unece – group of experts on national accounts, 8 may 2014, item 7: global production
DESCRIPTION
Guide to Measuring Global Production - State of play -. UNECE – Group of Experts on National Accounts, 8 May 2014, Item 7: Global Production Mark de Haan (editor). Two consultations: main findings. Factorless goods producers (FGPs) Task Force consultation on FGPs: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
UNECE – Group of Experts on National Accounts, 8 May 2014, Item 7: Global Production
Mark de Haan (editor)
Guide to Measuring Global Production
- State of play -
Two consultations: main findings
1. Factorless goods producers (FGPs)Task Force consultation on FGPs:
‐ Defining output of FGPs;‐ The transaction between supplier and
principal;‐ Branding.
2. Preliminary review of the GuideMain feedback coming from a global consultation based on a first (almost) complete version of the Guide.
2
1. TF consultation on FGPs
FGP, main features:‐ Outsourcing physical transformation to a contract
producer (similar to outward processing);‐ Contract producer purchases material inputs
(different from processing);‐ FGP provides the blueprints of production and
owns the underlying intellectual property products (IPPs), or obtained the rights to IPP use;
‐ Controls the output of the production process and manages the production chain;
‐ Controls customer relationships. 3
1. TF consultation on FGPs
Recording principles agreed so far:‐ Conclusion of the TF is that FGPs differ
fundamentally from traders/distributers;‐ Alternatively FGPs should be classified as a
special case of manufacturers;‐ This point of view is supported by the
Advisory Expert Group on national accounts;‐ Implications for ISIC need to be further
considered by the UN Classifications Expert Group.
4
1. TF consultation on FGPs
Open issues:‐ Is the output of a FGP a good?
TF: yes‐ Should the international transactions be recorded
under general merchandise or merchanting? TF (large majority): general merchandise
‐ What is the nature of the transaction between the contractor and the FGP, a service or a good? TF (large majority): a goodThis point may require further clarification
5
1. TF consultation on FGPs
Open issues (continued):‐ What is the nature of the transaction between
the contractor and the FGP, a service or a good?Two options:(1)The GFP purchases an intermediate good
excluding the IPP content:(2)The FGP is the economic owner of the
produced good from the start.‐ Option (2) implies FGP is a special case of
processing leading to the purchase of a processing service.
6
1. TF consultation on FGPsOpen issues (continued):
‐ How does Branding relate to FGP? Branding: principal purchases goods for resale under the entity’s brand name and may spend substantial amounts on marketing assets.
‐ Key considerations: • Branding is often part of FGP type of activities• marketing assets are according to 2008 SNA not fixed
assets (and thus not IPPs) (cf. SNA research agenda)‐ Differentiating FGPs from traders (TF conclusion):
FGP are substantive IPP investors, more than 50% of value added originates from activities such as innovation, supply chain management and market research and marketing
7
Guide to Measuring Global Production
2. Global consultation‐ February – March 2014;‐ Based on a preliminary version excluding text on
the open FGP issues;‐ Comment form with questions on e.g. usefulness
of guidance, recommendations, coverage, areas for future work and chapter specific issues;
‐ 35 responses;‐ Generally responses were quite positive;‐ Nevertheless a range of suggestions for further
improvement were made. 8
2. Global consultation, main issues‐ Following up on FGPs: classification and recording of
transactions.‐ Data issues: extension of surveys and response burden;
new ways of collecting data; confidentiality issues and data exchange; international co-ordination.
‐ Principles of economic ownership: Could more be done in the area of IPP holding special purpose entities and economic (in contrast to legal) ownership of the IPPs?
‐ Adaption to country specific needs: e.g. link of agriculture and fishing to global value chains.
‐ The goods/services distinction: probably an issue for future work (beyond scope of the TFGP).
‐ More guidance, more case studies…..?
9
10
Thank [email protected]