updates for medicine & surgery exams in year 5
DESCRIPTION
Curriculum Retreat 2007. Updates for Medicine & Surgery Exams in Year 5. Comparing Outcomes from New and Old Curricula. Paul B. S. Lai HBP Surgery, CUHK. 8 September 2007. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Updates for Medicine & Surgery Exams in Year 5
Curriculum Retreat 2007
Comparing Outcomes from New and Old Curricula
8 September 2007
Paul B. S. LaiHBP Surgery, CUHK
Med 5 Exam:
students from old curriculum vs.first batch of new curriculum graduatesvs. second batch of new curriculum graduates
Exam format for med 5
Medicine
Final MB examination in Medicine
History
Short case 1Short case 2
Format
• Three sessions of 20 minutes A: History (in Cantonese)
B: Short case I– CNS– CVS– Endo OR Joints OR ECG OR CT/MRI
C: Short case II– Abdo– RS– Fundi OR Skin OR X-ray/CT scan
Clinical score Written score
2005-2006 54.3% 54.1%
2006-2007 53.7% 55.7%
P = 0.043 P < 0.001
Comparison of Scores in Medicine(Class 2006 vs. 2007)
Exam format for med 5
Surgery
Change in Final Surgery Exam
2005/2006• Written papers
- paper 1 (MCQs) [4 hrs]- paper 2 (R-type MCQs +
MEQs) [3 hrs]
• OSCE – 2 hrs & 10 mins for 21
effective stations and 5 rest stations
– total 21 stations and 20 of them carrying marks
2006/2007• Written (50%) & OSCE
(50%)– paper 1 (MCQs) [3 hrs]– paper 2 (R-type MCQs +
MEQs) [3 hrs]– OSCE [1 hrs & 35 mins for 13
effective stations and 3 rest stations]
• Clinical examination– Two pairs of examiners, 20
minutes each (i.e. total of 40 minutes of short to intermediate cases)
Since examination format changed, cannot compare performance by their marks like last year.
Exam results for med 5
Medicine & Surgery
Linear Regression
0 50 100 150
rank_m
0
50
100
150
ran
k_s
rank_s = 32.47 + 0.57 * rank_mR-Square = 0.32
Correlation between marks in medicine and marks in surgery at final MB 2007
If we use the ranking in the class to correlate, the R-Square was 0.32 (but still significant).[Pearson correlation of 0.57 if we use simple correlation for ranking in the class]
Model Summaryb
.654a .428 .424 1.71579 .428 110.752 1 148 .000Model1
R R SquareAdjustedR Square
Std. Error ofthe Estimate
R SquareChange F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
Change Statistics
Predictors: (Constant), MARK_Sa.
Dependent Variable: MARK_Mb.
Linear Regression
45.00 50.00 55.00
mark_m
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
mar
k_s
mark_s = -46.05 + 1.97 * mark_mR-Square = 0.43
Correlation between marks in medicine and marks in surgery at final MB 2007
If we use numerical marks in the class to correlate, the R-Square was 0.428 (P <0.001)
Surgery (written + OSCE)
Surgery (clinical exam)
Surgery class rank
Candidate no.
Medicine class rank
Medicine (combined written and clinical)
Remarks for medicine
47.24% 30.0% 149 56 148 48.84% Fail in medicine
42.41% 35.0% 148 104 150 45.00% Fail in medicine
51.39% 25.0% 150 117 144 50.58% Pass in Medicine
51.82% 40.0% 147 124 136 51.86% Pass in Medicine
Students Failing Surgery(Class 2006-2007)
Medicine (combined written and clinical)
Medicine class rank
Candidate no.
Surgery (written + OSCE)
Surgery (clinical exam)
Surgery class rank
Remarks for surgery
48.85% 148 56 47.24% 30% 149 Failed in surgery too
49.16% 147 68 52.57% 50% 143 Pass in surgery
47.74% 149 78 50.89% 55% 136 Pass in surgery
45.00% 150 104 42.41% 35% 148 Failed in surgery too
49.81% 146 132 57.62% 45% 142 Pass in surgery
50.67% 143 134 64.45% 60% 78 Pass in surgery
Students Failing Medicine(Class 2006-2007)
Possible Explanations
• Both medicine and surgery in the final years call for a lot of clinical skills, knowledge of clinical management, as well as basic scientific knowledge
• Examination formats are very similar – written (MCQs, R-type, MEQs), OSCE, clinical examination, etc.
• For those students who were weak in years 1-4 years, they would not have time to catch up as year 5 would be a very tight year for this group of students
Exam results for med 5
Does it matter where the students came from?
Combined Grades of Medicine & Surgery(Class 2006-2007)
Total no. of students
Group A
(good performance)
Group B
(average performance)
Group C
(bad performance)
JUPAS 100 16 (16%) 69 (69%) 15 (15%)
Non-JUPAS 15 1 (7%) 8 (53%) 6 (40%)
EAS 27 9 (33%) 17 (63%) 1 (4%)
Internal Transfer
1 0 1 0
End of day 4 (pull-up and distinction viva) – all the external examiners were shattered
Examiners in Medicine had a good time