updates from ode and oec: ohio’s work special... · seclusion, by disability (idea) status in...
TRANSCRIPT
Updates from ODE and OEC: Ohio’s Work
Agenda
What we learned during the regional summits
Ohio’s APR Data
Updates: Federal and State
Regional Summits
Graduation data causes frustration – What do we do about it?
Climate and discipline practices
ESSA Impact
Students with Disabilities
238,285 or
14.2%
STUDENTS WITH
DISABILITIES
Who?
Autism Deaf-Blind
Emotional
Hearing
Multiple Disabilities
Intellectual Disability
Other Health Impairement
Orthopedic Specific Learning Disability
Speech
Traumatic Brain Injury
Vision
Developmental Delay
Autism Deaf-Blind
Emotional
Hearing
Multiple Disabilities
Intellectual Disability
Other Health Impairement
Orthopedic Specific Learning Disability
Speech
Traumatic Brain Injury
Vision
Developmental Delay
Education Environments
(Indicator 5a)
Number of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21
served inside the regular classroom ≥80.00% of the
day
58.70% 62.00% 62.81% 63.92% 65.13%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16
Full Inclusion Target
Reading Proficiency
59.5% 63.2% 66.2% 60.2% 59.6%
53.0%
75.4%
97.0% 98.8%
27.3% 25.5% 26.1% 18.9% 19.0% 16.3%
40.9%
64.5% 69.6%
3rdGrade
4thGrade
5thGrade
6thGrade
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
11thGrade
12thGrade
2015-2016
Typical SWD
88.0% 88.0% 88.0% 88.0% 87.0% 87.0% 87.0% 87.0%
85.8% 85.4% 85.7%
84.7%
87.3% 86.8%
87.3%
86.0%
80%81%82%83%84%85%86%87%88%89%90%
4th GradeReading
8th GradeReading
4th GradeMath
8th GradeMath
Students with Disabilities Participating in Regular State Assessments
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Alternate Assessment Participation
How are Students Exiting School?
Dropout Rates
22%
17%
24%
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Percent of Students with Disabilities Exiting Services by Dropping Out
33% or 70%?
Which Graduation Rate?
Dropped Out 19%
Transferred to Regular Education
6%
[CATEGORY NAME]
70%
Other [PERCENTAGE]
How Ohio Students Left Special Education in 2016: Ohio Calculation
Dropped Out 19%
Transferred to Regular Education
6%
Graduated with a Diploma
33%
Graduated with a Certificate
42%
How Ohio Students Left Special Education in 2016: Federal Calculation
Ohio Enrollment and Suspension
14.5%
2.1%
16.5%
5.2% 4.8%
71.1%
28.0%
0.4%
49.1%
5.3% 6.5%
38.6%
SWD Asian Black Hispanic Multiracial White
Percentage of Total Enrollment and Total Suspensions by Student Group
% of Total Enrollment % of Total Out-of-School Suspensions
Restraint and Seclusion Practices
85%
19%
37%
15% 81% 63%
Enrollment Physical restraint Seclusion
Percentage of Ohio students subjected to physical restraint or seclusion, by disability (IDEA) status in 2014-2015
Students without disabilities Students with disabilities
The Annual Performance Report
Results and Meaningful Outcomes
for Students with Disabilities
Annual Performance Report • Submitted
February 1, 2017
• Based on 2015-2016 data
• Covers compliance and student outcome indicators, just like District Special Education Profiles
Ohio’s Performance Indicators with Progress Indicators with Slippage
Assessment participation (3b) Graduation rates (1) School-age LRE (5) Dropout rates (2) Preschool LRE (6) Discipline discrepancies (4a) Preschool outcomes (7) Parent involvement (8) Disproportionality (10) Post-school outcomes (14) Resolution sessions (15) Mediation agreements (16)
3 Years with Different Assessments
44.12%
55.11%
34.19% 38.56%
28.57% 24.18%
Math Reading
SWD Proficient or Above
13-14(OAA)
14-15(PARCC)
15-16(AIR)
3 Years with Different Assessments
85.93% 90.80% 78.40% 83.80%
70.00% 68.20%
Math Reading
Typical Students Proficient or Above
13-14(OAA)
14-15(PARCC)
15-16(AIR)
What Is IOhio’s Work? INCLUSIVITY
Updates:
Federal &
State
Significant Guidance Supporting text font: Arial 32
USDOE: OSER Guide
Equity Equity in IDEA: Significant Disproportionality Final Regulations
OSEP Dear Colleague Letter related to
Preschool Least Restrictive Environment
Every Student Succeeds Act
Supporting the Whole Child
ESSA School Quality Indicator
• Student engagement • School climate • Access to advanced coursework • Discipline • Chronic Absenteeism
Ohio HB 410
School Discipline
– Education in the midst of school removal
School Truancy
– An Absence Intervention Team
Initiatives and Work Positively Addressing School Climate, Social Emotional Learning and Discipline
Early Language and
Literacy
Ohio Dean’s Compact & CEEDAR
• Innovation – • Teacher preparation and Renewal • Address service needs in the state • Ongoing problem solving and re-design
• OPPORTUNITY, INCLUSIVITY and
POSSIBILITIES
Responsibility of a School District of Residence to Ensure Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to its Students with Disabilities in Separate Public
or Private Facilities
Redesigning and Re-tooling
ESSA: A Focus on Vulnerable Students
VULNERABLE STUDENTS
& CONTINUOUS
IMPROVEMENT
STUDENTS WITH
DISABILITIES
DELINQUENT
FOSTER CARE
HOMELESS
MIGRANT
MILITARY
ENGLISH LEARNERS
What Is Our Work?
education.ohio.gov
Join the Conversation
@OHEducation @OHEducationSupt
OHEducation
OhioEdDept
OHEducation
education.ohio.gov/Text