u.s. postal service competition report fiscal year 2016 competition report fiscal year 2016 page 4...

U.S. Postal Service Competition Report Fiscal Year 2016

USPS Competition Report Fiscal Year 2016

This page intentionally left blank.

USPS Competition Report Fiscal Report 2016

PROMOTING COMPETITION AND BEST VALUE

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

I. Results of FY2016 Competition

II. CA Role

III. Contracting Authority/Responsibility, Systems, and Contracting Data

IV. CA Reviews of Noncompetitive Purchase Requests

V. Supply Management Strategies and Tools Used to Promote Competition

VI. Barriers to Competition in FY2016

VII. Summary

APPENDICES:

Appendix A: CAMS Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications

Appendix B: TCSS Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications

Appendix C: eFMS Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications

Appendix D: FPDS-NG Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications

Appendix E: Noncompetitive Purchases — Management Instruction

Appendix F: Contracting Data Definitions


I. Results of FY2016 Competition

The Competition Report outlines the Postal Service®’s commitment towards promoting competition and obtaining best value. The Postal Service promotes competition by communicating the benefits of competition throughout the organization and providing reports that help to improve contract planning and highlight opportunities for competition.

The Competition Report summarizes the Postal Service’s annual contract commitments and highlights noncompetitive purchases valued at $1 million (M) or greater that were reviewed by the Competition Advocate (CA). The report also identifies strategies, tools and programs processes that were executed to improve contract planning and promote competition.

In FY2016, the Postal Service committed over $5.9 billion (B) in contracting actions and awarded $4.5B or 76.3% of those actions competitively. Annual contract commitments decreased by $4B in FY16 compared to FY15, largely due to a significant number of transportation and mail and operational equipment contracts that were issued in FY16. In FY2015, the Postal Service committed over $9.9B in contracting actions and awarded $8.0B or 80.3% of those actions competitively.

These results compared favorably against the statistics reported via the Federal Procurement Data System – Next Generation (FPDS-NG). In FY2016, the federal government reported that 63.2% of the total contracting actions were awarded competitively. Excluding the Department of Defense (DOD) contracting data, the percentage of competitive contracts reported for all other federal agencies is 81.0%

In FY2016, the CA reviewed 82 Noncompetitive Purchase Requests (NPRs), with an estimated total committed value of $3.2B over a period of five years. In comparison, the CA reviewed 84 NPRs in FY2015 with an estimated committed value of $1.4B over a period of five years.

These results represent a significant increase in the total dollar value of NPRs submitted to the CA for review in FY2016 compared to FY2015. In FY16, the CA reviewed 15 large NPR’s with an estimated value of $2.6B over a five year period. The majority of these NPR’s were issued for contract extensions against contracts that were initially competed and required to provide continued support for large infrastructure programs. Given the size, scale and complexity of Postal Service operations, opportunities for subsequent competition can be cost prohibitive or not in the best interests of the Postal Service. Additional information about these large NPR’s are explained later in this report.

*The Postal Services competitive coding and practices are slightly different from FPDS-NG.


II. CA Role

The CA is responsible for promoting competition in the Postal Service. The CA must maintain a program that includes identifying, tracking, and following up on actions to remove barriers to competition. The CA is responsible for the following:

a. Challenging barriers to the competition of Postal Service requirements.

b. Assisting purchase/supply chain management teams in the development of effective Supply Chain Management (SCM) solutions and obtaining best value.

c. Providing independent advice to contracting officers (COs) regarding proposed noncompetitive purchases of $1M or greater.

d. Producing an annual report on noncompetitive purchasing activity.

The CA is appointed by the vice president, Supply Management (SM) and the CA’s role and responsibilities are defined in Section 2-10, Determine Extent of Competition, of the Postal Service’s Supplying Principles and Practices (SPs and Ps) and Management Instruction (MI) SP S2-2011-1, Noncompetitive Purchases. The complete SPs and Ps can be found internally on the USPS® intranet site at: http://blue.usps.gov/policy/ and externally at: http://about.usps.com/manuals/spp/html/welcome.htm.

The MI is available internally on the Postal Service intranet site at: http://blue.usps.gov/cpim/ftp/manage/sps2111.pdf. See Appendix E for a copy of the MI.

http://blue.usps.gov/policy/

http://about.usps.com/manuals/spp/html/welcome.htm

http://blue.usps.gov/cpim/ftp/manage/sps2111.pdf


III. Contracting Authority/Responsibility, Systems, and Contracting

Data

Contracting Authority/Responsibility

The authority and responsibility for all procurement contracting actions within the Postal Service (with the exception of real estate and related services contracts) are consolidated within the SM organization. Real estate contracting authority is delegated to the vice president, Facilities.

As provided in Handbook AS-709, Local Buying and Purchase Card Policy and Procedures, local purchases of up to $10 thousand (K) can be executed by individuals through delegated local buying authority. Local purchases and contract actions valued at less than $10K are not subject to the competition requirements. Table 1 provides the approval levels for noncompetitive contract actions. Once an NPR is signed, a CO can sign within his or her delegated authority.

Table 1: Level of SM Approval for Non-Competitive Contract Actions

Estimated values of proposed contract action Approval by:

$10K to $250K CO/Manager

>$250K to $10M (excluding Professional & Consultant Services >$1M) Portfolio Manager

$1 million or greater if Professional & Consultant Services Vice President

$10 million or greater Vice President

Contracting Systems and Capture of Competitive/Noncompetitive Contract Action Classifications

Postal Service contracting actions are captured within one of three contracting systems: CAMS, TCSS, and eFMS. A contract action is defined as a new contract, delivery order, task order, work order, modification to, or termination of, a contract. To promote data consistency across the contracting systems, the same competitive classification codes are maintained in all three contracting systems.

Contract Authoring and Management System (CAMS)

CAMS is a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) system that supports the purchase of supplies, services, equipment, and mail transportation (excluding surface transportation). Contracting actions are coded using the following competition classification codes:

a. Below Competitive Threshold (BCT) (less than $10K).

b. Competitive.

c. Competitive — Simplified Purchasing.

d. Noncompetitive — Compelling Business Interests.

e. Noncompetitive — Industry Structure or Practice.

f. Noncompetitive — Sole Source.

g. Noncompetitive — Superior Performance.

h. Ordering Agreements — Comp Code Not Applicable.

i. Required Source — Policy/Legally Mandated.

j. Required Source — Regulated Utility.


k. Unauthorized Contractual Commitments.

For purposes of this report, the BCT actions are excluded, because they are exempt from the competition requirements. All other classifications other than competitive are considered noncompetitive.

From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 7,274 contract actions executed equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) with commitments totaling $4.5B in CAMS. The commitment value of competitive contracting actions in CAMS equaled $3.1B or 69.1% of total CAMS contract actions. The number of competitive contracting actions totaled 5,230 or 72.3% of total contracting actions in CAMS. See Appendix A for more details related to CAMS contract actions.

Transportation Contract Support System (TCSS)

TCSS is a custom-built Postal Service system. TCSS is used to manage highway transportation contracts and payment processes. It supports the award of new contracts, modification to contracts, and renewal of contracts. Renewals of contracts are considered outside the scope of the competitive requirements because Title 39, Chapter 50, Section 5005, establishes that contracts may be renewed at the existing rate by mutual agreement between the contractor or subcontractor and the Postal Service. The renewal business process requires the comparison of the existing rate to comparable contract rates and to proceed with the renewal only when the rates are competitive with similar contracts. These renewals are not included in the competitive/noncompetitive reporting due to the Title 39 requirements.

From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 1,072 contract actions (less renewals) executed equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) in TCSS with commitments totaling $808.7M. The commitment value of competitive contracting actions equaled $807.5M or 99.8% of total contract actions. The number of competitive contracting actions totaled 1,069 or 99.7% of total contracting actions. The committed values of the contracts were calculated by multiplying the annual value of the contract by the contract term because TCSS only captures the annual value of the contract to calculate payments. See Appendix B for more details related to the TCSS contract actions.

Note: From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 2,123 renewal contract actions executed equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) in TCSS with commitments totaling $1.8B. These actions are not included in the competitive/noncompetitive classification but are included here for general information.

Facilities Management System (eFMS)

eFMS is a custom-built Postal Service system. eFMS is used to manage work orders, contracts, modifications and payments for facility construction, repair, and alteration contracts, along with real estate contracts. As noted above, contracting authority for real estate contracts has been delegated by the Postmaster General to the vice president, Facilities, and therefore such activity, is not within the scope of this report. Facility construction, repair, and alteration contracts are managed within SM.

From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 4,555 contract actions executed equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) in eFMS with commitments totaling $575.7M. The commitment value of competitive contracting actions equaled $570.5M or 99.1%


of total contract actions. The number of competitive contracting actions equaled 4,508 or 99.0% of total contracting actions.

See Appendix C for more details related to eFMS contract actions.

Summary of Contracting Actions

Table 2 provides the total commitments and contracting actions across the three contract management systems for the October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 reporting period.

This report does not include Highway Contract Renewals (HCRs) reported in the TCSS contracting system.

Sixty-six federal departments reported contract actions and commitments via the FPDS-NG and classified them as competitive or noncompetitive during the same reporting period as the Postal Service. This information is available via an annual Federal Procurement Data System Next Generation CA report. For the period spanning October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, the FPDS-NG CA report identified $431.4B in contract commitments of which 63.2% were awarded competitively. This compares to approximately $5.9B in contract commitments reported by the Postal Service, of which 76.3% were awarded competitively.

See Appendix D for more details related to the FPDS-NG CA report.

System

Competitive/Noncompet

itive Classification Committed $

# of Contract

Actions

% of Total

Committed $

% of Total

Contract

Actions

CAMS Competitive $3,096,013,233 5,230 52.8% 40.5%

eFMS Competitive $570,505,762 4,508 9.7% 34.9%

TCSS Competitive $807,459,134 1,069 13.8% 8.3%

Competitive Total $4,473,978,129 10,807 76.3% 83.8%

CAMS Noncompetitive $1,386,623,546 2,044 23.6% 15.8%

eFMS Noncompetitive $5,174,468 47 0.1% 0.4%

TCSS Noncompetitive $1,275,985 3 0.0% 0.0%

Noncompetitive Total $1,393,073,999 2,094 23.7% 16.2%

Grand Total $5,867,052,128 12,901

Table 2: Aggregated Competition Classifications


IV. CA Reviews of Noncompetitive Purchase Requests of $1M or

Greater

CA Role and Reviews

The CA must complete an independent review of all NPRs valued at $1M or greater and provide feedback and comments to responsible COs. The COs must consider comments and concerns raised by the CA in their evaluation and recommendation concerning the NPR and the proposed supplier. The NPRs are submitted to the COs by the requiring organizations once the purchase/SCM team makes a preliminary purchase method recommendation to proceed noncompetitively.

In FY16, the CA reviewed and commented on 82 NPR’s with a total estimated contract value of $3.2B over a period of five years. The requests ranged from short-term contract modifications of a few months to long-term extensions over multiple years. The requested value included in the NPR is based on the estimated future spend by the requiring organization. The CO may execute each request via a single contract action or via multiple actions within the value defined in the NPR.

The value of the NPR is estimated for the base contract and option periods, as applicable. The actual value of the contract may differ depending on the results of contract negotiations, number of options exercised or if the request is cancelled. Table 3 outlines the total estimated value of NPRs reviewed by the CA by fiscal year.

Each NPR must be based on one of the four following business scenarios:

a. Sole Source.

b. Industry Structure or Practice.

c. Compelling Business Interests.

d. Superior Performance.

Fiscal Year NPR Requested Value

FY2016 512,960,048$

FY2017 1,208,754,969$

FY2018 751,071,739$

FY2019+ 738,714,786$

Total 3,211,501,542$

Table 3. NPR Value by FY


Table 4 provides the details related to each business scenario justification.

Table 5 provides details related to the value and total requests by the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) member organization. Please refer to Appendix G for a list of ELT members.

Overview of High-Value Noncompetitive Contract Actions

In FY16, the CA reviewed 15 NPRs with estimated commitment value of greater than $50M, totaling $2.7B or 82.6% of the total commitment value of NPRs submitted. The majority of these large NPR’s were issued for contracts that were initially awarded competitively and have been extended to ensure continuity of services for large well established programs or for required services. Information about these large NPR’s issued in FY2016 is noted below.

Large Utility Contracts:

An NPR was issued to exercise options to extend four contracts for aggregated electricity services to 3,302 accounts in four (4) deregulated states. The initial contracts were competitively awarded. These contract extensions were needed to ensure continuity of electricity services. By extending the contracts the Postal Service locked in fixed prices and avoided risk associated with market volatility. Additionally, the market pricing offered by the supplier presented a significant savings compared to industry pricing. The estimated contract commitment value of the four contracts was $58.6M.

Biohazard Detection System:

Two NPRs were issued to sole source suppliers related to the Biohazard Detection System (BDS). The first supplier is the only proven and licensed manufacturer of BDS cartridges used in the equipment. The other supplier developed the BDS solution and is currently the only supplier qualified to maintain and make changes to the system. By issuing the contracts, the Postal Service ensured superior performance in keeping employees and the public safe from threats, such as Anthrax. By locking in the costs of the cartridges, the Postal Service would realize a savings of approximately $13M over the duration of one of the contracts. The estimated contract commitment value of both of these contracts combined was $468M.

Business Justification Count Requested Value Percent of Requests Percent of Value

Compelling Business Interests 49 2,195,401,542$ 68.4% 59.8%

Industry Structure or Practice 2 24,400,000$ 0.8% 2.4%

Sole Source 21 587,350,000$ 18.3% 25.6%

Superior Performance 10 404,350,000$ 12.6% 12.2%

Grand Total 82 3,211,501,542$ 100% 100%

Table 4. Business Justification

ELT Count NPR Estimated $ Value Percentage of Request Percentage of Value

CFO 6 188,000,000$ 5.9% 7.3%

CHRO 1 2,300,000$ 0.1% 1.2%

CIO 48 2,024,186,040$ 63.0% 58.5%

CMSO 2 23,000,000$ 0.7% 2.4%

COO 20 485,700,000$ 15.1% 24.4%

CPI 4 158,315,502$ 4.9% 4.9%

DPG 1 330,000,000$ 10.3% 1.2%

Grand Total 82 3,211,501,542$ 100.0% 100.0%

Table 5 NPR's by Executive Leadership Organization


IT Contractor Services:

Four NPRs were issued to extend contracts to provide Information Technology Contractor Services under the Enterprise Technology Services (ETS) program. These contracts were initially awarded competitively with unpriced options and were extended for an additional option period to allow the team time to develop requirements to re-compete the contracts. The Postal Service relies on the superior performance and expertise provided by these suppliers to provide efficient, seamless and uninterrupted system support nationwide. The estimated contract commitment value of these four contract extensions is $782M.

IT Infrastructure:

Two NPRs were issued to exercise options and increase funding to cover IT and network storage requirements. The initial contracts were competitively awarded, but the option period was unpriced initially. The contract modifications were required to meet an increase in data storage needs. By extending the existing contracts with our current suppliers, the Postal Service avoided the risks and costs associated with the conversion of existing data and hardware systems with another supplier. The estimated contract commitment value of the two contracts was $434M.

Consolidation Deconsolidation Facilities:

An NPR was issued to extend the contract for multiple surface transportation suppliers to allow adequate time to complete network optimization and feasibility study to support Article 32 requirements and develop a competitive sourcing strategy. The contracts cover services for Surface Transfer Center (STC), Consolidation Deconsolidation Facility (CDF) and CDF-Preferential (CDF-Pref.) contracts. The estimated contract commitment value of this contract is $207M, for a period of two years.

Delivery Operations:

A non-competitive contract was awarded to a supplier who has provided postal unique equipment and supplies for Delivery Operations for the past 25 years. The supplier is currently the only supplier that offers the manufacturing, equipment, tooling, design, distribution and support services needed to meet the Postal Services requirements. The supplier has made a significant investment in equipment and other resources over the years to support the USPS requirements and offers best values pricing. The estimated value of the contract is $171M over a seven year term.


V. Supply Management Strategies, Tools, and Programs Used to

Promote Competition in FY2016

The value of competition is communicated throughout the Postal Service and embedded into our purchasing practices. The Postal Service promotes competition to obtain best value in the contracting process by executing the following strategies, tools, and programs:

CA Internal Webpage

The CA webpage helps to educate employees on the benefits of competition. The

webpage includes guidance and information about the competitive process, training

materials, and forms.

CA Report of Significant Expiring Contracts

The CA issues tri-annual reports of expiring contracts to all USPS executive vice

presidents. The report identifies all significant contracting actions that will be expiring in

the next nine months. The report was developed to increase the visibility of the

noncompetitive actions among the Postal Service executives, improve the purchase

planning process, and reduce the number of noncompetitive contracts that were issued

due to lack of planning. The report facilitates a process whereby the COs collaborate

with their internal business partners and document planned contracting actions for each

of the expiring contract actions listed on the report.

Simplified Purchasing

The simplified purchasing process is a streamlined competitive purchasing process used to purchase commercially available goods and services valued from $10K to $250K. Simplified purchasing helps promote competition for small buys and can reduce administrative costs, promote efficiency and economy in contracting, and lessen unnecessary burdens on both the Postal Service and its suppliers.

Supplier Communications and Supplier Webpage

SM communicated with its suppliers through multiple channels including: Supplier webpage on usps.com®, Re: Supply newsletter, supplier email list, supplier conferences, and supplier outreach programs. SM developed a robust supplier webpage that provides suppliers with information on “How to Do Business with USPS” and register to become a new supplier. These communication vehicles help promote a clearer understanding within the supplier community of the needs of the Postal Service and promote competition and supplier diversity by identifying the process for suppliers to register to become a new supplier via USPS eSourcing supplier registration tool.

CA Communications

The CA promoted competition through various communications:

Requested COs and postal executives to review report of expiring contracts to help improve purchase planning and identify opportunities for competition.

Delivered briefings and training material to SM employees to help promote competition.

Reviewed NPRs and made recommendations such as issuing issue short-term extensions for contracts when lack of planning or emergency buys were indicated as justification in the NPR. Made recommendations to identify future purchases and develop plans to compete opportunities.


Conducted one-on-one communications with managers during monthly meetings to help develop competitive sourcing strategies.

Conducted meetings with requiring organizations and newly appointed or acting vice presidents to discuss the role of the CA, to promote early involvement of the SM organization in sourcing decisions, and to incorporate competition as a sourcing strategy when appropriate.

Conducted meetings with suppliers to discuss the role of the CA and to encourage them to register their interest in doing business with the Postal Service via eSourcing.

Supplier Outreach As an essential part of the procurement strategy, Supplier Diversity has continued to strengthen the Postal Services competitiveness in the marketplace. By embedding Supplier Diversity into the routine principles and practices that govern the procurement process, the Postal Service focuses on ensuring that all types of suppliers have access to provide value-added products and services it needs to maintain and increase customer satisfaction and decrease overall costs. These efforts resulted in contract commitments that exceeded $2.9 billion with small businesses, $379 million with minority businesses and $651 million with women-owned businesses. During FY2016, Supplier Diversity reached over 25,000 potential suppliers by participating in Congressional, Federal and industry events and conferences focused on supplier diversity and development across the nation.

The Postal Service maintains memberships with premier multicultural business and trade associations, such as; the National Minority Supplier Development Council, Women’s Business Enterprise National Council, U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, U.S. Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce and the National Congress of American Indians with a combined total of over 40,000 members. It has also been a supporter of the National Veterans Small Business Engagement activities and the Small Business Administration and is a member of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization. Recently, our work has been recognized by leading publications and organizations including the FederalNewsRadio.com, DiversityPlus magazine, and DiversityBusiness.com which named the Postal Service the country’s top government agency for multicultural business opportunities. In addition, the Postal Service’s Supplier Diversity Program has been recognized by The Presidents’ Roundtable and the PRT Reach Foundation and by the US Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for its significant contributions to supplier diversity and as a supporter of the Hispanic community.

eSourcing The Postal Service uses a tool to simplify complex sourcing decisions and events for better strategic sourcing. eSourcing is an electronic sourcing solution to optimize value, as well as price, from its supply base by factoring cost, risk and performance into


competitive sourcing decisions. It automates various sourcing events from reverse auctions to complex multi-stage optimizations and negotiations and provides both broad and granular visibility into corporate sourcing data. eSourcing supports the Postal Service’s efforts to improve supplier collaboration and innovation, reduce supply base risk and lower costs. Key Components of the eSourcing tool:

Identify sustainable savings across various, complex spend categories.

Mitigate risks and improve compliance through greater visibility and transparency throughout the sourcing process.

Improve productivity through shorter cycle times and improved spending controls.

In conjunction with strategic sourcing, the Postal Service uses eSourcing as a Supplier Registration Tool. As of FY2016, there are approximately 19,000 suppliers registered for eSourcing; granting eligibility for invitations to bid on competitive solicitations. Suppliers were encouraged to register through the Re: Supply Newsletter, CO Communications, FedBizOps, and Supplier Outreach Events.

Market Research and Supply Management Resources

Supply Management employees have access to robust market research that is used to identify best in class products and services and new suppliers in the marketplace. The research is also used to develop cost and price analysis to support contract negotiations. Each year we evaluate and refresh our list of market resources. Some examples of resources available include; Gartner Research, Corporate Executive Board (CEB), IBIS World, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies (CAPS), Equifax Financial Reporting and the Institute of Supply Management (ISM). These resources provide detailed commodity specific industry reports, benchmarks, supplier financial data, risk assessment and market analyst support.

Category Sourcing Strategy Plans (CSSP) & Market Research

SM Portfolio teams developed CSSPs for commodities that represent 80% of total spend under contract. The CSSP process is used to identify market trends, analyze category spend, determine the extent of competition and supplier diversity within the supply base, supplier risk management strategies and assess future business needs. This results in the development of best-value sourcing strategies. CSSPs are updated each year, shared with internal business partners, and reviewed by SM managers to help promote competition, improve project planning, and optimize the supplier base.

Electronic Catalogs and National Contracts

The Postal Service uses national contracts to streamline repetitive buys for products that are used across the organization. Products offered on national contracts are made available to employees as catalogs using the eBuy2 system. Over 97 electronic


catalogs are available via the eBuy2 system to streamline the sourcing process. The eBuy2 system processes over 1.5 million requisitions annually. Contracts may be issued to one or more suppliers. In those circumstances where more than one supplier is on catalog, competition occurs not only at the initial contract award but through ongoing competition throughout the contract lifecycle. The eBuy2 system allows purchasers to compare similar items from different suppliers to make the best-value decision. Catalog suppliers are permitted to reduce their prices throughout the contract term. This produces ongoing competition amongst the suppliers beyond the initial contract award.

SM/CFO Monthly Reports

SM has developed a set of centralized and standardized dashboard reports. The dashboard reports are updated weekly and report contracting performance and metrics against SM goals. Monthly SM/CFO contract and spend reports are produced that provide management visibility to the past and future sourcing actions underway within the organization. The report contains multiple sub-reports related to spending trends: spend with top suppliers; contracting actions for the month; significant long-term contracts; and future sourcing actions in the pipeline with preliminary sourcing plans. These reports help raise the visibility of current and future sourcing actions and initiate earlier dialog on how to improve competition and achieve best value.


VI. Barriers to Competition in FY2016

The levels of competition achieved will vary each year depending on the types of products or services required, the availability of suppliers in the marketplace, supplier capabilities, and other factors including when contracts are expiring. In FY2016, the dollar value of competitive contracts decreased by $3.5B compared to FY15, and the percentage of total competitive contracts decreased by 4% compared to FY15 results.

Table 6. Historical Results

USPS FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Competitive Dollars $1.2B $3.9B $4.9B $5.6B $8.0B $4.5B

% Competitive Contract Dollars 78.8% 78.9% 84.2% 81.9% 80.3% 76.3%

Note: FY11 only represents a half year of data.

Some examples of barriers to competition during FY2016 within the Postal Service were the following:

a. Size and Scale of Postal Service Infrastructure: Due to the size and scale of the Postal Service’s operations, many of our IT solutions and mail processing equipment needs limit opportunities for competition. USPS achieves efficiencies and reduces performance risk by standardizing on specific equipment sets. Many of the systems are customized and designed specifically to meet our business requirements. Though initial decisions are based on competition, given the complexity to design, deploy, and support these large systems, follow-on actions are usually cost prohibitive and limited to the initial supplier until the system no longer meets the needs of the business.

b. Stopgap Measure: In FY16, 22% of the NPR’s submitted to the CA for review were

issued as a stopgap measure. These cases usually involved extending the existing contract for a short period of time to accommodate a follow-on competition, or only needing the supplier(s) for a short while before changing the scope and direction of the project.

c. Sole Source or Unique Requirements: In FY16, 50% of the NPRs submitted to the

CA for review were issued to sole source suppliers or to suppliers that had unique expertise. Much of our legacy software, equipment, or parts for equipment are only provided by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or sub-contractor who worked on the project during initial implementation. OEM suppliers hold patents, licenses, or proprietary rights that restrict our ability to use other suppliers. Extensive and costly reverse engineering would be required to introduce competition in these instances. Reverse engineering also requires specially trained and skilled engineering and specialized resources to execute efficiently.


VII. Summary

This report outlined the Postal Service’s efforts to continue to drive competition internally through the execution of numerous activities, tools, and reporting. The Postal Service is able to leverage the competitive marketplace externally through the deployment of our extensive market research supplier outreach and diversity program, which is one of the primary resources for increasing the pool of suppliers for the Postal Service. To date, we have contracts with over 20,000 suppliers. The Postal Service communicates the benefits of competition throughout the organization and its processes are well established. The CA issues a report of expiring contracts to improve contract planning and help to reduce the number of non-competitive contracts that the Postal Service issued due to lack of planning. In FY2016, the percentage of competitive contract dollars remained high at 76.3% of total annual contract values, despite decreasing by 4% compared to FY2015 results. The increase in non-competitive contract dollars was due to the timing of numerous large dollar contracts that were expiring during the period and required the Postal Service to extend them non-competitively to provide continued support for large infrastructure programs. The Postal Service is committed to promoting competition and achieving best value solutions.

Donna L. Schoenbeck, Competition Advocate, prepared the United States Postal Service’s FY2016 Competition Report.


APPENDIX A

Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications for CAMS – 80

Percent of Total Commitment Dollars

From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 7,274 contract actions executed equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) with commitments totaling $4.5B in CAMS. The actions included commitments and de-commitments. The following table highlights the top 80 percent of supplier commitments based on commitment totals and includes the competitive classification breakdown by supplier.


CAMS

Row Labels Count of Competitive Classification Sum of Committed Amt Sum of % Total Cumulative %

VICTORY PACKAGING 12 215,000,000.00$ 4.80% 4.80%

Competitive 12 215,000,000.00$ 4.80%

ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES 230 179,053,713.86$ 3.99% 8.79%

Competitive 4 3,000,000.00$ 0.07%

Noncompetitive - Compelling Business Interests 14 9,091,722.79$ 0.20%

Noncompetitive - Superior Performance 212 166,961,991.07$ 3.72%

HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES LLC 154 125,316,319.71$ 2.80% 11.59%

Competitive 22 16,248,837.54$ 0.36%



FCA NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS LLC 3 107,419,447.00$ 2.40% 13.98%

Competitive 3 107,419,447.00$ 2.40%

UNIVERSAL MCCANN 3 106,152,750.00$ 2.37% 16.35%

Competitive 3 106,152,750.00$ 2.37%

NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION 130 104,494,367.30$ 2.33% 18.68%

Competitive 29 17,092,952.91$ 0.38%



INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 27 102,084,647.88$ 2.28% 20.96%

Competitive 11 12,193,150.00$ 0.27%


Noncompetitive - Sole Source 11 29,617,128.99$ 0.66%

DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP 144 100,682,681.42$ 2.25% 23.21%

Competitive 144 100,682,681.42$ 2.25%

MATHESON FLIGHT EXTENDERS INC 16 93,694,219.42$ 2.09% 25.30%

Competitive 12 92,354,185.13$ 2.06%


WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY INC 58 92,258,457.30$ 2.06% 27.35%

Competitive 56 91,932,272.17$ 2.05%

Competitive - Simplified Purchasing 1 15,459.96$ 0.00%

Noncompetitive - Superior Performance 1 310,725.17$ 0.01%

XO HOLDINGS 45 88,292,997.08$ 1.97% 29.32%

Competitive 45 88,292,997.08$ 1.97%

KALITTA AIR, LLC 12 81,874,130.37$ 1.83% 31.15%

Competitive 6 69,708,968.92$ 1.56%


HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 77 81,091,513.09$ 1.81% 32.96%

Competitive 19 11,648,822.16$ 0.26%


Noncompetitive - Industry Structure or Practice 2 340,654.59$ 0.01%


Noncompetitive - Superior Performance 1 25,763.50$ 0.00%

UNITED AIRLINES INC 5 80,525,451.24$ 1.80% 34.76%

Competitive 5 80,525,451.24$ 1.80%

EMC CORPORATION 41 75,839,888.04$ 1.69% 1.69%

Competitive 2 992,300.40$ 0.02%


Noncompetitive - Industry Structure or Practice 3 2,329,998.27$ 0.05%

METRO AIR SERVICE INC 20 72,915,253.82$ 1.63% 36.38%

Competitive 8 60,588,519.06$ 1.35%


PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC 20 68,399,828.64$ 1.53% 37.91%

Competitive 18 68,002,710.64$ 1.52%

Noncompetitive - Compelling Business Interests 2 397,118.00$ 0.01%

ALPINE AVIATION, INC. 1 68,000,000.00$ 1.52% 39.42%

Competitive 1 68,000,000.00$ 1.52%

LGSTX Distribution Services, Inc 7 59,263,987.00$ 1.32% 40.75%

Competitive 5 26,339,110.96$ 0.59%


AT & T CORPORATION 13 57,268,768.24$ 1.28% 42.02%

Competitive 12 56,521,518.24$ 1.26%


MCCANN- ERICKSON USA INC 22 54,413,621.88$ 1.21% 43.24%

Competitive 22 54,413,621.88$ 1.21%

NCR CORP 30 51,276,952.89$ 1.14% 44.38%

Competitive 22 39,414,702.07$ 0.88%



Noncompetitive - Industry Structure or Practice 1 63,701.62$ 0.00%

ECS FEDERAL INC 29 49,940,780.25$ 1.11% 45.50%

Competitive 29 49,940,780.25$ 1.11%

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 19 49,898,326.00$ 1.11% 46.61%

Competitive 19 49,898,326.00$ 1.11%

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 30 49,162,569.20$ 1.10% 47.71%

Competitive 1 200,000.00$ 0.00%




INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 100 48,315,216.83$ 1.08% 48.78%

Competitive 88 45,647,094.39$ 1.02%




CARGO FORCE INC 12 46,422,891.88$ 1.04% 49.82%

Competitive 8 27,841,846.12$ 0.62%


MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC 11 41,908,634.50$ 0.93% 50.75%

Competitive 10 40,608,634.50$ 0.91%


BANK OF AMERICA 1 36,000,000.00$ 0.80% 51.56%

Competitive 1 36,000,000.00$ 0.80%

HAND HELD PRODUCTS INC 25 34,064,558.79$ 0.76% 52.32%

Competitive 23 33,901,055.51$ 0.76%


GENERAL INFORMATION SERVICES INC 25 32,660,092.89$ 0.73% 53.05%

Competitive 25 32,660,092.89$ 0.73%

NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 10 32,005,234.99$ 0.71% 53.76%

Competitive 10 32,005,234.99$ 0.71%

HP INC 30 31,695,507.14$ 0.71% 54.47%

Competitive 28 31,606,561.94$ 0.71%


MDI 14 31,638,334.63$ 0.71% 55.17%

Competitive 6 2,464,197.06$ 0.05%

Required Source - Policy/Legally Mandated 8 29,174,137.57$ 0.65%

CAMBER CORPORATION 46 30,771,479.44$ 0.69% 55.86%

Competitive 46 30,771,479.44$ 0.69%

PRATT RETAIL SPECIALTIES LLC 8 29,358,885.91$ 0.65% 56.51%

Competitive 8 29,358,885.91$ 0.65%

ASHTON POTTER USA LTD 40 29,244,972.36$ 0.65% 57.17%

Competitive 6 4,866,130.00$ 0.11%

Competitive - Simplified Purchasing 34 24,378,842.36$ 0.54%

FORD MOTOR COMPANY 2 28,965,791.00$ 0.65% 57.81%

Competitive 2 28,965,791.00$ 0.65%

US TRAILER HOLDINGS LLC 2 28,877,011.68$ 0.64% 58.46%


BOYER TRUCKS 1 27,097,886.00$ 0.60% 59.06%

Competitive 1 27,097,886.00$ 0.60%

XPO LOGISTICS SUPPLY CHAIN OF NJ INC 6 26,923,873.14$ 0.60% 59.66%

Competitive 6 26,923,873.14$ 0.60%

OEM SYSTEMS 3 26,321,589.00$ 0.59% 60.25%

Competitive 3 26,321,589.00$ 0.59%

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 5 25,045,108.00$ 0.56% 60.81%

Competitive 5 25,045,108.00$ 0.56%

AMERICAN EXPRESS 1 25,000,000.00$ 0.56% 61.37%


HOLLINGSWORTH LOGISTICS GROUP 10 23,570,751.33$ 0.53% 61.89%

Competitive 10 23,570,751.33$ 0.53%

MATSON NAVIGATION CO 4 23,272,120.00$ 0.52% 62.41%

Competitive 4 23,272,120.00$ 0.52%

UPS WORLDWIDE FORWARDING INC 28 23,102,364.92$ 0.52% 62.93%

Competitive 2 8,362,618.92$ 0.19%


AUTOMATED CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES LLC 32 22,937,730.88$ 0.51% 63.44%

Competitive 16 14,440,501.41$ 0.32%



Noncompetitive - Sole Source 4 374,612.36$ 0.01%

THE WEST RIVER GROUP 5 22,880,000.00$ 0.51% 63.95%

Competitive 5 22,880,000.00$ 0.51%

MBA CONSULTING SERVICES INC 52 22,478,003.90$ 0.50% 64.45%

Competitive 50 22,048,219.90$ 0.49%


TERADATA GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS LLC 20 22,196,023.01$ 0.50% 64.94%

Competitive 2 135,820.00$ 0.00%



FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES INC 2 21,876,183.32$ 0.49% 65.43%


PASHA HAWAII HOLDINGS LLC 2 21,160,000.00$ 0.47% 65.90%

Competitive 2 21,160,000.00$ 0.47%

FLEET VEHICLE SOURCE INC 1 21,066,858.00$ 0.47% 66.37%

Competitive 1 21,066,858.00$ 0.47%

BANKNOTE CORP OF AMERICA INC 39 20,923,189.88$ 0.47% 66.84%

Competitive 5 5,073,457.28$ 0.11%


ORACLE AMERICA INC. 18 20,478,769.62$ 0.46% 67.30%

Competitive 4 1,873,543.34$ 0.04%



SIEMENS POSTAL PARCEL 23 19,318,237.65$ 0.43% 67.73%

Competitive 7 8,263,986.00$ 0.18%




ARAMARK SERVICES INC 3 19,139,000.00$ 0.43% 68.16%

Competitive 3 19,139,000.00$ 0.43%

R R DONNELLEY 24 18,821,926.66$ 0.42% 68.58%

Competitive 18 18,502,988.76$ 0.41%



RAYTHEON BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES INC 4 18,725,701.00$ 0.42% 68.99%


UNITED SORTATION SOLUTIONS 17 15,908,185.40$ 0.35% 69.35%




COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION 15 15,563,779.55$ 0.35% 69.70%

Competitive 15 15,563,779.55$ 0.35%

Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. 1 15,200,000.00$ 0.34% 70.04%


TOTE MARITIME PUERTO RICO LLC 3 15,112,978.00$ 0.34% 70.37%

Competitive 3 15,112,978.00$ 0.34%

IBM CORP 24 14,845,552.07$ 0.33% 70.70%

Competitive 4 1,374,302.62$ 0.03%


Noncompetitive - Industry Structure or Practice 3 5,524,420.55$ 0.12%


SHUERT INDUSTRIES INC 3 14,721,520.50$ 0.33% 71.03%

Competitive 3 14,721,520.50$ 0.33%

COMMERCIAL TRAILER LEASING INC 1 14,431,603.61$ 0.32% 71.35%


GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 48 14,086,642.68$ 0.31% 71.67%

Competitive 6 1,793,811.85$ 0.04%


WESTERN INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS 24 13,870,886.00$ 0.31% 71.98%

Competitive 22 13,198,101.00$ 0.29%


ICF INCORPORATED LLC 8 13,017,915.60$ 0.29% 72.27%

Competitive 8 13,017,915.60$ 0.29%

NOBLIS INC 21 13,001,638.46$ 0.29% 72.56%


INTRALOX LLC 74 12,830,750.58$ 0.29% 72.84%

Competitive 63 10,012,739.13$ 0.22%




TRIENDA HOLDINGS LLC 3 12,585,766.50$ 0.28% 73.12%

Competitive 3 12,585,766.50$ 0.28%

CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 13 11,986,916.44$ 0.27% 73.39%

Competitive 3 490,303.78$ 0.01%



STERIGENICS EAST CORP 1 11,632,512.00$ 0.26% 73.65%


ERNST & YOUNG 1 11,500,000.00$ 0.26% 73.91%


PSI SERVICES LLC 1 11,200,000.00$ 0.25% 74.16%

Competitive 1 11,200,000.00$ 0.25%

MAHINDRA NORTH AMERICAN 1 10,900,000.00$ 0.24% 74.40%

Competitive 1 10,900,000.00$ 0.24%

SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES INC 21 10,787,202.60$ 0.24% 74.64%


AQUILENT INC 47 10,640,653.52$ 0.24% 74.88%

Competitive 47 10,640,653.52$ 0.24%

NORTHERN AIR CARGO 2 10,565,084.26$ 0.24% 75.12%

Competitive 2 10,565,084.26$ 0.24%

JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS INC 18 10,530,235.49$ 0.23% 75.35%

Competitive 18 10,530,235.49$ 0.23%

SMS ASSIST LLC 81 10,449,522.68$ 0.23% 75.58%

Competitive 24 5,196,764.32$ 0.12%


SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 81 10,321,202.69$ 0.23% 75.81%

Competitive 80 10,298,014.69$ 0.23%


CZARNOWSKI DISPLAY SERVICE INC 7 10,312,099.48$ 0.23% 76.04%

Competitive 7 10,312,099.48$ 0.23%


BONEAL INC 84 9,692,175.16$ 0.22% 76.26%

Competitive 8 4,197,518.75$ 0.09%




DTZ INC 24 9,665,030.23$ 0.22% 76.48%

Competitive 21 9,490,488.59$ 0.21%


WORLDGROUP RETAIL 14 9,599,526.34$ 0.21% 76.69%

Competitive 14 9,599,526.34$ 0.21%

NEW DIRECTIONS IN SALES 172 9,164,980.84$ 0.20% 76.89%

Competitive 3 1,623,550.00$ 0.04%



AT&T MOBILITY NAT'L ACCTS LLC 10 8,985,128.28$ 0.20% 77.09%

Competitive 10 8,985,128.28$ 0.20%

HUB LOGISTICS GROUP 2 8,979,859.00$ 0.20% 77.29%

Competitive 2 8,979,859.00$ 0.20%

AIRCRAFT SERVICE INTERNATIONAL INC 3 8,967,570.54$ 0.20% 77.49%

Competitive 3 8,967,570.54$ 0.20%

AM GENERAL LLC 1 8,753,753.00$ 0.20% 77.69%

Competitive 1 8,753,753.00$ 0.20%

MICROSTRATEGY SERVICES CORPORATION 5 8,290,572.52$ 0.18% 77.87%


SIEMENS POSTAL PARCEL AND AIRPORT LOGISTICS LLC 14 8,281,633.20$ 0.18% 78.06%

Competitive 6 3,848,172.00$ 0.09%




THE SIEBOLD COMPANY INC 17 7,789,259.88$ 0.17% 78.23%

Competitive 4 2,274,170.02$ 0.05%



NATIONAL AIR CARGO GROUP INC 2 7,613,142.16$ 0.17% 78.40%

Competitive 2 7,613,142.16$ 0.17%

JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS 7 7,599,538.20$ 0.17% 78.57%

Competitive 7 7,599,538.20$ 0.17%

ReadyOne Industries 7 7,510,940.40$ 0.17% 78.74%


CEPHEID 1 7,441,920.00$ 0.17% 78.91%


OCS CHECKWEIGHERS INC 2 7,143,218.15$ 0.16% 79.07%

Competitive 2 7,143,218.15$ 0.16%

BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 1 7,118,624.00$ 0.16% 79.22%

Competitive 1 7,118,624.00$ 0.16%

SYMANTEC 10 6,948,981.47$ 0.16% 79.38%

Competitive 1 46,140.00$ 0.00%


BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES INC 8 6,899,875.21$ 0.15% 79.53%


SOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE 9 6,701,715.94$ 0.15% 79.68%



UNITED HEALTHCARE 2 6,576,125.00$ 0.15% 79.83%

Competitive 2 6,576,125.00$ 0.15%

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 6,568,350.00$ 0.15% 79.98%


VT HACKNEY INC 1 6,423,401.20$ 0.14% 80.12%


APPENDIX B

Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications for TCSS – 80


From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 1,072 new contract actions executed equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) with commitments totaling $808.7M. The committed value of the contracts was calculated by multiplying the annual value of the contract by the contract term as TCSS only captures the annual value of the contract. The following table highlights the top 80 percent of supplier commitments based on commitment totals.

Values

SUPPLIER COMPETITIVE_CLASS LIFE COST LIFE COST % Cumulative %

POSTAL FLEET SERVICES INC COMPETITIVE $109,567,898 4.12% 4.12%

NONCOMPETITIVE - COMPELLING BUSINESS INTERESTS $33,237 0.00% 4.12%

EAGLE EXPRESS LINES INC COMPETITIVE $95,718,601 3.60% 7.72%

HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $7,155,716 0.27% 7.99%

BEAM BROS TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $99,707,161 3.75% 11.74%

MIDWEST TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $69,119,369 2.60% 14.34%


PEAK SEASON(COMPETITIVE CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $11,606 0.00% 14.68%

FLS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (USA) INCCOMPETITIVE $70,518,215 2.65% 17.33%

BANCROFT & SONS TRANSPORTATION LLCCOMPETITIVE $67,146,933 2.53% 19.85%

SODREL TRUCK LINES INC COMPETITIVE $59,310,156 2.23% 22.08%


B & B TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $54,408,318 2.05% 24.27%


TRACIE MCCORMICK INC COMPETITIVE $43,001,051 1.62% 26.05%

SOUTHERN MAIL SERV INC COMPETITIVE $39,163,523 1.47% 27.53%

JOHN W RITTER TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $37,485,468 1.41% 28.94%

URSA MAJOR CORPORATION COMPETITIVE $29,611,298 1.11% 30.05%


MAIL CONTRACTORS OF ARKANSAS INC COMPETITIVE $26,055,208 0.98% 31.13%


SHEEHY MAIL CONTRACTORS INC COMPETITIVE $15,327,025 0.58% 31.81%


HOOVESTOL INC COMPETITIVE $24,236,868 0.91% 33.08%

HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $540,156 0.02% 33.10%

DAVENPORT TRANSPORTATION INC COMPETITIVE $24,180,842 0.91% 34.01%

PEAK SEASON(COMPETITIVE CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $482 0.00% 34.01%

BECO INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $21,038,368 0.79% 34.80%

COMPETITIVE $2,312,031 0.09% 34.89%

MIDLAND DELIVERY SERVICE INC COMPETITIVE $22,553,480 0.85% 35.74%

HARTWIG TRANSIT INC COMPETITIVE $18,915,438 0.71% 36.45%


MAPLES TRUCK LINE INC COMPETITIVE $18,216,179 0.69% 37.22%


RED DIAMOND TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $20,208,425 0.76% 38.08%

THUNDER RIDGE TRANS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $11,687,262 0.44% 38.52%

COMPETITIVE $7,479,793 0.28% 38.80%

CAMINANTE TRUCKING COMPETITIVE $14,780,375 0.56% 39.36%


DAVIS MAIL SERVICES INC COMPETITIVE $18,725,743 0.70% 40.21%

KRIS WAY TRUCK LEASING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $13,431,949 0.51% 40.72%

COMPETITIVE $3,860,777 0.15% 40.86%

FLORIDA CARRIERS & BROKER SERVICES INC $15,810,640 0.59% 41.46%

VELTRI INC COMPETITIVE $12,277,438 0.46% 41.92%


EF THOMPSON INC COMPETITIVE $15,356,612 0.58% 42.62%

TCSS


ROBERT M NEFF INC COMPETITIVE $14,878,015 0.56% 43.18%

FAMES TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $8,253,804 0.31% 43.49%


US PARATRANSIT CORP COMPETITIVE $13,974,755 0.53% 44.24%

ROOD TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $13,948,771 0.52% 44.76%

AJR TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $13,128,358 0.49% 45.26%

FOUNDATION XPRESS LLC COMPETITIVE $12,045,559 0.45% 45.71%

K & K TRUCKING OF ROCKWELL, LLC COMPETITIVE $11,799,139 0.44% 46.15%

JOHN R MOTT INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $11,682,500 0.44% 46.59%

E C STANTON INC COMPETITIVE $11,560,514 0.43% 47.03%

PAT SALMON & SONS INC COMPETITIVE $11,286,816 0.42% 47.45%

LANGE TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $10,920,234 0.41% 47.86%

WILCOX TRUCK LINE INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $6,421,660 0.24% 48.10%

COMPETITIVE $4,236,358 0.16% 48.26%

PATTERSON GULF INC COMPETITIVE $10,460,849 0.39% 48.66%

R & F TRANSPORTATION CO INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $10,204,106 0.38% 49.04%

LOUIS V LEPAK TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $10,182,579 0.38% 49.42%

FX LOGISTICS LLC COMPETITIVE $10,060,072 0.38% 49.80%


M C EIPPERLE INC COMPETITIVE $9,938,238 0.37% 50.18%

LVL INC COMPETITIVE $9,291,851 0.35% 50.52%

MILLS TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $9,233,024 0.35% 50.87%

DDA TRANSPORT INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $7,691,642 0.29% 51.16%

COMPETITIVE $1,427,239 0.05% 51.21%

DONALD E KRAUS TRUCKING COMPETITIVE $9,111,497 0.34% 51.56%

C BLACKBURN INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $7,680,708 0.29% 51.85%

COMPETITIVE $1,149,865 0.04% 51.89%

KEMNER DELIVERY SERVICE, INC COMPETITIVE $8,813,965 0.33% 52.22%

LYONS EXPRESS LLC COMPETITIVE $8,809,953 0.33% 52.55%

B&B INDUSTRIES INC COMPETITIVE $8,654,848 0.33% 52.88%

RONALD WAYNE POWERS INC COMPETITIVE $8,520,720 0.32% 53.20%

VALLEY EXPRESS INC COMPETITIVE $8,435,209 0.32% 53.52%

MATHESON POSTAL SERVICES INC COMPETITIVE $8,075,114 0.30% 53.82%


STAR ROUTE TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $8,389,067 0.32% 54.15%

SADLER BROS TRUCKING & LEASING CO INCCOMPETITIVE $8,110,388 0.31% 54.45%

R L TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $5,743,088 0.22% 54.67%


MCCORMICKS LLC COMPETITIVE $7,715,002 0.29% 55.04%

AMERITRANS EXPRESS LLC COMPETITIVE $7,637,278 0.29% 55.33%

KITTERMAN & SONS TRUCKING, LLC COMPETITIVE $7,586,300 0.29% 55.62%

J AND K TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $7,455,929 0.28% 55.90%

ENIDAN ENTERPRISES LLC COMPETITIVE $7,452,903 0.28% 56.18%

PEAK SEASON(COMPETITIVE CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $25 0.00% 56.18%

DAVOSA TRANSPORT SERVICE COMPETITIVE $7,413,331 0.28% 56.46%


PACIFIC ALLIANCE TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $7,260,175 0.27% 56.73%

FAGAN TRANSPORTATION & SERVICE INCCOMPETITIVE $7,252,761 0.27% 57.00%

HB PHILLIPS INC COMPETITIVE $7,214,231 0.27% 57.27%

KANSOTA TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $5,211,682 0.20% 57.47%


LUCAS TRUCKING CORP COMPETITIVE $7,158,396 0.27% 57.81%


PONY EXPRESS DELIVERY INC COMPETITIVE $6,501,966 0.24% 58.06%


FALLEN TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $6,573,786 0.25% 58.31%

WILLIAM C WERNICKI TRUCKING COMPANYHWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $5,940,851 0.22% 58.53%

COMPETITIVE $468,856 0.02% 58.55%

HACKENBERG BROS INC COMPETITIVE $6,401,438 0.24% 58.79%

MARK W CLEMONS HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $5,679,823 0.21% 59.00%

COMPETITIVE $672,861 0.03% 59.03%

MASSMAN TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $6,289,162 0.24% 59.27%

MBM TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $6,174,073 0.23% 59.50%

T & T ENTERPRISES OF OHIO INC COMPETITIVE $6,047,590 0.23% 59.73%

JAMES O BRADY INC COMPETITIVE $5,998,892 0.23% 59.95%

SOUTH WIND TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $5,925,509 0.22% 60.17%

POSTAL TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $5,905,343 0.22% 60.40%

RAHEEM TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $5,840,766 0.22% 60.62%

ALAN RITCHEY INC COMPETITIVE $5,811,264 0.22% 60.84%

ZETRICK LLC COMPETITIVE $5,641,858 0.21% 61.05%

CRITES TRANSFER INC COMPETITIVE $5,521,865 0.21% 61.25%

ROONEY TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $4,417,486 0.17% 61.42%


B & F TRANSPORTATION INC COMPETITIVE $5,362,688 0.20% 61.66%

NORMBELLE TRANSPORT LTD COMPETITIVE $5,227,080 0.20% 61.86%

W B ADAMS TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $5,206,151 0.20% 62.05%

ROYALTY TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,893,902 0.11% 62.16%

COMPETITIVE $2,282,162 0.09% 62.25%

P&R TRAILER REPAIR INC COMPETITIVE $5,154,108 0.19% 62.44%

AREA STORAGE & TRANSFER INC COMPETITIVE $5,099,205 0.19% 62.63%

MICHALETZ TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $5,089,921 0.19% 62.82%

TODD A RUCK INC COMPETITIVE $4,957,381 0.19% 63.01%

CLIFFORD BLACKBURN HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $4,867,194 0.18% 63.19%

SC&G TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $4,855,881 0.18% 63.38%

KALLMEYER BROS ENTERPRISES INC COMPETITIVE $3,301,240 0.12% 63.50%


JOSEPH M MACK HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $4,657,528 0.18% 63.73%

NORBAR INC COMPETITIVE $4,488,245 0.17% 63.89%

WESTWOOD CARTAGE INC $4,345,997 0.16% 64.06%

K. M. NIELSEN TRUCKING LP COMPETITIVE $4,343,731 0.16% 64.22%

MCCANN DELIVERY SERVICE INC. COMPETITIVE $4,343,407 0.16% 64.39%

PAK-AM TRANSIT COMPETITIVE $4,308,654 0.16% 64.55%

ACTION MOVING & STORAGE INC COMPETITIVE $4,267,284 0.16% 64.71%

PORTER USPS CONTRACTING LLC COMPETITIVE $4,236,795 0.16% 64.87%

MISTI'S TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $3,943,085 0.15% 65.02%


WESBECK TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $4,219,491 0.16% 65.18%

MCCORMICK TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $4,197,126 0.16% 65.34%

EDWARD J LOCKERBY COMPETITIVE $2,285,885 0.09% 65.43%

COMPETITIVE - SIMPLIFIED PURCHASE $1,061,543 0.04% 65.47%


W W MAILS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $4,172,495 0.16% 65.66%

JEB TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $4,168,035 0.16% 65.81%

MARROQUIN EXPRESS INC COMPETITIVE $4,095,139 0.15% 65.97%

LENELL CHEATHAM COMPETITIVE $4,090,018 0.15% 66.12%

LE-MAR HOLDINGS INC COMPETITIVE $4,024,584 0.15% 66.27%


TJJ TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $4,005,340 0.15% 66.42%

MCRAES US MAIL SERVICE INC COMPETITIVE $3,973,196 0.15% 66.57%

LAPO INC COMPETITIVE $3,968,621 0.15% 66.72%

KGS INC COMPETITIVE $3,965,818 0.15% 66.87%

EDWARD ZENGEL & SON EXPRESS INC COMPETITIVE $3,959,064 0.15% 67.02%

LUIS SAMBUCETTI & COMPETITIVE $3,741,998 0.14% 67.16%

TED RUCK COMPANY COMPETITIVE $3,741,329 0.14% 67.30%

TRIPLE R AND SONS LLC, INC COMPETITIVE $3,687,008 0.14% 67.44%

BLACK & WINSOR HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $3,683,368 0.14% 67.58%

SAMUEL D CARBO JR COMPETITIVE $3,665,844 0.14% 67.72%

GOLD LEAF CARRIERS LLC COMPETITIVE $3,663,286 0.14% 67.85%

KASBAR INC COMPETITIVE $3,610,520 0.14% 67.99%

HIS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $3,603,434 0.14% 68.13%

POWELL TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $3,584,113 0.13% 68.26%

KATLYN INC COMPETITIVE $3,583,665 0.13% 68.40%

LUIS H SAMBUCETTI COMPETITIVE $3,539,409 0.13% 68.53%

JUSTMAN FREIGHT LINES INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $3,538,227 0.13% 68.66%

DONALD C STAHLER SR INC COMPETITIVE $3,509,271 0.13% 68.79%

D & S DISTRIBUTION SERVICES INC COMPETITIVE $3,505,139 0.13% 68.93%

GOWEN MOTOR SERVICE INC COMPETITIVE $3,379,053 0.13% 69.05%

DOUGLAS M FECK COMPETITIVE $3,375,534 0.13% 69.18%

SALANGER TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $2,253,166 0.08% 69.26%


COMPETITIVE - SIMPLIFIED PURCHASE $256,720 0.01% 69.31%

HORWATH TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $3,326,996 0.13% 69.43%

KLIZOTTE CONTRACTORS COMPETITIVE $3,294,511 0.12% 69.55%

D-B CARTAGE INC COMPETITIVE $3,265,400 0.12% 69.68%

CLAYTON R RANDOLPH JR COMPETITIVE $3,258,514 0.12% 69.80%

OSMO ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVE $3,169,394 0.12% 69.92%

JERRY L WEBB COMPETITIVE $3,034,213 0.11% 70.03%

THUMAN TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $2,966,938 0.11% 70.14%

W & L MAIL SERVICE INC COMPETITIVE $2,940,085 0.11% 70.26%

OWEN ENTERPRISES INC COMPETITIVE $2,902,281 0.11% 70.36%

SAMUEL CARBO JR COMPETITIVE $2,894,562 0.11% 70.47%

BETTENCOURT TRANSPORT COMPETITIVE $2,892,371 0.11% 70.58%

ERIC OLIVER TRAUTMAN HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,890,934 0.11% 70.69%

BLUE TICK INCORPORATED COMPETITIVE $2,887,078 0.11% 70.80%

EXPERIENCED MAIL TRANSPORT INC COMPETITIVE $2,884,052 0.11% 70.91%

R TUMBLEWEED TRANSPORTATION LLC COMPETITIVE $2,867,927 0.11% 71.02%

QUALITY ONE TRANSPORT LLC COMPETITIVE $2,841,613 0.11% 71.12%

UNITED TRANSPORTATION SVCS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,824,523 0.11% 71.23%

LEABS TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $2,823,925 0.11% 71.34%

PAULA L HAKALA HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,524,408 0.09% 71.43%

COMPETITIVE $281,036 0.01% 71.44%

MARK STEVEN BALL COMPETITIVE $2,797,382 0.11% 71.55%

STINGRAY DISTRIBUTING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,796,685 0.11% 71.65%

MARTIN CARMICHAEL HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,786,152 0.10% 71.76%

HIGHWAY MAIL COMPANY COMPETITIVE $2,740,347 0.10% 71.86%

THOMAS LEE DELK COMPETITIVE $2,731,256 0.10% 71.96%

ROBERT RAYMOND WERNICKI HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,724,100 0.10% 72.06%

RAUL ESCOBALES HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,711,910 0.10% 72.17%

DAVID H LITTLEFIELD HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,640,620 0.10% 72.27%

CHANELLE & BRANDOS TRANSPORT, LLC $2,637,916 0.10% 72.36%

DAVID K PRILLAMAN COMPETITIVE $2,622,664 0.10% 72.46%


LAKES LOGISTICS COMPETITIVE $2,581,778 0.10% 72.56%

O & M TRUCKING CO LLC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,578,460 0.10% 72.66%

SMITH-CARGO TRANSPORTATION LLC COMPETITIVE $2,560,737 0.10% 72.75%

ODLAND TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $2,519,583 0.09% 72.85%

HENRY A CRUZ BRIOSO COMPETITIVE $2,484,253 0.09% 72.94%

LINDA S COX COMPETITIVE $2,480,902 0.09% 73.04%

DODD UNLIMITED INC COMPETITIVE $2,444,493 0.09% 73.13%

LARRY HARTMAN COMPETITIVE $2,444,472 0.09% 73.22%

JENBAR TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $2,437,641 0.09% 73.31%

VIP COURIER EXPRESS LLC COMPETITIVE $2,429,990 0.09% 73.40%

ALBERT MARTELL COMPETITIVE $2,286,915 0.09% 73.49%


JESUS ANTONIO MENDEZ COMPETITIVE $2,422,750 0.09% 73.58%

CHARLES ALBERT RICHARDSON COMPETITIVE $2,410,329 0.09% 73.67%

COP TRANSPORTATION LLC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,653,813 0.06% 73.74%

COMPETITIVE $738,271 0.03% 73.76%

JAX LOGISTICS DEDICATED SERVICES COMPETITIVE $2,322,737 0.09% 73.85%

RM TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $2,290,052 0.09% 73.94%

WEBER TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $1,548,083 0.06% 74.00%

COMPETITIVE - SIMPLIFIED PURCHASE $739,582 0.03% 74.02%

J D JOHNSON COMPETITIVE $2,281,245 0.09% 74.11%

FRANCIS R MESSNER JR COMPETITIVE $2,278,771 0.09% 74.20%

WYLIE LIVINGSTON TAYLOR COMPETITIVE $2,277,287 0.09% 74.28%

LOCKES MAIL SVC INC COMPETITIVE $2,274,188 0.09% 74.37%

J WAYNE INC COMPETITIVE $2,261,941 0.09% 74.45%

DAN R LIBBERT COMPETITIVE $2,200,269 0.08% 74.53%

C & B TRUCKING COMPANY COMPETITIVE $2,131,025 0.08% 74.62%

RICHARD ALOISIO TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $2,098,403 0.08% 74.69%

JONATHAN S GEORGE COMPETITIVE $2,018,657 0.08% 74.77%

HERBYS TRANSFER COMPETITIVE $2,015,732 0.08% 74.85%

EDWARD R FIKE COMPETITIVE $2,008,667 0.08% 74.92%

JONATHAN GEORGE EXPEDITING LLC COMPETITIVE $1,997,595 0.08% 75.00%

JUDITH EASON PATE HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,987,818 0.07% 75.07%

PEPPER MAIL SERVICE INC COMPETITIVE $1,984,640 0.07% 75.15%

CHRISTIAN D GOHN COMPETITIVE $1,982,484 0.07% 75.22%

HEGINS VALLEY LINES INC COMPETITIVE $1,953,776 0.07% 75.29%

MOHAMED I KAMEL HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,635,748 0.06% 75.36%

COMPETITIVE $314,486 0.01% 75.37%

LEROY H BELLAIR COMPETITIVE $1,608,169 0.06% 75.43%


TIBBS CONTRACT MAIL COMPETITIVE $1,942,163 0.07% 75.51%

D P MILLER TRUCKING CO INC COMPETITIVE $1,929,127 0.07% 75.59%

J & W ENTERPRISES OF GREEN BAY INC COMPETITIVE $1,508,188 0.06% 75.64%


RONALD A KIMBERLY COMPETITIVE $1,912,703 0.07% 75.73%

GARY LEE HENDRIEX COMPETITIVE $1,910,856 0.07% 75.80%

REMY MALIWANAG RODRIGUEZ COMPETITIVE $1,909,368 0.07% 75.87%

Y & B TRUCKING HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,906,700 0.07% 75.95%

WALKER TRUCKING COMPETITIVE $1,906,263 0.07% 76.02%

FRM MAIL CONTRACTING INC COMPETITIVE $1,889,107 0.07% 76.09%

TRIPLE L INC COMPETITIVE $1,878,563 0.07% 76.16%

DANIEL DAVID RIHNER COMPETITIVE $1,009,301 0.04% 76.20%


D. R. HARGROVE TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $1,868,581 0.07% 76.30%

CRIDER TRUCK LEASING COMPETITIVE $1,858,728 0.07% 76.37%

MCCLELLAN TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $1,843,106 0.07% 76.44%

LYON TRANSPORT, LLC COMPETITIVE $1,817,557 0.07% 76.51%

IMMESBERGER TRANSPT INC COMPETITIVE $1,800,987 0.07% 76.57%

T&T ENTERPRISES OF OHIO INC COMPETITIVE $1,784,488 0.07% 76.64%

CBF TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $1,782,319 0.07% 76.71%

JONES EXPRESS CO INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,766,792 0.07% 76.78%

PACIFIC EXPRESS INC COMPETITIVE $1,764,323 0.07% 76.84%

RAYMOND G RICHARDSON JR INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,745,137 0.07% 76.91%

DANIELS TRANSPORTATION CO INC COMPETITIVE $1,720,467 0.06% 76.97%

FRANCIS R MESSNER COMPETITIVE $1,691,542 0.06% 77.04%

D & J MAIL SERVICE HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,684,971 0.06% 77.10%

CHARLES LEE COMPETITIVE $1,674,932 0.06% 77.16%

SJM UNLIMITED INC COMPETITIVE $1,647,117 0.06% 77.22%

DKA TRANSPORTATION INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,626,887 0.06% 77.29%

GOT MAIL LLC COMPETITIVE $1,608,572 0.06% 77.35%

DALLAS E ELLIOTT COMPETITIVE $1,600,431 0.06% 77.41%

LAWRENCE W HENSINGER COMPETITIVE $1,563,367 0.06% 77.46%

C4 LIVESTOCK AND PRODUCTS, LLC COMPETITIVE $1,558,933 0.06% 77.52%


PEGGY STAFFORD COMPETITIVE $1,555,745 0.06% 77.58%

DAN PALYS TRANSPORTATION LLC COMPETITIVE $1,543,981 0.06% 77.64%

CHARLES D RINALDI INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,542,946 0.06% 77.70%

GLOVERS SOLUTIONS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,536,066 0.06% 77.76%

JK HANDYMAN SERVICES LLC COMPETITIVE $1,193,122 0.04% 77.80%


DUANE L STOREY HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,444,172 0.05% 77.87%

COMPETITIVE $51,652 0.00% 77.87%

DENNIS DONOHUE MAIL SERVICE LLC COMPETITIVE $1,482,506 0.06% 77.93%

CARROLL FULMER LOGISTIC COMPETITIVE $1,482,414 0.06% 77.98%

WHITE MOUNTAIN PASSENGER LINES INCHWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,475,663 0.06% 78.04%

B H WELLINGTON INC COMPETITIVE $1,473,566 0.06% 78.09%

DONNY RAY BUCHANAN COMPETITIVE $1,466,662 0.06% 78.15%

GREGORY R RAINEY COMPETITIVE $1,460,745 0.05% 78.20%

DELTRANS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,452,895 0.05% 78.26%

POSTAL CARRIER CORP COMPETITIVE $1,438,464 0.05% 78.31%

PETRILLO TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $1,437,787 0.05% 78.36%

JOHN FRASCONA HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,436,197 0.05% 78.42%

MELBA EXPRESS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,431,926 0.05% 78.47%

AL FORTE INC COMPETITIVE $1,425,128 0.05% 78.53%

TIMOTHY LOREN CUMMINGS COMPETITIVE $1,421,002 0.05% 78.58%

PHILLIP R WETHERHOLT COMPETITIVE $1,401,900 0.05% 78.63%

IMPERIAL TRUCKING LLC COMPETITIVE $1,396,671 0.05% 78.68%

MO-KAN MAIL CONTRACTORS INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,391,493 0.05% 78.74%

DRAKE OF CONKLIN, LLC COMPETITIVE $1,390,981 0.05% 78.79%

TIMOTHY WAYNE BURNS COMPETITIVE $1,371,464 0.05% 78.84%

NATHANIEL TALBOT MORRIS COMPETITIVE $1,370,725 0.05% 78.89%

MOORE U S MAIL CONTRACTOR INC COMPETITIVE $1,369,921 0.05% 78.94%

REYNOLDS TRANSFER COMPETITIVE $790,258 0.03% 78.97%


RENA MARIE CAGE COMPETITIVE $1,349,781 0.05% 79.05%

C & K DELIVERY INC COMPETITIVE $1,338,432 0.05% 79.10%

TOPO TRUCKING ENTERPRISES INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,331,090 0.05% 79.15%

GARY WAYNE NOBLE COMPETITIVE $1,325,668 0.05% 79.20%

MICHAEL EUGENE KAISER HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,311,903 0.05% 79.25%

GLENN MICHAEL BRICK COMPETITIVE $1,308,942 0.05% 79.30%

MAX ARTHUR FRITZ COMPETITIVE $1,287,495 0.05% 79.34%

EZONE EXPRESS INC COMPETITIVE $1,267,749 0.05% 79.39%

HOKULANI KIGYO, LLC COMPETITIVE $1,266,042 0.05% 79.44%

JOHN E DASHER COMPETITIVE $1,253,762 0.05% 79.49%

R & C STAGE LINES INC COMPETITIVE $1,234,387 0.05% 79.53%

JERRY WAGNER HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,233,161 0.05% 79.58%

MAD DASH MONTANA DELIVERY INC COMPETITIVE $631,043 0.02% 79.60%


TRANSPORTE LUGO INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,206,664 0.05% 79.67%

BOBBY W GILLION HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $933,554 0.04% 79.71%

COMPETITIVE $256,573 0.01% 79.72%

SOLUTION TRANSPORT INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $1,179,521 0.04% 79.76%

CAUSLEY TRUCKING INC HWY RENEWAL (COMPETITION CODING NOT APPLICABLE) $926,419 0.03% 79.79%

COMPETITIVE $251,848 0.01% 79.80%

D & N TRUCKING INC COMPETITIVE $1,177,938 0.04% 79.85%

JOSEPH LEE YOUNG COMPETITIVE $1,176,446 0.04% 79.89%

FIRST EXPRESS SERVICES COMPETITIVE $1,175,123 0.04% 79.94%

BURGER-SORENSON COMPETITIVE $1,174,514 0.04% 79.98%

ROBIN R COLLINS COMPETITIVE $1,169,783 0.04% 80.02%


APPENDIX C

Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications for eFMS — 80


From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, there were a total of 4,555 contract actions equal to or above the competitive threshold ($10K) executed in eFMS with commitments totaling $575.7M. The following table highlights the top 80 percent of supplier commitments based on commitment totals.

Vendor Contract Competitive Classification Code Sum of Transaction Amount Sum of % of Total Cumulative %

KORTE CONSTRUCTION CO COMPETITIVE 92,796,525.00$ 16.12%

KORTE CONSTRUCTION CO Total 92,796,525.00$ 16.12% 16.12%

PARSONS CORPORATION COMPETITIVE 24,881,877.10$ 4.32%

PARSONS CORPORATION Total 24,881,877.10$ 4.32% 20.44%

LIGHTON INDUSTRIES INC COMPETITIVE 22,075,182.67$ 3.83%

LIGHTON INDUSTRIES INC Total 22,075,182.67$ 3.83% 24.28%

J J MORLEY ENTERPRISES INC COMPETITIVE 16,011,382.38$ 2.78%

J J MORLEY ENTERPRISES INC Total 16,011,382.38$ 2.78% 27.06%

ROTH BROS INC COMPETITIVE 14,935,866.55$ 2.59%

ROTH BROS INC Total 14,935,866.55$ 2.59% 29.65%

AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT COMPETITIVE 13,344,679.25$ 2.32%

AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT Total 13,344,679.25$ 2.32% 31.97%

SIEDLECKI CONSTRUCTION CO COMPETITIVE 10,375,316.12$ 1.80%

SIEDLECKI CONSTRUCTION CO Total 10,375,316.12$ 1.80% 33.77%

MORCON CONSTRUCTION CO INC. COMPETITIVE 9,556,722.83$ 1.66%

MORCON CONSTRUCTION CO INC. Total 9,556,722.83$ 1.66% 35.43%

URS GROUP COMPETITIVE 8,402,719.23$ 1.46%

URS GROUP Total 8,402,719.23$ 1.46% 36.89%

THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP INC COMPETITIVE 8,038,958.88$ 1.40%

THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP INC Total 8,038,958.88$ 1.40% 38.29%

RENICK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPETITIVE 7,934,000.00$ 1.38%

RENICK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION Total 7,934,000.00$ 1.38% 39.67%

MADISON CONSTR COMPETITIVE 7,887,137.00$ 1.37%

MADISON CONSTR Total 7,887,137.00$ 1.37% 41.04%

HEISEY MECHANICAL LTD COMPETITIVE 6,985,716.77$ 1.21%

HEISEY MECHANICAL LTD Total 6,985,716.77$ 1.21% 42.25%

BISCAYNE CONTRACTORS INC COMPETITIVE 6,736,033.79$ 1.17%

NONCOMPETITIVE - COMPELLING BUSINESS INTERESTS 240,000.00$ 0.04%

BISCAYNE CONTRACTORS INC Total 6,976,033.79$ 1.21% 43.46%

F H PASCHEN SN NIELSEN COMPETITIVE 6,134,394.61$ 1.07%

F H PASCHEN SN NIELSEN Total 6,134,394.61$ 1.07% 44.53%

BASIC IDIQ INC COMPETITIVE 6,117,159.35$ 1.06%

BASIC IDIQ INC Total 6,117,159.35$ 1.06% 45.59%

EPIC CONSTRUCTION COMPETITIVE 5,847,457.72$ 1.02%

EPIC CONSTRUCTION Total 5,847,457.72$ 1.02% 46.61%


THE GORDIAN GROUP INC COMPETITIVE 5,440,001.12$ 0.94%

NONCOMPETITIVE - COMPELLING BUSINESS INTERESTS 245,817.25$ 0.04%

THE GORDIAN GROUP INC Total 5,685,818.37$ 0.99% 47.59%

KEITH KC LEE INC COMPETITIVE 5,545,338.28$ 0.96%

KEITH KC LEE INC Total 5,545,338.28$ 0.96% 48.56%

CENTERRA INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION COMPETITIVE 5,536,781.93$ 0.96%

CENTERRA INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION Total 5,536,781.93$ 0.96% 49.52%

R J CROWLEY INC COMPETITIVE 5,356,371.75$ 0.93%

R J CROWLEY INC Total 5,356,371.75$ 0.93% 50.45%

FONTAINE BROTHERS INC COMPETITIVE 5,273,449.67$ 0.92%

FONTAINE BROTHERS INC Total 5,273,449.67$ 0.92% 51.37%

GRIDPOINT INC COMPETITIVE 5,213,326.05$ 0.91%

GRIDPOINT INC Total 5,213,326.05$ 0.91% 52.27%

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPETITIVE 5,207,435.92$ 0.90%

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION Total 5,207,435.92$ 0.90% 53.18%

AGENCY CONSTRUCTION CORP COMPETITIVE 5,173,718.83$ 0.90%

AGENCY CONSTRUCTION CORP Total 5,173,718.83$ 0.90% 54.07%

J P & C CONSTRUCTION INC COMPETITIVE 5,167,740.99$ 0.90%

J P & C CONSTRUCTION INC Total 5,167,740.99$ 0.90% 54.97%

NORTH HILLS CONSTRUCTORS INC COMPETITIVE 5,167,242.00$ 0.90%

NORTH HILLS CONSTRUCTORS INC Total 5,167,242.00$ 0.90% 55.87%

MARK SCOTT CONSTRUCTION INC COMPETITIVE 5,162,559.34$ 0.90%

MARK SCOTT CONSTRUCTION INC Total 5,162,559.34$ 0.90% 56.77%

D A EDWARDS & CO COMPETITIVE 5,059,708.85$ 0.88%

D A EDWARDS & CO Total 5,059,708.85$ 0.88% 57.64%

LUSK MECHANICAL CONTR INC COMPETITIVE 5,016,170.98$ 0.87%

LUSK MECHANICAL CONTR INC Total 5,016,170.98$ 0.87% 58.52%

VOLMAR CONSTRUCTION INC COMPETITIVE 4,895,332.22$ 0.85%

VOLMAR CONSTRUCTION INC Total 4,895,332.22$ 0.85% 59.37%

G-W MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC COMPETITIVE 4,529,550.00$ 0.79%

G-W MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC Total 4,529,550.00$ 0.79% 60.15%

CHARTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY COMPETITIVE 4,479,946.50$ 0.78%

CHARTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Total 4,479,946.50$ 0.78% 60.93%

EDA CONTRACTORS INC COMPETITIVE 4,465,300.00$ 0.78%

EDA CONTRACTORS INC Total 4,465,300.00$ 0.78% 61.71%

PAUL J ROGAN CO INC COMPETITIVE 4,437,840.00$ 0.77%

PAUL J ROGAN CO INC Total 4,437,840.00$ 0.77% 62.48%

NUVERA FUEL CELLS LLC COMPETITIVE 4,417,786.00$ 0.77%

NUVERA FUEL CELLS LLC Total 4,417,786.00$ 0.77% 63.25%

J E NOVACK CONSTRUCTION CO COMPETITIVE 4,370,583.19$ 0.76%

J E NOVACK CONSTRUCTION CO Total 4,370,583.19$ 0.76% 64.00%


COBRA ROOFING SVCS INC COMPETITIVE 4,249,138.50$ 0.74%

COBRA ROOFING SVCS INC Total 4,249,138.50$ 0.74% 64.74%

LUNACON ENGINEERING GROUP CORP COMPETITIVE 4,133,856.09$ 0.72%

LUNACON ENGINEERING GROUP CORP Total 4,133,856.09$ 0.72% 65.46%

CON EDISON SOLUTIONS INC COMPETITIVE 4,025,381.08$ 0.70%

CON EDISON SOLUTIONS INC Total 4,025,381.08$ 0.70% 66.16%

SEA PAC ENGINEERING, INC COMPETITIVE 3,941,245.00$ 0.68%

SEA PAC ENGINEERING, INC Total 3,941,245.00$ 0.68% 66.84%

LINDY PAVING COMPETITIVE 3,825,864.50$ 0.66%

LINDY PAVING Total 3,825,864.50$ 0.66% 67.51%

WEIGANDT DEVELOPMENT LTD COMPETITIVE 3,820,185.70$ 0.66%

WEIGANDT DEVELOPMENT LTD Total 3,820,185.70$ 0.66% 68.17%

HAPPEL & ASSOCIATES INC COMPETITIVE 3,757,152.97$ 0.65%

HAPPEL & ASSOCIATES INC Total 3,757,152.97$ 0.65% 68.83%

AMKO DEVELOPMENT INC COMPETITIVE 3,425,486.28$ 0.60%

AMKO DEVELOPMENT INC Total 3,425,486.28$ 0.60% 69.42%

NATIONAL ROOFING PARTNERS COMPETITIVE 3,418,401.94$ 0.59%

NATIONAL ROOFING PARTNERS Total 3,418,401.94$ 0.59% 70.01%

CME BUILDERS & COMPETITIVE 3,293,855.34$ 0.57%

CME BUILDERS & Total 3,293,855.34$ 0.57% 70.59%

MILL CITY CONSTRUCTION COMPETITIVE 3,195,354.92$ 0.56%

MILL CITY CONSTRUCTION Total 3,195,354.92$ 0.56% 71.14%

WILSON & CO COMPETITIVE 3,122,402.28$ 0.54%

WILSON & CO Total 3,122,402.28$ 0.54% 71.68%

MID-WEST BUILDERS INC COMPETITIVE 3,006,882.91$ 0.52%

MID-WEST BUILDERS INC Total 3,006,882.91$ 0.52% 72.21%

SUNRISE COMMERCIAL CONTRACTING INC COMPETITIVE 2,963,570.40$ 0.51%

SUNRISE COMMERCIAL CONTRACTING INC Total 2,963,570.40$ 0.51% 72.72%

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO REQUIRED SOURCE - LEGALLY MANDATED 2,883,039.29$ 0.50%

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO Total 2,883,039.29$ 0.50% 73.22%

SEA BREEZE GENERAL CONST COMPETITIVE 2,851,400.00$ 0.50%

SEA BREEZE GENERAL CONST Total 2,851,400.00$ 0.50% 73.72%

CONSTRUCTCO INC COMPETITIVE 2,839,369.74$ 0.49%

CONSTRUCTCO INC Total 2,839,369.74$ 0.49% 74.21%

GOEBEL PG&U INC COMPETITIVE 2,833,856.69$ 0.49%

GOEBEL PG&U INC Total 2,833,856.69$ 0.49% 74.70%

BISHOP INC COMPETITIVE 2,813,986.00$ 0.49%

BISHOP INC Total 2,813,986.00$ 0.49% 75.19%

AAR OF NORTH CAROLINA INC COMPETITIVE 2,703,020.00$ 0.47%

AAR OF NORTH CAROLINA INC Total 2,703,020.00$ 0.47% 75.66%

HOMER CONTRACTING INC COMPETITIVE 2,687,148.78$ 0.47%

HOMER CONTRACTING INC Total 2,687,148.78$ 0.47% 76.13%

DOW ELECTRIC INC COMPETITIVE 2,646,462.24$ 0.46%

DOW ELECTRIC INC Total 2,646,462.24$ 0.46% 76.59%

DURA PIER FACILITIES SERVICES LTD COMPETITIVE 2,492,549.53$ 0.43%

DURA PIER FACILITIES SERVICES LTD Total 2,492,549.53$ 0.43% 77.02%

SIERRA CONSTRUCTION LLC COMPETITIVE 2,458,052.09$ 0.43%

SIERRA CONSTRUCTION LLC Total 2,458,052.09$ 0.43% 77.45%

CH2M HILL NEW YORK INC COMPETITIVE 2,440,526.30$ 0.42%

CH2M HILL NEW YORK INC Total 2,440,526.30$ 0.42% 77.87%

WIGHT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC COMPETITIVE 2,437,183.69$ 0.42%

WIGHT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC Total 2,437,183.69$ 0.42% 78.29%

NATIONS ROOF LLC COMPETITIVE 2,410,642.75$ 0.42%

NATIONS ROOF LLC Total 2,410,642.75$ 0.42% 78.71%

SG CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC COMPETITIVE 2,364,003.04$ 0.41%

SG CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC Total 2,364,003.04$ 0.41% 79.12%

TUFF SHED INC COMPETITIVE 2,290,848.84$ 0.40%

TUFF SHED INC Total 2,290,848.84$ 0.40% 79.52%

BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHITECTS INCCOMPETITIVE 2,051,482.89$ 0.36%

BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHITECTS INC Total 2,051,482.89$ 0.36% 79.88%

I L LONG CONSTRUCTION CO INC COMPETITIVE 2,036,683.29$ 0.35%

I L LONG CONSTRUCTION CO INC Total 2,036,683.29$ 0.35% 80.23%


APPENDIX D

Contract Commitments and Competitive Classifications From FPDS-NG

CA Report

The Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS-NG) captures and reports summary-level contract actions and commitment information for agencies using appropriated funds as specified in FAR 4.6. The CA report within FPDS-NG from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, contains contract actions for 66 departments totaling $431.4B in contractual commitments. The following table provides the total actions, commitments, competed actions, % competed actions, competed commitments, and % competed commitments for the departments listed in the report.


Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS)

For the period: October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016

Department Total Actions Total Dollars Competed Actions % Competed Actions Competed Dollars % Competed Dollars

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS( 0300 ) 4 $0.00 4 100.00% $0.00 0.00%

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE( 0500 ) 652 $52,907,656.65 494 75.77% $45,730,179.35 86.43%

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT( 1100 ) 805 $62,218,680.41 501 62.24% $49,701,705.14 79.88%

PEACE CORPS( 1145 ) 810 $61,403,737.35 508 62.72% $49,886,920.28 81.24%

UNITED STATES TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY( 1153 ) 326 $15,512,114.92 262 80.37% $12,660,668.70 81.62%

AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF( 1200 ) 75,078 $5,586,652,410.28 55,512 73.94% $4,685,934,451.33 83.88%

COMMERCE, DEPARTMENT OF( 1300 ) 27,052 $3,182,644,942.60 18,686 69.07% $2,417,760,347.34 75.97%

INTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE( 1400 ) 70,004 $4,387,941,856.43 51,873 74.10% $3,409,711,310.78 77.71%

JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF( 1500 ) 134,009 $7,250,721,942.31 102,245 76.30% $5,249,549,949.20 72.40%

LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF( 1600 ) 7,762 $1,814,641,485.50 4,630 59.65% $1,002,836,755.55 55.26%

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION( 1665 ) 1,369 $325,187,350.58 1,021 74.58% $285,627,123.83 87.83%

STATE, DEPARTMENT OF( 1900 ) 86,151 $8,715,834,030.66 63,730 73.97% $6,401,850,803.26 73.45%

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION: U.S.-MEXICO( 19BM ) 918 $56,384,209.22 520 56.64% $41,581,597.70 73.75%

TREASURY, DEPARTMENT OF THE( 2000 ) 20,787 $6,150,013,487.89 12,744 61.31% $5,334,105,019.12 86.73%

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT( 2400 ) 2,211 $932,583,623.31 1,395 63.09% $736,076,527.53 78.93%

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION( 2700 ) 639 $96,867,371.87 472 73.87% $83,472,240.28 86.17%

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION( 2800 ) 5,537 $1,380,827,645.07 3,394 61.30% $834,062,874.26 60.40%

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION( 2900 ) 680 $66,623,737.74 190 27.94% $35,526,338.99 53.32%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION( 3100 ) 1,945 $207,641,579.07 1,128 57.99% $157,351,726.56 75.78%

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION( 3300 ) 2,961 $274,462,846.86 1,032 34.85% $184,330,437.04 67.16%

J. F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS( 3352 ) 6 $161,853.46 5 83.33% $149,745.66 92.52%

NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART( 3355 ) 565 $32,420,013.62 347 61.42% $20,984,016.03 64.73%

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION( 3400 ) 238 $13,590,764.01 115 48.32% $10,324,747.21 75.97%

VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF( 3600 ) 4,449,334 $22,206,537,989.28 4,192,739 94.23% $17,941,991,475.36 80.80%

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD( 4100 ) 65 $783,935.13 41 63.08% $332,307.45 42.39%

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION( 4500 ) 733 $40,316,658.12 216 29.47% $11,934,048.82 29.60%

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION( 4700 ) 151,819 $10,087,337,414.70 135,713 89.39% $8,165,849,819.68 80.95%

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION( 4900 ) 1,036 $416,782,487.86 646 62.36% $368,295,618.17 88.37%

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION( 5000 ) 2,884 $419,247,044.41 1,712 59.36% $318,198,832.64 75.90%

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY( 5400 ) 35 $652,024.72 28 80.00% $306,542.62 47.01%

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES( 5900 ) 101 $3,725,774.98 62 61.39% $2,723,119.18 73.09%

NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS( 5920 ) 14 $303,355.97 11 78.57% $104,137.21 34.33%

NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES( 5940 ) 72 $2,698,904.00 25 34.72% $1,112,085.00 41.21%

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD( 6000 ) 557 $40,260,935.18 424 76.12% $35,128,205.34 87.25%

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION( 6100 ) 717 $30,002,307.72 224 31.24% $13,082,416.11 43.60%

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD( 6300 ) 357 $20,187,110.12 277 77.59% $17,651,599.87 87.44%

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION( 6500 ) 85 $1,748,150.15 53 62.35% $1,240,869.51 70.98%

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY( 6800 ) 15,271 $1,386,712,152.88 12,100 79.24% $1,187,277,192.43 85.62%

TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF( 6900 ) 24,388 $6,621,384,759.37 17,643 72.34% $5,644,383,009.39 85.24%

HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF( 7000 ) 82,755 $13,420,729,606.51 57,362 69.32% $9,580,130,369.20 71.38%

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION( 7100 ) 290 $31,717,283.82 217 74.83% $24,395,812.25 76.92%

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT( 7200 ) 10,154 $4,579,200,634.37 7,903 77.83% $3,758,520,950.75 82.08%

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION( 7300 ) 1,273 $104,635,148.71 868 68.19% $76,401,353.59 73.02%

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF( 7500 ) 86,234 $23,939,238,911.43 55,213 64.03% $20,505,253,742.46 85.66%

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION( 8000 ) 29,891 $17,273,658,851.99 20,694 69.23% $11,978,963,347.56 69.35%

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF( 8600 ) 2,118 $1,015,635,542.05 1,008 47.59% $699,347,050.51 68.86%

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION( 8800 ) 1,231 $163,218,478.89 885 71.89% $113,115,245.59 69.30%

ENERGY, DEPARTMENT OF( 8900 ) 12,768 $28,260,762,804.70 8,108 63.50% $26,647,785,685.37 94.29%

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION( 8961 ) 156 $13,683,693.23 121 77.56% $10,728,018.02 78.40%

EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF( 9100 ) 3,318 $2,456,086,255.17 2,563 77.25% $2,066,516,502.84 84.14%

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE( 9300 ) 73 $5,184,886.38 49 67.12% $4,087,223.52 78.83%

NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION( 9502 ) 46 $1,699,883.01 45 97.83% $1,659,766.01 97.64%

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION( 9506 ) 122 $11,068,107.66 81 66.39% $7,596,666.10 68.64%

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION( 9507 ) 606 $70,115,781.90 356 58.75% $53,029,481.60 75.63%

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD( 9508 ) 255 $10,312,966.66 162 63.53% $8,020,006.77 77.77%

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION( 9514 ) 17 $1,036,274.76 17 100.00% $1,036,274.76 100.00%

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD( 9516 ) 69 $5,150,947.53 30 43.48% $1,578,696.12 30.65%

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY( 9542 ) 2 $494,902.10 2 100.00% $494,902.10 100.00%

MILLENIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION( 9543 ) 740 $102,523,226.71 658 88.92% $98,648,956.88 96.22%

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU( 955F ) 569 $83,799,073.60 462 81.20% $76,017,576.81 90.71%

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD( 9565 ) 94 $1,751,045.19 55 58.51% $1,167,309.01 66.66%

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS( 9568 ) 7,761 $158,736,107.10 6,991 90.08% $122,149,518.65 76.95%

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE( 9577 ) 892 $64,776,446.63 767 85.99% $57,593,601.08 88.91%

COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY( 9594 ) 345 $13,085,959.97 256 74.20% $10,514,193.28 80.35%

PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY( 959P ) 8 $76,734.12 5 62.50% $54,694.62 71.28%

DEPT OF DEFENSE( 9700 ) 11,376,528 $257,676,845,581.60 10,955,363 96.30% $132,019,226,077.31 51.23%

Total 16,706,292 $431,411,149,480.19 15,802,963 94.59% $272,682,859,786.68 63.21%

Total Excluding DOD 5,329,764 173,734,303,899 4,847,600 90.95% 140,663,633,709 80.96%


APPENDIX E

Noncompetitive Purchases — Management Instruction

(SP S2-2011-1)

In addition to the SPs and Ps, the noncompetitive purchase management instruction (MI) outlines the noncompetitive process. The MI is available internally on the Postal Service intranet site at: http://blue.usps.gov/cpim/ftp/manage/sps2111.pdf.

The MI is attached for external readers who do not have access to the Postal Service intranet site.

Sps2111.pdf

http://blue.usps.gov/cpim/ftp/manage/sps2111.pdf


APPENDIX F

Contracting Data Definitions

For purposes of this report, the following contract-related data terms and definitions are provided as follows:

Contract Action: a new contract, delivery order, task order, work order, modification to,

or termination of, a contract

Commitments: funding that is added to a contract against which payments are made. Commitments may extend over multiple fiscal years and are equivalent to contract obligations as reported by other agencies in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS-NG). However, not all contracts have committed funds. Therefore, the total committed values of the contracts will be different than spend against contracts within a fiscal year. An example of a non-committed contract is an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract that has a contractual minimum but orders are placed via the Postal Service on-catalog ordering system (eBuy2); the spend will occur against the contract but there will be no contractual commitments above the minimums of the contract. Commitments also include de-commitments that may occur during the life of a contract due to a reduction in scope or at the end of a contract during the contract close-out process to remove committed funds not spent.

Non-Personnel Operating Expenses: expenses reported in the Postal Service 10-K

and consisting of transportation and other expenses. The majority of the non-personnel operating expenses are based on “spend” (defined below) but also include some financial adjustments based on 10-K reporting standards. Capital spend within the year is reflected via depreciation over multiple years.

Spend: payments to suppliers within a fiscal year. Spend may be for expense or capital purchases throughout the year. Spend may also be offset by credits from suppliers. This CA report does not classify spend into competitive or noncompetitive because spend may be against contracts awarded in previous years that have not been updated to reflect the competitive/noncompetitive classification. Spend may also be for local purchases (less than $10K) and thus not against a contract but through credit cards or other local payment methods.


APPENDIX G

Executive Leadership Team referenced in report; table 5, page 10

CFO: Chief Financial Officer. Joseph Corbett.

CHRO: Chief Human Resources Officer. Jeffrey Williamson.

CIO: Chief Information Officer. Kristin Seaver.

CMSO: Chief Marketing and Sales Officer. Jim Cochrane.

COO: Chief Operating Officer. David Williams.

CPI: Chief Postal Inspector. Guy Cottrell.

DPG: Deputy Postmaster General. Ronald Stroman.

u.s. postal service competition report fiscal year 2016 competition report fiscal year 2016 page 4...

Documents