upmifa, ppa, and other letters a spelling bee for charitable funds november 9, 2007 ben blanton katy...
TRANSCRIPT
UPMIFA, PPA, and Other Letters
A Spelling Bee for Charitable Funds
November 9, 2007 Ben Blanton
Katy Ruhl© 2007 Baker & Daniels
2
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“PPA”)
Reforming nation’s pension system Charitable contributions Tax-exempt organizations
3
Background
Code section 501(c)(3) exemption Private foundations
– Net Investment Income Tax– Self-dealing– Minimum Payout– Excess Business Holdings– Jeopardy Investments – Taxable Expenditures
4
Public Charities
Churches Schools, colleges and universities Nonprofit hospitals Fundraising organizations that benefit public
colleges and universities Governmental units Publicly supported charities Publicly operated charities Supporting organizations
5
Supporting Organizations
Type I - operated, supervised, or controlled by
Type II - supervised or controlled in connection with
Type III - operated in connection with
6
Charitable Reforms in PPA
Donor advised funds– Separately identified by reference to
contributions of one or more donors– Owned and controlled by a public charity (the
“sponsoring organization”)– Donor (or the donor’s appointee or designee)
has, or reasonably expects to have, advisory privileges with respect to the distribution or investment of funds
7
Exceptions– Sole designated beneficiary
Distributions only to one identified charitable organization or governmental entity
– Scholarship funds Committee, all of the members of which are
appointed by the sponsoring organization No donor, donor advisor, or related person
control Objective and nondiscriminatory procedure
Charitable Reforms in PPA (cont.)
8
Additional exceptions– Secretary of the Treasury exemptions if:
Committee not directly or indirectly controlled by the donor, donor advisor, or related persons, or
Fund benefits a single identified charitable purpose
Charitable Reforms in PPA (cont.)
9
Permitted and Prohibited Distributions
Permits distributions to –– Public charities– Sponsoring public charity– Donor advised funds– “Expenditure responsibility”
Prohibits distributions to –– Type III supporting organization (not “functionally
integrated”) – Entity controlled by donor, donor advisor, or related
party
10
Excess Benefit Transactions
“Excess benefit transaction” now includes: – Any payment from a donor advised fund to a
donor or the donor's appointee/designee, family members, and 35 percent-controlled entities Excess benefit is the entire payment
– Payments to investment advisors exceeding FMV
11
Reporting Requirements for Donor Advised Funds
Form 990– Total number of donor advised funds– Aggregate value– Aggregate contributions received and grants
paid
Form 1023– Intent to maintain donor advised funds
12
More Charitable Reforms
Supporting Organizations– Codification of Type I, Type II, and Type III
definitions– No donations to Type I and Type III
supporting organizations from persons who control supported organizations
– Minimum payout for Type III supporting organizations that are not “functionally integrated”
13
Excess Benefit Transactions
“Excess benefit transaction” by a supporting organization includes payments to a substantial contributor, family members, or 35 percent-controlled entities
Entire amounts constitute excess benefits Disqualified persons of supporting
organizations deemed disqualified persons of supported organizations
14
Private Foundation Payments No payments to Type III supporting organizations
that are not “functionally integrated” No payments to:
– Supporting organizations controlled (directly or indirectly) by disqualified persons
– Supporting organizations whose supported organizations are controlled (directly or indirectly) by disqualified persons
No payments if the Secretary determines them to be otherwise “inappropriate”
15
Reporting Requirements
$25,000 filing threshold does not apply to supporting organizations
Form 990 must: – Identify supported organizations– Indicate Type I, Type II, or Type III– Certify not controlled by “disqualified
persons”
16
UPMIFA
Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act
Replaces UMIFA Addresses expenditure and retention of
assets in institutional and endowment funds
Effective July 1, 2007
17
How Does UPMIFA Update UMIFA?
Broader in application than UMIFA New and more flexible options with respect to
expenditures from endowment funds Introduces a new method through which an
institution may modify or release certain restrictions without court or donor approval
Specifies additional factors and circumstances that all charitable institutions should consider in making investment and management decisions
18
UMIFA vs. UPMIFA
UMIFA applied to:– Approved institutions of higher learning and their
related foundations,– Non-religious Code section 501(c)(3) organizations
with an endowment fund with a value of at least ten million dollars, and
– Community foundations or trusts,
…whose governing boards voluntarily and affirmatively had adopted UMIFA’s provisions
19
UMIFA vs. UPMIFA
UPMIFA– Applies more broadly to virtually all charitable
institutions, including private foundations, community foundations, religious entities, and other charities
– No requirement that an institution’s board of directors affirmatively adopt the law for it to apply
20
Endowment Fund – An institutional fund, or any part of an
institutional fund, that is not wholly expendable by the institution on a current basis under the terms of the applicable gift instrument
– Does not include assets that an institution voluntarily (i.e., not pursuant to a gift instrument) has designated as an endowment fund from which expenditures are limited
Background Definitions
21
Institutional Fund - A fund held by an institution exclusively for charitable purposes
Institution - Any entity that is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes
Background Definitions
22
Gift Instrument – Any record, including solicitations prepared
by the institution, under which property is granted or transferred to or held by an institution as an institutional fund
– A community foundation’s fund agreement with a donor should constitute a gift instrument under this definition
Background Definitions
23
Importance of Gift Instrument Provisions
Specific gift instrument language trumps UPMIFA spending provisions
UPMIFA: merely a default rule of construction where a donor has not given specific instructions to the contrary
24
Spending from Endowment Funds: The Rules under the Old UMIFA Statute
Permitted an institution to spend, from the amount of a fund that exceeded “historic dollar value,” as much as the governing board deemed prudent
Historic Dollar Value:– The amount originally donated– Any subsequent gifts to the fund– Any accumulation to the fund directed by the
gift instrument (or fund agreement)
25
Spending from Endowment Funds: The Current Rules under UPMIFA
Eliminates UMIFA’s historic dollar value approach
Permits an institution, subject to the terms of any applicable gift instrument, to “appropriate or accumulate so much of an endowment fund that the institution determines is prudent for the uses, benefits, purposes, and duration of the endowment fund”
26
What Is Prudent?
The institution must act in good faith, with the care a prudent person acting in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances
27
What Is Prudent?
The institution must consider the following factors:1. Duration and preservation of the endowment fund2. Purposes of the institution and of the endowment fund3. General economic conditions4. Possible effects of inflation or deflation5. Expected total return from income and the
appreciation of investments6. Other resources of the institution7. The investment policy of the institution
28
Spending from Endowment Funds: Rules of Construction for Gift Agreements under UPMIFA
To override UPMIFA, the applicable gift instrument must specifically state a limitation on the institution’s authority to accumulate or appropriate the endowment fund
General language in the gift agreement that:– Designates the gift as an endowment– Directs the institution to use only income, interest,
dividends, rents, issues, or profits – Similarly directs the institution to protect the principal
...does not limit the authority of the institution to appropriate or accumulate the fund under the default provisions of UPMIFA
29
Release and Modification Rules
Written Consent from Donor Court Action New Modification/Release Provision
under UPMIFA
30
New Modification/Release Provision under UPMIFA
An institution may unilaterally release or modify a restriction in a gift instrument if: A. Restriction is unlawful, impracticable,
impossible, or wasteful;B. Value of the fund is less than $25,000;C. Fund is over twenty years old;D. Fund is used in a manner consistent with the
gift instrument; ANDE. Institution provides 60-day notice to the Indiana
Attorney General
31
Factors to consider in making decisions:1. Donor intent
2. Duty of loyalty
3. Good faith, with ordinary prudent care
4. Incur only reasonable costs
5. Reasonable effort to verify relevant facts
General – Investment and Management Provisions
32
Factors to consider in making decisions:6. Make investment and management decisions
in light of: General economic conditions Possible effects of inflation or deflation Possible tax consequences Role of each investment in relation to the overall investment
portfolio Expected total return Other resources of the institution Needs to make distributions and to preserve capital, and Relationship or value of an asset to charitable purposes
General – Investment and Management Provisions
33
Factors to consider in making decisions:7. Make decisions in the context of an overall
investment strategy
8. Diversify investments unless special circumstances exist
9. Dispose of unsuitable assets
10.Utilize any special skills or expertise possessed by the institution or managers
General – Investment and Management Provisions
34
Note: UPMIFA allows an institution to retain property contributed by a donor as long as the governing board of the institution considers it advisable to do so
General – Investment and Management Provisions
35
CASE STUDIESGrants to Non-501(c)(3)s
Donor establishes donor advised fund Recommends making grant to Code section
501(c)(19) local veterans organization Analysis / Considerations
– Code section 4966 (taxable distributions)– Expenditure Responsibility– What if fund is not a donor advised fund?
36
CASE STUDIESBroad Applicability of UPMIFA
Community foundation chose, several years ago, not to adopt UMIFA
Required actions / options re UPMIFA?– Board action required to adopt?– Ways to avoid applicability?
Analysis / Considerations
37
CASE STUDIESApplying UPMIFA to Old Fund Agreements
25-year-old endowment fund Fund agreement: “The original gift value must be
maintained” Analysis / Considerations
– Donor Intent (IC 30-2-12-9)– Donor Consent to Modify (IC 30-2-12-13(a))
Note: adding versus dropping restrictions at a donor’s request
– Court Petition (IC 30-2-12-13(c) and (d))– Unilateral Release / Modification (IC 30-2-12-13(e))
38
CASE STUDIESDesignated Funds
Donor establishing fund to benefit single charity Charity expected to take on large community
project Desire to make distributions for project
expenses, as well as directly to charity Analysis / Considerations
– Component part regulations for designated funds– Definition of DAF and exceptions – Taxable distributions from donor advised funds
39
CASE STUDIESCharitable IRA Distributions to Donor
Advised Funds
Elderly donor establishing donor advised fund Wants to take advantage of IRA provision of
PPA Analysis / Considerations
– 4 major requirements (age, qualified recipient, dollar limitation, expiration date)
– Note regarding pending legislation
40
CASE STUDIESReceipt of Investment Advice from Donors
Donor establishing fund to benefit single charity Donor requests particular investment advisor Analysis / Considerations
– Component part regulations Ultimate control by Board Ban on agreements establishing irrevocable relationships
re management, investment, etc. Board power to replace agent for breach of fiduciary duty Board power to replace agent for failure to produce
reasonable return
– Impact on DAF analysis? What if fund to be created were a field of interest rather than designated fund?