us system

19
 U.S. Banking System Regulatory Framework Integrity. Objectivity. Performance. New York State Society of CP As Banking Committee  August 10, 2010

Upload: harpott-ghanta

Post on 08-Oct-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

the fed

TRANSCRIPT

  • U.S. Banking System

    Regulatory Framework

    Integrity. Objectivity. Performance.

    New York State Society of CPAs Banking Committee

    August 10, 2010

  • Financial Regulatory Reform

    Clarifying Roles of Bank Regulators

    Proposed Rule Changes Impacting Banks

    Non Bank Regulatory Oversight

    CAMELS Rating Overview

    Q & A

    Agenda

  • Financial Regulatory Reform

    REG REFORM

    House Bill Wall Street Reform

    & Consumer Protection Act

    Senate Bill Restoring

    American Financial Stability Act

  • Regulatory Body Anticipated Lines of Responsibility

    Federal Reserve

    Regulates bank and thrift holding companies with assets over $50 billion

    Vice-Chair responsible for supervision and reports to Congress semi-annually

    FDIC Regulates state banks and thrifts of all sizes Regulates bank holding companies of state banks with

    assets below $50 billion

    OCC

    Regulates national banks and Federal thrifts of all sizes Regulates holding companies of national banks and Federal

    thrifts with assets below $50 billion OTS is eliminated

    State Banking Departments

    Regulates state banks State banking system governs most of community banks

    Clarifying Roles of Primary Bank Regulators

  • CAMELS rating for Domestic US Banks

    ROCA rating for Foreign Branches & Agencies

    Assign Ratings of 1 to 5

    Confidential Rating

    Regulatory Supervisory Approach

  • C Capital Adequacy

    A Asset Quality

    M Management

    E Earnings

    L Liquidity

    S Sensitivity to Market Risk

    CAMELS Rating

  • R Risk Management

    O Ops Controls

    C Compliance

    A Asset Quality

    ROCA Rating

  • Capital Implications

    Bank Tax

    Volker Rule

    Derivatives Transparency

    Corporate Governance

    Executive Compensation and Accountability

    Proposed Rule Changes Impacting Banks

  • Capital Implications - Capital Adequacy Ratios

    Capital Adequacy Ratios

    For Capital AdequacyPurposes

    To Be Well Capitalized

    Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)

    8% 10%

    Tier 1 Capital(To Risk Weighted Assets)

    4% 6%

    Tier 1 Leverage Capital (To Average Assets)

    4% 5%

    Currently Applicable to all Banks and Proposed to apply to all Bank Holding Companies Grandfathering and Transition

    Periods Expected

    9

  • Trust Preferred and Hybrid Securities may only be

    included in Tier 2 Capital

    TARP Preferred securities may only be included in

    Tier 2 Capital

    Capital Implications - Tier I Capital Impact

  • Risk Management Committees at Public

    Companies required for:

    Publically traded bank holding companies with

    total consolidated assets $10 billion

    Requires risk committees for systemically

    important publically traded bank holding

    companies

    Corporate Governance

  • Enhancements Proposed Provisions

    Shareholders Voice

    Granted a non-binding vote on executive pay Proxy access to nominate directors in certain cases Directors must win majority vote in uncontested proxy

    elections

    Claw-back Provisions Companies will be required to claw-back executive pay if based on inaccurate financials

    Clearer Disclosures

    SEC to require companies to disclosures including charts comparing executive compensation with stock performance over a 5 year period

    Independent

    Compensation

    Committees

    Listed Companies to have compensation committees sourced with only independent directors that have authority to hire compensation consultants

    Executive Compensation and Accountability

  • Original proposal has been Watered Down

    Would have eliminated proprietary trading for the any systemically important bank holding company as well as investments in hedge funds and private equity vehicles

    Amended Proposal Limits Bank Holding Companies ability to Invest in Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

    3% of the hedge fund and private equity vehicles capital at the individual investment level

    3% of Tier 1 capital for all aggregate investments in hedge funds and private equity vehicles

    (Paul) Volker Rule

  • Grants SEC and CFTC authority to regulate OTC derivatives

    Requires data collection and publication through clearing houses or swap repositories

    Requires central clearing and exchange trading for derivatives that can be cleared

    Requires margin for OTC derivatives not eligible for centralized clearing

    Derivatives Transparency

  • Original House Bill would have taxed large Banks and Hedge Funds ~ $20b

    In lieu of Bank Tax Large Banks with more than $10b in assets will pay a higher

    FDIC assessment on insured deposits proposed 1.35% vs. 1.15% current

    assessment

    Bank Tax

  • 9 member council of Federal financial regulators and an independent member will

    be chaired by the Treasury Secretary and

    made up of regulators including: Fed, SEC,

    CFTC, OCC, FDIC, FHFA and the new

    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

    Council will have ability to subject large non-banks financial companies to be regulated by

    the Federal Reserve

    Non-Bank Regulatory Oversight

  • C Capital Adequacy

    A Asset Quality

    M Management

    E Earnings

    L Liquidity

    S Sensitivity to Market Risk

    CAMELS RATING

  • CAMELS RATING OVERVIEW

    SENSITIVITY TO

    MARKET RISK

    EARNINGS

    LIQUIDITY

    Quality of Earnings

    Trends

    Peer Group Comparison

    Funding Sources

    Core Deposits

    Asset Liability Management

    Interest Rate Risk Stress Testing

    Risk Management Integrity

    Adequate Resources

    TOTAL CAPITAL 8% / 10%

    TIER 1 Capital 4% / 6%

    LEVERAGE RATI0 4% / 5%ASSET QUALITY

    Investment Portfolio Quality

    Loan Portfolio Quality

    Adequacy of ALLL

    CAMELS

    CAPITAL ADEQUACY

    Corporate Governance

    Vendor Due Diligence

    Internal Audit Function

    Independent Loan Review Function

    Segregation of Duties

    MANAGEMENT

  • 19

    THANK YOU

    Phil Musacchio

    [email protected]

    1.212.375.6605 (o)

    Q & A