unt digital library/67531/metadc330656/... · eg ekpo, koko okon akpan, a historical review of...

332
37<? /VfiVdf //o, / 9 y ? A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF EDUCATION IN NIGERIA WITH EMPHASIS UPON SECONDARY EDUCATION IN CROSS RIVER STATE DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Koko Okon Akpan Ekpo, B.S., M.Ed, Denton, Texas December, 1982

Upload: others

Post on 17-Feb-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 37

  • eg

    Ekpo, Koko Okon Akpan, A Historical Review of Educa-

    tion in Nigeria with Emphasis upon Secondary Education in

    Cross River State. Doctor of Philosophy (Secondary

    Education/Curriculum Studies), December, 1982, 321 pp.,

    37 tables, 8 figures, bibliography, 161 titles.

    The purposes of this study are to describe the past

    and the present systems of secondary education in the

    Cross River State of Nigeria; to examine the goals,

    achievements, and failures of each with special considera-

    tion for the period from 1970 to 1981; and to make

    recommendations for improvement of the secondary educa-

    tional system in the Cross River State of Nigeria.

    This study is concerned with a concise but broad

    historical review of secondary education in the Cross

    River State of Nigeria. An analysis of the historical

    evolution of the federation reveals that the forces

    underlying Nigeria's educational problems include the

    piecemeal acquisition and administration of different areas

    of the country, and with fragmented and disorganized public

    policy during the Colonial period. For instance, the

    policy of restricting Christian missionary activity in the

    North, while giving access to missionary initiatives in the

    South contributed to uneven social and educational develop-

    ment between the North and the South, and resulted in

    additional inter-regional tensions.

  • The review of the related literature consists of three

    sections. The first section discusses education as it

    existed prior to the Colonial rule. The second section

    concentrates on the development of secondary education in

    Cross River State of Nigeria during the British rule.

    The third section is devoted to secondary educational

    developments in Cross River State of Nigeria from 1960

    to the present. It identifies educational administrative

    measures, inspection, finance, structure, and organization,

    the education of secondary school teachers, and the educa-

    tional problems which influenced the system during the

    period.

    The recommendations call for programmes that would

    lead to industrial and technological progress.

  • ©1983

    KOKO OKON AKPAN EKPO

    All Rights Reserved

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page

    LIST OF TABLES viii

    LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS i*

    Chapter

    I. INTRODUCTION 1

    Statement of the Problem Purposes of the Study Research Questions Definition of Terms Delimitations of the Study Background and Significance of the Study Research Design Summary Chapter Bibliography

    II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 25

    Introduction Purpose and Value of Educational Planning Traditional Education in Nigeria Educational Developments During the

    British Rule Educational Development after Political

    Independence Summary Chapter Bibliography

    III. TRADITIONAL EDUCATION IN CROSS RIVER STATE OF NIGERIA 65

    The Curriculum of Traditional Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Purposes of Traditional Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    i n

  • Teachers of Traditional Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Summary Chapter Bibliography

    IV. THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION SYSTEMS IN CROSS RIVER STATE OF NIGERIA: 1970-1981 83

    Introduction Philosophy of Nigerian Education Objectives of Education in Cross River

    State of Nigeria Structure and Organisation of the

    Ministry of Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Goals of Primary Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    The Development of Primary Education System in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Enrolment in the Primary Schools of Cross River State of Nigeria

    Number of Primary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Universal Primary Education (U.P.E.) Scheme in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Classrooms, Furniture and Equipment of U.P.E. Scheme in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Fears About the U.P.E. Scheme Management of Primary Schools in Cross

    River State of Nigeria Curriculum of Primary Schools in Cross

    River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981 Academic Qualifications of Primary School

    Teachers in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Criteria for the Selection of a Primary School Headmaster in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Financing Primary Education in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    In-service Education Programmes for Pri-mary School teachers in Cross River State of Nigeria

    External and Internal Constraints in Pri-mary Education in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    IV

  • Roles of Institutions of Higher Education in Primary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Future Plans in Cross River State of Nigeria for Expansion, Growth, and Improvement in the Primary Education Programme

    Development of Secondary Education System in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Goals of Secondary Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Number of Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Enrolment in the Secondary Schools of Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Number of Teachers' Training Colleges in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Goals of Teachers' Training Colleges in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Enrolment in Teachers' Training Colleges in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Admission into Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    World Bank Loan for Secondary Education Projects in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Achievements of the World Bank Loan for Secondary Education Projects in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Problems of World Bank Loan for Secondary Education Projects in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Management of Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    The State School Board Structure and Organisation of the State

    School Board of Cross River State of Nigeria

    Functions of the State School Board Campus Administration of Post-primary

    Institutions in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Curriculum of Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Curriculum of Secondary Commercial Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    v

  • Curriculum of Secondary Technical/Trade Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Curriculum of Teachers' Training Colleges in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Academic Qualifications of Secondary School Teachers in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1981

    Academic Qualifications of Teachers in Teachers in Secondary Grammer Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Academic Qualifications of Teachers in Secondary Commercial Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Academic Qualifications of Teachers in Secondary Technical/Vocational Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Academic Qualifications of Teachers in Teachers' Training Colleges in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Criteria for the Selection of a Secondary School Principal in Cross River State of Nigeria

    In-service Education for Secondary School Teachers in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Methods of Teaching in Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Guidance in Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Instructional Spaces in Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Equipment in Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Laboratories in Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Inspection of Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Financing Secondary Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    External and Internal Constraints in Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Higher Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    Roles of Insititutions of Higher Education In Secondary Education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    VI

  • Future Plans in Cross River State of Nigeria for Expansion, Growth, and Improvement in Secondary Education Programmes

    Summary Chapter Bibliography

    V. SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 207

    Summary Findings Conclusions Recommendations to the Government of

    Cross River State of Nigeria Recommendations for Future Studies Chapter Bibliography

    APPENDIXES .

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    250

    308

    vix

  • LIST OF TABLES

    Table Page

    I. School-age Population and Actual Enrolment in Primary Schools of Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1978/79 School Year 99

    II. Number of Primary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria: 1970-1978/79 School Year 106

    III. Number of Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria by Division: 1970-1976 138

  • LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

    Figure Page

    1. The General Organisational Patterns of All the Ministries of Education in Nigeria . . 101

    2. Organisational Structure of the Cross River State School Board 169

    3. Recommended Administrative Structure for Each Independent School District in Cross River State of Nigeria 170

    4. The Administrative Structure of Secondary, Technical, and Commerical Institutions Including Teachers' Training Colleges in the Ministry of Education of the Cross River State of Nigeria 171

  • CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    Nigeria lies within the tropics between latitudes

    4° and 14° north of the equator and longitudes 3° and 14°

    east of the Greenwich Meridian (21, p. 1). It is bounded

    on the west by the Republic of Dahomey, on the north by the

    Niger Republic, on the north-east by the Chad Republic,

    on the east by the Republic of Cameroun, and on the south

    by the Atlantic Ocean (21, p. 1). Nigeria, well watered

    by the Rivers Niger and Benue and their tributaries,

    has an area of 356,669 square miles [26, p. 459], an

    area equal to one-ninth of the United States or Texas

    and California put together, or France, Belgium,

    and Great Britain combined (10, p. 1). The population

    of Nigeria is believed to approach 100 million (16,

    p. 2). Its climate varies from tropical at the coast

    to sub-tropical further inland. There are two well-marked

    seasons: the dry season lasting from November to March

    and the rainy season from April to October (21, p. 1).

    Temperatures at the coast seldom rise above 90°F, but

    humidity is high. The climate is drier further north

    where extremes of temperature are more common, sometimes

    reaching as high as 110°F and falling to 50°F.

  • The political entity known as Nigeria came into

    existence in 1914 (21, p. 1). Prior to this date the part

    of the Sudanic belt which it occupies had a history that

    was essentially of the movement and fusion of peoples, the

    rise and fall of empires and the slave trade. Thereafter,

    the history became that of the establishment of Fulani

    rule over the Hausa communities of the north in the early

    19th century and the gradual imposition of British rule,

    which commenced from the south with the Cession of Lagos on

    August 6, 1861 (21, p. 1). Nigeria came into being in its

    present form when the two protectorates of Northern and

    Southern Nigeria were amalgamated by Frederick Lugard (6,

    p. 21). Flora Shaw, who later married Lugard, first

    suggested in an article for the London Times that the sev-

    eral British protectorates on the Niger be known collec-

    tively as Nigeria (17). Any country is, in a sense, an

    artificial creation. In the case of Nigeria, however,

    union was so sudden, and included such widely differing

    groups of peoples, that not only the British, who created it,

    but the inhabitants themselves have often doubted whether it

    could survive as a political entity (6, p. 23).

    Nigeria, the most populus black state in the world,

    became a sovereign state on October 1, 1960. Independence

    from Britain was achieved through nationalistic

    struggle—strikes, agitation, and mass protests.

  • There was no armed struggle (28, p. 1895). The civilian

    administration that ushered the country into political

    independence was elected through democratic elections held

    in 1959 (28, p. 1895). That government handed over power

    to a military government in January, 1966, after some

    sections of the Nigerian army had mutinied in reaction to

    widespread political unrest and violence in parts of the

    country.

    At that time, Nigeria was a federation led by a prime

    minister at the centre and four regional premiers. The

    general officer commanding the Nigerian Army took

    power as head of the federal military government and

    supreme commander of the armed forces. He tended to steer

    the country towards a unitary form of government. This

    was an unpopular move and after six months his government

    was overthrown, and he and one of his military governors

    and some army officers were killed (28, p. 1895).

    Nigeria's second military government lasted nine

    years. During this period, a civil war was fought to re-

    unite the country after a section of it had attempted to

    secede. The peace was won, because at the end of the

    war, the government declared that there was no victor and

    there was no vanquished. A general amnesty had been

    granted and war victims were rehabilitated. There was

    post-war reconstruction followed by an economic boom. By

  • now Nigeria had become a federation of twelve states in

    response to demands for the creation of new states.

    A third military government came into being in a

    bloodless coup on July 29, 1975. It announced a four-year

    programme that would terminate with the return to

    democratically-elected government and the shifting of the

    federal capital from Lagos to Abuja in the central part of

    the country in response to popular demands. It also

    created seven new states. The head of this government,

    the late General Murtala Muhammed, was killed in an

    abortive coup on February 13, 1976, after six dramatic

    months in office and was declared a national hero. His

    chief of staff, General Olusegun Obasanjo, was persuaded

    by his colleagues to take charge of the government and

    complete the programme embarked upon by his predecessor

    (28, p. 1895). On October 1, 1979, the Military Govern-

    ment handed over power to a civilian administration headed

    by Alhaji Shehu Usman Aliyu Shagari as Executive

    President with Dr. Alex Ekwueme as Vice-president (8,

    p. 44).

    The Cross River State of Nigeria was created on

    May 27, 1967. It is one of the twelve states that were

    created by special decree by the then head of state,

    General Uakubu Gowon. In a broadcast at 9:00 p.m. of

    May 27, 1969, General Uakubu Gowon announced a decree

  • dividing Nigeria into twelve states as a basis for stabil-

    ity (25, p. 47). On February 3, 1976, when seven new

    states were created in the Federal Republic of Nigeria by

    the then Federal Military Government, the former name—

    South Eastern State of Nigeria was changed to the present

    name—Cross River State of Nigeria (24, p. 131). The then

    Military Government announced that states would no longer

    be identified simply by their geographical locations but

    would all be given names, to "erase memories of the past

    politicalties and emotional attachments" (25, p. 131).

    Cross River State of Nigeria lies within the Cross

    River Basin between Latitude 4°25' and 7° North and longi-

    tudes 7°151 and 9°20; East. The state has an area of

    28,685 square kilometres, is bordered on the North by the

    Benue state, stretches into the Atlantic Ocean in the

    South, shares common boundaries with the Cameroun Republic

    in the East and the Imo and Rivers states in the West

    (22, p. 561). The population estimate of Cross River

    State is four million and the capital is Calabar (23,

    p. 251).

    Three major ethnic groups are easily identifiable in

    Cross River State of Nigeria. These are the EfiM/

    Ibibio/Annang group located in the South. The origins of

    the Ibibio are shrouded in mystery and obscured by con-

    flicting traditions. They are sometimes referred to as a

  • semi-Bantu group, indicating their linguistic affinity with

    the Bantu Congeries of languages in Central, Eastern and

    Southern Africa (12, p. 25). It is most probable that

    they migrated to their present area from the Cameroun

    uplands to the east and from the Cross River estuary, moved

    upriver as well as westwards until checked by other tribes

    (12, p. 25). The Ibibio language includes many dialects,

    the principal ones being Ibibio proper (Uyo), Efik

    (Calabar), Annang, Enyong, Eket-Ibibio and Andoni or

    Ibeno (12, p. 26). A curious and persistent belief among

    many Ibibio people is that they are related in some way to

    the Jews of Europe and Asia. Instances are cited of

    similarities between Ibibio and Hebrew in sentence struc-

    ture, idioms, proverbs and word usage. Common social

    customs, such as certain forms of purification, have also

    been noted (12, p. 26). The Ejagham group is spread over

    the North but divided into two sectors by an intermediary

    group—the Ekoi. The Southern sector of Ejagham comprises

    the Quas in Calabar Division and the neighboring people

    of Akamkpa Division while the Northern sector is made up

    of Etung—spreading people of Ikom, Akajuk, Nkum, Nkim,

    Mbube, and parts of Ogoja. In the Ekoi group are the

    people of Biase, Bahumono, Yakurr, Agbo, and Mbembe Clans

    (22, p. 561).

  • Education in Nigeria is no longer a private enterprise,

    but a huge government venture. It has witnessed a pro-

    gressive evolution of governmental intervention and

    participation. The federal military government favored

    university expansion to remove geographical educational

    imbalances, to foster national unity and to train high-level

    manpower. The National Policy on Education describes the

    way the Federal Government plans to achieve part of its

    national objectives using education as a tool, and the

    policy states that education is adopted as "an instrument

    par excellence for effecting national development" (11,

    p. 245).

    The policy states that Nigeria's philosophy of educa-

    tion is based on the development of the individual into

    a sound and effective citizen and that equal educational

    opportunities for all citizens of the nation at the

    primary, secondary, and tertiary levels, both inside and

    outside the formal school system should be provided (11,

    p. 245).

    There is an assumption that a relationship exists

    between planning and change. This assumption is under-

    scored by Morphet's statement that

    Change can occur without planning, and planning can be accomplished and have no tangible results. But as educational leaders attempt to develop more effective plans that are designed to bring about needed changes in educational environment, they will

  • need, to a greater degree than before, to understand the intimate and interdependent relationships that exist between planning and change, and to find ways of capitalizing upon the inherent strengths of these relationships (20, p. 91).

    Nigeria, like most other developing nations, is

    attempting to change at a speed greatly exceeding that

    attained by most developed nations. While political,

    economic, social, and technological changes took place

    gradually and sometimes by change in the older nations,

    the emerging nations are resorting more and more to

    systematic planning to effect change, and are placing

    considerable demands on the educational system to produce the

    manpower needed for national development (15, p. 9). This

    is not to say that the most astute planning will solve all

    educational problems, but that lack of planning or ineffec-

    tive planning would be a waste of resources. It cannot be

    assumed that education alone will bring about needed pro-

    gress and development, but undoubtedly education does

    improve the quality of life. Developing nations then can

    no longer afford to leave the education of their youth to

    chance.

    To underscore Nigeria's reliance on education as an

    instrument of change, the former Federal Commissioner for

    Education, Col. A. A. Ali, declared during the inaugural

    ceremony of the implementation Committee on National

    policy of Education in Lagos that

  • The new national policy on education was aimed at making education an instrument of socio-political as well as economic change, with far-reaching con-sequences for individuals and the society. . . . The essential character of education should be seen in its capacity to meet declared national objectives, including the inculcation of national conscious-ness, unity and the right values and attitudes (27, p. 2181).

    African leaders have witnessed the powerful influence

    that education has on underdeveloped countries such as

    their own, and they regard education as a powerful change

    agent. Education, they felt, was the magical "something"

    necessary to produce citizens of appropriate quantity,

    skills, and attitudes. A Nigerian leader once said,

    "In the New Africa education must be accorded priority

    number one; it is the 'open Sesame' to all problems" (4).

    Vaizey, although he was referring to Western coun-

    tries, remarks that "even in absolute terms, education is

    a big industry; but in terms of its demand for highly

    trained people it is the largest single occupation" (4).

    Education has become a major, if not the major,

    concern of the new independent states of Africa. At

    almost every point in the modernization process, education

    is the critical factor, for without it, Africa's people

    would be unable to enter the modern technological world.

    For millions of Africans, education is the key that will

    open the door to a better life and higher living standards,

  • 10

    The control and planning of education has become an area

    of crucial magnitude (8, p. 3).

    The importance of education cannot be over-emphasized.

    In 1978 the General Conference of UNESCO said, "By the very

    complexity of the problems which it must help to solve,

    education must be conceived in an interdisciplinary context

    as a factor of multidimensional development of which man

    is both the end and the instrument" (24, p. 1819). In the

    "Special Report on Education," (24, p. 1819) the World

    Bank clearly delineates the significance of education.

    First, education is a basic human need. "People need

    education to acquire a broad base of knowledge, attitude,

    values and skills on which they can build a better life"

    (24, p. 1819). Thus,education enhances people's ability

    to learn, adapt to social and cultural activities (24,

    p. 1819) .

    Second, education is a means of meeting other basic

    needs:

    Education influences and is in turn influenced by access to other basic needs—adequate nutrition, safe drinking water, health services, and shelter. In this context, one remembers the argument of experts that health programmes could be accelerated more by teaching the people basic principles of hygiene than by sophisticated medical science. Also, if children are better fed they can learn better, which would improve their overall benefits from education (24, p. 1819).

  • 11

    Third, all development programmes depend on education

    for the simple reason that they all require skilled workers

    at all levels to manage capital, technology, services, and

    administration in every sector (24, p. 1819).

    In this "special report on education," (24, p. 1819)

    the World bank laid emphasis on the fact that despite

    significant improvement in the enrollment of children in

    all spheres of education, the developing countries still

    have a long way to go in solving the problems of education.

    Nigeria, with its introduction of Universal Primary

    Education (UPE) in 1979 did initiate momentous thrust

    in eradicating illiteracy. The effort has transformed

    the country into a demanding and changing society. There

    are numerous basic issues that revolve around this trans-

    formation. It may be interesting to determine the extent

    to which the present administrative machinery is sufficient

    and capable of coping with the problems of educational

    change.

    It was the ingenuity of the military government in

    Nigeria that ushered in a free primary education as a

    weapon against illiteracy, and also brought about a new

    educational policy to guide the future of the people in

    attaining the goals of education. Thus, the planned

    changes in education had the interest and the backing of

    those at the top of the political ladder. This affirmed

  • 12

    the contention of Schramm of the importance of the involvment

    of political leadership where changes and innovation are

    planned (13, p. 165).

    An addquate secondary school system in Nigeria is a

    major problem, but it is not a top priority item. Top

    priority has more frequently been given to expanding

    elementary education and to establishing universities

    (9, p. 298) .

    Nigerian education is in a period of transition. The

    contemporary form of education in the new nation reflects

    the British concepts on which the system was developed

    prior to political independence. Education is now being

    "Americanized," although the nation is still experimenting

    with ideas borrowed from many different countries of the

    world (9, p. 298).

    Secondary education in Cross River State of Nigeria

    consists of five years (called "forms") at the end of

    which students take the west African school certificate

    examination. After completing this examination, students

    who wish to attend universities usually must take an

    additional two years' work ("sixth form") and pass the

    Advanced Level Certificate Examination (9, p. 298). It

    is assumed by Nigerian educators that this middle step

    between the secondary school and the university is no

  • 13

    longer necessary, and it is being phased out. Further

    research will help to validate its assumption. Secondary-

    education in the Cross River State of Nigeria is neither

    free nor compulsory (9, p. 298).

    It is hoped that a historical review of secondary

    education in the Cross River State of Nigeria will bring

    to light some of the old and new problems, and thus some

    major suggestions and recommendations may be made which

    could contribute to the solution of the problems.

    Statement of the Problem

    The problem of this study is to complete a historical

    review of the educational system of the Cross River State of

    Nigeria with special emphasis on secondary education.

    Purposes of the Study

    The purposes of the study are

    1. To describe the past and present system of

    secondary education in the Cross River State of Nigeria;

    2. To describe the curriculum design and instruc-

    tional activities of secondary schools in the Cross River

    State of Nigeria;

    3. To describe the qualifications of secondary school

    teachers in the Cross River State of Nigeria;

    4. To examine the goals, achievements, failures and

    problems of secondary shcools in the Cross River State

  • 14

    of Nigeria with special consideration for the period from

    1970 to 1981?

    5. To draw conclusions and make recommendations for

    improvement of the secondary educational system in the

    Cross River State of Nigeria.

    Research Questions

    Specifically, this study will explore the following

    questions.

    1. What were the purposes of traditional education

    in the Cross River State of Nigeria before the introduc-

    tion of western education?

    2. What are the current purposes of secondary

    education in the Cross River State of Nigeria?

    3. What is the nature of secondary curriculum and

    co-curriculum activities in the Cross River State of

    Niger ia?

    4. Who attends secondary schools in the Cross River

    State of Nigeria?

    5. What are the qualifications of secondary school

    teachers in the Cross River State of Nigeria?

    6. How is secondary education financed in the

    Cross River State of Nigeria?

    7. Which individuals or groups influence the initia-

    tion of educational policies in the Cross River State of

    Nigeria and to what degree?

  • 15

    8. What is the influence of selected individuals or

    groups on the development of educational policies in the

    Cross River State of Nigeria after policies have been

    proposed?

    9. What is the influence of selected individuals or

    groups on the final approval of educational policies in

    the Cross River State of Nigeria?

    10. What future plans are under way in the Cross

    River State of Nigeria for expansion, growth, and improve-

    ment in the secondary education programme?

    11. As a result of this study, what recommendations

    might contribute to the improvement of secondary educa-

    tion programmes in the Cross River State of Nigeria?

    Definition of Terms

    Terms used in this study are defined as follows.

    Secondary grammar school.—This secondary school is

    designed for children thirteen through seventeen years of

    age who are college-bound. The programme takes five years

    to complete with a strong academic bias, in the English

    tradition, leading to the West African School Certificate

    Examination (19, p. 158).

    Secondary commercial school.—A secondary school

    designed for children thirteen through seventeen years of

    age who are career-bound. It is characterized by

  • 16

    instruction in commercial vocational subjects. It is

    therefore a kind of vocational school from which graduates

    go immediately to work (19, p. 158).

    Secondary technical school.—A secondary school

    designed for children thirteen through seventeen years of

    age who are career-bound. It is a kind of vocational

    school where graduates go immediately to work as techni-

    cians in government departments.

    Comprehensive secondary school.--A secondary school

    designed for children thirteen through seventeen years of

    age. The school has each of the programmes that are

    offered in secondary grammar schools, secondary commercial

    and secondary technical schools.

    Chairman.—This is the chief administrative officer

    of the state school board that oversees the welfare of

    secondary schools and teacher training colleges in the

    Cross River State of Nigeria. By the American pattern, he

    is the state superintendent of schools.

    State School Board.—This is the board appointed by

    the Cross River State of Nigeria Ministry of Education

    that employs and assigns teachers at the post-primary

    school level. This is similar to the state school board

    of an American school system.

  • 17

    Educated Nigerians.—The term is interpreted to

    include all Nigerians who complete either the first six

    years of training in primary schools and obtain Nigerian

    First School Leaving Certificate at the end of the six

    years; those Nigerians, who, after obtaining their First

    School Leaving Certificate further their education for

    five years in secondary schools and obtain the West

    African School Certificate after a successful completion

    of their programmes; and Nigerians who have University

    education and obtain either a bachelor^, master^, or

    doctoral, degree (7, p. 41).

    Local government area•—This is a geographically

    delineated unit divided into subdivisions for administra-

    tive convenience. A comparable term in the United States

    of America is the county (2, p. 10).

    National certificate of education.—A post-secondary

    professional teaching diploma awarded after three years of

    satisfactory work.

    General certificate of education.—This is a certifi-

    cation of academic achievement administered by the West

    African examination council offered in two tiers:

    "ordinary" and "advanced" levels--grade 12 and junior

    college graduate equivalents in the United State of

    America respectively (2, p. 10).

  • 18

    Delimitations of the Study

    The present study was limited to Cross River State

    of Nigeria because generalizations to all nineteen states

    in Nigeria would be meaningless, as the system of secondary

    education in each of the nineteen states is unique.

    The study was also limited to the materials available

    through the United States Library of Congress in Washing-

    ton, D.C., U.S.A., the British Library, London, of which

    the British Museum is a part, the leading United States

    universities connected with the development of education in

    Nigeria, the Ministry of Education of Cross River State of

    Nigeria, and the Nigerian universities. The study was also

    limited to the materials available through government

    publications, educational laws and decrees, unpublished

    theses and dissertations, articles in the professional

    journals, reports of UNESCO, Nigerian educational research

    institutes, the Nigerian Chronicle (the Cross River State

    of Nigeria Daily Newspaper), and the Nigerian Daily Times

    (Nigerian Daily Newspaper). The study was also limited

    to the materials available through the World Bank study

    of Nigerian Education, and interviews.

    Cross River State of Nigeria was selected for this

    study because it exhibits many of the characteristics of

    the educational systems in those nations classified by

    economists as "developing nations." Also it faces

  • 19

    problems in human resource development similar to those

    that other developing nations face.

    Background and Significance of the Study

    This study is concerned with a concise but broad

    historical review of secondary education in Cross River

    State of Nigeria. The relevant literature is replete

    with references to the Nigerian system of education and

    the problems facing the system. An analysis of the

    historical evaluation of the federation reveals the

    forces underlying Nigeria's problems to include the

    following: sociocultural and religious diversity, the

    piecemeal acquisition and administration of different

    areas of the country, and certain aspects of public

    policy in the colonial period (3, p. 9).

    Nigeria is characterized by social, cultural,

    linguistic, and religious diversity. The piecemeal

    acquisition of the country by the British and the system

    of indirect administration served to maintain the

    identity of each of the regions, so that local centre of

    leadership and loyalty solidified before political

    independence. Certain aspects of public policy, for

    example, the policy of restricting Christian missionary

    activity in the north while giving free access to mission-

    ary initiative in the south, contributed to uneven social

    and educational development between the north and south

  • 20

    and resulted in interregional tensions (14, pp. 238-239).

    The effect of the British influence on the education of

    Nigerians has been a subject of much discussion (1). A

    need arose for studies in this area so that educationists

    would be aware of the particular characteristics associated

    with the development of education in Cross River State of

    Nigeria. Such studies would aid educationists in their

    endeavour to lead the young nation at the local, state

    and federal levels, to examine the purposes, goals, and

    limitations of secondary school set-up in Cross River

    State of Nigeria and thus reveal the weaknesses and

    problems of the system, and to make available any sugges-

    tions concerning the improvement of the secondary educa-

    tion system in Cross River State of Nigeria.

    Research Design

    This study was designed to review the history of

    secondary education in Cross River State of Nigeria.

    Thus, it was a descriptive research.

    Data were collected, evidence was synthesized in

    order to establish the facts pertaining to the study, and

    conclusions were drawn concerning the past and present.

    Finally suggestions were made regarding the secondary

    education system in Cross River State of Nigeria.

  • 21

    Summary

    The preceding paragraphs provided the following: a

    brief political history of Nigeria and that of Cross River

    State of Nigeria, a statement of the problem, the purposes

    of the study, questions to be investigated, the definition

    of major terms, limitations of the study, a brief back-

    ground and significance of the study and the research

    design.

    The next chapter contains the development of major

    concepts and a review of related literature. Chapter

    Three deals in detail with traditional education in Cross

    River State of Nigeria. Chapter Four is a description of

    the primary and secondary education systems in Cross River

    State of Nigeria from 1970 to 1981. Chapter Five contains

    the findings, conclusions and recommendations. A general

    bibliography is appended.

  • CHAPTER BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Adeyinka, A. A., "Impact of Secondary School Education in the Western State of Nigeria," Comparative Education, 9 (October, 1973), 151-155.

    2. Ahuwan, Abasiya Magaji, "Needs Assessment: An Analysis of Institutional Goals in Post-primary Schools in Nigeria with Special Reference to Kaduna State," unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1981.

    3. Ajala, Oyewole Olayioye, "A Historical Review of Secondary Education in Western Nigeria: 1842-1976," unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1977.

    4. Biobaku, S. 0., "Africa's Needs and Africa's Universi-ties," West African Journal of Education, Vol. viii, No. 2.

    5. Coombs, Philip H., What is Educational Planning? UNESCO, International Institute of Educational Planning, 1970.

    6. Crowder, Michael, A Short History of Nigeria, New York, Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., Publishers, 1966.

    7. Ekpenyong, Jackson J., "Development of Educational Institution and Social Change in Nigeria: 1953 1973," unpublished master's thesis, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1976.

    8. Ekpo, Koko Okon Akpan, "Qualifications of Secondary School Teachers in English-speaking Africa—An Overview," unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carolina Christian University, Chester, Virginia, 1980.

    9. Encyclopedia Americana, 1970, Vol. 1, pp. 298-299.

    10. Fafunwa, Alliu Babatunde, "An Historical Analysis of the Development of Higher Education in Nigeria," doctoral dissertation, New York Univeristy, 1955.

    22

  • 23

    11. Federal Military Government of Nigeria, Supplement of Official Gazette of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 61, No. 4 (January 24, 1974—Part A), by Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, Nigeria.

    12. Floyd, Barry, Eastern Nigeria: A Geographical Review, London, Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 196 9.

    13. Havelock, R. G. and Huberman, A. M., Solving Educa-tional Problems; The Theory and Reality of Innovation in Developing Countries, UNESCO, Switzerland, 1972.

    14. Ibim, Geoffrey Mark, "Federal Government and the Development of Education in Nigeria: 1951-1965," University of California, Los Angeles, 1968.

    15. Ibiok, Joseph F. D., "The Development of a Model Plan for Evaluating Higher Education Planning in Nigeria," unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 1980.

    16. Ighoavodha, Frederick J. 0., "Keynote Address Pre-sented to the Nigerian Students Union, Denton Chapter, Denton, Texas, during the Nigerian Independence Anniversary celebration, October 4, 1980.

    17. Kirk-Greene, A. H. M., "Who Coined the Name Nigeria?" West Africa, December 22, 1956.

    18. Knezevich, Stephen J., Administration of Public Education, New York, Harper and Row, Publishers, 1969.

    19. Lewis, L. J., Society Schools and Progress in Nigeria, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1965.

    20. Morphet, E. L., Jesser, D. L., and Ludka, A. P., Planning and Providing for Excellence in Educa-tion, New York, Citation Press, 1972.

    21. Nigeria Diary, Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, Nigeria, 1973.

    22. Nigeria Year Book, A "Daily Times" of Nigeria publica-tion, 1979.

  • 24

    23. Nigeria Year Book, A "Daily Times" of Nigeria publica-tion, 1980.

    24. Obe, Ad'obe, "Special Report on Education," West Africa, West Africa Publishing Company Ltd., London, (September 22, 1980), 1819.

    25. Ojiako, James 0., Thirteen Years of Military Rule, A "Daily Times" of Nigeria Publication, Lagos, Nigeria, 1979.

    26. Paxton, John, Editor, The Stateman's Yearbook: Statistical and Historical Annual of the States of the World for the Year 1875-1976, New York, St. Martini's Press, 1975, pp. 459-460.

    27. West Africa Magazine, West Africa Publishing Company, Ltd., London, (October 24, 1977), 2181.

    28. West Africa Magazine, September 29, 1980, p. 1895.

  • CHAPTER II

    REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

    Introduction

    The Cross River State of Nigeria is one of the educa-

    cationally backward states in Nigeria. This fact has

    been accepted by successive administrations of the state

    since its inception. At the commencement of the third

    state development plan (1975-1980), the State's education

    under development was still clearly manifest in acute

    shortage of high-level and skilled man-power, particularly

    in the administrative, professional and technical cadres,

    as well as in low enrollment ratio, particularly at the

    secondary and tertiary levels of education (6, p. 48).

    This situation would appear to have arisen and persisted

    principally as a result of past neglect of the geographi-

    cal area now known as the Cross River State of Nigeria in

    the provision of educational facilities and economic

    infrastructures for the economic well-being of its

    inhabitants (6, p. 48).

    The history of Nigeria necessitates a need for

    assessing its educational goals. Ogunsola (36, pp. 105-

    127) has synthesized and revealed four distinct eras

    in the development of education in Nigeria from its

    25

  • 26

    inception: 1890 to 1925—The Period of Experimentation,

    1925 to 1948--The Period of Attempted Reorganization,

    1948 to 1966 The Period of Consolidation and Independence,

    and 1966 to present—The Period of Evolution of National

    Policy on Education. Okafor (37, pp. 1-5) further

    explained that these periods each had its organizational,

    racial or other imperatives which determined the specific

    objectives it pursued.

    The dilemma that faces educational planners in

    Nigeria has been articulated by Ndamukong (27, pp. 8-12),

    where he stated, "We have reached a point where many roads

    converge and it is vitally important for the future of our

    educational system that we choose the correct road forward."

    Other contributions about the educational problems were

    cited by George (17, pp. 54-56), stating that the problem

    over current trends in education was due to ineffective

    planning and coordination. He emphasized that education

    should endow pupils with the capacity to contribute

    effectively as citizens and workers in social development.

    Purpose and Value of Educational Planning

    Ibiok (19, p. 15), writing in 1980, stated that

    before 1950 the term "educational planning" was scarcely

    used, but that in the last twenty-five years the popularity

    of that term has soared. He further stated that people

    who are concerned with the future of education all over

  • 27

    the world are showing such renewed interest and concern

    for the orderly development of educational systems that a

    large body of professional literature has developed and is

    roughly doubling each year. He emphasized that educational

    planning, as it is known today, is not only growing rapidly

    but its discussions are being extended to cover a wider

    range of topics, and questions, such as economic develop-

    ment, manpower, curriculum, teaching techniques, finance,

    and fiscal policy. For our purposes, the function of

    educational planning may be defined as a process of study

    and foresight which generates action to achieve desired

    educational outcomes (19, p. 16).

    Coombs warns that whatever educational planning is,

    it is certainly not a miracle drug for aiding educational

    systems nor, conversely, is it a devil's potion that breeds

    only evil (8, p. 14). What seems to give educational

    planning such popularity among political leaders, legis-

    lators, administrators, teachers, students, and assorted

    citizens according to Ibiok (19, p. 16) is the common

    recognition of educational planning as a key tool of

    economic and social development.

    Poignant argues that education should have a

    privileged position in the national plan because it trains

    future workers and aims at raising production and the

    standard of living, thereby improving every aspect of

  • 28

    human society (40, p. 47). He says that education is a

    long-term national investment and that the future active

    population of a country will derive the benefit of an

    expanding flow of better-educated and trained young

    people. This, he says will gradually transform the

    intellectual and vocational structure of the population.

    The higher skills of the active population will make

    it possible for production techniques to be constantly

    improved and for the steady progress of economic expansion.

    He concludes that "the advantages of this type of invest-

    ment are not restricted to the sort economists try to

    calculate, but are felt in all spheres, whether social,

    domestic, cultural or democratic" (40, p. 47).

    Several other authors arguing in the same vein, trace

    the relationship of education and educational planning to

    economic development. Fernandez (15) says that educa-

    tional planning has a special place in national develop-

    ment. After reviewing the planning activities in Latin

    America and elsewhere, he makes a rather strong ideologi-

    cal justification of educational planning as a tool of

    development.

    McCusken (25) made a study of the educational system

    of the Republic of China in 1962 and found that it played

    a significant role in the economic development of the

    Republic. Rodriguez (41) studied the long-term needs

  • 29

    for economic development of Puerto Rico and concluded that

    the system must be expanded to meet the commonwealth's

    trained manpower requirements and recommended the

    establishment of an educational planning body. Vaizey

    (47) in consideration of education as an economic

    phenomenon supports the manpower approach to educational

    planning. He sees a direct relationship between educa-

    tion and economic development. Dennison (11), attempted

    to measure the contribution of education to economic growth

    with particular reference to the United States. The

    Japanese Ministry of Education acknowledges the "quanti-

    tative and qualitative" contributions of education to the

    economic growth of Japan, relating this contribution to

    the increase in public expenditure in education (21).

    As Ibiok points out, the common notion among authors

    seems to be that nations should increase the proportion of

    their resources devoted to education because of the rela-

    tionship of education to national development and economic

    growth (19, p. 18). He further states that educational

    systems all over the world seem to be in the "man—power

    business" because they are called upon to meet the ever

    expanding and increasingly sophisticated human resource

    requirements of national economies. It should however

    be pointed out that no studies have yet revealed a clear-

    cut casual relationship between the volume of investment

  • 30

    in education and successful national development (19,

    p. 19). As Harbison points out, education of the wrong

    kind may even impede growth (18, p. 33). Thus, the single

    most important reason suggested in the literature for

    educational planning for both industrialized and under-

    developed nations is for efficient allocation of resources

    to produce the needed manpower to help keep the economy

    going.

    No longer is education viewed as a non-productive

    sector of the economy which absorbs "consumption expendi-

    ture" but it is now viewed as an essential "investment

    expenditure" for economic growth. Coombs observes,

    Wearing this impressive new investment label, educa-tion is able to make a more effective claim on national budgets. But to justify the claim, educa-tors themselves would have to become more manpower-minded. They would have to plan and try to govern their student intakes and outputs to fit the pattern of manpower requirements certified by the economists to be necessary for the economy's good health (8, p. 22) .

    The literature, though thin on the relationship of

    education and educational planning to social development,

    as distinct from economic development, does have some

    arguments in favour of educational planning for non-

    economic reasons. According to Ibiok, man is a social

    animal, but he is tending more and more to be an economic

    robot, and therefore education unquestionably must

  • 31

    contribute to the vital non-economic dimensions and forces

    of national development (19, p. 20).

    Authors with a background in education and sociology,

    nurtured on the liberal, humanistic tradition, prefer

    to argue that without planning, the educational systems

    continue to leave large reserves of ability in the popu-

    lation educationally underdeveloped. They prefer to

    fight for bigger budgets and more investment in education

    on higher ground, arguing that education is the right of

    every person who can benefit from it (19, p. 20). In other

    words, the moral conception of education in the twentieth

    century is the principle of formal equality of educational

    opportunity.

    The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and

    Development) has sponsored several studies on the social

    objectives in educational planning. Anderson (28, p. 31),

    Vaizey (47), Weinberg (48), and Hayward (28, p. 202) deal

    with the concept of education as a tool of social develop-

    ment and have carried out several studies to support equal

    educational privilege and opportunity. They see a need

    for expansion of educational opportunity and observe that

    "educational expansion has not led automatically to more

    equal participation as between the social strata" (38,

    p. 26) .

  • 32

    Ibiok (19, p. 21) points out that the nature of a modern

    industrial society requires that citizens undergo an

    education which is essentially intellectual in content

    in order that they may become useful citizens. Thompson

    and Fogel (44, p. 16) state that universities cannot

    determine social mobility as such; but they can contribute

    to it, and that in dealing with education we are dealing

    with "values."

    Curie (10) and Bernier and Williams (3) make the

    same non-material argument for educational planning, with

    Bernier stating that education then, beyond all other

    devices of human origin, is the great equalizer of the

    conditions of men the balance-wheel of the social

    machinery . . . it gives each man the independence and the

    means by which he can resist the selfishness of other men.

    It does better than to disarm the poor of their hostility

    towards the rich: it prevents being poor. . . . Moral

    education is a primal necessity of social existence

    (3, p. 274) .

    The thinking among supporters of the social objectives

    of education then is that if education helps the economy's

    slave (19, p. 21), educational planning should aim at

    developing the recipients first and foremost as individuals

    and not as a manpower statistic (19, p. 21).

  • 33

    According to Ibiok (19, p. 21), both the economic

    development and the social development proponents agree

    that in order to cope with the concrete and enormous tasks

    that face educational systems all over the world, we must

    approach them "planfully." He further points out that

    sociologists and others concerned with social development,

    have some very convincing arguments, but they still have

    some distance to cover in translating social and human

    development objectives into sufficiently specific terms

    to be operationally useful for educational planning and

    programming.

    Ibiok (19, p. 22) then concludes by stating that

    systematic educational planning is necessary for the

    following reasons:

    1. To cope with the increase in student numbers

    provoked by demographic expansions,

    2. The almost universal acceptance of the principle

    of equality of educational opportunity for all,

    3. The need for skilled manpower for economic growth,

    4. The need to minimize wasteful imbalance within

    the educational systems and to allocate and utilize

    available resources efficiently and effectively,

    5. To alleviate many non-financial bottlenecks like

    shortage of staff, faculty, and physical facilities,

  • 34

    6. Long-range planning provides a commonality of

    understanding about the mission and goals of the system

    (and institutions) and the strategies to implement them,

    7. Planning helps direct energies away from the non-

    essentials to the essential activities,

    8. It makes evaluation possible in objective terms

    simultaneously with implementation,

    9. Planning assists in generating funds by strength-

    ening the institutional and systemwide case with the

    granting agencies, governmental and private,

    10. It helps to ensure the survival and growth of

    the system and component institutions.

    Traditional Education in Nigeria

    According to Fafunwa (14, p. 17), traditional educa-

    tion in Nigeria differed from place to place chiefly

    because of social, economic, and geographical imperatives.

    Ajala (2, p. 15) points out that the education of the

    child in Nigerian society began in infancy, just as was

    true in European, Asiatic, or American society. The

    history of Nigerian education is a reflection of the

    country's richness in culture and tradition. Research

    indicates that some sorts of systems of education had been

    in existence in Nigeria as early as 1472 before the arrival

    of European influence on the Coast of Africa south of the

    Sahara. This was not only an important source of

  • 35

    inspiration to the people but a remarkable portal for the

    Europeans to channel their ideas and new philosophies.

    Since the people had already embraced some forms of

    education, what came with the Europeans was the continua-

    tion and extension of what had been known and accepted.

    Through time many of the attributes of the early education

    had been modified, altered, and changed, yet, the present

    system of education in Nigeria has never been completely

    divested of those natural elements which were responsible

    in alerting the people to act in consort in the past in

    response to a given situation. Even with the change in

    educational orientations in this era, culture still

    exercises no less influence in the social and economic

    spheres in the country. The Nigerian value system today

    is nothing more than the redefinition and the extension

    of what existed before based on the context of today's

    societal demands. The parents were responsible for the

    early childhood education of their children (14, p. 18).

    Fafunwa identified what he called the Seven Cardinal Goals

    of traditional education and stated that traditional

    education was made up of the following features: Physical

    training, development of character, respect for elders and

    peers, intellectual training, the poetic and the Prophe-

    tic apsects, vocational training, community participation,

    and cultural heritage (14, pp. 20-49). Fafunwa concluded

  • 36

    by stating that traditional education, in spite of criti-

    cisms by European and American writers, was not any more

    conservative or any less progressive than any other

    system (14, p. 48). He added that there was much that the

    Nigerian educational system as it existed in 1974, could

    learn from the traditional educational system (14, p. 49).

    Njoku (33) points out that the first school a child

    attended was the home, and early childhood education was

    entirely in the hands of the mother. She further states

    that precolonial Nigerian society stressed educating for

    practical needs of life and for full participation in

    all the tribal activities—political, social, economic,

    and religious. Parents, relatives, elders, and peer

    groups were in essence teachers according to her (33).

    Each person knew the customs and traditions of the tribe

    and generously cooperated in the education of the children

    (2). Research indicates that what the child was taught

    was meaningful to him. It prepared him for active

    participation in all the activities of the community.

    All of his education related directly to his environment

    (33, pp. 11-37) .

    Research indicates that prior to the arrival of

    Europeans in Nigeria, the young were trained to uphold

    customs and tradition, to respect natural laws, and in the

    art of trade. The mission of education in existence was

  • 37

    to produce good community leaders knowledgeable in civic

    responsibilities. Thus the important challenge to the

    educational system was the promotion of social loyalties

    and of preserving the ideals of institutions of faith

    of the time. The functions of education at that time,

    was simply that of sophisticating the young minds in the

    morals and in the ethical conducts of the time. There-

    fore, all efforts of the educational endeavour were to

    promote status quo.

    However, from this simple beginning the greater

    things grew. The formal educational system which came

    to Nigeria with the coming of European missionaries

    became established. The great test of it all was the

    acceptance of the change in orientations with little or

    no resistance. This situation came about because the

    nature of change that came was incremental according to

    research. Research further indicates that what was in

    existence was never thrown away as unfit to make way for

    the new start. Rather what existed before was accepted

    and blended into the new system through gradual modi-

    fication.

    Educational Developments During the British Rule

    It was trade in slaves that brought North Africa,

    Northern Nigeria and Southern Nigeria together with the

  • 38

    Europeans in early part of sixteenth century. The rapidly

    increasing demand for slaves as West Indian and tropical

    American plantations production began to boom, encouraged

    the Europeans to have a close contact with Nigeria, where

    they found a large number of slaves they needed (13, p. 6).

    Ekpenyong (13, p. 6) points out that, in the 1620s, the

    number of African slaves reaching the Americas was about

    7,000 to 8,000 a year. In the last quarter of the seven-

    teenth century the average American import of slaves was

    25,000, and the total number of slaves imported during

    that century was estimated at about 1,300,000. In the

    1780s, 70,000 slaves were being landed in the Americas

    each year (49, p. 768). The volume of slave trade in

    West Africa grew rapidly from its inception around 1500

    to its peak in the eighteenth century. About 6.3 million

    slaves were shipped from West African slave ports and more

    than 4.5 million slaves from 1701 to 1810 (28, p. 48).

    Ekpenyong (13, p. 7) writing in 1976 pointed out

    that missionaries began to go to Nigeria in order to

    educate and Christianize the people and to help check the

    adverse effects of the slave trade. He went on to say

    that when the slave trade was legally stopped by the

    British government in 1807, both the missionaries and the

    British government worked hand in hand in establishing

    schools and legitimate trade in Nigeria. According to

  • 39

    Ekpenyong (13, p. 7), the legitimate trade (or non-slave

    trade) included such commodities as palm oil, palm kernels

    and ivory, which the Europeans exchanged for guns, gin and

    rum.

    Ekpenyong (13, p. 8) points out that the efforts

    of the Christian missionaires were more intensive than

    those of the non—slave traders. Through their extensive

    evangelical activities, the missionaries played a very

    critical role in the field of education in Nigeria.

    Unlike the legitimate traders, they did not limit their

    endeavours to port towns, rail or river lines or commercial

    centres; they penetrated into the most remote areas in

    the interior with the determination to remain there until

    Christianity was firmly established (13, p. 8).

    In the mid-1940s, the Wesleyan Methodist missionaries

    and the Church Missionary Society began work in Southern

    Nigeria. During the next half—century, these pioneer

    missionaries were followed by the Church of Scotland,

    Baptist, Presbyterian, Episcopalians and the Roman Catho-

    lics in 1900. Research indicates that, by the end of

    World War I, fifteen European missionaries and American

    evangelical groups were operating in the southern pro-

    vinces and the middle belt of Nigeria. Coleman noted

    that, more than 600 European missionaries assisted by

    nearly 5,000 Nigerians, had established close to 3,000

  • 40

    churches, and Christendom claimed more than 800,000

    communicants by the end of World War I (7, p.. 94). Coleman

    points out that the impact of missionaries was first felt

    by the Yoruba, Ibo and the Ibibio-Efik (now in Cross River

    State of Nigeria) ethnic groups (7, p. 94). According to

    him, although the Ibo and Ibibio-Efik groups had very

    few converts between 1880 and 1885, the number of converts

    grew rapidly from 514,395 in 1920 to 3,915,500 in 1953, and

    50 percent of their population was Christianized. Because

    of the impact of Islam among the Muslim North group, there

    were no Christian missionaries in that region.

    The Yorubas had been exposed to Western education

    at a much earlier date than any other group in Nigeria.

    They were the first ethnic group in Nigeria that had many

    religious stations and Christians as early as 1875 (42,

    p. 66) .

    The Ibibio-Efik groups in the Cross River State of

    Nigeria are the next ethnic groups that felt the impact

    of missionaries during the later part of the nineteenth

    century (13, p. 11). The basic social unit among the

    Ibibio-Efik has been a single extended family or a

    kindred composed of several families.

    The British government in Lagos Colony first concerned

    itself with education in 1877, when it approved an annual

    grant to support mission schools. In 1886, the

  • 41

    administration of Lagos Colony passed an education

    ordinance that granted the government of the Colony some

    control over mission schools (28, p. 177). After a decade,

    (1906) about 126 primary schools with an enrollment of

    about 11,872 pupils and one secondary school (King's

    College in Lagos) with about 20 pupils had been established

    in Southern Nigeria (32, p. 169).

    Crowder contends that the missionaries, by educating

    the Nigerians, played a very powerful role in changing

    their social and traditional status (9, p. 132). According

    to Crowder, before the end of the nineteenth century,

    education in Nigeria had been conducted in various parts

    of the nation.

    Coleman (7, p. 107), writing in 1958, pointed out

    that in most cases, education in Nigeria was based on

    reading, writing and calculating in the English language.

    He further stated that, the curriculum later included

    British Empire history, European geography and some

    practical courses in gardening, sanitation, and personal

    hygiene. It is regretable that African history was con-

    sidered either non-existent or unimportant by those well-

    meaning teachers, who emphasized European wars, Colonial

    campaigns of pacification, the evolution of the British

    Constitution, and the growth of the British Empire (7,

    p. 115). Most readings in English literature were taken

  • 42

    from Shakespeare and the Bible. Thus, it is quite common

    m Nigeria today to find semi-educated people, doing

    menial jobs, who can name the principal English cities,

    quote the Bible, and recite Hamlet, but who have little

    knowledge of the geography, proverbs, folk tales, or

    prominent leaders and historical events of their own

    country (7, p. 115).

    The importance of the missionary monopoly of educa-

    tion lies in the evangelical approach of mission schools.

    These schools, and perhaps mission hospitals and clinics,

    were powerful instruments for rapid Christianization (and

    hence Europeanization) of the Nigerians (7, p. 113).

    In Cross River State of Nigeria, there were very few

    schools during this period, most of which belonged to

    popular religious bodies like Catholics, Methodists,

    Presbyterians, Qua Iboe, the Salvation Army and a few

    others (6, p. 9). Buell (4, p. 728) contends that in

    Cross River State of Nigeria as elsewhere in British

    Africa, education was left mostly to the missionary

    organizations which established village schools, under

    village teachers, primarily with a view to training the

    natives in the principles of the Christian religion. He

    points out that at Calabar, the capital of Cross River

    State of Nigeria, the Scottish Mission maintained an

    industrial school of high order, the Hope-Waddell Training

  • 43

    Institution (4, p. 728). Writing about the Hope Waddell

    Training Institution, Oduah and Jennings (35, p. 135)

    point out that this institution is the oldest secondary

    school in Nigeria. Its former principal, Sir Francis

    Ibiam, became the Governor of Eastern Nigeria in 1960

    (35, p. 135).

    The government was willing to leave the bulk of

    primary education to the missionary bodies, which it

    assisted by grants-in-aid. Such schools were called

    "assisted" schools (4, p. 728). Buell (4, p. 728) points

    out that an education code prescr ibed the subjects to be

    taught by such schools. According to him, the determina-

    tion as to whether or not a school should be given a grant

    was based upon the report of a government inspector. In

    computing the standard of efficiency, the inspector was

    guided by the ratio of instructors to pupils, the manners

    and cleanliness of the pupils, the examination, and the

    adequacy of the school plant (4, p. 728). These inspectors

    were frequently criticized as being unfair. To any infant

    school satisfying the qualifications, a grant of six or

    eight, or twelve shillings for each unit of average

    attendance over the age of four years was paid; in the

    primary schools, the grants ranged from fifteen to thirty

    shillings; and in secondary schools, from thirty shillings

  • 44

    to three pounds. Likewise, the government made similar

    grants to the salaries of native teachers (24, p. 456)

    Nsima, in his article stated that the original

    philosophy of most schools in Cross River State of Nigeria

    was centred on character training and learning the three

    R s (Reading, Writing and Arithmetic). The students were

    tied down on the learning of subject matter. Group

    activities were regarded as a menace to religious prac-

    tices/ since most schools were church-related (34).

    Hollis A. Moore, Jr., writing in 1954, stated that

    only 10 percent of Nigerian children were attending any

    school. There was also the problem of getting girls into

    schools (26). The federal government of Nigeria began

    free primary education in Lagos in 1955. The government

    of the Eastern Region (of which Cross River State of

    Nigeria was a part) began a similar programme in 1957

    but had to reinstate the requirement for fees in 1958

    (28, p. 180).

    Despite the expansion of educational facilities, in

    1955, Nigeria was only educating 800 undergraduates and

    12,000 secondary school students a year, and most of

    these came from Southern Nigeria (to which Cross River

    State belongs). The need for more clerks, technicians,

    administrators and professionally qualified men like

    medical doctors and engineers, for employment both in

  • 45

    government service and in commerce, was a constant problem

    m the post-war years and severely hampered the execution

    of governmental development plans (31, p. 42). in its

    expansion of educational opportunities, the government

    was submitted to great pressure by the nationalists, who

    thought of education as a panacea for most of their

    country's ills. These nationalists, once they began

    to assume control of government policy, were determined

    to ensure that there would be places in schools for all

    Nigerian children (39).

    Educational Development After Political Independence

    On the achievement of political independence in

    1960, Nigeria was faced with the paradoxical situation

    that her rapid but uneven expansion of educational

    facilities had confronted her with two problems: on the

    one hand the governments had to decide what to do with

    the vast number of unemployed school-leavers, and on the

    other they had quickly to provide the higher level of

    manpower—administrators, professional personnel, techni-

    cians, teachers, officers in the police and army and the

    judicial services which had previously been supplied by

    the Colonial power and without which they could not

    pursue their ambitious development schemes (18,

    pp. 210-16). To consider the latter problem, the Ashby

  • 46

    Commission on Higher Education was appointed in 1959

    submitting its report in 1960, in which it advocated an

    expansion of educational facilities at the secondary,

    technical and university level that would cost the

    federal, and regional governments nearly 50 percent of

    their recurrent budgets (20). Furthermore, it insisted

    not only that the primary educational system at that time

    be maintained in the South, but that primary education be

    extended in the North, so that in fact there would result

    an even greater output of primary school-leavers seeking

    jobs that did not exist. This improvement of educational

    facilities was accompanied by the important if less

    spectacular extension of other social services. Hospitals

    more than doubled in the post-war period. A teaching

    hospital was established at Ibadan, the most advanced in

    tropical Africa (8, p. 308). Crowder points out that this

    teaching hospital even had departments for the training

    of psychiatric and medical social workers (9, p. 308).

    Kimble in his research in 1960, on Nigerian educa-

    tional development in particular and in tropical Africa

    as a whole, found out that the attitudes of African

    parents toward the education of their daughters were

    unfavorable to white man's schools because several aspects

    of teaching in those schools dominated by the whites did

    not conform to the original Africans' way of life—

  • 47

    attitudes toward land and Kin, valuation of leisure and

    regard for the world of spirits. Kimble says:

    • . . most parents contend that all a girl needs to

    indus?rvSin a S c l e a n l lness, good manners,

    capable of Sf eaching^her .' ̂ y ^ e ^ s ^ '

    lessadocilePandl1:fflf l n d e e d t h e^ might not make her wifely duties *(2^ ^'loo) ^ P - f ° ~

  • 48

    The scarcity of adequately qualified teachers was obviously one of the main problems (16, p m "

    In 1969 Yesufu conducted a research on the Nigerian

    school system and its development. He noticed that the

    traditional educational pattern introduced by the European

    missionaries has contributed in no small measure to the

    failure of social and economic progress in Nigeria.

    Yesufu writes:

    process of change is partly due to the fact t-hat-many of the African leaders are attemptfng to solve their problems with an antiquated tool, which in

    ^ ™ education

    Recent literature on social change and Nigerian

    education indicates that Nigeria's educational system

    today strongly advocates major social changes in the

    secondary school curricula. Ekpenyong (13, p. 37),

    writing in 1976 stated that, in the past, secondary

    school curricula dealt with non-technical subjects such as

    the teaching of English language and its grammatical

    structures, computations involving heavy numbers applied

    to the "four rules" namely, mechanical addition, sub-

    traction, multiplication and division. According to

    Ekpenyong, who is a sociologist/anthropologist, the modern

    educational system should teach environmental subjects

    that relate to the lives of Nigerians. These subjects

  • 49

    should include agriculture in the rural area, technical

    subjects that would alleviate the problem of unskilled

    workers in the urban areas, social sciences that would

    enable the Nigerian citizens to interact socially within

    the community and to emphasize social and cultural

    development in the near future (13, p. 38). Tims, (1974,

    after studying the educational system of Nigeria, sees

    the need for a change in the secondary school curriculum

    and suggests:

    f e d e r a ] ' , n / ^ e f P a n d i n 9 secondary education, both ederal and state investment should concentrate

    on increasing facilities for the teaching of science

    related ' • • S c ience should be elated to the local environment and the academic

    and' * b e a d o P t e d t o emphasize the social, n ft?? development of the individual (45, P. OO). v '

    In 1966, the latest period for which reliable country-

    wide statistics were available, children attended classes

    in 14,907 primary schools (43). Although this figure

    indicated a 3.8 percent reduction in primary schools

    since 1960, it probably reflected consolidations of smaller

    schools (28, p. 180). By 1968 enrolment had risen to

    an estimated 3.1 million pupils, or about 30 percent of

    all children of primary school age. Voluntary agencies-

    missions, private individuals, or community organizations-

    provided schooling for various segments of the primary

    age group in each of the states. Most primary-level

  • 50

    teachers were Nigerians, and many of them had little more

    than a primary education themselves (28, p. 181).

    The absence of a uniform system in teacher education

    in Nigeria is a great handicap to the nation's educational

    policy and development. The chairman of the Committee

    on National Policy on Education, Professor Sanya Onabamiro

    said recently that this situation has introduced dis-

    parity in the quantity and quality of teachers turned out

    yearly by the various states of the Federation (29, p. 16).

    Answering a question on an NTA (Nigerian Television

    Authority) Ibadan programme--'"X-Ray," Professor Onabamiro

    said:

    A uniform system m teachers' education might soon

    w a s 1 ^ 1 0 ? 0 l n u h e C o u n t ry- He said his committee was not happy with its findings during a recent tour

    first s c h o o l V n t h S C ° U n t r y w h e n ifc discovered that irst school leaving certificate holders were teach-

    ( e l e n e n t « y school

    According to Professor Onabamiro, (29, p. 16), the

    quality of grade two teachers in the nineteen states of

    the Federation was not adequate. Onabamiro, a renowned

    educationist, warned that the situation could jeopardize

    the Country's educational system as well as other areas of

    development (29, p. 16).

    Professor Onabamiro who is also the chairman of the

    Committee on Alternative Sources of Funding Education, in

    Nigeria, hinted that, the proposed sixth form system for

  • 51

    post-primary institutions would be implemented as from the

    1982/83 session. This system, he explained, would ensure

    that students would undergo manual skill alongside with

    academic work within the first three years (29, p. 16).

    Those with academic aptitude would proceed to the senior

    secondary schools while those versed in craftmanship

    would proceed to technical secondary schools (29, p. 16).

    Classes in the lower grades in the primary schools

    are conducted in the predominant local language of the

    area, and English is introduced usually in the third or

    fourth year. Other subjects taught in the primary schools

    are geography, history, arithmetic, nature study, hygiene,

    cooking, needle work, handicrafts, religious studies,

    physical education, handwriting, and drawing (28, p. 181).

    A syllabus provided by the state government and keyed

    to a Nigerian background is followed by each school.

    Textbooks adapted to the Nigerian educational system

    have already replaced earlier books of British origin

    written for British pupils. The first School Leaving

    Certificate (elementary school diploma) is awarded

    at the end of the programme and is a prerequisite for

    admission to secondary schools or teacher training

    institutions (28, pp. 181-182).

    The Ministry of Education has responsibility for the

    overall development of education in Cross River State of

  • 52

    Nigeria. Following government's decision to take over all

    schools in Cross River State of Nigeria (with the exception

    of institutions such as Bible colleges and vocational

    training institutions)the amount of responsibility for

    the management and maintenance of standards has increased

    tremendously in recent years (6, p. 1).

    For effective administration of secondary schools

    and teacher training colleges in Cross River State of

    Nigeria, the state school board was established in 1969."

    It was later established as a statutory board under Part V

    of South Eastern State (now Cross River) education edict

    No. 5 of 1975 (6, p. 41). The Cross River State school

    board employs and assigns teachers to secondary and

    teacher training institutions (6, p. 41). The chairman

    is the statutory head of this board which oversees the

    implementation of policies in secondary and teacher train-

    ing institutions.

    As was mentioned earlier, the overall administration

    and control of the education system in the Federal Republic

    of Nigeria is vested in each state's Ministry of Education.

    Policy matters are largely handled by the Ministry of

    Education which is also responsible for the inspection of

    schools, examinations, certification of teachers and

    finance.

  • 53

    With the rapid expansion of both primary and secondary

    schools m Nigeria, the importance of the schools' inspec-

    torate in ensuring the attainment and maintenance of uni-

    form and high standards of education throughout the Country

    cannot be overemphasized. The federal schools inspectorate

    has offices in the nineteen states of the Federation (12,

    p. 78). Efforts are currently being made to recruit

    inspectors in subject areas of need such as technical

    education, Arabic, agricultural science, home economics,

    and Nigerian languages (12, p. 78).

    The Fifth National Conference of Inspectors was held

    m December 1979 with representatives from the nineteen

    states Ministries of Education attending. The Conference

    considered through lectures, workshop, symposia and school

    visits, various ways in which inspectors can ensure quality-

    education in an ever increasing student population and

    over-enrolment of classes (12, p. 78).

    The second major form of school inspections carried

    out during this period are full general inspection of

    schools. in these inspections, subject specialists

    carry out very detailed inspection of every aspect of the

    curriculum of selected schools for four days so that

    broad patterns of teaching and learning in different

    locations in the country are identified. This is most

    useful to state Ministries of Education in the formulation

  • 54

    of policies on major aspects of school management, organi-

    zation and administration.

    The report of the inspections also provides useful

    feedback on the physical facilities, resources, textbooks,

    training needs of teachers and school principals and on

    general school discipline.

    The Joint Consultative Committee on Education (JCC)

    has approved the core-curriculum for primary school science

    produced by the science education unit of the Ministry of

    Education. its science equipment centre organised a

    workshop in Kaduna in 1979, with the main objecitve of

    training a group of qualified technicians from each state

    m the handling and training of laboratory assistants

    (12, p. 78). In-service workshops on the junior secondary

    mathematics syllabus were also organised by the science

    education unit on a zonal basis at five different centres:

    Ife, Lagos, Owerri, Kano and Jos (12, p. 78).

    In Cross River State of Nigeria, the objective of the

    p ogramme was to provide enough classroom accommodation,

    equipment and facilities for all children who would attain

    the age of five as of September 1975. In the first year

    of the programme, the number of children of primary school

    age in Cross River State of Nigeria was estimated at

    585,228 (6, p. 5).

  • 55

    The Universal Primary Education Programme has been

    successfully launched and steps have been taken, and are

    being taken, to amend shortcomings. Plans have reached

    advanced stages for the provision of junior secondary

    schools in each state to absorb about 40 to 60 percent

    of the UPE products in September, 1982. This is in

    accordance with the new educational structure of the

    country's six years of primary, three years' junior,

    three years' senior secondary schools and four years'

    university education (46, p. 2120).

    Though UPE at primary level was successfully

    launched, there were, of course, difficulties and problems-

    particular ly in the areas of manpower, equipment and

    financial resources needs (46, p. 2120). When the programme

    was introduced in September, 1976, some classrooms were

    conducted under the shade of trees, in community halls,

    temporary thatched huts and so on, in order to make up

    for the short falls. Tables and chairs, textbooks and

    other writing materials were not adequate (46, p. 2120).

    The greatest impediment to the success of the

    Universal Primary Education (UPE) scheme, is teacher

    production. Efforts have, therefore been intensified to

    produce trained teachers of all categories. At present,

    there are 250 Grade II teacher colleges in Nigeria with

    a total enrolment of 240,000 (12, p. 78). There are also

  • 56

    50 institutions offering Nigerian Certificate of Educa-

    tion (NCE) courses in different subject combinations with

    a total student population of 3,500 (12, p. 78).

    Increasing the supply of