8/8/2019 Understanding the Revenue Multiple

1/2

erstanding the Revenue Multiple -- GuruFocus.com

5/28/2010 7:56:0//www.gurufocus.com/news_print.php?id=90894

Understanding The Revenue MultipleApril-25-2010

One of my favorite topics when it comes to the stock market is how to value a stock. I always felt there was something mysterious about pricing a stock, and if understood well will lead to winninginvestment ideas. Well, we are in thebusiness of finding winners. The key to valuing a stock is understanding the basics of the variousmethods to price stocks. So today I want to dig into one of thevery first valuation metrics I learned: The Revenue Multiple. The great thing about the revenue multiple is its simplicity. On the other hand, it could also lead to poor valuation work. Before we jumpthe gunhere, lets define what a revenue multiple is.

There are two basic revenue multiples that every investor needs to be made aware of. The first, and most popular, is Price to Sales or simply P/S. The second, and themore robust metric of the two,is the EnterpriseValue (Equity + Debt - Cash) to Sales or EV/S.

Priceto Sales Ratio = Market Value of Equity/Revenue

Enterprise Value to Sales Ratio = (Market Value of Equity + Debt Cash)/Revenue

The EV/S multiple is more robust than the P/S multiple because it is more accurate to look at a companys total capital structure rather than just its equity portion. For a more detailed discussion ofthis pleaseclick on the following link: EBITDA: The Holy Grail of Stock Valuation

Ok, lets look at how the P/S and EV/S can lead to different valuation outcomes.We will look at a firm with a lot of debt: Duke Energy (DUK).

In this example since DUK is highly levered, it leads to a lower value for the equity portion(equity is what theholders of the stock get).

When you look at a company with minimal debt like Electronic Arts (ERTS),you seea profound difference.

The difference is quite large and can lead to different valuation outcomes. Take your time and closely study the P/S and EV/S multiples. The driver is the debt. Duke (DUK) had quite a bit of debt. Onthe other side of spectrum, Electronic Arts (ERTS) carries zero debt. When you look at the P/S and EV/S you can see how debt affected the pricing of theequity. So what else is this telling us? Well ifyou look at the P/S ratio of Electronic Arts, it is telling us that investors are willing to pay $1.80 (rounded) for every $1 of revenue that ERTS generates. Is that a reasonable multiple to pay? Itdepends. This is when you need to put on your analysiscap and do some historical analysis to get a good grasp on whether themultiple today is truly a valuemultiple.

Pros

Unlike earningsand book valuemultiples, which can become negative for many companies, the revenue multiple is available for most firms. This includes startup and distressed companies. Anotherstrength of the revenue multiple is being less susceptible to accounting tricks. Accounting plays a big role in determining net income and book value, and these values are influenced by accountingdecisions on depreciation, inventory, R&D, acquisition accounting and extraordinary charges. Furthermore, revenue multiples are less volatile than earnings multiples and hence are less likely to beaffected by year-to-year swings in a firms fortune. For instance, the price-earnings ratio (P/E) of a cyclical firm changes much more than its price-sales ratios (P/S), because earnings are much moresensitive to economic changes than revenues.

Cons

The biggest disadvantage of focusing on revenue is that it can lull you into assigning tremendous amounts of valueto firms that are generating high revenue growth whileactually losing significantamounts of money. Ultimately, a firm has to generate earnings and cash flows for it to have value. The revenue multiple fails in this regardquite miserably.

Overall, we at CR Investor dont depend too heavily on the revenue multiple because our focus is on free cash flow, because this is what the shareholders are entitled to. However, the revenuemultiple is an insightful data point that should be looked at and considered in the overall analysis and valuation. Furthermore, when using any type of market multiple please compare apples toapples. This means comparesmarket multiples such as the revenue multiple to companies that are in the same line of business.

If you want to learn more about valuation please visit [url=www.CRInvestor.net]CRInvestor.net[/url].

Happy Investing,Alexis Evidente

[email]aevidente@clearresearch.net[/email]

www.CRInvestor.net

Facebook: ClearResearch

8/8/2019 Understanding the Revenue Multiple

2/2

erstanding the Revenue Multiple -- GuruFocus.com

5/28/2010 7:56:0//www.gurufocus.com/news print.php?id=90894

Twitter: CR_Investor

If you really want to see our investment process in action please go to our site CRInvestor.net . You will find unbelievable researchand reports that captures the true essence of value investing andeducation.We show our members how to become better stock pickers by sharpening their valuation skills. Our reports provide institutional level research never seen before on theretail l evel. Wefound Joes Jeans ( JOEZ ) at $0.22 which yielded an 845% return, and Hi-Shear Technology ( HSR ) that returned over 199% before being bought out. Not to mention that our results in 2009outperformed theS&P by 69.6% and wehave the brokerage statements to prove it!

Discuss this story

Featured ArticlesIra sohnInvestment Conference Notes

Buffett's 1982 Letter Warning Rep. Dingell About Derivatives

Seth KlarmanTop Holdings: NewsCorp.,ViaSat Inc., Theravance Inc., Domtar Corp., BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. , CapitalSource Inc.Warren Buffett foresaw looming municipal bond defaults

More Articles by Alexis Evidente:TGC Industries Inc. (NasdaqGS:TGE) Q4 2009 Update

Coldwater Creek (CWTR) Saves The Day

Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc: Buy The Guns, Not The Stock

Ammo On Sale: Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc. (NYSE:RGR) A Value Investment

Home Advertise Site Map Term of Use Privacy Policy Subscribe FAQ Contact Us Links

2004-2007 GuruFocus.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved.