaintiff States, on

- 8 -

reasonable notice to Microsoft and subject to any lawful privilege, shall bepermitted the following:

a. Access during normal office hours to inspect any and all source code,books, ledgers, accounts, correspondence, memoranda and otherdocuments and records in the possession, custody, or control ofMicrosoft, which may have counsel present, regarding any matterscontained in this Final Judgment.

b. Subject to the reasonable convenience of Microsoft and withoutrestraint or interference from it, to interview, informally or on therecord, officers, employees, or agents of Microsoft, who may havecounsel present, regarding any matters contained in this FinalJudgment.

c. Upon written request of the United States or a duly designatedrepresentative of a plaintiff State, on reasonable notice given toMicrosoft, Microsoft shall submit such written reports under oath asrequested regarding any matters contained in this Final Judgment.

Individual plaintiff States will consult with the plaintiff States’ enforcementcommittee to minimize the duplication and burden of the exercise of theforegoing powers, where practicable.

3. The Plaintiffs shall not disclose any information or documents obtained fromMicrosoft under this Final Judgment except for the purpose of securingcompliance with this Final Judgment, in a legal proceeding to which one ormore of the Plaintiffs is a party, or as otherwise required by law; provided thatthe relevant Plaintiff(s) must provide ten days’ advance notice to Microsoftbefore disclosing in any legal proceeding (other than a grand jury proceeding)to which Microsoft is not a party any information or documents provided byMicrosoft pursuant to this Final Judgment which Microsoft has identified inwriting as material as to which a claim of protection may be asserted underRule 26(c)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

4. The Plaintiffs shall have the authority to seek such orders as are necessary fromthe Court to enforce this Final Judgment, provided, however, that the Plaintiffsshall afford Microsoft a reasonable opportunity to cure alleged violations ofSections III.C, III.D, III.E and III.H, provided further that any action byMicrosoft to cure any such violation shall not be a defense to enforcement withrespect to any knowing, willful or systematic violations.

B. Appointment of a Technical Committee

1. Within 30 days of entry of this Final Judgment, the parties shall create andrecommend to the Court for its appointment a three-person TechnicalCommittee (“TC”) to assist in enforcement of and compliance with this FinalJudgment.

2. The TC members shall be experts in software design and programming. NoTC member shall have a conflict of interest that could prevent him or her from

- 9 -

performing his or her duties under this Final Judgment in a fair and unbiasedmanner. Without limitation to the foregoing, no TC member (absent the agree-ment of both parties):

a. shall have been employed in any capacity by Microsoft or anycompetitor to Microsoft within the past year, nor shall she or he be soemployed during his or her term on the TC;

b. shall have been retained as a consulting or testifying expert by anyperson in this action or in any other action adverse to or on behalf ofMicrosoft; or

c. shall perform any other work for Microsoft or any competitor ofMicrosoft for two years after the expiration of the term of his or herservice on the TC.

3. Within 7 days of entry of this Final Judgment, the Plaintiffs as a group andMicrosoft shall each select one member of the TC, and those two membersshall then select the third member. The selection and approval process shallproceed as follows.

a. As soon as practicable after submission of this Final Judgment to theCourt, the Plaintiffs as a group and Microsoft shall each identify to theother the individual it proposes to select as its designee to the TC. ThePlaintiffs and Microsoft shall not object to each other’s selection on anyground other than failure to satisfy the requirements of Section IV.B.2above. Any such objection shall be made within ten business days ofthe receipt of notification of selection.

b. The Plaintiffs shall apply to the Court for appointment of the personsselected by the Plaintiffs and Microsoft pursuant to Section IV.B.3.aabove. Any objections to the eligibility of a selected person that theparties have failed to resolve between themselves shall be decided bythe Court based solely on the requirements stated in Section IV.B.2above.

c. As soon as practical after their appointment by the Court, the twomembers of the TC selected by the Plaintiffs and Microsoft (the“Standing Committee Members”) shall identify to the Plaintiffs andMicrosoft the person that they in turn propose to select as the thirdmember of the TC. The Plaintiffs and Microsoft shall not object to thisselection on any grounds other than failure to satisfy the requirementsof Section IV.B.2 above. Any such objection shall be made within tenbusiness days of the receipt of notification of the selection and shall beserved on the other party as well as on the Standing CommitteeMembers.

d. The Plaintiffs shall apply to the Court for appointment of the personselected by the Standing Committee Members. If the StandingCommittee Members cannot agree on a third member of the TC, the

- 10 -

third member shall be appointed by the Court. Any objection byMicrosoft or the Plaintiffs to the eligibility of the person selected by theStanding Committee Members which the parties have failed to resolveamong themselves shall also be decided by the Court based on therequirements stated in Section IV.B.2 above.

4. Each TC member shall serve for an initial term of 30 months. At the end of aTC member’s initial 30-month term, the party that originally selected him orher may, in its sole discretion, either request re-appointment by the Court to asecond 30-month term or replace the TC member in the same manner asprovided for in Section IV.B.3.a above. In the case of the third member of theTC, that member shall be re-appointed or replaced in the manner provided inSection IV.B.3.c above.

5. If the United States determines that a member of the TC has failed to actdiligently and consistently with the purposes of this Final Judgment, or if amember of the TC resigns, or for any other reason ceases to serve in his or hercapacity as a member of the TC, the person or persons that originally selectedthe TC member shall select a replacement member in the same manner asprovided for in Section IV.B.3.

6. Promptly after appointment of the TC by the Court, the United States shallenter into a Technical Committee services agreement (“TC Services Agree-ment”) with each TC member that grants the rights, powers and authoritiesnecessary to permit the TC to perform its duties under this Final Judgment. Microsoft shall indemnify each TC member and hold him or her harmlessagainst any losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expenses arising out of, or inconnection with, the performance of the TC’s duties, except to the extent thatsuch liabilities, losses, damages, claims, or expenses result from misfeasance,gross negligence, willful or wanton acts, or bad faith by the TC member. TheTC Services Agreements shall include the following.

a. The TC members shall serve, without bond or other security, at the costand expense of Microsoft on such terms and conditions as the Plaintiffsapprove, including the payment of reasonable fees and expenses.

b. The TC Services Agreement shall provide that each member of the TCshall comply with the limitations provided for in Section IV.B.2 above.

7. Microsoft shall provide the TC with a permanent office, telephone, and otheroffice support facilities at Microsoft’s corporate campus in Redmond,Washington. Microsoft shall also, upon reasonable advance notice from theTC, provide the TC with reasonable access to available office space, telephone,and other office support facilities at any other Microsoft facility identified bythe TC.

8. The TC shall have the following powers and duties:

a. The TC shall have the power and authority to monitor Microsoft’scompliance with its obligations under this final judgment.

- 11 -

b. The TC may, on reasonable notice to Microsoft:

(i) interview, either informally or on the record, any Microsoftpersonnel, who may have counsel present; any such interview tobe subject to the reasonable convenience of such personnel andwithout restraint or interference by Microsoft;

(ii) inspect and copy any document in the possession, custody orcontrol of Microsoft personnel;

(iii) obtain reasonable access to any systems or equipment to whichMicrosoft personnel have access;

(iv) obtain access to, and inspect, any physical facility, building orother premises to which Microsoft personnel have access; and

(v) require Microsoft personnel to provide compilations ofdocuments, data and other information, and to submit reports tothe TC containing such material, in such form as the TC mayreasonably direct.

c. The TC shall have access to Microsoft’s source code, subject to theterms of Microsoft’s standard source code Confidentiality Agreement,as approved by the Plaintiffs and to be agreed to by the TC memberspursuant to Section IV.B.9 below, and by any staff or consultants whomay have access to the source code. The TC may study, interrogateand interact with the source code in order to perform its functions andduties, including the handling of complaints and other inquiries fromnon-parties.

d. The TC shall receive complaints from the Compliance Officer, thirdparties or the Plaintiffs and handle them in the manner specified inSection IV.D below.

e. The TC shall report in writing to the Plaintiffs every six months untilexpiration of this Final Judgment the actions it has undertaken inperforming its duties pursuant to this Final Judgment, including theidentification of each business practice reviewed and any recommenda-tions made by the TC.

f. Regardless of when reports are due, when the TC has reason to believe that there may have been a failure by Microsoft to comply with any term of this Final Judgment, the TC shall immediately notify the Plaintiffs in writing setting forth the relevant details.

g. TC members may communicate with non-parties about how theircomplaints or inquiries might be resolved with Microsoft, so long asthe confidentiality of information obtained from Microsoft ismaintained.

h. The TC may hire at the cost and expense of Microsoft, with prior noticeto Microsoft and subject to approval by the Plaintiffs, such staff orconsultants (all of whom must meet the qualifications of Section

- 12 -

IV.B.2) as are reasonably necessary for the TC to carry out its dutiesand responsibilities under this Final Judgment. The compensation ofany person retained by the TC shall be based on reasonable andcustomary terms commensurate with the individual’s experience andresponsibilities.

i. The TC shall account for all reasonable expenses incurred, including agreed upon fees for the TC members’ services, subject to the approval of the Plaintiffs. Microsoft may, on application to the Court, object to the reasonableness of any such fees or other expenses. On any such application: (a) the burden shall be on Microsoft to demonstrate unreasonableness; and (b) the TC member(s) shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred on such application (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs), regardless of the Court’s disposition of suchapplication, unless the Court shall expressly find that the TC’s opposition to the application was without substantial justification.

9. Each TC member, and any consultants or staff hired by the TC, shall sign aconfidentiality agreement prohibiting disclosure of any information obtained inthe course of performing his or her duties as a member of the TC or as a personassisting the TC to anyone other than Microsoft, the Plaintiffs, or the Court. All information gathered by the TC in connection with this Final Judgment andany report and recommendations prepared by the TC shall be treated as HighlyConfidential under the Protective Order in this case, and shall not be disclosedto any person other than Microsoft and the Plaintiffs except as allowed by theProtective Order entered in the Action or by further order of this Court.

10. No member of the TC shall make any public statements relating to the TC’sactivities.

C. Appointment of a Microsoft Internal Compliance Officer

1. Microsoft shall designate, within 30 days of entry of this Final Judgment, aninternal Compliance Officer who shall be an employee of Microsoft withresponsibility for administering Microsoft’s antitrust compliance program andhelping to ensure compliance with this Final Judgment.

2. The Compliance Officer shall supervise the review of Microsoft’s activities toensure that they comply with this Final Judgment. He or she may be assistedby other employees of Microsoft.

3. The Compliance Officer shall be responsible for performing the followingactivities:

a. within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment, distributing a copy ofthe Final Judgment to all officers and directors of Microsoft;

b. promptly distributing a copy of this Final Judgment to any person whosucceeds to a position described in Section IV.C.3.a above;

- 13 -

c. ensuring that those persons designated in Section IV.C.3.a above areannually briefed on the meaning and requirements of this FinalJudgment and the U.S. antitrust laws and advising them thatMicrosoft’s legal advisors are available to confer with them regardingany question concerning compliance with this Final Judgment or underthe U.S. antitrust laws;

d. obtaining from each person designated in Section IV.C.3.a above anannual written certification that he or she: (i) has read and agrees toabide by the terms of this Final Judgment; and (ii) has been advised andunderstands that his or her failure to comply with this Final Judgmentmay result in a finding of contempt of court;

e. maintaining a record of all persons to whom a copy of this FinalJudgment has been distributed and from whom the certificationdescribed in Section IV.C.3.d above has been obtained;

f. establishing and maintaining the website provided for in SectionIV.D.3.b below.

g. receiving complaints from third parties, the TC and the Plaintiffsconcerning Microsoft’s compliance with this Final Judgment andfollowing the appropriate procedures set forth in Section IV.D below;and

h. maintaining a record of all complaints received and action taken byMicrosoft with respect to each such complaint.

D. Voluntary Dispute Resolution

1. Third parties may submit complaints concerning Microsoft’s compliance withthis Final Judgment to the Plaintiffs, the TC or the Compliance Officer.

2. In order to enhance the ability of the Plaintiffs to enforce compliance with thisFinal Judgment, and to advance the parties’ joint interest and the public interestin prompt resolution of issues and disputes, the parties have agreed that the TCand the Compliance Officer shall have the following additional responsibilities.

3. Submissions to the Compliance Officer.

a. Third parties, the TC, or the Plaintiffs in their discretion may submit tothe Compliance Officer any complaints concerning Microsoft’scompliance with this Final Judgment. Without in any way limiting itsauthority to take any other action to enforce this Final Judgment, thePlaintiffs may submit complaints related to Sections III.C, III.D, III.Eand III.H to the Compliance Officer whenever doing so would beconsistent with the public interest.

b. To facilitate the communication of complaints and inquiries by thirdparties, the Compliance Officer shall place on Microsoft’s Internetwebsite, in a manner acceptable to the Plaintiffs, the procedures forsubmitting complaints. To encourage whenever possible the informal

- 14 -

resolution of complaints and inquiries, the website shall provide amechanism for communicating complaints and inquiries to theCompliance Officer.

c. Microsoft shall have 30 days after receiving a complaint to attempt toresolve it or reject it, and will then promptly advise the TC of the natureof the complaint and its disposition.

4. Submissions to the TC.

a. The Compliance Officer, third parties or the Plaintiffs in theirdiscretion may submit to the TC any complaints concerningMicrosoft’s compliance with this Final Judgment.

b. The TC shall investigate complaints received and will consult with thePlaintiffs regarding its investigation. At least once during its investi-gation, and more often when it may help resolve complaints informally,the TC shall meet with the Compliance Officer to allow Microsoft torespond to the substance of the complaint and to determine whether thecomplaint can be resolved without further proceedings.

c. If the TC concludes that a complaint is meritorious, it shall adviseMicrosoft and the Plaintiffs of its conclusion and its proposal for cure.

d. No work product, findings or recommendations by the TC may beadmitted in any enforcement proceeding before the Court for anypurpose, and no member of the TC shall testify by deposition, in courtor before any other tribunal regarding any matter related to this FinalJudgment.

e. The TC may preserve the anonymity of any third party complainantwhere it deems it appropriate to do so upon the request of the Plaintiffsor the third party, or in its discretion.

V. Termination

A. Unless this Court grants an extension, this Final Judgment will expire on the fifthanniversary of the date it is entered by the Court.

B. In any enforcement proceeding in which the Court has found that Microsoft hasengaged in a pattern of willful and systematic violations, the Plaintiffs may apply tothe Court for a one-time extension of this Final Judgment of up to two years, togetherwith such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

VI. Definitions

A. “API” means application programming interface, including any interface thatMicrosoft is obligated to disclose pursuant to III.D.

- 15 -

B. “Communications Protocol” means the set of rules for information exchange to

accomplish predefined tasks between a Windows Operating System Product and aserver operating system product connected via a network, including, but not limited to,a local area network, a wide area network or the Internet. These rules govern theformat, semantics, timing, sequencing, and error control of messages exchanged over anetwork.

C. “Consideration” means any monetary payment or the provision of preferential

licensing terms; technical, marketing, and sales support; enabling programs; productinformation; information about future plans; developer support; hardware or softwarecertification or approval; or permission to display trademarks, icons or logos.

D. “Covered OEMs” means the 20 OEMs with the highest worldwide volume of licenses

of Windows Operating System Products reported to Microsoft in Microsoft’s fiscalyear preceding the effective date of the Final Judgment. The OEMs that fall withinthis definition of Covered OEMs shall be recomputed by Microsoft as soon aspracticable after the close of each of Microsoft’s fiscal years.

E. “Documentation” means all information regarding the identification and means of

using APIs that a person of ordinary skill in the art requires to make effective use ofthose APIs. Such information shall be of the sort and to the level of specificity,precision and detail that Microsoft customarily provides for APIs it documents in theMicrosoft Developer Network (“MSDN”).

F. “IAP” means an Internet access provider that provides consumers with a connection tothe Internet, with or without its own proprietary content.

G. “ICP” means an Internet content provider that provides content to users of the Internetby maintaining Web sites.

H. “IHV” means an independent hardware vendor that develops hardware to be includedin or used with a Personal Computer running a Windows Operating System Product.

I. “ISV” means an entity other than Microsoft that is engaged in the development ormarketing of software products.

J. “Microsoft Middleware” means software code that

1. Microsoft distributes separately from a Windows Operating System Product toupdate that Windows Operating System Product;

2. is Trademarked or is marketed by Microsoft as a major version of anyMicrosoft Middleware Product defined in section VI.K.1; and

3. provides the same or substantially similar functionality as a MicrosoftMiddleware Product.

Microsoft Middleware shall include at least the software code that controls most or allof the user interface elements of that Microsoft Middleware.

- 16 -

Software code described as part of, and distributed separately to update, a MicrosoftMiddleware Product shall not be deemed Microsoft Middleware unless identified as anew major version of that Microsoft Middleware Product. A major version shall beidentified by a whole number or by a number with just a single digit to the right of thedecimal point.

K. “Microsoft Middleware Product” means

1. the functionality provided by Internet Explorer, Microsoft’s Java VirtualMachine, Windows Media Player, Windows Messenger, Outlook Express andtheir successors in a Windows Operating System Product, and

2. for any functionality that is first licensed, distributed or sold by Microsoft afterthe entry of this Final Judgment and that is part of any Windows OperatingSystem Product

a. Internet browsers, email client software, networked audio/video clientsoftware, instant messaging software or

b. functionality provided by Microsoft software that —

i. is, or in the year preceding the commercial release of any newWindows Operating System Product was, distributed separatelyby Microsoft (or by an entity acquired by Microsoft) from aWindows Operating System Product;

ii. is similar to the functionality provided by a Non-MicrosoftMiddleware Product; and

iii. is Trademarked.

Functionality that Microsoft describes or markets as being part of a MicrosoftMiddleware Product (such as a service pack, upgrade, or bug fix for Internet Explorer),or that is a version of a Microsoft Middleware Product (such as Internet Explorer 5.5),shall be considered to be part of that Microsoft Middleware Product.

L. “Microsoft Platform Software” means (i) a Windows Operating System Product and/or(ii) a Microsoft Middleware Product.

M. “Non-Microsoft Middleware” means a non-Microsoft software product running on aWindows Operating System Product that exposes a range of functionality to ISVsthrough published APIs, and that could, if ported to or made interoperable with, a non-Microsoft Operating System, thereby make it easier for applications that rely in wholeor in part on the functionality supplied by that software product to be ported to or runon that non-Microsoft Operating System.

N. “Non-Microsoft Middleware Product” means a non-Microsoft software product run-ning on a Windows Operating System Product (i) that exposes a range of functionalityto ISVs through published APIs, and that could, if ported to or made interoperablewith, a non-Microsoft Operating System, thereby make it easier for applications thatrely in whole or in part on the functionality supplied by that software product to be

- 17 -

ported to or run on that non-Microsoft Operating System, and (ii) of which at least onemillion copies were distributed in the United States within the previous year.

O. “OEM” means an original equipment manufacturer of Personal Computers that is alicensee of a Windows Operating System Product.

P. “Operating System” means the software code that, inter alia, (i) controls the allocationand usage of hardware resources (such as the microprocessor and various peripheraldevices) of a Personal Computer, (ii) provides a platform for developing applicationsby exposing functionality to ISVs through APIs, and (iii) supplies a user interface thatenables users to access functionality of the operating system and in which they can runapplications.

Q. “Personal Computer” means any computer configured so that its primary purpose isfor use by one person at a time, that uses a video display and keyboard (whether or notthat video display and keyboard is included) and that contains an Intel x86 compatible(or successor) microprocessor. Servers, television set top boxes, handheld computers,game consoles, telephones, pagers, and personal digital assistants are examples ofproducts that are not Personal Computers within the meaning of this definition.

R. “Timely Manner” means at the time Microsoft first releases a beta test version of aWindows Operating System Product that is made available via an MSDN subscriptionoffering or of which 150,000 or more beta copies are distributed.

S. “Top-Level Window” means a window displayed by a Windows Operating SystemProduct that (a) has its own window controls, such as move, resize, close, minimize,and maximize, (b) can contain sub-windows, and (c) contains user interface elementsunder the control of at least one independent process.

T. “Trademarked” means distributed in commerce and identified as distributed by a nameother than Microsoft® or Windows® that Microsoft has claimed as a trademark orservice mark by (i) marking the name with trademark notices, such as ® or ™, inconnection with a product distributed in the United States; (ii) filing an application fortrademark protection for the name in the United States Patent and Trademark Office;or (iii) asserting the name as a trademark in the United States in a demand letter orlawsuit. Any product distributed under descriptive or generic terms or a namecomprised of the Microsoft® or Windows® trademarks together with descriptive orgeneric terms shall not be Trademarked as that term is used in this Final Judgment. Microsoft hereby disclaims any trademark rights in such descriptive or generic termsapart from the Microsoft® or Windows® trademarks, and hereby abandons any suchrights that it may acquire in the future.

U. “Windows Operating System Product” means the software code (as opposed to sourcecode) distributed commercially by Microsoft for use with Personal Computers asWindows 2000 Professional, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Professional, andsuccessors to the foregoing, including the Personal Computer versions of the productscurrently code named “Longhorn” and “Blackcomb” and their successors, includingupgrades, bug fixes, service packs, etc. The software code that comprises a WindowsOperating System Product shall be determined by Microsoft in its sole discretion.

- 18 -

VII. Further Elements

Jurisdiction is retained by this Court over this action and the parties thereto for the purpose ofenabling either of the parties thereto to apply to this Court at any time for further orders anddirections as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out or construe this Final Judgment, tomodify or terminate any of its provisions, to enforce compliance, and to punish violations ofits provisions.

VIII. Third Party Rights

Nothing in this Final Judgment is intended to confer upon any other persons any rights orremedies of any nature whatsoever hereunder or by reason of this Final Judgment.